正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Burna Boy could only stand 50cm behind Shakira, dressed in a basic $20 white T-shirt… but he quietly did THREE legendary things that rescued the entire performance! 🔥 You won’t believe #3 👀 #Shakira #BurnaBoy #WorldCup #DaiDai #FYP #HalftimeShow

1,960,639 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Steven Spielberg saw Stanley Kubrick for the first time in 1980 while he was building sets for "The Shining" (1980). After the movie was released, Spielberg went to Kubrick's house for dinner. Kubrick asked him if he liked the movie. Spielberg, who didn't like the movie in the first viewing, started to tell Kubrick all the things he liked about the movie, rather than telling that he didn't like the movie. Kubrick saw right through him and said, "Steven, you obviously didn't like my picture very much". Spielberg replied, "There is a lot of things that I like about the picture". Kubrick stopped him and said, "But there is a lot of things you didn't love about the picture, probably a lot more that you didn't than did. So tell me what you didn't like about it." Spielberg pinpointed Jack Nicholson's performance. He called him a "great actor" and a "great performance", but a "Great Kabuki Performance", almost like Kabuki theater. Kubrick then asked, "You mean you think Jack went over the top?". Spielberg replied affirmatively. Kubrick then asked Spielberg to name his top 5 favourite actors of all time without thinking much. Spielberg listed Spencer Tracy, Henry Fonda, James Stewart, Cary Grant and Clark Gable. Kubrick said, "Stop" & questioned, "Where was James Cagney on that list?" Spielberg said that he is up there high, Kubrick then said, "But not in the top 5". Finally Kubrick said," You don't consider James Cagney as one of the 5 best actors around, but I do. This is why Jack Nicholson's performance is a great one." Since then, Spielberg has caw "The Shining" more than 25 times & considers it one of his favourite pictures. P.S: Remembering the legendary American actor James Cagney on his 127th birthday! Clip from: One, Two, Three (1961) Director: Billy Wilder

DepressedBergman

396,766 次观看 • 1 个月前

I have had about 24 hours to collect my thoughts on the fact that Charleston White placed me in his followers’ crosshairs in his last interview. I watched the entire video and was shocked at some of the words that came out of his mouth, allegedly information fed to him by Drew Anthony, Karmelo Anthony’s father. He smeared the Metcalf family and told lie after lie. But he also, once again, placed a target on my back, just like Dominique Alexander did. In JumpSuitPablo’s latest podcast on YouTube, he goes over Charleston White’s words. White created an entire fake narrative in the video, a self-defense narrative that I know came straight from Drew Anthony, because these are the same exact words Drew would spew at me on Facebook Messenger for days on end. Every time I released new information, documents, or records, Drew would message me, accusing me of harassment. White said, “Whoever Sarah Fields is, you’re a rotten motherf*cker. And if I had an army to put behind this family, I would.” He also said that “he (Karmelo) should have killed both of them.” These are the people the Metcalf family and I have been dealing with since the beginning of April. Please listen to this clip. JumpSuitPablo reads off a threatening comment toward me. It’s not for the faint of heart. I have never cried while listening to a podcast before, but JumpSuitPablo’s kind words were deeply appreciated. He said, “I stand with Sarah Fields. Let’s protect Sarah Fields.” His words shine brightly for me and my family right now. I stand with the Metcalf family. I stand with Austin. And I will never stop being a voice for Austin. I strongly encourage you all to follow JumpSuitPablo on YouTube and listen to this entire episode, where he shows multiple clips of Charleston White’s video. I will link it in the comments. And I agree, I do believe White was paid to say these things.

Sarah Fields

65,150 次观看 • 1 年前

I just made a video about the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy case, and there is something much bigger here than one trial. Eleven jurors ultimately reached one conclusion. One man resisted. Why? Because he could not simply get past the fact that three children were gone. Think about the moral inversion required to ridicule him for that. He was reportedly the juror who struggled the longest with finding Lindsay Clancy not criminally responsible. He forced a mistrial rather than surrender his judgment simply because the room was moving against him. And now people are coming after HIM. That should tell you something. This is what ideological conformity looks like. People preach individuality right up until an individual refuses to think like the collective. Then suddenly independence becomes a character defect. Leave the political plantation, question the approved narrative, refuse to subordinate your conscience to the crowd, and watch how quickly yesterday’s champions of tolerance become remarkably intolerant. That young man did something increasingly rare. He stood alone. Eleven people could not make him pretend he believed something he did not believe. There is an old word for that: adamantine. Unbreakable. You do not have to agree with every conclusion he reached to recognize the courage required to sit in that room, outnumbered 11 to 1, and say: No. I am not surrendering my conscience. Three children were gone. He believed somebody in that room needed to keep them at the center of the case. So he did. He’s a G! Stand your ground when your conscience tells you something is wrong. Being outnumbered does not make you incorrect. Sometimes it simply means you are the only person still willing to stand. #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks

A Gene Robinson

41,386 次观看 • 2 天前