Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

By this point, the pattern becomes impossible to ignore. The same sequence shows up again and again, policies introduced gradually, framed as temporary, justified by crisis. Australia during COVID becomes the reference point, where some of the strictest measures were rolled out through a mix of state and federal... coordination. Now, similar language is being used again. “COVID-style protocols.” Fuel rationing. License plate restrictions. Reduced travel. Shorter workweeks. Remote work. Remote schooling. Individually, each one makes sense. Together, they begin pointing in the same direction. In her view, these aren’t isolated responses, they’re extensions of the same behavioral shifts introduced during COVID, now being reinforced under a different crisis. And that leads to the issue she kept coming back to. Dependence. The more dependent the system, the easier it is to steer. When countries rely heavily on global systems, external shocks, whether from war, supply chains, or energy disruptions, ripple through everything. Her answer was self-sufficiency. Reduce reliance. Build internal resilience. Control what you can within your own borders. Otherwise, she warned, the direction doesn’t change. It accelerates.show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,969,308 subscribers

16,087 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Health & Wellness Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Multiple countries are now rolling out “COVID-style” policies in response to the war. And officials aren’t hiding it, they’re calling them exactly that. From fuel rationing, to licence plate tracking, to fines for driving when you’re “not allowed,” even down to what you’re permitted to cook with… If this is starting to sound familiar, it should. Because it is. This didn’t start with the war. It began during COVID, and now it’s accelerating into the next phase. What’s being called emergency response starts to look a lot more like a long-planned shift, one that struggled to gain traction under the green agenda, but suddenly makes sense when there’s a real crisis and real shortages. And now there’s proof. A 10-point plan published by the International Energy Agency lays it out clearly, and countries are already following it to a tee. Here are the facts… 🧵

Multiple countries are now rolling out “COVID-style” policies in response to the war. And officials aren’t hiding it, they’re calling them exactly that. From fuel rationing, to licence plate tracking, to fines for driving when you’re “not allowed,” even down to what you’re permitted to cook with… If this is starting to sound familiar, it should. Because it is. This didn’t start with the war. It began during COVID, and now it’s accelerating into the next phase. What’s being called emergency response starts to look a lot more like a long-planned shift, one that struggled to gain traction under the green agenda, but suddenly makes sense when there’s a real crisis and real shortages. And now there’s proof. A 10-point plan published by the International Energy Agency lays it out clearly, and countries are already following it to a tee. Here are the facts… 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

113,199 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the nation tonight at 7pm on the escalating fuel crisis, in a move already being compared to the COVID-era national addresses. Australians are expected to be urged to “play their part”… By cutting fuel usage. But behind the scenes, it goes further. Sources suggest the Premier of South Australia has been contacting CEOs across the state… Pushing for work-from-home measures to reduce fuel demand. Let that sink in. COVID-style responses… Not for a pandemic But for a fuel shortage. This is no longer just about energy. This is about how far governments are willing to go… And how much control they expect people to accept. Was COVID the exception… Or the blueprint? Because what we may be witnessing right now… Is phase two. A shift toward reduced productivity… Increased dependence… And a system where behaviour becomes tied to access. The real question is Do Australians comply… Or do Australians push back? At some point… A country has to decide where the line is.

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the nation tonight at 7pm on the escalating fuel crisis, in a move already being compared to the COVID-era national addresses. Australians are expected to be urged to “play their part”… By cutting fuel usage. But behind the scenes, it goes further. Sources suggest the Premier of South Australia has been contacting CEOs across the state… Pushing for work-from-home measures to reduce fuel demand. Let that sink in. COVID-style responses… Not for a pandemic But for a fuel shortage. This is no longer just about energy. This is about how far governments are willing to go… And how much control they expect people to accept. Was COVID the exception… Or the blueprint? Because what we may be witnessing right now… Is phase two. A shift toward reduced productivity… Increased dependence… And a system where behaviour becomes tied to access. The real question is Do Australians comply… Or do Australians push back? At some point… A country has to decide where the line is.

George Mamalis

19,268 views • 3 months ago

DISTURBING: Governments are now pushing “COVID 2.0” style measures, including fuel rationing, fines for driving, and new restrictions on commercial flights. And it’s not isolated, the same pattern is emerging across multiple countries as fuel shortages begin to tighten. Australia is warning of possible fuel rationing as supply chains strain, with some stations already limiting how much drivers can buy. New Zealand is reviewing emergency laws that could restrict how often people are allowed to drive, including fines for violations. Sri Lanka has already introduced weekly shutdowns to conserve fuel. Airlines are also cutting flights, with growing concern that wider travel limits may be next. One industry executive says the current conditions feel similar to the early days of the pandemic. So is this a short-term disruption, or the start of a “COVID 2.0” crisis? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's urgent report and decide for yourself. 👇

DISTURBING: Governments are now pushing “COVID 2.0” style measures, including fuel rationing, fines for driving, and new restrictions on commercial flights. And it’s not isolated, the same pattern is emerging across multiple countries as fuel shortages begin to tighten. Australia is warning of possible fuel rationing as supply chains strain, with some stations already limiting how much drivers can buy. New Zealand is reviewing emergency laws that could restrict how often people are allowed to drive, including fines for violations. Sri Lanka has already introduced weekly shutdowns to conserve fuel. Airlines are also cutting flights, with growing concern that wider travel limits may be next. One industry executive says the current conditions feel similar to the early days of the pandemic. So is this a short-term disruption, or the start of a “COVID 2.0” crisis? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's urgent report and decide for yourself. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

85,793 views • 4 months ago

🚨 COVID 2.0? Or something bigger… This isn’t just a fuel crisis. This is what happens when a country gives up control of its own future. We shut down refineries. We outsourced our energy. We became dependent. Now when the world shakes… we feel it instantly. And here’s the uncomfortable truth 👇 Every crisis opens the door for more control. More rules. More systems. More decisions made for you. We’ve seen how quickly things can change. We’ve seen how fast “temporary” measures become permanent. And now… talk of shortages, rationing, restrictions is back. So the real question is not just “what’s happening?” It’s who’s in control when it happens? Australia should never be in a position where global instability dictates how we live. This is about sovereignty. This is about leadership. This is about whether we stand on our own… or stay dependent. Fix it now… or get used to more of it.

🚨 COVID 2.0? Or something bigger… This isn’t just a fuel crisis. This is what happens when a country gives up control of its own future. We shut down refineries. We outsourced our energy. We became dependent. Now when the world shakes… we feel it instantly. And here’s the uncomfortable truth 👇 Every crisis opens the door for more control. More rules. More systems. More decisions made for you. We’ve seen how quickly things can change. We’ve seen how fast “temporary” measures become permanent. And now… talk of shortages, rationing, restrictions is back. So the real question is not just “what’s happening?” It’s who’s in control when it happens? Australia should never be in a position where global instability dictates how we live. This is about sovereignty. This is about leadership. This is about whether we stand on our own… or stay dependent. Fix it now… or get used to more of it.

George Mamalis

116,824 views • 3 months ago

🚨🌏 “We will be talking about the impacts of this War for months and years” “Oil prices are up 9% today alone” “The cost of living crisis is about to come back again” “This is the Strait of Hormuz - global fertiliser supply 34% passes through “4 out of the 5 biggest oilfield in the world are here in the Gulf” “These two places are now under attack - so it’s not just about transporting it, it’s now whether you can even extract it” You thought the panic buying during Covid was bad…. Just wait.

🚨🌏 “We will be talking about the impacts of this War for months and years” “Oil prices are up 9% today alone” “The cost of living crisis is about to come back again” “This is the Strait of Hormuz - global fertiliser supply 34% passes through “4 out of the 5 biggest oilfield in the world are here in the Gulf” “These two places are now under attack - so it’s not just about transporting it, it’s now whether you can even extract it” You thought the panic buying during Covid was bad…. Just wait.

Concerned Citizen

21,770 views • 4 months ago

REPORT: Nearly 20% of the world’s population is now being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war. Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow. In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead. For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world. Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control. The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.

REPORT: Nearly 20% of the world’s population is now being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war. Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow. In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead. For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world. Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control. The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

41,403 views • 2 months ago

Why the IMF Is Dangerous: Zambia as a Case Study Zambia’s story is one of the clearest examples of why the IMF is not a rescuer, and Africans need to stop treating it like one. When Zambia ran into crisis, the response was not to help the country build lasting strength. It was to cut food subsidies, reduce spending on education and healthcare, and strip the state of control over its own strategic assets. The copper mines, which should have remained central to Zambia’s economic future, were pushed back into foreign hands. That is not support. That is economic domination packaged as reform. This is why Africans have to look more critically at what so-called help from Western-led financial institutions has actually done across the continent. Time and again, the pattern is the same: countries enter crisis, external lenders step in with conditions, and those conditions weaken public systems, deepen hardship, and erode national control over resources. What is presented as financial assistance often leaves African nations poorer, more dependent, and less able to determine their own path. It's time we call it what it is: neo-colonialism operating through the deceptive language of economic rescue.

Why the IMF Is Dangerous: Zambia as a Case Study Zambia’s story is one of the clearest examples of why the IMF is not a rescuer, and Africans need to stop treating it like one. When Zambia ran into crisis, the response was not to help the country build lasting strength. It was to cut food subsidies, reduce spending on education and healthcare, and strip the state of control over its own strategic assets. The copper mines, which should have remained central to Zambia’s economic future, were pushed back into foreign hands. That is not support. That is economic domination packaged as reform. This is why Africans have to look more critically at what so-called help from Western-led financial institutions has actually done across the continent. Time and again, the pattern is the same: countries enter crisis, external lenders step in with conditions, and those conditions weaken public systems, deepen hardship, and erode national control over resources. What is presented as financial assistance often leaves African nations poorer, more dependent, and less able to determine their own path. It's time we call it what it is: neo-colonialism operating through the deceptive language of economic rescue.

The Spearhead

11,314 views • 3 months ago

REPORT: Big Tech is moving into the one thing everyone depends on: the food supply—and it’s happening right now, in plain sight. What’s being sold as innovation is becoming the foundation of a system that’s far more centralized, and far harder to walk away from. Peter Thiel just poured $2 billion into a company called Halter, where farmers can control entire herds through an app. Tap a button, and hundreds of thousands of cows move on command, guided by solar-powered collars tracking their health, behavior, and location 24/7 with machine learning. Now layer in the 2026 Farm Bill, which covers up to 90% of the cost for adopting these systems, while letting tech companies, not regulators, define how they operate. Food, data, infrastructure… all being pulled into the same network. At that point, the question isn’t whether this makes farming easier. It’s who controls the system once everything runs through it, and what happens when access to it depends on compliance. And once you see how this actually works, it’s hard to look at any of this the same way again. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report: 👇

REPORT: Big Tech is moving into the one thing everyone depends on: the food supply—and it’s happening right now, in plain sight. What’s being sold as innovation is becoming the foundation of a system that’s far more centralized, and far harder to walk away from. Peter Thiel just poured $2 billion into a company called Halter, where farmers can control entire herds through an app. Tap a button, and hundreds of thousands of cows move on command, guided by solar-powered collars tracking their health, behavior, and location 24/7 with machine learning. Now layer in the 2026 Farm Bill, which covers up to 90% of the cost for adopting these systems, while letting tech companies, not regulators, define how they operate. Food, data, infrastructure… all being pulled into the same network. At that point, the question isn’t whether this makes farming easier. It’s who controls the system once everything runs through it, and what happens when access to it depends on compliance. And once you see how this actually works, it’s hard to look at any of this the same way again. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report: 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

57,127 views • 3 months ago

You were told to question everything. So you looked past the mainstream… and picked a side that felt like the alternative. But why does every path still lead back to the same people? Different countries. Different leaders. Different narratives, yet the outcome keeps moving in the same direction… no matter who’s “winning.” The “multipolar world” isn’t what people think. The WEF is just one piece of it. Look closer, and the same names and networks keep showing up. From the League of Nations—now the United Nations—to Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. So why are so many people convinced this is a battle between the “good guys” and the “bad guys”? Independent journalist James Corbett has been tracking this for 19 years, and he’s come to a conclusion most people don’t want to hear: no one is coming to save us. No matter which side appears to be “winning,” the direction doesn’t change. It leads to the same place. Technocracy. And if you look back at COVID, you’ve already seen how this works. Maybe every event isn’t perfectly orchestrated… But the outcome? That’s a different story. 🧵

You were told to question everything. So you looked past the mainstream… and picked a side that felt like the alternative. But why does every path still lead back to the same people? Different countries. Different leaders. Different narratives, yet the outcome keeps moving in the same direction… no matter who’s “winning.” The “multipolar world” isn’t what people think. The WEF is just one piece of it. Look closer, and the same names and networks keep showing up. From the League of Nations—now the United Nations—to Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. So why are so many people convinced this is a battle between the “good guys” and the “bad guys”? Independent journalist James Corbett has been tracking this for 19 years, and he’s come to a conclusion most people don’t want to hear: no one is coming to save us. No matter which side appears to be “winning,” the direction doesn’t change. It leads to the same place. Technocracy. And if you look back at COVID, you’ve already seen how this works. Maybe every event isn’t perfectly orchestrated… But the outcome? That’s a different story. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

35,430 views • 2 months ago

REPORT: Moderna just landed a $50 million contract to develop an Ebola vaccine as a new outbreak spreads through the Democratic Republic of Congo. The timing feels eerily familiar. The funding comes from a familiar place: CEPI, which is bankrolled by, you guessed it, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Many of the same institutions that played central roles during COVID are now mobilizing around another outbreak, with CEPI saying vaccine candidates could reach trial phase within MONTHS. The primary testing method being used is PCR, the same broken test that hyperinflated COVID cases to justify mandated injections. The COVID response proved that nobody will be held accountable. Now, the response to this outbreak is already following the same script. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial’s report for the full details before the next “health emergency” takes over your life again.

REPORT: Moderna just landed a $50 million contract to develop an Ebola vaccine as a new outbreak spreads through the Democratic Republic of Congo. The timing feels eerily familiar. The funding comes from a familiar place: CEPI, which is bankrolled by, you guessed it, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Many of the same institutions that played central roles during COVID are now mobilizing around another outbreak, with CEPI saying vaccine candidates could reach trial phase within MONTHS. The primary testing method being used is PCR, the same broken test that hyperinflated COVID cases to justify mandated injections. The COVID response proved that nobody will be held accountable. Now, the response to this outbreak is already following the same script. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial’s report for the full details before the next “health emergency” takes over your life again.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

42,018 views • 1 month ago

DISTURBING: Governments across the world are suddenly reviving policies that look eerily familiar: remote work mandates, travel discouragement, and fuel rationing—all triggered by a rapidly escalating global energy crisis. And this time, it’s not COVID-19 driving the restrictions. It’s oil. As war in the Middle East disrupts fuel supplies and sends prices swinging, governments from Southeast Asia to Europe are scrambling to conserve energy. Thailand and Vietnam are already urging public employees to work from home while asking citizens to avoid overseas travel and cut back on personal vehicle use. In Vietnam’s capital, Hanoi, officials are even encouraging residents to ditch their cars entirely, recommending public transit, cycling, and carpooling as fuel costs surge and petrol stations shorten hours. But the trend is spreading far beyond Southeast Asia. Pakistan is shifting large portions of its workforce to remote work, reducing office staffing to roughly half capacity and introducing four-day workweeks in some departments. Schools and universities are moving online to cut commuting and conserve fuel. The Philippines is rolling out similar measures, including four-day workweeks in executive offices and expanded remote work across both public and private sectors to lower fuel consumption. Bangladesh has already closed universities to conserve electricity and transportation fuel, while Myanmar has begun rationing fuel by forcing half the country’s private vehicles off the roads each day based on license plate numbers. Meanwhile, in the UK, motorists are being advised to drive less, while authorities in India have invoked emergency powers to ration LPG supplies for restaurants and businesses. And in Australia, the crisis is already hitting the ground. Farmers report empty diesel tanks, stalled machinery, and canceled deliveries, while some petrol stations are limiting customers to just $20 of fuel as panic buying spreads. If energy shortages deepen, these early conservation measures could quickly evolve into something far more restrictive. The question now is obvious: are we watching the first phase of global energy lockdowns? If the situation in the Middle East does not resolve soon, these measures may only be the beginning. Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report: 👇

DISTURBING: Governments across the world are suddenly reviving policies that look eerily familiar: remote work mandates, travel discouragement, and fuel rationing—all triggered by a rapidly escalating global energy crisis. And this time, it’s not COVID-19 driving the restrictions. It’s oil. As war in the Middle East disrupts fuel supplies and sends prices swinging, governments from Southeast Asia to Europe are scrambling to conserve energy. Thailand and Vietnam are already urging public employees to work from home while asking citizens to avoid overseas travel and cut back on personal vehicle use. In Vietnam’s capital, Hanoi, officials are even encouraging residents to ditch their cars entirely, recommending public transit, cycling, and carpooling as fuel costs surge and petrol stations shorten hours. But the trend is spreading far beyond Southeast Asia. Pakistan is shifting large portions of its workforce to remote work, reducing office staffing to roughly half capacity and introducing four-day workweeks in some departments. Schools and universities are moving online to cut commuting and conserve fuel. The Philippines is rolling out similar measures, including four-day workweeks in executive offices and expanded remote work across both public and private sectors to lower fuel consumption. Bangladesh has already closed universities to conserve electricity and transportation fuel, while Myanmar has begun rationing fuel by forcing half the country’s private vehicles off the roads each day based on license plate numbers. Meanwhile, in the UK, motorists are being advised to drive less, while authorities in India have invoked emergency powers to ration LPG supplies for restaurants and businesses. And in Australia, the crisis is already hitting the ground. Farmers report empty diesel tanks, stalled machinery, and canceled deliveries, while some petrol stations are limiting customers to just $20 of fuel as panic buying spreads. If energy shortages deepen, these early conservation measures could quickly evolve into something far more restrictive. The question now is obvious: are we watching the first phase of global energy lockdowns? If the situation in the Middle East does not resolve soon, these measures may only be the beginning. Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report: 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

275,452 views • 4 months ago

“Well, James Bogle, the barrister in the potentially precedent-setting medical inquest, is hinting there at the fact that his own opinion now may well be - he's not just doing his job here as a professional barrister saying, ‘I'm going to make the case for the family’ - he's hinting there in his clip that because his own personal experience with his mother, that his own opinion is also this, that the hospitals under the instruction of the health secretary at the time, Matt Hancock, were prematurely placing all of the elderly on end of life care pathways, regardless of whether or not they were diagnosed or not with COVID, because they were always able to place that on the death certificate afterwards. If you remember the ‘died of COVID and died with COVID’ controversy, which again is now pretty much out in the open. But if you could regardless place COVID on their death certificate and the cause of death could have been anything, which is what the procedure was at the time, that if they died during that time, ‘put COVID on the death certificate’. That gave them the cover to prematurely place an entire bunch of elderly people onto the end of life care pathway, NG163, and to hasten their death using a combination of Midazolam and morphine. And the rest of this stream is going to be dedicated to why James Bogle is correct to be concerned about this on a personal level. And why he is now being vindicated because, not just as we've been covering from the early days on the Warrior Creed live stream, is the UK affected by this? But now new evidence has emerged, which we'll go into during the course of this live stream, that they have found exactly the same conclusions as Dr. Wilson's Sy’s Australia peer-reviewed research paper into the UK deaths. They found exactly the same conclusion in Canadian research. And it's being testified in Ireland that the same thing happened there too. And in addition, in the United States of America, which even made it to the Joe Rogan show. The Midazolam story has blown up. It's gone global. The US, Canada, Ireland and the UK, according to research from Australia, are all now talking about the use of Midazolam combined with morphine to prematurely hasten the deaths of the elderly, using COVID as cover. This story isn't going to go away. It's only going to get larger and larger, as this stream is now going to demonstrate.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED:

“Well, James Bogle, the barrister in the potentially precedent-setting medical inquest, is hinting there at the fact that his own opinion now may well be - he's not just doing his job here as a professional barrister saying, ‘I'm going to make the case for the family’ - he's hinting there in his clip that because his own personal experience with his mother, that his own opinion is also this, that the hospitals under the instruction of the health secretary at the time, Matt Hancock, were prematurely placing all of the elderly on end of life care pathways, regardless of whether or not they were diagnosed or not with COVID, because they were always able to place that on the death certificate afterwards. If you remember the ‘died of COVID and died with COVID’ controversy, which again is now pretty much out in the open. But if you could regardless place COVID on their death certificate and the cause of death could have been anything, which is what the procedure was at the time, that if they died during that time, ‘put COVID on the death certificate’. That gave them the cover to prematurely place an entire bunch of elderly people onto the end of life care pathway, NG163, and to hasten their death using a combination of Midazolam and morphine. And the rest of this stream is going to be dedicated to why James Bogle is correct to be concerned about this on a personal level. And why he is now being vindicated because, not just as we've been covering from the early days on the Warrior Creed live stream, is the UK affected by this? But now new evidence has emerged, which we'll go into during the course of this live stream, that they have found exactly the same conclusions as Dr. Wilson's Sy’s Australia peer-reviewed research paper into the UK deaths. They found exactly the same conclusion in Canadian research. And it's being testified in Ireland that the same thing happened there too. And in addition, in the United States of America, which even made it to the Joe Rogan show. The Midazolam story has blown up. It's gone global. The US, Canada, Ireland and the UK, according to research from Australia, are all now talking about the use of Midazolam combined with morphine to prematurely hasten the deaths of the elderly, using COVID as cover. This story isn't going to go away. It's only going to get larger and larger, as this stream is now going to demonstrate.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED:

أبو عمّار

23,457 views • 1 year ago

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

The Researcher

88,912 views • 4 months ago

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

729,943 views • 3 months ago

REPORT: The WHO is quietly locking in COVID-era vaccine passports as a permanent global system, and this time it goes far beyond emergency use. It begins with vaccine records, but quickly leads to a borderless digital health ID that can follow you, track you, and become nearly impossible to opt out of. The system starts with digital vaccination and prophylaxis records, then expands into routine immunizations, maternal and child data, and eventually full personal health profiles. But what comes next is even more concerning: ‘pre-emptive’ injections, positioned as a way to stop future pandemics before they begin. One of the groups backing this effort is tied to the same investment network that funded BioNTech-Pfizer during COVID. This is how temporary measures turn into permanent infrastructure. Because once your access, identity, and health data are all connected, there’s no easy way back. The next phase isn’t theoretical, it’s already being rolled out. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before this goes any further. 👇

REPORT: The WHO is quietly locking in COVID-era vaccine passports as a permanent global system, and this time it goes far beyond emergency use. It begins with vaccine records, but quickly leads to a borderless digital health ID that can follow you, track you, and become nearly impossible to opt out of. The system starts with digital vaccination and prophylaxis records, then expands into routine immunizations, maternal and child data, and eventually full personal health profiles. But what comes next is even more concerning: ‘pre-emptive’ injections, positioned as a way to stop future pandemics before they begin. One of the groups backing this effort is tied to the same investment network that funded BioNTech-Pfizer during COVID. This is how temporary measures turn into permanent infrastructure. Because once your access, identity, and health data are all connected, there’s no easy way back. The next phase isn’t theoretical, it’s already being rolled out. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before this goes any further. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

53,059 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇪🇺 Lagarde just admitted the quiet part out loud. ECB President Christine Lagarde warned that a third of the world’s fertilizer shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz (not a surprise to anyone with an IQ over room temperature) “and that’s at risk.” She went on to spell out the nightmare: jet fuel prices have already doubled, some European airports are quietly rationing, and if the disruption drags on, we’re looking at outright food rationing with “very different economic consequences.” This is the same EU machine that cheered every sanction on Russia, backed the Iran war, and rammed through Agenda 2030 while destroying its own industry and energy security, all by design? Now the firefighter is standing in front of the burning house, wringing her hands and telling us everything is under control while the price of food and fertilizer spirals. The same Eurocrats who turned cheap Russian gas into expensive American LNG are now watching the entire supply chain they helped wreck start to collapse. Natural consequences don’t negotiate. And the bill for Brussels strategic suicide is coming due.

🚨🇪🇺 Lagarde just admitted the quiet part out loud. ECB President Christine Lagarde warned that a third of the world’s fertilizer shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz (not a surprise to anyone with an IQ over room temperature) “and that’s at risk.” She went on to spell out the nightmare: jet fuel prices have already doubled, some European airports are quietly rationing, and if the disruption drags on, we’re looking at outright food rationing with “very different economic consequences.” This is the same EU machine that cheered every sanction on Russia, backed the Iran war, and rammed through Agenda 2030 while destroying its own industry and energy security, all by design? Now the firefighter is standing in front of the burning house, wringing her hands and telling us everything is under control while the price of food and fertilizer spirals. The same Eurocrats who turned cheap Russian gas into expensive American LNG are now watching the entire supply chain they helped wreck start to collapse. Natural consequences don’t negotiate. And the bill for Brussels strategic suicide is coming due.

THE ISLANDER

45,195 views • 2 months ago

US🇺🇸 TOMAHAWKS FOR UKRAINE🇺🇦 WON’T CHANGE THE WAR, BUT ENCIRCLEMENT OF RUSSIA🇷🇺 CONTINUES ‘We simply don’t have the weapon systems to launch the Tomahawks to give to the Ukrainians. And the same with any of the other weapon systems that have been brought up in the last couple months. The Barracuda missiles, the ERAM missiles, all these various wonder weapons. And we’ve seen a host, a list of wonder weapons as long as my arm that were supposed to have won this war for Ukraine, whether it be the Abrams tank, the HIMARS missiles, the F16s, et cetera. So it was always a bit of an empty threat. On a strategic level, they were talking about the tactical, operational levels, the actual conduct of the war, whether or not these weapons would make a difference in the war. But on the strategic picture, what the Tomahawks did do is break open again the question or the grievance that the Russians have had for decades now about the encroachment of American and NATO weapons systems on Russia. This is one of the core grievances of the war, one of the core issues that Russia has been articulating through successive American administrations. This idea of encirclement, most especially highlighted then by the emplacement of American missile batteries in Poland and Romania. So the Tomahawks brought to the centre again, I think, to the fore this strategic question, this national security imperative that is at the root of Russia’s reasons for this war. While they were an empty gesture in terms of being a threat, while of course there was an escalatory danger to them, even though they were an empty gesture, we could still have both of those things occurring at the same time. The bigger thing was this exposed again one of the root causes of the war; encirclement of Russia by NATO and the United States.’ -Former Pentagon and State Department Official Matthew Hoh on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

US🇺🇸 TOMAHAWKS FOR UKRAINE🇺🇦 WON’T CHANGE THE WAR, BUT ENCIRCLEMENT OF RUSSIA🇷🇺 CONTINUES ‘We simply don’t have the weapon systems to launch the Tomahawks to give to the Ukrainians. And the same with any of the other weapon systems that have been brought up in the last couple months. The Barracuda missiles, the ERAM missiles, all these various wonder weapons. And we’ve seen a host, a list of wonder weapons as long as my arm that were supposed to have won this war for Ukraine, whether it be the Abrams tank, the HIMARS missiles, the F16s, et cetera. So it was always a bit of an empty threat. On a strategic level, they were talking about the tactical, operational levels, the actual conduct of the war, whether or not these weapons would make a difference in the war. But on the strategic picture, what the Tomahawks did do is break open again the question or the grievance that the Russians have had for decades now about the encroachment of American and NATO weapons systems on Russia. This is one of the core grievances of the war, one of the core issues that Russia has been articulating through successive American administrations. This idea of encirclement, most especially highlighted then by the emplacement of American missile batteries in Poland and Romania. So the Tomahawks brought to the centre again, I think, to the fore this strategic question, this national security imperative that is at the root of Russia’s reasons for this war. While they were an empty gesture in terms of being a threat, while of course there was an escalatory danger to them, even though they were an empty gesture, we could still have both of those things occurring at the same time. The bigger thing was this exposed again one of the root causes of the war; encirclement of Russia by NATO and the United States.’ -Former Pentagon and State Department Official Matthew Hoh on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

97,333 views • 8 months ago

🚨 GLOBAL CONTROL WARNING — “THIS IS NOT THEORY… THIS IS THE PLAN” “The lust to control other human beings is as old as time.” Now the warning is escalating: A shift toward centralised global control Run not by elected leaders… But by unelected supranational systems The claim: A transition from liberal democracy → technocratic control Where: Access replaces ownership Credits replace currency Compliance replaces freedom An “inverted prison” You appear free… But everything you need is controlled. Food systems reshaped Energy usage dictated Agriculture reduced Supply chains centralised And at the core: A system where every action is monitored Every resource is managed Every individual is trackable Critics say this is about control — not climate. A restructuring of society at its foundation. Agree or disagree… One thing is certain: The direction of travel is toward more centralisation, more control, and less margin for independence. The real question is not whether change is coming… It’s how far it goes — and who holds the power when it does.

🚨 GLOBAL CONTROL WARNING — “THIS IS NOT THEORY… THIS IS THE PLAN” “The lust to control other human beings is as old as time.” Now the warning is escalating: A shift toward centralised global control Run not by elected leaders… But by unelected supranational systems The claim: A transition from liberal democracy → technocratic control Where: Access replaces ownership Credits replace currency Compliance replaces freedom An “inverted prison” You appear free… But everything you need is controlled. Food systems reshaped Energy usage dictated Agriculture reduced Supply chains centralised And at the core: A system where every action is monitored Every resource is managed Every individual is trackable Critics say this is about control — not climate. A restructuring of society at its foundation. Agree or disagree… One thing is certain: The direction of travel is toward more centralisation, more control, and less margin for independence. The real question is not whether change is coming… It’s how far it goes — and who holds the power when it does.

Jim Ferguson

75,199 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THIS IS WHERE FOOD PRICES EXPLODE A UK haulier has just laid it out in plain terms. Fuel costs up 48% since the start of the year. £4,000 more per week… just to keep trucks moving. Over £200,000 extra per year — for the same work. And now? For the first time ever — they’re adding fuel surcharges. Understand what this means. Every single product in a supermarket is delivered by diesel. If diesel rises… Everything rises. But here’s the breaking point: Many haulage companies cannot absorb these costs. They either: Pass it on Or stop operating And when transport slows… Supply chains break. This is where it hits hardest: Supermarkets. Food deliveries. Everyday essentials. Not in theory. In reality. Because once it becomes unviable to move goods… It doesn’t matter what’s in storage. It never reaches the shelves. This is how you get: Rapid price spikes Reduced availability Empty gaps in stores Not everywhere at once. But enough to change behaviour. This is no longer just rising prices. This is system strain. And when the system strains… It doesn’t warn you twice. Prepare now. Because once disruption becomes visible to everyone… It’s already too late.

🚨 THIS IS WHERE FOOD PRICES EXPLODE A UK haulier has just laid it out in plain terms. Fuel costs up 48% since the start of the year. £4,000 more per week… just to keep trucks moving. Over £200,000 extra per year — for the same work. And now? For the first time ever — they’re adding fuel surcharges. Understand what this means. Every single product in a supermarket is delivered by diesel. If diesel rises… Everything rises. But here’s the breaking point: Many haulage companies cannot absorb these costs. They either: Pass it on Or stop operating And when transport slows… Supply chains break. This is where it hits hardest: Supermarkets. Food deliveries. Everyday essentials. Not in theory. In reality. Because once it becomes unviable to move goods… It doesn’t matter what’s in storage. It never reaches the shelves. This is how you get: Rapid price spikes Reduced availability Empty gaps in stores Not everywhere at once. But enough to change behaviour. This is no longer just rising prices. This is system strain. And when the system strains… It doesn’t warn you twice. Prepare now. Because once disruption becomes visible to everyone… It’s already too late.

Jim Ferguson

69,170 views • 3 months ago

⚠️ INDIA WAS THE TEST LAB FOR THE GREAT RESET “My country was the first where they made cash illegal,” she said. In 2016, India’s government banned high-value banknotes overnight — forcing 1.4 billion people into a digital system they didn’t choose. By morning, 70% of the economy had collapsed. Now, that same model — digital ID, cash bans, centralised control — is being exported to the West under the banner of “modernisation.” “Digitalisation was forced on the country,” she warned. “When money goes digital, freedom goes with it.” She linked it all to the WEF’s Great Reset, describing it as a global experiment in surveillance economics — where algorithms decide what you can buy, and social credit determines who you are. WHAT THIS MEANS: • India was the prototype. The West is next. • Digital currency means programmable control — not convenience. • Once cash disappears, dissent becomes impossible. If ever there was a time for humanity to wake up — now is the time.

⚠️ INDIA WAS THE TEST LAB FOR THE GREAT RESET “My country was the first where they made cash illegal,” she said. In 2016, India’s government banned high-value banknotes overnight — forcing 1.4 billion people into a digital system they didn’t choose. By morning, 70% of the economy had collapsed. Now, that same model — digital ID, cash bans, centralised control — is being exported to the West under the banner of “modernisation.” “Digitalisation was forced on the country,” she warned. “When money goes digital, freedom goes with it.” She linked it all to the WEF’s Great Reset, describing it as a global experiment in surveillance economics — where algorithms decide what you can buy, and social credit determines who you are. WHAT THIS MEANS: • India was the prototype. The West is next. • Digital currency means programmable control — not convenience. • Once cash disappears, dissent becomes impossible. If ever there was a time for humanity to wake up — now is the time.

Jim Ferguson

192,149 views • 8 months ago