Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

‼️🇺🇸: Cabot Phillips is trying to TRICK Candace Owens into confirming his alibi. How? METADATA IS EASY TO EDIT 👇🏻 You can't 100% verify it. He wants Candace to confirm his alibi DESPITE the MANY HOLES in the image timeline. SO the FEDS can discredit the Fort Huachuca angle. 🫡

66,081 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.Candace Owens has repeatedly used the Fort Huachuca story to claim and insinuate that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, TPUSA, Cabot Phillips, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he wouldn’t witness this top-secret assassination meeting at Fort Huachuca. She promoted it by saying: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." "It feels like today will be the day that the government can no longer deny it." "A story from a man in the military that is about to blow this case open." On her show, she went further: "I just cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military's involvement in his assassination." That entire narrative rests solely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a court-documented pathological liar—and was sold as a pre-assassination meeting involving the U.S. military, Charlie’s wife, his head of security, his colleagues, and a sitting member of Congress. Yesterday, when Harrison H. Smith ✞ asked a simple question—why does Fort Huachuca matter, and what is the actual claim?—Candace suddenly shifted. Instead of standing by the accusation, she argued it “matters” because Brian Harpole gave an alibi and “acted weird,” citing vague suspicions, while refusing to say whether it was an assassination meeting at all. "It matters because why would Brian Harpole be at Fort Huachuca at all? It matters because he's giving an alibi which means he doesn't want to be associated... Like I said, Brian Harpole was acting funny. He's been acting weird. He cared enough to present an alibi, meaning he didn't want people to think he was there, right? So if you have to, if you have to give someone an alibi, is because you don't want people to think that you're there. Is an alibi is not needed if there's nothing to hide. So that's why I think that's why it matters." When pressed again on Erika Kirk’s involvement, Candace deflected—saying Erika wasn’t there that day (but was there the day before), insisting it’s not about conclusions, only “following lies” and “not normal reactions,” and admitting she “cannot definitely say” it was an assassination meeting. But Candace herself opened this story by declaring: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." You don’t get to accuse the U.S. military of murder, name Charlie's loved ones as participants in this top secret assassination planning meeting, hype an imminent government confession—and then retreat into "I’m just asking questions" and "why is he giving an alibi?" This is unhinged, baseless slander followed by gaslighting—built entirely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a child-kidnapping, women-abusing, court-documented pathological liar, whose story Candace incentivized with a $141,000 GiveSendGo campaign.

KanekoaTheGreat

348,825 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Just Linked Erika Kirk's SECRET Ex Cabot Phillips to the Fort Huachuca Meeting – And Ben Shapiro Is LOSING IT! 😱 Candace Owens dropped a MASSIVE BOMBSHELL on her Podcast TONIGHT when she revealed that the Fort Huachuca eyewitness "Mitch" just ID'd another person at the secret Sept 9th meeting: Cabot Phillips — Erika Kirk's ex-boyfriend from 2017 that she publicly claimed she NEVER dated before Charlie. Candace sent Mitch a photo of Cabot (now a Daily Wire employee with a beard) — NO context given — and Mitch immediately said: "YES, that's the guy I remember at the base." Cabot has been mysteriously MISSING from Daily Wire's Morning Wire show from Sept 4th–10th. Candace messaged him TWICE for comment — total silence. Now Candace is asking: Why is Ben Shapiro having a full meltdown on stage, obsessively attacking her over this investigation? "Why does Ben come completely unglued ONLY when Israel is mentioned? Why is he signaling so hard that we shouldn't look into Erika?" She says the deeper they dig — Egyptian planes, Fort Huachuca history, the lies about past relationships — the more it all points in one direction. Ben knows something. Cabot knows something. And the cover-up is cracking. The vibes are VIBING. This isn't coincidence anymore. Who was REALLY in that room the morning before Charlie Kirk died? FOLLOW Candace Owens And go watch her FULL episode from today's podcast. Link is down in the comments below. Truth is coming FAST. Drop your thoughts — is Israel involved? 👇

Project Constitution

303,558 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 CANDACE OWENS TIGHTENS THE TIMELINE ON SEPT 8TH: Erika Kirk MIA – Charlie Alone with Kids, No Alibi, Mitch Snow's Fort Huachuca Sighting Vindicated?! 💥👀 Tonight on Candace Owens podcast all the PUZZLE PIECES are snapping together. Candace just exposed the gaping holes in Erika Kirk's story around Charlie Kirk's final days. Candace dives deep: "Now we've learned more about Erica... the Fort Huachuca story. I'm leaning towards Mitch." September 8th timeline? TIGHTENING UP—Charlie was HOME watching the Chicago Bears game, screaming at his TV (waking Gigi), detailing plays like the Noah Sewell fumble. Candace's take: "Charlie was the parent that night... he was at home alone with the kids." Why? If Erika was there, he wouldn't be solo-dadding! Candace then questions Frank Turek's truthfulness. He claims Charlie had "dinner with the family" but NEVER mentions Erika. Candace: "I think Frank Turek was with Charlie... but I just don't buy that he was just suddenly in need of so much debate help." Crisis mode? Charlie consulted a rabbi, pastor (Turek?), priest in 48 hours—something BIG brewing. And that "angry" photo of Charlie looking off-screen during Ingram Angle? Likely Turek there, not Erika. NO ONE confirms seeing Erika on Sept 8th—neighbors know the family, spot the kids, but Erika? Ghost. "Nobody yet... an APB for September 8th for Erica Kirk." She pretends not to "understand instructions" for alibi proof—texts with Charlie? Unverified, could be faked. Erika's claim: Home at 5:24 PM making dinner? Lies—timeline shows Charlie parenting solo. This SCREAMS Mitch Snow was RIGHT: Saw Erika at Fort Huachuca on the 8th. "My spidey senses are telling me that Erica was not there on the 8th." Cover-up? Aggressive attacks when mentioned—we were "holding that back," but vibes say she was AWOL. All pieces aligning: Erika's pathological lies, no alibi—betrayal exposed. Charlie's legacy demands truth! FOLLOW Candace Owens, watch her FULL episode and RT if this timeline chills you. Candace is unraveling the web in real time!

Project Constitution

38,523 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад