Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

California is deploying AI-powered, high-resolution cameras to detect drivers holding or using cell phones This new pilot program has already recording hundreds of violations This is warrantless surveillance The systems use artificial intelligence to take high-resolution images of the front seat to identify if a driver is holding a...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,371,913 subscribers

62,363 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Surveillance is coming to vehicles New BMW cars are being equipped with interior cameras These cameras track eye gaze, head position and what they perceive to be drowsiness or being distracted. They can also take videos of you or photos According to BMW the car can handle steering, acceleration, braking and more if it thinks there is a safety issue Just imagine if the government could access these systems and control your car This is a slippery slope
2:31

Surveillance is coming to vehicles New BMW cars are being equipped with interior cameras These cameras track eye gaze, head position and what they perceive to be drowsiness or being distracted. They can also take videos of you or photos According to BMW the car can handle steering, acceleration, braking and more if it thinks there is a safety issue Just imagine if the government could access these systems and control your car This is a slippery slope

Wall Street Apes

46,909 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

As of June 2025, California’s new “No Touch” Phone Law is officially in effect. California Vehicle Code 23123.5 strictly prohibits drivers from physically handling their phones while driving.🚨 🚫 No Holding Allowed It is now illegal to hold a phone while driving, whether or not it’s in use. Simply holding the device is a violation. ✅ Hands-Free Use Drivers may use their phones if the device is mounted on the dashboard or windshield, and all interactions are made via voice commands/a single tap/ or swipe. 📍Navigation and Music Using your phone for GPS or music? It must still be mounted and used hands-free. Holding the phone at any time is not permitted—even for quick adjustments. Please stay off your phone while driving and stay alert.‼️
0:20

As of June 2025, California’s new “No Touch” Phone Law is officially in effect. California Vehicle Code 23123.5 strictly prohibits drivers from physically handling their phones while driving.🚨 🚫 No Holding Allowed It is now illegal to hold a phone while driving, whether or not it’s in use. Simply holding the device is a violation. ✅ Hands-Free Use Drivers may use their phones if the device is mounted on the dashboard or windshield, and all interactions are made via voice commands/a single tap/ or swipe. 📍Navigation and Music Using your phone for GPS or music? It must still be mounted and used hands-free. Holding the phone at any time is not permitted—even for quick adjustments. Please stay off your phone while driving and stay alert.‼️

LA County Sheriffs

14,306 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

TikTok just released new terms of service and make all accounts agree to them. American ran them through AI, here’s the breakdown - You can't be critical of political figures - Political groups could be blacklisted. A lot of the violation could be so it's subject to interpretation, their interpretation - In matters of social unrest or crisis, they can just change the rules, shut it down completely, whatever they decide to do - You're not allowed to mention other platforms, anything misleading, even if it's a joke. Can't tell jokes anymore because somebody might be confused - You are not allowed to criticize religion - There's a ban on dangerous stunts, so no more Nicki Minaj challenges with the high heels - You're not allowed to say sexy on your live feeds - You're also not allowed to say any brand names - You can't use AI to edit something or make it more realistic - You can't do anything funny with your pet if it's staged, they can say no, that's a violation - Can't have anything to do with being too skinny. No more skinny talk. - The prevention of harm. If they deem it that it could hurt somebody financially or emotionally, that rule is very vague and subject to just whatever they feel like saying - They can pull your video from the FYP page without deleting it, just calling it ineligible - They can decide if your video is not suitable for under 18 - They can change the rules on the fly, depending on where you're viewing from, like your geographic location. - Showing flags or logos in any kind of speech or using objects like, you know, how some people hold up the papers and stuff, that won't be allowed anymore. - If they decide your video helps a banned group, whoever they choose to ban, if they decide that you're helping them, that's a violation - If someone picks a fight with you and you do a clap back, that's a violation - If you've done things on a different platform, that's a violation - On TikTok now they reserve the right to limit who can search your videos, depending on if they like the content or not - If you win an appeal now, it doesn't mean that you're going to get back on the for you page. That doesn't. That doesn't matter anymore. You can win, but they still reserve the right to not show your video on the fyp - If you post a link, that can get your account banned completely. Not even a violation, just banned. “This is just crazy. This goes to, in fact, in effect September 13th. I think that's also when they're supposed to roll out the new TikTok for the United States. That'll probably have more rules than this one.”
4:40

TikTok just released new terms of service and make all accounts agree to them. American ran them through AI, here’s the breakdown - You can't be critical of political figures - Political groups could be blacklisted. A lot of the violation could be so it's subject to interpretation, their interpretation - In matters of social unrest or crisis, they can just change the rules, shut it down completely, whatever they decide to do - You're not allowed to mention other platforms, anything misleading, even if it's a joke. Can't tell jokes anymore because somebody might be confused - You are not allowed to criticize religion - There's a ban on dangerous stunts, so no more Nicki Minaj challenges with the high heels - You're not allowed to say sexy on your live feeds - You're also not allowed to say any brand names - You can't use AI to edit something or make it more realistic - You can't do anything funny with your pet if it's staged, they can say no, that's a violation - Can't have anything to do with being too skinny. No more skinny talk. - The prevention of harm. If they deem it that it could hurt somebody financially or emotionally, that rule is very vague and subject to just whatever they feel like saying - They can pull your video from the FYP page without deleting it, just calling it ineligible - They can decide if your video is not suitable for under 18 - They can change the rules on the fly, depending on where you're viewing from, like your geographic location. - Showing flags or logos in any kind of speech or using objects like, you know, how some people hold up the papers and stuff, that won't be allowed anymore. - If they decide your video helps a banned group, whoever they choose to ban, if they decide that you're helping them, that's a violation - If someone picks a fight with you and you do a clap back, that's a violation - If you've done things on a different platform, that's a violation - On TikTok now they reserve the right to limit who can search your videos, depending on if they like the content or not - If you win an appeal now, it doesn't mean that you're going to get back on the for you page. That doesn't. That doesn't matter anymore. You can win, but they still reserve the right to not show your video on the fyp - If you post a link, that can get your account banned completely. Not even a violation, just banned. “This is just crazy. This goes to, in fact, in effect September 13th. I think that's also when they're supposed to roll out the new TikTok for the United States. That'll probably have more rules than this one.”

Wall Street Apes

68,429 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

There are cameras that have been deployed on California freeways that are taking pictures of inside your car They capture multiple high-resolution photos through windshields, including front and back seats. They can even see through a heavy window tint This system creates government records of your vehicle’s interior occupants, travel companions and patterns Right now it’s being used to have AI analyze the images to count occupants, adults, children, car seats, then it flags potential violations for the HOV 3+ carpool lane to send people tickets Many believe there are privacy concerns and this is taking the next step into becoming a surveillance state Americans are losing all privacy and no one is voting for this surveillance
3:50

There are cameras that have been deployed on California freeways that are taking pictures of inside your car They capture multiple high-resolution photos through windshields, including front and back seats. They can even see through a heavy window tint This system creates government records of your vehicle’s interior occupants, travel companions and patterns Right now it’s being used to have AI analyze the images to count occupants, adults, children, car seats, then it flags potential violations for the HOV 3+ carpool lane to send people tickets Many believe there are privacy concerns and this is taking the next step into becoming a surveillance state Americans are losing all privacy and no one is voting for this surveillance

Wall Street Apes

131,756 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“Can you turn your camera off” Australian police cannot legally demand you stop recording them, nor can they demand deletion of the video or seize your phone. You have the legal right to record police in a public place. I encourage every Aussie to do so to keep them in line. “Do you know why we stopped you?” This is a trap. They ask you this to try and get an admission of the crime. Even if you were speeding never admit to it and just say “no idea, perhaps you can tell me”.
3:07

“Can you turn your camera off” Australian police cannot legally demand you stop recording them, nor can they demand deletion of the video or seize your phone. You have the legal right to record police in a public place. I encourage every Aussie to do so to keep them in line. “Do you know why we stopped you?” This is a trap. They ask you this to try and get an admission of the crime. Even if you were speeding never admit to it and just say “no idea, perhaps you can tell me”.

Anti-Feminism Australia

17,097 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

You remember the days when you could grab a sandwich on the way to work, sneak a quick text at a red light, or just zone out for a second while you’re driving? Those days are about to disappear in 2027. Starting with the 2027 model year, every new car sold in America has to have cameras and sensors inside the cabin watching your eyes, head position, and driving behavior. If the AI decides you’re distracted or impaired (phone, eating, whatever), the car can refuse to start, limit your speed to 25mph, or even shut itself off while you’re moving. It’s not just about drunk driving anymore. It’s about the government putting a watchful eye in your personal space every single time you get behind the wheel. A lot of people are gonna say “good the roads are chaotic, this needs to be done.” Others are gonna say “what the hell happened to our freedom?” Where do you land on this one?
0:53

You remember the days when you could grab a sandwich on the way to work, sneak a quick text at a red light, or just zone out for a second while you’re driving? Those days are about to disappear in 2027. Starting with the 2027 model year, every new car sold in America has to have cameras and sensors inside the cabin watching your eyes, head position, and driving behavior. If the AI decides you’re distracted or impaired (phone, eating, whatever), the car can refuse to start, limit your speed to 25mph, or even shut itself off while you’re moving. It’s not just about drunk driving anymore. It’s about the government putting a watchful eye in your personal space every single time you get behind the wheel. A lot of people are gonna say “good the roads are chaotic, this needs to be done.” Others are gonna say “what the hell happened to our freedom?” Where do you land on this one?

Desiree

66,529 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Here's Elon Musk in 2020 explaining why cameras with AI vision is all you need to achieve full autonomy. “The entire road network is designed for passive optical, essentially vision. In order to make a car drive properly, you have to solve vision. At the point at which you solve vision, you really don't need any other instruments. A careful human driver can drive with an extremely good track record. Unlike a human, the computer does not get tired, it has 360-degree surround cameras, it's got three cameras pointing forward. It's like being able to see with eyes in the back of your head. Vision is the way to go. There's some value to active optical for a wavelength that's occlusion-penetrating, so it can see through fog, or rain, or dust. But it has to be high resolution, such that you can rely on it, for example, for radar at roughly a four-millimeter wavelength. This is good for occlusion penetration. But it needs to have enough resolution to know that you're braking for a real object and not just a bridge or a manhole cover or something like that.” Axel Springer Pioneers Talk, December 1, 2020
1:06

Here's Elon Musk in 2020 explaining why cameras with AI vision is all you need to achieve full autonomy. “The entire road network is designed for passive optical, essentially vision. In order to make a car drive properly, you have to solve vision. At the point at which you solve vision, you really don't need any other instruments. A careful human driver can drive with an extremely good track record. Unlike a human, the computer does not get tired, it has 360-degree surround cameras, it's got three cameras pointing forward. It's like being able to see with eyes in the back of your head. Vision is the way to go. There's some value to active optical for a wavelength that's occlusion-penetrating, so it can see through fog, or rain, or dust. But it has to be high resolution, such that you can rely on it, for example, for radar at roughly a four-millimeter wavelength. This is good for occlusion penetration. But it needs to have enough resolution to know that you're braking for a real object and not just a bridge or a manhole cover or something like that.” Axel Springer Pioneers Talk, December 1, 2020

ELON CLIPS

1,513,170 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🗣️: Do you believe teammates in F1 teams should be able to just fight openly for championships or do you think inevitably there has to be some control from the pit wall? Carlos: I think it depends on the domination of the team. I think the Mercedes years was a perfect example of them being so dominating that they could afford to fight each other a bit more. I think whenever their championship can go away to a different team, a different driver, you need to respect that and be a bit more careful. I think even if the teams don't say that, the drivers' championship is something that a team wants. 🗣️: Especially when the other driver is Max Verstappen. Carlos: It doesn't matter who the other driver is. If the other driver is called Pepe or Pepito, it doesn't matter. If that championship can go for the team and the driver, and you have two drivers fighting for it, and there's one guy that can take it, it doesn't matter if it's Carlos Sainz, Max Verstappen or Charles Leclerc. You want the championship for your two drivers, so you want to keep them relatively under control.
1:12

🗣️: Do you believe teammates in F1 teams should be able to just fight openly for championships or do you think inevitably there has to be some control from the pit wall? Carlos: I think it depends on the domination of the team. I think the Mercedes years was a perfect example of them being so dominating that they could afford to fight each other a bit more. I think whenever their championship can go away to a different team, a different driver, you need to respect that and be a bit more careful. I think even if the teams don't say that, the drivers' championship is something that a team wants. 🗣️: Especially when the other driver is Max Verstappen. Carlos: It doesn't matter who the other driver is. If the other driver is called Pepe or Pepito, it doesn't matter. If that championship can go for the team and the driver, and you have two drivers fighting for it, and there's one guy that can take it, it doesn't matter if it's Carlos Sainz, Max Verstappen or Charles Leclerc. You want the championship for your two drivers, so you want to keep them relatively under control.

yoyo 🦄

212,893 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Americans are under surveillance Roughly 40,000-60,000 cameras have been placed throughout 42 states that are tagging your vehicle and entering it into a database to track you “These cameras capture more than your license. They can capture the interior of your vehicle as you drive by these cameras, especially the positioning of the camera and it's legal (Attorney shows a picture of what one of these “Flock Cameras” looks like, when you see it you’ll instantly recognize it. They’re everywhere) “So what happens is this camera captures your tag and when it captures your tag is able to detect where your vehicle has been anywhere in the United States where there are flock cameras. If you're in Georgia and you travel to New York, every time your vehicle tag gets captured by a flock camera, it is entered into a database and they are able to track it.”
1:02

Americans are under surveillance Roughly 40,000-60,000 cameras have been placed throughout 42 states that are tagging your vehicle and entering it into a database to track you “These cameras capture more than your license. They can capture the interior of your vehicle as you drive by these cameras, especially the positioning of the camera and it's legal (Attorney shows a picture of what one of these “Flock Cameras” looks like, when you see it you’ll instantly recognize it. They’re everywhere) “So what happens is this camera captures your tag and when it captures your tag is able to detect where your vehicle has been anywhere in the United States where there are flock cameras. If you're in Georgia and you travel to New York, every time your vehicle tag gets captured by a flock camera, it is entered into a database and they are able to track it.”

Wall Street Apes

329,561 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I see a lot of people making this mistake on the treadmill. Setting the incline WAYYYYYY to high then having to hold on for dear life in case they fall off. This is taking away from your bodyweight of which your upper body is about 55% of your mass. My advice swing your hands so that you are always within touching distance if you need to grab on. Or even drop the incline and or the speed of travel until you are at a safe enough level you don’t need to hold on. Costing yourself effort by holding on.
0:32

I see a lot of people making this mistake on the treadmill. Setting the incline WAYYYYYY to high then having to hold on for dear life in case they fall off. This is taking away from your bodyweight of which your upper body is about 55% of your mass. My advice swing your hands so that you are always within touching distance if you need to grab on. Or even drop the incline and or the speed of travel until you are at a safe enough level you don’t need to hold on. Costing yourself effort by holding on.

Coach Benjamin Yeezus

13,266 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."
3:11

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,455 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ever go to a country and find out they may have a weird custom or practice that you aren’t used to? If you go to Japan and get a phone to use or purchase, it will function like a normal phone. However even if you silence it or put it on vibrate only, when you try to take a video or a picture, the phone will still make a shutter sound. It’s against the law in Japan for manufacturers to sell a phone there that doesn’t make these sounds when using a camera. They do this so whenever people take pictures of others, the sound can alert others in case they were trying to do it in secret because they were trying to take provocative photos of women in public. Do you agree with this practice, should other countries follow suit?
0:57

Ever go to a country and find out they may have a weird custom or practice that you aren’t used to? If you go to Japan and get a phone to use or purchase, it will function like a normal phone. However even if you silence it or put it on vibrate only, when you try to take a video or a picture, the phone will still make a shutter sound. It’s against the law in Japan for manufacturers to sell a phone there that doesn’t make these sounds when using a camera. They do this so whenever people take pictures of others, the sound can alert others in case they were trying to do it in secret because they were trying to take provocative photos of women in public. Do you agree with this practice, should other countries follow suit?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

86,950 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

John Cena says most people don't know how insurance works and he had to pay $500,000 out of his pocket to wrestle his farewell tour "The biggest hurdle to climb is insurance and insurance is super pricey...every day the cost goes up whether it be $500k or $1M because you're in the ring" "a lot of folks don't understand it's like but you have the weekends off you can do this or like they can they can shoot Tuesday through Saturday if they want you can do every Monday" "But the liability is with a high variable that I could get hurt. If I get hurt I can't come back to shoot or like if I get my nose broke or if I get a black eye or something"
1:34

John Cena says most people don't know how insurance works and he had to pay $500,000 out of his pocket to wrestle his farewell tour "The biggest hurdle to climb is insurance and insurance is super pricey...every day the cost goes up whether it be $500k or $1M because you're in the ring" "a lot of folks don't understand it's like but you have the weekends off you can do this or like they can they can shoot Tuesday through Saturday if they want you can do every Monday" "But the liability is with a high variable that I could get hurt. If I get hurt I can't come back to shoot or like if I get my nose broke or if I get a black eye or something"

CreativeDude

563,780 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

You are about to lose some brain cells… Theo Von now suggests that America is owned by Israel or another foreign or corporate power: “You don’t really know what’s going on… and if they would just say hey America is a country that is owned by Israel or that it’s always been just this outpost or it’s this LLC of Israel… or maybe not even of Israel it could just be of corporate entities… but if they would just tell us, then you can operate from a place of knowing what’s going on.”
1:14

You are about to lose some brain cells… Theo Von now suggests that America is owned by Israel or another foreign or corporate power: “You don’t really know what’s going on… and if they would just say hey America is a country that is owned by Israel or that it’s always been just this outpost or it’s this LLC of Israel… or maybe not even of Israel it could just be of corporate entities… but if they would just tell us, then you can operate from a place of knowing what’s going on.”

Open Source Intel

274,848 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The IRS is giving you a 100% write-off for buying Bitcoin miners. Under current tax law, Bitcoin mining hardware qualifies for 100% bonus depreciation. That means if you are a business owner or investor, you can write off the entire cost of your miners this year. Keep in mind, it is for the year they are placed in service. So if you are planning to capture a deduction on your April 2027 tax bill, your miners need to be hashing prior to December 31, 2026. If you have capital gains, passive income, or just a big tax bill, this is one of the most sophisticated ways to achieve a write-off and achieve Bitcoin exposure. If you are serious about building wealth and reducing your tax burden, this is the move.
0:28

The IRS is giving you a 100% write-off for buying Bitcoin miners. Under current tax law, Bitcoin mining hardware qualifies for 100% bonus depreciation. That means if you are a business owner or investor, you can write off the entire cost of your miners this year. Keep in mind, it is for the year they are placed in service. So if you are planning to capture a deduction on your April 2027 tax bill, your miners need to be hashing prior to December 31, 2026. If you have capital gains, passive income, or just a big tax bill, this is one of the most sophisticated ways to achieve a write-off and achieve Bitcoin exposure. If you are serious about building wealth and reducing your tax burden, this is the move.

Simple Mining

73,907 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

New Orleans Police secretly monitoring law abiding citizens with facial recognition cameras throughout the city “Wow, the police have gone too far with this one. In New Orleans, facial recognition is being used to monitor everyday people and compare them with wanted suspects or people around crime scenes. Not only are cameras in New Orleans being used to identify people with facial recognition, meaning that they're scanning people 24/7. You walk around, your face is being scanned. Not only is that the problem, but also this facial recognition system that the New Orleans Police Department is using and is actually pinging police officers phones as it scans and recognizes people that are either wanted or committed a crime or are a suspect of doing something worth monitoring and worth being notified about. I don't know about you, but as somebody who cares about my privacy, my security, this whole new world of facial recognition, biometric scanning, all of this stuff, it seems to be going a little bit too far. We already know facial recognition struggles to really identify people, especially people of color. So know that these, these technologies are very new. There's going to be a lot of nuances and a lot of people are not informed. If you are in New Orleans or you're around any major city, you better assume that this technology is being used against you. And if you're a regular, everyday, law abiding citizen, you have the opportunity to protect yourself now before other people really even catch on to this. — There is literally no better time to start protecting your privacy now and understanding facial recognition biometric, because this is where the entire world is headed.”
1:41

New Orleans Police secretly monitoring law abiding citizens with facial recognition cameras throughout the city “Wow, the police have gone too far with this one. In New Orleans, facial recognition is being used to monitor everyday people and compare them with wanted suspects or people around crime scenes. Not only are cameras in New Orleans being used to identify people with facial recognition, meaning that they're scanning people 24/7. You walk around, your face is being scanned. Not only is that the problem, but also this facial recognition system that the New Orleans Police Department is using and is actually pinging police officers phones as it scans and recognizes people that are either wanted or committed a crime or are a suspect of doing something worth monitoring and worth being notified about. I don't know about you, but as somebody who cares about my privacy, my security, this whole new world of facial recognition, biometric scanning, all of this stuff, it seems to be going a little bit too far. We already know facial recognition struggles to really identify people, especially people of color. So know that these, these technologies are very new. There's going to be a lot of nuances and a lot of people are not informed. If you are in New Orleans or you're around any major city, you better assume that this technology is being used against you. And if you're a regular, everyday, law abiding citizen, you have the opportunity to protect yourself now before other people really even catch on to this. — There is literally no better time to start protecting your privacy now and understanding facial recognition biometric, because this is where the entire world is headed.”

Wall Street Apes

52,133 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

your original birth certificate has a stamped number on it. that's a bond number. that bond number is traded on the stock market. the value of that bond number on the market is your value to them - which is commensurate with the amount of wealth they have stolen from you. that's called your minor estate. you can bitch all you want about whether nesara is a real thing or not - I could care less. one way or the other, this will all be sorted out. if I know, you know. If you know, then you can bet your ass they know that we all know. ncswic is not a tagline. you can take that to the bank.
0:59

your original birth certificate has a stamped number on it. that's a bond number. that bond number is traded on the stock market. the value of that bond number on the market is your value to them - which is commensurate with the amount of wealth they have stolen from you. that's called your minor estate. you can bitch all you want about whether nesara is a real thing or not - I could care less. one way or the other, this will all be sorted out. if I know, you know. If you know, then you can bet your ass they know that we all know. ncswic is not a tagline. you can take that to the bank.

The Rubber Duck ™

2,976,179 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren