Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

California-based startup Mach Industries is developing a vertical-takeoff cruise missile demonstrator for the U.S. Army’s experimental Strategic Strike program, the company said March 4. ~ Aviation Week 🔗👇

35,396 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

JUST IN: 🇩🇪🇷🇺 Germany Is Building A 2,000+ Km Missile Hammer, Berlin Wants To Strike Deep Into Russia Germany is preparing to spend nearly €12 billion on long range strike weapons as Berlin rebuilds a deep strike capability it has largely lacked for decades. Here’s what Germany is buying, and what it wants to develop: 🇩🇪 German made cruise missiles: From 2027, Berlin plans to acquire cheaper, mass-produced long-range cruise missiles to rapidly expand its stockpile. 🇺🇸 U.S. made Tomahawks: Germany is also moving toward purchasing American Tomahawk cruise missiles, giving the Bundeswehr a proven long range precision strike capability. 🇩🇪🇬🇧 German British future missile: Germany and the UK are developing a next generation long range strike weapon intended to eventually exceed 2,000 km in range. This is the system Berlin wants to develop jointly rather than simply buy off the shelf. 🇺🇦 Ukraine has demonstrated how long range weapons can hit airfields, command centers, ammunition depots and logistics hubs far behind the front lines. German military leaders have warned that Russia could potentially be capable of attacking NATO by the end of the decade. 🔥 Germany is pursuing domestic production, American Tomahawks and a future European 2,000+ km strike weapon, giving Berlin a much longer reach across Europe. The era of Germany having limited long range strike power may be coming to an end.

War Radar

58,270 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 WHY THE UNITED STATES HALTED A PLANNED STRIKE ON IRAN United States prepared and then halted a military strike on Iran point to a calculated decision rooted in U.S. national interest, risk management, and strategic restraint rather than weakness. 1. Avoiding a Wider War That Would Hurt U.S. Interests U.S. defense planners assessed that a direct strike on Iran could rapidly escalate into a regional conflict. Iran has the ability to retaliate through missile attacks, proxy forces, and disruption of global energy routes. Such an escalation would place U.S. troops, allies, and global markets at serious risk. From a U.S. perspective, a controlled environment is preferable to an open ended war. 2. No Clear Strategic Gain from Immediate Military Action Senior U.S. officials reportedly questioned whether a strike would achieve a decisive outcome. Without a clear path to degrading Iran’s long term capabilities or changing its behavior, a limited attack risked becoming symbolic rather than strategically effective. U.S. military doctrine prioritizes actions that deliver measurable and lasting advantages. 3. Protection of U.S. Forces and Bases in the Region Iran and its aligned groups have demonstrated the capability to strike U.S. bases across the Middle East. Intelligence assessments likely warned that even a limited U.S. strike would trigger retaliation against American personnel. Preventing American casualties remains a top political and military priority in Washington. 4. Pressure from U.S. Partners and Allies Key U.S. partners in the Middle East reportedly urged caution. Gulf states and European allies warned that a strike could destabilize the region, threaten shipping lanes, and damage energy security. The United States weighed these concerns heavily, recognizing that alliance stability is a core pillar of American global power. 5. Strategic Signaling Without Pulling the Trigger By preparing a strike and then halting it, Washington still sent a clear deterrence message. The U.S. demonstrated readiness, capability, and resolve while retaining escalation control. This approach aligns with U.S. strategy of applying pressure without rushing into irreversible military action. The halt was not a retreat. It was a deliberate choice to protect American lives, preserve strategic leverage, and avoid a conflict that could spiral beyond control. The United States kept military options on the table while choosing a timing and method that best serves long term U.S. security interests.

Defense Intelligence

52,246 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🇵🇱 Poland is weaponizing its domestic industry for a massive conflict by striking a deal to build thousands of cheap, long-range American Barracuda cruise missiles every year. This massive production run creates a nightmare scenario for Moscow, giving Warsaw the independent firepower to strike targets deep inside Russian territory. ✅ The giant of the Polish defense industry, the company Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa, plans to master the production of the Barracuda-500M cruise missile developed by the American company Anduril. 🔻 Signing the corresponding agreement with Anduril is a highly important event for the Polish military industry. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated that this is "bad news for Mordor," implying Russia. It is planned to jointly produce several thousand Barracuda-500Ms annually. 🔻 The Barracuda-500M is a small-sized cruise missile designed for mass production and is distinguished by its low cost compared to counterparts. The warhead is 45 kg, but the flight range reaches 900 km when launched from an aircraft. The Barracuda-500M can also be launched from a ground launcher using a rocket booster, though in this case, the flight range drops to 700 km. The Poles plan to use Barracuda-500M cruise missiles from F-16 and F-35 fighter jets. This industrial leap completely alters Eastern Europe's military balance by removing the cost barrier of traditional cruise missiles. By turning F-16s and F-35s into ultra-long-range launchpads capable of reaching 900 km, Poland is surrounding "Mordor" with a cheap, un-interceptable swarm of precision weapons, making any potential Kremlin aggression a suicidal move. Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

189,900 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce