正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

CALL RECORDING PART 2 More parts will be uploaded with time. @Im_MaazKhan Some people don’t need to introduce themselves. Their character does it for them. Her brother humiliated girls here. He harassed them. He asked for nudes. That is what she should have looked at before picking up the...

20,937 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is how ICE/Border Patrol retaliates when U.S. citizens dare to question them. A woman is sitting in her car in her own neighborhood. An ICE/Border Patrol agent comes to her window. She calmly asks a basic question, “What are you doing in my neighborhood?” His response, “I can do whatever I need to do.” She says, “No, you don’t. Record this” And that’s when it happens. The moment she tells someone to record, the agent turns to his coworkers and says, “Guys, let’s find out their status.” Let that sink in. No suspicion. No probable cause. No crime. Just punishment for speaking up. She says, “Be my guest,” and identifies them out loud, “Everyone, this is ICE.” Now the agent comes back, demanding, “What is your legal status?” She refuses. Correctly. Calmly. Repeatedly. “I don’t have to answer that.” He insists anyway. He starts to say, “I have…” then stops himself. Because he knows he doesn’t have anything. No warrant. No authority. No legal basis. This is intimidation. This is retaliation. This is ICE using the threat of detention as a weapon against civilians who observe them, film them, or question them. When she tells him he should be ashamed, he deflects with the same tired propaganda, “Oh, for all the sex offenders we’ve arrested.” She challenges him, “Show me one. Show me one you have arrested.” And suddenly, he walks away. Because this was never about public safety. It was about silencing her. ICE does this over and over again, If you film them, they threaten you. If you ask questions, they demand your “status.” If you assert your rights, they escalate. This is not law enforcement. This is a federal agency punishing people for exercising their constitutional rights. Film them. Know your rights. That’s the part that scares them most.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,122,678 次观看 • 8 个月前

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,553 次观看 • 2 个月前

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 次观看 • 3 个月前

My God. This will make you cry. Get a tissue. The most shocking part is Muizzu’s cruel and angry response. This poor woman shouts at Muthalib and Muizzu cause they changed her disabled relative’s flat points from 82 to 74 and as a result, did not give them a flat while others with same points, including some people she knew, were given one. She says she will touch the Qur’an and repeat what she said and also reminds Muizzu and his team that death can come at any time, and that he can never be certain he will even be reelected. She tells him to stop repeatedly blaming the previous gov. She explains that after many attempts to contact the President’s Office, an official finally told her that her relative could apply for a flat in the next round. But how is that fair, when in the next round her relative will lose more points cause their children will turn 18, while the condition of the house remains exactly the same, leaking water and all. After more than four minutes of speaking, pouring out her frustration with intense emotion, she finally begs, her voice cracking, completely hopeless, also knowing her time is up. She knows she is just an ordinary person and has no power to change anything. She asks Muizzu: “Kommeves javaabeh dhevvabala Raees alhugadah.” Then Muizzu’s response is unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable. He dismisses everything she says and in front of everyone, essentially calls her a liar. Yet what she said is something the whole country knows. The whole country knows that the Housing Ministry manipulated the flat allocation points to give flats to the people they wanted. She was simply the one who had the courage to say it out loud, directly to him. And this is how he responded. Muizzu is a pathological liar. He can never be trusted. 2.5 years remaining.

Hassan Kurusee

29,070 次观看 • 8 个月前