正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Calling Motability “free cars for ADHD” is not only misleading, it completely misrepresents how the scheme works. You don't get a Motability vehicle simply because you have an ADHD diagnosis. You have to qualify for the relevant enhanced mobility benefit, and disabled people exchange that benefit to lease a...

WheelieFUMS's profile picture

Wheelie MS Advocate - #PoweredByExperience - ♿️

4,093 subscribers

15,347 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

15 条评论

Amanda Ford💙🍏☮️🪁 的头像
Amanda Ford💙🍏☮️🪁22 天前

Can’t she be challenged under harassment and discrimination against the disabled laws ?

Fiona McLeod 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 的头像
Fiona McLeod 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿22 天前

Shes been told over and over by many ,including myself how Motability works. She chooses to continue posting lies..

Rachel Morgan 的头像
Rachel Morgan22 天前

What is it with her disinformation

Shirley-Ann 的头像
Shirley-Ann22 天前

She’s a Tory they can’t stop themselves from lying!!

G.K. Thompson 的头像
G.K. Thompson22 天前

@Helen_Whately doesn't care.

Derek Turpin #PAPA 的头像
Derek Turpin #PAPA22 天前

Helen is what I would normally call disingenuous! But today a Spade is a Spade and she is a frigging LIAR! And she knows it

Alpha065 的头像
Alpha06522 天前

Awful woman on almost £100k per year and one of the highest expenses claims in parliament

🕊 ⚖️ Bo Peep 的头像
🕊 ⚖️ Bo Peep21 天前

Helen is deliberately misleading her audience That’s evil

PDSmx 🇫🇮🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🏴‍☠️ 的头像
PDSmx 🇫🇮🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🏴‍☠️21 天前

Nobody with ADHD needs a free car. Free cars in general are a ludicrous fringe benefit the likes of which there is virtually no equivalent of in any other country.

Phil Humber 的头像
Phil Humber21 天前

She also has ZERO clue how much scrapping Motability would cost both GDP, jobs...price of 2nd cars etc. Also now with BMW etc gone, Motability flooding with Chinese EV's that no one wants 2nd hand as the price bombs, losing more money for the Treasury..these people.....🤬

Liz 的头像
Liz22 天前

It's strange that she thinks people would believe anyone would get a car for ADHD to begin with

wuyize147fan 的头像
wuyize147fan22 天前

I am sick of all these political insult against disability. Enough is enough. Let's hope these mps don't fall into disabilities one day of their own

Remember your a Womble 的头像
Remember your a Womble21 天前

Why is it that the fact it’s a charity patroned by the king is always left out

anton Simpson ♿🧠 的头像
anton Simpson ♿🧠22 天前

What medication is Helen Whatley on because it's not doing her any good

Pushk1n 的头像
Pushk1n21 天前

Given her own personal arrangements and extensive expenses?

相关视频

You’ve done it again, haven’t you? Another week, another headline crafted to rile the masses — suggesting disabled people are being handed luxury cars, completely free, courtesy of the taxpayer. All thanks to that lavish and opulent system you love to whisper about: The Motability Scheme. Honestly, the only thing more predictable than this storyline is the fact that none of you seem to bother fact-checking it. Take this whopper as an example. Peddling the usual Narratives that if you say the right thing on a phone call, you’ll get given a sparkling new BMW. What did the host do to challenge that? Absolutely nothing LBC News LBC
1:04

You’ve done it again, haven’t you? Another week, another headline crafted to rile the masses — suggesting disabled people are being handed luxury cars, completely free, courtesy of the taxpayer. All thanks to that lavish and opulent system you love to whisper about: The Motability Scheme. Honestly, the only thing more predictable than this storyline is the fact that none of you seem to bother fact-checking it. Take this whopper as an example. Peddling the usual Narratives that if you say the right thing on a phone call, you’ll get given a sparkling new BMW. What did the host do to challenge that? Absolutely nothing LBC News LBC

Emma Dolan

34,898 次观看 • 1 年前

Kevin Bridges mocks Labour's assault on the disabled: "They after disabled people? Single parents. That takes balls." "And through disabled people's doors. This is your fault, mate. You" "We could go after tax, avoid multinationals" "We could go after Vodafone, Starbucks, Amazon, Google" "But it's your fault, You" "You're going back to work, mate" "We don't give a how disabled you are" "Oh you're paralysed from the neck down? We don't give" "There will be a farm out there looking for a scarecrow"
0:32

Kevin Bridges mocks Labour's assault on the disabled: "They after disabled people? Single parents. That takes balls." "And through disabled people's doors. This is your fault, mate. You" "We could go after tax, avoid multinationals" "We could go after Vodafone, Starbucks, Amazon, Google" "But it's your fault, You" "You're going back to work, mate" "We don't give a how disabled you are" "Oh you're paralysed from the neck down? We don't give" "There will be a farm out there looking for a scarecrow"

Farrukh

408,297 次观看 • 1 年前

ULEZ is expanding across all London boroughs from the 29 August this year to help clear London's air. Those in receipt of certain disability benefits currently qualify for a temporary 100% discount. So do disabled people whose vehicles are registered with the DVLA as having disabled or disabled passenger vehicle tax class. There are also exemptions and temporary discounts for certain wheelchair-accessible vehicles, minibuses used for community transport, historic vehicles and some other vehicles too. Eligible NHS patients may also be able to claim back the charge after they've paid. Remember: if your vehicle is registered for an exemption or temporary discount you may still need to pay the ULEZ charge if you drive a different vehicle that doesn't meet the ULEZ emission standards in the zone. 9 out of 10 cars seen driving in outer London already meet the ULEZ emission standards, based on monthly average compliance levels. If you find that your vehicle is not compliant you can check whether you are eligible for the vehicle scrappage scheme. 🔗 Check ULEZ discounts and exemptions
1:19

ULEZ is expanding across all London boroughs from the 29 August this year to help clear London's air. Those in receipt of certain disability benefits currently qualify for a temporary 100% discount. So do disabled people whose vehicles are registered with the DVLA as having disabled or disabled passenger vehicle tax class. There are also exemptions and temporary discounts for certain wheelchair-accessible vehicles, minibuses used for community transport, historic vehicles and some other vehicles too. Eligible NHS patients may also be able to claim back the charge after they've paid. Remember: if your vehicle is registered for an exemption or temporary discount you may still need to pay the ULEZ charge if you drive a different vehicle that doesn't meet the ULEZ emission standards in the zone. 9 out of 10 cars seen driving in outer London already meet the ULEZ emission standards, based on monthly average compliance levels. If you find that your vehicle is not compliant you can check whether you are eligible for the vehicle scrappage scheme. 🔗 Check ULEZ discounts and exemptions

TfL

123,251 次观看 • 3 年前

The person of interest in the double homicides of Clinton and Cristen Brink MAY be in custody as a high speed chase ended in Redfield, AR with a man in taken into custody. As you can see in the video the disabled vehicle is a black Mazda and you can also see an officer carrying a spike strip which may have been used to disable the vehicle. I have not seen an official announcement from LE, but this looks promising.
0:21

The person of interest in the double homicides of Clinton and Cristen Brink MAY be in custody as a high speed chase ended in Redfield, AR with a man in taken into custody. As you can see in the video the disabled vehicle is a black Mazda and you can also see an officer carrying a spike strip which may have been used to disable the vehicle. I have not seen an official announcement from LE, but this looks promising.

Defense Diaries

55,964 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025
0:58

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,738,826 次观看 • 1 年前

"We don't run sh*t. The Black political class in the Southeast runs us with an absolute hand, and if you get in the way of that money, they got somewhere to sit your a** down for a few years. And if you have a reputation, they've been ruining each other's reputation in politics for so long, don't you think they know how to ruin our reputation? ... Our behavior is an embarrassment to them, and it loses them political equity, real equity and money. Atlanta should be treated by Black people like Mecca is to Muslims. This is 124 years of excellence." - Killer Mike
3:48

"We don't run sh*t. The Black political class in the Southeast runs us with an absolute hand, and if you get in the way of that money, they got somewhere to sit your a** down for a few years. And if you have a reputation, they've been ruining each other's reputation in politics for so long, don't you think they know how to ruin our reputation? ... Our behavior is an embarrassment to them, and it loses them political equity, real equity and money. Atlanta should be treated by Black people like Mecca is to Muslims. This is 124 years of excellence." - Killer Mike

Club Shay Shay

90,803 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023
1:05

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

ELON CLIPS

33,631 次观看 • 1 年前

Why Bending Spoons eliminated all job titles: “At some point, we were looking for ways to streamline and simplify, and someone said, ‘Why do we even have titles? What's the benefit of titles?’” “Let's not be arrogant. There's probably some benefit. What's that benefit? We ultimately determined that the benefit was that people needed titles for bragging rights.” “So we just got rid of titles and told people, ‘You can pick your title for your CV, LinkedIn, whatever. We don't need to know. We don't want to know. We don't need to approve it. We don't want to see it. Just don't embarrass us." “If you're a new hire, don't say you're the CTO because then people will question our integrity as a company. But as long as it's broadly reasonable, we're good. We have never reintroduced them again. We don't have any titles.” “We never looked back. We probably saved easily hundreds if not thousands of person-hours in terms of defining different terms and having emotionally draining discussions with people. Never had a problem, not a single instance of someone complaining that we didn't formally assign to them a title ever out of, at this point, many hundreds, actually multiple thousands of people.”
3:13

Why Bending Spoons eliminated all job titles: “At some point, we were looking for ways to streamline and simplify, and someone said, ‘Why do we even have titles? What's the benefit of titles?’” “Let's not be arrogant. There's probably some benefit. What's that benefit? We ultimately determined that the benefit was that people needed titles for bragging rights.” “So we just got rid of titles and told people, ‘You can pick your title for your CV, LinkedIn, whatever. We don't need to know. We don't want to know. We don't need to approve it. We don't want to see it. Just don't embarrass us." “If you're a new hire, don't say you're the CTO because then people will question our integrity as a company. But as long as it's broadly reasonable, we're good. We have never reintroduced them again. We don't have any titles.” “We never looked back. We probably saved easily hundreds if not thousands of person-hours in terms of defining different terms and having emotionally draining discussions with people. Never had a problem, not a single instance of someone complaining that we didn't formally assign to them a title ever out of, at this point, many hundreds, actually multiple thousands of people.”

David Senra

259,548 次观看 • 14 天前

Congressman Brandon Gill “The American people do not have any obligation, constitutionally or otherwise to import people from foreign cultures” Read that, and then read it again Constitutionally we do not have any obligation to accept any immigration “Our immigrate, the purpose of our immigration policy is to benefit the American people. There's no other reason it exists. We do not have any obligation to allow anybody to come into our country. We do so on our own terms and for the benefit of our own people, and to the extent that that is not benefiting the American people, I think it ought to be immigration policy ought to be reformed or scrapped.” I vote to completely scrap it. End immigration, unless it’s the very best. The only reason this mass immigration has happened is because we’ve been sold out
0:30

Congressman Brandon Gill “The American people do not have any obligation, constitutionally or otherwise to import people from foreign cultures” Read that, and then read it again Constitutionally we do not have any obligation to accept any immigration “Our immigrate, the purpose of our immigration policy is to benefit the American people. There's no other reason it exists. We do not have any obligation to allow anybody to come into our country. We do so on our own terms and for the benefit of our own people, and to the extent that that is not benefiting the American people, I think it ought to be immigration policy ought to be reformed or scrapped.” I vote to completely scrap it. End immigration, unless it’s the very best. The only reason this mass immigration has happened is because we’ve been sold out

Wall Street Apes

163,486 次观看 • 4 个月前

Here's an easy way to prove the progressive Left wrong about what "rights" we have: would you be arrested for exercising that right yourself? If so, then it's NOT a God-given, Constitutionally protected right. Not for you, and especially not for the government. Could you force your neighbor to pay for or provide your healthcare? Nope. Then "free healthcare" isn't a right. Could you force your neighbor to give you housing? Nope. Then "housing" isn't a right either. Could you walk up to your neighbor's kids and expose them to something their parents don't want them to see? I REALLY wouldn't recommend trying it. Because parental rights ARE real rights, no matter how much the Left says otherwise. They may not be mentioned in the Constitution, but that's exactly why we have the Ninth Amendment: Just because it isn't listed here doesn't mean it doesn't exist. But that only applies to REAL unalienable rights. The progressives completely flipped the definition of a right. They told generations that the government gave us the rights TO things. The Founders said the opposite. They acknowledged that the government's primary job is to PROTECT our God-given rights, especially from government tyranny.
5:44

Here's an easy way to prove the progressive Left wrong about what "rights" we have: would you be arrested for exercising that right yourself? If so, then it's NOT a God-given, Constitutionally protected right. Not for you, and especially not for the government. Could you force your neighbor to pay for or provide your healthcare? Nope. Then "free healthcare" isn't a right. Could you force your neighbor to give you housing? Nope. Then "housing" isn't a right either. Could you walk up to your neighbor's kids and expose them to something their parents don't want them to see? I REALLY wouldn't recommend trying it. Because parental rights ARE real rights, no matter how much the Left says otherwise. They may not be mentioned in the Constitution, but that's exactly why we have the Ninth Amendment: Just because it isn't listed here doesn't mean it doesn't exist. But that only applies to REAL unalienable rights. The progressives completely flipped the definition of a right. They told generations that the government gave us the rights TO things. The Founders said the opposite. They acknowledged that the government's primary job is to PROTECT our God-given rights, especially from government tyranny.

Glenn Beck

75,957 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️
4:47

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️

GP Q

616,739 次观看 • 2 年前

Why can’t politicians just answer simple questions about their job? Sophy Ridge asked Defence Secretary Wes Streeting a straightforward question he should have been ready for. You’d expect the person in charge of defence to have a clear position on the spending target for his own department, yet he repeatedly dodged it. She asked if he agreed with his predecessor John Healey, who said he was certain Britain should reach 3% of GDP on defence by 2030: “Are you also certain about 3% of GDP by 2030? Is that a target?” Streeting: “I endorsed John Healey’s resignation letter wholeheartedly at the time. What you will see from Andy Burnham and John Healey as prime minister and chancellor is a commitment to make sure the defence investment plan is fully funded.” That’s not an answer. Sophy cut in: “I’m going to have to come in again. You are the Defence Secretary, do you believe in the target of spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030?” He again referred back to agreeing with Healey and then talked at length about setting out “what we will fund and how we will fund it.” Still no direct answer. Clearly frustrated, Sophy tried once more: “I’m not asking you to set out how you’re going to fund it. I’m asking, do you believe in the target that we should be spending 3% by 2030?” His reply? He wouldn’t answer because the next question would be about how to fund it. That is a ridiculous reason to refuse a basic question about your own brief. Just answer it. Absolutely pathetic.
1:44

Why can’t politicians just answer simple questions about their job? Sophy Ridge asked Defence Secretary Wes Streeting a straightforward question he should have been ready for. You’d expect the person in charge of defence to have a clear position on the spending target for his own department, yet he repeatedly dodged it. She asked if he agreed with his predecessor John Healey, who said he was certain Britain should reach 3% of GDP on defence by 2030: “Are you also certain about 3% of GDP by 2030? Is that a target?” Streeting: “I endorsed John Healey’s resignation letter wholeheartedly at the time. What you will see from Andy Burnham and John Healey as prime minister and chancellor is a commitment to make sure the defence investment plan is fully funded.” That’s not an answer. Sophy cut in: “I’m going to have to come in again. You are the Defence Secretary, do you believe in the target of spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030?” He again referred back to agreeing with Healey and then talked at length about setting out “what we will fund and how we will fund it.” Still no direct answer. Clearly frustrated, Sophy tried once more: “I’m not asking you to set out how you’re going to fund it. I’m asking, do you believe in the target that we should be spending 3% by 2030?” His reply? He wouldn’t answer because the next question would be about how to fund it. That is a ridiculous reason to refuse a basic question about your own brief. Just answer it. Absolutely pathetic.

J Stewart

41,512 次观看 • 2 个月前

"As a nation, do we have a database? Because, for security forces to work, for the police to work, we need to have a database. If you go abroad and you commit an offence, it's easier for you to be identified. They get your face, fingerprints, signature, or your picture because they know everything about you. Do we have that? What is delaying us from putting that in place?" — Christopher Musa, minister of defence
4:57

"As a nation, do we have a database? Because, for security forces to work, for the police to work, we need to have a database. If you go abroad and you commit an offence, it's easier for you to be identified. They get your face, fingerprints, signature, or your picture because they know everything about you. Do we have that? What is delaying us from putting that in place?" — Christopher Musa, minister of defence

TheCable

232,985 次观看 • 2 个月前

This post has over 38k likes, “There has to be more to life than this” “Does anybody else find it insane that the majority of us spend our days at a job that we don't particularly want to be at just to collect a paycheck big enough to pay our bills and pay our taxes and whatever else we need to literally survive? And then you come home in the evening and you only have a couple hours to yourself before you have to go to bed and then do it all over again. And you arrive to the weekend and it's beautiful because you don't have to go into work, but it's over in a blimp and then you're right back onto the same cycle. There has to be more to life than this — There has to be more to life than this. Does anybody else feel this way?”
0:41

This post has over 38k likes, “There has to be more to life than this” “Does anybody else find it insane that the majority of us spend our days at a job that we don't particularly want to be at just to collect a paycheck big enough to pay our bills and pay our taxes and whatever else we need to literally survive? And then you come home in the evening and you only have a couple hours to yourself before you have to go to bed and then do it all over again. And you arrive to the weekend and it's beautiful because you don't have to go into work, but it's over in a blimp and then you're right back onto the same cycle. There has to be more to life than this — There has to be more to life than this. Does anybody else feel this way?”

Wall Street Apes

1,536,721 次观看 • 1 年前

FaZe Banks asks a billionaire for his best advice to young people Tushar Jain: “I don't think how smart you are is going to matter” “I don't think intelligence matters anymore. I don't think it's economically an important input for humans” “Between the Industrial Revolution and the AI revolution, how smart you were was a major input into how much money you were going to make” “I think it's going to be agents. It's your ability to make up your own mind and then be relentless in the pursuit of the thing that you want” “You have intelligence for free... but you know what's not free is motivation. You know what's not free is being relentless and dedicated” FaZe Banks: “AI has replaced IQ”
2:13

FaZe Banks asks a billionaire for his best advice to young people Tushar Jain: “I don't think how smart you are is going to matter” “I don't think intelligence matters anymore. I don't think it's economically an important input for humans” “Between the Industrial Revolution and the AI revolution, how smart you were was a major input into how much money you were going to make” “I think it's going to be agents. It's your ability to make up your own mind and then be relentless in the pursuit of the thing that you want” “You have intelligence for free... but you know what's not free is motivation. You know what's not free is being relentless and dedicated” FaZe Banks: “AI has replaced IQ”

Market Bubble

47,757 次观看 • 1 个月前