Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Calling this a "war crime" is pure fearmongering. Under ICRC Rule 10, strikes on infrastructure used for military purposes are permitted. Civilians are NOT the target. Grifters just bank on their audience being too stupid to notice.

scrowder's profile picture

Steven Crowder

2,545,840 subscribers

531,095 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

War in #Ukraine is having deepening impact on civilians. Under international humanitarian law, civilians and civilian infrastructure are strictly protected. Any such deliberate attack is a war crime. These attacks must stop.
1:38

War in #Ukraine is having deepening impact on civilians. Under international humanitarian law, civilians and civilian infrastructure are strictly protected. Any such deliberate attack is a war crime. These attacks must stop.

UN Human Rights

51,190 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Owen Jones: "British military bases are being used by the Americans to wage their illegal war on Iran. We've got to stop claiming we're not involved in this war. We already are" 🎯
1:13

.Owen Jones: "British military bases are being used by the Americans to wage their illegal war on Iran. We've got to stop claiming we're not involved in this war. We already are" 🎯

Saul Staniforth

63,439 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

ICRC President Mirjana Spoljaric addresses the UN Security Council in New York, calling on states to turn their rhetoric support for international humanitarian law into action. It is possible to protect civilians in war. ➡️
1:32

ICRC President Mirjana Spoljaric addresses the UN Security Council in New York, calling on states to turn their rhetoric support for international humanitarian law into action. It is possible to protect civilians in war. ➡️

ICRC

23,741 просмотров • 1 год назад

TAPPER: Are you not concerned that Trump's proposed strikes on civilian infrastructure would constitute a war crime? CHRIS WRIGHT: The president is looking for maximum leverage. No, I'm not worried about that.
0:56

TAPPER: Are you not concerned that Trump's proposed strikes on civilian infrastructure would constitute a war crime? CHRIS WRIGHT: The president is looking for maximum leverage. No, I'm not worried about that.

Aaron Rupar

39,394 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Anna Paulina Luna: “It is not the intention of the U.S. Government to invade…Targeted strategic military strikes and invasions are two totally different things.” Catherine Rampell: “They’re calling it a war. The President called it a war.” Luna: “Strategic strikes are not war.”
2:47

Anna Paulina Luna: “It is not the intention of the U.S. Government to invade…Targeted strategic military strikes and invasions are two totally different things.” Catherine Rampell: “They’re calling it a war. The President called it a war.” Luna: “Strategic strikes are not war.”

The Bulwark

174,469 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

What is the Canada Infrastructure Bank hiding? They claim to be “transparent” yet key people are refusing to testify at committee on their ties to McKinsey, evading scrutiny & wasting public resources. Conservatives are putting Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) on notice. They will answer.
1:01

What is the Canada Infrastructure Bank hiding? They claim to be “transparent” yet key people are refusing to testify at committee on their ties to McKinsey, evading scrutiny & wasting public resources. Conservatives are putting Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) on notice. They will answer.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

64,175 просмотров • 3 лет назад

"Israeli authorities are saying that [Hezbollah] has been using those bridges to send reinforcements to the south of the country. The reality is that these are civilian bridges, critical infrastructure belonging to the state and used by the civilian population." Here's a reality check, BBC News (UK): Once a civilian bridge is used for military purposes, it becomes a military target. Send your complaints about destroyed bridges to Hezbollah, not Israel.
0:22

"Israeli authorities are saying that [Hezbollah] has been using those bridges to send reinforcements to the south of the country. The reality is that these are civilian bridges, critical infrastructure belonging to the state and used by the civilian population." Here's a reality check, BBC News (UK): Once a civilian bridge is used for military purposes, it becomes a military target. Send your complaints about destroyed bridges to Hezbollah, not Israel.

HonestReporting

13,586 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Q: "Are you saying the U.S. is okay targeting civilians, the people of Iran?" Mike Waltz: "In the laws of land warfare and the rules of engagement, civil- any type of infrastructure that is being commingled, that is being used to move military hardware, is absolutely a legitimate target."
1:41

Q: "Are you saying the U.S. is okay targeting civilians, the people of Iran?" Mike Waltz: "In the laws of land warfare and the rules of engagement, civil- any type of infrastructure that is being commingled, that is being used to move military hardware, is absolutely a legitimate target."

The Bulwark

23,146 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Ukrainian commander Lt. Col. Dmytro Pulinets on the defense of Kherson: "There are a lot of civilians here. The enemy doesn't discriminate at all, they do not care who lives in this city. They do not distinguish between a military target and a civilian target... this is just terrorism. They are terrorising the city."
1:59

Ukrainian commander Lt. Col. Dmytro Pulinets on the defense of Kherson: "There are a lot of civilians here. The enemy doesn't discriminate at all, they do not care who lives in this city. They do not distinguish between a military target and a civilian target... this is just terrorism. They are terrorising the city."

MeidasClips

118,420 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Q: "Shouldn't the very first step be to end all U.S. access to British military bases for Trump's war in Iran?" PM Keir Starmer: "I've allowed the bases to be used for defensive purposes to prevent those attacks on our civilians…who are in the region."
1:22

Q: "Shouldn't the very first step be to end all U.S. access to British military bases for Trump's war in Iran?" PM Keir Starmer: "I've allowed the bases to be used for defensive purposes to prevent those attacks on our civilians…who are in the region."

Breaking911

46,255 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tapper: "Are you not concerned that [Trump's new] proposed strikes on civilian infrastructure…would constitute a war crime?" Energy Secretary Chris Wright: "The president is looking for maximum leverage in these negotiations…No, I am not worried about that."
0:57

Tapper: "Are you not concerned that [Trump's new] proposed strikes on civilian infrastructure…would constitute a war crime?" Energy Secretary Chris Wright: "The president is looking for maximum leverage in these negotiations…No, I am not worried about that."

The Bulwark

14,821 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Absolute humiliation for Israel. Their military spokesman is forced to admit on live TV that their multi billion dollar air defenses are failing against Iranian missiles. Now they are crying war crime because their Iron Dome is not air tight. The hubris is collapsing.
0:56

Absolute humiliation for Israel. Their military spokesman is forced to admit on live TV that their multi billion dollar air defenses are failing against Iranian missiles. Now they are crying war crime because their Iron Dome is not air tight. The hubris is collapsing.

Furkan Gözükara

539,465 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THERE IS A LINE BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AND WAR CRIMES. Former U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery says not all infrastructure strikes are created equal. Some rhetoric is designed purely for psychological effect. That's strategy. But collective punishment targeting civilian infrastructure to break a population crosses into war crime territory. The law is clear. The target must be legitimate. The intent must be military. Political posturing dressed up as military strategy doesn't make it legal. Mark Montgomery
3:19

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THERE IS A LINE BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AND WAR CRIMES. Former U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery says not all infrastructure strikes are created equal. Some rhetoric is designed purely for psychological effect. That's strategy. But collective punishment targeting civilian infrastructure to break a population crosses into war crime territory. The law is clear. The target must be legitimate. The intent must be military. Political posturing dressed up as military strategy doesn't make it legal. Mark Montgomery

Mario Nawfal

64,337 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

If you think killing civilians is a justified retaliation for military strikes, then you are morally bankrupt. That includes Trump & media that call the brutal strikes on Ukraine a counterattack. It’s not, it’s terrorism
2:04

If you think killing civilians is a justified retaliation for military strikes, then you are morally bankrupt. That includes Trump & media that call the brutal strikes on Ukraine a counterattack. It’s not, it’s terrorism

Caolan

67,947 просмотров • 1 год назад

Journalist Wajahat S. Khan has covered the Pakistani Army for years, including being embedded on various missions during the War on Terror. Analyzing footage from D-Square in Islamabad in which individuals can be seen on top of a building, from where civilians said bullets were being fired to target civilians, Wajahat Khan says, from his experience, “these are army personnel. 100% they are army men. Two spotters, and two snipers. They are using a range finder. Only the army has this equipment.” This analysis corroborates what many eyewitnesses including elected representatives and journalists have said, that snipers were used by the military government to target unarmed peaceful protesters. #IslamabadMassacre
1:51

Journalist Wajahat S. Khan has covered the Pakistani Army for years, including being embedded on various missions during the War on Terror. Analyzing footage from D-Square in Islamabad in which individuals can be seen on top of a building, from where civilians said bullets were being fired to target civilians, Wajahat Khan says, from his experience, “these are army personnel. 100% they are army men. Two spotters, and two snipers. They are using a range finder. Only the army has this equipment.” This analysis corroborates what many eyewitnesses including elected representatives and journalists have said, that snipers were used by the military government to target unarmed peaceful protesters. #IslamabadMassacre

PTI USA Official

88,922 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇮🇷 A WINDOW FOR REGIME CHANGE? Journalist Pouria Zeraati says the current strikes on Iran’s security infrastructure may have opened a rare moment of vulnerability for the regime. The objective is not just military damage but weakening the tools used to suppress citizens. With the regime’s military apparatus under pressure, the next move now depends on the opposition and the Iranian people. Pouria Zeraati
4:04

🚨🇮🇷 A WINDOW FOR REGIME CHANGE? Journalist Pouria Zeraati says the current strikes on Iran’s security infrastructure may have opened a rare moment of vulnerability for the regime. The objective is not just military damage but weakening the tools used to suppress citizens. With the regime’s military apparatus under pressure, the next move now depends on the opposition and the Iranian people. Pouria Zeraati

Mario Nawfal

89,460 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Under International Humanitarian Law the principle is clear: Hospitals are protected, because of their life-saving function for wounded & sick. Yes, they can lose their protection, but this is not a free license to attack. Cordula Droege, ICRC Chief Legal Officer, explains 👇
2:11

Under International Humanitarian Law the principle is clear: Hospitals are protected, because of their life-saving function for wounded & sick. Yes, they can lose their protection, but this is not a free license to attack. Cordula Droege, ICRC Chief Legal Officer, explains 👇

ICRC

416,313 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Ukrainian attack on a bus carrying civilians is not a tragic accident, it is a vile, deliberate, and inhumane crime — Russia's Commissioner for Human Rights Yana Lantratova 'There are no military objectives that could justify the bloodshed of civilians'
0:51

Ukrainian attack on a bus carrying civilians is not a tragic accident, it is a vile, deliberate, and inhumane crime — Russia's Commissioner for Human Rights Yana Lantratova 'There are no military objectives that could justify the bloodshed of civilians'

RT

15,585 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 NEW: Mike Waltz just SHUT DOWN ABC’s Jonathan Karl on the media’s fear-mongering ‘war crime’ narrative about President Trump’s military options in Iran. KARL: “Is he prepared to do what he threatened here?” “He said, destroy every power plant and every bridge in the country. Full on, in-depth war, extended in the Middle East. He’s ready for that?” WALTZ: “Well, all options are on the table. Absolutely.” “Unlike his predecessor, President Trump doesn’t publicly take options off the table and tell our adversaries what he’s not going to do, therefore giving them leverage.” “We could take that infrastructure out relatively easily. The Iranian air defenses have been absolutely decimated.” “And just to get ahead of a lot of the critics and hand-wringing, throwing out irresponsible terms like war crimes...attacking, destroying infrastructure that has clearly and historically been used for dual military purposes, is not a war crime.” “We’ve heard that from Democratic lawmakers and it is irresponsible and just flat wrong.”
2:23

🚨 NEW: Mike Waltz just SHUT DOWN ABC’s Jonathan Karl on the media’s fear-mongering ‘war crime’ narrative about President Trump’s military options in Iran. KARL: “Is he prepared to do what he threatened here?” “He said, destroy every power plant and every bridge in the country. Full on, in-depth war, extended in the Middle East. He’s ready for that?” WALTZ: “Well, all options are on the table. Absolutely.” “Unlike his predecessor, President Trump doesn’t publicly take options off the table and tell our adversaries what he’s not going to do, therefore giving them leverage.” “We could take that infrastructure out relatively easily. The Iranian air defenses have been absolutely decimated.” “And just to get ahead of a lot of the critics and hand-wringing, throwing out irresponsible terms like war crimes...attacking, destroying infrastructure that has clearly and historically been used for dual military purposes, is not a war crime.” “We’ve heard that from Democratic lawmakers and it is irresponsible and just flat wrong.”

TV News Now

172,950 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад