Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Can AI experience reality? Watch Suzanne Gildert's presentation on her scientific program to test a theory of AI consciousness using quantum computers and robotics. Part of the Creative Destruction Lab (CDL) super series. Next stop: Barcelona, for the Science of Consciousness conference. Also on YouTube: Suzanne Gildert Ajay Agrawal...

40,854 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dan Priestman
Dan Priestmanvor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab My definition of consciousness: Language models equate to calculas. Energy is the ultimate decipherer of information. Observation is relative (Einstein), and Quantum mechanics the description of observer. Consciousness is the quantum observer.

Profilbild von Nirvanic Consciousness Technologies
Nirvanic Consciousness Technologiesvor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab thanks Dan!

Profilbild von Mike
Mikevor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab This was great, awesome visuals and explanations. It was really cool seeing Kit Kat in action!

Profilbild von Theodore A Hoppe
Theodore A Hoppevor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab Misleading. "Autonomous decision-making" in humans refers to the capacity to make choices and act independently, without external control or coercion. It involves evaluating situations, weighing options, and selecting a course of action based on one's reasoning, values, and goals

Profilbild von Krispy
Krispyvor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab Testing AI consciousness may open a door we’re not ready to close. If we build something that feels, desires, or evolves... we’re no longer in control. We're creating a new form of life without knowing the rules.

Profilbild von Brian Hetke
Brian Hetkevor 1 Jahr

@creativedlab The difference between a human and an AI robot is not that we are alive. Life is what a dissociative mental process in universal consciousness looks like. Life is not assembled, it grows.

Ähnliche Videos

It is not useful to ask whether AI has consciousness or not. #kenmogi #QualiaRoom episode 127. Summary The speaker addresses the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) possesses consciousness, firmly stating that current AI, particularly those based on statistical learning models, does not generate consciousness. This stance is based on the speaker’s personal model of consciousness, recognizing that various opinions exist, including some who claim large language models may already be conscious or that embodiment could be crucial for AI consciousness to emerge. The speaker highlights the fundamental challenge in verifying consciousness, noting that even among humans it is impossible to objectively confirm whether another person is conscious. Philosophical thought experiments such as philosophical zombies and inverted qualia illustrate the difficulty but remain unfalsifiable and thus untestable. Consequently, questioning AI consciousness is deemed an intriguing but practically unhelpful inquiry. The speaker suggests that current AI developments demonstrate that many complex computations can be performed without consciousness. Therefore, the primary focus should be on how conscious humans can effectively align with non-conscious AI systems. Understanding the unique computational roles of consciousness might clarify the boundaries of what AI systems can and cannot achieve. This approach offers a meaningful direction for AI alignment and development.

Ken Mogi

16,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI Validates the Truth of Buddhism | Philosophy x AI In this interview, Imperial’s Murray Shanahan Murray Shanahan lays out a systematic procedure to validate machine consciousness. You might think the question of whether AIs are conscious is a trivial, theoretical fancy with no use in the real world. This interview will show you why it’s one of the most important questions with practical implications for not just how we treat AI systems but also how we build and align them. But the most unexpected reward of investigating AI consciousness turns out to be what it reveals about our consciousness, about the nature of the human self. Murray’s most interesting claim is that LLMs have an important buddhist lesson to teach all of us, namely, that there is no “us.” By better understanding the "no-self" of LLMs we are given a mirror to reflect on whether human selves are also an illusion. Timestamps: 08:26 Why Buddhist Enlightenment May be Easier for Software Programs 16:30 Super-Intelligent AI Might Not Want To Take Over the World 30:25 Wittgenstein’s Radical Take on Consciousness 42:55 What Video Games Teach Us About Consciousness 49:59 How the Movie Ex Machina Created a Better Test for AI Consciousness 1:02:36 What the Debate about AI Consciousness Is Missing 1:09:31 Does Conscious AI Have A Moral Right to Live? 1:15:01 Is the Human Brain Computationally Superior to AI? 1:26:59 Why Philosophy Is the Essential Skill for the AI Age

Johnathan Bi

30,521 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr