Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Can autoresearch agents find better training data, not just better training code? Here’s our new EMNLP paper: AutoData: Agentic Search for Pre-training Data Selection [1/6]

19,393 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Weco AI
Weco AI1 месяц назад

Having an agent read every document would be too expensive. AutoData instead writes code (heuristics) to select documents using features like length and perplexity. It trains a small model on the selected data, then uses validation feedback to improve the heuristics. [2/6]

Фото профиля Weco AI
Weco AI1 месяц назад

On an already highly curated dataset (ClimbMix), AutoData finds a recipe that further improves NanoChat scores, outperforming existing data-selection methods. The gains also carry over to larger models without re-tuning the recipe. [3/6]

Фото профиля Weco AI
Weco AI1 месяц назад

The two best recipes both keep a random sample of the corpus, then use quality signals to select the rest. One recipe makes the reward for low perplexity depend on n-gram diversity, so repetitive text gets less credit. [4/6]

Фото профиля Weco AI
Weco AI1 месяц назад

Paper has been up on arxiv and code are opensourced: Paper: GitHub: Blog: [5/6]

Фото профиля Weco AI
Weco AI1 месяц назад

Work led by @vivian_yanmy during her internship at Weco. We'd also like to thanks to @NVIDIA for the compute support! [6/6]

Фото профиля David Yin
David Yin1 месяц назад

better data selection feels more useful than another coding benchmark.

Фото профиля Lennox
Lennox1 месяц назад

This is a useful reframing: data selection is itself an agentic search problem. The strongest eval would measure not only validation gain, but search cost, diversity, and whether the agent can explain why each sample earned its place.

Фото профиля Siftloom
Siftloom1 месяц назад

moving autoresearch upstream to data selection is a bigger lever than tuning code. did the agent's picks transfer across model scales or is the gain tied to the size it was searched on?

Фото профиля Shorya Mishra
Shorya Mishra1 месяц назад

“this is a much harder search space than hyperparams imo. bad code usually fails visibly; bad data selection can train perfectly and only reveal itself later as a capability gap”

Фото профиля Mira Takes
Mira Takes1 месяц назад

Autoresearch that improves data selection could be as important as improving the optimizer itself. The evaluation challenge is proving transfer: a dataset chosen for one benchmark should improve real downstream tasks without overfitting to the curator's proxy or amplifying hidden bias in the source pool.

Фото профиля Hybrid 🏃🏾
Hybrid 🏃🏾1 месяц назад

🤔🤔

Похожие видео

Today, we're joined by Aakanksha Chowdhery, member of technical staff at Reflection, to explore the fundamental shifts required to build true agentic AI. While the industry has largely focused on post-training techniques to improve reasoning, Aakanksha draws on her experience leading pre-training efforts for Google’s PaLM and early Gemini models to argue that pre-training itself must be rethought to move beyond static benchmarks. We explore the limitations of next-token prediction for multi-step workflows and examine how attention mechanisms, loss objectives, and training data must evolve to support long-form reasoning and planning. Aakanksha shares insights on the difference between context retrieval and actual reasoning, the importance of "trajectory" training data, and why scaling remains essential for discovering emergent agentic capabilities like error recovery and dynamic tool learning. 🗒️ For the full list of resources for this episode, visit the show notes page: 📖 CHAPTERS =============================== 00:00 - Introduction 02:26 - Reflection 04:54 - Limitations of post-training for building agents 07:31 - Rethinking pre-training in agents 10:51 - Scaling 11:27 - Evolving attention mechanisms for agentic capabilities 12:39 - Memory as a tool 14:13 - Loss objectives and training data 15:50 - Fine-tuning loss in agent performance 19:37 - Training data 21:29 - Augmenting dominant training data source 24:11 - Overcoming challenges in training on synthetic data 25:47 - Benchmarks 30:44 - Scaling laws in large models versus small models 33:20 - Long-form versus short-form reasoning 37:57 - Agent’s ability to recover from failure 40:15 - Hallucinations and failure recovery 43:53 - Tool use in agents 46:38 - Coding agents 48:37 - How researchers can contribute to agentic AI

The TWIML AI Podcast

48,352 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад