Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Can multicultural societies work?
107,313 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 37

Your examples of succesful multicultural societies are all authoritarian regimes.

Immigrant here: globalist immigration policy is a corrupt regime. Sound immigration must be based on 3 principles 1. Assimilation by immigrants 2. Acceptance by members of society 3. Available economic opportunity NONE of these exist anywhere in the west

Feels very propagandish lately, I'm disappointed.

Which part?

Multiculturalism only works with dictatorial rule. Democracy and multiculturalism leads to civil war.

Love your work but on this one you’re wrong. Aristotle wrote that a multicultural DEMOCRACY couldn’t work because there would be no sense of PHILIA connecting the people and a despot would play the groups off each other to centralize power. Your example of having talented immigrants doesn’t mean multiculturalism as it would be assumed they would assimilate to the country’s culture in key points (maybe not food). France is exactly what Aristotle predicted multiculturalism in a democracy would look like.

They were not intended to work. The "theory" was reverse engineered from Trudeau's 1971 experiment to address the Quebec seperatist movement.

well said. good job Lina😉

Thank you for your support 😊

France is not a good example. Rioting is a way of Life here

Very smart. Why is this so hard to understand? You can’t let something new come in and just change the things each individual and smaller group held sacred. Let each exist and do the greater thing the way that matters to their conscience. Let the greater identity merely inspire the good in each without conflicting with the send of good or wrong in the smaller. To do otherwise? “There would be no need for that.”

No. Look to history.

Not with Muslims

NO. Diversity is a weakness.

UAE and Qatar basically have a ruling native class and an immigration workforce, not a great example. Singapore works, because it’s mainly a south Asian mixed society. One has to compare oranges with oranges.

Don't make me tap the sign.

Imagine the Elite watching your video right now, thinking to themselves: Can multicultural societies destroy one another? This is what is actually happening in the real world Lina, it is what is relevant to society right now. Thanks for the philosophy lesson in morality, but I think your missing the far greater meaning.

Multiculture is a euphemism for multiracial. And it's what Jews foster. These societies are notoriously unstable, from Weimar to today's post Kalergi USA. Jews have pushed a multicultural agenda to destroy homogeneous societies. A united C.A. with low IQ blacks would be a mistake

Deutschland der 90ziger Jahre hätte sich bestimmt gut mit z.B. Dänen, Engländern, Schweden zurechtgefunden, weil ein relativ einheitliches Kultur und Unrechtsbewusstsein besteht. Kommt also auch sehr darauf an mit wem man eine multikulturelle Gesellschaft anstrebt.

Countries with the highest outflows of migrants have the lowest diversity rates and vice versa. The system has been gamed against western countries….this is before we even get into the welfare issue

Well Said. Indonesia with many religions and ethnicities still all living together peacefully. Same society was fractured a few decades ago. People having a common goal for prosperity unified them and moved the country from one of poorest to one of richest.

Yes, Multiculturalism can only work within the framework of a shared and celebrated nationlistic cultural identity. Not when mutliculturalism is the thing that is celebrated for the sake of diversity as a virtue.

“That wasn’t real communism”

Diversity is never a strength. A country can be successful despite its diversity but not because of it. Islam, will never work in a non-Muslim country because it is written within the laws of Islam to dominate the world. Enough Muslims rioting can overwhelm any local police.

Absolutely Brilliant

The world did have more peace and order and high trust societies with more homogeneous societies. That is a fact

NO they cannot

There are two simple rules that produce best societies: -- be tough on crime -- don't give away stuff for free

Exactly! In an existing society imigrants just should be the spice. If too much spice, the meal goes rubish

Any pluralistic society will rely on force to maintain order. Examples in the last few decades: Syria, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Russia, Lebanon, China. The alternative is societal collapse, like now in France and Britain.

As someone who lived and is currently living in a multicultural society, I do agree its possible. The issue is that multiculturalism often comes with vastly different values, so we should be advocating for a diversity of backgrounds, not diversity of values.

Technically,those are not multicultural societies. There is a single dominant culture;others are barely tolerated, and those belonging to a culture different from the dominant one are treated as 2nd-class citizens. Plus,these are countries where immigration is strictly screened.

It’s a bi-cultural society. It’s Western society, and Islamic society.

The root of of evil is corruptions of ruling politicians! They deliberately take money for themselfs from Katar, Soros funds and allowed illigal activities like mass influxes of illigal immigrants in Europe and UK... In that behavior they show total contempt to theirs own voters and people in theirs countries and don't care about rising criminals rates like raping, theft ECT made by thougs immigrants!

Whats your motivation for wanting multicultural societies?

It is not about multiculturalism. You got to understand that karma is a bitch. Europe along with US destroyed civilisations around the world mostly in African and middle east. This has created refugees and wrecked societies. The victims have to come to europe.

Every multicultural society you mentioned has similar ethnic components and isn’t full of Africans and Muslims. Why should we WANT a multicultural society? What we are getting is societal and ethnic eradication, hence why we (native) are denied an ethnic identity.
