Can you prove something?

You cannot prove the big bang theory. Yet they believe it

Cliff with the silly arguments again.

Wait, asking for 100% proof of near anything that happened in the past as a way to say it didn’t happened is a flawed argument. 🤨

If you want to play the academic using presuppositional apologetics? You're going to have to keep posting videos of arguing with students. Don't try that crap on capable educated people.

That which can be presented without proof can be dismissed without proof. Everyone trying to discount her question is failing the rules of debate, the primary being the proof of something lies with the claimant. The man's religion claims Jesus rose from the dead. So, she's asking for proof of that claim. He must defend that claim or be proven wrong.

Well spoken. They demand 100% proof for that topic only because they wish to dismiss it.

Even when Christ walked and performed miracles people still denied him; proof is not what keeps people from God but their pride. Trust, or faith, in the Lord is difficult when so little of it is practiced between peoples.

Another delusional argument by an idiot religious person.

I assume the milk I put in my fridge will still be there when I want it next. We live mostly on assumptions.

The ressurection story is fake and we know when it was added to the Bible. It's not even in the original text nor is it in the dead sea scrolls. It's fake. Learn your religion people.

Give me a 100% proof your great grandfather existed.

Master question dodger

She lies once, she'll keep lying to make a point out of lies 🤔 Brain hurts now

Good luck America

He’s just beating about the bush. You can’t be 100% certain about something in the future. It’s not about being certain about the medicine the pharmacist gives you; it’s about trust. There’s a difference between trusting and being certain. He’s deliberately twisting the concepts.

Oh she tore him up

Thomas Huxley's agnostic method: - Keep what you claim to know or believe to be real or true, right or wrong, to what you can articulate on logical scientific grounds. - In all humility and honesty we need to be willing to admit ignorance when our claims can not meet that basic standard. Huxley dismissed both atheists and theists as too sure, when it came to Jesus, theists were unjustifiable too certain.

That guy got smoked

They have yet to prove the theory of evolution 🤣

Give us 100% proof evolution is true

The only think we know is that we know nothing…

The lady's question is poorly made but if the requirement isn't so high i think what she meant is that there has to be some kind of verifiable proof at least. Doesn't need to be 100% as science itself is not an instrument to get absolute truth and never claimed to be able to

Absolute certainty is overrated, life gets boring when you don't have to believe.

This is why it's called "faith" which is believing something without proof.

La Biblia no es una novela ni un libro de historia.

2026 and no proof 🦘

Hmm… this is interesting.

Old geezer lmao

If Jesus did not rise from the dead, where is the body? Why didn't the Pharisees bring it out and show everyone the disciples were lying? Nobody could have stolen the body. A massive stone sealed the tomb and two soldiers who would die before failing their duty were guarding it.

Fundamentally you cannot prove anything since you must have faith in your senses like your eyes. You cannot prove that you're schizophrenic, Because you are forced to use something that you are trying to prove. making the arguments for "proof" circular.

She’s right, you can’t 100% prove something will happen, but you can (for all intents and purposes) prove something that already happened 100%

He didnt engage with her argument about past vs future lol he a fraud.

I knew this in the 6th grade. I find it hard to believe people are this stupid. This has to be fake. It's always a woman saying this crap. This is basic empiricism in philosophy.