Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Canada just spent half a billion dollars poaching 64 academics, three-quarters of them from the U.S., and then CTV put the most revealing quote on TV Talia Bettcher (trans philosophy / gender studies) is leaving Cal State LA for a taxpayer-funded chair at Waterloo because, in her words, it...

cbcwatcher's profile picture

cbcwatcher

44,380 subscribers

822,988 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Tucker goes through the reasons why the U.S. is embarking on a possible regime change war in Venezuela… Is it because they are “communist?” Not really. Gay marriage, trans survives etc are illegal in Venezuela. Further if we really stood for “democracy” we would free the British people from their tyranny. Is it because of Oil? No. The U.S. had plenty of oil. Is it because of drugs? No. That’s slop for the masses. Most drugs in the U.S. come from Mexico and other places… plus if you really want to stop drugs in the U.S., you would cut off the NGO’s and deport the actual drug dealers, not antisemites…. So why is it? Well Tucker can’t put it as bluntly as me but the real reason is because Maduro and Venezuela have been critical of Jewish power. Since the U.S. is the puppet state of that Jewish power, it is being used to crush him.
2:55

Tucker goes through the reasons why the U.S. is embarking on a possible regime change war in Venezuela… Is it because they are “communist?” Not really. Gay marriage, trans survives etc are illegal in Venezuela. Further if we really stood for “democracy” we would free the British people from their tyranny. Is it because of Oil? No. The U.S. had plenty of oil. Is it because of drugs? No. That’s slop for the masses. Most drugs in the U.S. come from Mexico and other places… plus if you really want to stop drugs in the U.S., you would cut off the NGO’s and deport the actual drug dealers, not antisemites…. So why is it? Well Tucker can’t put it as bluntly as me but the real reason is because Maduro and Venezuela have been critical of Jewish power. Since the U.S. is the puppet state of that Jewish power, it is being used to crush him.

Uncommon Sense

52,740 views • 10 months ago

Adam Chambers "I am very concerned that the Prime Minister is putting the country in an unsafe or unstable fiscal position, especially given the uncertainty that we see in the world." "And these aren't just my words or Conservative words. These are the words of even Fitch, the rating agency, who said that the government's fiscal position is being eroded and that it can't be confident that the projections will continue the way they are because they have a history of having higher deficits and higher spending than, than what they promised." "So I think that's a primary concern for Conservatives, absolutely, is the level of debt that leaving for our next generation." Adam Chambers
2:52

Adam Chambers "I am very concerned that the Prime Minister is putting the country in an unsafe or unstable fiscal position, especially given the uncertainty that we see in the world." "And these aren't just my words or Conservative words. These are the words of even Fitch, the rating agency, who said that the government's fiscal position is being eroded and that it can't be confident that the projections will continue the way they are because they have a history of having higher deficits and higher spending than, than what they promised." "So I think that's a primary concern for Conservatives, absolutely, is the level of debt that leaving for our next generation." Adam Chambers

cbcwatcher

45,908 views • 9 months ago

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.
1:27

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,496 views • 3 months ago

🚨ICE agents were filmed assaulting a group of U.S. citizens for no reason, in California. In the video, ICE agents walked up to a group of U.S. citizens while they were filming, on public property, and then started shoving them. Then, they escalated even further, pointing pepper spray at multiple people who were doing nothing but recording, before casually walking back to their cars and leaving. No additional arrests, no threat identified, no justification given… just force. So, let’s call this what it is… A violation of the First Amendment. You have a protected right to film law enforcement in public… These people weren’t interfering with anything… ICE agents approached them and retaliated against them for exercising that right. That’s unconstitutional. And then there’s the Fourth Amendment… Law enforcement cannot use force without justification. They cannot walk up to civilians, put hands on them, and escalate to threats of chemical force because they feel like it. Shoving people who pose no threat and pointing pepper spray at people who are standing is excessive force… and it’s an unlawful seizure, even if it only lasts seconds. And the pattern here is what everyone should pay attention to. They finish an arrest…then turn to the bystanders. They don’t de-escalate, they expand the confrontation. They don’t leave, they intimidate. Because if federal agents can walk up to you on a sidewalk and assault you for exercising your first amendment rights… then your rights don’t exist.
1:55

🚨ICE agents were filmed assaulting a group of U.S. citizens for no reason, in California. In the video, ICE agents walked up to a group of U.S. citizens while they were filming, on public property, and then started shoving them. Then, they escalated even further, pointing pepper spray at multiple people who were doing nothing but recording, before casually walking back to their cars and leaving. No additional arrests, no threat identified, no justification given… just force. So, let’s call this what it is… A violation of the First Amendment. You have a protected right to film law enforcement in public… These people weren’t interfering with anything… ICE agents approached them and retaliated against them for exercising that right. That’s unconstitutional. And then there’s the Fourth Amendment… Law enforcement cannot use force without justification. They cannot walk up to civilians, put hands on them, and escalate to threats of chemical force because they feel like it. Shoving people who pose no threat and pointing pepper spray at people who are standing is excessive force… and it’s an unlawful seizure, even if it only lasts seconds. And the pattern here is what everyone should pay attention to. They finish an arrest…then turn to the bystanders. They don’t de-escalate, they expand the confrontation. They don’t leave, they intimidate. Because if federal agents can walk up to you on a sidewalk and assault you for exercising your first amendment rights… then your rights don’t exist.

Jesus Freakin Congress

55,679 views • 4 months ago

Former acting U.S. Trade Representative and General Counsel (USTR) Stephen Vaughn "Well, I think it's very important to understand, to begin with, no one has given Canada a better trade deal than the US this year so far." "In the first six months of this year, the United States imported $200 billion worth American dollars worth of goods from Canada. We're your best market." "Well, I think it is important to understand that the Trump, the people who voted for Donald Trump, wanted a different deal than the one that they had. And that's what the President is trying to get." "But at the end of the day, this has been a great deal for Canada, and whatever comes out of this, I continue to think the U.S. will give Canada a better deal than she can get from any other country." "If you want to have a closed dairy market, if you want to have closed markets and keep the Americans out of those markets, then you're not going to get as much access to the US market. That's just basic trade negotiation 101." Vaughn is a partner at King & Spadina Law King & Spalding
3:57

Former acting U.S. Trade Representative and General Counsel (USTR) Stephen Vaughn "Well, I think it's very important to understand, to begin with, no one has given Canada a better trade deal than the US this year so far." "In the first six months of this year, the United States imported $200 billion worth American dollars worth of goods from Canada. We're your best market." "Well, I think it is important to understand that the Trump, the people who voted for Donald Trump, wanted a different deal than the one that they had. And that's what the President is trying to get." "But at the end of the day, this has been a great deal for Canada, and whatever comes out of this, I continue to think the U.S. will give Canada a better deal than she can get from any other country." "If you want to have a closed dairy market, if you want to have closed markets and keep the Americans out of those markets, then you're not going to get as much access to the US market. That's just basic trade negotiation 101." Vaughn is a partner at King & Spadina Law King & Spalding

cbcwatcher

19,093 views • 15 days ago

Kate Harrison "I think a lot of Canadians would be surprised by, again, the depth of murders and killings of Iranian people at the heads of the Iranian regime and that this is a response to the plea of the Iranian people for a change and for democracy in that country." "And I think that, and I'm not putting this at the feet of CBC, but the news media ecosystem, in my view, in Canada... did not share those stories in a way that I think is sufficient to help again rationalize what we're seeing now." Katie Simpson "And I think there has been some analysis that I have seen is that perhaps Canada and other allies might be more comfortable supporting the US Effort in this moment because of what happened in January, because of the mass murder of protesters in the streets at the hands of the Iranian regime." Harrison "So this is an opportunity for Canada to look inward and really assess whether or not we're doing all we can to look at energy security for diplomacy's sake and getting our own exports to market." Kate Harrison Katie Simpson
2:45

Kate Harrison "I think a lot of Canadians would be surprised by, again, the depth of murders and killings of Iranian people at the heads of the Iranian regime and that this is a response to the plea of the Iranian people for a change and for democracy in that country." "And I think that, and I'm not putting this at the feet of CBC, but the news media ecosystem, in my view, in Canada... did not share those stories in a way that I think is sufficient to help again rationalize what we're seeing now." Katie Simpson "And I think there has been some analysis that I have seen is that perhaps Canada and other allies might be more comfortable supporting the US Effort in this moment because of what happened in January, because of the mass murder of protesters in the streets at the hands of the Iranian regime." Harrison "So this is an opportunity for Canada to look inward and really assess whether or not we're doing all we can to look at energy security for diplomacy's sake and getting our own exports to market." Kate Harrison Katie Simpson

cbcwatcher

37,426 views • 6 months ago

David founder Peter Rahal on why there's not much innovation in food: "Food entrepreneurs are predominately luddites. A lot of talented entrepreneurs just don’t go into food. Because it’s hard. And it’s not obvious how to differentiate. Nutrition science is not seen as a real science. This leads to a lot confusion in the market. For example, the economics don’t work to study the effect of a potato on the human body. There’s just not enough money in potatoes to justify the R&D budget to learn more about them. And so there’s actually not a lot of money going into the research and science of nutrition. Peter Thiel has a quote “If you ever put science behind something, it’s not a real science.” And so nutrition science is not a real science. But it can be. There’s just no money in it. And what is food? It’s really just understanding biochemistry. But it just doesn’t exist. And I think it’s probably driven by the economics of it. So I think that’s the main reason. But hopefully it will change in the future." Full conversation with Peter here:
2:02

David founder Peter Rahal on why there's not much innovation in food: "Food entrepreneurs are predominately luddites. A lot of talented entrepreneurs just don’t go into food. Because it’s hard. And it’s not obvious how to differentiate. Nutrition science is not seen as a real science. This leads to a lot confusion in the market. For example, the economics don’t work to study the effect of a potato on the human body. There’s just not enough money in potatoes to justify the R&D budget to learn more about them. And so there’s actually not a lot of money going into the research and science of nutrition. Peter Thiel has a quote “If you ever put science behind something, it’s not a real science.” And so nutrition science is not a real science. But it can be. There’s just no money in it. And what is food? It’s really just understanding biochemistry. But it just doesn’t exist. And I think it’s probably driven by the economics of it. So I think that’s the main reason. But hopefully it will change in the future." Full conversation with Peter here:

The Peel

12,108 views • 1 month ago

Dr Anthony Fauci authorized over $200 million US taxpayer dollars for transgender animal testing and animal torture “Can you describe what exactly the American people's taxpayer dollars were spent on regarding transgender animal testing?” “Yeah: - In a lot of these cases, they involve mice, rats, monkeys who are being surgically mutilated and subjected to hormone therapies to mimic female to male or male to female gender transitions - Gender affirming hormone therapies, and then looking at the biological, psychological, and physiological effects of the gender transitions - Looking at the effects of taking vaccines after you've transitioned these animals from male to female or female to male - Looking at the size of their genitals changing after you've put them on estrogen or testosterone therapies to transition them - There was a $1.1 million grant to give female lab rats testosterone to mimic transgender male humans and then overdose them with this party drug to see if female animals taking testosterone were more likely to overdose on the sex party drug than animals who are not taking testosterone “Are many of these taxpayer funded animal studies shared with the public or is there a significant oversight of this research?” “You essentially needed a degree in information technology to navigate the federal spending databases to find any of this stuff.” “In our analysis, Dr. Fauci funded about 95% of the change-drender animal experiments” “What we are doing to test human effects is poisoning lab animals - Forcing them to breathe wildfire smoke simulated in a laboratory by burning different types of foliage and pumping into animals cages - Making them obese to simulate what it would be like for obese people to be exposed to wildfire smoke - Shooting off handguns and rifles and forcing animals to breathe the emissions and gun control experiments - and the list goes on and on”
3:14

Dr Anthony Fauci authorized over $200 million US taxpayer dollars for transgender animal testing and animal torture “Can you describe what exactly the American people's taxpayer dollars were spent on regarding transgender animal testing?” “Yeah: - In a lot of these cases, they involve mice, rats, monkeys who are being surgically mutilated and subjected to hormone therapies to mimic female to male or male to female gender transitions - Gender affirming hormone therapies, and then looking at the biological, psychological, and physiological effects of the gender transitions - Looking at the effects of taking vaccines after you've transitioned these animals from male to female or female to male - Looking at the size of their genitals changing after you've put them on estrogen or testosterone therapies to transition them - There was a $1.1 million grant to give female lab rats testosterone to mimic transgender male humans and then overdose them with this party drug to see if female animals taking testosterone were more likely to overdose on the sex party drug than animals who are not taking testosterone “Are many of these taxpayer funded animal studies shared with the public or is there a significant oversight of this research?” “You essentially needed a degree in information technology to navigate the federal spending databases to find any of this stuff.” “In our analysis, Dr. Fauci funded about 95% of the change-drender animal experiments” “What we are doing to test human effects is poisoning lab animals - Forcing them to breathe wildfire smoke simulated in a laboratory by burning different types of foliage and pumping into animals cages - Making them obese to simulate what it would be like for obese people to be exposed to wildfire smoke - Shooting off handguns and rifles and forcing animals to breathe the emissions and gun control experiments - and the list goes on and on”

Wall Street Apes

237,297 views • 1 year ago

Iris Murdoch on what philosophy actually is: Philosophy is notoriously difficult to define even for those who practise it. Speaking with Bryan Magee in 1977, Murdoch doesn't sidestep the question. She leans into it. "It's notoriously difficult to find philosophy… it's very difficult to say what it is." Her first move is to locate philosophy in the territory of structure and depth. It is "to do with conceptual structures," she says with "very deep structures of belief and knowledge," with meaning, with significance, with the question of how language relates to the world. But definition by content isn't enough. So she defines it by exclusion. Philosophy is not science. That much feels familiar. Yet Murdoch adds a subtler distinction: even when philosophy adopts a scientific style, "the actual what you're doing is certainly not science." The manner may borrow from the lab, but the activity is something else entirely. And philosophy is not art either. Her sharpest line is reserved for this boundary: "It's very important it's not sounds… as soon as you start doing sounds you're falling right out of philosophy." Sound aesthetic sensation, the seductive surface of language pulls the mind away from what philosophy actually is. The moment writing becomes music, it stops being thought. So if it is not science and not art, what is philosophy? Murdoch's answer is quiet but precise: "a kind of reflection on concepts." Not experiment. Not expression. Reflection. A sustained, disciplined turning of attention onto the structures we use to think — and asking whether they hold.
0:45

Iris Murdoch on what philosophy actually is: Philosophy is notoriously difficult to define even for those who practise it. Speaking with Bryan Magee in 1977, Murdoch doesn't sidestep the question. She leans into it. "It's notoriously difficult to find philosophy… it's very difficult to say what it is." Her first move is to locate philosophy in the territory of structure and depth. It is "to do with conceptual structures," she says with "very deep structures of belief and knowledge," with meaning, with significance, with the question of how language relates to the world. But definition by content isn't enough. So she defines it by exclusion. Philosophy is not science. That much feels familiar. Yet Murdoch adds a subtler distinction: even when philosophy adopts a scientific style, "the actual what you're doing is certainly not science." The manner may borrow from the lab, but the activity is something else entirely. And philosophy is not art either. Her sharpest line is reserved for this boundary: "It's very important it's not sounds… as soon as you start doing sounds you're falling right out of philosophy." Sound aesthetic sensation, the seductive surface of language pulls the mind away from what philosophy actually is. The moment writing becomes music, it stops being thought. So if it is not science and not art, what is philosophy? Murdoch's answer is quiet but precise: "a kind of reflection on concepts." Not experiment. Not expression. Reflection. A sustained, disciplined turning of attention onto the structures we use to think — and asking whether they hold.

Big Brain Philosophy

18,908 views • 4 months ago

California Assemblyman confirms illegals are receiving healthcare and not only are California taxpayers paying to it but the entire country is Gavin Newsom created a loophole to get 1:1 funding from the federal government on noncitizen healthcare “This past year, we spent $9.6 billion on illegal immigrant health care —The media has actually been lying to people saying that no federal dollars goes to illegal. That is fundamentally wrong.” “Then what most people don't realize are the games that they're playing because we expanded Medi-Cal access towards emergency departments. Emergency departments are actually backfilled and funded one for one dollars from the federal government. So if an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room at all, they are bringing in federal dollars that are being spent on them.” “So it is a lie when they say that there are, there is no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants. California is doing it. The media is lying to you.”
0:49

California Assemblyman confirms illegals are receiving healthcare and not only are California taxpayers paying to it but the entire country is Gavin Newsom created a loophole to get 1:1 funding from the federal government on noncitizen healthcare “This past year, we spent $9.6 billion on illegal immigrant health care —The media has actually been lying to people saying that no federal dollars goes to illegal. That is fundamentally wrong.” “Then what most people don't realize are the games that they're playing because we expanded Medi-Cal access towards emergency departments. Emergency departments are actually backfilled and funded one for one dollars from the federal government. So if an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room at all, they are bringing in federal dollars that are being spent on them.” “So it is a lie when they say that there are, there is no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants. California is doing it. The media is lying to you.”

Wall Street Apes

165,065 views • 8 months ago

A lot has been said about Nick Fuentes over his take on Epstein and the files. Here’s his actual take, in his own words, on what he thinks the real scandal is. “Are these emails with Bill Gates and Jeffery Epstein real? Because if they are, then that means Epstein had extraordinary blackmail leverage over Bill Gates, one of the richest people in the world.” “If Epstein had a similar relationship with Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, or Bill Clinton. You know, that’s a big problem. Because that would seem to suggest these people are compromised. By who? For what purpose?” “To the extent that there was pedophilia or underaged sexual abuse, not justifying it, that was only in the furtherance of another crime. You understand the difference?” “Jefferey Epstein was pimping girls out to blackmail his clients. You understand? The sex trafficking, the sexual abuse of underaged girls, these were crimes committed in the furtherance of extortion. To compromise powerful people. That is actually the larger question. Are you prepared to ask that question?” “I see people squealing and screaming pedophile protector…I understand that…let’s say we nail someone for sleeping with a 16 year old or a 15 year old. It’s a crime. It’s disturbing. But the next question is, who paid for the blackmail? Is that person compromised? And if they were compromised, what were they ordered to do and by who?” “That is the scandal here.” “The real thing is we need to get the FBI to investigate but they’ll never do that.” “This is hanging over Trump’s head like a dagger. So if Trump doesn’t bring us to war with Iran, the dagger falls. If Trump doesn’t play ball with the Israeli lobby or the billionaires, the dagger falls.” “No matter how you cut it, this is a catastrophe for Trump. And you wonder, what’s going on there?…what else is out there that we don’t know about?” “Really it’s a story about sex abuse in the service of political compromise, political blackmail.”
9:47

A lot has been said about Nick Fuentes over his take on Epstein and the files. Here’s his actual take, in his own words, on what he thinks the real scandal is. “Are these emails with Bill Gates and Jeffery Epstein real? Because if they are, then that means Epstein had extraordinary blackmail leverage over Bill Gates, one of the richest people in the world.” “If Epstein had a similar relationship with Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump, or Bill Clinton. You know, that’s a big problem. Because that would seem to suggest these people are compromised. By who? For what purpose?” “To the extent that there was pedophilia or underaged sexual abuse, not justifying it, that was only in the furtherance of another crime. You understand the difference?” “Jefferey Epstein was pimping girls out to blackmail his clients. You understand? The sex trafficking, the sexual abuse of underaged girls, these were crimes committed in the furtherance of extortion. To compromise powerful people. That is actually the larger question. Are you prepared to ask that question?” “I see people squealing and screaming pedophile protector…I understand that…let’s say we nail someone for sleeping with a 16 year old or a 15 year old. It’s a crime. It’s disturbing. But the next question is, who paid for the blackmail? Is that person compromised? And if they were compromised, what were they ordered to do and by who?” “That is the scandal here.” “The real thing is we need to get the FBI to investigate but they’ll never do that.” “This is hanging over Trump’s head like a dagger. So if Trump doesn’t bring us to war with Iran, the dagger falls. If Trump doesn’t play ball with the Israeli lobby or the billionaires, the dagger falls.” “No matter how you cut it, this is a catastrophe for Trump. And you wonder, what’s going on there?…what else is out there that we don’t know about?” “Really it’s a story about sex abuse in the service of political compromise, political blackmail.”

Fractured Light

388,286 views • 7 months ago

Ali Khamenei is dead and a lot of Americans are suddenly asking: What exactly is the plan for the day after? Because the people who whispered in Trump’s ear — Netanyahu and others — sold him a fantasy: kill the head of the system and Iran collapses like a domino line. But Iran is not Syria. Syria’s state structure was tragically over-personalized, so when the leadership was removed, everything collapsed fast. Iran, for all its flaws, is a nation-state with multiple pillars, broader political participation, elections, competing factions, and institutions that don’t vanish overnight just because one man is gone. And here’s what the war planners never understand: even many Iranians who dislike the Islamic revolutionary approach can still connect the dots and remember the pattern: everywhere the Americans and Israelis intervene, the country ends up worse. So they may not love the system, but they can still see this as a war on the nation, not just “the regime.” Then comes the obvious question: who is the alternative? Because if the answer is Reza Pahlavi, the U.S.-based “prince” who’s never run anything in his life, then you’re not offering Iranians a future. And that’s why this matters: the original U.S. idea wasn’t just decapitation. It was decapitation plus a triggered uprising, so the people “finish the job” for you. The plan — for now — failed.
6:03

Ali Khamenei is dead and a lot of Americans are suddenly asking: What exactly is the plan for the day after? Because the people who whispered in Trump’s ear — Netanyahu and others — sold him a fantasy: kill the head of the system and Iran collapses like a domino line. But Iran is not Syria. Syria’s state structure was tragically over-personalized, so when the leadership was removed, everything collapsed fast. Iran, for all its flaws, is a nation-state with multiple pillars, broader political participation, elections, competing factions, and institutions that don’t vanish overnight just because one man is gone. And here’s what the war planners never understand: even many Iranians who dislike the Islamic revolutionary approach can still connect the dots and remember the pattern: everywhere the Americans and Israelis intervene, the country ends up worse. So they may not love the system, but they can still see this as a war on the nation, not just “the regime.” Then comes the obvious question: who is the alternative? Because if the answer is Reza Pahlavi, the U.S.-based “prince” who’s never run anything in his life, then you’re not offering Iranians a future. And that’s why this matters: the original U.S. idea wasn’t just decapitation. It was decapitation plus a triggered uprising, so the people “finish the job” for you. The plan — for now — failed.

Kevork Almassian

24,718 views • 6 months ago

Gerard Deltell "Now parents are stealing or shoplifting food." "And the fact check on this is that the Canadian Council of retailers estimates that $9 billion worth food is being stolen from grocery stores." Melanie Joly "We are here for the long term. Our measure is for a period of five years. We will be able to support families through this time of rising grocery costs." "We have the Canada Child Benefit, for instance. We have the National School Food Program." "And good news, the government of Quebec and the federal government just signed an agreement for that." Joly's solution is to make poor and starving families more reliant on the Liberal government for handouts. That is not a "long term" solution Mélanie Joly Gérard Deltell
1:12

Gerard Deltell "Now parents are stealing or shoplifting food." "And the fact check on this is that the Canadian Council of retailers estimates that $9 billion worth food is being stolen from grocery stores." Melanie Joly "We are here for the long term. Our measure is for a period of five years. We will be able to support families through this time of rising grocery costs." "We have the Canada Child Benefit, for instance. We have the National School Food Program." "And good news, the government of Quebec and the federal government just signed an agreement for that." Joly's solution is to make poor and starving families more reliant on the Liberal government for handouts. That is not a "long term" solution Mélanie Joly Gérard Deltell

cbcwatcher

16,966 views • 6 months ago

Jayson Tatum postgame on how his MVP stock can get overlooked because of the team he’s on, but he doesn’t care and only wants to win more championships: #Celtics “Probably so. I’m on a really, really good team. There’s so many talented players that I’m probably not going to put up the same numbers as some of those other guys and that’s perfectly fine with me, especially what we did in June last year. That’s the main focus, not me winning MVP, but for us to play at a high level and compete for championships year in and year out. If I accomplish that along the way, that would be amazing, but the main goal is for everybody to feel involved and everybody to play a part and that’s doing something special.”
0:48

Jayson Tatum postgame on how his MVP stock can get overlooked because of the team he’s on, but he doesn’t care and only wants to win more championships: #Celtics “Probably so. I’m on a really, really good team. There’s so many talented players that I’m probably not going to put up the same numbers as some of those other guys and that’s perfectly fine with me, especially what we did in June last year. That’s the main focus, not me winning MVP, but for us to play at a high level and compete for championships year in and year out. If I accomplish that along the way, that would be amazing, but the main goal is for everybody to feel involved and everybody to play a part and that’s doing something special.”

The Celtics Files

63,125 views • 1 year ago

ABSOLUTELY MUST WATCH CLIP... Deputy US Trade Representative Rick Switzer on USMCA "They can have a weak economy that is underperforming and not doing well, and Carney can feel superior." "Or they can have an economy that participates with as a partner of the U.S. economy." "And Carney can do what a grownup should do, which is figure out." "...It's my job as a person who's supposed to protect Canadian jobs and Canadian citizens and the Canadian economy to not let my ego and my feelings dictate what's best for my own economy." Q "Do you think this will have implications for the USMCA?" Switzer "Yeah, of course it is..." "Look, was Ambassador Greer in Canada? Did he meet with Carney? No." "...The grownups are in the room talking because there's a grown up in the presidency in leadership there, and I would argue there's not a grown up in Canada in charge there." "You don't go out of your way to antagonize the leader of the country that you are absolutely existentially tied to." "It's just political malpractice." Mark Carney
2:46

ABSOLUTELY MUST WATCH CLIP... Deputy US Trade Representative Rick Switzer on USMCA "They can have a weak economy that is underperforming and not doing well, and Carney can feel superior." "Or they can have an economy that participates with as a partner of the U.S. economy." "And Carney can do what a grownup should do, which is figure out." "...It's my job as a person who's supposed to protect Canadian jobs and Canadian citizens and the Canadian economy to not let my ego and my feelings dictate what's best for my own economy." Q "Do you think this will have implications for the USMCA?" Switzer "Yeah, of course it is..." "Look, was Ambassador Greer in Canada? Did he meet with Carney? No." "...The grownups are in the room talking because there's a grown up in the presidency in leadership there, and I would argue there's not a grown up in Canada in charge there." "You don't go out of your way to antagonize the leader of the country that you are absolutely existentially tied to." "It's just political malpractice." Mark Carney

cbcwatcher

326,509 views • 4 months ago

Russia’s deranged Zakharova urges the “responsible governments”, “those who try to become civilised’, to change sides, to switch to the “light and goodness”, as many did during WWII, because “those who did not were brought to tribunals”. “The window of opportunity is still open.” she said. “Once again, we call on the responsible governments and international organisations not to stand by, but to condemn these heinous acts of terrorism [the so-called terrorist attack on Belgorod and IL-76 attack]. Let me be frank and realistic about this situation. This is a window of opportunity for those who consider themselves civilised or try to become civilised. It is closing. It may sound cynical, but it is the truth. As you may be aware, many were initially supportive of the Third Reich during WWII. Not everyone immediately joined the ranks of anti-fascists. Even when they did, everyone had their rationale: some developed a conscience; others suddenly realised what was really happening; still others saw that the Soviet Union was winning the war. Those who switched to the side of “light and goodness” before the end of WWII got the status of respected states and communities for decades. Those who did not were brought to tribunals and were literally put in the pillory for decades. The window of opportunity is still open. Individuals, public figures, and organisations around the world are starting to ask themselves, “Who and what is keeping us on the side of evil and darkness?” The answer is clear. Many are harassed and blackmailed into staying on the dark side of history. The understanding of what is happening is rolling across the world.” she said.
2:16

Russia’s deranged Zakharova urges the “responsible governments”, “those who try to become civilised’, to change sides, to switch to the “light and goodness”, as many did during WWII, because “those who did not were brought to tribunals”. “The window of opportunity is still open.” she said. “Once again, we call on the responsible governments and international organisations not to stand by, but to condemn these heinous acts of terrorism [the so-called terrorist attack on Belgorod and IL-76 attack]. Let me be frank and realistic about this situation. This is a window of opportunity for those who consider themselves civilised or try to become civilised. It is closing. It may sound cynical, but it is the truth. As you may be aware, many were initially supportive of the Third Reich during WWII. Not everyone immediately joined the ranks of anti-fascists. Even when they did, everyone had their rationale: some developed a conscience; others suddenly realised what was really happening; still others saw that the Soviet Union was winning the war. Those who switched to the side of “light and goodness” before the end of WWII got the status of respected states and communities for decades. Those who did not were brought to tribunals and were literally put in the pillory for decades. The window of opportunity is still open. Individuals, public figures, and organisations around the world are starting to ask themselves, “Who and what is keeping us on the side of evil and darkness?” The answer is clear. Many are harassed and blackmailed into staying on the dark side of history. The understanding of what is happening is rolling across the world.” she said.

Yasmina

47,659 views • 2 years ago

Sherry Benson-Podolchuk is a retired RCMP officer of 20 years "I think in our laws and our police, they have to have better tools. That means we have to change the laws when it comes to mental health and firearms." "That means if you go to a house for a mental health check and there's firearms, give them the tools to seize those weapons and let the person and the home, however old they might be, that if someone is being investigated under the mental health act, those weapons are not returned until everybody is cleared in the home." "I mean, you just, we just never know who, who is going to snap." "...I think in order to return the weapons there needs to be some sort of mandated therapy where the people in the home, the person who was being, they were doing the mental health check and everybody in the home goes for or some sort of counseling to understand why what happened here and give the person the support that they need instead of just having an application and returning the weapons." "And so that's what I mean about these rules have to be, the laws have to be changed with regards to mental health and the link between firearms and potential violence." At the end CBC knows how little they can be bothered to educate themselves about firearms in Canada Brodie Fenlon
5:10

Sherry Benson-Podolchuk is a retired RCMP officer of 20 years "I think in our laws and our police, they have to have better tools. That means we have to change the laws when it comes to mental health and firearms." "That means if you go to a house for a mental health check and there's firearms, give them the tools to seize those weapons and let the person and the home, however old they might be, that if someone is being investigated under the mental health act, those weapons are not returned until everybody is cleared in the home." "I mean, you just, we just never know who, who is going to snap." "...I think in order to return the weapons there needs to be some sort of mandated therapy where the people in the home, the person who was being, they were doing the mental health check and everybody in the home goes for or some sort of counseling to understand why what happened here and give the person the support that they need instead of just having an application and returning the weapons." "And so that's what I mean about these rules have to be, the laws have to be changed with regards to mental health and the link between firearms and potential violence." At the end CBC knows how little they can be bothered to educate themselves about firearms in Canada Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

17,736 views • 6 months ago