Candace Doesn't Even Know The Basic Facts. Or... she's lying. You choose. In her debate with Andrew Wilson she got every critical fact wrong. This is all she's covered for 11 months and she can't be bothered to get the basic facts right?

@paleochristcon Gary , were you injured during your service in the military? Head injury perhaps? You keep getting it wrong and have lost respect and subscribers.

@paleochristcon Are you retarded? You sound retarded.

@paleochristcon Would you please just shut up!? Your paid obsession with Candace is psychotic!

@paleochristcon No. Would you please stay out of my comments?

@paleochristcon Look at this little guy. Stop it dude. Look how many views you are getting these days to a year ago. This neocon subverters (you, talmud tatum, crowder, shapiro, etc) taking the shekels and suppressing your morals. Christ is King!

@paleochristcon A lot more than you. You “Christ is King” people are nothing but brain rot Jew haters. 😂

@JoshHigdon1 @paleochristcon Didn’t Charlie Kirk often say, “Christ is King”? @grok

@paramounttactcl @JoshHigdon1 @paleochristcon Yes. Charlie Kirk said “Christ is King” in his own X posts, titled multiple videos that way, stated it in debates and speeches, and shared clips of crowds chanting it at his events.

@paleochristcon actually, your buddy Andrew didn’t even know any of the charges. You’re lying to protect a chauvinistic person who said “all women are retarded”. What does that show about you, your morality &respect towards women?

@paleochristcon Who cares? What a weak and pathetic argument. You must be a bot.

@paleochristcon

@paleochristcon Retard brain rot.

@paleochristcon Meanwhile, back in reality:

@paleochristcon You suck.

@paleochristcon Cope harder. I know facts hurt your feelings.

@paleochristcon 11 months and Andy couldn't name a single charge. Case closed.

@paleochristcon FYI - this is not Tyler Robinson

@paleochristcon So many bot in your comments 😂 cHrIsT iZ kAnG

@paleochristcon Like moths to a flame.

@paleochristcon She’s a liar. The tell.

@paleochristcon As usual you are wrong yet again Gary. As Candace said we can explain it to you but can’t understand it for you. The way and under who the evidence was brought in under makes it hearsay. And she explained which ones were not hearsay if you listened. Also the FBI is holding back

@paleochristcon How many times was Candace's "evidence" some secret unnamed source?

@paleochristcon All the times. Anonymous sources providing unverifiable information. Every. Single. Time.

@paleochristcon Andrew was way too polite with her. He should have just said "I think you're making that up"

@paleochristcon Gary come on you know she swept the floor with him ! When are you gonna get it?

@paleochristcon Right!!! Andrew Wilson claims from lalaland

@paleochristcon Your friends are destroying your brand Gary.

💯 The Defense tried to preclude the State from using "hearsay" to establish probable cause. Judge denied it June 12, 2026. The preliminary hearing is not a trial and does not determine guilt, so reliable hearsay is admissible. This is a moot point - noting to debate

@paleochristcon Andrew doesn't even know the charges which means he doesn't know why he's there. Moronic

@paleochristcon Gary stop being an idiot who says she does not have evidence and you calling her a terrorist is absolutely shocking you and your little group complain about Candace all the time with no proof of anything, and your a grown man (well supposedly) your a 🤡

Texts/discord messages - Line of custody and meta data not available (at least to the public) so yes a lot of this is still hearsay. DNA -Tyler’s is the most degraded Weirdly you didn’t mention this so I will Projectile fragments - cannot be confirmed came from THE GUN You cannot back your claim.

@paleochristcon What is your obsession with the word retard ? I taught my children and my grandchildren many years ago when they were younger that was not a nice word. Be the gentleman you USED to be

@paleochristcon

@paleochristcon Dang man, find somethin to do! U'v spend all this time trash talk'n people because they dont believe in the fed slop. U are all tear'n down Charlie's legacy & it's disgusting! WE R Charlie now & we WILL GO MAX!! 💪🏼 #justice4Charlie Best get right... Hell awaits not so tactical

@PoliCrusader @paleochristcon Only wine moms and beta men who hate Andrew tho k she won. It’s funny and sad watching the delusion

@paleochristcon She explained it to you it’s your job to understand but you can’t or won’t.. I think both. Go back to your cave man boy

@paleochristcon Are you high?!!! You get dumber by the day, selfie boy!!!

@paleochristcon

@paleochristcon Listen up and listen good. “The thing about smart mother fuckers is that sometimes, they sound like crazy mother fuckers to stupid mother fuckers...” You get it?

@paleochristcon Explain this…. Then I’ll take you serious you fkn mockingbird.

@paleochristcon Your bumbuddy Andrew couldn't even name a single charge!! He doesn't know the difference between the charging statement and what was presented at the hearing. Stop bending over for these fools for one minute and try to actually think critically!

@paleochristcon Bro, shut up you’re literally paid to talk. Shit you pathetic, weak man attacking a pregnant woman class act

Under Utah Rule of Evidence 1102 - Reliable hearsay is generally admissable at criminal prehearings in order to establish probable cause and bind a defendant over for trial. Reliable hearsay includes: Scientific, laboratory, forensic, medical, and autopsy reports. Statements from one peace officer to another testifying peace officer. Written or recorded statements given under oath or penalty of perjury. Other evidence carrying similar traditional indicia of reliability. WHICH WAS THE ENTIRE PREHEARING IF YOU WATCHED THE ENTIRE THING. How does something move from hearsay to evidence? That is something maybe you should learn. For example, the TEXT MESSAGES: This is what will need to be established by the prosecutors in trial: A. The physical phone belongs to Robinson. B. The phone was recovered from Robinson or otherwise shown to have been under his control. C. The relevant messaging account belongs to Robinson. D. The account was logged into on that device during the relevant period. E. The messages originated from that device/account during that period. F. Robinson was in possession of the device at those times. G. There is no evidence of another person or remote session operating the account at the relevant times. H. The recipient—Lance—confirms that this was the conversation he had with Robinson. I. The messages contain contextual details independently associated with Robinson—the rifle, location, events that day, prior conversations, family relationships, etc. WHAT HAVE THEY PROVED OF THIS??? I could do this for each thing you listed and explain exactly what the prosecution must establish for each item you list in order to have it accepted as evidence. Now a continuance happens if the proffered heresay is found insufficient to support a bindover and additional direct evidence is necessary, if the court grants it. For instance, the court could say this in regards to the text messages, in which case, they will then have to follow those steps to confirm authenticity of the text messages. NONE OF THAT WAS DONE. LEARN THE LAW RETARD

@paleochristcon Paramount Not so tactical is paid by another country!!!

@paleochristcon