Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Candace has an established pattern of withholding information, evidence, and omitting facts to preserve the narratives that make her money. She held onto video footage from behind Charlie for months. On Dec. 15, Erika gave her information proving Brian Harpole wasn’t at Ft. Huachuca. She didn’t mention it until...

167,551 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Baron Coleman’s FOIA request for information about the SAM flight at Fort Huachuca was DENIED and labeled CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) from THE WHITE HOUSE. Donald Trumps team doesn’t want us to know about this flight. The same Donald Trump. That called Erika Kirk after Charlie was assassinated and asked her “what do you know” and Erika told him “I know everything”. I also think (allegedly in my opinion) when Erika was seen by Mitch Snow in the lobby of The Candlewood Suites, it’s because she was coming down from her room. I think she stayed the night at Fort Huachuca and attended the “bomb” meeting with Brian Harpole. I think that’s why she gave her excuse for the morning of the 9th instead of the 8th, like was claimed. An excuse that was proven a lie, they were not her kids, as presented by Paramount not so Tactical who also is working with Mitch Snows exes as punishment for him going on Candace’s show. I think that’s why Charlie looked like he was crying before in interview on Sept 9th, because Erika didn’t come home until midnight the morning of Sept 10th, and her and Charlie got in a fight which is what really woke up her daughter. In my opinion and of course allegedly. I bet we could learn exactly what happened to Charlie Kirk by this flight information and its mission, and evidence of Erika Kirk in the lobby of the Candle Wood Suites Hotel. And guess what? The President of the United States won’t let us see it.

Honest Ash

155,498 views • 1 month ago

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Natalie Jean Beisner

81,992 views • 2 months ago