Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Candace Owens is now pushing the exploding microphone theory. The “evidence” that she’s using to back her theory is a YouTube video of people using explosives. In the video they mention that the explosive left similar damage to a shot from a .30-06. BUT WAIT ✋ For 9 months...

CinemaShogun's profile picture

Cinema Shogun

38,828 subscribers

12,972 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Candace Owens now says there’s more evidence that Charlie Kirk was killed with an exploding microphone than there is evidence that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. Of course she’s unable to produce any of that evidence. She can however show slow motion videos from the day Charlie was killed while pretending that other people haven’t already been playing this same game for months. Keep in mind that she already told her fans that she knows for a fact that Charlie was shot. And she totally dismissed the microphone theories until all of her own theories dried up.
0:20

Candace Owens now says there’s more evidence that Charlie Kirk was killed with an exploding microphone than there is evidence that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. Of course she’s unable to produce any of that evidence. She can however show slow motion videos from the day Charlie was killed while pretending that other people haven’t already been playing this same game for months. Keep in mind that she already told her fans that she knows for a fact that Charlie was shot. And she totally dismissed the microphone theories until all of her own theories dried up.

Cinema Shogun

30,709 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.
0:22

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

Cinema Shogun

19,276 просмотров • 18 дней назад

John Doyle responds to conspiracy theorists who fancy themselves ballistics experts and assert that it's IMPOSSIBLE for Charlie Kirk to have been shot with a .30-06. Looks like exploding microphone theory is finally meeting its end. These people are sick. John Doyle
5:14

John Doyle responds to conspiracy theorists who fancy themselves ballistics experts and assert that it's IMPOSSIBLE for Charlie Kirk to have been shot with a .30-06. Looks like exploding microphone theory is finally meeting its end. These people are sick. John Doyle

Blake Kresses

19,320 просмотров • 9 дней назад

UH OH 😱 Candace Owens fans are starting to notice that she’s just recycling old Charlie Kirk conspiracies from other YouTubers. Her excuse? She claims she didn’t know because she was in a state of shock and grief after Charlie was killed. The reality? When she’s running low on content her producers comb the internet and steal popular theories from other people often without giving credit. They’re always late to the game. In this case they’re 7 months late to the game but that’s because Candace thought the exploding microphone theory was too ridiculous for her show until the viewership started dropping.
0:42

UH OH 😱 Candace Owens fans are starting to notice that she’s just recycling old Charlie Kirk conspiracies from other YouTubers. Her excuse? She claims she didn’t know because she was in a state of shock and grief after Charlie was killed. The reality? When she’s running low on content her producers comb the internet and steal popular theories from other people often without giving credit. They’re always late to the game. In this case they’re 7 months late to the game but that’s because Candace thought the exploding microphone theory was too ridiculous for her show until the viewership started dropping.

Cinema Shogun

24,861 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Candace Owens fans would chug bleach if she told them to. For 6+ months she’s been hammering that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck. Now she’s flipping: nah, it wasn’t a neck shot … someone rigged his mic with a bomb and it blew up and killed him. 🧐 Her followers know this is nonsense, but instead of calling her out, they’re just nodding along to save face. Candace ran out of material, so she’s riding this exploding mic conspiracy for the next few weeks.
0:30

Candace Owens fans would chug bleach if she told them to. For 6+ months she’s been hammering that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck. Now she’s flipping: nah, it wasn’t a neck shot … someone rigged his mic with a bomb and it blew up and killed him. 🧐 Her followers know this is nonsense, but instead of calling her out, they’re just nodding along to save face. Candace ran out of material, so she’s riding this exploding mic conspiracy for the next few weeks.

Bren

12,495 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk
12:11

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk

Mrgunsngear

91,032 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

‼️Candace Owens Just PROVED There Is More EVIDENCE Supporting the Exploding Mic Theory Than the Official “Tyler Robinson LONE GUNMAN” Narrative😱 Candace Owens laid it out clearly tonight: when you actually look at the evidence, there is more supporting the theory that Charlie Kirk was killed by a rigged explosive device in his microphone than there is supporting the FBI’s claim that Tyler Robinson shot him from a rooftop. She walked through several key points: Bomb dogs were on scene but were never taken to where Charlie was sitting. The crime scene was paved over just days later (on a Sunday), which would destroy any trace chemical evidence from an explosive. A 30-06 bullet would have likely decapitated Charlie, not left him with a clean entry wound and no exit wound. Shards of hard plastic consistent with a shattered Rode wireless microphone were found inside the SUV that carried Charlie to the hospital. The SUV was quickly towed, cleaned, and resold — destroying what should have been a major piece of evidence. Terrell Farnsworth was specifically told to remove the SD card from the camera positioned directly behind Charlie. Meanwhile, the official story relies heavily on grainy footage and a narrative that keeps falling apart under scrutiny. Candace also noted that Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk have shown almost zero interest in actually investigating these inconsistencies. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has less evidence than the theory they’re trying to dismiss. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:
18:41

‼️Candace Owens Just PROVED There Is More EVIDENCE Supporting the Exploding Mic Theory Than the Official “Tyler Robinson LONE GUNMAN” Narrative😱 Candace Owens laid it out clearly tonight: when you actually look at the evidence, there is more supporting the theory that Charlie Kirk was killed by a rigged explosive device in his microphone than there is supporting the FBI’s claim that Tyler Robinson shot him from a rooftop. She walked through several key points: Bomb dogs were on scene but were never taken to where Charlie was sitting. The crime scene was paved over just days later (on a Sunday), which would destroy any trace chemical evidence from an explosive. A 30-06 bullet would have likely decapitated Charlie, not left him with a clean entry wound and no exit wound. Shards of hard plastic consistent with a shattered Rode wireless microphone were found inside the SUV that carried Charlie to the hospital. The SUV was quickly towed, cleaned, and resold — destroying what should have been a major piece of evidence. Terrell Farnsworth was specifically told to remove the SD card from the camera positioned directly behind Charlie. Meanwhile, the official story relies heavily on grainy footage and a narrative that keeps falling apart under scrutiny. Candace also noted that Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk have shown almost zero interest in actually investigating these inconsistencies. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story has less evidence than the theory they’re trying to dismiss. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

27,346 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens
6:43

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?
4:24

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?

Tamera Nealy

54,965 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Candace Owens says she was able to verify that Charlie Kirk was shot with a different caliber gun than is being claimed and there was no .30-06 bullet recovered on the death certificate.
6:30

Candace Owens says she was able to verify that Charlie Kirk was shot with a different caliber gun than is being claimed and there was no .30-06 bullet recovered on the death certificate.

ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

34,950 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Video from behind Charlie Kirk was released and shows NO signs of a .30-06 or any catastrophic damage of any kind from a bullet projectile at all. The best snipers in the world all stated themselves that the damage would have been extremely graphic and catastrophic from a .30-06 round. So what really happened? I leave this up to you to decide. What I will say is that there are a lot more questions than answers.
7:25

Video from behind Charlie Kirk was released and shows NO signs of a .30-06 or any catastrophic damage of any kind from a bullet projectile at all. The best snipers in the world all stated themselves that the damage would have been extremely graphic and catastrophic from a .30-06 round. So what really happened? I leave this up to you to decide. What I will say is that there are a lot more questions than answers.

The SCIF

95,108 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Candace Owens latest scramble for content shows just how desperate she has become lately‼️ She’s now resorting to stealing the exploding microphone theory from other people on the internet. She’s already told her fans for months that she knows Charlie was shot for a fact. She’s made it clear that she didn’t believe any of this stuff. But she has nothing left and she needs something to fill time on her show. I can already predict how this will go: 1. She’s going to lean into the exploding microphone theory. 2. We’re all going to make fun of how stupid it is. 3. She’s going to pretend like people making fun of her is really people panicking and then she’ll say she’s over the target and use that as an excuse to drag this out for a few weeks before dropping it like a hot potato. It’s all so predictable at this point. Also there was no FBI crash out on X they basically just said she’s full of 💩 and fake news that’s about it.
0:51

Candace Owens latest scramble for content shows just how desperate she has become lately‼️ She’s now resorting to stealing the exploding microphone theory from other people on the internet. She’s already told her fans for months that she knows Charlie was shot for a fact. She’s made it clear that she didn’t believe any of this stuff. But she has nothing left and she needs something to fill time on her show. I can already predict how this will go: 1. She’s going to lean into the exploding microphone theory. 2. We’re all going to make fun of how stupid it is. 3. She’s going to pretend like people making fun of her is really people panicking and then she’ll say she’s over the target and use that as an excuse to drag this out for a few weeks before dropping it like a hot potato. It’s all so predictable at this point. Also there was no FBI crash out on X they basically just said she’s full of 💩 and fake news that’s about it.

Cinema Shogun

24,368 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT
1:29

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

The SCIF

60,377 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Watch Candace Owens over the course of NINE MONTHS go from claiming Charlie Kirk was shot from BELOW, to then BEHIND, to then being 100% CERTAIN he was shot from the FRONT. NOW she's suggesting he may have actually been killed by an explosive microphone - which she dismissed back in Sept. Honestly, who knows what it'll be next month? There is no better IQ test than who takes Candace Owens seriously.
1:40

Watch Candace Owens over the course of NINE MONTHS go from claiming Charlie Kirk was shot from BELOW, to then BEHIND, to then being 100% CERTAIN he was shot from the FRONT. NOW she's suggesting he may have actually been killed by an explosive microphone - which she dismissed back in Sept. Honestly, who knows what it'll be next month? There is no better IQ test than who takes Candace Owens seriously.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

197,946 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

‼️Candace Owens Just BROKE Down the Exploding Mic Theory in Detail — And It’s Looking More CREDIBLE Than the Official FED-SLOP Story 🧐 Candace Owens spent a significant portion of tonight’s episode walking through the exploding microphone theory regarding Charlie Kirk’s assassination. She explained how Charlie began using two microphones (his usual handheld + a wireless Rode mic clipped to his shirt) during his Fall 2024 tour — something he hadn’t done before. The theory, originally put forward by X user John Bray, suggests that the small wireless Rode microphone was rigged with a shaped charge (likely PETN). Unlike a regular explosion that would go in all directions, a shaped charge is designed to direct the blast in one specific direction — functioning almost like a bullet. Candace noted that if this was the case, the explosion was likely intended to hit Charlie in the chest. The fact that it hit his neck instead may have been a miscalculation or malfunction. She pointed out that claiming a 30-06 bullet was stopped by Charlie’s “Superman neck” is far less believable than a directed explosive going slightly off target. This theory also lines up with the PETN connections she discussed yesterday involving the Butler assassination attempt and other suspicious events. While Candace has been careful not to definitively claim this is what happened, she made it clear that this theory is currently more plausible than the official narrative we’ve been given. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story keeps getting harder to believe. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:
9:04

‼️Candace Owens Just BROKE Down the Exploding Mic Theory in Detail — And It’s Looking More CREDIBLE Than the Official FED-SLOP Story 🧐 Candace Owens spent a significant portion of tonight’s episode walking through the exploding microphone theory regarding Charlie Kirk’s assassination. She explained how Charlie began using two microphones (his usual handheld + a wireless Rode mic clipped to his shirt) during his Fall 2024 tour — something he hadn’t done before. The theory, originally put forward by X user John Bray, suggests that the small wireless Rode microphone was rigged with a shaped charge (likely PETN). Unlike a regular explosion that would go in all directions, a shaped charge is designed to direct the blast in one specific direction — functioning almost like a bullet. Candace noted that if this was the case, the explosion was likely intended to hit Charlie in the chest. The fact that it hit his neck instead may have been a miscalculation or malfunction. She pointed out that claiming a 30-06 bullet was stopped by Charlie’s “Superman neck” is far less believable than a directed explosive going slightly off target. This theory also lines up with the PETN connections she discussed yesterday involving the Butler assassination attempt and other suspicious events. While Candace has been careful not to definitively claim this is what happened, she made it clear that this theory is currently more plausible than the official narrative we’ve been given. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The official story keeps getting harder to believe. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

90,816 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Candace Owens says the person seen on the rooftop isn’t Tyler Robinson. Her explanation? It was a decoy that crouched low and coordinated with hand 🖐️ 👉signals to time it perfectly with the shot so they could run and be caught on camera jumping off the building. BUT WAIT 🛑 She forgot for a second that she’s pretending to believe Charlie Kirk was killed with an exploding microphone so she has to correct herself from a shot to a boom. 🤦‍♂️ 😂 You know it would be one thing if Candace at least presented well thought out conspiracies that would at the very least make you go 🤔 hmmmm. But that’s not what Candace does. Candace literally presents some of the dumbest conspiracies I’ve ever heard. Stuff you would think a child came up with. Stuff that you would think is parody. Stuff so stupid it would be on a Naked Gun or Monty Python movie.
0:41

Candace Owens says the person seen on the rooftop isn’t Tyler Robinson. Her explanation? It was a decoy that crouched low and coordinated with hand 🖐️ 👉signals to time it perfectly with the shot so they could run and be caught on camera jumping off the building. BUT WAIT 🛑 She forgot for a second that she’s pretending to believe Charlie Kirk was killed with an exploding microphone so she has to correct herself from a shot to a boom. 🤦‍♂️ 😂 You know it would be one thing if Candace at least presented well thought out conspiracies that would at the very least make you go 🤔 hmmmm. But that’s not what Candace does. Candace literally presents some of the dumbest conspiracies I’ve ever heard. Stuff you would think a child came up with. Stuff that you would think is parody. Stuff so stupid it would be on a Naked Gun or Monty Python movie.

Cinema Shogun

51,235 просмотров • 4 дней назад

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens SHARES ALL HER VIDEO & PHOTO EVIDENCE OF CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION Candace Owens just dropped the ENTIRE video segment from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk when he was shot. The SD card from this camera was removed at the scene by Terryl Farnsworth. 🤨 She notes that remarkably THERE IS NO BLOOD VISIBLE on the back of Charlie, highlighting that the "30-06" round did not go through. She also released photos from inside the SUV with the plastic debris that took Charlie to the hospital that fateful day. This is ALL of it.
9:42

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens SHARES ALL HER VIDEO & PHOTO EVIDENCE OF CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION Candace Owens just dropped the ENTIRE video segment from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk when he was shot. The SD card from this camera was removed at the scene by Terryl Farnsworth. 🤨 She notes that remarkably THERE IS NO BLOOD VISIBLE on the back of Charlie, highlighting that the "30-06" round did not go through. She also released photos from inside the SUV with the plastic debris that took Charlie to the hospital that fateful day. This is ALL of it.

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

968,163 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting
5:13

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting

The SCIF

133,762 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Candace Owens just made an interesting discovery. AKA Candace Owens just ripped off someone else’s fake conspiracy she saw on social media. As usual her “explosive” discovery will be nothing more than a fizzled fart in the wind. However I am enjoying watching her cult suddenly pretend that they always believed in the exploding microphone theories. I’ve been interacting with these psychos for nearly a year now and whenever I made fun of the exploding microphone theories in the past they were always sure to tell me that neither they nor Candace believed in those theories. Now all of that has changed at the drop of a dime. The hive mind has been activated. And now the exploding microphone is “key” to cracking the case until they get bored with that in two weeks and find a new “key” that will crack the case.
0:28

Candace Owens just made an interesting discovery. AKA Candace Owens just ripped off someone else’s fake conspiracy she saw on social media. As usual her “explosive” discovery will be nothing more than a fizzled fart in the wind. However I am enjoying watching her cult suddenly pretend that they always believed in the exploding microphone theories. I’ve been interacting with these psychos for nearly a year now and whenever I made fun of the exploding microphone theories in the past they were always sure to tell me that neither they nor Candace believed in those theories. Now all of that has changed at the drop of a dime. The hive mind has been activated. And now the exploding microphone is “key” to cracking the case until they get bored with that in two weeks and find a new “key” that will crack the case.

Cinema Shogun

98,560 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

CANDACE: "I think there is a strong theory that should be explored that a shaped charge was used to kill him and that what killed him was on him." THE MOVE: In slow-motion video, Kirk's necklace appears to break before impact. Candace built an exploding mic theory from that.
2:51

CANDACE: "I think there is a strong theory that should be explored that a shaped charge was used to kill him and that what killed him was on him." THE MOVE: In slow-motion video, Kirk's necklace appears to break before impact. Candace built an exploding mic theory from that.

DataRepublican (small r)

38,745 просмотров • 8 дней назад