Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

😪 can’t never do no wrong in grey #phatass #bbw #fatass #ghettobooty #ebony #thickasf #bootyshorts #content #curvy #ebonypyt #jigglyass #hoodhoe

BIGDBEE❗

3,670 subscribers

95,621 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #phatass #bbw #fatass #ghettobooty #ebony #thickasf #bootyshorts #content #curvy #ebonypyt #jigglyass #hoodhoe

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

There are people crying in silence right now in rooms we’ll never see. They know something is wrong, but they can’t afford to do anything about it. We exist because we intend to reach the people in those rooms. But we can’t do it alone. Your donation, no matter how small buys someone another day, another chance to live. 0139722962 Sterling Bank Aproko Doctor Foundation Share this video if you can’t donate. Either way, you’re saving a life

There are people crying in silence right now in rooms we’ll never see. They know something is wrong, but they can’t afford to do anything about it. We exist because we intend to reach the people in those rooms. But we can’t do it alone. Your donation, no matter how small buys someone another day, another chance to live. 0139722962 Sterling Bank Aproko Doctor Foundation Share this video if you can’t donate. Either way, you’re saving a life

Aproko Doctor Global

14,689 次观看 • 4 个月前

Lavar Ball CRASHED OUT on basketball content creator ‘MK’ for having NO BRAND after he called Lavar delusional for saying his AAU league can compete with other leagues such as Nike’s EYBL 😳 “I like the delusion that he has, because to be successful, you need to be really delusional. To say you’re gonna compete against the EYBL with his AAU league is delusional, but I hear it.” “He gotta be delusional on the fact that he can’t do what I do because he doesn’t have a BRAND… That’s not a brand. Who’s gonna buy that??… Class is never in session with him because he’s too young to teach me anything… You say it’s delusional until you got it. Can’t be too delusional if you walked your a up in this house, in this big a gym. You ain’t got your own gym so you can’t tell me nothing. You have no ownership.”

Slime🐍

157,905 次观看 • 1 个月前

A man walked into their house and saw the company his brother keeps engaging in drug abuse. They were taking mkpụrụ mmiri. He had to confront them and warn them not to enter their house again. What exactly do these guys gain from these drugs? Highness, the ability to sleep, or the temporary escape of forgetting their problems? There is no gain. Some are simply victims of peer influence, while others engage in it because of environmental pressures. They know it’s wrong, yet they can’t resist it because they’re already addicted. At the end of the day, it could lead them to depression, stealing or committing other crimes. Please, say no to drugs. It’s never worth it. #SayNoToHardDrugs

A man walked into their house and saw the company his brother keeps engaging in drug abuse. They were taking mkpụrụ mmiri. He had to confront them and warn them not to enter their house again. What exactly do these guys gain from these drugs? Highness, the ability to sleep, or the temporary escape of forgetting their problems? There is no gain. Some are simply victims of peer influence, while others engage in it because of environmental pressures. They know it’s wrong, yet they can’t resist it because they’re already addicted. At the end of the day, it could lead them to depression, stealing or committing other crimes. Please, say no to drugs. It’s never worth it. #SayNoToHardDrugs

Kingsley Uchenna

164,452 次观看 • 6 天前

Like I said, you all don’t know shit. I have 100 over I can’t post the ones that have a lot of them, but she attacked me because she knows I won’t do anything back to her and she takes advantage of it. This is every day if I say one wrong thing if a girl enters my chat, etc.. you all have no idea what I’ve been living with and trying to make content at the same time. Do you think a woman like this is gonna let me collaborate. And now she’s facing seven felonies. Breaking entering destruction property theft above it’s over 60,000 in cash valuables and another 20 grand in destruction. That hasn’t been posted, but she doesn’t want me to post it, but she knows she’s red-handed caught about every lie she’s ever told. MAN, EVEN IF YOU’RE BEING ATTACKED, NEVER HIT A GIRL NO MATTER WHAT THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS BLOCK, RUN OR BAR HUB NO MATTER HOW PSYCHO THEY ARE 🐒👑🐍 -MKC #fishtanklive #crazy #attaxk #abuse #wild #violent

Like I said, you all don’t know shit. I have 100 over I can’t post the ones that have a lot of them, but she attacked me because she knows I won’t do anything back to her and she takes advantage of it. This is every day if I say one wrong thing if a girl enters my chat, etc.. you all have no idea what I’ve been living with and trying to make content at the same time. Do you think a woman like this is gonna let me collaborate. And now she’s facing seven felonies. Breaking entering destruction property theft above it’s over 60,000 in cash valuables and another 20 grand in destruction. That hasn’t been posted, but she doesn’t want me to post it, but she knows she’s red-handed caught about every lie she’s ever told. MAN, EVEN IF YOU’RE BEING ATTACKED, NEVER HIT A GIRL NO MATTER WHAT THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS BLOCK, RUN OR BAR HUB NO MATTER HOW PSYCHO THEY ARE 🐒👑🐍 -MKC #fishtanklive #crazy #attaxk #abuse #wild #violent

Alex B

10,591 次观看 • 2 个月前

Perry Saturn sat down with Chris Van Vliet and finally put the Moppy era in context. That whole “fell in love with a mop” thing wasn’t some random comedy idea. Saturn says it was punishment for the Mike Bell incident. “Pat Patterson thought I should marry a plunger, so that’s what he pitched, and somehow the plunger got turned into the mop. And the whole idea was I did that because I got hit in the head, which is what happened with Mike Bell, and this was my punishment. And I can prove it was a punishment because they never gave me any direction.” Vince wanted him to promise it would never happen again. Saturn wouldn’t lie. “Vince told me, ‘Okay, Perry, you have to tell me right now that you’re never going to do that again.’ I go, ‘Vince, I didn’t do it on purpose this time, so I can’t tell you that because I didn’t mean to do it.’” Paul Heyman had to sell it to him because they figured he’d quit. “I go, ‘Paul E, I’m not going to do that. I’m going to look like a f*cking idiot.’ He goes, ‘Perry, you have no choice.’” Saturn still owns it. He says he was wrong that night. No excuses. Perry Saturn #InsightWithCVV

Perry Saturn sat down with Chris Van Vliet and finally put the Moppy era in context. That whole “fell in love with a mop” thing wasn’t some random comedy idea. Saturn says it was punishment for the Mike Bell incident. “Pat Patterson thought I should marry a plunger, so that’s what he pitched, and somehow the plunger got turned into the mop. And the whole idea was I did that because I got hit in the head, which is what happened with Mike Bell, and this was my punishment. And I can prove it was a punishment because they never gave me any direction.” Vince wanted him to promise it would never happen again. Saturn wouldn’t lie. “Vince told me, ‘Okay, Perry, you have to tell me right now that you’re never going to do that again.’ I go, ‘Vince, I didn’t do it on purpose this time, so I can’t tell you that because I didn’t mean to do it.’” Paul Heyman had to sell it to him because they figured he’d quit. “I go, ‘Paul E, I’m not going to do that. I’m going to look like a f*cking idiot.’ He goes, ‘Perry, you have no choice.’” Saturn still owns it. He says he was wrong that night. No excuses. Perry Saturn #InsightWithCVV

Tito SanTanaChez

105,038 次观看 • 3 天前

What security concerns do you actually have, Harry? 🙄 You came to Nottingham in 2025 and there were no crowds waiting to see you. Your wife was booed at the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. After that, it was obvious she would never want to return to the UK. So what exactly is the security threat? You talk endlessly about your “freedom flight” & your happiness in California. So why are you still so desperate to hold on to UK security? If you’re truly free and content, why keep fighting to come back? The reality is, most people in the UK aren’t interested in seeing you anymore. You publicly trashed your family. Prince William has made it clear he wants nothing to do with you. So what are you really fighting for? No one has seen your children with the royal family, & unless you separate from Meghan, returning to the UK makes no sense. This constant whining about security feels less about safety & more about entitlement or boredom with your life in California.🤣 You can’t insult the UK, attack the Royal Family, & then expect to be welcomed back with taxpayer-funded protection. You walked away. Own it!

What security concerns do you actually have, Harry? 🙄 You came to Nottingham in 2025 and there were no crowds waiting to see you. Your wife was booed at the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. After that, it was obvious she would never want to return to the UK. So what exactly is the security threat? You talk endlessly about your “freedom flight” & your happiness in California. So why are you still so desperate to hold on to UK security? If you’re truly free and content, why keep fighting to come back? The reality is, most people in the UK aren’t interested in seeing you anymore. You publicly trashed your family. Prince William has made it clear he wants nothing to do with you. So what are you really fighting for? No one has seen your children with the royal family, & unless you separate from Meghan, returning to the UK makes no sense. This constant whining about security feels less about safety & more about entitlement or boredom with your life in California.🤣 You can’t insult the UK, attack the Royal Family, & then expect to be welcomed back with taxpayer-funded protection. You walked away. Own it!

Hanz

149,677 次观看 • 8 个月前

Is it all worth it? They spent a full year under financial strain, public pressure, sleepless nights, and mental exhaustion. All for one thing… standing up for themselves. The odds were almost zero. Challenging a multi-billion-dollar company run by those who only care about power and money? It was like a five-year-old telling their parents they were wrong. And yet, they did it. People called them naive. Reckless. Foolish. And honestly, it’s understandable. Society teaches that right is right and wrong is wrong. But it also teaches that going against what is “normal” is dangerous. “Don’t cause trouble. Stay quiet. Obey.” That’s what they always say. And when enough people follow the wrong thing, the wrong becomes the new “right.” Take lying as an example. As kids, we’re told lying is bad. But as we grow up, we learn that when everyone else lies, lying becomes necessary to survive. If you refuse, you get taken advantage of. So when something happens and everyone stays quiet, silence becomes the default. “Fighting won’t change anything.” “You’re just wasting your energy.” “You’ll never win against them anyway.” And that is why no one calls out a bully in class. That is why victims don't speak against wrongdoing. The moment someone does, they become the problem. It’s exactly like the dark forest theory: when one person hides, everyone else hides too. Anyone left standing in the open eventually becomes the target. So when people call them reckless, we can’t really blame them. What they really mean is: “I would never have the courage to do what they did.” Because that’s what most people do. They choose safety. They follow what society calls “normal.” They obey the unspoken “rules” they were taught. By standing up to power, the girls shattered that bubble of “normality.” They knew from the very beginning that they weren’t going to walk out of this with a glorious victory. That was never the point. They didn’t do this just to win. They did it because it was the right thing to do. So is it worth it? I guess you already know the answer. And I knew they did too. Because through it all, they proved something more important: Winning is a bonus. But if you don’t stand up for yourself, no one ever will. 🍀 #MhDHH_FRIENDS ©

Is it all worth it? They spent a full year under financial strain, public pressure, sleepless nights, and mental exhaustion. All for one thing… standing up for themselves. The odds were almost zero. Challenging a multi-billion-dollar company run by those who only care about power and money? It was like a five-year-old telling their parents they were wrong. And yet, they did it. People called them naive. Reckless. Foolish. And honestly, it’s understandable. Society teaches that right is right and wrong is wrong. But it also teaches that going against what is “normal” is dangerous. “Don’t cause trouble. Stay quiet. Obey.” That’s what they always say. And when enough people follow the wrong thing, the wrong becomes the new “right.” Take lying as an example. As kids, we’re told lying is bad. But as we grow up, we learn that when everyone else lies, lying becomes necessary to survive. If you refuse, you get taken advantage of. So when something happens and everyone stays quiet, silence becomes the default. “Fighting won’t change anything.” “You’re just wasting your energy.” “You’ll never win against them anyway.” And that is why no one calls out a bully in class. That is why victims don't speak against wrongdoing. The moment someone does, they become the problem. It’s exactly like the dark forest theory: when one person hides, everyone else hides too. Anyone left standing in the open eventually becomes the target. So when people call them reckless, we can’t really blame them. What they really mean is: “I would never have the courage to do what they did.” Because that’s what most people do. They choose safety. They follow what society calls “normal.” They obey the unspoken “rules” they were taught. By standing up to power, the girls shattered that bubble of “normality.” They knew from the very beginning that they weren’t going to walk out of this with a glorious victory. That was never the point. They didn’t do this just to win. They did it because it was the right thing to do. So is it worth it? I guess you already know the answer. And I knew they did too. Because through it all, they proved something more important: Winning is a bonus. But if you don’t stand up for yourself, no one ever will. 🍀 #MhDHH_FRIENDS ©

𝙡𝙤𝙗𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧🦞

72,808 次观看 • 9 个月前

Elon Musk is building orbital data centers. Sam Altman just called the idea ridiculous. One of them is thinking in decades. The other is thinking in quarters. Altman: “I honestly think the idea with the current landscape of putting data centers in space is ridiculous.” The math he’s running is real. Launch costs are brutal. Power economics favor earth. GPUs break and you can’t send a technician to orbit. Altman: “If you just do the very rough math of launch costs relative to the cost of power we can do on Earth, to say nothing of how you’re going to fix a broken GPU in space, and they do break a lot still unfortunately.” He’s not wrong about today. He might be wrong about what today’s constraints tell us about tomorrow. Altman: “We are not there yet. Orbital data centers are not something it’s going to matter at scale this decade.” This decade. That’s the qualifier doing all the work. Musk has never been in the business of optimizing for this decade. He’s in the business of building infrastructure everyone calls ridiculous until it becomes inevitable. They called reusable rockets ridiculous. Until Falcon 9 landed itself. And the entire economics of space changed overnight. Orbital compute has the same logic underneath it. No land constraints. No permits. No power grid politics. Unlimited solar energy. Positioned anywhere on earth within milliseconds. The launch costs that make it unviable today are the same launch costs Starship is designed to collapse by orders of magnitude. Altman is doing the math on the current landscape. Musk is building a different landscape entirely. When the person who made rockets reusable tells you space infrastructure is coming, that’s not a vision. That’s a roadmap.

Elon Musk is building orbital data centers. Sam Altman just called the idea ridiculous. One of them is thinking in decades. The other is thinking in quarters. Altman: “I honestly think the idea with the current landscape of putting data centers in space is ridiculous.” The math he’s running is real. Launch costs are brutal. Power economics favor earth. GPUs break and you can’t send a technician to orbit. Altman: “If you just do the very rough math of launch costs relative to the cost of power we can do on Earth, to say nothing of how you’re going to fix a broken GPU in space, and they do break a lot still unfortunately.” He’s not wrong about today. He might be wrong about what today’s constraints tell us about tomorrow. Altman: “We are not there yet. Orbital data centers are not something it’s going to matter at scale this decade.” This decade. That’s the qualifier doing all the work. Musk has never been in the business of optimizing for this decade. He’s in the business of building infrastructure everyone calls ridiculous until it becomes inevitable. They called reusable rockets ridiculous. Until Falcon 9 landed itself. And the entire economics of space changed overnight. Orbital compute has the same logic underneath it. No land constraints. No permits. No power grid politics. Unlimited solar energy. Positioned anywhere on earth within milliseconds. The launch costs that make it unviable today are the same launch costs Starship is designed to collapse by orders of magnitude. Altman is doing the math on the current landscape. Musk is building a different landscape entirely. When the person who made rockets reusable tells you space infrastructure is coming, that’s not a vision. That’s a roadmap.

Dustin

28,002 次观看 • 7 个月前

🎥 AKADEMIKS SPEAKS ON NBA YOUNGBOY x RAKAI STREAM THAT NEVER HAPPENED 👀 Akademiks revealed new details about a planned stream collaboration between NBA YoungBoy and Rakai that allegedly fell apart due to misinformation and behind the scenes decisions. 📌 WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN According to Akademiks: •NBA YoungBoy wanted to do a live stream with Rakai •The idea had been discussed months in advance •YoungBoy planned a surprise moment for Rakai during the stream •That surprise was allegedly a Lamborghini Urus Akademiks says YoungBoy was genuinely excited and tapped in with Rakai’s content. 🚨 WHAT WENT WRONG (ALLEGEDLY) •False stories began circulating online involving NBA YoungBoy and Kai Cenat’s ex •Tension reportedly formed due to misinformation •Akademiks claims Kai’s team had Rakai leave early •As a result: •The stream never happened •Rakai missed the surprise gift Akademiks suggests the decision was based on fear and misunderstanding, not reality. 🚗 THE LAMBORGHINI SURPRISE Akademiks claims: •YoungBoy felt bad seeing creators teased with fake gifts in the past •He wanted to do something real and impactful •The gift was allegedly an actual Lamborghini Urus •No toy, no prank a legitimate car surprise YoungBoy reportedly felt disappointed the moment never happened. 🧠 AKADEMIKS FRUSTRATION •Akademiks says the situation was blown out of proportion •Claims YoungBoy had no ill intent •Believes the opportunity was lost due to internet narratives •Says both fanbases can likely confirm parts of the story He also said he tried to communicate with Kai’s team but felt the situation spiraled unnecessarily. 📌 BOTTOM LINE •A major collab opportunity was allegedly missed •Internet rumors played a key role •NBA YoungBoy reportedly wanted to show love, not cause issues •Fans may never know what could’ve been a viral, positive moment

🎥 AKADEMIKS SPEAKS ON NBA YOUNGBOY x RAKAI STREAM THAT NEVER HAPPENED 👀 Akademiks revealed new details about a planned stream collaboration between NBA YoungBoy and Rakai that allegedly fell apart due to misinformation and behind the scenes decisions. 📌 WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN According to Akademiks: •NBA YoungBoy wanted to do a live stream with Rakai •The idea had been discussed months in advance •YoungBoy planned a surprise moment for Rakai during the stream •That surprise was allegedly a Lamborghini Urus Akademiks says YoungBoy was genuinely excited and tapped in with Rakai’s content. 🚨 WHAT WENT WRONG (ALLEGEDLY) •False stories began circulating online involving NBA YoungBoy and Kai Cenat’s ex •Tension reportedly formed due to misinformation •Akademiks claims Kai’s team had Rakai leave early •As a result: •The stream never happened •Rakai missed the surprise gift Akademiks suggests the decision was based on fear and misunderstanding, not reality. 🚗 THE LAMBORGHINI SURPRISE Akademiks claims: •YoungBoy felt bad seeing creators teased with fake gifts in the past •He wanted to do something real and impactful •The gift was allegedly an actual Lamborghini Urus •No toy, no prank a legitimate car surprise YoungBoy reportedly felt disappointed the moment never happened. 🧠 AKADEMIKS FRUSTRATION •Akademiks says the situation was blown out of proportion •Claims YoungBoy had no ill intent •Believes the opportunity was lost due to internet narratives •Says both fanbases can likely confirm parts of the story He also said he tried to communicate with Kai’s team but felt the situation spiraled unnecessarily. 📌 BOTTOM LINE •A major collab opportunity was allegedly missed •Internet rumors played a key role •NBA YoungBoy reportedly wanted to show love, not cause issues •Fans may never know what could’ve been a viral, positive moment

Cousin Tino ™️

17,839 次观看 • 7 个月前

Honestly gambit can do no wrong in my eyes because he’s been done so bold in this show. Got cucked all season 1 by the WORST ship in comic history ultimately rejected by the woman he loved, even when she ain’t deserve it, dies in the most heroic manner possible, then even in death, he can’t rest because apocalypse is using him as a pawn. Has to be the most tragic character in the show and I’ll always be his biggest apologist. Idk how I feel about this week’s episode because it seems like the pacing was all over the place, as has been a theme this season in general, but I do like being right. Called earlier that Rogue and Apocalypse conversation about love would be the x factor(pun intended) here as Rogue was able to save Gambit thanks to the power up boost he gave her from apocalypse’s power out of love. Also, a nice parallel with how x ternal betrayed apocalypse when she got that power because Apocalypse has never been loved in his life, while Rogue uses it to double down on her love for Remy. Ending of the episode sets us up for an interesting finale, I’m still 90 percent sure that Valerie Cooper is gonna end up being Mystique, what her ultimate plan is still remains unknown, but there’s no way we go 2 seasons without seeing her, right? #xmen97 #xmen

Honestly gambit can do no wrong in my eyes because he’s been done so bold in this show. Got cucked all season 1 by the WORST ship in comic history ultimately rejected by the woman he loved, even when she ain’t deserve it, dies in the most heroic manner possible, then even in death, he can’t rest because apocalypse is using him as a pawn. Has to be the most tragic character in the show and I’ll always be his biggest apologist. Idk how I feel about this week’s episode because it seems like the pacing was all over the place, as has been a theme this season in general, but I do like being right. Called earlier that Rogue and Apocalypse conversation about love would be the x factor(pun intended) here as Rogue was able to save Gambit thanks to the power up boost he gave her from apocalypse’s power out of love. Also, a nice parallel with how x ternal betrayed apocalypse when she got that power because Apocalypse has never been loved in his life, while Rogue uses it to double down on her love for Remy. Ending of the episode sets us up for an interesting finale, I’m still 90 percent sure that Valerie Cooper is gonna end up being Mystique, what her ultimate plan is still remains unknown, but there’s no way we go 2 seasons without seeing her, right? #xmen97 #xmen

優木せつ菜 🇯🇵 ❤️‍🔥| Head HACHU and MY

30,516 次观看 • 1 个月前

“YOU’RE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST!” This is a loose term being thrown around to vilify Christians today, and we must define the term. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who believes Christianity should be forced onto people by the state… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who believes in no separation between Church and state… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who worships a political party above God and will remain loyal to that party even if they begin rejecting God’s standards… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. But if, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who loves God first, loves their nation and believes that Christianity is the best moral framework for a civilisation… then yes - I’m a Christian nationalist. “You can’t legislate morality!” All laws legislate morality. All laws declare your behaviour either as right or wrong. Morality is the one thing that should be the foundation of our laws. It shouldn’t just be up to whoever is in power to decide right and wrong - good and evil? As Aristotle famously observed that “all law rests on a necessary foundation of morality.” So the question is never WILL morality be legislated - but WHOSE morality will be legislated. What do you think is the best moral framework for a civilisation? Atheism? Secularism? Islamism? I can confidently say, I believe CHRISTIANITY is the BEST MORAL FRAMEWORK.

“YOU’RE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST!” This is a loose term being thrown around to vilify Christians today, and we must define the term. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who believes Christianity should be forced onto people by the state… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who believes in no separation between Church and state… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. If, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who worships a political party above God and will remain loyal to that party even if they begin rejecting God’s standards… then no, I’m not a Christian nationalist. But if, by Christian nationalist, you mean someone who loves God first, loves their nation and believes that Christianity is the best moral framework for a civilisation… then yes - I’m a Christian nationalist. “You can’t legislate morality!” All laws legislate morality. All laws declare your behaviour either as right or wrong. Morality is the one thing that should be the foundation of our laws. It shouldn’t just be up to whoever is in power to decide right and wrong - good and evil? As Aristotle famously observed that “all law rests on a necessary foundation of morality.” So the question is never WILL morality be legislated - but WHOSE morality will be legislated. What do you think is the best moral framework for a civilisation? Atheism? Secularism? Islamism? I can confidently say, I believe CHRISTIANITY is the BEST MORAL FRAMEWORK.

Millicent Sedra

49,349 次观看 • 10 个月前

WOW! Suing the HOA! Bought a house in Austin last year. Three months later he finds out it’s in an HOA. Not “maybe.” Not “we think.” Full-blown mandatory HOA that somehow never made it through closing. No docs, no transfer fees paid by the seller, nothing. Just “congrats on your new house… oh by the way, here’s the bill and the rulebook.” Comments were flying with the usual internet law degrees: “Just don’t sign and you’re not in it.” “They can’t take your house.” “HOAs have no real power.” Wrong. If the covenants run with the land, you’re in it whether you signed a fresh piece of paper or not. And yes, they can put a lien on you and in extreme cases push foreclosure. Uncommon, but very real. This one’s different though. The paperwork never happened the way it’s supposed to. Seller didn’t pay the transfer, title company and agents apparently slept through it, and this guy only found out after the fact. That’s why the lawyers are involved now. Somebody dropped the ball hard. Could be the seller, the agent, the title company… or all of them. He’s keeping quiet until the legal side is sorted, which is smart. But the principle is simple: you should know exactly what you’re buying before you sign. Not three months later when the HOA letter shows up. Homeownership already comes with enough headaches. Getting ambushed by an HOA after closing shouldn’t be one of them. Do you live in an HOA?

WOW! Suing the HOA! Bought a house in Austin last year. Three months later he finds out it’s in an HOA. Not “maybe.” Not “we think.” Full-blown mandatory HOA that somehow never made it through closing. No docs, no transfer fees paid by the seller, nothing. Just “congrats on your new house… oh by the way, here’s the bill and the rulebook.” Comments were flying with the usual internet law degrees: “Just don’t sign and you’re not in it.” “They can’t take your house.” “HOAs have no real power.” Wrong. If the covenants run with the land, you’re in it whether you signed a fresh piece of paper or not. And yes, they can put a lien on you and in extreme cases push foreclosure. Uncommon, but very real. This one’s different though. The paperwork never happened the way it’s supposed to. Seller didn’t pay the transfer, title company and agents apparently slept through it, and this guy only found out after the fact. That’s why the lawyers are involved now. Somebody dropped the ball hard. Could be the seller, the agent, the title company… or all of them. He’s keeping quiet until the legal side is sorted, which is smart. But the principle is simple: you should know exactly what you’re buying before you sign. Not three months later when the HOA letter shows up. Homeownership already comes with enough headaches. Getting ambushed by an HOA after closing shouldn’t be one of them. Do you live in an HOA?

AmericanPapaBear™

54,865 次观看 • 1 个月前

Bill Gates walked into the Tesla Gigafactory and declared the long-range electric semi impossible. The truck was already in production. Pepsi was running it on live routes. Musk: “I was like, well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now.” Gates was standing inside the factory that built the vehicle he was dismissing. It existed. It was moving freight. Musk: “He’s like, ‘No, no, it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work.’ And I’m like… I’m kind of stuck here.” Musk didn’t argue. He asked for the math. Musk: “You must think we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high. Which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” Gates didn’t have wrong numbers. He had no numbers. Musk: “He didn’t know any of the numbers.” The co-founder of Microsoft walked into an operating factory, stood next to a truck hauling Pepsi’s freight, and declared it impossible without a single figure. No energy density. No efficiency metric. No math. Just conviction wearing a $130 billion net worth as a credential. Musk: “Doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?” One question. Nowhere left to stand. Musk: “You’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, he is not strong in the sciences. It is really surprising.” Gates built his empire on software. Abstraction. Code that never has to satisfy a physics equation. Musk builds in atoms. Battery cells have energy densities. Truck chassis have drag coefficients. A semi either makes the route or it doesn’t. There is no patch. Physics does not negotiate. Thirty years inside abstraction and a man starts believing his intuition applies everywhere. It doesn’t. The truck exists. The routes are logged. Pepsi is running them. Gates declared it impossible and couldn’t produce the math to prove it. The truck already had.

Bill Gates walked into the Tesla Gigafactory and declared the long-range electric semi impossible. The truck was already in production. Pepsi was running it on live routes. Musk: “I was like, well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now.” Gates was standing inside the factory that built the vehicle he was dismissing. It existed. It was moving freight. Musk: “He’s like, ‘No, no, it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work.’ And I’m like… I’m kind of stuck here.” Musk didn’t argue. He asked for the math. Musk: “You must think we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high. Which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” Gates didn’t have wrong numbers. He had no numbers. Musk: “He didn’t know any of the numbers.” The co-founder of Microsoft walked into an operating factory, stood next to a truck hauling Pepsi’s freight, and declared it impossible without a single figure. No energy density. No efficiency metric. No math. Just conviction wearing a $130 billion net worth as a credential. Musk: “Doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?” One question. Nowhere left to stand. Musk: “You’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, he is not strong in the sciences. It is really surprising.” Gates built his empire on software. Abstraction. Code that never has to satisfy a physics equation. Musk builds in atoms. Battery cells have energy densities. Truck chassis have drag coefficients. A semi either makes the route or it doesn’t. There is no patch. Physics does not negotiate. Thirty years inside abstraction and a man starts believing his intuition applies everywhere. It doesn’t. The truck exists. The routes are logged. Pepsi is running them. Gates declared it impossible and couldn’t produce the math to prove it. The truck already had.

Dustin

610,140 次观看 • 5 个月前

Demis Hassabis is after something no civilization has ever had. The right to be wrong twice. Hassabis: “AI itself will maybe unlock new sciences… the one I’m particularly excited about is AI for simulations.” We assume some fields became sciences because their subjects were simple enough to pin down. That has it backwards. Hassabis: “Why aren’t they just sciences like physics today? Because the problem is they’re emergent systems… it’s very hard to do repeated controlled experiments.” A field becomes a science the moment failure inside it gets cheap. Chemistry got the beaker. Aerospace got the wind tunnel. Software got to break something at four in the morning and have it running by five. The fields that never made the jump are the ones where the experiment is the population. Hassabis: “If you raise interest rates by half a percent, you have to do it in the real world and then see what happens. You can have theories, but you can’t run it thousands of times.” Economics. Policy. War. Education. Not soft. Just unrehearsed. Everything we believe about how societies work came out of a single run. One history, no control group, no second pass. We ran it once, on everyone, and wrote down what happened. Every principle we govern by has a sample size of one. And we still built all of this. Hassabis: “If you could simulate things really accurately, then maybe there’s sort of new sciences to be done where you can rigorously sample from a very accurate simulator.” What he is describing is not better forecasting. It is the first rehearsal history has ever been given. Crash an economy inside the model. Find out exactly why it broke. Change one variable and run it again. The right to be wrong has always been rationed. You get to experiment on the world in rough proportion to how much of it you already control. Everyone else lives inside the results. That was never a moral failure of the people in charge. It was a hard limit on how many times reality can be run. Lift the limit and the monopoly on experimentation goes with it. Every real leap in human capability has been the same move. Something irreversible becoming something repeatable. Writing made memory checkable. The draft made thought revisable. The prototype made building into something you could get wrong on purpose. Civilization never got that upgrade. Every decision it made was final on impact. Hassabis: “That will allow us to make much better decisions in these, today, what are very uncertain domains.” Almost everything you know was paid for by someone who never agreed to the price. Every generation before this one paid for what it learned in people. We might be the first that gets to pay in electricity.

Demis Hassabis is after something no civilization has ever had. The right to be wrong twice. Hassabis: “AI itself will maybe unlock new sciences… the one I’m particularly excited about is AI for simulations.” We assume some fields became sciences because their subjects were simple enough to pin down. That has it backwards. Hassabis: “Why aren’t they just sciences like physics today? Because the problem is they’re emergent systems… it’s very hard to do repeated controlled experiments.” A field becomes a science the moment failure inside it gets cheap. Chemistry got the beaker. Aerospace got the wind tunnel. Software got to break something at four in the morning and have it running by five. The fields that never made the jump are the ones where the experiment is the population. Hassabis: “If you raise interest rates by half a percent, you have to do it in the real world and then see what happens. You can have theories, but you can’t run it thousands of times.” Economics. Policy. War. Education. Not soft. Just unrehearsed. Everything we believe about how societies work came out of a single run. One history, no control group, no second pass. We ran it once, on everyone, and wrote down what happened. Every principle we govern by has a sample size of one. And we still built all of this. Hassabis: “If you could simulate things really accurately, then maybe there’s sort of new sciences to be done where you can rigorously sample from a very accurate simulator.” What he is describing is not better forecasting. It is the first rehearsal history has ever been given. Crash an economy inside the model. Find out exactly why it broke. Change one variable and run it again. The right to be wrong has always been rationed. You get to experiment on the world in rough proportion to how much of it you already control. Everyone else lives inside the results. That was never a moral failure of the people in charge. It was a hard limit on how many times reality can be run. Lift the limit and the monopoly on experimentation goes with it. Every real leap in human capability has been the same move. Something irreversible becoming something repeatable. Writing made memory checkable. The draft made thought revisable. The prototype made building into something you could get wrong on purpose. Civilization never got that upgrade. Every decision it made was final on impact. Hassabis: “That will allow us to make much better decisions in these, today, what are very uncertain domains.” Almost everything you know was paid for by someone who never agreed to the price. Every generation before this one paid for what it learned in people. We might be the first that gets to pay in electricity.

Dustin

15,262 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jerry Seinfeld was offered $110 million to make one more season of his show, but he said no. Why? Dosage. Even the best things get boring when they drag on for too long. Seinfeld says: "Leave the audience wanting more." Here are his rules for comedy: 1. Talent wins: "Get good at something. That’s it. Everything else is bullshit.” 2. Embrace the difficulty of writing: The problem with writing isn’t that it’s hard. The problem is that people want it to be easy, so they run away when it gets difficult. 3. Seinfeld's writing routine: Full focus, no distractions, do it every day. 4. Want to crush your creative spirit? Aim to make something that everybody will like. 5. "If you're efficient, you're doing it the wrong way. The right way is the hard way." 6. The work never stops: Good comedians are always looking for jokes. 7. Coming up with new ideas is important, editing is important, but it's important that you don't try to do both at the same time. 8. Cut the distractions when you write. No Twitter, no Instagram, no texting, no email. Seinfeld says: “You can’t do anything else. You don’t have to write, but you can’t do anything else.” 9. Distraction is the enemy. It's not just getting distracted during writing sessions that crushes productivity. It's building a distracting life that kills people. Seinfeld skipped the admin work, skipped the speaking opportunities, and skipped all the schmoozing that famous people get into. 10. Forget about your audience: The fountain of creativity cannot flow when the judgmental eye of your audience is top of mind as you're creating. 11. Write a lot, publish a little. 12. Never stop focusing on the craft: Seinfeld says that in most TV shows, the writers spend roughly half their time working on the show and the other half dealing with nonsense. But Seinfeld and Larry David spent 99% of their time writing. Just the two of them. With the door closed. That's just a taste. There's so much more in the video below. It's a 45-minute distillation of Seinfeld's writing process. Unlike most How I Write episodes, this one is a monologue, not an interview. I've also published it on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, and shared the links in the reply tweets.

Jerry Seinfeld was offered $110 million to make one more season of his show, but he said no. Why? Dosage. Even the best things get boring when they drag on for too long. Seinfeld says: "Leave the audience wanting more." Here are his rules for comedy: 1. Talent wins: "Get good at something. That’s it. Everything else is bullshit.” 2. Embrace the difficulty of writing: The problem with writing isn’t that it’s hard. The problem is that people want it to be easy, so they run away when it gets difficult. 3. Seinfeld's writing routine: Full focus, no distractions, do it every day. 4. Want to crush your creative spirit? Aim to make something that everybody will like. 5. "If you're efficient, you're doing it the wrong way. The right way is the hard way." 6. The work never stops: Good comedians are always looking for jokes. 7. Coming up with new ideas is important, editing is important, but it's important that you don't try to do both at the same time. 8. Cut the distractions when you write. No Twitter, no Instagram, no texting, no email. Seinfeld says: “You can’t do anything else. You don’t have to write, but you can’t do anything else.” 9. Distraction is the enemy. It's not just getting distracted during writing sessions that crushes productivity. It's building a distracting life that kills people. Seinfeld skipped the admin work, skipped the speaking opportunities, and skipped all the schmoozing that famous people get into. 10. Forget about your audience: The fountain of creativity cannot flow when the judgmental eye of your audience is top of mind as you're creating. 11. Write a lot, publish a little. 12. Never stop focusing on the craft: Seinfeld says that in most TV shows, the writers spend roughly half their time working on the show and the other half dealing with nonsense. But Seinfeld and Larry David spent 99% of their time writing. Just the two of them. With the door closed. That's just a taste. There's so much more in the video below. It's a 45-minute distillation of Seinfeld's writing process. Unlike most How I Write episodes, this one is a monologue, not an interview. I've also published it on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, and shared the links in the reply tweets.

David Perell

84,874 次观看 • 2 年前

This simple pizza delivery turned into a full-blown standoff at the front door 😬 The driver shows up and asks for $54.74. The homeowner hands him a $100 bill and asks for $35 back, says he specifically told the store when he placed the order that he’d be paying with a hundred and needed change. Driver: “I only have $15 on me. I was never told about the $100.” Homeowner keeps repeating: “I told them I was paying with $100.” Driver offers: “You can call the store right now and give them your credit card info.” But the homeowner isn’t having it: “Come back with my change.” Driver: “I can’t, it’s the busiest night of the year.” Homeowner: “That’s not my problem. I told your company.” Driver threatens to take the pizza back. Homeowner: “That’s not gonna happen.” Driver: “You can’t just take the pizza for free! “Are you kidding me?!” Homeowner: No... as he shuts the door. Who do you think is in the wrong here? The homeowner for paying with a big bill or the driver/store for showing up under-equipped on their busiest night? 🤷

This simple pizza delivery turned into a full-blown standoff at the front door 😬 The driver shows up and asks for $54.74. The homeowner hands him a $100 bill and asks for $35 back, says he specifically told the store when he placed the order that he’d be paying with a hundred and needed change. Driver: “I only have $15 on me. I was never told about the $100.” Homeowner keeps repeating: “I told them I was paying with $100.” Driver offers: “You can call the store right now and give them your credit card info.” But the homeowner isn’t having it: “Come back with my change.” Driver: “I can’t, it’s the busiest night of the year.” Homeowner: “That’s not my problem. I told your company.” Driver threatens to take the pizza back. Homeowner: “That’s not gonna happen.” Driver: “You can’t just take the pizza for free! “Are you kidding me?!” Homeowner: No... as he shuts the door. Who do you think is in the wrong here? The homeowner for paying with a big bill or the driver/store for showing up under-equipped on their busiest night? 🤷

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

230,989 次观看 • 6 个月前