Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨‼️ CASE UPDATE: The same girl who was labeled a ‘victim’ comes forward in a SECOND video claiming Romanian authorities threatened her not to expose what they told her:😳 “They even offered me money to claim I’m a victim of cr*me that never even happened.” “I was never a...

52,900 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“WRETCHED SAINTS” AND ALEX JURADO SCANDAL The Unapologetic Apologist (aka “The Unapologetic Apologist,” hereafter TUA), who apparently has firsthand knowledge of the facts, posted this video explanation on his Instagram account earlier today (sometime after Voice Of Reason released his statement): Since I know nothing about “Wretched Saints” (real name = Jerett), my primary interest is in TUA’s testimony regarding Jurado: “What I know to be true as of right now: Alex met a 16-year-old girl when he was either 19 or 20, back [on] January 1st of 2016. He was a catechist, she was in some sort of teen program in the church, but he was not her catechist — he had no direct role of authority over her — but he was older than her, like by three, maybe four years. ... Now, I’ve spoken to the victim directly, who has said she was 16 when they met, so the age of the victim at the time was 16. She told me that they had sex. Alex told someone else, who then told me, that they did not have sex at that age. So, Alex is not saying that they never had sex, but that they didn’t have sex at that age, according to my sources. The victim is claiming otherwise, so this is a detail that is still uncertain. As for the other text messages with adult women — stuff as recent as July of this year (earlier this month), saying really disgusting things — that’s all real. All of the screenshots that you have seen are real.” After presenting the facts, TUA comments: “Now, even if the girl was 16 and Alex and her didn’t have sex, that is still a horrible, scandalous thing to talk to a minor in that way. If they did have sex: horrible, scandalous. ... Alex should step back from Voice of Reason, due to these allegations.... As for Voice of Reason, he was already a Catholic while he was doing these things. He was already confirmed and he was doing them very, very recently as a public apologist. He has no position as an apologist anymore, as far as I’m concerned.” Well said, TUA. I agree completely, which is why I once again urge Amigo de Frodo of Brownsville Diocese to investigate these matters and not allow a morally degenerate man to address a young adult conference in his diocese.

Matt Gaspers

32,455 просмотров • 1 год назад