Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS - Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws. Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director,... show more
1,412,427 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1989509985777455318/amplify_video_thumb/1989506910882861057/img/R4WaQLZBKOd2Q4YX.jpg)
![Whitney Webb warned us about what would happen with RFK Jr. at HHS—she is 100% vindicated: "You have to wonder why Trump decided to appoint RFK Jr. as head of HHS and... [Peter Thiel puppet] Jim O' Neill as the Deputy HHS Secretary...[that] conflict [is] rather [jarring]... the fact that O' Neill in his position, if confirmed, would be managing the day-to-day operations of HHS, including what the FDA does, what the CDC does, and things of that nature, he could easily undermine any sort of MAHA policy that RFK tries to impose." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb) is taken from a January 31, 2025 interview with Clayton Morris (Clayton Morris) posted to the Redacted (Redacted) YouTube channel. For reference, Jim O'Neill, a puppet boy of technocrat goblin Peter Thiel, served as managing director of Mithril Capital Management from 2012 through 2019. Mithril was co-founded by Thiel. O'Neill was also the CEO of Peter Thiel's Thiel Foundation from 2009 through 2012. Furthermore, O'Neill co-founded the Thiel Fellowship in 2010. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Well, you have to wonder why Trump decided to appoint RFK Jr. As head of HHS and then appoint Jim O' Neill as the Deputy HHS Secretary. Because, yes, it absolutely does seem to conflict rather jarringly. And the fact that O' Neill in his position, if confirmed, would be managing the day-to-day operations of HHS, including what the FDA does, what the CDC does and things of that nature, he could easily undermine any sort of MAHA policy that RFK tries to impose. "And also the Chief of staff that was appointed to essentially manage, you know, RF RFK's portfolio, who's going to be the chief of staff, for him is a woman named Heather Flick, who was previously played a major role in HHS under Trump's previous HHS Secretary, Alex Azar, who is a former head of Eli Lilly, a major pharmaceutical company, and has sort of been blamed for some of the big pharma patronage that happened in the, you know, early COVID-19 era, before the Biden administration came in. And you know, she's essentially been framed as someone that will keep, you know, basically babysit RFK Jr. At least that's sort of how the Wall Street Journal recently framed it. And what exactly does that mean when you combine her appointment with someone like, you know, Jim O'Neill being deputy? "And so essentially what I think people should look at again is even if RFK is confirmed, there needs to be a focus and pressure placed on these other people. And that's especially true of someone like Jim O'Neill who also has to go through, confirmation. So anyone that is, you know, vocally supporting, you know, RFK Jr. With the hopes that he'll fulfill part of this broader Make America Healthy Again agenda should also consider opposing the confirmation of Jim O'Neill. And also opposing this, you know, this type of deregulatory paradigm that he wants to impose. "Because, of course, Jim O'Neill frames it is free market innovation. But it would just be a field day for crony capitalism at the end of the day. And also, I forgot to add, one of the other, some of the figures that have inspired that he's cited as inspiring his views on eliminate eliminating efficacy testing. Say that the efficacy data should be tested on patients after these drugs are administered to them, through biosurveillance, including through digital wearables. And that big pharmaceutical companies, the producers of those products should be given access to the data so that they can jack up the price, you know, depending on how quote, unquote effective, the drug is based on this, this data. "And it's also a way to surveil, you know, what's going on inside people's bodies, which is eerily reminiscent of things said by people like Yuval Noah Harari, you know, who's, you know, affiliated with the World Economic Forum, talking about the utility, how the next frontier of mass surveillance is to surveil what's going on inside people's bodies. And it's quite disturbing that Palantir has now taken over major functions of HHS, including at the CDC, and other aspects, of, of agency functions. And because of O'Neill's deep ties to both Palantir and Peter Thiel, it's likely that he'll push for a deepening of those ties. "And Palantir is really the engine that the mass surveillance state runs on. It's a contractor, contractor to every single US intelligence agency, all 18 of them, as well as HHS, and it's currently operating programs within HHS that are trying to use Americans healthcare data to try and predict when people will get sick before they show symptoms. And one of their programs with the CDC has the potential to push for the declaration of a next pandemic before anyone shows symptoms."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1990323050387231164/amplify_video_thumb/1990319805665292288/img/39ULIl3PI2DGzFxH.jpg)
![The OBAMA administration was making so many unauthorized payments to PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES participating in OBAMACARE that they couldn't even keep up to cover their own tracks. A government watchdog has determined the Obama administration is violating its own health care law by illegally diverting up to $5 billion to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare. The U.S. Government Accountability Office is the nonpartisan federal watchdog that determines whether federal officials are spending taxpayer dollars in accordance with the law. In a legal opinion issued last week, the GAO accused the Obama administration of illegally diverting billions of taxpayer dollars to private insurance companies. The opinion concerned the administration’s implementation of Obamacare’s “reinsurance” program, one of several insurer bailouts designed to prop up Obamacare’s rickety finances. Generally speaking, the reinsurance program taxes consumers in non-Obamacare plans to subsidize insurers who sell Obamacare plans. The program collects $25 billion from consumers, with $20 billion going to Obamacare-participating insurers and $5 billion to the federal treasury. The law is specific: the amount that each health insurance issuer pays toward the $5 billion designated for the U.S. Treasury “may not be used for the [reinsurance] program.” But once insurance companies participating in Obamacare’s Exchanges started suffering huge losses and heading for the exits, the administration began funneling them the money that was supposed to go to the Treasury. The administration has so far diverted $3 billion — and counting. The administration was making so many unauthorized payments to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare that it’s hard to keep them straight. Both the administration and the Supreme Court acknowledge that the operative text of the Affordable Care Act forbids certain payments to insurers participating in federally-run exchanges. The administration is paying tens of billions of dollars to such insurers because it was able to convince the court to bless those payments anyway. It is making payments to insurers on behalf of exchange enrollees who are categorically ineligible for subsidies because they have incomes below the poverty line. It is paying insurers tens of billions of dollars in illegal “cost-sharing” payments that a federal judge ruled “violate the Constitution.” It is attempting to skirt a congressional ban on $2.5 billion in “risk corridor” payments to insurers that President Obama himself signed into law. It is even making illegal payments to insurance companies on behalf of members of Congress and their staff — giving Congress its own special exemption from Obamacare. Consistent with past practice, the Obama administration is thumbing its nose at the nonpartisan GAO by announcing it will continue to divert these taxpayer funds to insurance companies. If the rule of law means anything, it is that the government is as bound by law, as are the people. If the people come to believe that the government is not, they will rightly conclude neither are they.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1987736396522512880/ext_tw_video_thumb/1987736365669199872/pu/img/PrSDzf0v-bOiqebw.jpg)
![HOLY SMOKES: Smug AP reporter’s question BACKFIRES spectacularly after she claims the government already investigates vaccine injuries. This launched RFK Jr. into a three-minute tirade, masterfully proving why she’s wrong. AP: “Secretary Kennedy, the report lays out some changes for vaccine injuries and how those will be investigated. Can you expand more on how that process will look differently than it already does, since the government does investigate vaccine injuries currently?” Kennedy wasn’t letting her get away with that claim. First, he explained how 80% of people who try to report a vaccine injury give up because the current system makes it so difficult to actually file a report. Then he detailed how doctors are discouraged from reporting because VAERS is such a hassle—it takes 30 minutes of their time, and they don’t get compensated. Finally came the closer: Kennedy revealed there was once a far better system than VAERS, a machine-counting system that actually worked. But the CDC scrapped it because it was too effective, keeping instead “this old system that everybody has recognized has been broken for [40] years.” “Under the current system, most of those vaccine injuries will remain invisible,” Kennedy lamented. “None of the people who reported injuries are ever followed up with. “We are recasting the entire program so that vaccine injuries will be reported, they will be studied, and that individuals who suffer them will not be denied or marginalized or vilified or gaslighted. They will be welcomed. And we will learn everything that we can about them so that we can improve the safety of these products,” he said.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1965517267120091314/amplify_video_thumb/1965516307568160768/img/BRPyYqFHqYgUUKms.jpg)
