Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

CBC's lo longer fact checking election statements. They are lazily attacking anything they view as an attack on Liberals and their decade of economic mismanagement. Watch the first video is from the massive Edmonton rally where he describes the difference in Canada between a decade ago and now: low...

cbcwatcher's profile picture

cbcwatcher

39,793 subscribers

22,010 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikFinansHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

They Shall Know No Fear profil fotoğrafı
They Shall Know No Fear1 yıl önce

CBC is Liberal Pravda.

Statler Whitmire 🇨🇦🍎 profil fotoğrafı
Statler Whitmire 🇨🇦🍎1 yıl önce

@DanKnightMMA Well this CBC “fact checker”, hides his bias better than Rachel Gilmore

BernieB profil fotoğrafı
BernieB1 yıl önce

@DanKnightMMA Unfkg believable how we donate $1.3B to a liberal propaganda station.

Doug Moore profil fotoğrafı
Doug Moore1 yıl önce

@CBCNews fact checking every nook and Carney...nothing gets by them...even on a slow day

republicEn.org profil fotoğrafı
republicEn.org2 yıl önce

I'm not a Liberal, but I care about climate change. Click the video below & sign the Petition: Conservative Climate Leadership in America. 🇺🇸

ram johal profil fotoğrafı
ram johal1 yıl önce

Of course they picked Canadians Net worth because the housing prices doubled in 2016-2017. Most of Canadians net worth is their primary residence.

JarbyMcGroo profil fotoğrafı
JarbyMcGroo1 yıl önce

@DanKnightMMA Blaming housing costs on COVID, which was 5 years into the Liberal government already, as if everything was under control prior. 😂

Doug Ouellette profil fotoğrafı
Doug Ouellette1 yıl önce

CBC just trying to save their jobs. #Pravda

Regulus Coeur profil fotoğrafı
Regulus Coeur1 yıl önce

don't expect anything from Elections Canada, I'm convinced they're compromised too.

Reese Quinn-WHEREdidCANADAgo? profil fotoğrafı
Reese Quinn-WHEREdidCANADAgo?1 yıl önce

This is hilarious from the communist broadcasting system.

GolfGuy profil fotoğrafı
GolfGuy1 yıl önce

Good thing nobody watches CBC except my parents. (and you, of course)

Benzer Videolar

Must watch. Everything that is wrong with CBC controlling the narrative in a single exchange! Kenney "Is that an objective CBC fact check statement?" Rosie "Yes" Kenney "I guess it reads to the CBC differently, but it reads to me like a Trudeau platform." Rosie "You can read that way, but that is not." At CBC, you can have an opinion, but unless it is CBC approved, it's not the correct one Rosie gives her opinion as fact and moves on... to the other Liberal on the panel Rosemary Barton Jason Kenney 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇮🇱 Brodie Fenlon
1:20

Must watch. Everything that is wrong with CBC controlling the narrative in a single exchange! Kenney "Is that an objective CBC fact check statement?" Rosie "Yes" Kenney "I guess it reads to the CBC differently, but it reads to me like a Trudeau platform." Rosie "You can read that way, but that is not." At CBC, you can have an opinion, but unless it is CBC approved, it's not the correct one Rosie gives her opinion as fact and moves on... to the other Liberal on the panel Rosemary Barton Jason Kenney 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇮🇱 Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

488,197 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

And just to dispel any notion that CBC isn't an arm of the Liberal government, here was Janyce McGregor both before and after Poilievre's speech "fact checking" his immigration numbers using Liberal released statements Janyce was "fact checking" Poilievre before he even spoke and after with the "immigration minister's office". Compare with the numbers listed from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) below CBC can't even be bothered to hide it /2
2:13

And just to dispel any notion that CBC isn't an arm of the Liberal government, here was Janyce McGregor both before and after Poilievre's speech "fact checking" his immigration numbers using Liberal released statements Janyce was "fact checking" Poilievre before he even spoke and after with the "immigration minister's office". Compare with the numbers listed from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) below CBC can't even be bothered to hide it /2

cbcwatcher

27,554 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BOOM! Extraordinary that we have to hear this from a former British MP on CBC And Ian Hanomansing acts surprised after CBC and Liberal MPS called people racist for saying what Andrew Percy says here: "I think there are, and one of the biggest ones is, of course, in the UK, the electorate told me people who were in elected office, three elections, the Brexit referendum in, two general elections, were concerned about the large numbers of and the failings of the immigration system." And he describes CBC "And to be perfectly frank, we in the mainstream didn't in fact, too many people in the mainstream closed down legitimate criticisms of the immigration system." And more about CBC "By telling anybody who wanted to raised some legitimate concerns that they were a bigot or a racist, we've ended up fueling, I think, the rise of this populism." ON CBC! This is an interview about Liberal MPs and CBC itself! Watch it all! Brodie Fenlon Craft Politics
4:02

BOOM! Extraordinary that we have to hear this from a former British MP on CBC And Ian Hanomansing acts surprised after CBC and Liberal MPS called people racist for saying what Andrew Percy says here: "I think there are, and one of the biggest ones is, of course, in the UK, the electorate told me people who were in elected office, three elections, the Brexit referendum in, two general elections, were concerned about the large numbers of and the failings of the immigration system." And he describes CBC "And to be perfectly frank, we in the mainstream didn't in fact, too many people in the mainstream closed down legitimate criticisms of the immigration system." And more about CBC "By telling anybody who wanted to raised some legitimate concerns that they were a bigot or a racist, we've ended up fueling, I think, the rise of this populism." ON CBC! This is an interview about Liberal MPs and CBC itself! Watch it all! Brodie Fenlon Craft Politics

cbcwatcher

68,647 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Rare CBC panel consensus - no Carney budget makes no sense! Fred DeLorey "It goes against the entire narrative of Carney that he is the man with a plan." "That's what he told Canadians and it's why he won this last election." "They believed he had a plan and in fact he used it as an attack point. You know, a plan beats no plan." "He has no plan" Greg MacEachern "Probably going to tick off a lot of Liberals here, but I don't disagree." "I did not necessarily expect a budget. I did expect an economic update of some sort." "...There were lots of ways to communicate around this, but there's really been nothing." Fred DeLorey Greg MacEachern
3:34

Rare CBC panel consensus - no Carney budget makes no sense! Fred DeLorey "It goes against the entire narrative of Carney that he is the man with a plan." "That's what he told Canadians and it's why he won this last election." "They believed he had a plan and in fact he used it as an attack point. You know, a plan beats no plan." "He has no plan" Greg MacEachern "Probably going to tick off a lot of Liberals here, but I don't disagree." "I did not necessarily expect a budget. I did expect an economic update of some sort." "...There were lots of ways to communicate around this, but there's really been nothing." Fred DeLorey Greg MacEachern

cbcwatcher

116,957 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here is a clip from last night's Poilievre's rally that CBC News isn't showing today because their survival depends on creating the false illusion that Carney can control Trump "Almost every country in the world got a pause on American tariffs, but not us." "Almost every country in the world got a pause on American tariffs, but not us. He said that he had made progress with the President. What progress?" "And no one can control this president." " Carney is running his entire campaign on a false promise that he can control the President through magical, masterful negotiating techniques. Well, we know now that that is not true." "Carney would ask you to overlook an entire decade of rising costs and crime and falling economy that is under the thumb of the Americans simply because he promises that somehow he's a master negotiator." "What we are deciding in this election is can we afford a fourth liberal term of rising costs and crime and a weakened economy?" Pierre Poilievre
3:19

Here is a clip from last night's Poilievre's rally that CBC News isn't showing today because their survival depends on creating the false illusion that Carney can control Trump "Almost every country in the world got a pause on American tariffs, but not us." "Almost every country in the world got a pause on American tariffs, but not us. He said that he had made progress with the President. What progress?" "And no one can control this president." " Carney is running his entire campaign on a false promise that he can control the President through magical, masterful negotiating techniques. Well, we know now that that is not true." "Carney would ask you to overlook an entire decade of rising costs and crime and falling economy that is under the thumb of the Americans simply because he promises that somehow he's a master negotiator." "What we are deciding in this election is can we afford a fourth liberal term of rising costs and crime and a weakened economy?" Pierre Poilievre

cbcwatcher

47,325 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

CBC reporter on site for Poilievre 'Canada First' rally tries to say that Liberal Wilfird Laurier was the first to use the 'Canada First' slogan "Canada First, as they've been saying, which of course is a Wilfred Laurier saying, a liberal prime minister that's being co opted by the crowd here today." Laurier actually stole if from the 'Canada First' movement "The Canada First movement is a Canadian nationalist movement organized in 1868 that promoted the British Protestant component as central to Canadian identity. It was at first supported by Goldwin Smith and Edward Blake." But a little fact like that would never stop a CBC reporter from a gotcha moment Kate McKenna
1:04

CBC reporter on site for Poilievre 'Canada First' rally tries to say that Liberal Wilfird Laurier was the first to use the 'Canada First' slogan "Canada First, as they've been saying, which of course is a Wilfred Laurier saying, a liberal prime minister that's being co opted by the crowd here today." Laurier actually stole if from the 'Canada First' movement "The Canada First movement is a Canadian nationalist movement organized in 1868 that promoted the British Protestant component as central to Canadian identity. It was at first supported by Goldwin Smith and Edward Blake." But a little fact like that would never stop a CBC reporter from a gotcha moment Kate McKenna

cbcwatcher

227,529 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Today, in Melbourne, Brad Battin was rolled for Jess Wilson. It happened swiftly and without warning. Like thieves in the night they rolled in, and by morning, Brad was rolled out. Why? Surely there must be a reason. Maybe it was because he is a man. A mature man, with 50 years of life experience. Maybe it was because he had held a number of real jobs. Maybe it is because he served the state as a police officer. Maybe it is because he had owned and run a business. Maybe because he never was a staffer. Maybe it was because he didn’t come from Liberal royalty in Kooyong. Maybe it was because he was opening doors in new areas, places that had not considered voting Liberal before. Or maybe it was because he didn’t go to the right schools or move in the proper circles… Maybe. It could be because he was effective as an opposition leader. He was indeed shifting the polls and government policy - particularly on the youth crime epidemic plaguing Melbourne. It could even be because he was against “the Voice”, like most of the rest of his state. Maybe because he was against the treaty, that has put the property rights of all Victorians under a cloud. It is possible it was because he is against 100% renewables. Maybe he just wasn’t doing as he was told by the backroom boys - the lobbyists, the hacks and the spivs. It might even be because he knows what a woman is. Possibly some of those things… probably all of them. Because from out here, it looks like Jess Wilson is the solution to all of those ‘problems’. Just another young, inexperienced, former staffer. Just another progressive lady, who will solve the woman problem in the Liberal party, by helping the rest of us define it. Whatever the reason, I am sure the Liberals have just stolen defeat from the jaws of Victory as the inner-city elites that run the show shake their million dollar watches, fists clenched at the voters choosing Teal. As the former Liberal strongholds leave the blue team in their droves, in pursuit of a better brand of champagne socialism, they plant a foot squarely on the throats of the socially conservative and economically aspirational. The Liberals, desperate to chase back what they have lost, install Wilson in a pathetic last-ditch effort to woo them back. Demonstrating they too are happy to put the boot into those less progressive and more aspirational. People that just want to buy a home, pay the power bill, and maybe just run their homes in peace. Labor ran away from them long ago, as they pursued the same anti-Australian, anti-aspirational policies that please the Liberal lobbyists, Teal voters, Green voters, Unions and the Liberal backroom boys. The choice has never been less clear. Go with the progressive socialist that you know, or the progressive socialist that pretends to understand the economy better. The red or the blue, it’s up to you. Or maybe this is the election where the Liberals in Victoria go the way of SA, and WA, as they get packed into a minivan and sent away. One thing is for sure, the minor party and independent vote at the Victorian election will be record breaking, because the major parties are completely absorbed in their own brilliance. Completely wrapped up in themselves, holed up in their lavish offices as the groaning public feel the pain of decades of neglect. I would urge Brad Battin to hold his head up. His treatment by the corrupt and out of touch Victorian Liberal Party is a badge of honour. They are like the robbers he spent much of his career trying to catch. Like thieves in the night they shall slink off into the thickness of the dark. What happened to him today was very ‘modern’ Liberal, but hardly very Australian. I just want Australia back.
1:46

Today, in Melbourne, Brad Battin was rolled for Jess Wilson. It happened swiftly and without warning. Like thieves in the night they rolled in, and by morning, Brad was rolled out. Why? Surely there must be a reason. Maybe it was because he is a man. A mature man, with 50 years of life experience. Maybe it was because he had held a number of real jobs. Maybe it is because he served the state as a police officer. Maybe it is because he had owned and run a business. Maybe because he never was a staffer. Maybe it was because he didn’t come from Liberal royalty in Kooyong. Maybe it was because he was opening doors in new areas, places that had not considered voting Liberal before. Or maybe it was because he didn’t go to the right schools or move in the proper circles… Maybe. It could be because he was effective as an opposition leader. He was indeed shifting the polls and government policy - particularly on the youth crime epidemic plaguing Melbourne. It could even be because he was against “the Voice”, like most of the rest of his state. Maybe because he was against the treaty, that has put the property rights of all Victorians under a cloud. It is possible it was because he is against 100% renewables. Maybe he just wasn’t doing as he was told by the backroom boys - the lobbyists, the hacks and the spivs. It might even be because he knows what a woman is. Possibly some of those things… probably all of them. Because from out here, it looks like Jess Wilson is the solution to all of those ‘problems’. Just another young, inexperienced, former staffer. Just another progressive lady, who will solve the woman problem in the Liberal party, by helping the rest of us define it. Whatever the reason, I am sure the Liberals have just stolen defeat from the jaws of Victory as the inner-city elites that run the show shake their million dollar watches, fists clenched at the voters choosing Teal. As the former Liberal strongholds leave the blue team in their droves, in pursuit of a better brand of champagne socialism, they plant a foot squarely on the throats of the socially conservative and economically aspirational. The Liberals, desperate to chase back what they have lost, install Wilson in a pathetic last-ditch effort to woo them back. Demonstrating they too are happy to put the boot into those less progressive and more aspirational. People that just want to buy a home, pay the power bill, and maybe just run their homes in peace. Labor ran away from them long ago, as they pursued the same anti-Australian, anti-aspirational policies that please the Liberal lobbyists, Teal voters, Green voters, Unions and the Liberal backroom boys. The choice has never been less clear. Go with the progressive socialist that you know, or the progressive socialist that pretends to understand the economy better. The red or the blue, it’s up to you. Or maybe this is the election where the Liberals in Victoria go the way of SA, and WA, as they get packed into a minivan and sent away. One thing is for sure, the minor party and independent vote at the Victorian election will be record breaking, because the major parties are completely absorbed in their own brilliance. Completely wrapped up in themselves, holed up in their lavish offices as the groaning public feel the pain of decades of neglect. I would urge Brad Battin to hold his head up. His treatment by the corrupt and out of touch Victorian Liberal Party is a badge of honour. They are like the robbers he spent much of his career trying to catch. Like thieves in the night they shall slink off into the thickness of the dark. What happened to him today was very ‘modern’ Liberal, but hardly very Australian. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

89,051 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

CLEAR CBC FALSE REPORTING - Watch CBC senior reporter Marina von Stackelberg present a selectively edited version of Poilievre's answer below. It deliberately removes his criticism of CBC's correction She also lies: "Poilievre did not directly answer questions about his leadership or whether or not he was afraid that more conservatives would be leaving." Poilievre clearly answers the question with a "No" at the 2:15 mark of the video below. CBC's editing and reporting on this whole topic has been deeply flawed and deliberately misleading In addition to d'Entrement's lies that they continue to cover for, we now have CBC lying about Poilievre's answers Brodie Fenlon Maxime Bertrand Chris Carter
1:56

CLEAR CBC FALSE REPORTING - Watch CBC senior reporter Marina von Stackelberg present a selectively edited version of Poilievre's answer below. It deliberately removes his criticism of CBC's correction She also lies: "Poilievre did not directly answer questions about his leadership or whether or not he was afraid that more conservatives would be leaving." Poilievre clearly answers the question with a "No" at the 2:15 mark of the video below. CBC's editing and reporting on this whole topic has been deeply flawed and deliberately misleading In addition to d'Entrement's lies that they continue to cover for, we now have CBC lying about Poilievre's answers Brodie Fenlon Maxime Bertrand Chris Carter

cbcwatcher

198,023 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:52

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

322,205 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Real New Yorkers are asked how Zohran Mamdani is going as mayor, they say he is destroying their city and draining their money “There's such a delightful disconnect between how he's doing and how people think he's doing. He's doing terribly. There's homeless everywhere. They're just spending money they don't have But to these kids, just like they spend their parents' money on college, they actually think, "Oh, look, he balanced the budget." No, he borrowed $45 billion from the state, right. Then he deferred tax payments with interest or something. Like, this isn't success. It's not successful to defer payments you owe and to rack up debt to the state. But the problem, of course, people like this, he's so smart. He moved in here. He took advantage of liberal idiots who are not the people who voted, by the way — only, like, 10% of the city voted in the mayoral election — The people making the city make money are not voting for him. It's random losers. It's liberal white women. It's college students. It's Muslims. They voted for him, and now he took this thing that was built by the rich, that was built by the successful, and he's draining it of assets — It was never his to destroy, but it's his now” - Brookerteejones What actually happened was the state gave New York City extra money and permission to push pension payments further into the future Because of this Zohran Mamdani was able to act like the budget was balanced, but all they did was push the payments into the future But here’s what Zohran Mamdani isn’t telling you, by doing that, it means that New York City will actually owe an extra $8 billion over the next decade on top of what they pushed back It’s pure description and it’s bankrupting NYC So again, to give the illusion that the budget is balanced American taxpayers now owe an extra $8 billion they wouldn’t have had to pay because of Zohran Mamdani
2:08

Real New Yorkers are asked how Zohran Mamdani is going as mayor, they say he is destroying their city and draining their money “There's such a delightful disconnect between how he's doing and how people think he's doing. He's doing terribly. There's homeless everywhere. They're just spending money they don't have But to these kids, just like they spend their parents' money on college, they actually think, "Oh, look, he balanced the budget." No, he borrowed $45 billion from the state, right. Then he deferred tax payments with interest or something. Like, this isn't success. It's not successful to defer payments you owe and to rack up debt to the state. But the problem, of course, people like this, he's so smart. He moved in here. He took advantage of liberal idiots who are not the people who voted, by the way — only, like, 10% of the city voted in the mayoral election — The people making the city make money are not voting for him. It's random losers. It's liberal white women. It's college students. It's Muslims. They voted for him, and now he took this thing that was built by the rich, that was built by the successful, and he's draining it of assets — It was never his to destroy, but it's his now” - Brookerteejones What actually happened was the state gave New York City extra money and permission to push pension payments further into the future Because of this Zohran Mamdani was able to act like the budget was balanced, but all they did was push the payments into the future But here’s what Zohran Mamdani isn’t telling you, by doing that, it means that New York City will actually owe an extra $8 billion over the next decade on top of what they pushed back It’s pure description and it’s bankrupting NYC So again, to give the illusion that the budget is balanced American taxpayers now owe an extra $8 billion they wouldn’t have had to pay because of Zohran Mamdani

Wall Street Apes

63,867 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

CBC reporter Diego Pizarro "And in your view, is it helpful that Pierre Poilievre is promoting trade with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?" McGunty couldn't hear, Pizarro again "In your view, is it helpful that Pierre Poilievre is promoting trade with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?" McGuinty "I'm not sure I see a downside in promoting trade with Canada." CBC must be disappointed he didn't take the bait I'm betting CBC chase down the sh!t talking Marc Miller down for an answer. CBC's hits on Rogan and Poilievre for Carney just keep coming
1:36

CBC reporter Diego Pizarro "And in your view, is it helpful that Pierre Poilievre is promoting trade with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?" McGunty couldn't hear, Pizarro again "In your view, is it helpful that Pierre Poilievre is promoting trade with Canada on Joe Rogan's podcast?" McGuinty "I'm not sure I see a downside in promoting trade with Canada." CBC must be disappointed he didn't take the bait I'm betting CBC chase down the sh!t talking Marc Miller down for an answer. CBC's hits on Rogan and Poilievre for Carney just keep coming

cbcwatcher

42,996 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce