正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

CBI files its response on Arvind Kejriwal’s fresh affidavit. It does not dispute that: 1. Both the children of the Hon’ble Justice are on the Central Government panel. 2. ⁠That the Solicitor Geveral of India, Sh Tushar Mehta, who appears for CBI in this case, marks them matters that... show more

Devender Yadav (देव)

45,011 subscribers

59,252 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#WATCH | Delhi: On Arvind Kejriwal's acquittal in excise policy case, BJP MP Manoj Tiwari says, "The CBI is going to the High Court. We won't comment on any court, but we are confident that this case will go to the High Court and Arvind Kejriwal, the liquor scamster who looted Delhi, will be punished. This is their habit; they dance even after getting bail. The CBI has all the evidence, and we are confident that such corrupt people will be punished in the High Court..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Arvind Kejriwal's acquittal in excise policy case, BJP MP Manoj Tiwari says, "The CBI is going to the High Court. We won't comment on any court, but we are confident that this case will go to the High Court and Arvind Kejriwal, the liquor scamster who looted Delhi, will be punished. This is their habit; they dance even after getting bail. The CBI has all the evidence, and we are confident that such corrupt people will be punished in the High Court..."

ANI

84,324 次观看 • 7 个月前

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi | Supreme Court stays the order of Delhi High Court, which suspended the life sentence of expelled Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case of a minor girl Mehmood Pracha, Advocate for Unnao rape case survivor, says, "I can assure the victims that we have got a small relief. This should not be called victory, but we have got a little time to breathe. CBI took a stand on a very limited point and did not raise our strongest grounds of argument. CBI did not consult us at all. There is so much evidence in favour of the victim that any court would give a verdict in her support... The court did not hear us on the main merits. CBI has just discussed the iceberg of the case; we have the entire matter with us... CBI did not make us a party in this case. We cannot treat this judgement as a victory for the victim..."

#WATCH | Delhi | Supreme Court stays the order of Delhi High Court, which suspended the life sentence of expelled Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case of a minor girl Mehmood Pracha, Advocate for Unnao rape case survivor, says, "I can assure the victims that we have got a small relief. This should not be called victory, but we have got a little time to breathe. CBI took a stand on a very limited point and did not raise our strongest grounds of argument. CBI did not consult us at all. There is so much evidence in favour of the victim that any court would give a verdict in her support... The court did not hear us on the main merits. CBI has just discussed the iceberg of the case; we have the entire matter with us... CBI did not make us a party in this case. We cannot treat this judgement as a victory for the victim..."

ANI

72,576 次观看 • 9 个月前

Shocking Reality of Justice Swarnkanta ‼️⚠️ Ishaan Sharma (son) completed his law degree in 2017 and began practicing the same year. Shortly after Justice Swarnkanta’s elevation to the High Court in 2022, he was empanelled on Central Government panels in 2023. Within just 5–6 years of his career, he was assigned 5,904 cases between 2023 and 2025, an extraordinarily high number that places him among the top ten counsels in terms of case allocations, out of nearly 700 panel counsels in the Supreme Court. In contrast, many others take years to reach such a position and may receive as little as a single case in an entire year. This also carries significant financial benefits. With a per-docket appearance fee of ₹9,000, the total earnings could exceed ₹5 crore in just two years, given the volume of cases assigned. Additionally, after Justice Swarnkanta became a High Court judge, her daughter was also empanelled on the Central Government panel. SG, Tushar Mehta, is assigning cases to both the son and daughter of Justice Swarnkanta, while also appearing in matters against Kejriwal ji. This raises serious concerns about fairness and the perception of justice and How can justice be served in these circumstances.

Shocking Reality of Justice Swarnkanta ‼️⚠️ Ishaan Sharma (son) completed his law degree in 2017 and began practicing the same year. Shortly after Justice Swarnkanta’s elevation to the High Court in 2022, he was empanelled on Central Government panels in 2023. Within just 5–6 years of his career, he was assigned 5,904 cases between 2023 and 2025, an extraordinarily high number that places him among the top ten counsels in terms of case allocations, out of nearly 700 panel counsels in the Supreme Court. In contrast, many others take years to reach such a position and may receive as little as a single case in an entire year. This also carries significant financial benefits. With a per-docket appearance fee of ₹9,000, the total earnings could exceed ₹5 crore in just two years, given the volume of cases assigned. Additionally, after Justice Swarnkanta became a High Court judge, her daughter was also empanelled on the Central Government panel. SG, Tushar Mehta, is assigning cases to both the son and daughter of Justice Swarnkanta, while also appearing in matters against Kejriwal ji. This raises serious concerns about fairness and the perception of justice and How can justice be served in these circumstances.

Eeshna

116,907 次观看 • 5 个月前

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,542 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.

ರವಿ ಕೀರ್ತಿ ಗೌಡ

16,456 次观看 • 1 个月前

Corruption is the problem. Transparency is the cure. In South Carolina, lawyer-legislators are hand-picking the very judges they appear before in court. That is not justice. That is a conflict of interest, and it has gone on long enough. Not on my watch.

Corruption is the problem. Transparency is the cure. In South Carolina, lawyer-legislators are hand-picking the very judges they appear before in court. That is not justice. That is a conflict of interest, and it has gone on long enough. Not on my watch.

Nancy Mace

12,380 次观看 • 5 个月前

VIDEO | "I have come to know via social media that raids are underway on hideouts of MRS. The CBI should have done this earlier when we are fighting against the sand mafia. Our party had held a dozen of rallies against the sand mafia. That time the government had said that it would recommend a CBI probe... Several big politicians are involved in this. This is a Rs 1 lakh crore scam," says Rashtriya Loktantrik Party chief Hanuman Beniwal (HANUMAN BENIWAL) on CBI raids in Rajasthan over illegal sand mining case. (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | "I have come to know via social media that raids are underway on hideouts of MRS. The CBI should have done this earlier when we are fighting against the sand mafia. Our party had held a dozen of rallies against the sand mafia. That time the government had said that it would recommend a CBI probe... Several big politicians are involved in this. This is a Rs 1 lakh crore scam," says Rashtriya Loktantrik Party chief Hanuman Beniwal (HANUMAN BENIWAL) on CBI raids in Rajasthan over illegal sand mining case. (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

18,948 次观看 • 2 年前

VIDEO | "I want to say that who are the ones who are putting Bengal on fire? Bengal police are bleeding. Who are people on the other side, it is the BJP people. What are you doing? CBI is now investigating, CBI is under you, you should let the investigation happen on fast-track, and hang the culprit, but you would not do it, because you have to do politics. They are putting Bengal on fire. It is the fire that is ignited by the BJP. They are not worried about providing justice, otherwise Manipur is burning for last one year," says All India Mahila Congress President Alka Lamba (Alka Lamba 🇮🇳) accusing the BJP for situation in Bengal after the rape and murder of a doctor in Kolkata. #RGKarMedicalCollegeHospital #kolkataprotests

VIDEO | "I want to say that who are the ones who are putting Bengal on fire? Bengal police are bleeding. Who are people on the other side, it is the BJP people. What are you doing? CBI is now investigating, CBI is under you, you should let the investigation happen on fast-track, and hang the culprit, but you would not do it, because you have to do politics. They are putting Bengal on fire. It is the fire that is ignited by the BJP. They are not worried about providing justice, otherwise Manipur is burning for last one year," says All India Mahila Congress President Alka Lamba (Alka Lamba 🇮🇳) accusing the BJP for situation in Bengal after the rape and murder of a doctor in Kolkata. #RGKarMedicalCollegeHospital #kolkataprotests

Press Trust of India

95,069 次观看 • 2 年前

#WATCH | Delhi: BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj says, "PM Narendra Modi is a leader who considers the youth of this country to be the builders of the nation... Our top priority is to protect the future of children. This exam (NEET) was scheduled for May 3rd. On May 11th, it emerged that the exam had been compromised in some way... On the same day, the Ministry of Education lodged an FIR, and immediately, without any delay and with transparency, its investigation was handed over to the CBI. The CBI formed an SIT and arrested 13 accused. They are still in custody. I want to assure you that the Modi government, adopting a very responsible attitude, has also requested the court that its trial should be heard on a day-to-day basis, the accused should be given the harshest punishment, and the punishment should be given as soon as possible so that the students get justice."

#WATCH | Delhi: BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj says, "PM Narendra Modi is a leader who considers the youth of this country to be the builders of the nation... Our top priority is to protect the future of children. This exam (NEET) was scheduled for May 3rd. On May 11th, it emerged that the exam had been compromised in some way... On the same day, the Ministry of Education lodged an FIR, and immediately, without any delay and with transparency, its investigation was handed over to the CBI. The CBI formed an SIT and arrested 13 accused. They are still in custody. I want to assure you that the Modi government, adopting a very responsible attitude, has also requested the court that its trial should be heard on a day-to-day basis, the accused should be given the harshest punishment, and the punishment should be given as soon as possible so that the students get justice."

ANI

81,947 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On Aaditya Thackeray and others named in CBI FIR in Disha Salian death case, Union Minister Ramdas Athawale says, "...Her father had filed a writ petition before the High Court. The Court ordered a CBI inquiry. I do not want to make any accusations but names of those who are linked to the case, this being a murder case and not a suicide case, will come out in CBI inquiry. Action should be taken against whoever is responsible for this murder..."

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On Aaditya Thackeray and others named in CBI FIR in Disha Salian death case, Union Minister Ramdas Athawale says, "...Her father had filed a writ petition before the High Court. The Court ordered a CBI inquiry. I do not want to make any accusations but names of those who are linked to the case, this being a murder case and not a suicide case, will come out in CBI inquiry. Action should be taken against whoever is responsible for this murder..."

ANI

14,448 次观看 • 11 天前

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

1,005,824 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."

ANI

55,478 次观看 • 1 个月前

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 次观看 • 11 个月前

#WATCH | Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI investigation into RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder incident. Advocate Billwadal Bhattacharyya says, "...There were statements made by the Chief Minister that they have no objection in transferring the case to the CBI but it was made time bound that after expiry of this particular period of time, we will transfer it to the CBI. But we say that this delay will be very fatal because evidence will be destroyed. So the court has heard the arguments of the parties. Today the parents of the victim girl, they also were there before the Court by way of a petition. And I contended on behalf of my clients, that despite this gruesome murder, despite the body being in such a bloodied state and half naked, the police was casual enough to register a suicide case and it took quite a lot of time for the police to basically register an FIR and thereafter arrest someone. So this was enough to indicate how casual the attitude of the police was. We are rather thankful and grateful to the Court that the case has been now handed over to CBI. We also wanted the investigation to be monitored by the Court. Now the Court has also directed the CBI to file periodic reports. In the event the parents of the deceased girl feel threatened, the CBI should always take all the necessary steps to give them protection under the witness protection scheme."

#WATCH | Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI investigation into RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder incident. Advocate Billwadal Bhattacharyya says, "...There were statements made by the Chief Minister that they have no objection in transferring the case to the CBI but it was made time bound that after expiry of this particular period of time, we will transfer it to the CBI. But we say that this delay will be very fatal because evidence will be destroyed. So the court has heard the arguments of the parties. Today the parents of the victim girl, they also were there before the Court by way of a petition. And I contended on behalf of my clients, that despite this gruesome murder, despite the body being in such a bloodied state and half naked, the police was casual enough to register a suicide case and it took quite a lot of time for the police to basically register an FIR and thereafter arrest someone. So this was enough to indicate how casual the attitude of the police was. We are rather thankful and grateful to the Court that the case has been now handed over to CBI. We also wanted the investigation to be monitored by the Court. Now the Court has also directed the CBI to file periodic reports. In the event the parents of the deceased girl feel threatened, the CBI should always take all the necessary steps to give them protection under the witness protection scheme."

ANI

36,332 次观看 • 2 年前

#WATCH | Delhi: RG Kar Medical College rape and murder victim's parents arrive in Delhi to meet the CBI Director. Her father says, "7 months have passed by. There is no sign of justice till now. We have come here to meet the CBI director and our Supreme Court lawyer. We were begging for justice, but now we are fighting for it... We have also sent an email to the Prime Minister and soon we will make it public. We want people to know how the taxpayers' money is being misused... Two other accused have been granted bail. The CBI has said in court that they will not file a chargesheet... We never wanted CBI to take over, but the court assigned the case to them... We have not even received the death certificate because there are many discrepancies in the documents."

#WATCH | Delhi: RG Kar Medical College rape and murder victim's parents arrive in Delhi to meet the CBI Director. Her father says, "7 months have passed by. There is no sign of justice till now. We have come here to meet the CBI director and our Supreme Court lawyer. We were begging for justice, but now we are fighting for it... We have also sent an email to the Prime Minister and soon we will make it public. We want people to know how the taxpayers' money is being misused... Two other accused have been granted bail. The CBI has said in court that they will not file a chargesheet... We never wanted CBI to take over, but the court assigned the case to them... We have not even received the death certificate because there are many discrepancies in the documents."

ANI

80,480 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra | On Bombay HC directs CBI to register FIR in Disha Salian death case, BJP leader Ram Kadam says, "The judiciary has finally delivered justice to Disha Salian's family. Justice may be delayed, but it is never denied. Disha Salian's father himself maintains that his daughter did not simply die; she was murdered—subjected to harassment, persecution, and atrocities—and the Uddhav Thackeray government of that time committed the wrongful act of hushing up the case to shield a prominent leader... Now, a formal case must be registered, and the matter handed over to the CBI. In this manner, the judiciary has granted justice to Disha's father..." (Self-made video)

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra | On Bombay HC directs CBI to register FIR in Disha Salian death case, BJP leader Ram Kadam says, "The judiciary has finally delivered justice to Disha Salian's family. Justice may be delayed, but it is never denied. Disha Salian's father himself maintains that his daughter did not simply die; she was murdered—subjected to harassment, persecution, and atrocities—and the Uddhav Thackeray government of that time committed the wrongful act of hushing up the case to shield a prominent leader... Now, a formal case must be registered, and the matter handed over to the CBI. In this manner, the judiciary has granted justice to Disha's father..." (Self-made video)

ANI

25,664 次观看 • 25 天前