CBS host: “We are hearing now that one hold out had reasonable doubt. With that information, will you file a motion barring another trial?” [regarding the Lindsay Clancy trial] Reddington replied: “Yeah, and we’re going to be arguing it in front of Judge a Sullivan in the 29th.”

Im trippin out.

Yeah I saw that too. 😬

@TheDagumTruth Good luck to the defense if they want to block a retrial. If I were prosecution I’d be getting legal aides scouring all this evidence & ensuring it is true to support the first jury was a hot mess.

@TheLinzerShow The appropriate action would be to cast doubt on absolutely everything. That...is how the Defense team is supposed to do their job. Reddington chastising @NancyGrace for ensuring the public/society stays victim-focused, shouldve caused much more alarming than it did.

@TheLinzerShow @NancyGrace @FaithMother395 😄😄😄😄😄 I have no idea what I read when I wrote that. ☝🏾☝🏿

Reasonable doubt on if the psychiatric medication impacted her, but not reasonable doubt on if she knowingly and premeditated murder.

How about those loony juror nurses using their "expertise" to nurse-splain.... They weren't suppose to do that. The judge better not give this jackass lawyer any leeway!

Sounds like they wanted him to have reasonable doubt so bad they narrated that he did to push this bs. I have a deep feeling this entire trial was a scam and someone is paying people back door ways to make a certain choice

His word against theirs. Is the jury room recorded, no! So what he actually said may very well been misinterpreted by the rest. Can't prove it. He said, she said, they said.

Laughable. The jurors and this lawyer intimidated the “lone juror” insisting that he listen to nurses (on the jury) and demanding that his reasoning align with theirs. Outrageous and uninformed.

How can there be double jeopardy when she hasn't been found not guilty. They are trying her on the same charges after mistrial no final verdict or acquittal was reached This guy thinks he can change the law as he goes along

Ok, then the prosecution can bring in the interviews of 3 jurors and one alleged juror where they state: - Nurses spoke on dosages & effects to persuade other jurors - There were dominant personalities (bullying) - Some voted on consequences & snapping (not insanity)

“Reasonable doubt” does NOT mean “without doubt”

The note did not say reasonable.

Well, I read that some of the weaker women on that jury STILL thought Clancy was GUILTY, but caved to the pressure from bitch RNS who ACTUALLY broke the law by providing "professional services" and interpreting the toxicology reports so that their bullying sounded better

"Reasonable doubt" and "beyond reasonable doubt" are confusing terms. Reasonable doubt as to what; that she did or didn't murder, or was or wasn't insane? Why won't anybody finish the sentence? Oh wait...we know why; to create "reasonable doubt" about the opposing juror.

Thought the juror note reported he had doubt; not reasonable doubt. Not that the average juror would even understand the difference in a case like this. Suffice it to say that lone juror operated on common sense. That part of this case is really not that difficult

Help me understand, what does he want out of this trial. His argument was bigpharma is why she killed the kids. Now, he is fighting to avoid prison and go to a hospital to take more meds...🤦🏽. Does his client want to choke nurses and doctors next..

But he had reasonable doubt against her claims of insanity not for her innocence

There will be another trial guaranteed.

The next trial will be a 2nd degree murder charge and a bench trial with no jury. Massachusetts is a feminist shit hole.

Beyond a reasonable doubt Beyond Beyond

Prosecution was absolute dog shit allowing a Jury member who is a advocate to free Karen Read like holy shit how fuckin bad you got to be at your job to allow that type of Juror to pass through

"guilty BEYOND a reasonable doubt" They are missing the beyond out!!!

We are hearing other things that disqualify the three attention seeking jurors

Another one thinks so is still but the nurses kept pushing a narrative. Hopefully prosecution brings this up.

“She was a good mother” is not reasonable doubt.

Now this whinny b!tch is doing the media tour. Disgusting slime ball! Hope he rots in hell with the monster he’s defending. All for fame and money. Shameless. Never forget who the REAL victims are!!!

He is dumb. There was a mistrial you cannot have the case dismissed.

Is hearsay from a juror allowed?

He didn't say "reasonable doubt" he said some doubt and the judge told them reasonable doubt does not mean no doubt.

them liberal bitches in the jury didn't take this deliberation seriously at all they wanted non guilty from. Opening statements from prosecution saying they had no sympathy for Lindsay wtf

Everyone should watch the movie Runaway Jury. Jury tampering is a thing.

Every 1 of those 3 jurors would kill and not blink twice. Another 8 would watch it happen and say it was none of their buisness. But that 1 oh that glorious 1 would drop a killer and sleep soundly.

BEYOND reasonable doubt

Disgraceful

CBS is about to get sued - “we are now hearing… “ without transcripts of proof and using opinionated comments as fact?? This is not journalism - this is gossip

Such bullshit these hags basically bullied other jurors