Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

CENTCOM confirmed it mid-interview: two U.S. service members killed in Jordan, one missing, four medevaced. Trump's own stated red line, crossed on the record. Professor Marandi's answer was that the number is higher than that and it doesn't matter anyway. American lives aren't holy to Iranians, he said, and...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,759,335 subscribers

505,868 просмотров • 20 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

#Watch | U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking in a video message he posted on social media, said the U.S. would “avenge” the deaths of the service members and that “there will likely be more” killed before the conflict ends. He called the three service members “true American patriots who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, even as we continue the righteous mission for which they gave their lives.” He added, “Sadly, there will likely be more, before it ends. That's the way it is. Likely be more.” 🎥PTI
0:47

#Watch | U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking in a video message he posted on social media, said the U.S. would “avenge” the deaths of the service members and that “there will likely be more” killed before the conflict ends. He called the three service members “true American patriots who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, even as we continue the righteous mission for which they gave their lives.” He added, “Sadly, there will likely be more, before it ends. That's the way it is. Likely be more.” 🎥PTI

The Hindu

29,015 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

STEPHEN A. SMITH: “I absolutely would have stood up… because you got to remember the key words that came out of [Trump’s] mouth. He said American citizens.” “First of all, that’s the right thing because it should be American citizens first—number one.” “And number two, for people on the left… coming out and saying that what he said was racist. Well, how exactly?” “When people are coming into this country undocumented, and they’re crossing our borders illegally, it costs us money.” “So anything that works to the detriment of our country (like illegal immigration) is going to work doubly worse for the black community. And I look at it from that standpoint.”
2:14

STEPHEN A. SMITH: “I absolutely would have stood up… because you got to remember the key words that came out of [Trump’s] mouth. He said American citizens.” “First of all, that’s the right thing because it should be American citizens first—number one.” “And number two, for people on the left… coming out and saying that what he said was racist. Well, how exactly?” “When people are coming into this country undocumented, and they’re crossing our borders illegally, it costs us money.” “So anything that works to the detriment of our country (like illegal immigration) is going to work doubly worse for the black community. And I look at it from that standpoint.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

419,146 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Did Iranian strikes on U.S. forces in the region force Trump to back off? Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi says the Iranians were simply defending themselves. There was no real ceasefire. The Americans started the war, he says, imposed siege conditions and ignored the earlier memorandum of understanding from day one. When Iranian forces saw the U.S. building up in Jordan and Kuwait, they struck. Marandi frames it as a clear message: Iran does not operate on Washington’s timetable and will hit back whenever it deems necessary. That display of confidence, he believes, helped convince Trump not to restart the full war. Seyed Mohammad Marandi
2:03

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Did Iranian strikes on U.S. forces in the region force Trump to back off? Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi says the Iranians were simply defending themselves. There was no real ceasefire. The Americans started the war, he says, imposed siege conditions and ignored the earlier memorandum of understanding from day one. When Iranian forces saw the U.S. building up in Jordan and Kuwait, they struck. Marandi frames it as a clear message: Iran does not operate on Washington’s timetable and will hit back whenever it deems necessary. That display of confidence, he believes, helped convince Trump not to restart the full war. Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

116,132 просмотров • 2 дней назад

NEW: Tech billionaire and lifelong Democrat Mark Pincus reveals his "Red Pill" moment, sparked by Mike Solana's Pirate Wires and the "very fine people" hoax, culminating in him voting for Donald Trump. "I started reading Pirate Wires and Mike Solana, and I thought he was a little crazy at first because he would write these articles, and one he wrote was about how the Ukrainian soldiers had swastikas on their helmets, and the NYT photographers would ask them to take the swastikas off for photos." "I said that can't be true, and then four months later, it was in the NYT buried in the middle of the paper, and I kept seeing stories like that that he would be early on. So, I started feeling more uncomfortable and queasy with what was going on with mainstream media." "Then, in May 2024, I read an article that talked about Trump's speech in Charlottesville, where he said there are good people on both sides, and the article said it was completely propaganda and didn't actually reflect what he said. That he denounced the Nazis a bunch of times in his speech, so then I went and watched that video, and that was my red pill moment." "I think it was for a lot of people because it wasn't just the media or politicians spinning it. That speech was one of the pillars of why you were supposed to hate Trump. Then you see Biden say that's why he had to run a second time, and Obama says it, and Biden brings it up again at the DNC." "They clearly know they are misrepresenting things, so for me, that was beyond uncomfortable. Now, I have to go back to first principles and look at the primary data, listen to only original speeches by people, and I just realized I couldn't trust the mainstream media." What was your Red Pill moment? Drop your story in the comments.👇
4:45

NEW: Tech billionaire and lifelong Democrat Mark Pincus reveals his "Red Pill" moment, sparked by Mike Solana's Pirate Wires and the "very fine people" hoax, culminating in him voting for Donald Trump. "I started reading Pirate Wires and Mike Solana, and I thought he was a little crazy at first because he would write these articles, and one he wrote was about how the Ukrainian soldiers had swastikas on their helmets, and the NYT photographers would ask them to take the swastikas off for photos." "I said that can't be true, and then four months later, it was in the NYT buried in the middle of the paper, and I kept seeing stories like that that he would be early on. So, I started feeling more uncomfortable and queasy with what was going on with mainstream media." "Then, in May 2024, I read an article that talked about Trump's speech in Charlottesville, where he said there are good people on both sides, and the article said it was completely propaganda and didn't actually reflect what he said. That he denounced the Nazis a bunch of times in his speech, so then I went and watched that video, and that was my red pill moment." "I think it was for a lot of people because it wasn't just the media or politicians spinning it. That speech was one of the pillars of why you were supposed to hate Trump. Then you see Biden say that's why he had to run a second time, and Obama says it, and Biden brings it up again at the DNC." "They clearly know they are misrepresenting things, so for me, that was beyond uncomfortable. Now, I have to go back to first principles and look at the primary data, listen to only original speeches by people, and I just realized I couldn't trust the mainstream media." What was your Red Pill moment? Drop your story in the comments.👇

KanekoaTheGreat

47,358,984 просмотров • 1 год назад

Walton Goggins tells Tarantino he's not leaving the audition room — 'Getting the job is irrelevant to me' “I said: I'm not leaving. He said: what do you mean? I said: I want to read all of these roles. He said: what are you talking about? I said: getting the job is irrelevant to me.” “Quentin read every other role as if he was filming it. And then I read Leo's role and he read every other role as if we were filming it — and it was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist.” “A couple of months go by — and I get a call that he wants me to come and play with him. And that was the beginning of two of the greatest experiences of my life.”
1:50

Walton Goggins tells Tarantino he's not leaving the audition room — 'Getting the job is irrelevant to me' “I said: I'm not leaving. He said: what do you mean? I said: I want to read all of these roles. He said: what are you talking about? I said: getting the job is irrelevant to me.” “Quentin read every other role as if he was filming it. And then I read Leo's role and he read every other role as if we were filming it — and it was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist.” “A couple of months go by — and I get a call that he wants me to come and play with him. And that was the beginning of two of the greatest experiences of my life.”

ramagazzi

2,687,033 просмотров • 25 дней назад

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi highlighted that the supposed one-page agreement Axios shared a few days ago was "complete nonsense", asserting that it was meant for market manipulation. "But the Iranians said that there is no such document and there is no such agreement," he emphasized. Professor Marandi also stressed that the Iranians are not going to give up their peaceful nuclear program, adding, "They're not going to give Trump a deal better than that of Obama." He added that at the moment, Iran's priority is not the nuclear program, it is peace. "And so the discussions on the nuclear program will be left for a later date. That's what the Iranians have told the Americans. And for the Iranians right now, the priority is to have a ceasefire in Lebanon and, of course, in Palestine, but also to end the siege," Professor Marandi said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #AlMayadeen #IranWar #WestAsia #Iran #US
3:08

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi highlighted that the supposed one-page agreement Axios shared a few days ago was "complete nonsense", asserting that it was meant for market manipulation. "But the Iranians said that there is no such document and there is no such agreement," he emphasized. Professor Marandi also stressed that the Iranians are not going to give up their peaceful nuclear program, adding, "They're not going to give Trump a deal better than that of Obama." He added that at the moment, Iran's priority is not the nuclear program, it is peace. "And so the discussions on the nuclear program will be left for a later date. That's what the Iranians have told the Americans. And for the Iranians right now, the priority is to have a ceasefire in Lebanon and, of course, in Palestine, but also to end the siege," Professor Marandi said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #AlMayadeen #IranWar #WestAsia #Iran #US

Al Mayadeen English

22,480 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Speaking to Al Mayadeen on Monday, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that Yemen has the ability to inflict “far greater damage” on Saudi Arabia than Riyadh can inflict on Yemen. He explained that Saudi Arabia has major and costly infrastructure, including oil facilities, whose destruction or damage would severely impact its economy. Yemen, however, “because of years of siege and because of the genocidal war,” does not have similarly expensive infrastructure that could be targeted. Regarding Iran’s position, Professor Marandi stressed that Tehran has consistently encouraged Saudi Arabia to pursue rapprochement with Yemen. “For Iran, it is very upsetting that one of its civilian airliners when it's about to land would be threatened by the Saudis in this way. This is a dangerous move, and it angers Iranians immensely,” he said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #WestAsia #Iran #SaudiArabia #Yemen #AlMayadeen
2:22

Speaking to Al Mayadeen on Monday, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that Yemen has the ability to inflict “far greater damage” on Saudi Arabia than Riyadh can inflict on Yemen. He explained that Saudi Arabia has major and costly infrastructure, including oil facilities, whose destruction or damage would severely impact its economy. Yemen, however, “because of years of siege and because of the genocidal war,” does not have similarly expensive infrastructure that could be targeted. Regarding Iran’s position, Professor Marandi stressed that Tehran has consistently encouraged Saudi Arabia to pursue rapprochement with Yemen. “For Iran, it is very upsetting that one of its civilian airliners when it's about to land would be threatened by the Saudis in this way. This is a dangerous move, and it angers Iranians immensely,” he said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #WestAsia #Iran #SaudiArabia #Yemen #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

14,608 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Gene Kelly screened "The Red Shoes" (1948) at least fifteen to twenty times to different executives at MGM to persuade them to accept the script for Vincent Minnelli's "An American in Paris" (1951). He was told by the executives that the success of "The Red Shoes" was mainly due to the lead actress being foreign & if it were an American actress in that part, the movie would have bombed. Here is Michael Powell talking about it: "The American distributors put our films on their shelves, saying they were too British: a calculated insult, difficult to refute, because they were British. That was the point of a picture like 'The Red Shoes' (1948). It could never have been made in Hollywood in 1947. Hollywood had made films about art and life and love, but I can't remember a single one, and I have total recall. Gene Kelly told me that he ran 'The Red Shoes' fifteen to twenty times for different executives at MGM before he got acceptance of his script for Vincente Minnelli's 'American in Paris', and then it was mainly because he had a foreign ballerina for the part- Leslie Caron. He was told that the success of 'The Red Shoes' was due to the girl being foreign. An American girl in the same part would have bombed. He didn't argue, but took the money and Leslie Caron and ran. The film was a huge success. I never saw it, but Gene told me that it was full of quotes from 'The Red Shoes'. Art! But it had Gene Kelly." ("A Life in Movies", Michael Powell, 1986) P.S: On this day, 78 years ago, "The Red Shoes" (1948) premiered in London, UK.
1:47

Gene Kelly screened "The Red Shoes" (1948) at least fifteen to twenty times to different executives at MGM to persuade them to accept the script for Vincent Minnelli's "An American in Paris" (1951). He was told by the executives that the success of "The Red Shoes" was mainly due to the lead actress being foreign & if it were an American actress in that part, the movie would have bombed. Here is Michael Powell talking about it: "The American distributors put our films on their shelves, saying they were too British: a calculated insult, difficult to refute, because they were British. That was the point of a picture like 'The Red Shoes' (1948). It could never have been made in Hollywood in 1947. Hollywood had made films about art and life and love, but I can't remember a single one, and I have total recall. Gene Kelly told me that he ran 'The Red Shoes' fifteen to twenty times for different executives at MGM before he got acceptance of his script for Vincente Minnelli's 'American in Paris', and then it was mainly because he had a foreign ballerina for the part- Leslie Caron. He was told that the success of 'The Red Shoes' was due to the girl being foreign. An American girl in the same part would have bombed. He didn't argue, but took the money and Leslie Caron and ran. The film was a huge success. I never saw it, but Gene told me that it was full of quotes from 'The Red Shoes'. Art! But it had Gene Kelly." ("A Life in Movies", Michael Powell, 1986) P.S: On this day, 78 years ago, "The Red Shoes" (1948) premiered in London, UK.

DepressedBergman

26,181 просмотров • 16 дней назад

I just called the number on the sign and was told by the first person that spoke with me that the homes were being sold to the public but you had to be Sikh to buy them. The second person, likely Manheet Singh of Juno Homes, was quick to correct the record and said the homes were open to anyone. He said the sign called it a “Sikh community” because it included a temple, and that there was a misunderstanding. I told him if a community with a Christian church in the center advertised itself as a “Christian community” it would skirt the line (and likely violate the Fair Housing Act). He argued Mormons build communities and prefer their own religion but allow others, and that the Sikh community is about believing in one God and is open to all. Under normal circumstances I would have identified myself as a member of the media but I called anonymously to ensure I received more honest answers. It was announced on the line before I started recording.
3:41

I just called the number on the sign and was told by the first person that spoke with me that the homes were being sold to the public but you had to be Sikh to buy them. The second person, likely Manheet Singh of Juno Homes, was quick to correct the record and said the homes were open to anyone. He said the sign called it a “Sikh community” because it included a temple, and that there was a misunderstanding. I told him if a community with a Christian church in the center advertised itself as a “Christian community” it would skirt the line (and likely violate the Fair Housing Act). He argued Mormons build communities and prefer their own religion but allow others, and that the Sikh community is about believing in one God and is open to all. Under normal circumstances I would have identified myself as a member of the media but I called anonymously to ensure I received more honest answers. It was announced on the line before I started recording.

Jacob Stewart

34,627 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Delhi excise policy matter | Delhi Minister Atishi says, "In the so-called excise policy scam of Delhi, CBI and ED investigations have been going on for the past two years. In these two years, a question has come up again and again - Where is the money trail? Where did the money go?...No proceeds of crime were recovered from any leader, minister or worker of AAP...Arvind Kejriwal was arrested in the same case two days back on the basis of the statement of just one person - Sharat Chandra Reddy. He is the owner of Aurobindo Pharma...He was summoned on 9th November 2022 for questioning. He clearly said that he never met or spoke with Arvind Kejriwal and has nothing to do with AAP. As soon as he said that, he was arrested the next day by the ED. After being in jail for several months, he changed his statement. He said that he met Arvind Kejriwal and spoke with him over the excise policy matter. He was granted bail as soon as he said that. But where is the money? Where is the money trail?"
3:55

#WATCH | Delhi excise policy matter | Delhi Minister Atishi says, "In the so-called excise policy scam of Delhi, CBI and ED investigations have been going on for the past two years. In these two years, a question has come up again and again - Where is the money trail? Where did the money go?...No proceeds of crime were recovered from any leader, minister or worker of AAP...Arvind Kejriwal was arrested in the same case two days back on the basis of the statement of just one person - Sharat Chandra Reddy. He is the owner of Aurobindo Pharma...He was summoned on 9th November 2022 for questioning. He clearly said that he never met or spoke with Arvind Kejriwal and has nothing to do with AAP. As soon as he said that, he was arrested the next day by the ED. After being in jail for several months, he changed his statement. He said that he met Arvind Kejriwal and spoke with him over the excise policy matter. He was granted bail as soon as he said that. But where is the money? Where is the money trail?"

ANI

944,478 просмотров • 2 лет назад

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he thinks the Iranians are going to expand the war, adding that it will be “a much more decisive war than last time” and “a much more destructive” one. He pointed out that the #US saying it is going to “wipe out a civilization” means that #Iran’s response will be “as hard as it can be” and that it will hit the most sensitive targets possible, “to make sure the pain among its enemies, whether in Tel Aviv or in the region or in Washington, is decisive.” Professor Marandi also noted that the world is moving closer “to an enormous economic crisis,” adding that it is currently in an unprecedented energy, fertilizer, and helium crisis, and that every day that goes by, it is only getting worse. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #IranWar #WarOnIran #EconomicCrisis
2:29

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he thinks the Iranians are going to expand the war, adding that it will be “a much more decisive war than last time” and “a much more destructive” one. He pointed out that the #US saying it is going to “wipe out a civilization” means that #Iran’s response will be “as hard as it can be” and that it will hit the most sensitive targets possible, “to make sure the pain among its enemies, whether in Tel Aviv or in the region or in Washington, is decisive.” Professor Marandi also noted that the world is moving closer “to an enormous economic crisis,” adding that it is currently in an unprecedented energy, fertilizer, and helium crisis, and that every day that goes by, it is only getting worse. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #IranWar #WarOnIran #EconomicCrisis

Al Mayadeen English

32,194 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi discusses Iran's diplomatic strategy, explaining that he thinks it is a "combination of things." Professor Marandi elaborated that, on the one hand, Iran is further strengthening its ties with friendly countries as seen in Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's diplomatic trip to Russia, Oman, and Pakistan. He added that the Iranians want the international community to see that Iran is open to negotiations and is not the party responsible for the current global economic crisis. "It wants to show the international community that Netanyahu and Trump are creating this global misery," he said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Russia #Oman #Pakistan #DonaldTrump
2:29

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi discusses Iran's diplomatic strategy, explaining that he thinks it is a "combination of things." Professor Marandi elaborated that, on the one hand, Iran is further strengthening its ties with friendly countries as seen in Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's diplomatic trip to Russia, Oman, and Pakistan. He added that the Iranians want the international community to see that Iran is open to negotiations and is not the party responsible for the current global economic crisis. "It wants to show the international community that Netanyahu and Trump are creating this global misery," he said. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Russia #Oman #Pakistan #DonaldTrump

Al Mayadeen English

11,339 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Gena Rowlands explains the reason why "A Woman Under the Influence" (1974, Cassavetes), which was first written as a play, was made into a movie: "Rowlands: John wrote it as a play. He said, “Hey, I wrote you a play.” And I said, “Great, let’s read it.” I read it and I said, “John, I couldn’t do this every night and twice on Wednesday and Saturday. I wouldn’t be able to last two weeks. I’d die.” It was a very hard play to do every night. And he said, “Don’t worry. Don’t even think about it, you’re right. I hadn’t thought of that.” He said, “Just forget it.” Then in about two weeks he said, “Okay. I solved the problem. I wrote a different play for you.” He said, “So you won’t have to carry all of it every night. I used the same characters but I enlarged different parts of the scenes.” He changed it generally to make it humanly possible. And I said, “Oh, that’s a miracle, let me see it.” And I read it and I said, “Listen, you must know a lot of strong actresses!” [laughs] I said, “I still wouldn’t be able to do it. This is really hard.” She has a nervous breakdown—there’s a lot of things that are hard emotionally to do. So he said, “Okay. I’m going to write it as a picture.” I said, “I think I can get through it once.” [laughs] “But I’m not making any guarantees.” He thought that was funny and then he wrote it thinking like an actor too instead of just a writer. I think he took that into consideration. And it is, of course, much easier to do a film when you’re doing an extremely emotional part than it is doing it onstage over and over especially. Interviewer: Do you consider that to be your most challenging role? Mabel? Rowlands: Well, yes, it was my favorite. I loved doing that. And it was challenging. Interviewer: Since John gave you so much freedom to do what you liked as a character, how would you go about finding them? Was it something that was instinctual for you, from the script? Rowlands: I read the script, you know, 50 times. And I thought about it. And then I did it. [laughs]" (Gena Rowlands' interview with Colleen Kelsey, Interview Magazine, 2016) P.S: Remembering the great American Actress Gena Rowlands on her 96th birthday!
1:27

Gena Rowlands explains the reason why "A Woman Under the Influence" (1974, Cassavetes), which was first written as a play, was made into a movie: "Rowlands: John wrote it as a play. He said, “Hey, I wrote you a play.” And I said, “Great, let’s read it.” I read it and I said, “John, I couldn’t do this every night and twice on Wednesday and Saturday. I wouldn’t be able to last two weeks. I’d die.” It was a very hard play to do every night. And he said, “Don’t worry. Don’t even think about it, you’re right. I hadn’t thought of that.” He said, “Just forget it.” Then in about two weeks he said, “Okay. I solved the problem. I wrote a different play for you.” He said, “So you won’t have to carry all of it every night. I used the same characters but I enlarged different parts of the scenes.” He changed it generally to make it humanly possible. And I said, “Oh, that’s a miracle, let me see it.” And I read it and I said, “Listen, you must know a lot of strong actresses!” [laughs] I said, “I still wouldn’t be able to do it. This is really hard.” She has a nervous breakdown—there’s a lot of things that are hard emotionally to do. So he said, “Okay. I’m going to write it as a picture.” I said, “I think I can get through it once.” [laughs] “But I’m not making any guarantees.” He thought that was funny and then he wrote it thinking like an actor too instead of just a writer. I think he took that into consideration. And it is, of course, much easier to do a film when you’re doing an extremely emotional part than it is doing it onstage over and over especially. Interviewer: Do you consider that to be your most challenging role? Mabel? Rowlands: Well, yes, it was my favorite. I loved doing that. And it was challenging. Interviewer: Since John gave you so much freedom to do what you liked as a character, how would you go about finding them? Was it something that was instinctual for you, from the script? Rowlands: I read the script, you know, 50 times. And I thought about it. And then I did it. [laughs]" (Gena Rowlands' interview with Colleen Kelsey, Interview Magazine, 2016) P.S: Remembering the great American Actress Gena Rowlands on her 96th birthday!

DepressedBergman

67,361 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jason Lee Reveals how Cardi B told him to immediately apologize after the misogynistic remarks he made about Ariana Grande that blew up the internet in 2019: "It was Cardi B who called and just said, like, nah, you crossed the line. You got to go back and fix that because you can't, that wasn't right. You're better than that. And so although nobody was around me at the time, I said it or edited it and it went out, you know, Cardi was able to check me to go back and fix it."
1:35

Jason Lee Reveals how Cardi B told him to immediately apologize after the misogynistic remarks he made about Ariana Grande that blew up the internet in 2019: "It was Cardi B who called and just said, like, nah, you crossed the line. You got to go back and fix that because you can't, that wasn't right. You're better than that. And so although nobody was around me at the time, I said it or edited it and it went out, you know, Cardi was able to check me to go back and fix it."

Red Media

306,708 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨ISRAELI TALKING POINTS HAVE BECOME AMERICAN🇺🇸 TALKING POINTS ON IRAN🇮🇷 ‘As the Trump administration got into the weeds, they got absolutely bamboozled, took Israeli talking points, turned them into American talking points… I get the sense that Netanyahu felt he was on the back foot…the President went to the region and he went to the Gulf and he went to where you are and two neighbouring states, Saudi and Qatar, and this is where he liked to be. And he didn’t go to Israel. And when he came away from the Gulf, he came away with his wallet stuffed. And he knows if he goes to Israel, he has to start pay, emptying his wallet, to put it bluntly. The Israelis didn’t like to be in that position, not because it was going to be massively necessarily used against them in the short term, but it is a change and I think Netanyahu thought he had to challenge that.’ -Daniel Levy, Former Senior Advisor to Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Ehud Barak, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
2:05

🚨ISRAELI TALKING POINTS HAVE BECOME AMERICAN🇺🇸 TALKING POINTS ON IRAN🇮🇷 ‘As the Trump administration got into the weeds, they got absolutely bamboozled, took Israeli talking points, turned them into American talking points… I get the sense that Netanyahu felt he was on the back foot…the President went to the region and he went to the Gulf and he went to where you are and two neighbouring states, Saudi and Qatar, and this is where he liked to be. And he didn’t go to Israel. And when he came away from the Gulf, he came away with his wallet stuffed. And he knows if he goes to Israel, he has to start pay, emptying his wallet, to put it bluntly. The Israelis didn’t like to be in that position, not because it was going to be massively necessarily used against them in the short term, but it is a change and I think Netanyahu thought he had to challenge that.’ -Daniel Levy, Former Senior Advisor to Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Ehud Barak, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

226,444 просмотров • 1 год назад

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."
4:24

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."

Ti Morse

47,497 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“It was an advanced intelligence.” “When he looked into its eyes, it read his mind.” This is the most well-documented UFO crash retrieval ever. And a neurosurgeon who came face to face with a being with “red eyes” just revealed his shocking story: In 1996, a UFO crashed in Varginha, Brazil. A being with red eyes and oily skin was spotted by three young girls—then it was captured by the military and taken to a local hospital run by Dr. Italo Venturelli. Jesse Michels: “You have a person whose credentials are unimpeachable. He runs a chain of hospitals.” “He works on people’s brains as a neurosurgeon.” “He’s a concert pianist.” “And because he’s had a couple of life-threatening illnesses, he comes out and speaks.” “What does he say about his interaction with the being?” James Fox: “The being was very calm.” “It had sort of acquiesced to being in captivity.” “It wasn’t suffering, it wasn’t in pain.” “And he said when he looked into the eyes of it, it read his mind.” “Like it could just read all of his thoughts.” “He’s like, ‘it was an advanced intelligence.’” “I kept saying, ‘what do you mean by that?’” “He goes, ‘there’s nothing here on Earth like it.’” “He called it like an angel.” “One of the last things he said was, ‘there’s so much to learn from the eyes of that being.’” “And you hear other cases in the wild where people talk about looking in the eyes of the creature.” “Ruwa, Zimbabwe.” “Socorro, New Mexico.” “I remember the wife of Lonnie Zamora looking at me and she goes, ‘I don’t know what happened when he looked at that creature, but he was never the same.’” “There’s some communication that occurs with the eyes.” Michels: “What did he say about the physical characteristics?” Fox: “Big head, almond-shaped eyes, they were red.” “The skin was more white than brown.” Jesse Michels James Fox
2:30

“It was an advanced intelligence.” “When he looked into its eyes, it read his mind.” This is the most well-documented UFO crash retrieval ever. And a neurosurgeon who came face to face with a being with “red eyes” just revealed his shocking story: In 1996, a UFO crashed in Varginha, Brazil. A being with red eyes and oily skin was spotted by three young girls—then it was captured by the military and taken to a local hospital run by Dr. Italo Venturelli. Jesse Michels: “You have a person whose credentials are unimpeachable. He runs a chain of hospitals.” “He works on people’s brains as a neurosurgeon.” “He’s a concert pianist.” “And because he’s had a couple of life-threatening illnesses, he comes out and speaks.” “What does he say about his interaction with the being?” James Fox: “The being was very calm.” “It had sort of acquiesced to being in captivity.” “It wasn’t suffering, it wasn’t in pain.” “And he said when he looked into the eyes of it, it read his mind.” “Like it could just read all of his thoughts.” “He’s like, ‘it was an advanced intelligence.’” “I kept saying, ‘what do you mean by that?’” “He goes, ‘there’s nothing here on Earth like it.’” “He called it like an angel.” “One of the last things he said was, ‘there’s so much to learn from the eyes of that being.’” “And you hear other cases in the wild where people talk about looking in the eyes of the creature.” “Ruwa, Zimbabwe.” “Socorro, New Mexico.” “I remember the wife of Lonnie Zamora looking at me and she goes, ‘I don’t know what happened when he looked at that creature, but he was never the same.’” “There’s some communication that occurs with the eyes.” Michels: “What did he say about the physical characteristics?” Fox: “Big head, almond-shaped eyes, they were red.” “The skin was more white than brown.” Jesse Michels James Fox

Holden Culotta

21,607 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

VIDEO | Actor Saif Ali Khan says producer Shah Rukh Khan gave the team of "Kartavya" a free hand to make the film the way they wanted. In fact, Shah Rukh was the one who called Saif to inform about the script that they were developing at Red Chillies. "He said, ‘There’s a lovely script, and I would like you to hear it, and do it’. Then I listened to it and met the director. Once the film was complete, he said, ‘It has come out as a lovely movie’. He was very happy,” Saif said. “Sometimes the presence (of Shah Rukh) can be overwhelming on sets and I think he understands that. He gave us room to make the film on our own. I felt I was working for his production with his kind of sensibility,” the actor added. Directed by Pulkit of "Bhakshak" fame, the film stars Rasika Dugal opposite Saif and the actor said he is a huge fan of the "Mirzapur" star. #ShahRukhKhan
1:03

VIDEO | Actor Saif Ali Khan says producer Shah Rukh Khan gave the team of "Kartavya" a free hand to make the film the way they wanted. In fact, Shah Rukh was the one who called Saif to inform about the script that they were developing at Red Chillies. "He said, ‘There’s a lovely script, and I would like you to hear it, and do it’. Then I listened to it and met the director. Once the film was complete, he said, ‘It has come out as a lovely movie’. He was very happy,” Saif said. “Sometimes the presence (of Shah Rukh) can be overwhelming on sets and I think he understands that. He gave us room to make the film on our own. I felt I was working for his production with his kind of sensibility,” the actor added. Directed by Pulkit of "Bhakshak" fame, the film stars Rasika Dugal opposite Saif and the actor said he is a huge fan of the "Mirzapur" star. #ShahRukhKhan

Press Trust of India

252,018 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад