正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan is spot on—the Second Amendment doesn’t stop at state lines. With over 22 million concealed carriers and 29 Constitutional Carry states, it’s time to pass Concealed Carry Reciprocity! 👏

124,020 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Chromium4500 的头像
Chromium45001 年前

@Jim_Jordan It's time to pass Constitutional Carry.

Mark G 的头像
Mark G1 年前

I hate to say it, GOA, but your compromise is showing. If you truly are a no compromise organization like you say, you would be backing the other bill that ensures 50 state constitutional carry, not some half-assed assistance for those in states where they either don't need a permit or the permits are easy to get. Those in the communist states get ZERO benefit from this unless they've already jumped through all of the hoops and paid the exorbitant fees to get a permit there. Presuming that's even possible, which I understand is often the case in some areas.

BlueMooGuns 的头像
BlueMooGuns1 年前

@Jim_Jordan We need to end these rogue states violating peoples rights.

Cascade Bear 的头像
Cascade Bear1 年前

@Jim_Jordan It's time to do away with all permit requirements.... PERIOD! @RepThomasMassie @Eric_Schmitt @HawleyMO @RandPaul

The Actual Bruno 的头像
The Actual Bruno1 年前

@Jim_Jordan How about they abolish all firearms laws because they are all unconstitutional?

JHeine 的头像
JHeine1 年前

@Jim_Jordan No license or fees in all 50 states. No magazines limits

KyleW.P.W. ✝️ 🇺🇸 的头像
KyleW.P.W. ✝️ 🇺🇸1 年前

@Jim_Jordan Doesn't matter when we still have to fill out federal permission slips.

Fang 的头像
Fang1 年前

@Jim_Jordan Amazing that we need new laws to make the 2A the 2A. Repeal the NFA, GCA and all other unconstitutional anti-American gun laws. Do away with all firearm or ammunition import restrictions. Stop taxing our God given rights!

Kmcf4419 的头像
Kmcf44191 年前

@Jim_Jordan Yes! It’s time to pass Concealed Carry Reciprocity!

NorCalPapa 的头像
NorCalPapa1 年前

@Jim_Jordan I’m old enough to remember gay and lesbian people traveling to the east coast (I believe it was Connecticut) to get married and the rest of the states had to acknowledge it.

相关视频

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 次观看 • 1 年前