Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔴Changing the constitution to remove or extend terms of office for the President is not in the national interest or good for the country as it only serves the interests of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and those around him, says Lovemore Madhuku, a professor of law. Zanu PF itself is...

NewsHawksLive's profile picture

TheNewsHawks

129,507 subscribers

43,546 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"...They don't vote at their gatherings, they just make noise, and the loudest noise is then taken as the resolution" Prof Lovemore Madhuku Prof Lovemore Madhuku BBC HARDtalk BBC News Africa ZANU PF Jamwanda
0:57

"...They don't vote at their gatherings, they just make noise, and the loudest noise is then taken as the resolution" Prof Lovemore Madhuku Prof Lovemore Madhuku BBC HARDtalk BBC News Africa ZANU PF Jamwanda

COZWVA

68,485 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🔴Lovemore Madhuku, a professor of law and constitutional law expert, says the proposed raft of amendments to the current constitution to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term to 2030 and the President's tenure from five to seven years is unacceptable. Source: Citizens Voice Network
59:27

🔴Lovemore Madhuku, a professor of law and constitutional law expert, says the proposed raft of amendments to the current constitution to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term to 2030 and the President's tenure from five to seven years is unacceptable. Source: Citizens Voice Network

TheNewsHawks

14,353 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

VIDEO | Vice-President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar (Vice-President of India) says, "President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This oath is taken only by President and her appointees, the Governors. Everyone, the Prime Minister, the Vice-President, the Ministers, the Parliamentarians, the judges, they take oath to abide by the Constitution. But to defend the Constitution, to preserve the Constitution, to protect the Constitution, that is the oath of the President of India, the supreme commander of the armed forces...There is a directive to the President by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for democracy for this day..." (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -
3:20

VIDEO | Vice-President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar (Vice-President of India) says, "President of India is a very elevated position. President takes oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This oath is taken only by President and her appointees, the Governors. Everyone, the Prime Minister, the Vice-President, the Ministers, the Parliamentarians, the judges, they take oath to abide by the Constitution. But to defend the Constitution, to preserve the Constitution, to protect the Constitution, that is the oath of the President of India, the supreme commander of the armed forces...There is a directive to the President by a recent judgement. Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone filing a review or not. We never bargained for democracy for this day..." (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

971,934 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mr Mnangagwa is Not the ONLY President in the World Prof Madhuku says Mnangagwa cannot claim that he wants to finish his projects because he's not the only person who can be president and anyone else can finish them. "The projects are not personal but national" "The issue of term limits is to deal with, and prmote governance" He dismissed this reasoning as "complete nonsense"
1:05

Mr Mnangagwa is Not the ONLY President in the World Prof Madhuku says Mnangagwa cannot claim that he wants to finish his projects because he's not the only person who can be president and anyone else can finish them. "The projects are not personal but national" "The issue of term limits is to deal with, and prmote governance" He dismissed this reasoning as "complete nonsense"

Change Radio

58,888 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

WAZADZAAA🔥: Defiant prominent opposition leader Professor Lovemore Madhuku addresses hundreds of party supporters who thronged his office in Harare, the same place where he was badly assaulted by police. He told his party supporters that they are against plans by Zanu PF and President Emmerson Mnangagwa to extend his term of office beyond 2028.
4:36

WAZADZAAA🔥: Defiant prominent opposition leader Professor Lovemore Madhuku addresses hundreds of party supporters who thronged his office in Harare, the same place where he was badly assaulted by police. He told his party supporters that they are against plans by Zanu PF and President Emmerson Mnangagwa to extend his term of office beyond 2028.

The Harare Times

20,092 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Professor Lovemore Madhuku in his Own Words Making the Case for Parliament to Indirectly Elect the President as an Electoral College: “We must not put in the Constitution of the country a provision that is dependant on what happens in a political party. That’s the point I’m making. We must never say in our Constitution of Zimbabwe that if a sitting President dies or resigns, we will wait to hear what the political party of that President is saying. No. That is not the best way of running a country. Political parties remain the preserve of those people who are in those political parties. But the country is run on the basis of either an election by the people—direct election—or you have Parliament as an institution sitting as an electoral college. Where parties have influence, they must do the influence within Parliament, but never to allow the political party to sit there to say I’m giving you this President, and so forth. That’s the point I’m making. And on that point, I’m making it right across the world; that’s what they do.” - Professor Madhuku, addressing a “Heal Zimbabwe Trust” public meeting in Harare on 22 February 2020. COMMENT: Professor Lovemore Madhuku’s 2020 remarks make a clear, powerful and enduring case for Clause 3 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B.I. Bill, 2026. This clause replaces the direct election of the President with an indirect election by Parliament sitting jointly as an electoral college; both after every general election and, when necessary, to fill any vacancy in the office of President. The current direct election of the President was first introduced in anticipation of a legislated one-party-one-man rule through Constitution Amendment No. 7, Act 1987 in the old Lancaster Constitution repealed in 2013. Professor Madhuku put it plainly: The Constitution should not—as it currently does— depend on the internal decisions of a political party to select a successor to the President of the country. When a sitting President dies, resigns or is removed, the nation should not have to wait and hear what that President’s political party “is saying.” That is not a constitutionally proper way to run a country. Political parties exist for their own members. The country, however, belongs to all Zimbabweans. The proper solution is straightforward: Parliament—the institution chosen by the people—should act as the electoral college. Inside that open forum, parties may exercise their influence transparently and accountably. No party should ever stand outside the Constitution and simply “give” the nation its next leader. This principle is not abstract. Worldwide, presidential by-elections to fill mid-term vacancies are extremely rare. Most stable presidential systems instead use automatic succession by a deputy or, increasingly, allow the legislature to elect a successor who serves out the remainder of the term. These arrangements place national continuity and stability above partisan interests. Clause 3 of the Bill follows exactly this proven path. By giving Parliament the clear duty to elect the President—whether at the start of a new term or in an unforeseen vacancy—Zimbabwe will secure stronger democratic stability, and keep the highest office firmly within the people’s constitutional framework rather than the private control of any single party. In short, Clause 3 is a mature, practical and principled reform that directly honours Professor Madhuku’s wise 2020 counsel. As such, it deserves the full support of every well-meaning Zimbabwean who values good governance, democratic constitutionalism, institutional integrity and the long-term strength of the country’s democracy in the national interest!
1:03

Professor Lovemore Madhuku in his Own Words Making the Case for Parliament to Indirectly Elect the President as an Electoral College: “We must not put in the Constitution of the country a provision that is dependant on what happens in a political party. That’s the point I’m making. We must never say in our Constitution of Zimbabwe that if a sitting President dies or resigns, we will wait to hear what the political party of that President is saying. No. That is not the best way of running a country. Political parties remain the preserve of those people who are in those political parties. But the country is run on the basis of either an election by the people—direct election—or you have Parliament as an institution sitting as an electoral college. Where parties have influence, they must do the influence within Parliament, but never to allow the political party to sit there to say I’m giving you this President, and so forth. That’s the point I’m making. And on that point, I’m making it right across the world; that’s what they do.” - Professor Madhuku, addressing a “Heal Zimbabwe Trust” public meeting in Harare on 22 February 2020. COMMENT: Professor Lovemore Madhuku’s 2020 remarks make a clear, powerful and enduring case for Clause 3 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B.I. Bill, 2026. This clause replaces the direct election of the President with an indirect election by Parliament sitting jointly as an electoral college; both after every general election and, when necessary, to fill any vacancy in the office of President. The current direct election of the President was first introduced in anticipation of a legislated one-party-one-man rule through Constitution Amendment No. 7, Act 1987 in the old Lancaster Constitution repealed in 2013. Professor Madhuku put it plainly: The Constitution should not—as it currently does— depend on the internal decisions of a political party to select a successor to the President of the country. When a sitting President dies, resigns or is removed, the nation should not have to wait and hear what that President’s political party “is saying.” That is not a constitutionally proper way to run a country. Political parties exist for their own members. The country, however, belongs to all Zimbabweans. The proper solution is straightforward: Parliament—the institution chosen by the people—should act as the electoral college. Inside that open forum, parties may exercise their influence transparently and accountably. No party should ever stand outside the Constitution and simply “give” the nation its next leader. This principle is not abstract. Worldwide, presidential by-elections to fill mid-term vacancies are extremely rare. Most stable presidential systems instead use automatic succession by a deputy or, increasingly, allow the legislature to elect a successor who serves out the remainder of the term. These arrangements place national continuity and stability above partisan interests. Clause 3 of the Bill follows exactly this proven path. By giving Parliament the clear duty to elect the President—whether at the start of a new term or in an unforeseen vacancy—Zimbabwe will secure stronger democratic stability, and keep the highest office firmly within the people’s constitutional framework rather than the private control of any single party. In short, Clause 3 is a mature, practical and principled reform that directly honours Professor Madhuku’s wise 2020 counsel. As such, it deserves the full support of every well-meaning Zimbabwean who values good governance, democratic constitutionalism, institutional integrity and the long-term strength of the country’s democracy in the national interest!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

88,259 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Chiedza Mlingwa says they will approach the courts as part of efforts to reverse the mutilation of the constitution by President Emmerson Mnangagwa following his signing of CAB3 into law Full video:
0:34

Chiedza Mlingwa says they will approach the courts as part of efforts to reverse the mutilation of the constitution by President Emmerson Mnangagwa following his signing of CAB3 into law Full video:

Open Parly ZW

18,072 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Boss Caro who is the National Chairperson of Hairdressers for ED: “As members of a Zanu PF affiliate group, we are happy with the progress our President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, is making. As Hairdressers for ED, we will support and add to the good work he is doing.” 🎥Newsday Zim
0:50

Boss Caro who is the National Chairperson of Hairdressers for ED: “As members of a Zanu PF affiliate group, we are happy with the progress our President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, is making. As Hairdressers for ED, we will support and add to the good work he is doing.” 🎥Newsday Zim

𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐖

11,911 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH | ZANU-PF spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa says President Emmerson Mnangagwa has done good work in turning around Zimbabwe's economy, adding that it is the democratic wish of ZANU-PF members for the 83-year-old leader to remain in power beyond 2028.
2:43

WATCH | ZANU-PF spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa says President Emmerson Mnangagwa has done good work in turning around Zimbabwe's economy, adding that it is the democratic wish of ZANU-PF members for the 83-year-old leader to remain in power beyond 2028.

SABC News

72,728 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

📹 Tendai Biti, one of the conveners of a movement to resist attempts to amend the constitution and extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term speaks outside SAPES Trust which was bombed overnight. “It’s a non-partisan, non-political effort to defend the constitution,” he says.
0:43

📹 Tendai Biti, one of the conveners of a movement to resist attempts to amend the constitution and extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term speaks outside SAPES Trust which was bombed overnight. “It’s a non-partisan, non-political effort to defend the constitution,” he says.

ZimLive

50,413 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

ZANU PF Mashonaland West Province has unanimously resolved to push for a constitutional amendment that would allow President Emmerson Mnangagwa to extend his tenure as President and First Secretary of the ruling party until 2030. ZANU PF Mashonaland West Secretary for Administration, Cde Misheck Nyarubero, confirmed the resolution.
1:03

ZANU PF Mashonaland West Province has unanimously resolved to push for a constitutional amendment that would allow President Emmerson Mnangagwa to extend his tenure as President and First Secretary of the ruling party until 2030. ZANU PF Mashonaland West Secretary for Administration, Cde Misheck Nyarubero, confirmed the resolution.

ZBC News Online

19,535 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”
1:13

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”

TheNewsHawks

16,586 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

(WATCH) Presidential spokesman Vincent Magwenya says President Cyril Ramaphosa went to Zimbabwe at the invitation of President Emmerson Mnangagwa over the weekend. He says the President is concerned & was unaware that one of Zim delegates is a person of interest in SA. #sabcnews
1:23

(WATCH) Presidential spokesman Vincent Magwenya says President Cyril Ramaphosa went to Zimbabwe at the invitation of President Emmerson Mnangagwa over the weekend. He says the President is concerned & was unaware that one of Zim delegates is a person of interest in SA. #sabcnews

Bulelani Phillip

741,839 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ZANU PF Director of Information and Publicity, Cde Farai Marapira, emphasized that ahead of the Party’s 22nd National People's Conference, Resolution Number 1, calling for His Excellency President Dr. E.D. Mnangagwa to extend his term until 2030, is an official Party position. He expressed confidence that the resolution will be implemented, highlighting that the President is a listening leader who has affirmed that the voice of the people is the voice of God. ___________ Distributed by ZANU PF Headquarters:: INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY DEPARTMENT Follow us: Website: Facebook: ZANU PF PARTY X: ZANU PF Tiktok: Instagram: Officialzanupf Telegram: zanupfofficial
1:20

ZANU PF Director of Information and Publicity, Cde Farai Marapira, emphasized that ahead of the Party’s 22nd National People's Conference, Resolution Number 1, calling for His Excellency President Dr. E.D. Mnangagwa to extend his term until 2030, is an official Party position. He expressed confidence that the resolution will be implemented, highlighting that the President is a listening leader who has affirmed that the voice of the people is the voice of God. ___________ Distributed by ZANU PF Headquarters:: INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY DEPARTMENT Follow us: Website: Facebook: ZANU PF PARTY X: ZANU PF Tiktok: Instagram: Officialzanupf Telegram: zanupfofficial

ZANU PF

31,603 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

All the OPPOSITION folks grumbling about Amendment No. 3 should watch this video. K, THIS👇🏽 is the day ZANU PF got a FREE TICKET to amend the Constitution. Chamisa made it clear that Parliament is not the CCC’s priority… ZANU PF made it a priority & won the right to amend the constitution… It will VERY FOOLISH for ZANU PF to not utilise that victory they worked hard for….. The opposition can cry all they want for a referendum, but ZANU PF owes them NOTHING…. If u lose the political game, u won’t use the back door at a later stage…. TENDAI BITI stood there and said NOTHING, but today he is pretending to “defend” the Constitution… he lost that right the day he agreed to Chamisa’s strategy
2:20

All the OPPOSITION folks grumbling about Amendment No. 3 should watch this video. K, THIS👇🏽 is the day ZANU PF got a FREE TICKET to amend the Constitution. Chamisa made it clear that Parliament is not the CCC’s priority… ZANU PF made it a priority & won the right to amend the constitution… It will VERY FOOLISH for ZANU PF to not utilise that victory they worked hard for….. The opposition can cry all they want for a referendum, but ZANU PF owes them NOTHING…. If u lose the political game, u won’t use the back door at a later stage…. TENDAI BITI stood there and said NOTHING, but today he is pretending to “defend” the Constitution… he lost that right the day he agreed to Chamisa’s strategy

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

26,732 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN
4:53

The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN

ARISE NEWS

70,396 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr