Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐Ÿ”ฅ Charisma on full blast โ€” ๐Œ๐ˆ๐๐‡๐Žโ€™s lighting up the stage with unstoppable energy, this stage was a full-course meal you didnโ€™t know you needed. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ Catch the real deal at ๐–๐€๐“๐„๐‘๐๐Ž๐Œ๐ ๐’๐ˆ๐๐†๐€๐๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ โ€” where the musicโ€™s wet, wild, and unforgettable. ๐ŸŒŠโœจ ๐ŸฉทTEAM PINK | 30.8 (SAT) ๐–๐€๐“๐„๐‘๐๐Ž๐Œ๐...

69,326 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von ๋ถˆ๊ฝƒ๊ฐ•์•„์ง€โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿถ.
๋ถˆ๊ฝƒ๊ฐ•์•„์ง€โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿถ.vor 1 Jahr

๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿ’™ #MINHO #๋ฏผํ˜ธ #CHOIMINHO #์ตœ๋ฏผํ˜ธ #SHINee #์ƒค์ด๋‹ˆ

Profilbild von Mobile Scanner
Mobile Scannervor 1 Jahr

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. ๐Ÿ‘

Profilbild von rahima แฅซแญก.
rahima แฅซแญก.vor 1 Jahr

YESSSSS MINHO

Profilbild von SHINee
SHINeevor 1 Jahr

#MINHO in SMTOWN LIVE 2025 @ LONDON #MINHO #๋ฏผํ˜ธ #SHINee #์ƒค์ด๋‹ˆ #SMTOWN #SM_30thAnniversary #SMTOWN2025 #SMTOWN2025_LONDON #SMTOWN_LIVE #SMCU

Profilbild von ๐‘†๐ป๐ผ๐‘๐‘’๐‘’_๐‘–๐‘ก๐ŸŒธ
๐‘†๐ป๐ผ๐‘๐‘’๐‘’_๐‘–๐‘ก๐ŸŒธvor 1 Jahr

20250629 ์Šด์ฝ˜ ๋Ÿฐ๋˜ ๋ฏผํ˜ธ full call back ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ Something About U #์ƒค์ด๋‹ˆ #SHINee #MINHO #ใƒŸใƒณใƒ›

Profilbild von ํƒœ๋ฏผโ™ฅ๋ฏผํ˜ธ_Taemin_Minho_2min_SHINee_5 (ZOL)
ํƒœ๋ฏผโ™ฅ๋ฏผํ˜ธ_Taemin_Minho_2min_SHINee_5 (ZOL)vor 1 Jahr

250628 Minho with Kai Morning Night #์ƒค์ด๋‹ˆ #SHINee #Minho #๋ฏผํ˜ธ #exo #Kai

Profilbild von ๐™ฒ๐š‘๐šŠ๐šŽ๐š›๐š’๐š— หถแต” แต• แต”หถ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿฏโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ’™๐ŸŒน
๐™ฒ๐š‘๐šŠ๐šŽ๐š›๐š’๐š— หถแต” แต• แต”หถ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿฏโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ’™๐ŸŒนvor 1 Jahr

I basically did a Minho fancam at the end there, as although I love many artists here today, our SHINee Minho is everything ๐Ÿฅบ๐Ÿ’• He's always so fun and playful - the actual heart of that company ๐Ÿฉต #SMTOWNINLONDON #SMTOWN_LIVE_LONDON #SMTOWNLONDON #SHINee #์ƒค์ด๋‹ˆ #๋ฏผํ˜ธ #Minho

ร„hnliche Videos

๐ŸšจSHOCKING: Jesse On Fire Just VALIDATED The PETN Shirt EXPLOSION Thesisโ€”The "LONE SHOOTER" Narrative Is Officially DEAD. ๐ŸŽค๐Ÿ’ฅ Jesse On Fire just dedicated a massive segment to covering our investigation into the explosive device hidden under Charlie Kirk's shirt. While Jesse and I fundamentally disagree on the ultimate conclusion (he believes Charlie is alive and in hiding; I am adamant that Charlie is dead), we are now 100% aligned on the mechanics of what actually happened on that stage. If you look at the footage Jesse broke down from our findings, the official "lone shooter from the Losee building with a 30-06" narrative is completely destroyed. Here is what everyone is finally waking up to: 1. THE COMPRESSED AIR & THE SHIRT PUFF If you watch the footage in slow motion, right before the chaos starts, there is a massive, unnatural puff of air that forcefully escapes from underneath Charlie's shirt collar and sleeve. A distant rifle round does not cause a localized, pressurized puff of air from underneath a garment before the impact is even visible. That is the unmistakable signature of energy being released from a small, localized detonationโ€”specifically, a micro-explosive device (like PETN) triggered from within his own equipment. 2. THE CORD AND THE CONTRAMPTION Jesse highlighted that there is a visible hose/wire running up Charlieโ€™s back, connecting directly to the area where the explosion occurs. The location of the blast lines exactly up with where his mic receiver was clipped onto his belt on his left side. 3. CANDACE'S DREAM AND "THE LEFT" This all ties back to the chilling detail Candace Owens revealed about her vivid dream. In the dream, Charlie told her: "They are hiding what happened to my left." What was on his left? The mic receiver. The exact location of the localized explosion that took his life. 4. THE SECURITY TEAM ANOMALIES Jesse pointed out the glaring anomalies with the security team that we have been screaming about for weeks: Why was the security team receiving signals right before it happened? Why did his Chief of Staff (Mikey McCoy) and others immediately walk away before the chaos even registered? Why was there a total lack of blood on the hands, clothes, and shoes of the security team who supposedly jumped on top of a man bleeding out from a catastrophic neck wound? THE BOTTOM LINE Whether you believe Charlie is alive (like Jesse) or dead (like me), the physical evidence on that stage proves one undeniable fact: Charlie Kirk was not shot by a distant sniper. using a 30.06 round. He was taken out by a localized explosive device planted in his own equipment, and the people closest to him knew it was coming. The entire federal narrative is a fabricated cover-up. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโš“๏ธ FOLLOW ๐Ÿ”ฅJesse ON FIRE๐Ÿ”ฅ and watch his FULL video below. ๐Ÿ‘‡

Project Constitution

32,087 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason โœจ๐Ÿ‘พSaaStr.Aiโœจ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't wantโ€”who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropicโ€™s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We needโ€”everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big eventโ€”they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may becomeโ€”so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any roleโ€”sales, marketing, engineering, product, QAโ€”they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and saysโ€”it's it's it sounds Captain Obviousโ€”but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AIโ€”you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these teamโ€”all the brute forcers out thereโ€”everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubledโ€”well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hireโ€”now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, thereโ€”now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This isโ€”you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give youโ€”want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell youโ€”pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGCโ€”I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. Aโ€”this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And Iโ€”but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I justโ€”like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he saidโ€”Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it appliesโ€”I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it'sโ€” [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and Iโ€”pretend he's not hereโ€”I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we areโ€”and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure outโ€”I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember Iโ€”I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if youโ€”I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's overโ€”like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And Iโ€”this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent lifeโ€”and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's pointโ€”if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folksโ€”I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COOโ€”he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ)

37,640 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

Crowned by Confidence: A Collectorโ€™s Electrifying Message to the Worldโ€™s Most Beautiful Women - Miss World Contestants Awestruck ๐Ÿ‘‘On a night submerged in moonlight and meaning, under the spiritually charged skies of Buddha Purnima, something extraordinary happened. The worldโ€™s most beautiful womenโ€”contestants of Miss World 2025โ€”didnโ€™t just visit Buddha Vanam in Telangana. ๐Ÿ‘‘They were awakened, inspired, and redefined by the powerful words of a woman who didnโ€™t wear a crown, but carried one in her spirit โ€” the District Collector, Nalgonda ILA Tripathi . ๐Ÿ‘‘This wasnโ€™t a routine welcome. It was a call to purpose. A celebration of feminine force. A reminder that beauty is not worn โ€” it is owned. A Sacred Setting, A Timeless Message ๐Ÿ‘‘As the contestants stood in the heart of Buddha Vanam, a site steeped in heritage and serenity, the Collector opened her message by connecting the moment to something cosmic. The rare alignment of the Earth, Moon, and Sun on Buddha Purnima, she explained, was no coincidence. The moon, with its historic link to feminine energy, rhythm, and intuition, served as the perfect metaphor. ๐Ÿ‘‘"You are standing in alignment with the universe itself,โ€ she told them. โ€œAnd I say this not lightly โ€” the next Miss World is among you.โ€ Not a compliment. A declaration. โ€œYouโ€™re My Miss World, Because Youโ€™re My Worldโ€ ๐Ÿ‘‘What followed was a moment of intimacy and insight. The Collector shared a personal conversation with her husband, asking him what she should say to women of such global repute. His answer? โ€œYouโ€™re my Miss World, because youโ€™re my world.โ€ It wasnโ€™t just romanticโ€”it was revelatory. ๐Ÿ‘‘She reminded the delegates that their crowns had already been placed, long before this competitionโ€”by the parents who raised them, the friends who admired them, the communities who believed in them. โ€œTo someone, somewhere,โ€ she said, โ€œyou are already Miss World.โ€ When Confidence Beats Perfection ๐Ÿ‘‘Shifting gears from warmth to wisdom, the Collector spoke of the power that truly sets women apart โ€” confidence. โ€œEvery woman is beautiful,โ€ she said. โ€œBut itโ€™s your confidence that makes you unforgettable.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘‘She cited the iconic moment from Miss World 2000, when Indiaโ€™s Priyanka Chopranamed Mother Teresa as the most inspiring living woman. The answer was technically wrongโ€”Mother Teresa had already passed away. But Chopra delivered it with such poise and authenticity that she won the crown anyway. โ€œFlawless facts are impressive,โ€ the Collector said. โ€œBut flawless conviction? Thatโ€™s unstoppable.โ€ Beauty with a Purpose ๐Ÿ‘‘In a stirring call to action, the Collector urged the contestants not just to shine on stage but to ignite change back home. She implored them to champion causes for girls and women, especially at the grassroots. ๐Ÿ‘‘โ€œFind what moves you โ€” education, health, dignity, safety. Let it be hyper-local. Let it be real. Let your fame fuel a purpose bigger than the runway.โ€ And with a cheeky yet unforgettable line, she dropped the mic: โ€œRemember: Sisters before misters.โ€ Dream. Chase. Lift Others. The Collector closed with a poignant truth: ๐Ÿ‘‘โ€œToo many women have never even been asked what their dreams are โ€” let alone encouraged to chase them. But you? You know what a dream feels like. So chase it. And bring others with you.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘‘She wrapped up by acknowledging the flawless orchestration of the event by the police team led by SP Mr. Sharath Pawar, and the revenue and civil staff under Mr. Narayan Amit. She also hoped the delegates would savor Telanganaโ€™s hospitality โ€” even if delicately balanced with their disciplined diets. A Night to Remember ๐Ÿ‘‘Her final words didnโ€™t just close a speech. They sealed a moment in history: โ€œTonight is not just a ceremony โ€” itโ€™s a celebration of voice, vision, and womanhood.โ€ And as the moon shone over Buddha Vanam, the message was clear: They didnโ€™t need a crown to be Miss World. They already wore it โ€” in confidence, in compassion, and in cause. Telangana CMO Revanth Reddy Jupally Krishna Rao Office of Chief Secretary, Telangana Govt. Jayesh Ranjan Patel Ramesh Reddy Telangana Tourism Miss World Jayesh Ranjan #TelanganaTourism #IPRTelangana #MissWorldTelangana #MissWorld2025Hyderabad #TelanganaRising #MissWorld2025 #Hyderabad #GlobalGlamour

Jacob Ross

10,530 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If youโ€™re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Melloโ€™s affidavit. Itโ€™s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didnโ€™t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Melloโ€™s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I donโ€™t know. What the fuck do I know? Iโ€™m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peterโ€™s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means Iโ€™m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, thatโ€™s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kateโ€™s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindseyโ€™s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aidenโ€™s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peterโ€™s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, โ€œWhy are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.โ€ Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, letโ€™s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged inโ€”and I think it was Kate actually who did itโ€”but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if thatโ€™s what happened with Leighaโ€”I donโ€™t know, I wasnโ€™t aroundโ€”not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, itโ€™s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one wouldโ€”itโ€™s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just donโ€™t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, donโ€™t fucking do it. Please donโ€™t do it. I donโ€™t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I donโ€™t understand why people justify it. Oh, itโ€™s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. Itโ€™s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Donโ€™t do it back. Just stop. Itโ€™s ridiculous. Steph's likeโ€”"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I donโ€™t know what to tell you. You donโ€™t have to call her that, but Iโ€™m going to do that, right? And Iโ€™m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Even while youโ€™re on your break. By the way, Steph, Iโ€™m just going to break here just posting things, right? And Iโ€™m saying Iโ€™m not even supposed to be riled up right now. Weโ€™re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. Iโ€™m just a little towel. Iโ€™m on one, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Absolutely not. I donโ€™t know which Steph you are. I donโ€™t know if youโ€™re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. Youโ€™re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Iโ€™m going to triple down. Iโ€™m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. Iโ€™ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, itโ€™s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, sheโ€™s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, thatโ€™s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and Iโ€™m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Itโ€™s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you donโ€™t want to be talked about in public. Thatโ€™s the reality. Is that not right Steph, youโ€™re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, whoโ€™s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to peopleโ€™s reports in this chat, and you feel that itโ€™s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because youโ€™re biased, right? Fine, I donโ€™t care. Iโ€™ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Letโ€™s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. Thatโ€™s correct. I donโ€™t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, letโ€™s be clear. I wouldnโ€™t say youโ€™re debating me, Steph. You canโ€™t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. Itโ€™s almost like thereโ€™s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peterโ€™s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And youโ€™re not going to be able to do anything about itโ€”oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "whatโ€™s wrong with towel, Steph?" Youโ€™re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, โ€œWhat is Grant doing?โ€ because I wonโ€™t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody elseโ€™s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And thereโ€™s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. Iโ€™m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? Weโ€™ll do it. No, no, Iโ€™m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. Iโ€™m loyal to truth. Iโ€™m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. Iโ€™m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, letโ€™s go with that. Yep, letโ€™s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. Thatโ€™s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctorโ€™s familyโ€™s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? Iโ€™ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. Sheโ€™s riling me up. Youโ€™re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what Iโ€™m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if youโ€™re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. Youโ€™ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesnโ€™t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because weโ€™re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. Iโ€™ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Donโ€™t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I donโ€™t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinelyโ€”not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, โ€œHe wonโ€™t know.โ€ What, are you just going to tell me Iโ€™m the greatest thing ever and then itโ€™s going to go along? Iโ€™m just saying, Iโ€™ve been posting on social media being like, โ€œAidan, if people tell you that youโ€™re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because theyโ€™re moles.โ€ Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What Iโ€™m concerned about, okayโ€”Iโ€™m not concerned about who you are as a person. Iโ€™m concerned about what you didnโ€™t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, whatโ€™s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™sโ€”see what Iโ€™m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for youโ€”Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. Thatโ€™s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. Itโ€™s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. Thatโ€™s just odd. Like sheโ€™s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one whoโ€™s a second cousin of John Oโ€™Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. Thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, broโ€”if you are that Stephโ€”you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minuteโ€”are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was notโ€”I didnโ€™t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I donโ€™t even haveโ€”no, that is not the question Iโ€™m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, itโ€™s not the same Steph. Itโ€™s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. Iโ€™m rolling my eyes so hard Iโ€™m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If youโ€™re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. Youโ€™re bothering me. If you bother me too much, Iโ€™m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So itโ€™s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldnโ€™t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which Iโ€™m doing. You havenโ€™t addressed one element of it on substance. All youโ€™ve done is gaslight, and frankly youโ€™re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, donโ€™t be discriminatory; two, donโ€™t be derogatory; three, donโ€™t sealion; four, donโ€™t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jayโ€™s like, โ€œIโ€™m aboard the Grant train.โ€ Thanks, Jay. It wasnโ€™t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done. Oh, itโ€™s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. Weโ€™ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? Iโ€™m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just donโ€™tโ€”I donโ€™t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Brโ€ฆ every possible perspective. I donโ€™t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. Itโ€™s not that. Iโ€™ll never ever have a problem with that. Itโ€™s the bad faithโ€”and itโ€™s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. Youโ€™ve never done itโ€”but itโ€™s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still donโ€™t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope thatโ€”I hope that tells us all something. But yes, letโ€™s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we wereโ€”I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very lastโ€”so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like thatโ€™s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middleโ€”thatโ€™s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, thatโ€”I donโ€™t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinksโ€”who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think heโ€™s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently sheโ€™s a big advocate of prednisone. I donโ€™t really understand. Sheโ€™s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they canโ€™t use cannabis. Iโ€™m baffled by it. I didnโ€™t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether sheโ€™s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because Iโ€™ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, sheโ€™s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peterโ€™s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesnโ€™t know what sheโ€™s talking about and she doesnโ€™t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesnโ€™t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 8 Monaten