Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Charles Kanjama: It is a groundbreaking ruling because it is breaking new ground. It is a ruling that, in my view, takes the country a bit backwards on issues of public participation. Personally, I am a bit disappointed on that issue, and I feel that on some of the... show more

Citizen TV Kenya

6,862,209 subscribers

14,646 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

35,563 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Charles Kanjama: Normally, when a right to fair trial or fair hearing is infringed, you invalidate the hearing, you set it aside, or you order a new trial. This is the first time in my experience as a lawyer that the court has made a clear finding that the right to a fair trial was substantively violated but has failed to reverse the underlying outcome of that fair trial. The court said our hands are tied because impeachment is final; we cannot undo it. The court at that time said we can overturn the outcome of the impeachment, but today it has said once the impeachment is done, it cannot be overturned. There is a lot of inconsistency in the decision of the court #CitizenMondayReport

Charles Kanjama: Normally, when a right to fair trial or fair hearing is infringed, you invalidate the hearing, you set it aside, or you order a new trial. This is the first time in my experience as a lawyer that the court has made a clear finding that the right to a fair trial was substantively violated but has failed to reverse the underlying outcome of that fair trial. The court said our hands are tied because impeachment is final; we cannot undo it. The court at that time said we can overturn the outcome of the impeachment, but today it has said once the impeachment is done, it cannot be overturned. There is a lot of inconsistency in the decision of the court #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

121,932 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

BREAKING: The home secretary says she is "disappointed" by a High Court ruling that Palestine Action's prescription as a terrorist organisation was unlawful on two grounds. Shabana Mahmood said she intended to fight the judgement in the Court of Appeal.

BREAKING: The home secretary says she is "disappointed" by a High Court ruling that Palestine Action's prescription as a terrorist organisation was unlawful on two grounds. Shabana Mahmood said she intended to fight the judgement in the Court of Appeal.

Sky News

90,460 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

.President Donald J. Trump: "Because of the mail-in ballot ruling, which was a little bit surprising... the [SAVE America Act] is even more important... the ruling, which a lot of people were waiting for, that was a ruling that was—I think it was very detrimental to honest elections."

.President Donald J. Trump: "Because of the mail-in ballot ruling, which was a little bit surprising... the [SAVE America Act] is even more important... the ruling, which a lot of people were waiting for, that was a ruling that was—I think it was very detrimental to honest elections."

Rapid Response 47

175,007 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BREAKING: Judge Brian Cregan refuses to give key ruling but instead directs school to prepare fresh imprisonment and sequestration papers At last week’s hearing, Enoch Burke had submitted that due to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in July this year, the Order of the High Court upholding his suspension was no longer enforceable. The Court of Appeal ruled in July that the principal’s instruction to call a child “they” is a “a kernel” of the case and must be examined for its legitimacy. Judge Cregan had said that his ruling on this issue would be delivered by today. Instead, turning a blind eye to the Court of Appeal judgment, Judge Cregan opened proceedings today by directing the school to prepare fresh papers for the attachment and committal to prison of Enoch Burke and seizure of cars. Dark days in Irish Courts.

BREAKING: Judge Brian Cregan refuses to give key ruling but instead directs school to prepare fresh imprisonment and sequestration papers At last week’s hearing, Enoch Burke had submitted that due to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in July this year, the Order of the High Court upholding his suspension was no longer enforceable. The Court of Appeal ruled in July that the principal’s instruction to call a child “they” is a “a kernel” of the case and must be examined for its legitimacy. Judge Cregan had said that his ruling on this issue would be delivered by today. Instead, turning a blind eye to the Court of Appeal judgment, Judge Cregan opened proceedings today by directing the school to prepare fresh papers for the attachment and committal to prison of Enoch Burke and seizure of cars. Dark days in Irish Courts.

Enoch Burke

293,993 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

Democratic Front (DF)

20,824 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.

Enoch Burke

149,178 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

In a Constitutional democracy the last line of defence is the Constitutional Court. When the apex court appears to lack independence and takes over 500 days to issue a ruling on a simple case pertaining to the failure of Parliament to oversee the Executive, the social contract that keeps the country together is under threat.

In a Constitutional democracy the last line of defence is the Constitutional Court. When the apex court appears to lack independence and takes over 500 days to issue a ruling on a simple case pertaining to the failure of Parliament to oversee the Executive, the social contract that keeps the country together is under threat.

Vuyo Zungula MP 🇿🇦

15,798 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

A sickening attempt is being made to discredit the Ayodhya judgment. Praying to God for a solution does not mean that the solution was provided by God. The only friend of justice is evidence. And evidence it was that prevailed in the Supreme court Ayodhya judgment. My views:

A sickening attempt is being made to discredit the Ayodhya judgment. Praying to God for a solution does not mean that the solution was provided by God. The only friend of justice is evidence. And evidence it was that prevailed in the Supreme court Ayodhya judgment. My views:

Anand Ranganathan

205,947 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Scott Jennings takes a moment to remind the CNN panel of the one thing the Supreme Court ruling proved today. It completely SHATTERED a multi-year Democrat narrative. Scott Jennings: “And I’ll tell you one more thing.” “For every Democrat and every media person that has gone on for the last year or two about how this Supreme Court is a wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump, that it’s not independent, that it does whatever he says to do…” “Obviously, that narrative was OBLITERATED today.” “So to me, I thought this was actually…I thought the ruling was sound.” “I think the president is sound to try other statutes.” “And I think the narratives about the court not being independent and the president not obeying the court were TOTALLY blown up today.”

Scott Jennings takes a moment to remind the CNN panel of the one thing the Supreme Court ruling proved today. It completely SHATTERED a multi-year Democrat narrative. Scott Jennings: “And I’ll tell you one more thing.” “For every Democrat and every media person that has gone on for the last year or two about how this Supreme Court is a wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump, that it’s not independent, that it does whatever he says to do…” “Obviously, that narrative was OBLITERATED today.” “So to me, I thought this was actually…I thought the ruling was sound.” “I think the president is sound to try other statutes.” “And I think the narratives about the court not being independent and the president not obeying the court were TOTALLY blown up today.”

Overton

457,122 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I read the decision of the court, and I largely agree with the ruling, to the extent that the prosecutor could have done better. My only disappointment has to do with the court. I was expecting that, even after arriving at that conclusion, the court, in the spirit of accountability, should have ordered a retrial. - Kwesi Kwarteng on the Sedina Tamakloe case #NewDay #TV3GH

I read the decision of the court, and I largely agree with the ruling, to the extent that the prosecutor could have done better. My only disappointment has to do with the court. I was expecting that, even after arriving at that conclusion, the court, in the spirit of accountability, should have ordered a retrial. - Kwesi Kwarteng on the Sedina Tamakloe case #NewDay #TV3GH

#TV3GH

65,097 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Will Ospreay has revealed part of the reason behind why Baba O'Riley was chosen for his AEW All In 2026 entrance was because the song was used for an MV Zone tribute video to Bryan Danielson in 2011. "There was a song that we wanted, but we just couldn’t get a licence fee for it. I won’t put it out there because maybe one of these days I will be able to track it down again. I’d like to leave that as a surprise. But it was Mike Mansury that came up with the idea of The Who Baba O’Riley. "I’ll be honest with you, I have a connection with that song because there was a music video from the MV Zone. It was like a kind of little backyard wrestling music video group, and they did a Bryan Danielson tribute to that song, so I have a little bit of a connection to it. "I was just okay, I quite like the idea and The Who is British as well, so that’s kind of cool. But I remember listening to it and on the travels that me and Al (Alex Windsor) did, and I was just like, I don’t know if I feel it. The other song that I wanted got my juices flowing. It was my favourite song. I don’t know if I feel it. It was only when I heard the voiceover and I saw the clips that were all around it. I was like, 'this is perfect. This is it. Don’t change a thing.'" (Source: Chris Van Vliet)

Will Ospreay has revealed part of the reason behind why Baba O'Riley was chosen for his AEW All In 2026 entrance was because the song was used for an MV Zone tribute video to Bryan Danielson in 2011. "There was a song that we wanted, but we just couldn’t get a licence fee for it. I won’t put it out there because maybe one of these days I will be able to track it down again. I’d like to leave that as a surprise. But it was Mike Mansury that came up with the idea of The Who Baba O’Riley. "I’ll be honest with you, I have a connection with that song because there was a music video from the MV Zone. It was like a kind of little backyard wrestling music video group, and they did a Bryan Danielson tribute to that song, so I have a little bit of a connection to it. "I was just okay, I quite like the idea and The Who is British as well, so that’s kind of cool. But I remember listening to it and on the travels that me and Al (Alex Windsor) did, and I was just like, I don’t know if I feel it. The other song that I wanted got my juices flowing. It was my favourite song. I don’t know if I feel it. It was only when I heard the voiceover and I saw the clips that were all around it. I was like, 'this is perfect. This is it. Don’t change a thing.'" (Source: Chris Van Vliet)

Cultaholic Wrestling

29,644 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BREAKING: President Trump just spoke with Fox's Bret Baier on the phone ahead of his address to the nation on what's happening with Iran: "He is very pleased with how things are going, obviously is disheartened about the loss of life." "He said that as far as a plan, they do have a plan, always had a plan. The intelligence, the level of intelligence that they've had up until this point is truly amazing." "I asked, so what you're saying is that you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?" Trump quote: "Yeah, I feel there is. I feel that, and some of them are no longer with us, to be honest, because it was 49 leaders that were taken out."

BREAKING: President Trump just spoke with Fox's Bret Baier on the phone ahead of his address to the nation on what's happening with Iran: "He is very pleased with how things are going, obviously is disheartened about the loss of life." "He said that as far as a plan, they do have a plan, always had a plan. The intelligence, the level of intelligence that they've had up until this point is truly amazing." "I asked, so what you're saying is that you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?" Trump quote: "Yeah, I feel there is. I feel that, and some of them are no longer with us, to be honest, because it was 49 leaders that were taken out."

Gunther Eagleman™

60,870 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Asmongold regrets enabling the Blizzard harassment scandal "I feel kind of bad about this. At the time I was very much in favor of the Blizzard harassment scandal. There was not a lot of evidence to the contrary, but I do kind of feel bad that I was a part of this and I enabled it to the degree that I did." "The truth is usually gray. It's not black or white. There probably were weird things happening at Blizzard, but it probably wasn't the breast milk factory sexual assault extravaganza that everybody made it out to be."

Asmongold regrets enabling the Blizzard harassment scandal "I feel kind of bad about this. At the time I was very much in favor of the Blizzard harassment scandal. There was not a lot of evidence to the contrary, but I do kind of feel bad that I was a part of this and I enabled it to the degree that I did." "The truth is usually gray. It's not black or white. There probably were weird things happening at Blizzard, but it probably wasn't the breast milk factory sexual assault extravaganza that everybody made it out to be."

Asmongold Updates

11,637 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨"I worry about Burnham on trans issues, he'll frame it as a CULTURE WAR" Sex Matters' Helen Joyce claims that Labour are trying to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman and that Starmer is trying to help circumvent the ruling. Helen Joyce | Julia Hartley-Brewer

🚨"I worry about Burnham on trans issues, he'll frame it as a CULTURE WAR" Sex Matters' Helen Joyce claims that Labour are trying to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman and that Starmer is trying to help circumvent the ruling. Helen Joyce | Julia Hartley-Brewer

Talk

26,306 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal's letter to Delhi High Court Chief Justice, Sacchin Puri, Advocate & Vice President Of Delhi High Court Bar Association says, "I believe that this is not correct. It is politicising the entire issue. The judgment has come. If you don't agree with the judgment, you have a remedy to appeal or revision or as the case may be. But to issue this kind of a letter in which you are acknowledging the fact that I have a right to appeal and without prejudice, I'm writing this to those rights, then you are taking the system on and saying today that you are bringing the prestige of the system down. It is not acceptable. There was no reason for such a letter to be posted in the public domain. You had a right which was right to appeal or revision. You should have exercised that. This is only scandalising the entire issue and trying to put pressure indirectly or directly on the judicial system."

#WATCH | Delhi: On AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal's letter to Delhi High Court Chief Justice, Sacchin Puri, Advocate & Vice President Of Delhi High Court Bar Association says, "I believe that this is not correct. It is politicising the entire issue. The judgment has come. If you don't agree with the judgment, you have a remedy to appeal or revision or as the case may be. But to issue this kind of a letter in which you are acknowledging the fact that I have a right to appeal and without prejudice, I'm writing this to those rights, then you are taking the system on and saying today that you are bringing the prestige of the system down. It is not acceptable. There was no reason for such a letter to be posted in the public domain. You had a right which was right to appeal or revision. You should have exercised that. This is only scandalising the entire issue and trying to put pressure indirectly or directly on the judicial system."

ANI

46,793 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce