正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATED Don’t be distracted by the partisan wars blaming the neoliberal fake ‘left’ for the assassination of Charlie Kirk; powerful interests have bought the government of the United States and direct foreign policy. Charlie Kirk, a staunch Zionist, was beginning to question Israel’s version of events, showed...

150,507 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATED IN LONG-RANGE SNIPER STRIKE. Charlie Kirk reportedly feared Israel would kill him if he turned against them according to Infowars’ Harrison H. Smith. Charlie Kirk had recently moderated a debate between anti-genocide comedian Dave Smith and Josh Hammer, as even much of the MAGA base sees through Israel’s blatant lies now. On Megyn Kelly’s show, Kirk showed frustration at Israel, after being labelled an anti-Semite despite his continual defence of Israel while it perpetrates genocide in Gaza. That leads to the question; did Israel order the assassination of Charlie Kirk? If not, who did? No matter if one agreed with his views or found them repugnant, the assassination of a popular political influencer voicing his opinions and inviting debate, debate that is essential to democracy itself, shows the oligarchic mass surveillance ‘democracy’ in the United States, where free speech has been under intensifying attack over the years, is now decaying into something far worse under the weight of its own contradictions. US social cohesion is now at boiling point. While Americans deal with extreme wealth inequality and political polarisation that intensifies by the day, Washington desperately tries to cling to hegemony with imperial violence all around the world, via proxy wars and other acts of aggression. With an unrestrained, genocidal Israel bombing multiple countries in the space of 24 hours, and a domestically unstable and desperate abroad US that has had its foreign policy bought by AIPAC…the US may now be more dangerous than ever before, both domestically, and for the rest of the world.

Afshin Rattansi

417,280 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens Candace Owens laugh about the assassination of Charlie Kirk by Tyler Robinson! WATCH this video of both of them LAUGHING about the murder of Charlie Kirk. Candace and Bassem Youssef laughed hysterically while “joking” about how they think Erika Kirk Erika Kirk supposedly murdered her husband. And on Friday, during his interview with Russell Brand Russell Brand, Tucker laughed so hard at the thought of Charlie Kirk being assassinated, that he cried from laughing. Tucker then proceeded to post this video short on his official YouTube channel of himself hysterically laughing about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk. Tucker titled the YouTube short “The Truth About Tyler Robinson”. Russell Brand was “joking” about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk by insinuating that the shooter with a furry trans boyfriend was controlled by "the most powerful interests in the world." Gee, I wonder which "most powerful people" Russell and Tucker had in mind... The only people who laugh at the thought of ANYONE being brutally executed are sociopaths. And yet, here we have both Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens laughing about the murder of their supposed "friend." Tucker and Candace aren't just grifters, they're ghouls! Tucker is every bit as evil as Candace, and anyone who still supports them will be joining them in the fiery pits of hell. Cc: Turning Point USA Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet JD Vance

Laura Loomer

1,535,045 次观看 • 5 个月前

Charlie Kirk Assassination and the Palestinian Equivalence Lie! The narcissism of the Palestinian cause to besmirch Charlie Kirk and the legacy of Charlie Kirk would be astounding if it wasn’t so pathetically expected. No! This is not what is happening on a daily basis to Palestinians. There is NO equivalency except an inverse relation between the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the death of Palestinians in their wars against Israel. Charlie Kirk chose words. Palestinians choose wars. That’s the difference. Charlie fought his battle verbally. Those who propose to “Free Palestine” choose to fight viciously with violence. You cheered October 7th. Charlie Kirk shuddered at October 7th. It was everything he opposed. Instead of settling the issue with debate, there was decapitation on October 7th (yes there was; I’ve seen the video). The whole point is that Charlie Kirk chose debate. Disputes. Peace. Even when you vehemently disagreed with him, Charlie Kirk wanted to talk it out. The Palestinians aren’t exactly known for talking it out. They’re more known for murdering an Israeli, taking the Israeli’s phone, and talking about how much religious joy they get from “murdering 10 Israeli with my own hands.” The people like Philip Proudfoot and Lucas Gage and Bassem Youssef will have you believe that they are Charlie Kirk in this scenario. They want you to believe that they and those they stand for are the assassinated in this scenario. You are not the assassinated, you are the assassins. Yasser Arafat claimed to choose peace and then initiated the Second Intifada. Yahya Sinwar was saved by an Israeli dentist and the initiated October 7th. There is NO equivalency between Charlie Kirk getting murdered (by an alleged antifa member whom I’m sure backs the Palestinian cause) and Palestinians getting killed in a war. Charlie chose words and peace on a daily basis. He chose forgiveness through his faith. And he was murdered for that. Palestinians and Palestinian leaders chose war—over and over again they chose and choose war—and far that Palestinians are dying on a daily basis. Luckily, that can all be avoided if Palestinians embrace Charlie Kirk’s true legacy and choose words over war. It’s your choice, it’s always your choice. Choose wisely

Jake Donnelly

16,537 次观看 • 1 年前