Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Charlie Kirk wasn’t killed with a 30-06 This test involved using a very expensive bust, a ballistic-tipped bullet that surpasses the energy transfer of soft point and FMJ. Despite the most favorable scenario allowable, it still resulted in the dummy’s head being blown off. Regardless of the type of...

NihiloX's profile picture

Travis

29,912 subscribers

136,308 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.
1:18

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

Travis

172,465 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.
1:59

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,506 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:
59:24

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

323,775 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens
6:43

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.
2:01

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.

Liz Wheeler

16,481 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting
5:13

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting

The SCIF

133,791 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

HOLY SH*T! 🚨 100% CONFIRMED - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT… AND IT WASN’T THE GUN THEY TOLD US 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “Charlie’s neck did indeed stop the bullet. Without question. 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. A fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd 6. There is not one reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate. Hunters rejoice. You guys were right. It means he was shot with a completely different gun.”
3:29

HOLY SH*T! 🚨 100% CONFIRMED - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT… AND IT WASN’T THE GUN THEY TOLD US 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “Charlie’s neck did indeed stop the bullet. Without question. 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. A fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd 6. There is not one reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate. Hunters rejoice. You guys were right. It means he was shot with a completely different gun.”

HustleBitch

4,128,126 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Video from behind Charlie Kirk was released and shows NO signs of a .30-06 or any catastrophic damage of any kind from a bullet projectile at all. The best snipers in the world all stated themselves that the damage would have been extremely graphic and catastrophic from a .30-06 round. So what really happened? I leave this up to you to decide. What I will say is that there are a lot more questions than answers.
7:25

Video from behind Charlie Kirk was released and shows NO signs of a .30-06 or any catastrophic damage of any kind from a bullet projectile at all. The best snipers in the world all stated themselves that the damage would have been extremely graphic and catastrophic from a .30-06 round. So what really happened? I leave this up to you to decide. What I will say is that there are a lot more questions than answers.

The SCIF

95,400 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Candace Owens says she was able to verify that Charlie Kirk was shot with a different caliber gun than is being claimed and there was no .30-06 bullet recovered on the death certificate.
6:30

Candace Owens says she was able to verify that Charlie Kirk was shot with a different caliber gun than is being claimed and there was no .30-06 bullet recovered on the death certificate.

ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

34,950 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Even using a pig roast with a 1.5-inch leg bone, we could not get a .30-06 bullet to stop. Not only did it go through the leg bone, but it also blew a hole in the OSB sheet of wood behind it. Translation: the FBI's story is B.S. Full report:
2:17

Even using a pig roast with a 1.5-inch leg bone, we could not get a .30-06 bullet to stop. Not only did it go through the leg bone, but it also blew a hole in the OSB sheet of wood behind it. Translation: the FBI's story is B.S. Full report:

Chris Martenson

19,832 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Candace Owens shows an exclusives photo from the back of Charlie Kirk at the time of his assassination! There’s no blood on his back, and no exit wound! Completely destroying the 30-06 narrative. So what took Charlie Kirk’s life, because it sure wasn’t a 30-06 round?
0:59

Candace Owens shows an exclusives photo from the back of Charlie Kirk at the time of his assassination! There’s no blood on his back, and no exit wound! Completely destroying the 30-06 narrative. So what took Charlie Kirk’s life, because it sure wasn’t a 30-06 round?

FromConvict2Conservative

48,730 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

MTG challenges the official Charlie Kirk shooting narrative “I’ve shot a .30-06... and I know the damage that that bullet does... so it's hard for me to go along with the traditional narrative.”
3:49

MTG challenges the official Charlie Kirk shooting narrative “I’ve shot a .30-06... and I know the damage that that bullet does... so it's hard for me to go along with the traditional narrative.”

HatsOff

31,510 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!
51:16

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!

Alex Jones

522,428 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Alex Jones has some quirky takes sometimes I don’t agree with… but here I do. A .30-06 round hit Charlie in the neck, soft tissue, and basically something as frail as chicken bones stoped it. The only way I’d be able to accept this is if the 30-06 round ricocheted off of something and a fragment hit his neck. “Man of Steel”
2:42

Alex Jones has some quirky takes sometimes I don’t agree with… but here I do. A .30-06 round hit Charlie in the neck, soft tissue, and basically something as frail as chicken bones stoped it. The only way I’d be able to accept this is if the 30-06 round ricocheted off of something and a fragment hit his neck. “Man of Steel”

MJTruthUltra

20,428 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨Andrew Wilson informs Joe Rogan about the U.S. Army’s documentation of .30-06 rounds not always producing exit wounds and the Remington 150-grain Core-Lokt soft points reportedly used by Tyler Robinson. ROGAN: "The thing about guns, though, is weird stuff happens when you shoot bones. It is possible that you wouldn't get a passthrough depending on how it hit the spinal column and depending on what kind of bullet it is." WILSON: "These are Remington 150-grain Core-Lokt soft tips." ROGAN: "Okay, so those expand inside the body, causing massive trauma." WILSON: "The .30-06 was used in World War I & II and Korea. The U.S. Army has studied .30-06 entry wounds in depth and produced many manuals explaining how cavitation works and that the bullet doesn't always penetrate, and that's with full metal jacket rounds that are designed for maximum penetration. Not 150-grain Core-Lokt soft points. It could easily split up, and that's why they ended up pulling fragments out of Charlie. It wouldn't surprise me, when we have all the data from the coroner's report, that he has tons of shards all throughout his chest because they were saying that there's trauma inside the chest, which would make sense if the bullet shatterred against his neck and fragmented." ROGAN: "That is an important distinction about the type of bullet." WILSON: "The U.S. Army has studied this in depth. I went back and pulled all their manuals and put them out. The second it hits the human body, the energy quickly dissipates, so it doesn't always go through. Oftentimes it does with the FMJ, but even then, it doesn't always go through. Another one would be MLK. He gets hit through the jaw and it ends up in him. So it's totally possible that Charlie was hit with a .30-06." ROGAN: "It is definitely possible." Joe Rogan Andrew Wilson
3:24

🚨Andrew Wilson informs Joe Rogan about the U.S. Army’s documentation of .30-06 rounds not always producing exit wounds and the Remington 150-grain Core-Lokt soft points reportedly used by Tyler Robinson. ROGAN: "The thing about guns, though, is weird stuff happens when you shoot bones. It is possible that you wouldn't get a passthrough depending on how it hit the spinal column and depending on what kind of bullet it is." WILSON: "These are Remington 150-grain Core-Lokt soft tips." ROGAN: "Okay, so those expand inside the body, causing massive trauma." WILSON: "The .30-06 was used in World War I & II and Korea. The U.S. Army has studied .30-06 entry wounds in depth and produced many manuals explaining how cavitation works and that the bullet doesn't always penetrate, and that's with full metal jacket rounds that are designed for maximum penetration. Not 150-grain Core-Lokt soft points. It could easily split up, and that's why they ended up pulling fragments out of Charlie. It wouldn't surprise me, when we have all the data from the coroner's report, that he has tons of shards all throughout his chest because they were saying that there's trauma inside the chest, which would make sense if the bullet shatterred against his neck and fragmented." ROGAN: "That is an important distinction about the type of bullet." WILSON: "The U.S. Army has studied this in depth. I went back and pulled all their manuals and put them out. The second it hits the human body, the energy quickly dissipates, so it doesn't always go through. Oftentimes it does with the FMJ, but even then, it doesn't always go through. Another one would be MLK. He gets hit through the jaw and it ends up in him. So it's totally possible that Charlie was hit with a .30-06." ROGAN: "It is definitely possible." Joe Rogan Andrew Wilson

KanekoaTheGreat

591,314 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Starship is 30 times faster than a bullet from a handgun, and it is the size of a Skyscraper It is one of the biggest innovations in human history.
1:19

Starship is 30 times faster than a bullet from a handgun, and it is the size of a Skyscraper It is one of the biggest innovations in human history.

SMX 🇺🇸

90,511 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

⚡🚨JUST IN: Baron Coleman says he doesn't know how prosecutors will convince 12 jurors that Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 bullet. He said it's possible there's technology the public isn't aware of, but added that it's becoming increasingly obvious to him that something happened underneath the shirt.
2:59

⚡🚨JUST IN: Baron Coleman says he doesn't know how prosecutors will convince 12 jurors that Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 bullet. He said it's possible there's technology the public isn't aware of, but added that it's becoming increasingly obvious to him that something happened underneath the shirt.

Jody Chase

76,524 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin
8:57

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

The SCIF

17,884 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution
3:05

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution

The SCIF

437,653 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

'This was a bullet not just to the neck of Charlie Kirk, but to the heart of the First Amendment.’ Rachel Johnson reflects on the future of free speech in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.
1:05

'This was a bullet not just to the neck of Charlie Kirk, but to the heart of the First Amendment.’ Rachel Johnson reflects on the future of free speech in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.

LBC

13,472 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce