正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Chatbots aren’t the revolution. They’re the distraction. Fei-Fei Li: “Language is a half-million-year-old luxury. Perception is a half-billion-year-old necessity.” Evolution didn’t optimize for conversation. It optimized for survival in three-dimensional space. Seeing threats, navigating obstacles, predicting what happens when you move. We’ve spent years celebrating AI that can write...

r0ck3t23's profile picture

Dustin

37,128 subscribers

51,754 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Fei-Fei Li just called out the biggest blind spot in the entire AI industry. We have been building half of human intelligence. And calling it the finish line. Li: “If you look at human intelligence, it pretty much boils down to two buckets.” The first bucket is language. Symbolic reasoning. Communication. The ability to think in words and abstractions. That’s what every major AI lab has spent the last decade building. The second bucket is the one the industry has almost entirely ignored. Li: “We call that in AI spatial intelligence.” How humans and animals perceive, navigate, and interact with the three-dimensional physical world. How we reach for objects. How we move through space. How we build and manipulate physical reality. From painting masterpieces to constructing the pyramids, non-verbal spatial intelligence is what actually shapes the world. Language describes reality. Spatial intelligence acts on it. And the gap between those two things is the gap between a chatbot and a robot. Li: “When this technology is ready, the robotic revolution is gonna start. We’re already seeing that trend.” Every robot is a moving agent. Every moving agent requires spatial intelligence to function in the real world. The humanoid robots being deployed in factories right now are hitting the ceiling of what language models alone can power. Spatial intelligence is the unlock. But Li didn’t stop at robotics. Li: “From a geopolitics point of view, this is part of the technology that goes straight into weapons.” Autonomous drone swarms. Battlefield navigation. Physical target acquisition without human oversight. Every military application of AI that operates in the real world runs on spatial intelligence. The nation that masters the transition from static text to dynamic three-dimensional perception doesn’t just win the software race. It commands the physical battlefield. The AI arms race just broke out of the data center. It’s operating in three dimensions now.
3:08

Dr. Fei-Fei Li just called out the biggest blind spot in the entire AI industry. We have been building half of human intelligence. And calling it the finish line. Li: “If you look at human intelligence, it pretty much boils down to two buckets.” The first bucket is language. Symbolic reasoning. Communication. The ability to think in words and abstractions. That’s what every major AI lab has spent the last decade building. The second bucket is the one the industry has almost entirely ignored. Li: “We call that in AI spatial intelligence.” How humans and animals perceive, navigate, and interact with the three-dimensional physical world. How we reach for objects. How we move through space. How we build and manipulate physical reality. From painting masterpieces to constructing the pyramids, non-verbal spatial intelligence is what actually shapes the world. Language describes reality. Spatial intelligence acts on it. And the gap between those two things is the gap between a chatbot and a robot. Li: “When this technology is ready, the robotic revolution is gonna start. We’re already seeing that trend.” Every robot is a moving agent. Every moving agent requires spatial intelligence to function in the real world. The humanoid robots being deployed in factories right now are hitting the ceiling of what language models alone can power. Spatial intelligence is the unlock. But Li didn’t stop at robotics. Li: “From a geopolitics point of view, this is part of the technology that goes straight into weapons.” Autonomous drone swarms. Battlefield navigation. Physical target acquisition without human oversight. Every military application of AI that operates in the real world runs on spatial intelligence. The nation that masters the transition from static text to dynamic three-dimensional perception doesn’t just win the software race. It commands the physical battlefield. The AI arms race just broke out of the data center. It’s operating in three dimensions now.

Dustin

122,680 次观看 • 4 个月前

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.
1:41

📁 Fei-Fei Li founder of World Labs, says the next leap in AI is not language. Human intelligence does not just speak, it moves, perceives, and acts in the physical world. Spatial intelligence is the real core of intelligence. From text to space, from models to 3D and 4D worlds, from understanding words to interacting with reality. The next chapter is not read, it is inhabited.

Jon Hernandez

20,592 次观看 • 5 个月前

The moment is right to push forward into a new frontier for AI — one that is as fundamental as language, says Fei-Fei Li. That frontier is visual spatial intelligence. With Justin Johnson (Justin Johnson), her cofounder at World Labs, and a16z's martin_casado, Fei-Fei explains what unlocking this technology could mean, and why we’re in the midst of a “Cambrian explosion”:
48:09

The moment is right to push forward into a new frontier for AI — one that is as fundamental as language, says Fei-Fei Li. That frontier is visual spatial intelligence. With Justin Johnson (Justin Johnson), her cofounder at World Labs, and a16z's martin_casado, Fei-Fei explains what unlocking this technology could mean, and why we’re in the midst of a “Cambrian explosion”:

a16z

476,703 次观看 • 1 年前

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.
1:15

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.

Jon Hernandez

20,744 次观看 • 5 个月前

"Visual-spatial intelligence is as fundamental as language." Fei-Fei Li says world models are the key to letting AI see the world, reason about it, interact with it, navigate it, and even 'build civilization upon it.' "It's very natural for me that World Labs' north star is to unlock spatial intelligence. The moment to me is right to do it." "We've got these ingredients—we've got compute, we've got a much deeper understanding of data, way deeper than [the ImageNet days]... and we've got some advancement of algorithms."
1:27

"Visual-spatial intelligence is as fundamental as language." Fei-Fei Li says world models are the key to letting AI see the world, reason about it, interact with it, navigate it, and even 'build civilization upon it.' "It's very natural for me that World Labs' north star is to unlock spatial intelligence. The moment to me is right to do it." "We've got these ingredients—we've got compute, we've got a much deeper understanding of data, way deeper than [the ImageNet days]... and we've got some advancement of algorithms."

a16z

31,675 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li), the Godmother of AI, on the origin of computer vision and why spatial intelligence is the next frontier. At AI Startup School in San Francisco. 01:00 - Origins of ImageNet 02:15 - The Dream to Make Machines See 03:28 - A paradigm shift in AI 05:50 - AlexNet and Deep Learning 08:00 - Evolving Computer Vision 12:20 - Building World Labs 13:00 - The next frontier in AI 14:20 - Why Spatial Intelligence Is Harder Than Language 18:40 - Technical Barriers for Vision-Based AI 20:00 - AI is more than LLMs 25:50 - Fei Fei’s Journey 29:30 - Mentoring some of the legends of AI 33:00 - Audience Q&A
44:21

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li), the Godmother of AI, on the origin of computer vision and why spatial intelligence is the next frontier. At AI Startup School in San Francisco. 01:00 - Origins of ImageNet 02:15 - The Dream to Make Machines See 03:28 - A paradigm shift in AI 05:50 - AlexNet and Deep Learning 08:00 - Evolving Computer Vision 12:20 - Building World Labs 13:00 - The next frontier in AI 14:20 - Why Spatial Intelligence Is Harder Than Language 18:40 - Technical Barriers for Vision-Based AI 20:00 - AI is more than LLMs 25:50 - Fei Fei’s Journey 29:30 - Mentoring some of the legends of AI 33:00 - Audience Q&A

Y Combinator

194,393 次观看 • 1 年前

Thought experiment: If you were blindfolded in a room and someone only described what’s around you… could you complete a task? Now imagine seeing the room. Instantly, your brain reconstructs the space in 3D. That’s why language isn’t enough. martin_casado and Fei-Fei Li explain why spatial intelligence is the next frontier for AI — and why mastering the physical world matters more than language alone. Listen to the full conversation from the a16z LP Summit:
1:36

Thought experiment: If you were blindfolded in a room and someone only described what’s around you… could you complete a task? Now imagine seeing the room. Instantly, your brain reconstructs the space in 3D. That’s why language isn’t enough. martin_casado and Fei-Fei Li explain why spatial intelligence is the next frontier for AI — and why mastering the physical world matters more than language alone. Listen to the full conversation from the a16z LP Summit:

a16z

134,610 次观看 • 1 年前

World Labs CEO Dr. Fei-Fei Li explains says "world model" has become an overloaded term & explains what each kind of world model does: "Right now there are three ways of calling world models when it comes to spatial intelligence." "One is what I call a renderer, when the model puts beautiful pixels on the screen." "Another kind of world model is what we call a planner. That is more for machines, more for robots." "The third kind, which I think is the linchpin of the three, is a simulator." "A simulator could become a renderer. The simulator could become a planner. But this layer is a huge critical path to unlock spatial intelligence. And that's what World Labs is working on." Fei-Fei Li at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang
2:08

World Labs CEO Dr. Fei-Fei Li explains says "world model" has become an overloaded term & explains what each kind of world model does: "Right now there are three ways of calling world models when it comes to spatial intelligence." "One is what I call a renderer, when the model puts beautiful pixels on the screen." "Another kind of world model is what we call a planner. That is more for machines, more for robots." "The third kind, which I think is the linchpin of the three, is a simulator." "A simulator could become a renderer. The simulator could become a planner. But this layer is a huge critical path to unlock spatial intelligence. And that's what World Labs is working on." Fei-Fei Li at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang

a16z

111,978 次观看 • 1 个月前

Yann LeCun just exposed AI’s fundamental flaw. We’re celebrating systems that can’t do what insects do effortlessly. LeCun: “The biggest difficulty is not to get fooled into thinking that a computer system is intelligent simply because it can manipulate language.” Language feels like intelligence because we experience it as the highest form of human thought. So when a machine produces fluent, articulate, convincing text, the instinct is to conclude it understands. It doesn’t. LeCun: “It turns out the real world is much, much more complicated.” Language is actually the easy part. A sequence of discrete symbols with a finite number of possibilities. Predicting the next word is a tractable mathematical problem. Impressive at scale. Not understanding. Pattern matching in symbol space. The real world is something else entirely. A high-dimensional, continuous, noisy signal that changes every millisecond in ways no text corpus can capture. Physical reality doesn’t come in tokens. LeCun: “Which your house cat is perfectly able to deal with. But not computers yet.” This is the Moravec paradox. The things that feel hard to humans: writing essays, solving equations, passing bar exams. Computationally straightforward. The things that feel trivially easy: walking across a room, catching a falling object, folding a shirt. Extraordinarily difficult for machines. Your house cat navigates a complex three-dimensional physical environment in real time. Predicts trajectories. Adjusts to surprises. Understands cause and effect through direct interaction with the world. The most powerful AI systems ever built cannot do what your cat does before breakfast. That’s not a minor gap. That’s the entire frontier. Language is the easy problem that looks hard to humans. The physical world is the hard problem that looks easy because evolution solved it billions of years ago. We’re pouring hundreds of billions into making language models marginally better at the simple problem. The actual intelligence problem remains unsolved. LeCun has spent fifteen years on this. Not making chatbots more fluent. Giving machines the ability to understand, predict, and interact with physical reality the way animals do instinctively. The benchmark that matters isn’t passing a bar exam. It’s folding a shirt. Loading a dishwasher. Navigating an unfamiliar room without a map. We built systems that can write your dissertation before we built systems that can tie your shoes. That’s where AI actually is. Everything else is autocomplete at scale.
1:12

Yann LeCun just exposed AI’s fundamental flaw. We’re celebrating systems that can’t do what insects do effortlessly. LeCun: “The biggest difficulty is not to get fooled into thinking that a computer system is intelligent simply because it can manipulate language.” Language feels like intelligence because we experience it as the highest form of human thought. So when a machine produces fluent, articulate, convincing text, the instinct is to conclude it understands. It doesn’t. LeCun: “It turns out the real world is much, much more complicated.” Language is actually the easy part. A sequence of discrete symbols with a finite number of possibilities. Predicting the next word is a tractable mathematical problem. Impressive at scale. Not understanding. Pattern matching in symbol space. The real world is something else entirely. A high-dimensional, continuous, noisy signal that changes every millisecond in ways no text corpus can capture. Physical reality doesn’t come in tokens. LeCun: “Which your house cat is perfectly able to deal with. But not computers yet.” This is the Moravec paradox. The things that feel hard to humans: writing essays, solving equations, passing bar exams. Computationally straightforward. The things that feel trivially easy: walking across a room, catching a falling object, folding a shirt. Extraordinarily difficult for machines. Your house cat navigates a complex three-dimensional physical environment in real time. Predicts trajectories. Adjusts to surprises. Understands cause and effect through direct interaction with the world. The most powerful AI systems ever built cannot do what your cat does before breakfast. That’s not a minor gap. That’s the entire frontier. Language is the easy problem that looks hard to humans. The physical world is the hard problem that looks easy because evolution solved it billions of years ago. We’re pouring hundreds of billions into making language models marginally better at the simple problem. The actual intelligence problem remains unsolved. LeCun has spent fifteen years on this. Not making chatbots more fluent. Giving machines the ability to understand, predict, and interact with physical reality the way animals do instinctively. The benchmark that matters isn’t passing a bar exam. It’s folding a shirt. Loading a dishwasher. Navigating an unfamiliar room without a map. We built systems that can write your dissertation before we built systems that can tie your shoes. That’s where AI actually is. Everything else is autocomplete at scale.

Dustin

284,224 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li) is known as the “godmother of AI.” For the past two decades, she’s been at the center of AI’s most significant breakthroughs, including: - Spearheading ImageNet, the dataset that sparked the AI explosion we’re living through right now. - Leading work at Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL) - Serving as Chief Scientist of AI/ML at Google Cloud - Co-founding Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI - Serving on the United Nations AI Scientific Advisory Board - Being named as Time's 100 most influential people in AI In this conversation, Fei-Fei shares the rarely told history of how we got to today—and what comes next. We discuss: 🔸 The backstory on ImageNet 🔸 Why robotics faces unique challenges compared with language models and what’s needed to overcome them 🔸 Why Fei-Fei believes AI won’t replace humans but will require us to take responsibility for ourselves 🔸 Why world models and spatial intelligence represent the next frontier in AI, beyond large language models 🔸 The surprising applications of Marble, from movie production to psychological research 🔸 How to participate in AI regardless of your role 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: 🏆 Justworks — The all-in-one HR solution for managing your small business with confidence: 🏆 Sinch — Build messaging, email, and calling into your product:
1:40

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li) is known as the “godmother of AI.” For the past two decades, she’s been at the center of AI’s most significant breakthroughs, including: - Spearheading ImageNet, the dataset that sparked the AI explosion we’re living through right now. - Leading work at Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL) - Serving as Chief Scientist of AI/ML at Google Cloud - Co-founding Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI - Serving on the United Nations AI Scientific Advisory Board - Being named as Time's 100 most influential people in AI In this conversation, Fei-Fei shares the rarely told history of how we got to today—and what comes next. We discuss: 🔸 The backstory on ImageNet 🔸 Why robotics faces unique challenges compared with language models and what’s needed to overcome them 🔸 Why Fei-Fei believes AI won’t replace humans but will require us to take responsibility for ourselves 🔸 Why world models and spatial intelligence represent the next frontier in AI, beyond large language models 🔸 The surprising applications of Marble, from movie production to psychological research 🔸 How to participate in AI regardless of your role 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: 🏆 Justworks — The all-in-one HR solution for managing your small business with confidence: 🏆 Sinch — Build messaging, email, and calling into your product:

Lenny Rachitsky

250,455 次观看 • 8 个月前

The man who INVENTED modern AI just made a billion dollar bet that ChatGPT, Claude, and every AI company on earth is building the wrong technology. Yann LeCun won the Turing Award in 2018 for creating the neural networks that made AI possible. He spent a decade running AI research at Meta. Oversaw the creation of Llama and PyTorch, the tools that half the AI industry runs on. Then he quit. And raised $1.03 billion in a seed round. The LARGEST seed round in European history. $3.5 billion valuation before generating a single dollar of revenue. Bezos wrote the check. So did Nvidia. Samsung. Toyota. Temasek. Eric Schmidt. Mark Cuban. Tim Berners-Lee (the guy who invented the internet). His new company is called AMI Labs. And it's built on one thesis: Every AI company spending billions on large language models is wasting their money. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok. They all work the same way. They predict the next word in a sequence. See "the cat sat on the" and predict "mat." Scale that to trillions of words and you get something that sounds intelligent. But LeCun says it doesn't UNDERSTAND anything. It can't reason. It can't plan. It can't predict what happens when you push a glass off a table. A two year old can do that. GPT-5 cannot. That's why AI hallucinates. It doesn't have a model of how the world actually works. It just predicts words. His solution? Something called JEPA. Instead of predicting words, it learns how the PHYSICAL WORLD works. Abstract representations of reality. Not language but physics. Think about what that means. Current AI can write your emails. LeCun's AI could design a car, run a factory, operate a robot, or diagnose a patient without hallucinating and killing someone. The CEO of AMI said it perfectly: "Factories, hospitals, and robots need AI that grasps reality. Predicting tokens doesn't cut it." And here's what's really crazy to me... LeCun isn't some outsider throwing rocks. He literally built the foundations that ChatGPT runs on. He knows exactly how these systems work because he helped create them. And after watching the entire industry sprint in one direction for three years, he raised a billion dollars to run the OPPOSITE way. No product. No revenue. No timeline. Just pure research. He told investors it could take YEARS to produce anything commercial. But they funded it anyway in just four months. Meanwhile OpenAI just raised $120 billion and still can't stop their models from making things up. Anthropic is building AI so dangerous they're afraid to release it. Google is burning billions trying to catch up. And the guy who started it all says they're all solving the wrong problem. Two Turing Award winners raised $2 billion in three weeks betting AGAINST the entire LLM approach. LeCun at AMI. Fei-Fei Li at World Labs. The smartest people in AI are quietly building the exit from the technology everyone else is betting their future on. Either they're wrong and the trillion dollar LLM industry keeps printing. Or they're right and every AI company on earth just built on a foundation that's about to crack.
1:35

The man who INVENTED modern AI just made a billion dollar bet that ChatGPT, Claude, and every AI company on earth is building the wrong technology. Yann LeCun won the Turing Award in 2018 for creating the neural networks that made AI possible. He spent a decade running AI research at Meta. Oversaw the creation of Llama and PyTorch, the tools that half the AI industry runs on. Then he quit. And raised $1.03 billion in a seed round. The LARGEST seed round in European history. $3.5 billion valuation before generating a single dollar of revenue. Bezos wrote the check. So did Nvidia. Samsung. Toyota. Temasek. Eric Schmidt. Mark Cuban. Tim Berners-Lee (the guy who invented the internet). His new company is called AMI Labs. And it's built on one thesis: Every AI company spending billions on large language models is wasting their money. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok. They all work the same way. They predict the next word in a sequence. See "the cat sat on the" and predict "mat." Scale that to trillions of words and you get something that sounds intelligent. But LeCun says it doesn't UNDERSTAND anything. It can't reason. It can't plan. It can't predict what happens when you push a glass off a table. A two year old can do that. GPT-5 cannot. That's why AI hallucinates. It doesn't have a model of how the world actually works. It just predicts words. His solution? Something called JEPA. Instead of predicting words, it learns how the PHYSICAL WORLD works. Abstract representations of reality. Not language but physics. Think about what that means. Current AI can write your emails. LeCun's AI could design a car, run a factory, operate a robot, or diagnose a patient without hallucinating and killing someone. The CEO of AMI said it perfectly: "Factories, hospitals, and robots need AI that grasps reality. Predicting tokens doesn't cut it." And here's what's really crazy to me... LeCun isn't some outsider throwing rocks. He literally built the foundations that ChatGPT runs on. He knows exactly how these systems work because he helped create them. And after watching the entire industry sprint in one direction for three years, he raised a billion dollars to run the OPPOSITE way. No product. No revenue. No timeline. Just pure research. He told investors it could take YEARS to produce anything commercial. But they funded it anyway in just four months. Meanwhile OpenAI just raised $120 billion and still can't stop their models from making things up. Anthropic is building AI so dangerous they're afraid to release it. Google is burning billions trying to catch up. And the guy who started it all says they're all solving the wrong problem. Two Turing Award winners raised $2 billion in three weeks betting AGAINST the entire LLM approach. LeCun at AMI. Fei-Fei Li at World Labs. The smartest people in AI are quietly building the exit from the technology everyone else is betting their future on. Either they're wrong and the trillion dollar LLM industry keeps printing. Or they're right and every AI company on earth just built on a foundation that's about to crack.

Ricardo

605,827 次观看 • 3 个月前

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang just gave us a glimpse into the future of AI, and it's far bigger than text and images. He asked: "If you can understand worlds, is it possible that you understand proteins and chemicals that have structure?” This is the quiet revolution happening in AI right now. We're moving from an AI that understands human language to an AI that understands the language of nature itself. The "letters" are atoms. The "words" are molecules. The "sentences" are the complex structures of life, networks, and reality. The same foundational models that generate video are now being used to: *Decode proteins to fight disease *Design new materials at the atomic level *Simulate complex systems in quantum computing These were once the domain of supercomputers and Nobel laureates. Now, they're becoming solvable problems for a new generation of startups. AI is transitioning from a tool for communication to a tool for creation and discovery in the physical world. This is where the next wave of generational companies will be built. The "hard-to-solve" problems are now within reach.
2:14

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang just gave us a glimpse into the future of AI, and it's far bigger than text and images. He asked: "If you can understand worlds, is it possible that you understand proteins and chemicals that have structure?” This is the quiet revolution happening in AI right now. We're moving from an AI that understands human language to an AI that understands the language of nature itself. The "letters" are atoms. The "words" are molecules. The "sentences" are the complex structures of life, networks, and reality. The same foundational models that generate video are now being used to: *Decode proteins to fight disease *Design new materials at the atomic level *Simulate complex systems in quantum computing These were once the domain of supercomputers and Nobel laureates. Now, they're becoming solvable problems for a new generation of startups. AI is transitioning from a tool for communication to a tool for creation and discovery in the physical world. This is where the next wave of generational companies will be built. The "hard-to-solve" problems are now within reach.

Konstantine Buhler

13,014 次观看 • 9 个月前

[1/16] The real world is large, and we want our AI models to operate on the scale of reality. Over the past two years, my colleagues and I have developed fVDB, a deep learning framework for large-scale, high performance spatial intelligence. We finally announced this work at SIGGRAPH and have released the framework in early access. Here’s a small tour of what fVDB is, and what we’ve used it to do.
3:19

[1/16] The real world is large, and we want our AI models to operate on the scale of reality. Over the past two years, my colleagues and I have developed fVDB, a deep learning framework for large-scale, high performance spatial intelligence. We finally announced this work at SIGGRAPH and have released the framework in early access. Here’s a small tour of what fVDB is, and what we’ve used it to do.

Francis Williams

33,898 次观看 • 1 年前

AI is shifting from simple language models to sophisticated agents that actually get things done. Case in point: XBOW, founded by Oege de Moor, has built an AI that doesn't just suggest how to spot cybersecurity threats – it actively tests and validates them. In under a year, they've created technology that can match expert human performance. This is what real AI progress looks like.
1:52

AI is shifting from simple language models to sophisticated agents that actually get things done. Case in point: XBOW, founded by Oege de Moor, has built an AI that doesn't just suggest how to spot cybersecurity threats – it actively tests and validates them. In under a year, they've created technology that can match expert human performance. This is what real AI progress looks like.

Konstantine Buhler

33,017 次观看 • 1 年前

The next AI revolution is not just happening on screens. It is happening in the physical world. Robots, drones, autonomous vehicles, and smart machines all need one thing before they can operate safely: Precise location. Traditional GPS can be off by several meters. For humans, that may be fine. For autonomous machines, it can be dangerous. GEODNET is building the spatial intelligence layer for Physical AI, using RTK positioning to improve accuracy from meters to within one centimeter. Over 20,000 base stations. 170+ countries. 11,000+ cities. 130+ enterprise customers. Physical AI needs real-world infrastructure. That infrastructure is being built now.
1:56

The next AI revolution is not just happening on screens. It is happening in the physical world. Robots, drones, autonomous vehicles, and smart machines all need one thing before they can operate safely: Precise location. Traditional GPS can be off by several meters. For humans, that may be fine. For autonomous machines, it can be dangerous. GEODNET is building the spatial intelligence layer for Physical AI, using RTK positioning to improve accuracy from meters to within one centimeter. Over 20,000 base stations. 170+ countries. 11,000+ cities. 130+ enterprise customers. Physical AI needs real-world infrastructure. That infrastructure is being built now.

GEODNET

138,794 次观看 • 24 天前

The godmother of AI just delivered the reality check Silicon Valley refuses to hear. She has the standing to say it. Li: “Silicon Valley as a whole tends to mistake clear vision with short distance.” Seeing the destination clearly has nothing to do with how hard it is to reach. Self-driving cars were first demonstrated in 2006. Twenty years later Waymo is barely on the road. The vision was never the problem. The distance was. Clarity of destination gets mistaken for proximity to arrival. That’s the mistake the industry keeps making. And keeps making. Li: “I consider myself a scientist in my heart and I actually really don’t like hyping.” In an industry running at maximum temperature, Fei-Fei Li is one of the few people at the top willing to say that publicly. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the gap between what’s visible and what’s required is being systematically underestimated. Large Language Models dominate the conversation. Text to text. Comparatively contained. The harder problem is spatial intelligence. AI that reasons about and acts within the physical three-dimensional world. Hardware. Physics. Data that doesn’t exist yet. Real-time adaptation to chaos. A robot that can clean a bathroom requires understanding every surface, every object, every force, every exception. That’s not a software update. That’s a civilizational research problem. Li: “I don’t call it hype. I call it a misleading sentiment. We don’t want to replace human creators.” The second place the industry gets it wrong is creativity. The narrative has hardened around replacement. AI takes the jobs. AI tells the stories. AI makes the art. Li considers that not just wrong but destructive. Wrong because AI doesn’t replicate creativity. Destructive because believing it can devalues the humans creating culture. Human creativity isn’t a process to be automated. It’s fundamental to what we are as a species. The goal is augmentation. Tools that make human creators faster and more capable. Not systems that generate output in the style of human work and call it creation. That distinction matters more than most people in the industry are willing to sit with. Precision of imagination is not proximity to reality. Li has spent her career in the gap between those two things. The map isn’t the territory. The journey is long. The hurdles are deep. And the scientist who built the foundation this era stands on is telling you the timeline everyone is selling is wrong. We’ve been almost there with self-driving for twenty years. The pattern doesn’t change just because the destination looks different.
3:06

The godmother of AI just delivered the reality check Silicon Valley refuses to hear. She has the standing to say it. Li: “Silicon Valley as a whole tends to mistake clear vision with short distance.” Seeing the destination clearly has nothing to do with how hard it is to reach. Self-driving cars were first demonstrated in 2006. Twenty years later Waymo is barely on the road. The vision was never the problem. The distance was. Clarity of destination gets mistaken for proximity to arrival. That’s the mistake the industry keeps making. And keeps making. Li: “I consider myself a scientist in my heart and I actually really don’t like hyping.” In an industry running at maximum temperature, Fei-Fei Li is one of the few people at the top willing to say that publicly. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the gap between what’s visible and what’s required is being systematically underestimated. Large Language Models dominate the conversation. Text to text. Comparatively contained. The harder problem is spatial intelligence. AI that reasons about and acts within the physical three-dimensional world. Hardware. Physics. Data that doesn’t exist yet. Real-time adaptation to chaos. A robot that can clean a bathroom requires understanding every surface, every object, every force, every exception. That’s not a software update. That’s a civilizational research problem. Li: “I don’t call it hype. I call it a misleading sentiment. We don’t want to replace human creators.” The second place the industry gets it wrong is creativity. The narrative has hardened around replacement. AI takes the jobs. AI tells the stories. AI makes the art. Li considers that not just wrong but destructive. Wrong because AI doesn’t replicate creativity. Destructive because believing it can devalues the humans creating culture. Human creativity isn’t a process to be automated. It’s fundamental to what we are as a species. The goal is augmentation. Tools that make human creators faster and more capable. Not systems that generate output in the style of human work and call it creation. That distinction matters more than most people in the industry are willing to sit with. Precision of imagination is not proximity to reality. Li has spent her career in the gap between those two things. The map isn’t the territory. The journey is long. The hurdles are deep. And the scientist who built the foundation this era stands on is telling you the timeline everyone is selling is wrong. We’ve been almost there with self-driving for twenty years. The pattern doesn’t change just because the destination looks different.

Dustin

260,407 次观看 • 4 个月前

Without World Models, There Is No AGI. Google Just Proved It. If AGI ever happens, it will not come from bigger chatbots alone. From the very start of this interview, one thing is crystal clear: without world models, we will never reach AGI. And right now, Google is leading with its world simulator Genie 3. Here is the core of what Demis Hassabis explains in this conversation: • World models are the missing core of AGI Hassabis says his deepest long term focus has always been world models and simulations. Not just language. Not just prediction. Actual internal simulations of reality. • LLMs are impressive, but incomplete Language models understand more about the world than expected because human language encodes a lot of reality. Still, language is only a shadow of the real thing. • What text can never fully teach Reality includes things text struggles to express: •3D space and spatial dynamics •Physical causality and mechanics •Sensorimotor experience like movement, force, smell, or balance • Experience beats description To close the gap, AI must learn from interaction and experience, not just static text. That is how you build an internal world simulator. • Why Genie 3 matters With Google DeepMind pushing systems like Genie 3, AI starts to model reality itself, not just talk about it. • Robots and real world assistants depend on this True robotics, smart glasses, and universal assistants require AI that understands the physical world you live in, not just your screen. Bottom line: AGI will not emerge from better text prediction. It will emerge from systems that can simulate, predict, and understand reality itself. Right now, Google is clearly ahead on that path. Curious what you think. Are world models the real AGI unlock, or just another stepping stone?
1:26

Without World Models, There Is No AGI. Google Just Proved It. If AGI ever happens, it will not come from bigger chatbots alone. From the very start of this interview, one thing is crystal clear: without world models, we will never reach AGI. And right now, Google is leading with its world simulator Genie 3. Here is the core of what Demis Hassabis explains in this conversation: • World models are the missing core of AGI Hassabis says his deepest long term focus has always been world models and simulations. Not just language. Not just prediction. Actual internal simulations of reality. • LLMs are impressive, but incomplete Language models understand more about the world than expected because human language encodes a lot of reality. Still, language is only a shadow of the real thing. • What text can never fully teach Reality includes things text struggles to express: •3D space and spatial dynamics •Physical causality and mechanics •Sensorimotor experience like movement, force, smell, or balance • Experience beats description To close the gap, AI must learn from interaction and experience, not just static text. That is how you build an internal world simulator. • Why Genie 3 matters With Google DeepMind pushing systems like Genie 3, AI starts to model reality itself, not just talk about it. • Robots and real world assistants depend on this True robotics, smart glasses, and universal assistants require AI that understands the physical world you live in, not just your screen. Bottom line: AGI will not emerge from better text prediction. It will emerge from systems that can simulate, predict, and understand reality itself. Right now, Google is clearly ahead on that path. Curious what you think. Are world models the real AGI unlock, or just another stepping stone?

VraserX e/acc

23,784 次观看 • 6 个月前

AI can write you a poem. It can build a website. It can plan a trip. But it can't tap a button on your phone. That's what makes the boring work boring. Nobody's solved it. Until now. Airtap Ai is the AI that finally taps the buttons. You teach it a routine one time. It runs that routine every day for you.
1:16

AI can write you a poem. It can build a website. It can plan a trip. But it can't tap a button on your phone. That's what makes the boring work boring. Nobody's solved it. Until now. Airtap Ai is the AI that finally taps the buttons. You teach it a routine one time. It runs that routine every day for you.

Md Santo

182,891 次观看 • 1 个月前

📁 Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, says you cannot understand the world by reading about it. All the text on the internet is around 30 trillion words, it would take a human half a million years to read it. A four year old absorbs more raw information just by looking at the world. Intelligence is not trained by text alone, it is shaped by experience.
1:25

📁 Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, says you cannot understand the world by reading about it. All the text on the internet is around 30 trillion words, it would take a human half a million years to read it. A four year old absorbs more raw information just by looking at the world. Intelligence is not trained by text alone, it is shaped by experience.

Jon Hernandez

15,342 次观看 • 5 个月前

Demis Hassabis on the limit in today’s AI: language can describe the world, but it cannot contain it - and why "World Models" are his "longest standing passion". Language models absorbed far more structure about reality from text than many researchers expected, because human language quietly carries physics, psychology, culture, tools, plans, and cause-and-effect. But text is still a compressed residue of experience, not experience itself. A sentence can say a cup falls from a table, yet it does not fully encode weight, grip, balance, friction, timing, sound, surprise, or the tiny motor corrections a body makes before it even notices them. The world is not only made of facts that can be named; it is made of constraints that have to be lived through, touched, predicted, violated, and repaired. That is why world models matter. They aim to learn the hidden grammar of physical reality: how objects persist, how forces unfold, how space changes when an agent moves, and how action creates feedback. Language models can often reason about the world because people have written so much about it. World models try to learn what the world is like before it becomes words. The difference is exactly what matters because intelligence is not just answering well; it is knowing what would happen next if you moved, reached, pushed, smelled, slipped, or failed. A mind trained only on descriptions may become brilliant at explanation. A mind trained on experience may become better at consequence. --- Full video from "Google DeepMind" and "Hannah Fry" YT channel (link in comment)
1:37

Demis Hassabis on the limit in today’s AI: language can describe the world, but it cannot contain it - and why "World Models" are his "longest standing passion". Language models absorbed far more structure about reality from text than many researchers expected, because human language quietly carries physics, psychology, culture, tools, plans, and cause-and-effect. But text is still a compressed residue of experience, not experience itself. A sentence can say a cup falls from a table, yet it does not fully encode weight, grip, balance, friction, timing, sound, surprise, or the tiny motor corrections a body makes before it even notices them. The world is not only made of facts that can be named; it is made of constraints that have to be lived through, touched, predicted, violated, and repaired. That is why world models matter. They aim to learn the hidden grammar of physical reality: how objects persist, how forces unfold, how space changes when an agent moves, and how action creates feedback. Language models can often reason about the world because people have written so much about it. World models try to learn what the world is like before it becomes words. The difference is exactly what matters because intelligence is not just answering well; it is knowing what would happen next if you moved, reached, pushed, smelled, slipped, or failed. A mind trained only on descriptions may become brilliant at explanation. A mind trained on experience may become better at consequence. --- Full video from "Google DeepMind" and "Hannah Fry" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

49,938 次观看 • 1 个月前