Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Chilling Peter Thiel Clip Explains How He Is Trying To DESTROY Democracy Forever "We could never win an election because we were in such a minority", Thiel said at an event in 2010, explaining that technology like Paypal and Palantir are designed to "unilaterally change the world" without the...

MintPressNews's profile picture

MintPress News

289,780 subscribers

97,417 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологииФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Wall Street Apes "we could never win an election... but maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without constantly convince people... who are never going to agree with you - through technological means... Technology is this incredible alternative to politics." - Peter Thiel
0:26

Wall Street Apes "we could never win an election... but maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without constantly convince people... who are never going to agree with you - through technological means... Technology is this incredible alternative to politics." - Peter Thiel

Maria Sederholm @Wordofbeak

21,059 просмотров • 1 год назад

Thiel said this in 2010: “The basic idea was we could never win an election… because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without constantly having to convince people… through a technological means.” He must be stopped.
0:26

Thiel said this in 2010: “The basic idea was we could never win an election… because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without constantly having to convince people… through a technological means.” He must be stopped.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

1,027,345 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

How does the Antichrist operate on the physical plane? He constructs a system for usurping freewill for himself. “We could never win an election… because we were such a small minority, but maybe you could change the world unilaterally through a technological means… Technology is this incredible alternative to politics… It is not a way to fix it. It is a way to escape.” Peter Thiel has partnered with Russia, Israel, Saudi, Jeffrey Epstein, and countless fascists around the world to build this “technological means.” We are living inside it. This website is one of its biggest tools. Peter Thiel is one demented 80-year-old heartbeat from essentially being the president. James Bowman was plucked out of Yale by Peter Thiel and converted to “JD Vance” in a lab.
1:25

How does the Antichrist operate on the physical plane? He constructs a system for usurping freewill for himself. “We could never win an election… because we were such a small minority, but maybe you could change the world unilaterally through a technological means… Technology is this incredible alternative to politics… It is not a way to fix it. It is a way to escape.” Peter Thiel has partnered with Russia, Israel, Saudi, Jeffrey Epstein, and countless fascists around the world to build this “technological means.” We are living inside it. This website is one of its biggest tools. Peter Thiel is one demented 80-year-old heartbeat from essentially being the president. James Bowman was plucked out of Yale by Peter Thiel and converted to “JD Vance” in a lab.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

149,941 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel gave a speech in a Hilton in 2010 that holds the keys to unlocking the source of many of America’s most severe problems. Key quote: “The task in this world… where politics has become so broken… is to find a way to escape from it. It’s not a way to fix it.” Palantir is currently tightening its grip around all of our data. Elon Musk is diverting untold billions into a Mars fantasy. All of the anarchist, antidemocratic ideas of the PayPal Mafia and the “Dark Enlightenment”—to use technology as an “escape”—were already well in process 15 years ago. —The internet as “alternate virtual reality” so you don’t have to “constantly convince people.” This is why he funded Satoshi (Bitcoin), MAGA3X (Pizzagate, Q), and pushed Musk to buy Twitter —PayPal (now blockchain/crypto/BTC) was to “overturn the monetary system” —“Escape” now more often referred to as “exit” —“Autonomous countries” now known as the “network state” JD Vance is a full member of the cult of the broligarchs. Unfortunately, this has been a very thorough coup and they have backup. It’s worth really absorbing what the living Antichrist, Peter Thiel, is saying here: “I don't think despair is the only answer. And I don't think, and it's because I don't think politics is the only way to go. And my thinking on this, you know, started to take a turn towards a more optimistic perspective in the mid to late '90s when I got involved in the tech boom in Silicon Valley. I ended up being the co-founder of a company called PayPal where -- and the initial founding vision was that we were going to use technology to change the whole world and basically overturn on the monetary system of the world. And, you know, we can debate on how much it succeeded or how little it succeeded. And there were parts of it that I think have worked, and parts of it were, you know, the jury is still out. But the basic idea was that we could never win an election on getting certain things. Because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through a technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics. And, you know, there are a number of different technologies we can outline, but the task in this world where politics has become so broken and so dysfunctional is to find a way to escape from it. It's not a way to fix it. It is a way to escape. And there are, you know, a number of different options. I think the promising one of the 1990s and this last decade has been to escape onto the Internet and to sort of create an alternate virtual reality. Questions, of course, is still how does it intersect with the real world? There are, I think, escaping to outer space is a promise, although I think the space technology is not quite there. So I think that's sort of for the second half of the 21st century. I think we can try to, you know, create autonomous countries on oceans, underwater, all sorts of other spaces. But I think technology is the vehicle for how we should be looking to escape and move beyond politics as we find it today.”
2:09

Peter Thiel gave a speech in a Hilton in 2010 that holds the keys to unlocking the source of many of America’s most severe problems. Key quote: “The task in this world… where politics has become so broken… is to find a way to escape from it. It’s not a way to fix it.” Palantir is currently tightening its grip around all of our data. Elon Musk is diverting untold billions into a Mars fantasy. All of the anarchist, antidemocratic ideas of the PayPal Mafia and the “Dark Enlightenment”—to use technology as an “escape”—were already well in process 15 years ago. —The internet as “alternate virtual reality” so you don’t have to “constantly convince people.” This is why he funded Satoshi (Bitcoin), MAGA3X (Pizzagate, Q), and pushed Musk to buy Twitter —PayPal (now blockchain/crypto/BTC) was to “overturn the monetary system” —“Escape” now more often referred to as “exit” —“Autonomous countries” now known as the “network state” JD Vance is a full member of the cult of the broligarchs. Unfortunately, this has been a very thorough coup and they have backup. It’s worth really absorbing what the living Antichrist, Peter Thiel, is saying here: “I don't think despair is the only answer. And I don't think, and it's because I don't think politics is the only way to go. And my thinking on this, you know, started to take a turn towards a more optimistic perspective in the mid to late '90s when I got involved in the tech boom in Silicon Valley. I ended up being the co-founder of a company called PayPal where -- and the initial founding vision was that we were going to use technology to change the whole world and basically overturn on the monetary system of the world. And, you know, we can debate on how much it succeeded or how little it succeeded. And there were parts of it that I think have worked, and parts of it were, you know, the jury is still out. But the basic idea was that we could never win an election on getting certain things. Because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through a technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics. And, you know, there are a number of different technologies we can outline, but the task in this world where politics has become so broken and so dysfunctional is to find a way to escape from it. It's not a way to fix it. It is a way to escape. And there are, you know, a number of different options. I think the promising one of the 1990s and this last decade has been to escape onto the Internet and to sort of create an alternate virtual reality. Questions, of course, is still how does it intersect with the real world? There are, I think, escaping to outer space is a promise, although I think the space technology is not quite there. So I think that's sort of for the second half of the 21st century. I think we can try to, you know, create autonomous countries on oceans, underwater, all sorts of other spaces. But I think technology is the vehicle for how we should be looking to escape and move beyond politics as we find it today.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

156,800 просмотров • 1 год назад

The sad reality is the “AI industry” was infected by Peter Thiel and Elon Musk long ago. Just as they did with social media, blockchain, and every other technology they’ve touched, they turned LLMs into a weapon to benefit themselves. They funded and promoted the Rationalist/Effective Altruist doomer cult and its network of influence operations cloaked as “institutes.” They endlessly amplified the mythology of transhumanism, the “Singularity,” longtermism, and existential fear of an AI machine god. At the same time, they seeded the industry with their own protégés like Thiel’s minion Sam Altman—to try to create the existential monster they claimed to be afraid of. But why? Escape. It is no coincidence that Thiel and Musk were both brought up in apartheid. They were trained to be supremacists who think they can inflict their beliefs onto others. Thiel gave away the ballgame in 2010: “But the basic idea [of PayPal] was that we could never win an election on getting certain things. Because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through a technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics.“ The “AI industry” has not created a machine god; it has sucked trillions of dollars into a technological mechanism for the broligarchy to steal humanity’s ideas, art, labor, and resources and sell it back to us as slop. Everything the PayPal Mafia touches dies.
2:09

The sad reality is the “AI industry” was infected by Peter Thiel and Elon Musk long ago. Just as they did with social media, blockchain, and every other technology they’ve touched, they turned LLMs into a weapon to benefit themselves. They funded and promoted the Rationalist/Effective Altruist doomer cult and its network of influence operations cloaked as “institutes.” They endlessly amplified the mythology of transhumanism, the “Singularity,” longtermism, and existential fear of an AI machine god. At the same time, they seeded the industry with their own protégés like Thiel’s minion Sam Altman—to try to create the existential monster they claimed to be afraid of. But why? Escape. It is no coincidence that Thiel and Musk were both brought up in apartheid. They were trained to be supremacists who think they can inflict their beliefs onto others. Thiel gave away the ballgame in 2010: “But the basic idea [of PayPal] was that we could never win an election on getting certain things. Because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through a technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics.“ The “AI industry” has not created a machine god; it has sucked trillions of dollars into a technological mechanism for the broligarchy to steal humanity’s ideas, art, labor, and resources and sell it back to us as slop. Everything the PayPal Mafia touches dies.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

18,450 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Nick Fuentes explains the 99-to-1 rule, claiming that all you need is a small percentage of people to change the world “If we could get a large contingent of those [1% of] people and work together to level up… We change the country, and this country rules the world.”
6:11

Nick Fuentes explains the 99-to-1 rule, claiming that all you need is a small percentage of people to change the world “If we could get a large contingent of those [1% of] people and work together to level up… We change the country, and this country rules the world.”

Fuentes Updates

31,547 просмотров • 4 дней назад

PALANTIR CEO ALEX KARP: “The Palantir Platform, despite what you may read at The New York Times, is actually the most secure, the hardest platform in the world to manipulate and change. Of course any technology can be abused. But if you wanted to abuse a technology, if you wanted to use the deep state to unlawfully surveil people, the last platform in the world you would pick is Palantir because of the granular way we segment and put together and the security models and the access control models that are in Foundry natively.”
0:35

PALANTIR CEO ALEX KARP: “The Palantir Platform, despite what you may read at The New York Times, is actually the most secure, the hardest platform in the world to manipulate and change. Of course any technology can be abused. But if you wanted to abuse a technology, if you wanted to use the deep state to unlawfully surveil people, the last platform in the world you would pick is Palantir because of the granular way we segment and put together and the security models and the access control models that are in Foundry natively.”

amit

259,088 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”
1:27

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Behind the products we use every day is a world of logistics. Our people and technology help businesses get their products where they need to be. We move the world to change what’s possible:
1:00

Behind the products we use every day is a world of logistics. Our people and technology help businesses get their products where they need to be. We move the world to change what’s possible:

DP World

30,616 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

WILL CALIFORNIA BRING DOWN THE HOUSE⁉️ We were told to watch California. Well, now the world is watching. Trump and the military needed a recognizable, likeable candidate, who could win the hearts of liberals, and they found that with Spencer Pratt. All eyes are now on the rigged election in California and everyone sees it. People who never gave a crap before are watching what they are doing to their boy Spencer Pratt. And now President Trump is going to destroy them. People needed to be shown, not told.
2:06

WILL CALIFORNIA BRING DOWN THE HOUSE⁉️ We were told to watch California. Well, now the world is watching. Trump and the military needed a recognizable, likeable candidate, who could win the hearts of liberals, and they found that with Spencer Pratt. All eyes are now on the rigged election in California and everyone sees it. People who never gave a crap before are watching what they are doing to their boy Spencer Pratt. And now President Trump is going to destroy them. People needed to be shown, not told.

RealAF Patriot

56,738 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Ben Horowitz on the necessity of American Dynamism at the dawn of the AI revolution: "There's really been no country in the world that comes close to America at giving people a shot." "When people have a chance to contribute, then they can have an impact. Then they can advance the state of things for everybody." "We won the industrial revolution, and we did that because we had superior technology." "And here we are on the dawn of a new technological revolution, the AI revolution." "Are we going to be able to give people a shot, and continue to advance humanity?" "I think that's an open question right now." benahorowitz.eth
2:00

Ben Horowitz on the necessity of American Dynamism at the dawn of the AI revolution: "There's really been no country in the world that comes close to America at giving people a shot." "When people have a chance to contribute, then they can have an impact. Then they can advance the state of things for everybody." "We won the industrial revolution, and we did that because we had superior technology." "And here we are on the dawn of a new technological revolution, the AI revolution." "Are we going to be able to give people a shot, and continue to advance humanity?" "I think that's an open question right now." benahorowitz.eth

David Ulevitch 🇺🇸

25,492 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

APC Did Everything Humanly Possible to Win Osun — Aliyu We did our best. We did everything we thought was enough to win the 2026 Osun governorship election. The people of Osun decided they wanted the Accord Party, and that is the beauty of democracy. I congratulate them. There was a lot of internal wrangling in the APC in Osun State in the buildup to the election. Some people were not happy with our candidate. If we could have done anything differently, maybe that is the area to look at, because the APC defeated itself in Osun State. Farouk Aliyu, APC Chieftain
1:14

APC Did Everything Humanly Possible to Win Osun — Aliyu We did our best. We did everything we thought was enough to win the 2026 Osun governorship election. The people of Osun decided they wanted the Accord Party, and that is the beauty of democracy. I congratulate them. There was a lot of internal wrangling in the APC in Osun State in the buildup to the election. Some people were not happy with our candidate. If we could have done anything differently, maybe that is the area to look at, because the APC defeated itself in Osun State. Farouk Aliyu, APC Chieftain

ARISE NEWS

72,089 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We have to get SERIOUS and vote Democrat in 2026 so we can WIN the 2028 primary “Democrats having oversight power... is going to seriously wound everybody in this administration, and that is GOOD because those are the people that were are going to FIGHT in the 2028 primary.”
6:01

We have to get SERIOUS and vote Democrat in 2026 so we can WIN the 2028 primary “Democrats having oversight power... is going to seriously wound everybody in this administration, and that is GOOD because those are the people that were are going to FIGHT in the 2028 primary.”

Fuentes Updates

13,679 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🔥“We didn’t win World War II because we said the right things. We did it because we had a powerful home that allowed us to project power abroad. The problem in the world right now is that we are weak at home and people are taking advantage of that.” - Senator @JDVance1
0:55

🔥“We didn’t win World War II because we said the right things. We did it because we had a powerful home that allowed us to project power abroad. The problem in the world right now is that we are weak at home and people are taking advantage of that.” - Senator @JDVance1

Senator Vance Press Office

21,224 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).
3:44

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Brian Solis

113,733 просмотров • 3 лет назад

IN ZIMBABWE YOU MUST KNOW, WHAT IS PROGRESSIVE IS ZANUPF AND THEY ARE OUR ALLIES, SAYS ANC - African National Congress "We might have problems with ZanuPF, but in Zimbabwe you must know, what is progressive and our allies is ZanuPF. And reactionaries do not want to us to say that. Nelson Chamisa and his allies are our allies. Our allies. They don't speak our language. They are not with us in this new world agenda of the alternative multipolar world we want to build, they're not with us. They're with the neoliberals, and the liberal agenda in the world. As the ANC we don't subscribe to that. We are anti-imperialists. So any political party that perpetuates the entrenchment of neocolonialism and imperialism is not our allies. Our allies can be committing blunders, including the former liberation movements, but they remain our allies... You know if we were to lose power Comrades, we will never comeback easily because development and boom of this economy is coming. And those who will win, they will look like they're nice guys who are understand where this country is going, yet it would have been due to the work done by the ANC. It's easy for anyone to open their mouths and criticise because that's what you suffer as an incumbent. Your task as an incumbent is to stay true to what you're supposed to do. That's why as I conclude, we must never be tolerant of people who are not doing the right things" ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula Spot on Cde SG. Reactionaries and running dogs of imperialism who call themselves change champions do not understand that the change they purport to seek is not the transformational change that is needed. Amandla!
1:58

IN ZIMBABWE YOU MUST KNOW, WHAT IS PROGRESSIVE IS ZANUPF AND THEY ARE OUR ALLIES, SAYS ANC - African National Congress "We might have problems with ZanuPF, but in Zimbabwe you must know, what is progressive and our allies is ZanuPF. And reactionaries do not want to us to say that. Nelson Chamisa and his allies are our allies. Our allies. They don't speak our language. They are not with us in this new world agenda of the alternative multipolar world we want to build, they're not with us. They're with the neoliberals, and the liberal agenda in the world. As the ANC we don't subscribe to that. We are anti-imperialists. So any political party that perpetuates the entrenchment of neocolonialism and imperialism is not our allies. Our allies can be committing blunders, including the former liberation movements, but they remain our allies... You know if we were to lose power Comrades, we will never comeback easily because development and boom of this economy is coming. And those who will win, they will look like they're nice guys who are understand where this country is going, yet it would have been due to the work done by the ANC. It's easy for anyone to open their mouths and criticise because that's what you suffer as an incumbent. Your task as an incumbent is to stay true to what you're supposed to do. That's why as I conclude, we must never be tolerant of people who are not doing the right things" ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula Spot on Cde SG. Reactionaries and running dogs of imperialism who call themselves change champions do not understand that the change they purport to seek is not the transformational change that is needed. Amandla!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

356,532 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."
1:18

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

Bridgett Fertig

56,044 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it.
1:18

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it.

Bridgett Fertig

25,363 просмотров • 1 месяц назад