Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

China is running the Ronald Reagan strategy… which pushed the Soviet Union over the edge of bankruptcy.

40,683 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

40 Comments

San Miguel 🗡️'s profile picture
San Miguel 🗡️1 month ago

Doggy is just full Autistic Ching Chong 😂😂😂

Imperial Standard's profile picture
Imperial Standard1 month ago

Doggy, your pet*rdo truly a t*rd of gigantic proportions... after comparing US GDP with China PPP, he implies he doesn't understand the concept of infra debt that services its own debts thinking all debts are the same like those born of wypeepo financial magick LMAO

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

Who?

Imperial Standard's profile picture
Imperial Standard1 month ago

*San Miguel". His intelligence insults his namesake LMAO

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

Oh… he’s too retarded to survive this world

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

soviet union lost due to consumer goods,while their military production was better than west.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

The US can produce neither consumer goods nor weaponry. 😐

deutschina's profile picture
deutschina1 month ago

That's not entirely true. If you look back at the cold war, the US and the Soviet Union spent a much higher percentage of their GDP on military. Right now, China's military spending is only ca. 1.3%-1.5% of GDP. So we're not in an arms race with anyone.

Make Europe great again ☦️'s profile picture
Make Europe great again ☦️1 month ago

America didn't do shit

No Filter Thoughts's profile picture
No Filter Thoughts1 month ago

Also, data centers. The "AI race" has made the US dump shitloads of money it doesn't have into useless data centers. Total resource misallocation which has fucked up the US economy & manufacturing base even worse than before.

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

western propaganda was nice to insanity called civilian life in soviet union.,while completelly clueless about their military strenght.

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

have you ever been to soviet union,shitshow of epic proportions.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

No. But I have lived in America for decades.

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

command economy is crazy great for military,but absolutelly atrocius for civilian life.ask chinese.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

I’m Chinese.

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

are you slow.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

I am brilliant

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

im praising your country.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

China has a quasi command economy

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

ok be stubborn.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

I am brilliant

zaharieshah's profile picture
zaharieshah1 month ago

Ngl USA was better when defence spending was 5% of gdp

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

Oh it has always been +5%. Half of US GDP is phony.

Beckton Peddy's profile picture
Beckton Peddy1 month ago

If you actually believe that the Chinese only spend $350mil on defense yearly, I have a bridge to sell to you

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

This is SIPRI data and generally accepted consensus. China’s hardware procurement far surpasses the US spending +$1T. But that’s ballpark China’s cost advantage in manufacturing (i.e. cars, ships, construction machinery etc). So yes, $350m is correct. Noob

Beckton Peddy's profile picture
Beckton Peddy1 month ago

To be clear I'm not at all defending the US military contracting system, despite building some nice high-end hardware, it's really a disaster and wastes a lot of $$. But I wish people would understand that the spending gap is way smaller than is touted You're correct that China has a pretty huge cost advantage in manufacturing. Which is why it makes the comparison even more unfavorable once you count all the "grey" dollars in, so their actual nominal spend is $450M, which becomes $700 if you adjust for that/PPP. SIPRI is not a good source for China due to what makes them a great source on all other countries, their caution. They themselves note that they don't include almost any dual-use tech, (which China uses a ton of militarily). They don't account for China's "creative" accounting due to them trying to be consistent across countries, which doesn't work when one country does this totally abnormally.

Peter Gregor's profile picture
Peter Gregor1 month ago

Nonsense. Show military spending as % of GDP. Oh… that wouldn’t fit, would it?

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

Defense spending is ~25% of US industrial output. It’s ~4% in China. Jess saying. 😐

Peter Gregor's profile picture
Peter Gregor1 month ago

Comparison with the Soviet Union is still missing.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

It’s rhyming bro

Peter Gregor's profile picture
Peter Gregor1 month ago

Prove it. Otherwise, you’re just talking out of thin air.

PeterSullivanish's profile picture
PeterSullivanish1 month ago

@Bluebearmonkey DOD, war on Iran plus the department of VA together is about 6% of the US GDP. Under Gorbachev, right before the Soviet collapse, depending on how they did their accounting, the USSR was spending between 5-9% of its GDP on defense.

Peter Gregor's profile picture
Peter Gregor1 month ago

@Bluebearmonkey The idea that the USSR went bankrupt because it couldn’t keep up with the arms race is a blatant myth.

Blue Bear's profile picture
Blue Bear1 month ago

@SpaceGrenadier Well it certainly didn’t help. Money is fungible, bro. Which ruble exactly pushed it over the edge?

Materials Science's profile picture
Materials Science1 month ago

It didn't though

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

lets say war breaks out,first thing i would do is beat everybody like apumpkin and turn europe in total command economy just running over is not about fukin marx.

Vikram Sharma 🇯🇵's profile picture
Vikram Sharma 🇯🇵1 month ago

History does not repeat itself in terms of facts, but it does repeat its patterns over and over again. The United States is clearly following in the footsteps of the Soviet Union.

cianid123's profile picture
cianid1231 month ago

you give any of the chumps liek xi,trump or putin that military and its baringi from day one.

Maharsh's profile picture
Maharsh1 month ago

Soviet union did not collapse. Russia wanted to become rich and deliberately broke it down with Russia Ukraine belarus. The same Ukraine with which Russia is fighting a war now.

kevin's profile picture
kevin1 month ago

四十年前,里根用星球大战拉爆了苏联,四十年后,习近平用AI拉爆美国

Related Videos