Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

China isn’t just preparing for force against Taiwan, it’s using law as a weapon today. Prof. Julian Ku 古舉倫 warns that the PRC is deploying “lawfare” to coerce Taiwan, intimidate its international supporters, and even target foreign nationals, all below the threshold of armed conflict. If U.S. policy focuses...

ChinaSelect's profile picture

Select Committee on China

52,529 subscribers

14,668 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

If China Invades Taiwan, It’s Game Over for China What happens if China invades Taiwan? Will it be a quick victory—or an epic collapse? In this video, I reveal why a full-scale invasion of Taiwan by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) isn’t just unlikely—it would be national suicide for China. From logistical nightmares across the Taiwan Strait to a military plagued by purges and inexperience, this video exposes the hard truth: China’s invasion fantasy is a geopolitical illusion. The reason Xi Jinping hasn’t invaded Taiwan yet isn’t peace—it’s fear.
12:28

If China Invades Taiwan, It’s Game Over for China What happens if China invades Taiwan? Will it be a quick victory—or an epic collapse? In this video, I reveal why a full-scale invasion of Taiwan by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) isn’t just unlikely—it would be national suicide for China. From logistical nightmares across the Taiwan Strait to a military plagued by purges and inexperience, this video exposes the hard truth: China’s invasion fantasy is a geopolitical illusion. The reason Xi Jinping hasn’t invaded Taiwan yet isn’t peace—it’s fear.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

235,740 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Japan is escalating its response to China’s threats against Taiwan. Tokyo has announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island—just 68 miles from Taiwan—marking one of Japan’s clearest warnings yet to the Chinese Communist Party. The move comes in the middle of a growing feud between China and Japan that has already triggered export restrictions, cultural retaliation, and rising military tensions. Is Japan preparing for a future conflict over Taiwan?
8:11

Japan is escalating its response to China’s threats against Taiwan. Tokyo has announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island—just 68 miles from Taiwan—marking one of Japan’s clearest warnings yet to the Chinese Communist Party. The move comes in the middle of a growing feud between China and Japan that has already triggered export restrictions, cultural retaliation, and rising military tensions. Is Japan preparing for a future conflict over Taiwan?

China Uncensored

18,160 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The “forever war” argument collapses under the facts. The U.S. already spends up to $60B every year just deterring the Islamic Republic and the IRGC across the Middle East. That is the status quo. That is the endless war. Dealing with the regime that created the threat isn’t a war of choice. It’s the only way to end the one we’re already paying for. 📺 Tonight on Piers Morgan Uncensored:
1:46

The “forever war” argument collapses under the facts. The U.S. already spends up to $60B every year just deterring the Islamic Republic and the IRGC across the Middle East. That is the status quo. That is the endless war. Dealing with the regime that created the threat isn’t a war of choice. It’s the only way to end the one we’re already paying for. 📺 Tonight on Piers Morgan Uncensored:

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر

12,964 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan
1:28

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

Global Strategy

91,547 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Taiwan is NOT China!!! The friendship between America and the people of Taiwan has never been stronger. Taiwan is a vibrant democracy that deserves to be protected and respected on the global stage. With its innovative economy, vibrant culture, and free society, Taiwan has much to offer the world. With #China's continued aggression towards #Taiwan, it is essential for the U.S to show its support for Taiwan's sovereignty and its right to exist as a free and democratic nation.
2:12

Taiwan is NOT China!!! The friendship between America and the people of Taiwan has never been stronger. Taiwan is a vibrant democracy that deserves to be protected and respected on the global stage. With its innovative economy, vibrant culture, and free society, Taiwan has much to offer the world. With #China's continued aggression towards #Taiwan, it is essential for the U.S to show its support for Taiwan's sovereignty and its right to exist as a free and democratic nation.

Enes Kanter FREEDOM

134,128 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

In a provocative move, the U.S. has deployed 500 military personnel to Taiwan, as reported by Western media on May 26, 2025, directly violating the 1978 U.S.-China agreement banning such a presence. China has condemned this as a "salami slicing" strategy—small, calculated provocations to destabilize the region. This marks a dangerous escalation in the U.S.’s imperialist agenda, using Taiwan, a renegade province of China, as a pawn to maintain global dominance, much like it has in Ukraine. Historically, the U.S. stationed up to 30,000 troops in Taiwan during the 1950s and 60s, only to withdraw them in 1979 to counter the Soviet Union, betraying the island. Now, the U.S. is back, not just with troops but through hybrid warfare—funding NGOs, anti-China media, and rewriting history books to falsely portray Taiwan as culturally distinct, ignoring shared DNA, history, and traditions. China, seeking peaceful reunification, views this as aggression on its territory, a stance the U.S. acknowledges via the "One China" policy. The U.S.’s actions risk a devastating conflict, mirroring its chaos in Ukraine and the Middle East. China demands the U.S. withdraw its troops and halt its interference, warning that continued provocations could lead to severe consequences for regional stability and global peace.
1:40

In a provocative move, the U.S. has deployed 500 military personnel to Taiwan, as reported by Western media on May 26, 2025, directly violating the 1978 U.S.-China agreement banning such a presence. China has condemned this as a "salami slicing" strategy—small, calculated provocations to destabilize the region. This marks a dangerous escalation in the U.S.’s imperialist agenda, using Taiwan, a renegade province of China, as a pawn to maintain global dominance, much like it has in Ukraine. Historically, the U.S. stationed up to 30,000 troops in Taiwan during the 1950s and 60s, only to withdraw them in 1979 to counter the Soviet Union, betraying the island. Now, the U.S. is back, not just with troops but through hybrid warfare—funding NGOs, anti-China media, and rewriting history books to falsely portray Taiwan as culturally distinct, ignoring shared DNA, history, and traditions. China, seeking peaceful reunification, views this as aggression on its territory, a stance the U.S. acknowledges via the "One China" policy. The U.S.’s actions risk a devastating conflict, mirroring its chaos in Ukraine and the Middle East. China demands the U.S. withdraw its troops and halt its interference, warning that continued provocations could lead to severe consequences for regional stability and global peace.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹

24,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I remain absolutely flabbergasted at the level of propaganda on China in France, even on state television. This is a show called CCeSoir on France tv, and the guy speaking is Romain Graziani, supposedly one of France's leading "experts" on China, a Professor of Chinese studies at the École Normale Supérieure of Lyon. The way he narrates the history of Taiwan and why it matters to China is, put politely, a complete fabrication. Listening to him, "Taiwan was only really part of the Chinese nation for only 10 years" (and saying otherwise is "pure revisionism") and it's "only in the 1990s" that China's "obsession" with reuniting Taiwan first arose. He further asserts that it's only nowadays with Xi Jinping that "the predatory voracity of China leads to rewriting all of history as if it had been a lost province in the style of Ukraine with Russia." This is so outrageously wrong that I'm not even sure where to start. For one, as a Frenchman, maybe he should read the book "Quand la Chine s'éveillera" ("When China awakens") by Alain Peyrefitte, a former senior French politician and De Gaulle's confidant. In this book written in 1972 (so long before the 1990s), Peyrefitte - drawing from his extensive discussions with Zhou Enlai in China - describes Taiwan as "China's Alsace–Lorraine", drawing the comparison with France's own historical trauma of losing these provinces to Germany in 1871, showing that China's desire for reunification with Taiwan was already a central national priority decades before the 1990s, not a recent invention as Graziani falsely claims. In the book Peyrefitte also relates how he saw in China so many "Let's free Taiwan" slogans alongside others such as "Let's crush imperialism", demonstrating again how central it was to China back then already. The truth is that China's view of Taiwan as an inseparable part of its territory that needs to be reunited has been a persistent diplomatic stance ever since the creation of the PRC (and even before when it was colonized by Japan), making Graziani's timeline not just revisionism but an outright historical fabrication. Also, in his ridiculously wrong retelling of history, Graziani conveniently omits the central fact of Taiwan's recent history: that it indeed represents an "Alsace-Lorraine" for China in the sense that it is a painful territorial wound inflicted during a period of national weakness. Just as France never accepted the legitimacy of German control over Alsace-Lorraine and spent decades determined to recover it, China has consistently viewed Taiwan as a province temporarily separated by an unfinished civil war and foreign meddling, not as a '10-year' historical footnote as Graziani absurdly suggests. And, at the risk of being a "revisionist" in Graziani's eyes, it's also laughably wrong to suggest that Taiwan was only part of China for 10 years between 1885 and 1895. This deliberately obscures how in 1683, after defeating the forces of Ming loyalist Koxinga (who himself had expelled the Dutch colonizers), the Qing dynasty incorporated Taiwan into its empire. It's at this stage that Taiwan was formally incorporated into the empire and administered as part of Fujian province for over two centuries - not 10 years - before becoming its own province in 1885. The 1885 provincial reorganization that Graziani misrepresents as Taiwan's 'integration' was merely an administrative adjustment within already-established Chinese territory. Lastly, I get how comparing the issue of Taiwan with Ukraine is a convenient rhetorical device for Western commentators seeking to delegitimize China's sovereignty claims, but it's an outrageously dishonest parallel. For one, there is not a single country on earth, not one, that recognizes Taiwan as an independent sovereign country, unlike Ukraine. And, as a Frenchman, Graziani should know that France doesn't either. According to international law, Taiwan is part of China. Heck, Taiwan themselves, in their constitution (a reminder that the country is officially called "The Republic of China") do say that they're part of China, and they haven't declared independence. Granted, the "China" that the "Republic of China" say they're part of is a slightly different "China" than that of the PRC in that both entities claim to be the rightful government of the same Chinese territory—making the fundamental conflict a question of which government legitimately rules China, not whether Taiwan is part of China as Graziani disingenuously frames it. All this makes the Taiwan issue actually the opposite of Ukraine. Whereas Ukraine is a sovereign nation facing external aggression that violates its territorial integrity, Taiwan represents a separatist challenge to China's internationally recognized sovereignty. Supporting Taiwan independence therefore means endorsing the very violation of territorial integrity that is condemned in Ukraine's case, an irreconcilable contradiction. All in all, France allowing such egregious revisionism on state television is exceedingly dangerous. The irony is that this is France doing exactly what Graziani accuses China of: engaging in 'predatory' historical revisionism, with state television platforming blatant propaganda as expert academic analysis, propagating falsehoods that contradict international law and manufacture consent for confrontation.
1:58

I remain absolutely flabbergasted at the level of propaganda on China in France, even on state television. This is a show called CCeSoir on France tv, and the guy speaking is Romain Graziani, supposedly one of France's leading "experts" on China, a Professor of Chinese studies at the École Normale Supérieure of Lyon. The way he narrates the history of Taiwan and why it matters to China is, put politely, a complete fabrication. Listening to him, "Taiwan was only really part of the Chinese nation for only 10 years" (and saying otherwise is "pure revisionism") and it's "only in the 1990s" that China's "obsession" with reuniting Taiwan first arose. He further asserts that it's only nowadays with Xi Jinping that "the predatory voracity of China leads to rewriting all of history as if it had been a lost province in the style of Ukraine with Russia." This is so outrageously wrong that I'm not even sure where to start. For one, as a Frenchman, maybe he should read the book "Quand la Chine s'éveillera" ("When China awakens") by Alain Peyrefitte, a former senior French politician and De Gaulle's confidant. In this book written in 1972 (so long before the 1990s), Peyrefitte - drawing from his extensive discussions with Zhou Enlai in China - describes Taiwan as "China's Alsace–Lorraine", drawing the comparison with France's own historical trauma of losing these provinces to Germany in 1871, showing that China's desire for reunification with Taiwan was already a central national priority decades before the 1990s, not a recent invention as Graziani falsely claims. In the book Peyrefitte also relates how he saw in China so many "Let's free Taiwan" slogans alongside others such as "Let's crush imperialism", demonstrating again how central it was to China back then already. The truth is that China's view of Taiwan as an inseparable part of its territory that needs to be reunited has been a persistent diplomatic stance ever since the creation of the PRC (and even before when it was colonized by Japan), making Graziani's timeline not just revisionism but an outright historical fabrication. Also, in his ridiculously wrong retelling of history, Graziani conveniently omits the central fact of Taiwan's recent history: that it indeed represents an "Alsace-Lorraine" for China in the sense that it is a painful territorial wound inflicted during a period of national weakness. Just as France never accepted the legitimacy of German control over Alsace-Lorraine and spent decades determined to recover it, China has consistently viewed Taiwan as a province temporarily separated by an unfinished civil war and foreign meddling, not as a '10-year' historical footnote as Graziani absurdly suggests. And, at the risk of being a "revisionist" in Graziani's eyes, it's also laughably wrong to suggest that Taiwan was only part of China for 10 years between 1885 and 1895. This deliberately obscures how in 1683, after defeating the forces of Ming loyalist Koxinga (who himself had expelled the Dutch colonizers), the Qing dynasty incorporated Taiwan into its empire. It's at this stage that Taiwan was formally incorporated into the empire and administered as part of Fujian province for over two centuries - not 10 years - before becoming its own province in 1885. The 1885 provincial reorganization that Graziani misrepresents as Taiwan's 'integration' was merely an administrative adjustment within already-established Chinese territory. Lastly, I get how comparing the issue of Taiwan with Ukraine is a convenient rhetorical device for Western commentators seeking to delegitimize China's sovereignty claims, but it's an outrageously dishonest parallel. For one, there is not a single country on earth, not one, that recognizes Taiwan as an independent sovereign country, unlike Ukraine. And, as a Frenchman, Graziani should know that France doesn't either. According to international law, Taiwan is part of China. Heck, Taiwan themselves, in their constitution (a reminder that the country is officially called "The Republic of China") do say that they're part of China, and they haven't declared independence. Granted, the "China" that the "Republic of China" say they're part of is a slightly different "China" than that of the PRC in that both entities claim to be the rightful government of the same Chinese territory—making the fundamental conflict a question of which government legitimately rules China, not whether Taiwan is part of China as Graziani disingenuously frames it. All this makes the Taiwan issue actually the opposite of Ukraine. Whereas Ukraine is a sovereign nation facing external aggression that violates its territorial integrity, Taiwan represents a separatist challenge to China's internationally recognized sovereignty. Supporting Taiwan independence therefore means endorsing the very violation of territorial integrity that is condemned in Ukraine's case, an irreconcilable contradiction. All in all, France allowing such egregious revisionism on state television is exceedingly dangerous. The irony is that this is France doing exactly what Graziani accuses China of: engaging in 'predatory' historical revisionism, with state television platforming blatant propaganda as expert academic analysis, propagating falsehoods that contradict international law and manufacture consent for confrontation.

Arnaud Bertrand

226,234 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Taiwan came up after Trump's meeting with Xi, and Rubio had a simple answer. U.S. policy toward Taiwan is "unchanged." Xi had warned Trump that mishandling Taiwan could lead to "clashes and even conflicts" between the two countries. For all the pressure coming out of Beijing, the U.S. answer on Taiwan stayed exactly where it was. Source: NBC News
3:11

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Taiwan came up after Trump's meeting with Xi, and Rubio had a simple answer. U.S. policy toward Taiwan is "unchanged." Xi had warned Trump that mishandling Taiwan could lead to "clashes and even conflicts" between the two countries. For all the pressure coming out of Beijing, the U.S. answer on Taiwan stayed exactly where it was. Source: NBC News

Mario Nawfal

214,995 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kat Abughazaleh on Breaking Points says the US should codify providing aid to Taiwan in the case of an invasion from China "Any sort of military aid to Taiwan is an absolute last resort. We need to be reinvesting into diplomacy between Taiwan and China. If the Taiwanese people pass a referendum for reunification with China, I'm supportive of that. That is their choice. But invasion is where we draw the line." Ryan Grim clarifies, "does military aid mean shipping weapons or actively participating in and assisting in the defense?" "Shipping weapons. We should not have US troops deployed on Taiwanese soil."
4:33

Kat Abughazaleh on Breaking Points says the US should codify providing aid to Taiwan in the case of an invasion from China "Any sort of military aid to Taiwan is an absolute last resort. We need to be reinvesting into diplomacy between Taiwan and China. If the Taiwanese people pass a referendum for reunification with China, I'm supportive of that. That is their choice. But invasion is where we draw the line." Ryan Grim clarifies, "does military aid mean shipping weapons or actively participating in and assisting in the defense?" "Shipping weapons. We should not have US troops deployed on Taiwanese soil."

Popstonox

938,224 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Imposing criminal punishments on diehard separatists to safeguard the nation's core interests is a common practice in countries around the world. #Taiwan is a part of China, and China will never allow 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces to separate Taiwan from China under any name or by any means. The guidelines indicate that criminal punishment measures target only a very small number of individuals whose behavior is egregious and whose separatist activities are rampant, as well as the crimes of secession and incitement to secession they commit. This does not involve the vast majority of Taiwan compatriots," said Chen Binhua, a spokesman for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office. #StraitTalk
2:44

"Imposing criminal punishments on diehard separatists to safeguard the nation's core interests is a common practice in countries around the world. #Taiwan is a part of China, and China will never allow 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces to separate Taiwan from China under any name or by any means. The guidelines indicate that criminal punishment measures target only a very small number of individuals whose behavior is egregious and whose separatist activities are rampant, as well as the crimes of secession and incitement to secession they commit. This does not involve the vast majority of Taiwan compatriots," said Chen Binhua, a spokesman for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office. #StraitTalk

China Daily

11,524 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In response to a media inquiry about latest claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding the Taiwan question in an interview with The New York Times, in which he claimed that if China attempts to change the status quo in Taiwan during his term, he would be "very unhappy," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at Friday’s press briefing that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. The Taiwan question is purely China's internal affair, and resolving it is a matter for the Chinese people, brooking no external interference.
0:21

In response to a media inquiry about latest claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding the Taiwan question in an interview with The New York Times, in which he claimed that if China attempts to change the status quo in Taiwan during his term, he would be "very unhappy," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at Friday’s press briefing that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. The Taiwan question is purely China's internal affair, and resolving it is a matter for the Chinese people, brooking no external interference.

Global Times

24,212 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Anduril CEO Brian Schimpf with Hadrian Founder Chris Power on The Taiwan Invasion Scenario: “America has a very hard challenge.” China has invested in technology that pushes back the U.S. and creates an impenetrable bubble around Taiwan. They have space-based sensing and “Carrier Killer Missiles” that put U.S. carriers and warships at serious risk. Xi Jinping has stated that he wants his military ready by 2027 and will reunify by force if necessary. To deter the CCP the U.S. needs to make it clear that Taiwan is prepared to counter an invasion. The U.S. must focus on counteracting China’s space-based sensing while manufacturing large amounts of attritable systems until China’s population collapses.
2:19

Anduril CEO Brian Schimpf with Hadrian Founder Chris Power on The Taiwan Invasion Scenario: “America has a very hard challenge.” China has invested in technology that pushes back the U.S. and creates an impenetrable bubble around Taiwan. They have space-based sensing and “Carrier Killer Missiles” that put U.S. carriers and warships at serious risk. Xi Jinping has stated that he wants his military ready by 2027 and will reunify by force if necessary. To deter the CCP the U.S. needs to make it clear that Taiwan is prepared to counter an invasion. The U.S. must focus on counteracting China’s space-based sensing while manufacturing large amounts of attritable systems until China’s population collapses.

Anduril Appreciator

75,862 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇨🇳🇹🇼 Beijing has skillfully manipulated the international narrative surrounding cross-strait sovereignty by weaponizing its own definitions against Western leaders. Despite repeated statements that Taiwan already functions as a sovereign state with its own military and currency, the CCP routinely frames any effort to preserve the status quo as illegal separatism. The founder of Lei’s Real Talk notes that Washington’s top advisors are failing to challenge this rhetoric, leaving the administration trapped in a false comparison manufactured entirely by China. Lei's Real Talk
6:36

🇨🇳🇹🇼 Beijing has skillfully manipulated the international narrative surrounding cross-strait sovereignty by weaponizing its own definitions against Western leaders. Despite repeated statements that Taiwan already functions as a sovereign state with its own military and currency, the CCP routinely frames any effort to preserve the status quo as illegal separatism. The founder of Lei’s Real Talk notes that Washington’s top advisors are failing to challenge this rhetoric, leaving the administration trapped in a false comparison manufactured entirely by China. Lei's Real Talk

Mario Nawfal

48,089 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One common misconception about Taiwan is that all the Han Chinese on the island came over with with Chiang Kai-shek in 1949, when Mao's forces took control of all of mainland China and established the PRC. The Chinese have been immigrating to Taiwan since the 1600s, before the Qing Dynasty (or the United States) was even established. Both sides of my family immigrated during Qianlong's reign, during the latter half of the 1700s. We have been in Taiwan for so long that we don't know of a single blood relative in mainland China - which is something that surprises even my mainlander friends.
0:35

One common misconception about Taiwan is that all the Han Chinese on the island came over with with Chiang Kai-shek in 1949, when Mao's forces took control of all of mainland China and established the PRC. The Chinese have been immigrating to Taiwan since the 1600s, before the Qing Dynasty (or the United States) was even established. Both sides of my family immigrated during Qianlong's reign, during the latter half of the 1700s. We have been in Taiwan for so long that we don't know of a single blood relative in mainland China - which is something that surprises even my mainlander friends.

Scott Chen

54,632 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"NATO IS PREPARING FOR WAR AGAINST CHINA" NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated that China's significant military expansion has increased the likelihood of conflict regarding Taiwan. Mr. Rutte asserted that if China were to take action against Taiwan, there is a genuine chance that Beijing would encourage Russia to instigate issues in Europe, thereby distracting NATO's focus and resources. Rutte: "We have to stand ready, and we cannot be naive" “We have to be clear on this, and that is why that extra defence spending is so important"
1:02

"NATO IS PREPARING FOR WAR AGAINST CHINA" NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated that China's significant military expansion has increased the likelihood of conflict regarding Taiwan. Mr. Rutte asserted that if China were to take action against Taiwan, there is a genuine chance that Beijing would encourage Russia to instigate issues in Europe, thereby distracting NATO's focus and resources. Rutte: "We have to stand ready, and we cannot be naive" “We have to be clear on this, and that is why that extra defence spending is so important"

Global Strategy

191,969 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸AMERICA’S NEW STEALTH HUNTER KILLERS HAVE ARRIVED! I am convinced that China is nervous! A new Stealth bomber will give the US Air Force a decisive advantage in a potential future war over Taiwan. After eight years of development, the US Air Force has finally cleared the new Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider stealth bomber for production.Northrop Grumman The bomber is the key component in a stealthy reconnaissance-strike complex that could prove decisive in a major war with China over Taiwan. Study after study, war game after war game, points to missile-armed bombers as the decisive weapons in any major war over Taiwan. When the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC gamed out a Chinese invasion of Taiwan early last year, it concluded that US Air Force bombers working in conjunction with U.S. Navy submarines could decimate a Chinese invasion fleet and save Taiwan. Source: Telegraph, David Axe
1:02

🇺🇸AMERICA’S NEW STEALTH HUNTER KILLERS HAVE ARRIVED! I am convinced that China is nervous! A new Stealth bomber will give the US Air Force a decisive advantage in a potential future war over Taiwan. After eight years of development, the US Air Force has finally cleared the new Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider stealth bomber for production.Northrop Grumman The bomber is the key component in a stealthy reconnaissance-strike complex that could prove decisive in a major war with China over Taiwan. Study after study, war game after war game, points to missile-armed bombers as the decisive weapons in any major war over Taiwan. When the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC gamed out a Chinese invasion of Taiwan early last year, it concluded that US Air Force bombers working in conjunction with U.S. Navy submarines could decimate a Chinese invasion fleet and save Taiwan. Source: Telegraph, David Axe

WORLD AT WAR

117,993 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said “it would be a mistake” for the U.S. to change or shift rhetoric on its longstanding, “carefully-worded” position of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan. Gates told Margaret Brennan the U.S. policy on Taiwan is “one of those things where the experts parse these things down to the tense of the verbs,” and added that “keeping the U.S. position as it has been was important.”
1:05

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said “it would be a mistake” for the U.S. to change or shift rhetoric on its longstanding, “carefully-worded” position of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan. Gates told Margaret Brennan the U.S. policy on Taiwan is “one of those things where the experts parse these things down to the tense of the verbs,” and added that “keeping the U.S. position as it has been was important.”

Face The Nation

19,120 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"The only way Xi can achieve [his legacy] is to finish the job that Mao didn't finish - which is to take Taiwan,” says Guermantes Lailari, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel and longtime China researcher. Lailari moved to Taiwan to study the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) up close. In our interview he argues that China poses the most serious long-term threat to Western civilization—not just militarily, but through a combination of legal, economic, psychological, and intelligence operations.
1:09

"The only way Xi can achieve [his legacy] is to finish the job that Mao didn't finish - which is to take Taiwan,” says Guermantes Lailari, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel and longtime China researcher. Lailari moved to Taiwan to study the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) up close. In our interview he argues that China poses the most serious long-term threat to Western civilization—not just militarily, but through a combination of legal, economic, psychological, and intelligence operations.

Jan Jekielek

10,671 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

"If China hollows out the industrial base of all the G7 countries, and then there is a conflict over Taiwan, let's say, or as the South China Sea tabletop wargame exercises have already indicated that the U.S. and its allies would run out of ammo and missiles and materials within days or weeks, and it would takes years to rebuild it. So, that becomes a critical national security concern." - Michael Kovrig
0:46

"If China hollows out the industrial base of all the G7 countries, and then there is a conflict over Taiwan, let's say, or as the South China Sea tabletop wargame exercises have already indicated that the U.S. and its allies would run out of ammo and missiles and materials within days or weeks, and it would takes years to rebuild it. So, that becomes a critical national security concern." - Michael Kovrig

National Post

32,358 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten