Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

China wants Pierre out. Not my opinion. Documented. Sam Cooper has CSIS material showing the CCP interfered in the Conservative leadership race after O’Toole. They pushed proxies to sign up members and install a more “China-friendly” leader. They didn’t get their way then. Pierre won. After the last election... show more

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

92,148 subscribers

29,930 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

China considers Poilievre a threat 🚨 According to Sam Cooper, the same China-linked group that called for Erin O’Toole to step down is now demanding Poilievre do the same. They tried to shape the 2022 leadership race with a proxy recruiting members against an “anti-China” Conservative party. But it didn’t work. Now the attacks are back with the CCP likely being the influence behind them.

China considers Poilievre a threat 🚨 According to Sam Cooper, the same China-linked group that called for Erin O’Toole to step down is now demanding Poilievre do the same. They tried to shape the 2022 leadership race with a proxy recruiting members against an “anti-China” Conservative party. But it didn’t work. Now the attacks are back with the CCP likely being the influence behind them.

The Elevate Report

51,950 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Cooper dropped another bombshell. Canadian security agencies cleared a China-linked suspect for a sensitive NATO role. Even after a court found fraud in her CBSA job application. Read that again. They knew. They still waved her through. This is the same government that spent years ignoring CSIS warnings about PRC interference, United Front networks, and election meddling. Now under Carney the pattern continues. Our own agencies are clearing people tied to a hostile regime for positions inside our closest alliance. How many more wake-up calls do we need before someone in Ottawa treats national security like it actually matters? This isn’t competence. This is willful blindness. #cdnpoli #ForeignInterference #Carney #China #CanadaFirst

Sam Cooper dropped another bombshell. Canadian security agencies cleared a China-linked suspect for a sensitive NATO role. Even after a court found fraud in her CBSA job application. Read that again. They knew. They still waved her through. This is the same government that spent years ignoring CSIS warnings about PRC interference, United Front networks, and election meddling. Now under Carney the pattern continues. Our own agencies are clearing people tied to a hostile regime for positions inside our closest alliance. How many more wake-up calls do we need before someone in Ottawa treats national security like it actually matters? This isn’t competence. This is willful blindness. #cdnpoli #ForeignInterference #Carney #China #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

35,476 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I don’t want Pierre Poilievre to step down as leader. The last phone call I had with Pierre was in the summer of 2021. I told him then he should step down and go work with a company in Montreal. I argued it would beef up his resume with private-sector experience and make him look more balanced and set him up for a prime minister run after Erin O’Toole lost a second time to Trudeau. Instead, Pierre doubled down and embraced the convoy crazies and anti-vaxxers. This isn’t the right decade for the current incarnation of the Conservative Party. It’s not a leadership problem. It’s a party membership, donor-list, and staffing advisor problem which neutralizes the leader. It’s a party that has a built in opposition culture to its leader. Canada has the right person with Prime Minister Mark Carney now, we don’t need a negative change.

I don’t want Pierre Poilievre to step down as leader. The last phone call I had with Pierre was in the summer of 2021. I told him then he should step down and go work with a company in Montreal. I argued it would beef up his resume with private-sector experience and make him look more balanced and set him up for a prime minister run after Erin O’Toole lost a second time to Trudeau. Instead, Pierre doubled down and embraced the convoy crazies and anti-vaxxers. This isn’t the right decade for the current incarnation of the Conservative Party. It’s not a leadership problem. It’s a party membership, donor-list, and staffing advisor problem which neutralizes the leader. It’s a party that has a built in opposition culture to its leader. Canada has the right person with Prime Minister Mark Carney now, we don’t need a negative change.

Clinton Desveaux

36,119 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This guy just nailed it 👇 In election after election, more Canadians vote Conservative than Liberal… yet the Liberals keep forming government with way more seats. 2025: Liberals ~43.8% popular vote, Conservatives ~41.3% — nearly identical — but massive seat difference. Same story in 2021 and 2019. Pierre Poilievre dramatically grew the Conservative vote… and they still want him to step down? By that logic, Mark Carney should’ve stepped down the day after the election. Our broken electoral system lets Liberals win big on fewer actual votes while pretending they have a “strong mandate.” Pierre isn’t the problem — the system that ignores Conservative voters is. Keep fighting, Pierre. Canada sees what’s happening. 🔥🇨🇦

This guy just nailed it 👇 In election after election, more Canadians vote Conservative than Liberal… yet the Liberals keep forming government with way more seats. 2025: Liberals ~43.8% popular vote, Conservatives ~41.3% — nearly identical — but massive seat difference. Same story in 2021 and 2019. Pierre Poilievre dramatically grew the Conservative vote… and they still want him to step down? By that logic, Mark Carney should’ve stepped down the day after the election. Our broken electoral system lets Liberals win big on fewer actual votes while pretending they have a “strong mandate.” Pierre isn’t the problem — the system that ignores Conservative voters is. Keep fighting, Pierre. Canada sees what’s happening. 🔥🇨🇦

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

105,987 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: CCP-linked leftist riot funder Neville Singham has been coming IN AND OUT OF AMERICA and could face CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS soon Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is calling on Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent to FREEZE his assets, Singham lives in China ARREST HIM! He's also not registered as a foreign agent for China. LUNA: "We are trying to serve him in an effort to bring him into Congress to testify that he's been quietly sneaking in and out of this country!" "And so, yes, if you're looking for who's funding these, it is him. And the Treasury Department does have the authority to freeze his assets." "I think that they could get that information, but that would require them to open up a criminal investigation. I think that they have grounds to do so." "I've also sent letters to the Department of Justice to try to hit him with a FARA violation because he's not a registered foreign agent for China." "But again, that would require a criminal aspect. Either which way, he's not receiving and he will not, in my opinion, accept receipt of the subpoena, which means we'll be able to hold him in contempt of Congress. So that would then initiate the criminal proceedings." Anna Paulina Luna

🚨 BREAKING: CCP-linked leftist riot funder Neville Singham has been coming IN AND OUT OF AMERICA and could face CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS soon Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is calling on Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent to FREEZE his assets, Singham lives in China ARREST HIM! He's also not registered as a foreign agent for China. LUNA: "We are trying to serve him in an effort to bring him into Congress to testify that he's been quietly sneaking in and out of this country!" "And so, yes, if you're looking for who's funding these, it is him. And the Treasury Department does have the authority to freeze his assets." "I think that they could get that information, but that would require them to open up a criminal investigation. I think that they have grounds to do so." "I've also sent letters to the Department of Justice to try to hit him with a FARA violation because he's not a registered foreign agent for China." "But again, that would require a criminal aspect. Either which way, he's not receiving and he will not, in my opinion, accept receipt of the subpoena, which means we'll be able to hold him in contempt of Congress. So that would then initiate the criminal proceedings." Anna Paulina Luna

Eric Daugherty

75,470 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,767 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,762,666 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Carney has to make a statement: otherwise, it gives the appearance that he is compromised & encourages this type of behaviour. This is unacceptable. China boosted him & helped him get elected. While suppressing the opposition - Joe Tay to be exact. Now they arrest Joe Tay’s cousin & his cousins wife in Hong Kong. It’s insane. Shout out to Sam Cooper as always for breaking the story.

Carney has to make a statement: otherwise, it gives the appearance that he is compromised & encourages this type of behaviour. This is unacceptable. China boosted him & helped him get elected. While suppressing the opposition - Joe Tay to be exact. Now they arrest Joe Tay’s cousin & his cousins wife in Hong Kong. It’s insane. Shout out to Sam Cooper as always for breaking the story.

Mario Zelaya

57,675 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

China responded coldly to questions about the sanctions on the Philippine defense minister. Good. This is exactly why Chinese people find Teodoro disgusting. Territorial disputes are one thing. But the Philippines under people like him has turned itself into something much uglier: begging China for fuel, fertilizer, and assistance when it needs help, then smearing China the moment it wants to perform loyalty for Washington, while openly embracing Japan — the same imperial Japan that invaded, occupied, and massacred Filipinos. Bataan Death March. Japanese occupation. Manila massacre. That was Filipino blood. And now Manila’s defense chief wants to polish Japan’s return to militarism while calling China the threat? This has crossed the line of basic human ethics. He is not “upholding the nation.” This is political theater by a man using anti-China hysteria to buy relevance from the U.S. and Japan. He takes aid when convenient. He bites the hand when useful. He invites outside powers into the region. He internationalizes disputes. He smears China nonstop. Then he cries when China finally sanctions him. Colonial pets in dog collars often mistake provoking China for diplomacy. So they beg in the morning, bark in the afternoon, and pretend to be statesmen at night. Beijing is not playing these low-down games with them. China simply did what any serious major power should do: Sanction him.

China responded coldly to questions about the sanctions on the Philippine defense minister. Good. This is exactly why Chinese people find Teodoro disgusting. Territorial disputes are one thing. But the Philippines under people like him has turned itself into something much uglier: begging China for fuel, fertilizer, and assistance when it needs help, then smearing China the moment it wants to perform loyalty for Washington, while openly embracing Japan — the same imperial Japan that invaded, occupied, and massacred Filipinos. Bataan Death March. Japanese occupation. Manila massacre. That was Filipino blood. And now Manila’s defense chief wants to polish Japan’s return to militarism while calling China the threat? This has crossed the line of basic human ethics. He is not “upholding the nation.” This is political theater by a man using anti-China hysteria to buy relevance from the U.S. and Japan. He takes aid when convenient. He bites the hand when useful. He invites outside powers into the region. He internationalizes disputes. He smears China nonstop. Then he cries when China finally sanctions him. Colonial pets in dog collars often mistake provoking China for diplomacy. So they beg in the morning, bark in the afternoon, and pretend to be statesmen at night. Beijing is not playing these low-down games with them. China simply did what any serious major power should do: Sanction him.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

31,014 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.

So now... The same colonial lapdogs who scream “China’s army is useless” are the ones demanding China fix the Middle East, discipline the US, and babysit every faction like Beijing is the world’s unpaid father. When China defends its own borders → “militarism.” When China refuses to fight someone else’s wars → “irresponsible.” So the standard is simple: China must fight when they want, and abstain when they want. A colonial script in two sentences. These clowns don’t want “peace,” they want a China that bleeds for them, a China that pays the cost of wars started by others, so they can preserve their narrative of Western innocence and Asian obligation. China’s position is consistent and adult: — stop military escalation — return to talks — oppose illegal strikes This is what a sovereign country sounds like. Not a subcontractor for empire, not a nanny for collapsing states. To the colonial mind, China must be everywhere, except when it safeguards its own interests. They never wanted China’s involvement; they’re just trapped in a habit: if something happens, blame China; if nothing happens, still blame China... This has become a conditioned reflex for colonial pets.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

98,111 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Speaking in the Chamber today on the Official Secrets Act, I raised deep concern over the decision to drop charges against two individuals accused of espionage for China. As someone sanctioned and targeted by the Chinese Government, I was briefed at the outset that this was a “slam-dunk” prosecution — they were clear that they had met every single requirement within the Official Secrets Act about passing secure information to the Chinese intelligence agency that would be “directly or indirectly" useful to the Chinese state. That is very clear. It cannot, therefore, be for a lack of evidence that this has been dropped by the CPS, so why has the case been abandoned? The issue lies in how the Act defines an “enemy”. After the China audit, the Labour Government had the chance to put China in the same upper tier as Russia, North Korea and Iran — but chose not to. Ministers call China a “challenge”, not a threat. That position is indefensible. The Minister speaks of threats, but he does not say that China is a threat; he says it is a “challenge”, which is a ludicrous position to take. This decision has let down Parliament and, indeed, Mr Speaker himself, who stood up for Members targeted by Beijing. Until China is recognised for what it is — a persistent threat to individuals and states — our national security will remain compromised, and our reputation weakened as a strong state against terrorism.

Speaking in the Chamber today on the Official Secrets Act, I raised deep concern over the decision to drop charges against two individuals accused of espionage for China. As someone sanctioned and targeted by the Chinese Government, I was briefed at the outset that this was a “slam-dunk” prosecution — they were clear that they had met every single requirement within the Official Secrets Act about passing secure information to the Chinese intelligence agency that would be “directly or indirectly" useful to the Chinese state. That is very clear. It cannot, therefore, be for a lack of evidence that this has been dropped by the CPS, so why has the case been abandoned? The issue lies in how the Act defines an “enemy”. After the China audit, the Labour Government had the chance to put China in the same upper tier as Russia, North Korea and Iran — but chose not to. Ministers call China a “challenge”, not a threat. That position is indefensible. The Minister speaks of threats, but he does not say that China is a threat; he says it is a “challenge”, which is a ludicrous position to take. This decision has let down Parliament and, indeed, Mr Speaker himself, who stood up for Members targeted by Beijing. Until China is recognised for what it is — a persistent threat to individuals and states — our national security will remain compromised, and our reputation weakened as a strong state against terrorism.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

80,556 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Chen Weihua: ‘People are waking up to the fact that the Western powers are the real threat to the world, NOT China🇨🇳.’ ‘US soft power is declining fast, Israel is one of the most hated countries in the world. The US global standing is declining. Just look at US allies, those leaders are visiting China. Obviously, they were coerced by the US administration. Many of them were, I would say are puppet states in a certain way. They have been manipulated by Washington for a long time against China, especially in the last few years. But now they are waking up. You have Mark Carney talking about rupture, middle power, and all these things. So the world is changing, obviously. More people are awakening, and they are awakening to the lies those Western nations told for years, repeatedly using their propaganda, smearing China and painting China as a threat to the world. But if you look at what has happened in the world in the last couple of years, it is not China. It is the United States. It is Israel. It is the G7. It is NATO. It is the Western powers who claim to be the international community.’ —Chen Weihua （陈卫华）, former EU Bureau Chief of China Daily, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Chen Weihua: ‘People are waking up to the fact that the Western powers are the real threat to the world, NOT China🇨🇳.’ ‘US soft power is declining fast, Israel is one of the most hated countries in the world. The US global standing is declining. Just look at US allies, those leaders are visiting China. Obviously, they were coerced by the US administration. Many of them were, I would say are puppet states in a certain way. They have been manipulated by Washington for a long time against China, especially in the last few years. But now they are waking up. You have Mark Carney talking about rupture, middle power, and all these things. So the world is changing, obviously. More people are awakening, and they are awakening to the lies those Western nations told for years, repeatedly using their propaganda, smearing China and painting China as a threat to the world. But if you look at what has happened in the world in the last couple of years, it is not China. It is the United States. It is Israel. It is the G7. It is NATO. It is the Western powers who claim to be the international community.’ —Chen Weihua （陈卫华）, former EU Bureau Chief of China Daily, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

29,866 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I think I finally see all the traitors. Here’s the part most people don’t know about Kory Teneycke: In 2019, he founded a non-profit called Conservative Victory with one stated goal: remove Andrew Scheer as leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. Scheer resigned within weeks. Just this week, Kory Teneycke just called Pierre Poilievre “A-hole in Chief.” Ad hominem. That’s the formal name for it. When you can’t argue the substance (that Canada is the only G7 country in a recession, that Mexico has three trade rounds and Canada has zero) you attack the man instead. Earlier on,Teneycke was Stephen Harper’s Director of Communications. He resigned after roughly a year, citing family reasons. He has spent the last several years on CBC, CTV, and Global panels positioning himself as a Conservative “insider.” He’s been hostile to Pierre since since the election. Now he’s calling him names on national television. And then there’s Dimitri Soudas. Same playbook. Fired in 2014 from the Conservative Party for interfering in his fiancée Eve Adams’s nomination race. Within months, his fiancée crossed the floor to the Liberals and Soudas helped broker the move. He then bought a Liberal Party membership. Today, Soudas writes Toronto Star op-eds attacking Pierre Poilievre. This is the pattern. The same names. The same playbook. The same goal. They removed Scheer. Now they’re going after Poilievre. I think I finally see all the traitors. And I think Canadians should too.

I think I finally see all the traitors. Here’s the part most people don’t know about Kory Teneycke: In 2019, he founded a non-profit called Conservative Victory with one stated goal: remove Andrew Scheer as leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. Scheer resigned within weeks. Just this week, Kory Teneycke just called Pierre Poilievre “A-hole in Chief.” Ad hominem. That’s the formal name for it. When you can’t argue the substance (that Canada is the only G7 country in a recession, that Mexico has three trade rounds and Canada has zero) you attack the man instead. Earlier on,Teneycke was Stephen Harper’s Director of Communications. He resigned after roughly a year, citing family reasons. He has spent the last several years on CBC, CTV, and Global panels positioning himself as a Conservative “insider.” He’s been hostile to Pierre since since the election. Now he’s calling him names on national television. And then there’s Dimitri Soudas. Same playbook. Fired in 2014 from the Conservative Party for interfering in his fiancée Eve Adams’s nomination race. Within months, his fiancée crossed the floor to the Liberals and Soudas helped broker the move. He then bought a Liberal Party membership. Today, Soudas writes Toronto Star op-eds attacking Pierre Poilievre. This is the pattern. The same names. The same playbook. The same goal. They removed Scheer. Now they’re going after Poilievre. I think I finally see all the traitors. And I think Canadians should too.

Mario Zelaya

54,219 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

John Solomon just joined Hannity to break down the news today that James Comey was subpoenaed for the Grand Conspiracy case down in Florida and how it’s related to the recent news of China meddling in the 2020 election. “James Comey is gonna be asked did John Brennan ask you to get him the Steele Dossier. Were you working together with him to get the Steele Dossier to be underlying the document (the ICA).” They chose politics (power) over country. Fast forward to 2020 and they chose politics over country again by hiding the intelligence they had that China accessing accessed our voter data. The grand conspiracy is heating up. More than 130 other subpoenas have been sent out in connection with the investigation. John Solomon

John Solomon just joined Hannity to break down the news today that James Comey was subpoenaed for the Grand Conspiracy case down in Florida and how it’s related to the recent news of China meddling in the 2020 election. “James Comey is gonna be asked did John Brennan ask you to get him the Steele Dossier. Were you working together with him to get the Steele Dossier to be underlying the document (the ICA).” They chose politics (power) over country. Fast forward to 2020 and they chose politics over country again by hiding the intelligence they had that China accessing accessed our voter data. The grand conspiracy is heating up. More than 130 other subpoenas have been sent out in connection with the investigation. John Solomon

TheStormHasArrived

83,583 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) lays out the highest-order Western geopolitical imperative: dominate the Eurasian landmass by subjugating China, Russia and Iran. Military defeat is not required. Political penetration, color revolutions, and assassinations are the preferred methods. The same system that imposed the Opium Wars and the Century of Humiliation on China is still operating today. “China is on the Eurasian continent, and so is Iran, and so is Russia. The United States and Great Britain have their highest-order geopolitical imperative: to dominate the Eurasian landmass. They need to subjugate not just Iran, but also China and Russia, and turn them into their own colonies. That is the plan. The Chinese are very much aware of that, and the Russians are aware of it, and the Iranians are aware of it. And they are also aware of what that means, because they have centuries’ worth of experience. When the British Empire first colonized China, they imposed two successive Opium Wars on them. At that time, China was not like some backwater. This was a 3,000-year-old civilization, and it was the world’s number one economic superpower. But it got absolutely crushed by the British. And then they imposed what the Chinese call a century of humiliation on them. And after two World Wars, China emerged as one of the world’s poorest countries. This was not because they sustained a military defeat. It’s not necessary for the United States to defeat China or Russia militarily. They specialize in penetrating political power. What they did in Ukraine in 2014 — they staged a coup. They overthrew Viktor Yanukovych, who was duly democratically elected. And they replaced him first with Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and then came Poroshenko. Now we have Zelensky. And then Ukraine became like an entity infected by a parasite, carrying water for the empire. Another alternative was Venezuela, where it was done even more elegantly. They basically just extracted Nicolás Maduro and somehow turned Delcy Rodríguez around. And now Venezuela is their vassal. If they were able to do that to Venezuela and to Ukraine and to Colombia and to many other countries, they could do the same to Russia. They don’t need to overthrow them militarily. Conceivably, they can stage some kind of a destabilization program; they can overthrow Vladimir Putin through some kind of a color revolution. The point is you take political control of the nation. You don’t have to defeat them militarily. And it’s preferable that you don’t defeat them militarily, because then you can use their military power against your next enemy. In the same way, after overthrowing Yanukovych, they started developing Ukraine as a proxy force against Russia. Well, if they overthrew Vladimir Putin and installed their own puppet there, they could use Russia in that same way against China. And that way they get their hegemony over the whole Eurasian landmass. And this is the great danger of this Western system. The Western empire will never stop trying to do this. If a color revolution fails, then they go with invasion. If the invasion fails, then they do what they did in Venezuela or assassinations like they did against Thomas Sankara, or like they tried many times against other leaders. This pathogen keeps attacking. It’s like a constant attack on the sovereignty and stability of every nation that they target, and they target any nation that refuses to be bludgeoned into submission. So this will continue. And I think that the conflict will continue until one side is completely defeated. Meanwhile, this danger is uniting the enemies together. Russia and China, who used to have major issues between themselves, have now become very tight allies, and they see this alliance as absolutely existential. Because if Russia falls, it might become an enemy to China. If Iran falls, it might become an enemy to Russia. And they will definitely try to raze the Belt and Road Initiative to the ground and force everybody back into the Western trade matrix and Western-imposed trade settlement currencies and reserve currencies. And then again you’ll be in a situation where you have maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in Western financial institutions, but you can’t use them unless you have approval and an agreement with the empire. So if you want to build diversified farming producing healthy foods, they’ll say, ‘No, but we’ll give you that money if you’re going to kill all the cows and build cricket farms.’ They want to shape the future of humanity, and they want to shape it in a way that’s utterly dystopian and ugly.” This is the pathogen that never stops attacking. Russia, China and Iran understand the danger. That is why their alliance is now existential.

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) lays out the highest-order Western geopolitical imperative: dominate the Eurasian landmass by subjugating China, Russia and Iran. Military defeat is not required. Political penetration, color revolutions, and assassinations are the preferred methods. The same system that imposed the Opium Wars and the Century of Humiliation on China is still operating today. “China is on the Eurasian continent, and so is Iran, and so is Russia. The United States and Great Britain have their highest-order geopolitical imperative: to dominate the Eurasian landmass. They need to subjugate not just Iran, but also China and Russia, and turn them into their own colonies. That is the plan. The Chinese are very much aware of that, and the Russians are aware of it, and the Iranians are aware of it. And they are also aware of what that means, because they have centuries’ worth of experience. When the British Empire first colonized China, they imposed two successive Opium Wars on them. At that time, China was not like some backwater. This was a 3,000-year-old civilization, and it was the world’s number one economic superpower. But it got absolutely crushed by the British. And then they imposed what the Chinese call a century of humiliation on them. And after two World Wars, China emerged as one of the world’s poorest countries. This was not because they sustained a military defeat. It’s not necessary for the United States to defeat China or Russia militarily. They specialize in penetrating political power. What they did in Ukraine in 2014 — they staged a coup. They overthrew Viktor Yanukovych, who was duly democratically elected. And they replaced him first with Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and then came Poroshenko. Now we have Zelensky. And then Ukraine became like an entity infected by a parasite, carrying water for the empire. Another alternative was Venezuela, where it was done even more elegantly. They basically just extracted Nicolás Maduro and somehow turned Delcy Rodríguez around. And now Venezuela is their vassal. If they were able to do that to Venezuela and to Ukraine and to Colombia and to many other countries, they could do the same to Russia. They don’t need to overthrow them militarily. Conceivably, they can stage some kind of a destabilization program; they can overthrow Vladimir Putin through some kind of a color revolution. The point is you take political control of the nation. You don’t have to defeat them militarily. And it’s preferable that you don’t defeat them militarily, because then you can use their military power against your next enemy. In the same way, after overthrowing Yanukovych, they started developing Ukraine as a proxy force against Russia. Well, if they overthrew Vladimir Putin and installed their own puppet there, they could use Russia in that same way against China. And that way they get their hegemony over the whole Eurasian landmass. And this is the great danger of this Western system. The Western empire will never stop trying to do this. If a color revolution fails, then they go with invasion. If the invasion fails, then they do what they did in Venezuela or assassinations like they did against Thomas Sankara, or like they tried many times against other leaders. This pathogen keeps attacking. It’s like a constant attack on the sovereignty and stability of every nation that they target, and they target any nation that refuses to be bludgeoned into submission. So this will continue. And I think that the conflict will continue until one side is completely defeated. Meanwhile, this danger is uniting the enemies together. Russia and China, who used to have major issues between themselves, have now become very tight allies, and they see this alliance as absolutely existential. Because if Russia falls, it might become an enemy to China. If Iran falls, it might become an enemy to Russia. And they will definitely try to raze the Belt and Road Initiative to the ground and force everybody back into the Western trade matrix and Western-imposed trade settlement currencies and reserve currencies. And then again you’ll be in a situation where you have maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in Western financial institutions, but you can’t use them unless you have approval and an agreement with the empire. So if you want to build diversified farming producing healthy foods, they’ll say, ‘No, but we’ll give you that money if you’re going to kill all the cows and build cricket farms.’ They want to shape the future of humanity, and they want to shape it in a way that’s utterly dystopian and ugly.” This is the pathogen that never stops attacking. Russia, China and Iran understand the danger. That is why their alliance is now existential.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

21,479 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey on China’s Hidden “Ghost Fleet”: “China has 350x more shipbuilding capacity than the United States.” “Because in China, the law says that all commercial vessels have to meet military standards.” “They foresee a world where they’re going to nationalize their entire domestic fleet in a whole-of-China fight against the west.” “Quantity has a quality all its own… we’re gonna crank out [one] ship a month and they’re gonna put out 350 ships a month.” The only way for the U.S. Navy to catch up with China is autonomy. 🇺🇸 (See linked post)

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey on China’s Hidden “Ghost Fleet”: “China has 350x more shipbuilding capacity than the United States.” “Because in China, the law says that all commercial vessels have to meet military standards.” “They foresee a world where they’re going to nationalize their entire domestic fleet in a whole-of-China fight against the west.” “Quantity has a quality all its own… we’re gonna crank out [one] ship a month and they’re gonna put out 350 ships a month.” The only way for the U.S. Navy to catch up with China is autonomy. 🇺🇸 (See linked post)

Anduril Appreciator

337,416 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨Pep Guardiola on Julian Alvarez situation concerning Barcelona, Arsenal, Simeone and Atletico Madrid president, Gil Marin: 🎙️Reporter: Pep, Álvarez wants Barcelona, but Atlético prefer Arsenal. You let him leave City when he was contracted — do you see the hypocrisy in Simeone’s handling of this? 🗣️Pep: Yes. And I will not pretend I don’t. When Julián was at City he had a contract until 2028. A real contract. Diego wanted him. Fine. Every coach wants good players. But what did he do? He called Julián five times during the negotiation. Five. His son Giuliano was messaging him. De Paul. Molina. The whole Argentine family inside Atlético selling him the same line: ‘Come here, you will be the main man, not second behind Erling.’ That is tapping. That is convincing a player who is under contract to walk away from the club that paid him, trained him, and won everything with him. And what did I do? I did not go on television to cry. I did not send my players to WhatsApp him at midnight. I did not tell the world that City would rather sell him to anyone except the club he actually wanted. I sat with him. He said he wanted a new challenge. I said: okay. If a player wants to leave, I am not a jailer. I thanked him for two years of enormous contribution. We facilitated the deal. We treated him like a human being, not a hostage. Now the same player says, in public, with honesty: I want to fulfil my dream. Barcelona. Everyone in football knows what that means for an Argentine who grew up watching that shirt. And now Simeone and the president discover principles. Suddenly the contract is sacred. Suddenly ‘he is our player and we will look after him.’ Suddenly they will sell him to Arsenal, to the moon, to anyone — just not to the one club he named as his dream. That is not protecting the club. That is spite. That is ego. That is a coach who was happy to tap a contracted City player when it suited him, and now pretends he is the guardian of loyalty when the player wants to go to Camp Nou. You cannot call a boy five times to steal him from Manchester and then whistle him in your own stadium because he wants Barcelona. You cannot use De Paul and Molina as recruiters and then act shocked when the same player is honest two years later. Either contracts are holy or they are not. You cannot change the religion depending on who is buying. Julián was never a problem for me. He worked, he pressed, he scored, he never complained in the dressing room. When he asked to leave, I helped him leave. That is respect. What they are doing now is the opposite. They are telling a World Cup winner: you can go anywhere except the place that lives in your head. If Simeone wanted to be consistent, he would pick up the phone the same way he did in 2024 and say: ‘Go. We will not hold you hostage.’ Instead they hide behind Gil Marín, behind a clause nobody will ever pay, and they shop him to Arsenal like a punishment. I have nothing against Atlético as a club. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You cannot hunt a player under contract and then chain him when he hunts his own dream. That is not leadership. That is fear dressed up as dignity.

🚨Pep Guardiola on Julian Alvarez situation concerning Barcelona, Arsenal, Simeone and Atletico Madrid president, Gil Marin: 🎙️Reporter: Pep, Álvarez wants Barcelona, but Atlético prefer Arsenal. You let him leave City when he was contracted — do you see the hypocrisy in Simeone’s handling of this? 🗣️Pep: Yes. And I will not pretend I don’t. When Julián was at City he had a contract until 2028. A real contract. Diego wanted him. Fine. Every coach wants good players. But what did he do? He called Julián five times during the negotiation. Five. His son Giuliano was messaging him. De Paul. Molina. The whole Argentine family inside Atlético selling him the same line: ‘Come here, you will be the main man, not second behind Erling.’ That is tapping. That is convincing a player who is under contract to walk away from the club that paid him, trained him, and won everything with him. And what did I do? I did not go on television to cry. I did not send my players to WhatsApp him at midnight. I did not tell the world that City would rather sell him to anyone except the club he actually wanted. I sat with him. He said he wanted a new challenge. I said: okay. If a player wants to leave, I am not a jailer. I thanked him for two years of enormous contribution. We facilitated the deal. We treated him like a human being, not a hostage. Now the same player says, in public, with honesty: I want to fulfil my dream. Barcelona. Everyone in football knows what that means for an Argentine who grew up watching that shirt. And now Simeone and the president discover principles. Suddenly the contract is sacred. Suddenly ‘he is our player and we will look after him.’ Suddenly they will sell him to Arsenal, to the moon, to anyone — just not to the one club he named as his dream. That is not protecting the club. That is spite. That is ego. That is a coach who was happy to tap a contracted City player when it suited him, and now pretends he is the guardian of loyalty when the player wants to go to Camp Nou. You cannot call a boy five times to steal him from Manchester and then whistle him in your own stadium because he wants Barcelona. You cannot use De Paul and Molina as recruiters and then act shocked when the same player is honest two years later. Either contracts are holy or they are not. You cannot change the religion depending on who is buying. Julián was never a problem for me. He worked, he pressed, he scored, he never complained in the dressing room. When he asked to leave, I helped him leave. That is respect. What they are doing now is the opposite. They are telling a World Cup winner: you can go anywhere except the place that lives in your head. If Simeone wanted to be consistent, he would pick up the phone the same way he did in 2024 and say: ‘Go. We will not hold you hostage.’ Instead they hide behind Gil Marín, behind a clause nobody will ever pay, and they shop him to Arsenal like a punishment. I have nothing against Atlético as a club. I have a problem with hypocrisy. You cannot hunt a player under contract and then chain him when he hunts his own dream. That is not leadership. That is fear dressed up as dignity.

Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚

179,327 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen