Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

China warns that mishandling the Taiwan question risks bilateral ties, even after “strategic stability” talks with Trump. So things are very clear: Trump may flatter. Washington may smile. The banquet may be magnificent. But China’s red lines do not move. Taiwan is not a deal. It is a core... show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

53,552 subscribers

11,023 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,183 views • 3 months ago

China issued a stern warning to Trump over U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and potential talks with Taiwanese separatists, and suspended planned visits by U.S. military personnel to China’s Ministry of National Defense. Trump’s performative impulse is back. He seems to believe Taiwan is just another tool he can use to gain diplomatic attention. But China is not a reality show audience. China’s position is clear, consistent, and disciplined: No official exchanges between the U.S. and China’s Taiwan region. No arms sales to Taiwan. No encouragement of “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. No playing with the most sensitive issue in China-U.S. relations. Trump likes spectacle. He likes leverage. He likes turning every issue into a personal performance. But Taiwan is not a prop. It is not a bargaining chip for campaign theater. And it is certainly not a stage for Washington to act out its imperial nostalgia. China is a civilization with discipline. It can give Trump ceremony when ceremony serves strategy. But on sovereignty, there is no stagecraft. Only red lines.

China issued a stern warning to Trump over U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and potential talks with Taiwanese separatists, and suspended planned visits by U.S. military personnel to China’s Ministry of National Defense. Trump’s performative impulse is back. He seems to believe Taiwan is just another tool he can use to gain diplomatic attention. But China is not a reality show audience. China’s position is clear, consistent, and disciplined: No official exchanges between the U.S. and China’s Taiwan region. No arms sales to Taiwan. No encouragement of “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. No playing with the most sensitive issue in China-U.S. relations. Trump likes spectacle. He likes leverage. He likes turning every issue into a personal performance. But Taiwan is not a prop. It is not a bargaining chip for campaign theater. And it is certainly not a stage for Washington to act out its imperial nostalgia. China is a civilization with discipline. It can give Trump ceremony when ceremony serves strategy. But on sovereignty, there is no stagecraft. Only red lines.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,057 views • 3 months ago

China’s President Xi appears to have has laid out a new strategic framework for the bilateral relationship. He calls it “constructive strategic stability”. Which sounds like a form of leader-led detente but still with deep red lines on Taiwan. On US ABC News Live just now discussing this and other new directions discussed so far during the US-China summit in Beijing.

China’s President Xi appears to have has laid out a new strategic framework for the bilateral relationship. He calls it “constructive strategic stability”. Which sounds like a form of leader-led detente but still with deep red lines on Taiwan. On US ABC News Live just now discussing this and other new directions discussed so far during the US-China summit in Beijing.

Kevin Rudd

10,526 views • 3 months ago

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

Kevork Almassian

19,145 views • 3 months ago

Former U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns tells me that if President Trump does not move forward with the congressionally-approved Taiwan arms package, it would be “a major strategic move” and “the greatest mistake of Trump’s foreign policy in this second term.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns tells me that if President Trump does not move forward with the congressionally-approved Taiwan arms package, it would be “a major strategic move” and “the greatest mistake of Trump’s foreign policy in this second term.”

Jim Sciutto

70,699 views • 3 months ago

🚨MAJOR BREAKING TRADE DEVASTATION FOR TRUMP China spokesman Guo Jiakun says that Trump’s “blackmail” negotiation tactics will NEVER work with China. “A deal while exerting extreme pressure is not the right way to deal with China and simply will not work.” It gets worse: Jiakun also called media reports and claims by Trump that he has spoken with China and are close to a deal is what he called, “FAKE NEWS.” “We have made it very clear that China does not look for a war, but neither are we afraid of it. We will fight, if fight we must.” Art of the deal. 🤡

🚨MAJOR BREAKING TRADE DEVASTATION FOR TRUMP China spokesman Guo Jiakun says that Trump’s “blackmail” negotiation tactics will NEVER work with China. “A deal while exerting extreme pressure is not the right way to deal with China and simply will not work.” It gets worse: Jiakun also called media reports and claims by Trump that he has spoken with China and are close to a deal is what he called, “FAKE NEWS.” “We have made it very clear that China does not look for a war, but neither are we afraid of it. We will fight, if fight we must.” Art of the deal. 🤡

CALL TO ACTIVISM

562,121 views • 1 year ago

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,786 views • 3 months ago

Francis Fukuyama: "America under Trump has been engaged in such a determined process of self-harm that China does not really need to do anything other than sit back and watch it unfold. Trump predicted that China would not attack Taiwan while he was the president. And he may be right about this. He does not want to get in the way of a declining United States."

Francis Fukuyama: "America under Trump has been engaged in such a determined process of self-harm that China does not really need to do anything other than sit back and watch it unfold. Trump predicted that China would not attack Taiwan while he was the president. And he may be right about this. He does not want to get in the way of a declining United States."

Scott Robertson

38,504 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

235,707 views • 3 months ago

China has banned the export of all dual-use items to Japanese military users and for Japan’s military use. The aim is to contain Japan’s remilitarization and its attempt to possess nuclear weapons, said the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Sanae Takaichi lamented at the G7 that China’s rare earth sanctions are affecting Japan’s economy. This is the same person who openly threatened China by saying that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency.” A defeated fascist state, once disarmed by the anti-fascist order after turning Asia into a slaughterhouse, is now trying to insert itself into China’s internal affairs and present that as “security.” Then when China responds with economic measures, Japan plays the victim. Classic. Japan should be glad that China is not the United States. If a foreign leader said “a Cuba emergency is our emergency” to Washington, the U.S. would not respond with polite export controls. It would call it a national security threat, sanction everyone involved, send warships, threaten regime change, and may even kidnap that leader and his family within a week, drag them back to the United States, and try them on drug trafficking charges. Trump attacked Iran for months under the excuse that Iran must not even have the chance to build a nuclear weapon. Iran did not say “Cuba is our emergency.” Iran did not invade the U.S. Iran did not station forces near Florida. Yet Washington bombed Tehran, assassinated Khamenei, blockaded Hormuz, and called it security. Japan, meanwhile, openly links itself to Taiwan, challenges China’s sovereignty, pushes remilitarization, flirts with nuclear ambitions, and then cries when China restricts dual-use exports. Japan should understand one thing very clearly: China’s economic measures are restraint. Perhaps too restrained. That is exactly why Japan dares to challenge China’s core red lines of sovereignty again and again. In the end, a defeated militarist power does not get to threaten the victorious country, interfere in its territorial question, and then demand uninterrupted access to strategic materials. If Japan wants stable relations with China, it should stop pretending dialogue means China staying silent while Tokyo rearms, provokes, and hides behind the G7. China is indeed not the United States. That is why Japan is still being warned through economic tools instead of being treated the way Washington treats countries that cross its red lines.

China has banned the export of all dual-use items to Japanese military users and for Japan’s military use. The aim is to contain Japan’s remilitarization and its attempt to possess nuclear weapons, said the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Sanae Takaichi lamented at the G7 that China’s rare earth sanctions are affecting Japan’s economy. This is the same person who openly threatened China by saying that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency.” A defeated fascist state, once disarmed by the anti-fascist order after turning Asia into a slaughterhouse, is now trying to insert itself into China’s internal affairs and present that as “security.” Then when China responds with economic measures, Japan plays the victim. Classic. Japan should be glad that China is not the United States. If a foreign leader said “a Cuba emergency is our emergency” to Washington, the U.S. would not respond with polite export controls. It would call it a national security threat, sanction everyone involved, send warships, threaten regime change, and may even kidnap that leader and his family within a week, drag them back to the United States, and try them on drug trafficking charges. Trump attacked Iran for months under the excuse that Iran must not even have the chance to build a nuclear weapon. Iran did not say “Cuba is our emergency.” Iran did not invade the U.S. Iran did not station forces near Florida. Yet Washington bombed Tehran, assassinated Khamenei, blockaded Hormuz, and called it security. Japan, meanwhile, openly links itself to Taiwan, challenges China’s sovereignty, pushes remilitarization, flirts with nuclear ambitions, and then cries when China restricts dual-use exports. Japan should understand one thing very clearly: China’s economic measures are restraint. Perhaps too restrained. That is exactly why Japan dares to challenge China’s core red lines of sovereignty again and again. In the end, a defeated militarist power does not get to threaten the victorious country, interfere in its territorial question, and then demand uninterrupted access to strategic materials. If Japan wants stable relations with China, it should stop pretending dialogue means China staying silent while Tokyo rearms, provokes, and hides behind the G7. China is indeed not the United States. That is why Japan is still being warned through economic tools instead of being treated the way Washington treats countries that cross its red lines.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

23,164 views • 2 months ago

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,226 views • 28 days ago

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Predictive History

35,185 views • 3 months ago

SEN. SHAHEEN: What we are hearing from our sources is the President does not want to notice the arms sale to Taiwan before he goes to China. Well, what better time to notice it? Because that sends a very strong message that China should keep its mitts off Taiwan.

SEN. SHAHEEN: What we are hearing from our sources is the President does not want to notice the arms sale to Taiwan before he goes to China. Well, what better time to notice it? Because that sends a very strong message that China should keep its mitts off Taiwan.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee

11,416 views • 3 months ago

🚨 President Trump just went FULL ART OF THE DEAL MODE, he's using the yet-to-be-approved $12B in arms to Taiwan as a bargaining chip with Xi! "He thinks I could do it with the signing of my signature. I am holding that. It depends on China. It's a VERY good negotiating chip for us, frankly! It's a LOT of weapons, $12B." "I may do it. I may not do it. But we're not looking to have wars." "And if you kept it the way it is, I think China's going to be okay with that." "But when you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful big country. That's a very small island. Think of it. 59 miles, we're 9,500 miles away."

🚨 President Trump just went FULL ART OF THE DEAL MODE, he's using the yet-to-be-approved $12B in arms to Taiwan as a bargaining chip with Xi! "He thinks I could do it with the signing of my signature. I am holding that. It depends on China. It's a VERY good negotiating chip for us, frankly! It's a LOT of weapons, $12B." "I may do it. I may not do it. But we're not looking to have wars." "And if you kept it the way it is, I think China's going to be okay with that." "But when you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful big country. That's a very small island. Think of it. 59 miles, we're 9,500 miles away."

Eric Daugherty

114,725 views • 3 months ago

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

42,805 views • 9 months ago

China is being dragged into the Iran deal, and it’s not accidental. Here is why Iran wants China to take credit for the ceasefire. Oil crashed. Markets surged. And suddenly China’s name is everywhere in the Iran ceasefire story. But here’s the twist: Beijing hasn’t confirmed anything. So why is Iran pushing the narrative that China helped broker the deal? In this video, I break down what really happened on April 8, how Trump turned this into three strategic wins, and why Iran may be trying to pull China into the negotiation game.

China is being dragged into the Iran deal, and it’s not accidental. Here is why Iran wants China to take credit for the ceasefire. Oil crashed. Markets surged. And suddenly China’s name is everywhere in the Iran ceasefire story. But here’s the twist: Beijing hasn’t confirmed anything. So why is Iran pushing the narrative that China helped broker the deal? In this video, I break down what really happened on April 8, how Trump turned this into three strategic wins, and why Iran may be trying to pull China into the negotiation game.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

28,621 views • 4 months ago

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,030 views • 1 month ago

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

Global Strategy

91,558 views • 1 year ago

WATCH 🔴 Famous Chinese influencer “Master Ran” claims Jews are “inherently evil” and control the U.S., saying the real conflict is not with America but with Jewish influence. He warns that China may not be able to resist what he calls a “Jewish cultural invasion.”

WATCH 🔴 Famous Chinese influencer “Master Ran” claims Jews are “inherently evil” and control the U.S., saying the real conflict is not with America but with Jewish influence. He warns that China may not be able to resist what he calls a “Jewish cultural invasion.”

Open Source Intel

114,190 views • 1 year ago