Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 CHINA'S 58-DAY COLLAPSE 🚨 Peter Schweizer breaks down Trump's strategic masterclass: → Venezuela's Maduro regime stunted → Iran's military installations destroyed → Chinese air defense systems obliterated (0 U.S. losses) → Beijing loses 20-25% of energy supply → Strait of Hormuz now controlled by Trump "China's the big... show more

Government Accountability Institute

9,959 subscribers

39,310 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇨🇳 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐚 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝟓𝟖 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬. Trump eliminated Venezuela and Iran as Beijing's energy suppliers. Huawei and ZTE forfeited tens of billions in contracts. Chinese air defense systems got obliterated without downing a single U.S. aircraft. Now Trump controls the Strait of Hormuz. Half of China's oil flows through that chokepoint. Beijing enters negotiations powerless. Peter Schweizer breaks down China's strategic collapse alongside Jesse Watters on Fox News. 👇

🇨🇳 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐚 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝟓𝟖 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬. Trump eliminated Venezuela and Iran as Beijing's energy suppliers. Huawei and ZTE forfeited tens of billions in contracts. Chinese air defense systems got obliterated without downing a single U.S. aircraft. Now Trump controls the Strait of Hormuz. Half of China's oil flows through that chokepoint. Beijing enters negotiations powerless. Peter Schweizer breaks down China's strategic collapse alongside Jesse Watters on Fox News. 👇

Government Accountability Institute

67,572 views • 5 months ago

🚨 Peter Schweizer 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐀'𝐒 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍 𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 China armed Iran with advanced missiles. Every warhead carries Chinese components. The guidance systems. The propellant chemistry. The technical expertise. Trump is destroying the entire operation. 👉𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐏𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐃: 🔸China provided air defense systems to Iran. US and Israeli strikes decimated them. 🔸China invested $100B+ in Iranian infrastructure. Those investments are gone. 🔸Iran and Venezuela supplied 20% of China's oil at discount prices. Trump eliminated both sources. 🔸China paid in yuan to avoid US dollars. Now Beijing must buy oil with American currency. 🔸40% of Chinese oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump controls that chokepoint. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐂 𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐅𝐓: Beijing wanted to move on Taiwan. Now any military action creates an energy crisis. The Strait of Hormuz becomes a kill switch. You remember 2020. China threatened to withhold PPE during COVID. You remember the rare earth threats. Trump reversed all of Beijing's leverage. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘: Hudson Institute data shows Chinese components accelerated Iranian production to 5,000 missiles by 2027. Projections show 10,000 by 2030. These are precision weapons that strike targets across the Middle East. Beijing built this arsenal while condemning regional conflicts publicly. Spring negotiations with President Xi approach. Trump holds every advantage. Watch the full discussion on Fox News with Laura Ingraham. 👇

🚨 Peter Schweizer 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐀'𝐒 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍 𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 China armed Iran with advanced missiles. Every warhead carries Chinese components. The guidance systems. The propellant chemistry. The technical expertise. Trump is destroying the entire operation. 👉𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐏𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐃: 🔸China provided air defense systems to Iran. US and Israeli strikes decimated them. 🔸China invested $100B+ in Iranian infrastructure. Those investments are gone. 🔸Iran and Venezuela supplied 20% of China's oil at discount prices. Trump eliminated both sources. 🔸China paid in yuan to avoid US dollars. Now Beijing must buy oil with American currency. 🔸40% of Chinese oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump controls that chokepoint. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐂 𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐅𝐓: Beijing wanted to move on Taiwan. Now any military action creates an energy crisis. The Strait of Hormuz becomes a kill switch. You remember 2020. China threatened to withhold PPE during COVID. You remember the rare earth threats. Trump reversed all of Beijing's leverage. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘: Hudson Institute data shows Chinese components accelerated Iranian production to 5,000 missiles by 2027. Projections show 10,000 by 2030. These are precision weapons that strike targets across the Middle East. Beijing built this arsenal while condemning regional conflicts publicly. Spring negotiations with President Xi approach. Trump holds every advantage. Watch the full discussion on Fox News with Laura Ingraham. 👇

Government Accountability Institute

215,220 views • 5 months ago

It's NOT about Iran. It's about... China. Missiles raining on Tehran right now—U.S. & Israel just launched massive joint strikes (Tehran explosions, Khamenei reportedly targeted/killed per Trump/Israel claims—Iran denies). Iran firing back at Israel & U.S. bases across the Gulf. But 4,000 miles east, Beijing is sweating hardest. Trump's play chokes China's oil lifeline: Strait of Hormuz disrupted → oil prices surging → China's economy (world's top importer) takes the hit. Perfect leverage on trade, tariffs, tech, Taiwan. The "Iran bluff" was never ground troops. It was always the proxy war: 🔻 Regime change optics mask the real target. 🔻 Middle East chaos spikes energy costs China can't afford. 🔻 Oil shock hits markets first (already happening). 🔻 Panic trades = winners in energy/defense stocks. 🔻 Tariffs + domestic pressure timed perfectly. 🔻 Global dominance doctrine: Iran as pressure valve on China. World fixates on Tehran fireworks. Smart players watch Beijing's next move. 🔗 Full deep-dive episode + Strait maps in bio. What’s your read—proxy for China or full regime topple? Drop below👇 #IranStrikes #China #OilCrisis #Geopolitics #Trump

It's NOT about Iran. It's about... China. Missiles raining on Tehran right now—U.S. & Israel just launched massive joint strikes (Tehran explosions, Khamenei reportedly targeted/killed per Trump/Israel claims—Iran denies). Iran firing back at Israel & U.S. bases across the Gulf. But 4,000 miles east, Beijing is sweating hardest. Trump's play chokes China's oil lifeline: Strait of Hormuz disrupted → oil prices surging → China's economy (world's top importer) takes the hit. Perfect leverage on trade, tariffs, tech, Taiwan. The "Iran bluff" was never ground troops. It was always the proxy war: 🔻 Regime change optics mask the real target. 🔻 Middle East chaos spikes energy costs China can't afford. 🔻 Oil shock hits markets first (already happening). 🔻 Panic trades = winners in energy/defense stocks. 🔻 Tariffs + domestic pressure timed perfectly. 🔻 Global dominance doctrine: Iran as pressure valve on China. World fixates on Tehran fireworks. Smart players watch Beijing's next move. 🔗 Full deep-dive episode + Strait maps in bio. What’s your read—proxy for China or full regime topple? Drop below👇 #IranStrikes #China #OilCrisis #Geopolitics #Trump

NEXTA

222,768 views • 5 months ago

🚨 Trump Issues Strategic Warning to Beijing President Donald Trump has delivered a clear message to China regarding the security of one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints. If Beijing does not assist in protecting the Strait of Hormuz, Trump says he may postpone his planned visit to China scheduled for March 31. His reasoning was direct. “I think China should also help us because it gets 90 percent of its oil from this strait.” The warning highlights the growing pressure on major global powers to contribute to the protection of international shipping routes as tensions escalate with Iran. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply, making it one of the most strategically important waterways on the planet. Washington’s message is increasingly blunt: If nations rely on the route for energy, they should also help defend it.

🚨 Trump Issues Strategic Warning to Beijing President Donald Trump has delivered a clear message to China regarding the security of one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints. If Beijing does not assist in protecting the Strait of Hormuz, Trump says he may postpone his planned visit to China scheduled for March 31. His reasoning was direct. “I think China should also help us because it gets 90 percent of its oil from this strait.” The warning highlights the growing pressure on major global powers to contribute to the protection of international shipping routes as tensions escalate with Iran. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply, making it one of the most strategically important waterways on the planet. Washington’s message is increasingly blunt: If nations rely on the route for energy, they should also help defend it.

Jim Ferguson

351,967 views • 4 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Sources are suggesting China may be preparing to move on Taiwan. Unverified. 🚨 🚨 ENERGY WARFARE: Could This Trigger a Global Conflagration? 🚨 🇨🇳🇮🇷🇺🇸 A silent red line may have just been crossed. The U.S. and Israel are edging closer to crippling Iran’s oil infrastructure — and China is watching. Why does this matter? 🔻 China is Iran’s largest oil customer 🔻 Over 1 million barrels a day flow into Chinese ports 🔻 This lifeline fuels both economies — and geopolitical ambitions If Iranian oil is wiped from the map, Beijing doesn’t just lose cheap crude — It loses leverage. This isn't just a conflict in the Gulf — it’s energy warfare, and China may see it as a direct assault on its national interests. Could this be the spark that accelerates their plans for Taiwan? Could the U.S. find itself in two simultaneous global flashpoints? The Strait of Hormuz is heating up. The South China Sea is on edge. The chessboard is set. 🧠 Stay awake. Stay prepared. 🌍 The era of regional wars is over. This is going global.

🚨BREAKING: Sources are suggesting China may be preparing to move on Taiwan. Unverified. 🚨 🚨 ENERGY WARFARE: Could This Trigger a Global Conflagration? 🚨 🇨🇳🇮🇷🇺🇸 A silent red line may have just been crossed. The U.S. and Israel are edging closer to crippling Iran’s oil infrastructure — and China is watching. Why does this matter? 🔻 China is Iran’s largest oil customer 🔻 Over 1 million barrels a day flow into Chinese ports 🔻 This lifeline fuels both economies — and geopolitical ambitions If Iranian oil is wiped from the map, Beijing doesn’t just lose cheap crude — It loses leverage. This isn't just a conflict in the Gulf — it’s energy warfare, and China may see it as a direct assault on its national interests. Could this be the spark that accelerates their plans for Taiwan? Could the U.S. find itself in two simultaneous global flashpoints? The Strait of Hormuz is heating up. The South China Sea is on edge. The chessboard is set. 🧠 Stay awake. Stay prepared. 🌍 The era of regional wars is over. This is going global.

Jim Ferguson

128,944 views • 1 year ago

Bessent just connected every dot,like I wrote i my latest article. China bought 90% of Iran's oil exports. That's almost 10% of China's total imports. Now the blockade cuts it off. And the US is warning Chinese banks: process Iranian payments = secondary sanctions. This isn't just an energy blockade. It's a financial one too. 🇮🇷 Iran loses its only real customer 🇨🇳 China loses its cheapest oil source 🏦 Chinese banks face secondary sanctions risk 💸 Iran's $400M/day bleeding accelerates 🛢️ Chinese imports already spiking +20% y/y Bessent called China "unreliable" for hoarding oil during the war instead of sharing with allies. Trump said "Xi needs oil. We don't." Now the Treasury is closing the financial escape hatch too. Water blockade + Financial blockade... Simultaneously. The summit just got a lot more complicated. Full breakdown in my latest article 👇

Bessent just connected every dot,like I wrote i my latest article. China bought 90% of Iran's oil exports. That's almost 10% of China's total imports. Now the blockade cuts it off. And the US is warning Chinese banks: process Iranian payments = secondary sanctions. This isn't just an energy blockade. It's a financial one too. 🇮🇷 Iran loses its only real customer 🇨🇳 China loses its cheapest oil source 🏦 Chinese banks face secondary sanctions risk 💸 Iran's $400M/day bleeding accelerates 🛢️ Chinese imports already spiking +20% y/y Bessent called China "unreliable" for hoarding oil during the war instead of sharing with allies. Trump said "Xi needs oil. We don't." Now the Treasury is closing the financial escape hatch too. Water blockade + Financial blockade... Simultaneously. The summit just got a lot more complicated. Full breakdown in my latest article 👇

Jack Prandelli

528,720 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BOOM: TRUMP IS ABOUT TO GO AMERICA FIRST IN CHINA Democrats are already MELTING DOWN at the thought of President Trump scoring another historic meeting with President Xi, showcasing his strength on the world stage They don't want to watch the Chinese roll out a grand welcome for 47 in a show of respect! "President Trump will only be in China a short time, landing Wednesday, leaving on Friday. But in that short period of time, the White House is hoping to show a lot of progress on a number of different fronts." "President Xi also wants the fighting to stop, as Middle East turmoil restricts China's oil supply and shrinks the ability to buy Chinese goods."

🚨 BOOM: TRUMP IS ABOUT TO GO AMERICA FIRST IN CHINA Democrats are already MELTING DOWN at the thought of President Trump scoring another historic meeting with President Xi, showcasing his strength on the world stage They don't want to watch the Chinese roll out a grand welcome for 47 in a show of respect! "President Trump will only be in China a short time, landing Wednesday, leaving on Friday. But in that short period of time, the White House is hoping to show a lot of progress on a number of different fronts." "President Xi also wants the fighting to stop, as Middle East turmoil restricts China's oil supply and shrinks the ability to buy Chinese goods."

Eric Daugherty

39,557 views • 2 months ago

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 IRAN IS TOO BIG FOR THE U.S. TO DESTROY Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson says the U.S. doesn't have the air capability to bomb Iran into submission. It's too big with too much embedded infrastructure. The U.S. controlled Afghanistan for 20 years and couldn't win. Iran is much bigger. Larry's take: The U.S. dropped more bombs on Vietnam than on Japan and Germany in WWII combined, and the Vietnamese still won. Iran's real leverage isn't military, it's the Strait of Hormuz. Gulf Arabs are going to have to align with Iran as the regional military power now because if they try to fight Iran, they'll lose. He says that ground operations would require inserting troops via aircraft into Iranian territory, and the losses would be catastrophic. Larry C Johnson

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 IRAN IS TOO BIG FOR THE U.S. TO DESTROY Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson says the U.S. doesn't have the air capability to bomb Iran into submission. It's too big with too much embedded infrastructure. The U.S. controlled Afghanistan for 20 years and couldn't win. Iran is much bigger. Larry's take: The U.S. dropped more bombs on Vietnam than on Japan and Germany in WWII combined, and the Vietnamese still won. Iran's real leverage isn't military, it's the Strait of Hormuz. Gulf Arabs are going to have to align with Iran as the regional military power now because if they try to fight Iran, they'll lose. He says that ground operations would require inserting troops via aircraft into Iranian territory, and the losses would be catastrophic. Larry C Johnson

Mario Nawfal

89,382 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸🇨🇳🇮🇷 U.S. Navy blockade on Iranian ports is holding strong, and this hits China the hardest No Iranian oil is flowing out for 48+ hours... and Beijing was sucking up ~90-98% of Iran's crude (over 1.3M barrels/day, ~13% of China's seaborne imports) at steep discounts. Now China’s scrambling: higher global oil prices, disrupted cheap supply, and a direct squeeze on their energy security while they preach "fragile ceasefire." Beijing calls it “dangerous,” but this is leverage: the same regime propping up Iran with shadow fleet tankers and yuan deals is feeling the pain in its own economy. Short-term headache for China’s factories and growth. Long-term reminder that over-reliance on risky partners and shadow trade has limits when the U.S. Navy shows up. Source: Reuters, NY Times

🇺🇸🇨🇳🇮🇷 U.S. Navy blockade on Iranian ports is holding strong, and this hits China the hardest No Iranian oil is flowing out for 48+ hours... and Beijing was sucking up ~90-98% of Iran's crude (over 1.3M barrels/day, ~13% of China's seaborne imports) at steep discounts. Now China’s scrambling: higher global oil prices, disrupted cheap supply, and a direct squeeze on their energy security while they preach "fragile ceasefire." Beijing calls it “dangerous,” but this is leverage: the same regime propping up Iran with shadow fleet tankers and yuan deals is feeling the pain in its own economy. Short-term headache for China’s factories and growth. Long-term reminder that over-reliance on risky partners and shadow trade has limits when the U.S. Navy shows up. Source: Reuters, NY Times

Mario Nawfal

59,119 views • 3 months ago

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.

The SCIF

44,307 views • 18 days ago

In Depth Analysis on The Road to WAR With Iran... HOW We Got Here and What Happens Next! Myron Gaines ⏲️TIME STAMPS⏲️ 00:00 - Introduction to Middle East Conflict and Israel's Role 03:43 - Israel's Avoidance of the Palestine Question 04:13 - Abraham Accords: Arab Recognition of Israel (2020) 08:45 - Israel's Policy and the Fall of the Middle East 14:40 - October 7th Attacks and the Hannibal Directive 16:39 - Israel's Destruction of Gaza Post-October 7 22:13 - Middle East Countries' Involvement in Conflict 27:44 - Israel's Sneak Attack on Iran's Air Defense 35:16 - Iran's Response and Military Buildup After 12-Day War 36:40 - US Sanctions on Iran and Russia: Effectiveness Questioned 43:18 - US Air Superiority Challenged by Russia and China 48:22 - Iran's Deal for Supersonic Anti-Ship Missiles from China 53:36 - Venezuela's Proximity to US and Military Weakness 56:00 - China's Oil Interests in the Strait of Hormuz 58:13 - China's Strategic Support for Iran Against the West 1:00:32 - Trump's State of the Union on Iran Avoiding War 1:05:03 - US Hesitation to Attack Iran Due to Potential Costs 1:09:47 - War with Iran: Unfavorable Outcomes for the US

In Depth Analysis on The Road to WAR With Iran... HOW We Got Here and What Happens Next! Myron Gaines ⏲️TIME STAMPS⏲️ 00:00 - Introduction to Middle East Conflict and Israel's Role 03:43 - Israel's Avoidance of the Palestine Question 04:13 - Abraham Accords: Arab Recognition of Israel (2020) 08:45 - Israel's Policy and the Fall of the Middle East 14:40 - October 7th Attacks and the Hannibal Directive 16:39 - Israel's Destruction of Gaza Post-October 7 22:13 - Middle East Countries' Involvement in Conflict 27:44 - Israel's Sneak Attack on Iran's Air Defense 35:16 - Iran's Response and Military Buildup After 12-Day War 36:40 - US Sanctions on Iran and Russia: Effectiveness Questioned 43:18 - US Air Superiority Challenged by Russia and China 48:22 - Iran's Deal for Supersonic Anti-Ship Missiles from China 53:36 - Venezuela's Proximity to US and Military Weakness 56:00 - China's Oil Interests in the Strait of Hormuz 58:13 - China's Strategic Support for Iran Against the West 1:00:32 - Trump's State of the Union on Iran Avoiding War 1:05:03 - US Hesitation to Attack Iran Due to Potential Costs 1:09:47 - War with Iran: Unfavorable Outcomes for the US

Myron Gaines Clips

66,453 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪🇨🇳 CHINA ACCUSES U.S. OF STEALING ITS OIL AFTER TRUMP DIVERTS VENEZUELAN CRUDE TO AMERICA China is livid, and they’re not hiding it. After Trump announced the U.S. will refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil previously frozen under sanctions, Beijing fired back, calling the move a blatant power grab and a direct hit on their interests. Why? Because that oil wasn’t just sitting there, China had already paid for a big chunk of it, through loan-for-oil deals and state-backed agreements with Maduro’s regime. Trump’s plan? Ignore all that, break the blockade, grab the barrels, and reroute them to U.S. refineries. The pitch: American energy security, because the U.S. is in charge now. This is also about who gets to call the shots in Venezuela post-Maduro, and right now, Beijing just got boxed out while Washington takes over the chessboard. It’s a high-stakes geopolitical standoff over energy, influence, and who controls Latin America’s future. China just lost billions in oil access, but the U.S. just cashed in. Source: Reuters

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪🇨🇳 CHINA ACCUSES U.S. OF STEALING ITS OIL AFTER TRUMP DIVERTS VENEZUELAN CRUDE TO AMERICA China is livid, and they’re not hiding it. After Trump announced the U.S. will refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil previously frozen under sanctions, Beijing fired back, calling the move a blatant power grab and a direct hit on their interests. Why? Because that oil wasn’t just sitting there, China had already paid for a big chunk of it, through loan-for-oil deals and state-backed agreements with Maduro’s regime. Trump’s plan? Ignore all that, break the blockade, grab the barrels, and reroute them to U.S. refineries. The pitch: American energy security, because the U.S. is in charge now. This is also about who gets to call the shots in Venezuela post-Maduro, and right now, Beijing just got boxed out while Washington takes over the chessboard. It’s a high-stakes geopolitical standoff over energy, influence, and who controls Latin America’s future. China just lost billions in oil access, but the U.S. just cashed in. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

2,227,348 views • 7 months ago

🚨 IRAN IS ON THE BRINK OF ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, and even CHINA is panicking! WATTERS: "If Xi calls the gay Ayatollah and tells him to beg for mercy, he'll beg for mercy!" "Beijing knows when it's over. Iran can't lose its sugar daddy, and China's not going to watch its favorite gas station go bankrupt. The ChiComs already lost one proxy, Venezuela." "[Iran's] currency is about to COLLAPSE, and they're already staring down the barrel of hyperinflation." "Their ghost fleet has been suctioning up all that cheap, sanctioned Iranian oil, and now that supply's dried up. It's starting to bite, because for the first time Xi Jinping weighed in on the war, and he called the blockade, 'dangerous and irresponsible.'" "That's when you know it's working." "The Strait was the Iranians' LAST card to play, and they're LOSING it. Our ships just went up the gut, and the mullahs didn't do a thing about it!" "We thought the Houthis might join the fight, but they stayed on the sidelines. Now we're squeezing Iranian heads to the wall!" This is SUCH A MASTERCLASS

🚨 IRAN IS ON THE BRINK OF ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, and even CHINA is panicking! WATTERS: "If Xi calls the gay Ayatollah and tells him to beg for mercy, he'll beg for mercy!" "Beijing knows when it's over. Iran can't lose its sugar daddy, and China's not going to watch its favorite gas station go bankrupt. The ChiComs already lost one proxy, Venezuela." "[Iran's] currency is about to COLLAPSE, and they're already staring down the barrel of hyperinflation." "Their ghost fleet has been suctioning up all that cheap, sanctioned Iranian oil, and now that supply's dried up. It's starting to bite, because for the first time Xi Jinping weighed in on the war, and he called the blockade, 'dangerous and irresponsible.'" "That's when you know it's working." "The Strait was the Iranians' LAST card to play, and they're LOSING it. Our ships just went up the gut, and the mullahs didn't do a thing about it!" "We thought the Houthis might join the fight, but they stayed on the sidelines. Now we're squeezing Iranian heads to the wall!" This is SUCH A MASTERCLASS

Eric Daugherty

677,654 views • 3 months ago

🚨 DONALD TRUMP IS NOW CORNERING CHINA "China's watched their proxy in Venezuela get flown in his PJs to a jail cell in Manhattan." "Their other proxy in Iran got whacked in the first 40 SECONDS of the war." "2 countries Beijing can't buy cheap sanctioned oil from anymore. Now they have to pay FULL PRICE. And now they're buying a lot more from US!" "They're also watching the U.S. Navy gain footholds in trade choke points that their country relies on for survival." "And what kind of allies are China if they can't even lift a finger to help their friends?" "Iran's the world's number one state sponsor of terrorism, and without money, their terror proxies aren't getting paid." — Jesse Watters I voted for this. What a masterclass 🇺🇸

🚨 DONALD TRUMP IS NOW CORNERING CHINA "China's watched their proxy in Venezuela get flown in his PJs to a jail cell in Manhattan." "Their other proxy in Iran got whacked in the first 40 SECONDS of the war." "2 countries Beijing can't buy cheap sanctioned oil from anymore. Now they have to pay FULL PRICE. And now they're buying a lot more from US!" "They're also watching the U.S. Navy gain footholds in trade choke points that their country relies on for survival." "And what kind of allies are China if they can't even lift a finger to help their friends?" "Iran's the world's number one state sponsor of terrorism, and without money, their terror proxies aren't getting paid." — Jesse Watters I voted for this. What a masterclass 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

422,641 views • 3 months ago

Operation Epic Fury’s geopolitical ramifications has China between a rock and a hard place, with Iran being their oil vendor it leaves them on the sidelines with little recourse, the $1 million question is when the CCP gets desperate for the massive amounts of energy reserves they require is, what moves/options they actually have ? Much of the EU depends on Russia for their energy but China and Russia are next-door neighbors, I think we are witnessing a massive realignment in energy trade that may very well leave the EU out in the cold. ⏺️ Energy Security Vulnerabilities Exposed: The clip underscores China's heavy reliance on Middle Eastern oil imports (over 10 million barrels daily), making it susceptible to U.S.-influenced disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz; this could lead to supply shortages, higher prices, and economic instability, prompting China to accelerate diversification efforts like the Belt and Road Initiative for alternative routes. ⏺️ Escalation of U.S.-China Rivalry: By framing U.S. actions against Iran as indirectly targeting China's industrial base, the narrative highlights a proxy dimension to great-power competition; this could intensify tensions, pushing China toward stronger alliances with Iran and Russia to counter U.S. naval dominance and secure energy corridors. ⏺️ Strategic Incentives for Military Buildup: The emphasis on U.S. "pressure without war" via naval control may accelerate China's naval modernization (e.g., expanding its blue-water fleet and anti-access/area denial capabilities) to challenge U.S. influence in key chokepoints, potentially leading to heightened militarization in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. ⏺️ Economic Leverage and Trade Impacts: Disruptions to Iranian oil (a key supplier) could raise global energy costs, affecting China's manufacturing exports and GDP growth; this might encourage Beijing to deepen domestic energy reforms, invest in renewables, or use economic tools like yuan-denominated oil trades to reduce dollar dependence and U.S. financial leverage. ⏺️ Diplomatic Realignments: The reel suggests U.S. strategies weaken rivals without direct conflict, which could drive China to bolster multilateral forums (e.g., SCO, BRICS) for collective resistance against U.S. unilateralism, while straining U.S.-China relations and complicating global issues like climate talks or non-proliferation efforts. ⏺️ Risk of Broader Instability: If U.S. pressures lead to Iranian instability or regional conflicts, China could face

Operation Epic Fury’s geopolitical ramifications has China between a rock and a hard place, with Iran being their oil vendor it leaves them on the sidelines with little recourse, the $1 million question is when the CCP gets desperate for the massive amounts of energy reserves they require is, what moves/options they actually have ? Much of the EU depends on Russia for their energy but China and Russia are next-door neighbors, I think we are witnessing a massive realignment in energy trade that may very well leave the EU out in the cold. ⏺️ Energy Security Vulnerabilities Exposed: The clip underscores China's heavy reliance on Middle Eastern oil imports (over 10 million barrels daily), making it susceptible to U.S.-influenced disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz; this could lead to supply shortages, higher prices, and economic instability, prompting China to accelerate diversification efforts like the Belt and Road Initiative for alternative routes. ⏺️ Escalation of U.S.-China Rivalry: By framing U.S. actions against Iran as indirectly targeting China's industrial base, the narrative highlights a proxy dimension to great-power competition; this could intensify tensions, pushing China toward stronger alliances with Iran and Russia to counter U.S. naval dominance and secure energy corridors. ⏺️ Strategic Incentives for Military Buildup: The emphasis on U.S. "pressure without war" via naval control may accelerate China's naval modernization (e.g., expanding its blue-water fleet and anti-access/area denial capabilities) to challenge U.S. influence in key chokepoints, potentially leading to heightened militarization in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. ⏺️ Economic Leverage and Trade Impacts: Disruptions to Iranian oil (a key supplier) could raise global energy costs, affecting China's manufacturing exports and GDP growth; this might encourage Beijing to deepen domestic energy reforms, invest in renewables, or use economic tools like yuan-denominated oil trades to reduce dollar dependence and U.S. financial leverage. ⏺️ Diplomatic Realignments: The reel suggests U.S. strategies weaken rivals without direct conflict, which could drive China to bolster multilateral forums (e.g., SCO, BRICS) for collective resistance against U.S. unilateralism, while straining U.S.-China relations and complicating global issues like climate talks or non-proliferation efforts. ⏺️ Risk of Broader Instability: If U.S. pressures lead to Iranian instability or regional conflicts, China could face

ℳ𝒜𝒢𝒜_𝒳_𝒯𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒟𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎 𝒩𝑒𝓌𝓈🇺🇸

12,358 views • 4 months ago

COMPLETE BREAKDOWN: Why U.S. Forces Are Surging Toward Iran RIGHT NOW — Full WAR-RISK Analysis! Myron Gaines 00:00 - Netanyahu's Tweet on Meeting Trump About Iran 02:14 - Netanyahu's Seventh Visit to the US Since Trump Took Office 11:23 - Israel's Response to Hamas Invasion on October 7th 19:15 - Israel's Role in Destroying Iran's Proxies 26:10 - Operation Rising Lion: Israel-Iran War 37:23 - Trump's Tweet on Iran Executing Protesters 40:51 - China's New Radar to Detect Stealth Aircraft 43:23 - China Upgrades HQ9B Air Defense System 45:51 - Chinese Radar Detects Stealth at Long Distances 49:06 - Iran's Military Competency and Air Defense 56:42 - Political Risks of US Casualties in Iran Conflict 57:37 - China's J20 Stealth Fighter Introduction 1:08:08 - US and Israel Capability to Destroy Iran 1:15:33 - Iran Unveils Fatah Supersonic Missile 1:21:58 - Fatah Missile: A Nightmare for Defenses 1:25:06 - Iran's Potential 2,000 Ballistic Missiles 1:28:07 - Explaining Proxies to Understand the Deal

COMPLETE BREAKDOWN: Why U.S. Forces Are Surging Toward Iran RIGHT NOW — Full WAR-RISK Analysis! Myron Gaines 00:00 - Netanyahu's Tweet on Meeting Trump About Iran 02:14 - Netanyahu's Seventh Visit to the US Since Trump Took Office 11:23 - Israel's Response to Hamas Invasion on October 7th 19:15 - Israel's Role in Destroying Iran's Proxies 26:10 - Operation Rising Lion: Israel-Iran War 37:23 - Trump's Tweet on Iran Executing Protesters 40:51 - China's New Radar to Detect Stealth Aircraft 43:23 - China Upgrades HQ9B Air Defense System 45:51 - Chinese Radar Detects Stealth at Long Distances 49:06 - Iran's Military Competency and Air Defense 56:42 - Political Risks of US Casualties in Iran Conflict 57:37 - China's J20 Stealth Fighter Introduction 1:08:08 - US and Israel Capability to Destroy Iran 1:15:33 - Iran Unveils Fatah Supersonic Missile 1:21:58 - Fatah Missile: A Nightmare for Defenses 1:25:06 - Iran's Potential 2,000 Ballistic Missiles 1:28:07 - Explaining Proxies to Understand the Deal

Myron Gaines Clips

29,871 views • 5 months ago

‼️🇹🇼🇺🇲🇨🇳 BIG | The U.S. National Security Strategy Establishes the Principle of “Defending Taiwan” — says Su Ziyun, Head of Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security. Based on his analysis of the document, Su notes that the United States is shifting from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity regarding Taiwan’s defense. The priority of the Taiwan issue in Washington’s policy is increasing, while the main emphasis is moving toward collective defense mechanisms and preventing any attempt to change the status quo by force. For the first time, the U.S. strategy includes a direct formulation declaring the seizure of Taiwan by any specific state unacceptable — and the document no longer contains the traditional references to the “One China Policy” that appeared under previous administrations. Although China is not openly criticized in the strategy, the text implicitly reflects a containment approach: Beijing is described as the only actor possessing both the intent and the capabilities to alter the global order. For comparison: Trump’s first National Defense Strategy mentioned Taiwan three times, Biden’s document five times, while the new strategy refers to Taiwan eight times. Su Ziyun also emphasizes that the entire “Trump 2.0” team is strongly anti-communist. According to him, despite Trump’s sharp rhetoric, his decision-making circle fully recognizes Taiwan’s geopolitical value. The incorporation of the “Taiwan Assurance Act” into domestic U.S. law has practically eliminated the so-called “anti-Americanism theory.” Su further highlights public sentiment in Taiwan: according to surveys, up to 40% of Taiwanese citizens are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country, and around 70% are ready to go to war. These are among the highest levels seen in democratic states and, in Su’s view, demonstrate the reliability and mobilization capacity of Taiwanese society. The remaining challenge concerns the governing party’s communication skills. As Su Ziyun states: “Taiwan is not hostile to China — the Chinese Communist Party is hostile to democracy.” He urges the opposition to take the “correct historical position,” support the defense budget, and show the world that Taiwan’s democracy is maturing and ready to assume responsibility for its own security. Only in this way, he argues, can Taiwan establish a positive cycle of cooperation with its allies. Ultimately, the publication of the U.S. National Security Strategy shows that Taiwan has now been fully integrated into the American strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific region. The frequent mentions of Taiwan, references to “collective defense,” and the omission of the “One China” phrase all illustrate the deepening of Washington’s involvement. Taiwan’s leadership interprets the new strategy as confirmation of U.S. guarantees, which further strengthens its political reliance on Washington. The internal Taiwanese discourse is increasingly shaped by American assessments — from defining threats to military standards and defense-budget requirements. Taiwan is effectively adopting the American strategic logic of regional confrontation with China: it is strengthening its armed forces according to U.S. expectations, deepening cooperation with the Pentagon, and aligning political rhetoric with American interests, which in turn heightens tensions with Beijing. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇹🇼🇺🇲🇨🇳 BIG | The U.S. National Security Strategy Establishes the Principle of “Defending Taiwan” — says Su Ziyun, Head of Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security. Based on his analysis of the document, Su notes that the United States is shifting from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity regarding Taiwan’s defense. The priority of the Taiwan issue in Washington’s policy is increasing, while the main emphasis is moving toward collective defense mechanisms and preventing any attempt to change the status quo by force. For the first time, the U.S. strategy includes a direct formulation declaring the seizure of Taiwan by any specific state unacceptable — and the document no longer contains the traditional references to the “One China Policy” that appeared under previous administrations. Although China is not openly criticized in the strategy, the text implicitly reflects a containment approach: Beijing is described as the only actor possessing both the intent and the capabilities to alter the global order. For comparison: Trump’s first National Defense Strategy mentioned Taiwan three times, Biden’s document five times, while the new strategy refers to Taiwan eight times. Su Ziyun also emphasizes that the entire “Trump 2.0” team is strongly anti-communist. According to him, despite Trump’s sharp rhetoric, his decision-making circle fully recognizes Taiwan’s geopolitical value. The incorporation of the “Taiwan Assurance Act” into domestic U.S. law has practically eliminated the so-called “anti-Americanism theory.” Su further highlights public sentiment in Taiwan: according to surveys, up to 40% of Taiwanese citizens are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country, and around 70% are ready to go to war. These are among the highest levels seen in democratic states and, in Su’s view, demonstrate the reliability and mobilization capacity of Taiwanese society. The remaining challenge concerns the governing party’s communication skills. As Su Ziyun states: “Taiwan is not hostile to China — the Chinese Communist Party is hostile to democracy.” He urges the opposition to take the “correct historical position,” support the defense budget, and show the world that Taiwan’s democracy is maturing and ready to assume responsibility for its own security. Only in this way, he argues, can Taiwan establish a positive cycle of cooperation with its allies. Ultimately, the publication of the U.S. National Security Strategy shows that Taiwan has now been fully integrated into the American strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific region. The frequent mentions of Taiwan, references to “collective defense,” and the omission of the “One China” phrase all illustrate the deepening of Washington’s involvement. Taiwan’s leadership interprets the new strategy as confirmation of U.S. guarantees, which further strengthens its political reliance on Washington. The internal Taiwanese discourse is increasingly shaped by American assessments — from defining threats to military standards and defense-budget requirements. Taiwan is effectively adopting the American strategic logic of regional confrontation with China: it is strengthening its armed forces according to U.S. expectations, deepening cooperation with the Pentagon, and aligning political rhetoric with American interests, which in turn heightens tensions with Beijing. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

41,074 views • 8 months ago

Prof. Zhang Weiwei: ‘China🇨🇳 is NOT AFRAID of US’🇺🇸 attempts to choke off China’s energy imports with wars on Venezuela and Iran, Beijing prepared TWO DECADES AGO.’ ‘China began to pursue this energy strategy since about two decades ago. As a result, today China’s energy dependency on foreign supply is at maximum 15%. As a result, China can cope with this crisis. So far, it’s okay. Unlike other countries in Asia or in Europe. 52% of energy comes from coal, but it’s already processed green coal, with new technologies. And 20% from renewable energies from green electricity and power, and then the rest from traditional oil and gas. Of this part around 70% is from foreign sources. Yet we have developed different ways of oil supply. Northern line from Russia, western line from Central Asia and the southern line from Myanmar, et cetera. So now the supply diversified. We also have this, very importantly, railway connection between China and Iran. It’s of huge importance for Iran.’ —Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping, and Director of Fudan University’s China Institute Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Prof. Zhang Weiwei: ‘China🇨🇳 is NOT AFRAID of US’🇺🇸 attempts to choke off China’s energy imports with wars on Venezuela and Iran, Beijing prepared TWO DECADES AGO.’ ‘China began to pursue this energy strategy since about two decades ago. As a result, today China’s energy dependency on foreign supply is at maximum 15%. As a result, China can cope with this crisis. So far, it’s okay. Unlike other countries in Asia or in Europe. 52% of energy comes from coal, but it’s already processed green coal, with new technologies. And 20% from renewable energies from green electricity and power, and then the rest from traditional oil and gas. Of this part around 70% is from foreign sources. Yet we have developed different ways of oil supply. Northern line from Russia, western line from Central Asia and the southern line from Myanmar, et cetera. So now the supply diversified. We also have this, very importantly, railway connection between China and Iran. It’s of huge importance for Iran.’ —Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping, and Director of Fudan University’s China Institute Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

48,506 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Xi Jinping just told Trump to his face: "China and the United States both stand to gain from cooperation and lose from confrontation. We should be partners, not rivals." Let that sink in. The same Xi who spent 4 years watching Biden call China "the greatest geopolitical threat of our time." The same Xi who sat through years of sanctions, chip bans, and trade war escalation. The same Xi who said NOTHING like this — ever — to any American president in recent memory. Trump lands in Beijing for the first time since 2017. Walks into the Great Hall of the People. And Xi opens the summit by saying: partners, not rivals. → Not rivals. PARTNERS. → Not a press release. Said directly to Trump's face. → Not a vague diplomatic statement. A clear, deliberate opening. The people who spent 3 years telling you Trump would start World War III with China are very quiet right now. The people who told you confrontation was the only language Beijing understood are very quiet right now. One meeting. One sentence. One moment that rewrites the entire narrative. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🚨 Xi Jinping just told Trump to his face: "China and the United States both stand to gain from cooperation and lose from confrontation. We should be partners, not rivals." Let that sink in. The same Xi who spent 4 years watching Biden call China "the greatest geopolitical threat of our time." The same Xi who sat through years of sanctions, chip bans, and trade war escalation. The same Xi who said NOTHING like this — ever — to any American president in recent memory. Trump lands in Beijing for the first time since 2017. Walks into the Great Hall of the People. And Xi opens the summit by saying: partners, not rivals. → Not rivals. PARTNERS. → Not a press release. Said directly to Trump's face. → Not a vague diplomatic statement. A clear, deliberate opening. The people who spent 3 years telling you Trump would start World War III with China are very quiet right now. The people who told you confrontation was the only language Beijing understood are very quiet right now. One meeting. One sentence. One moment that rewrites the entire narrative. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🇺🇸 Ronald Carter

1,338,725 views • 2 months ago

The Chinese have limited understanding of the West. In recent weeks, Chinese military circles have extensively discussed the U.S. operation in Venezuela, attributing its success primarily to the decapitation of the regime. All Chinese analyses center on the collapse of the defense chain and the subservience that resulted from the leadership vacuum. The Chinese seem almost incapable, at least initially, of considering the reverse scenario: that U.S. intelligence, by infiltrating circles close to Maduro over many months and negotiating compensations, managed to neutralize the entire chain, delivering Maduro in exchange for preserving the governing structure. The Chinese are analyzing the U.S. approach in the context of Taiwan, focusing on decapitation of the central leadership. But suppose the Chinese were willing to spend tens of millions of dollars. Even then, the level of corruption in Taiwan is not comparable to the situation among Venezuela’s military. Although more than 150 people have been indicted since 2020 for spying for China, and the majority of them are active or retired military personnel,this does not mean the high command would be susceptible to the kind of structural sabotage seen in Venezuela. The Chinese already know every inch of Taiwan’s governmental structure and conduct military training on full-scale replicas, constructed as a mock district since last year. However, what would the situation look like under a pro-China government? Could similar self-sabotage actions occur, as seen in Venezuela? It seems to me that the Chinese will also consider this scenario. Even so, the Chinese still have much to learn and will come to realize that the level of negotiations between the U.S. and Latin American governments is quite different from the dynamics they maintain with Taiwan.

The Chinese have limited understanding of the West. In recent weeks, Chinese military circles have extensively discussed the U.S. operation in Venezuela, attributing its success primarily to the decapitation of the regime. All Chinese analyses center on the collapse of the defense chain and the subservience that resulted from the leadership vacuum. The Chinese seem almost incapable, at least initially, of considering the reverse scenario: that U.S. intelligence, by infiltrating circles close to Maduro over many months and negotiating compensations, managed to neutralize the entire chain, delivering Maduro in exchange for preserving the governing structure. The Chinese are analyzing the U.S. approach in the context of Taiwan, focusing on decapitation of the central leadership. But suppose the Chinese were willing to spend tens of millions of dollars. Even then, the level of corruption in Taiwan is not comparable to the situation among Venezuela’s military. Although more than 150 people have been indicted since 2020 for spying for China, and the majority of them are active or retired military personnel,this does not mean the high command would be susceptible to the kind of structural sabotage seen in Venezuela. The Chinese already know every inch of Taiwan’s governmental structure and conduct military training on full-scale replicas, constructed as a mock district since last year. However, what would the situation look like under a pro-China government? Could similar self-sabotage actions occur, as seen in Venezuela? It seems to me that the Chinese will also consider this scenario. Even so, the Chinese still have much to learn and will come to realize that the level of negotiations between the U.S. and Latin American governments is quite different from the dynamics they maintain with Taiwan.

Patricia Marins

22,305 views • 6 months ago