Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 CHINA'S 58-DAY COLLAPSE 🚨 Peter Schweizer breaks down Trump's strategic masterclass: → Venezuela's Maduro regime stunted → Iran's military installations destroyed → Chinese air defense systems obliterated (0 U.S. losses) → Beijing loses 20-25% of energy supply → Strait of Hormuz now controlled by Trump "China's the big...

39,310 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 Peter Schweizer 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐀'𝐒 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍 𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 China armed Iran with advanced missiles. Every warhead carries Chinese components. The guidance systems. The propellant chemistry. The technical expertise. Trump is destroying the entire operation. 👉𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐏𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐃: 🔸China provided air defense systems to Iran. US and Israeli strikes decimated them. 🔸China invested $100B+ in Iranian infrastructure. Those investments are gone. 🔸Iran and Venezuela supplied 20% of China's oil at discount prices. Trump eliminated both sources. 🔸China paid in yuan to avoid US dollars. Now Beijing must buy oil with American currency. 🔸40% of Chinese oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump controls that chokepoint. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐂 𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐅𝐓: Beijing wanted to move on Taiwan. Now any military action creates an energy crisis. The Strait of Hormuz becomes a kill switch. You remember 2020. China threatened to withhold PPE during COVID. You remember the rare earth threats. Trump reversed all of Beijing's leverage. 👉𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘: Hudson Institute data shows Chinese components accelerated Iranian production to 5,000 missiles by 2027. Projections show 10,000 by 2030. These are precision weapons that strike targets across the Middle East. Beijing built this arsenal while condemning regional conflicts publicly. Spring negotiations with President Xi approach. Trump holds every advantage. Watch the full discussion on Fox News with Laura Ingraham. 👇

Government Accountability Institute

215,074 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Operation Epic Fury’s geopolitical ramifications has China between a rock and a hard place, with Iran being their oil vendor it leaves them on the sidelines with little recourse, the $1 million question is when the CCP gets desperate for the massive amounts of energy reserves they require is, what moves/options they actually have ? Much of the EU depends on Russia for their energy but China and Russia are next-door neighbors, I think we are witnessing a massive realignment in energy trade that may very well leave the EU out in the cold. ⏺️ Energy Security Vulnerabilities Exposed: The clip underscores China's heavy reliance on Middle Eastern oil imports (over 10 million barrels daily), making it susceptible to U.S.-influenced disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz; this could lead to supply shortages, higher prices, and economic instability, prompting China to accelerate diversification efforts like the Belt and Road Initiative for alternative routes. ⏺️ Escalation of U.S.-China Rivalry: By framing U.S. actions against Iran as indirectly targeting China's industrial base, the narrative highlights a proxy dimension to great-power competition; this could intensify tensions, pushing China toward stronger alliances with Iran and Russia to counter U.S. naval dominance and secure energy corridors. ⏺️ Strategic Incentives for Military Buildup: The emphasis on U.S. "pressure without war" via naval control may accelerate China's naval modernization (e.g., expanding its blue-water fleet and anti-access/area denial capabilities) to challenge U.S. influence in key chokepoints, potentially leading to heightened militarization in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. ⏺️ Economic Leverage and Trade Impacts: Disruptions to Iranian oil (a key supplier) could raise global energy costs, affecting China's manufacturing exports and GDP growth; this might encourage Beijing to deepen domestic energy reforms, invest in renewables, or use economic tools like yuan-denominated oil trades to reduce dollar dependence and U.S. financial leverage. ⏺️ Diplomatic Realignments: The reel suggests U.S. strategies weaken rivals without direct conflict, which could drive China to bolster multilateral forums (e.g., SCO, BRICS) for collective resistance against U.S. unilateralism, while straining U.S.-China relations and complicating global issues like climate talks or non-proliferation efforts. ⏺️ Risk of Broader Instability: If U.S. pressures lead to Iranian instability or regional conflicts, China could face

MAGA X Times Daily News 🇺🇸

12,268 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

‼️🇹🇼🇺🇲🇨🇳 BIG | The U.S. National Security Strategy Establishes the Principle of “Defending Taiwan” — says Su Ziyun, Head of Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security. Based on his analysis of the document, Su notes that the United States is shifting from strategic ambiguity to strategic clarity regarding Taiwan’s defense. The priority of the Taiwan issue in Washington’s policy is increasing, while the main emphasis is moving toward collective defense mechanisms and preventing any attempt to change the status quo by force. For the first time, the U.S. strategy includes a direct formulation declaring the seizure of Taiwan by any specific state unacceptable — and the document no longer contains the traditional references to the “One China Policy” that appeared under previous administrations. Although China is not openly criticized in the strategy, the text implicitly reflects a containment approach: Beijing is described as the only actor possessing both the intent and the capabilities to alter the global order. For comparison: Trump’s first National Defense Strategy mentioned Taiwan three times, Biden’s document five times, while the new strategy refers to Taiwan eight times. Su Ziyun also emphasizes that the entire “Trump 2.0” team is strongly anti-communist. According to him, despite Trump’s sharp rhetoric, his decision-making circle fully recognizes Taiwan’s geopolitical value. The incorporation of the “Taiwan Assurance Act” into domestic U.S. law has practically eliminated the so-called “anti-Americanism theory.” Su further highlights public sentiment in Taiwan: according to surveys, up to 40% of Taiwanese citizens are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country, and around 70% are ready to go to war. These are among the highest levels seen in democratic states and, in Su’s view, demonstrate the reliability and mobilization capacity of Taiwanese society. The remaining challenge concerns the governing party’s communication skills. As Su Ziyun states: “Taiwan is not hostile to China — the Chinese Communist Party is hostile to democracy.” He urges the opposition to take the “correct historical position,” support the defense budget, and show the world that Taiwan’s democracy is maturing and ready to assume responsibility for its own security. Only in this way, he argues, can Taiwan establish a positive cycle of cooperation with its allies. Ultimately, the publication of the U.S. National Security Strategy shows that Taiwan has now been fully integrated into the American strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific region. The frequent mentions of Taiwan, references to “collective defense,” and the omission of the “One China” phrase all illustrate the deepening of Washington’s involvement. Taiwan’s leadership interprets the new strategy as confirmation of U.S. guarantees, which further strengthens its political reliance on Washington. The internal Taiwanese discourse is increasingly shaped by American assessments — from defining threats to military standards and defense-budget requirements. Taiwan is effectively adopting the American strategic logic of regional confrontation with China: it is strengthening its armed forces according to U.S. expectations, deepening cooperation with the Pentagon, and aligning political rhetoric with American interests, which in turn heightens tensions with Beijing. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

41,074 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The Chinese have limited understanding of the West. In recent weeks, Chinese military circles have extensively discussed the U.S. operation in Venezuela, attributing its success primarily to the decapitation of the regime. All Chinese analyses center on the collapse of the defense chain and the subservience that resulted from the leadership vacuum. The Chinese seem almost incapable, at least initially, of considering the reverse scenario: that U.S. intelligence, by infiltrating circles close to Maduro over many months and negotiating compensations, managed to neutralize the entire chain, delivering Maduro in exchange for preserving the governing structure. The Chinese are analyzing the U.S. approach in the context of Taiwan, focusing on decapitation of the central leadership. But suppose the Chinese were willing to spend tens of millions of dollars. Even then, the level of corruption in Taiwan is not comparable to the situation among Venezuela’s military. Although more than 150 people have been indicted since 2020 for spying for China, and the majority of them are active or retired military personnel,this does not mean the high command would be susceptible to the kind of structural sabotage seen in Venezuela. The Chinese already know every inch of Taiwan’s governmental structure and conduct military training on full-scale replicas, constructed as a mock district since last year. However, what would the situation look like under a pro-China government? Could similar self-sabotage actions occur, as seen in Venezuela? It seems to me that the Chinese will also consider this scenario. Even so, the Chinese still have much to learn and will come to realize that the level of negotiations between the U.S. and Latin American governments is quite different from the dynamics they maintain with Taiwan.

Patricia Marins

22,305 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨🇮🇷 🇺🇸 TRUMP DESTROYED THEIR NAVY, KILLED THEIR LEADERS, AND STILL CAN'T DECLARE VICTORY...HERE'S WHY Professor Glenn Diesen says Trump's biggest miscalculation was assuming overwhelming firepower would force Iran to fold. It didn't. Iran went up the escalation ladder step by step and denied the U.S. the ability to choose when this war ends. The Strait of Hormuz is the entire ballgame. Trump can claim he wiped out the air force, the navy, the nuclear program. But as long as Iran controls that chokepoint, he can't go home with a win. Glenn says Iran never wanted this fight. They sat out October 7th. They watched Hezbollah get crushed without intervening. But once the U.S. struck directly, survival became the only calculation. Now Iran is building a joint maritime protocol with Oman for postwar control of the strait. Trump just proposed a $1.5 trillion defense budget. And Rubio's victory checklist quietly dropped two things: regime change and reopening the strait. The question nobody in Washington wants to answer: what happens when you win every battle and still lose the war? Full interview with Glenn Diesen below 1:00 — Trump Wants an Off-Ramp. Iran Won't Give Him One. 3:29 — Iran's General Staff Responds Live on Air 4:58 — Why Escalation Control Is a Delusion 5:37 — Could Trump Just Walk Away and Let the World Sort Out Hormuz? 8:25 — Iran Is Building a Toll System for the Strait 11:38 — Trump's $1.5 Trillion Defense Budget Drops Mid-Interview 14:09 — Israel Has a Veto Over When This War Ends 17:20 — "I Never Predicted We'd End Up Here. It Doesn't Make Sense." 22:38 — Peace Through Strength or Just the Neocons With a New Name? 35:07 — Iran Could Kill the Petrodollar If Trump Walks Away

Mario Nawfal

472,187 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce