Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

China’s HarmonyOS is outside Western control—and that is precisely why the Anglo-American financial elites hate it. Western sanctions were designed to keep China locked into the US software oligopoly—Google Android, Microsoft Windows, and Apple—that HarmonyOS is designed to escape. US platforms enable surveillance, data extraction, and, when convenient, remote...

apocalypseos's profile picture

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

95,015 subscribers

13,267 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

WESTERN ELITES’ REAL WAR: BREAK CHINA, RUSSIA AND BRICS BY TARGETING IRAN Pepe Escobar: The deeper story is far bigger. Western ruling elites are not primarily fighting Tehran. They are fighting the rising power structure forming around China, Russia and BRICS. Iran sits at the center of that system, and that is exactly why it is under pressure. THE TRUE OBJECTIVE ➡️ The war on Iran is a war against Russia, China, BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the entire project of Eurasian integration. ➡️ US ruling elites see Eurasia as an organic system connecting east, west, north and south. ➡️ That system is the key vector of 21st-century geopolitics and an absolute anathema to them. ➡️ They are determined to break Eurasian integration by any means necessary. IRAN AS THE KEY NODE ➡️ Geography and history place Iran at the decisive crossroads of connectivity corridors. ➡️ The Caspian Express is being built from Astrakhan to Bandar Anzali, linking the International North-South Transportation Corridor. ➡️ The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor reaches Gwadar, then crosses freely into Iran with almost no barriers. ➡️ These routes allow China, Russia and Iran to trade outside American naval control and sanctions. THE DISRUPTION STRATEGY ➡️ Western elites know that if these corridors mature, the multipolar power centered on China, Russia and BRICS becomes much harder to contain. ➡️ They will try to break the system. ➡️ One method already visible is the use of proxy cells in Pakistani Baluchistan to create constant instability along the Iranian border. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran is the visible target. The real mission is to disrupt the rising power of China, Russia and BRICS before the new Eurasian architecture locks in. The elites are not improvising. They are following a long-standing strategic imperative: prevent the emergence of a coherent Eurasian system at all costs. That is the war behind the war. HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal Pepe Escobar #EurasiaWar #ChinaRussiaBRICS #WesternElites #IranKeyNode #CPEC #CaspianExpress #MultipolarOrder
1:30

WESTERN ELITES’ REAL WAR: BREAK CHINA, RUSSIA AND BRICS BY TARGETING IRAN Pepe Escobar: The deeper story is far bigger. Western ruling elites are not primarily fighting Tehran. They are fighting the rising power structure forming around China, Russia and BRICS. Iran sits at the center of that system, and that is exactly why it is under pressure. THE TRUE OBJECTIVE ➡️ The war on Iran is a war against Russia, China, BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the entire project of Eurasian integration. ➡️ US ruling elites see Eurasia as an organic system connecting east, west, north and south. ➡️ That system is the key vector of 21st-century geopolitics and an absolute anathema to them. ➡️ They are determined to break Eurasian integration by any means necessary. IRAN AS THE KEY NODE ➡️ Geography and history place Iran at the decisive crossroads of connectivity corridors. ➡️ The Caspian Express is being built from Astrakhan to Bandar Anzali, linking the International North-South Transportation Corridor. ➡️ The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor reaches Gwadar, then crosses freely into Iran with almost no barriers. ➡️ These routes allow China, Russia and Iran to trade outside American naval control and sanctions. THE DISRUPTION STRATEGY ➡️ Western elites know that if these corridors mature, the multipolar power centered on China, Russia and BRICS becomes much harder to contain. ➡️ They will try to break the system. ➡️ One method already visible is the use of proxy cells in Pakistani Baluchistan to create constant instability along the Iranian border. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran is the visible target. The real mission is to disrupt the rising power of China, Russia and BRICS before the new Eurasian architecture locks in. The elites are not improvising. They are following a long-standing strategic imperative: prevent the emergence of a coherent Eurasian system at all costs. That is the war behind the war. HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal Pepe Escobar #EurasiaWar #ChinaRussiaBRICS #WesternElites #IranKeyNode #CPEC #CaspianExpress #MultipolarOrder

Mark

27,580 Aufrufe • vor 18 Stunden

🚨 Western tech giants aren’t 'platforms' — they’re weapons of neocolonial control Don’t believe us, here is the evidence: Argentinian foreign policy expert Tadeo Casteglione to Sputnik: ▪️While the world was distracted, Iran just showed us how to fight back: during the chaos before the US-Israeli strikes, Tehran shut down foreign apps and flipped the switch to a sovereign national digital ecosystem. No more Silicon Valley backdoors. ▪️China built its own intranet years ago — total control over apps and data. Russia has been racing since 2022 to break free from Western hardware/software chokeholds. ▪️Even Turkiye is now hunting its own solutions. ▪️The Global South doesn’t need to wait for the next crisis. The nations need clear, ironclad rules that protect data, people, and sovereignty. 👉Go indigenous, join us on Arattai. Link in bio
2:24

🚨 Western tech giants aren’t 'platforms' — they’re weapons of neocolonial control Don’t believe us, here is the evidence: Argentinian foreign policy expert Tadeo Casteglione to Sputnik: ▪️While the world was distracted, Iran just showed us how to fight back: during the chaos before the US-Israeli strikes, Tehran shut down foreign apps and flipped the switch to a sovereign national digital ecosystem. No more Silicon Valley backdoors. ▪️China built its own intranet years ago — total control over apps and data. Russia has been racing since 2022 to break free from Western hardware/software chokeholds. ▪️Even Turkiye is now hunting its own solutions. ▪️The Global South doesn’t need to wait for the next crisis. The nations need clear, ironclad rules that protect data, people, and sovereignty. 👉Go indigenous, join us on Arattai. Link in bio

Sputnik India

105,045 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.
0:26

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Larry Fink of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, just laid bare the playbook of Wall Street and the City of London on BBC: either Iran is “accepted” back into the international community—meaning the petrodollar system—or the Strait of Hormuz remains a “threat,” triggering a global recession with oil at $150 a barrel. What Fink calls “two extreme outcomes” reflects a coherent strategic logic: use military aggression against Iran to destabilize the global economy, force energy dependence on US and Western hydrocarbons, and slow the emerging BRICS-led development paradigm. Note the sleight of hand: Fink frames Iran’s “acceptance” as a return to the old order—Iranian oil flooding the market, prices crashing to $40, and the petrodollar system “stabilized.” The alternative? War, $150 oil, global recession. But he’s missing the third option—the one unfolding in reality: Iran, Russia, and China are building new trade corridors, increasingly bypassing the Strait of Hormuz, the dollar, Wall Street, and the City of London entirely. The BRICS paradigm does not require Iran’s “acceptance” by Wall Street. It requires Iran’s full integration into a new security and development architecture—exactly what is happening. Fink admits the real stakes when he pivots to AI: “If we do not invest more, China wins.” There it is. The war against Iran, the war against Russia, the technology race with China—they are all fronts in the same struggle: the dying Anglo-American financial order’s last attempt to maintain global supremacy. Fink says there will be no middle outcome. He’s right. The choice is not $40 oil or $150 oil. The choice is between a dead empire clinging to genocide and dollar supremacy, or a new world order built on sovereignty, development, and peace. The empire is losing. Iran is winning. And the City of London knows it.
1:10

Larry Fink of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, just laid bare the playbook of Wall Street and the City of London on BBC: either Iran is “accepted” back into the international community—meaning the petrodollar system—or the Strait of Hormuz remains a “threat,” triggering a global recession with oil at $150 a barrel. What Fink calls “two extreme outcomes” reflects a coherent strategic logic: use military aggression against Iran to destabilize the global economy, force energy dependence on US and Western hydrocarbons, and slow the emerging BRICS-led development paradigm. Note the sleight of hand: Fink frames Iran’s “acceptance” as a return to the old order—Iranian oil flooding the market, prices crashing to $40, and the petrodollar system “stabilized.” The alternative? War, $150 oil, global recession. But he’s missing the third option—the one unfolding in reality: Iran, Russia, and China are building new trade corridors, increasingly bypassing the Strait of Hormuz, the dollar, Wall Street, and the City of London entirely. The BRICS paradigm does not require Iran’s “acceptance” by Wall Street. It requires Iran’s full integration into a new security and development architecture—exactly what is happening. Fink admits the real stakes when he pivots to AI: “If we do not invest more, China wins.” There it is. The war against Iran, the war against Russia, the technology race with China—they are all fronts in the same struggle: the dying Anglo-American financial order’s last attempt to maintain global supremacy. Fink says there will be no middle outcome. He’s right. The choice is not $40 oil or $150 oil. The choice is between a dead empire clinging to genocide and dollar supremacy, or a new world order built on sovereignty, development, and peace. The empire is losing. Iran is winning. And the City of London knows it.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

30,805 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Iran wants China as a guarantor before moving forward with a deal with the US. That tells you everything. After decades of broken promises, sanctions, coups, assassinations, and “rules-based” piracy, many countries no longer trust the West to keep its word. They need someone powerful enough to restrain Washington — and stable enough to be trusted with the consequences. Western media asks whether China will accept Iran’s uranium. The deeper question is why Iran would rather entrust it to China than to the same “international community” that has watched the US tear up agreements whenever convenient. China is cursed by Western headlines every day. Yet for countries standing under the bombs, sanctions, and diplomatic traps of empire, China increasingly looks like the last reliable shelter.
2:32

Iran wants China as a guarantor before moving forward with a deal with the US. That tells you everything. After decades of broken promises, sanctions, coups, assassinations, and “rules-based” piracy, many countries no longer trust the West to keep its word. They need someone powerful enough to restrain Washington — and stable enough to be trusted with the consequences. Western media asks whether China will accept Iran’s uranium. The deeper question is why Iran would rather entrust it to China than to the same “international community” that has watched the US tear up agreements whenever convenient. China is cursed by Western headlines every day. Yet for countries standing under the bombs, sanctions, and diplomatic traps of empire, China increasingly looks like the last reliable shelter.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

52,289 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Trump Just Sounded The Alarm On China Beating the U.S. In Crypto Race President Trump says, “We don’t want to see China take over crypto… Crypto is a BIG deal and takes off the pressure from the dollar.” China is already building gold-backed blockchain settlement system with BRICS. Japan and Russia have already passed their version of Clarity Act and Putin said that Western Financial Infrastructure is out of date(THE IRONY). Iran is already taking Hormuz transit fee in crypto and Chinese Yuan. These aren’t experiments. They’re strategic weapons designed to challenge the dollar’s global dominance, shift power away from American leadership, and lock in control of the next era of money and technology.
0:43

Trump Just Sounded The Alarm On China Beating the U.S. In Crypto Race President Trump says, “We don’t want to see China take over crypto… Crypto is a BIG deal and takes off the pressure from the dollar.” China is already building gold-backed blockchain settlement system with BRICS. Japan and Russia have already passed their version of Clarity Act and Putin said that Western Financial Infrastructure is out of date(THE IRONY). Iran is already taking Hormuz transit fee in crypto and Chinese Yuan. These aren’t experiments. They’re strategic weapons designed to challenge the dollar’s global dominance, shift power away from American leadership, and lock in control of the next era of money and technology.

Stern Drew

10,564 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Why the IMF Is Dangerous: Zambia as a Case Study Zambia’s story is one of the clearest examples of why the IMF is not a rescuer, and Africans need to stop treating it like one. When Zambia ran into crisis, the response was not to help the country build lasting strength. It was to cut food subsidies, reduce spending on education and healthcare, and strip the state of control over its own strategic assets. The copper mines, which should have remained central to Zambia’s economic future, were pushed back into foreign hands. That is not support. That is economic domination packaged as reform. This is why Africans have to look more critically at what so-called help from Western-led financial institutions has actually done across the continent. Time and again, the pattern is the same: countries enter crisis, external lenders step in with conditions, and those conditions weaken public systems, deepen hardship, and erode national control over resources. What is presented as financial assistance often leaves African nations poorer, more dependent, and less able to determine their own path. It's time we call it what it is: neo-colonialism operating through the deceptive language of economic rescue.
3:04

Why the IMF Is Dangerous: Zambia as a Case Study Zambia’s story is one of the clearest examples of why the IMF is not a rescuer, and Africans need to stop treating it like one. When Zambia ran into crisis, the response was not to help the country build lasting strength. It was to cut food subsidies, reduce spending on education and healthcare, and strip the state of control over its own strategic assets. The copper mines, which should have remained central to Zambia’s economic future, were pushed back into foreign hands. That is not support. That is economic domination packaged as reform. This is why Africans have to look more critically at what so-called help from Western-led financial institutions has actually done across the continent. Time and again, the pattern is the same: countries enter crisis, external lenders step in with conditions, and those conditions weaken public systems, deepen hardship, and erode national control over resources. What is presented as financial assistance often leaves African nations poorer, more dependent, and less able to determine their own path. It's time we call it what it is: neo-colonialism operating through the deceptive language of economic rescue.

The Spearhead

11,314 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Dangers Of A Western-Led AI Revolution For Africa The so-called 'AI Revolution' being marketed by western tech interests is not an inevitable, neutral or benevolent phenomenon but a deliberate power grab that seeks to cement the world's less powerful populations into a new form of economic dependency. US president Donald Trump's recent decision to halt advanced features of a new Anthropic AI model outside the US illustrates the inherent danger of surrendering technological sovereignty and becoming dependent on technology that comes inbuilt with a US government kill switch. Biggest Mack explores this for The Spearhead.
5:14

The Dangers Of A Western-Led AI Revolution For Africa The so-called 'AI Revolution' being marketed by western tech interests is not an inevitable, neutral or benevolent phenomenon but a deliberate power grab that seeks to cement the world's less powerful populations into a new form of economic dependency. US president Donald Trump's recent decision to halt advanced features of a new Anthropic AI model outside the US illustrates the inherent danger of surrendering technological sovereignty and becoming dependent on technology that comes inbuilt with a US government kill switch. Biggest Mack explores this for The Spearhead.

The Spearhead

21,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Strait of Hormuz and the Western Hypocrisy Africa Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Since the US‑Israeli war on Iran began, President Donald Trump’s actions have exposed how American foreign policy often changes based on self-interest. When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supply, Trump first lifted sanctions on Russian oil and then allowed Iran to sell its own oil — the very country the US is at war with. These moves show that rules the US imposes on others can be suspended when convenient. For Africa, this is a clear warning. Africa must build its own systems in finance, politics, and trade, and pursue partnerships that benefit the continent; with or without Washington’s approval.
4:05

The Strait of Hormuz and the Western Hypocrisy Africa Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Since the US‑Israeli war on Iran began, President Donald Trump’s actions have exposed how American foreign policy often changes based on self-interest. When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supply, Trump first lifted sanctions on Russian oil and then allowed Iran to sell its own oil — the very country the US is at war with. These moves show that rules the US imposes on others can be suspended when convenient. For Africa, this is a clear warning. Africa must build its own systems in finance, politics, and trade, and pursue partnerships that benefit the continent; with or without Washington’s approval.

The Spearhead

21,758 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

China: The Vanguard of the 21st Century Untouchable & Not Defeatable! In the 21st century, China has emerged as a formidable global leader, redefining the contours of military, industrial, and financial power. This ascent is not merely a shift in geopolitics but a testament to China’s strategic vision, disciplined execution, and unwavering commitment to its people and sovereignty. With a blend of historical resilience and modern innovation, China stands as a beacon of progress, steering the world toward a multipolar future. Militarily, China has transformed into a powerhouse, prioritizing self-reliance and advanced technology. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is now one of the most sophisticated forces globally, equipped with cutting-edge weaponry, including hypersonic missiles, stealth fighters like the J-20, and a rapidly expanding naval fleet featuring aircraft carriers like the Fujian. China’s military doctrine emphasizes defense and regional stability, deterring external threats while safeguarding its territorial integrity. Investments in cyber warfare, artificial intelligence, and space technology further underscore its forward-thinking approach. By maintaining a no-first-use nuclear policy and advocating for peaceful resolutions, China positions itself as a responsible global actor, contrasting with the interventionist tendencies of other powers. Industrially, China has become the world’s manufacturing hub, driving global supply chains with unmatched efficiency. From high-speed rail networks to renewable energy technologies, China leads in infrastructure and innovation. Its Belt and Road Initiative has fostered connectivity across Asia, Africa, and Europe, creating economic corridors that uplift developing nations. Companies like Huawei and BYD exemplify China’s technological prowess, dominating 5G infrastructure and electric vehicle markets. The nation’s focus on green energy—leading the world in solar and wind power production—demonstrates its commitment to sustainable development. By prioritizing innovation, China has transitioned from being the “world’s factory” to a leader in high-tech industries, setting global standards in AI, robotics, and quantum computing. Financially, China’s influence is equally profound. The renminbi is steadily gaining traction as a global currency, with institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) challenging Western-dominated financial systems. China’s digital economy, driven by platforms like Alipay and WeChat, has revolutionized global fintech, offering inclusive financial services to millions. The country’s foreign exchange reserves, among the largest in the world, provide economic stability and leverage in international trade. By promoting de-dollarization and fostering trade agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China is reshaping global finance, prioritizing mutual benefit over hegemony. Its prudent economic policies have lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty, creating a robust middle class that fuels domestic consumption and global demand. China’s rise is not without challenges, but its ability to navigate complexities—be it geopolitical tensions or economic transitions—reflects its strategic depth. The nation’s emphasis on cultural heritage, education, and social cohesion fosters a unified society capable of sustaining long-term goals. Unlike powers that rely on coercion, China’s influence stems from partnership and shared prosperity, offering a model of development that resonates with the Global South. In the 21st century, China’s leadership in military, industrial, and financial spheres is a triumph of vision and resilience. It stands as a global force that champions sovereignty, innovation, and cooperation, shaping a world where power is balanced, and progress is inclusive. As the century unfolds, China’s trajectory promises to inspire and redefine global dynamics for generations to come.
1:24

China: The Vanguard of the 21st Century Untouchable & Not Defeatable! In the 21st century, China has emerged as a formidable global leader, redefining the contours of military, industrial, and financial power. This ascent is not merely a shift in geopolitics but a testament to China’s strategic vision, disciplined execution, and unwavering commitment to its people and sovereignty. With a blend of historical resilience and modern innovation, China stands as a beacon of progress, steering the world toward a multipolar future. Militarily, China has transformed into a powerhouse, prioritizing self-reliance and advanced technology. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is now one of the most sophisticated forces globally, equipped with cutting-edge weaponry, including hypersonic missiles, stealth fighters like the J-20, and a rapidly expanding naval fleet featuring aircraft carriers like the Fujian. China’s military doctrine emphasizes defense and regional stability, deterring external threats while safeguarding its territorial integrity. Investments in cyber warfare, artificial intelligence, and space technology further underscore its forward-thinking approach. By maintaining a no-first-use nuclear policy and advocating for peaceful resolutions, China positions itself as a responsible global actor, contrasting with the interventionist tendencies of other powers. Industrially, China has become the world’s manufacturing hub, driving global supply chains with unmatched efficiency. From high-speed rail networks to renewable energy technologies, China leads in infrastructure and innovation. Its Belt and Road Initiative has fostered connectivity across Asia, Africa, and Europe, creating economic corridors that uplift developing nations. Companies like Huawei and BYD exemplify China’s technological prowess, dominating 5G infrastructure and electric vehicle markets. The nation’s focus on green energy—leading the world in solar and wind power production—demonstrates its commitment to sustainable development. By prioritizing innovation, China has transitioned from being the “world’s factory” to a leader in high-tech industries, setting global standards in AI, robotics, and quantum computing. Financially, China’s influence is equally profound. The renminbi is steadily gaining traction as a global currency, with institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) challenging Western-dominated financial systems. China’s digital economy, driven by platforms like Alipay and WeChat, has revolutionized global fintech, offering inclusive financial services to millions. The country’s foreign exchange reserves, among the largest in the world, provide economic stability and leverage in international trade. By promoting de-dollarization and fostering trade agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China is reshaping global finance, prioritizing mutual benefit over hegemony. Its prudent economic policies have lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty, creating a robust middle class that fuels domestic consumption and global demand. China’s rise is not without challenges, but its ability to navigate complexities—be it geopolitical tensions or economic transitions—reflects its strategic depth. The nation’s emphasis on cultural heritage, education, and social cohesion fosters a unified society capable of sustaining long-term goals. Unlike powers that rely on coercion, China’s influence stems from partnership and shared prosperity, offering a model of development that resonates with the Global South. In the 21st century, China’s leadership in military, industrial, and financial spheres is a triumph of vision and resilience. It stands as a global force that champions sovereignty, innovation, and cooperation, shaping a world where power is balanced, and progress is inclusive. As the century unfolds, China’s trajectory promises to inspire and redefine global dynamics for generations to come.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇮🇪

670,665 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.
1:04

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

Global Times

123,625 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Some say that the most surprising aspect of the October 7 massacre—the most horrific attack on Jews since the Holocaust—is not necessarily what happened on October 7, not to minimize it. It is what happened on October 8 and October 9, and on all the days since, on Western campuses, in Western schools, and in Western media outlets. The way the West has reacted, in particular young people, all across this country and in Europe, to the horrors of October 7, has been as disappointing to so many of us as it was surprising because it misses the point. The point is that the October 7 attacks were not just attacks on Jews or Israelis alone; they were part of a broader war for the heart and soul of Western civilization.
2:43

Some say that the most surprising aspect of the October 7 massacre—the most horrific attack on Jews since the Holocaust—is not necessarily what happened on October 7, not to minimize it. It is what happened on October 8 and October 9, and on all the days since, on Western campuses, in Western schools, and in Western media outlets. The way the West has reacted, in particular young people, all across this country and in Europe, to the horrors of October 7, has been as disappointing to so many of us as it was surprising because it misses the point. The point is that the October 7 attacks were not just attacks on Jews or Israelis alone; they were part of a broader war for the heart and soul of Western civilization.

Roy K. Altman

13,362 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In a speech commemorating former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Xi said: “In the late spring and early summer of 1989, a severe political disturbance took place in China.” The funniest myth is that “Tiananmen Square in 1989” is somehow “unspeakable” in China. It is spoken about. What Western anti-China discourse cannot tolerate is that China discusses its own history without adopting the political script the West wrote for it. If Beijing uses its own historical framing, that is called “censorship.” If Western institutions impose theirs, that is called “history.” There’s the trick. They do not demand that China remember 1989. They demand that China remember it in a way useful to them. China’s refusal to surrender narrative sovereignty is then repackaged as proof that the subject is “taboo.” The event is not the real taboo. China refusing to narrate itself through Western political needs is.
0:22

In a speech commemorating former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Xi said: “In the late spring and early summer of 1989, a severe political disturbance took place in China.” The funniest myth is that “Tiananmen Square in 1989” is somehow “unspeakable” in China. It is spoken about. What Western anti-China discourse cannot tolerate is that China discusses its own history without adopting the political script the West wrote for it. If Beijing uses its own historical framing, that is called “censorship.” If Western institutions impose theirs, that is called “history.” There’s the trick. They do not demand that China remember 1989. They demand that China remember it in a way useful to them. China’s refusal to surrender narrative sovereignty is then repackaged as proof that the subject is “taboo.” The event is not the real taboo. China refusing to narrate itself through Western political needs is.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

53,053 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Silver squeeze. London cracking. China rising. The LBMA -London’s bullion market is under real stress just as China’s Shanghai Gold Exchange steps up to challenge it. Silver inventories in London are plunging, banks are flying in physical bars, and confidence in the LBMA, the heart of the Western metals system, is being tested. At the same time, China is positioning itself as the new global custodian for gold and silver, offering yuan-based settlement , vaulting to central banks and allied nations and developing a parallel financial architecture outside the Western system. Coincidence or strategy? Full interview with Andy Schectman on The Real Story Miles Franklin Precious Metals
11:53

Silver squeeze. London cracking. China rising. The LBMA -London’s bullion market is under real stress just as China’s Shanghai Gold Exchange steps up to challenge it. Silver inventories in London are plunging, banks are flying in physical bars, and confidence in the LBMA, the heart of the Western metals system, is being tested. At the same time, China is positioning itself as the new global custodian for gold and silver, offering yuan-based settlement , vaulting to central banks and allied nations and developing a parallel financial architecture outside the Western system. Coincidence or strategy? Full interview with Andy Schectman on The Real Story Miles Franklin Precious Metals

Michelle Makori

30,596 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

While India🇮🇳 is busy betraying BRICS, the United States Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Landau, went to India and told the Indians that the US🇺🇸 will ensure they never amount to anything. Landau stated that Washington would not repeat the “mistakes” it made with China 20 years ago. Specifically, he argued that the US had previously allowed the Chinese to develop their markets and gain economic advantages, only to see them become a peer competitor. This is explosive when you consider that Western, and especially American economic philosophy is a zero-sum game, with losers and losers. That’s why Landau spoke of “beating us in a lot of commercial things”. Because the US intends to win, and this automatically puts India on the wrong side of that equation. To the United States, global trade is a scoreboard where one country’s surplus is another’s deficit. So, by framing India’s potential market rise as something to be restricted, Landau is signaling that the US does not view the “rising tide lifts all boats” philosophy as a viable strategy. Instead, they’re treating economic growth as a finite resource in which dog eats dog. By grouping India with China, Landau is making it clear that any nation reaching a certain level of manufacturing or technological prowess is a threat to US hegemony and that the Americans have learned their lesson with China. Never again, and India must just let go of any delusions of progress. In practice, this will mean demanding that India lower its protective tariffs while the US simultaneously tightens its own standards and increases it's subsidies to keep American industry on top. All the best to India.
1:05

While India🇮🇳 is busy betraying BRICS, the United States Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Landau, went to India and told the Indians that the US🇺🇸 will ensure they never amount to anything. Landau stated that Washington would not repeat the “mistakes” it made with China 20 years ago. Specifically, he argued that the US had previously allowed the Chinese to develop their markets and gain economic advantages, only to see them become a peer competitor. This is explosive when you consider that Western, and especially American economic philosophy is a zero-sum game, with losers and losers. That’s why Landau spoke of “beating us in a lot of commercial things”. Because the US intends to win, and this automatically puts India on the wrong side of that equation. To the United States, global trade is a scoreboard where one country’s surplus is another’s deficit. So, by framing India’s potential market rise as something to be restricted, Landau is signaling that the US does not view the “rising tide lifts all boats” philosophy as a viable strategy. Instead, they’re treating economic growth as a finite resource in which dog eats dog. By grouping India with China, Landau is making it clear that any nation reaching a certain level of manufacturing or technological prowess is a threat to US hegemony and that the Americans have learned their lesson with China. Never again, and India must just let go of any delusions of progress. In practice, this will mean demanding that India lower its protective tariffs while the US simultaneously tightens its own standards and increases it's subsidies to keep American industry on top. All the best to India.

Sizwe SikaMusi

50,039 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan
1:28

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

Global Strategy

91,558 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇨🇳🇺🇸 Jeffrey Sachs: Chinese Statecraft & a New World Order For most of the past 2,000 years, China was among the most advanced civilizations in the world—leading in science, technology, economics, and governance. As late as 1820, Asia still accounted for over 50% of global GDP, with China playing a central role. But by 1950, after enduring more than a century of devastation—including the Opium Wars, the Taiping Rebellion, Western colonial carve-ups, the First Sino-Japanese War, Japan’s brutal 8-year invasion, and civil war—China had been reduced to just 2% of global GDP, despite holding 20% of the world’s population. This period, known in China as the “Century of Humiliation,” left a deep scar on the national psyche. What we are witnessing today is not the emergence of a new superpower—it is the return of an ancient one. China’s reemergence is not a disruption of the world order, but the rebalancing of a deeply skewed system that has, for 200 years, been dominated by Western imperial and racial hierarchies. Western discomfort stems from the mistaken belief that their global dominance is “natural” or “deserved.” But history tells a different story. Much of the Western-led world order was built through colonization, resource extraction, and ideologies of superiority—packaged as universal values. As Professor Jeffrey Sachs rightly said, the fear of China is rooted not in objective facts, but in the West’s refusal to accept that the world is changing. The era of Western exceptionalism is ending. And with it, the illusion that one part of the world should forever dictate the fate of the rest.
22:04

🇨🇳🇺🇸 Jeffrey Sachs: Chinese Statecraft & a New World Order For most of the past 2,000 years, China was among the most advanced civilizations in the world—leading in science, technology, economics, and governance. As late as 1820, Asia still accounted for over 50% of global GDP, with China playing a central role. But by 1950, after enduring more than a century of devastation—including the Opium Wars, the Taiping Rebellion, Western colonial carve-ups, the First Sino-Japanese War, Japan’s brutal 8-year invasion, and civil war—China had been reduced to just 2% of global GDP, despite holding 20% of the world’s population. This period, known in China as the “Century of Humiliation,” left a deep scar on the national psyche. What we are witnessing today is not the emergence of a new superpower—it is the return of an ancient one. China’s reemergence is not a disruption of the world order, but the rebalancing of a deeply skewed system that has, for 200 years, been dominated by Western imperial and racial hierarchies. Western discomfort stems from the mistaken belief that their global dominance is “natural” or “deserved.” But history tells a different story. Much of the Western-led world order was built through colonization, resource extraction, and ideologies of superiority—packaged as universal values. As Professor Jeffrey Sachs rightly said, the fear of China is rooted not in objective facts, but in the West’s refusal to accept that the world is changing. The era of Western exceptionalism is ending. And with it, the illusion that one part of the world should forever dictate the fate of the rest.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

40,404 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Empire Never Forgave Zimbabwe for Taking Back Land Zimbabwe is preparing to return 67 foreign-owned commercial farms seized during its land reform program, with the government saying the properties were protected under bilateral investment agreements. Before land reform, about 4,500 white farmers controlled most of the country’s most fertile land, a direct legacy of colonial dispossession. When Zimbabwe attempted to reverse that injustice, it was punished with sanctions, isolation, restricted access to finance, and years of Western hostility. Now, in the name of rebuilding relations with Western governments and international lenders, Zimbabwe is being pushed back into the old colonial bargain: return the land, compensate former settlers, reassure investors, and call it progress. This is not reconciliation. It is a land grab under the guise of economic blackmail. For Africa, the warning is clear: sovereignty means very little if a country cannot control its land, protect its resources, and make economic decisions without being punished by the same powers that benefited from colonial theft.
7:36

The Empire Never Forgave Zimbabwe for Taking Back Land Zimbabwe is preparing to return 67 foreign-owned commercial farms seized during its land reform program, with the government saying the properties were protected under bilateral investment agreements. Before land reform, about 4,500 white farmers controlled most of the country’s most fertile land, a direct legacy of colonial dispossession. When Zimbabwe attempted to reverse that injustice, it was punished with sanctions, isolation, restricted access to finance, and years of Western hostility. Now, in the name of rebuilding relations with Western governments and international lenders, Zimbabwe is being pushed back into the old colonial bargain: return the land, compensate former settlers, reassure investors, and call it progress. This is not reconciliation. It is a land grab under the guise of economic blackmail. For Africa, the warning is clear: sovereignty means very little if a country cannot control its land, protect its resources, and make economic decisions without being punished by the same powers that benefited from colonial theft.

The Spearhead

25,714 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Westerners still ask the same question like it’s clever: “Does the rest of the world actually want to be like China? No democracy, repressive on speech and human rights?” They’re looking at the 21st century with 19th and 20th century glasses. The assumption is that 1.4 billion Chinese must be suffering under some evil CCP. Black-and-white thinking that doesn’t fit reality anymore. China’s going to build its own system. It might not match the Western model — and that’s fine by them. When China was weak and divided, nobody was exporting human rights or democracy to them. The British forced opium on China in exchange for tea. Western powers seized territory, set up settlements, and burned the Summer Palace. It remains now unrestored as a permanent reminder of history for Chinese to never be blinded by hubris again. Now the same voices show up acting as saviors: “Don’t you want a better government? What’s wrong with you?” The condescension is unreal says Kishore. China will choose its own path. It may not be perfect in Western eyes, but it’s theirs. Unlike America, they don’t pretend their civilization is a universal model the whole world must copy. They do what works for China. You do what works for you. They’re not exporting their system to anyone. No threat. No need to feel insecure about China succeeding on its own terms. The West needs to drop the savior complex and get used to it. The 21st century isn’t yours to dictate anymore. Paraphrasing Kishore Mahbubani answering questions about China in 2020.
2:59

Westerners still ask the same question like it’s clever: “Does the rest of the world actually want to be like China? No democracy, repressive on speech and human rights?” They’re looking at the 21st century with 19th and 20th century glasses. The assumption is that 1.4 billion Chinese must be suffering under some evil CCP. Black-and-white thinking that doesn’t fit reality anymore. China’s going to build its own system. It might not match the Western model — and that’s fine by them. When China was weak and divided, nobody was exporting human rights or democracy to them. The British forced opium on China in exchange for tea. Western powers seized territory, set up settlements, and burned the Summer Palace. It remains now unrestored as a permanent reminder of history for Chinese to never be blinded by hubris again. Now the same voices show up acting as saviors: “Don’t you want a better government? What’s wrong with you?” The condescension is unreal says Kishore. China will choose its own path. It may not be perfect in Western eyes, but it’s theirs. Unlike America, they don’t pretend their civilization is a universal model the whole world must copy. They do what works for China. You do what works for you. They’re not exporting their system to anyone. No threat. No need to feel insecure about China succeeding on its own terms. The West needs to drop the savior complex and get used to it. The 21st century isn’t yours to dictate anymore. Paraphrasing Kishore Mahbubani answering questions about China in 2020.

Larry 長祥

65,923 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat