Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

“China’s national intelligence law, its counterespionage law, require Chinese companies to cooperate with Chinese intelligence and not disclose that fact to others. That creates espionage risks,” says Rush Doshi, director of CFR’s China Strategy Initiative and assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. “These robots are... show more

Council on Foreign Relations

572,585 subscribers

22,838 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“In 2024, Chinese factories installed roughly 300,000 new industrial robots. American factories installed 30,000. Today, there are now more than 2 million industrial robots working in Chinese factories. In the U.S., the number is one-fifth that,” says Rush Doshi, director of CFR’s China Strategy Initiative and assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. “China is investing in the future, it’s pulling ahead in research publications and patent filings, and pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into the robotics sector.”

“In 2024, Chinese factories installed roughly 300,000 new industrial robots. American factories installed 30,000. Today, there are now more than 2 million industrial robots working in Chinese factories. In the U.S., the number is one-fifth that,” says Rush Doshi, director of CFR’s China Strategy Initiative and assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. “China is investing in the future, it’s pulling ahead in research publications and patent filings, and pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into the robotics sector.”

Council on Foreign Relations

22,853 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“The Chinese Communist Party aims to catch up and surpass the West. It believes there have been four industrial revolutions that determine the fate of nations,” says Rush Doshi, director of CFR’s China Strategy Initiative and assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. “And now we’re in the fourth: quantum, biotech, and, of course, robotics and AI, which China is determined to win not just for the sake of prosperity, but for the sake of relative power.”

“The Chinese Communist Party aims to catch up and surpass the West. It believes there have been four industrial revolutions that determine the fate of nations,” says Rush Doshi, director of CFR’s China Strategy Initiative and assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. “And now we’re in the fourth: quantum, biotech, and, of course, robotics and AI, which China is determined to win not just for the sake of prosperity, but for the sake of relative power.”

Council on Foreign Relations

17,154 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kaizen Asiedu warns about the potential for Chinese students in America to be weaponized: “Some of these students, they could literally be turned into Chinese spies at any moment. In 2017, China passed a law, a national intelligence law, that compels any one of their citizens to assist the government in espionage if they require it.” Kaizen D. Asiedu

Kaizen Asiedu warns about the potential for Chinese students in America to be weaponized: “Some of these students, they could literally be turned into Chinese spies at any moment. In 2017, China passed a law, a national intelligence law, that compels any one of their citizens to assist the government in espionage if they require it.” Kaizen D. Asiedu

DeVory Darkins

28,042 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

China's National Intelligence Law (2017) gives the CCP the power to compel their companies to participate intelligence collection and espionage activities - both domestically and abroad... ... and Carney now plans to import 49,000 Chinese EVs, with "most-favoured-nation" status, in support of the New World Order.

China's National Intelligence Law (2017) gives the CCP the power to compel their companies to participate intelligence collection and espionage activities - both domestically and abroad... ... and Carney now plans to import 49,000 Chinese EVs, with "most-favoured-nation" status, in support of the New World Order.

Jeff Evely

22,187 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“The Chinese are pretty impressed by U.S. military capability, not just in Iran, but also in Venezuela . . . . However, at the same time, even though tactically we’ve been quite impressive, they see us strategically as making a massive mistake,” argues Rush Doshi, Asia studies expert and CFR’s director of the China Strategy Initiative, in reference to the talks between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Watch or listen to the latest episode of The President’s Inbox:

“The Chinese are pretty impressed by U.S. military capability, not just in Iran, but also in Venezuela . . . . However, at the same time, even though tactically we’ve been quite impressive, they see us strategically as making a massive mistake,” argues Rush Doshi, Asia studies expert and CFR’s director of the China Strategy Initiative, in reference to the talks between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Watch or listen to the latest episode of The President’s Inbox:

Council on Foreign Relations

21,148 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SENATE INTEL CHAIR: CHINESE TECH IS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT - U.S. SPY AGENCIES NEED AN UPGRADE Sen. Mark Warner - the Democrat who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee - is sounding the alarm again, calling China’s tech ecosystem a systemic national security threat and warning that U.S. intelligence laws “were written for a rotary-phone world.” Warner argues that Chinese firms like Huawei, TikTok, and others operating under China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law are not normal companies: They’re legally obligated to assist Beijing’s security services. That means data harvesting, influence operations, infrastructure access points - the entire stack. Warner says the U.S. still hasn’t updated its surveillance and counterintelligence tools to match this new battlefield, calling current protections “dangerously outdated” as China races ahead in AI, telecom, and cyber espionage. He’s not alone. A rare joint briefing by U.S. and allied spy chiefs - including the FBI, MI5, and their Five Eyes partners - recently warned that: China is conducting the largest technology-theft campaign in history, and more than half of its targets are in Silicon Valley. Beijing aims to dominate the next generation of computing, biotech, and AI - by any means necessary. This isn’t Cold War espionage anymore. It’s an always-on, digital infiltration campaign woven through apps, networks, and supply chains. Warner’s core message: The U.S. built the internet. China is trying to weaponize it. If Washington doesn’t modernize its intelligence playbook now, it may lose the next decade - and the technologies that define it. Source: CNBC, The New York Times

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SENATE INTEL CHAIR: CHINESE TECH IS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT - U.S. SPY AGENCIES NEED AN UPGRADE Sen. Mark Warner - the Democrat who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee - is sounding the alarm again, calling China’s tech ecosystem a systemic national security threat and warning that U.S. intelligence laws “were written for a rotary-phone world.” Warner argues that Chinese firms like Huawei, TikTok, and others operating under China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law are not normal companies: They’re legally obligated to assist Beijing’s security services. That means data harvesting, influence operations, infrastructure access points - the entire stack. Warner says the U.S. still hasn’t updated its surveillance and counterintelligence tools to match this new battlefield, calling current protections “dangerously outdated” as China races ahead in AI, telecom, and cyber espionage. He’s not alone. A rare joint briefing by U.S. and allied spy chiefs - including the FBI, MI5, and their Five Eyes partners - recently warned that: China is conducting the largest technology-theft campaign in history, and more than half of its targets are in Silicon Valley. Beijing aims to dominate the next generation of computing, biotech, and AI - by any means necessary. This isn’t Cold War espionage anymore. It’s an always-on, digital infiltration campaign woven through apps, networks, and supply chains. Warner’s core message: The U.S. built the internet. China is trying to weaponize it. If Washington doesn’t modernize its intelligence playbook now, it may lose the next decade - and the technologies that define it. Source: CNBC, The New York Times

Mario Nawfal

17,053 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

China urges US, EU to stop lies and meddling in China's internal affairs by hyping up ethnic issues The West always looks at China’s ethnic policy through the mirror of its own crimes. They committed genocide against indigenous peoples. They built settler states on mass graves. They erased languages, cultures, tribes, and entire civilizations. So they assume China must be doing the same. But China is not the West. China is a multi-ethnic civilization-state where ethnic minorities are not colonial subjects, not museum props, and not disposable populations. They are Chinese citizens, part of the same national community. That is why most Chinese ethnic minorities abroad introduce themselves simply as Chinese — not because their identity was erased, but because the national identity is real. And the panic over “extraterritorial application” is comedy. Chinese citizens abroad are still Chinese citizens. They receive Chinese consular protection. They carry Chinese passports. They are naturally subject to Chinese law where applicable. That is not “long-arm jurisdiction.” Long-arm jurisdiction is Washington hunting foreign citizens across the world, sanctioning companies in third countries, freezing assets, kidnapping executives, and pretending U.S. domestic law is international law. The U.S. and EU are not worried about human rights. They are worried that China refuses to let them weaponize ethnicity, separatism, and identity politics as tools of internal sabotage. They are not defending minorities. They are trying to manufacture another pressure point. China has seen this script before. Different costume. Same empire.

China urges US, EU to stop lies and meddling in China's internal affairs by hyping up ethnic issues The West always looks at China’s ethnic policy through the mirror of its own crimes. They committed genocide against indigenous peoples. They built settler states on mass graves. They erased languages, cultures, tribes, and entire civilizations. So they assume China must be doing the same. But China is not the West. China is a multi-ethnic civilization-state where ethnic minorities are not colonial subjects, not museum props, and not disposable populations. They are Chinese citizens, part of the same national community. That is why most Chinese ethnic minorities abroad introduce themselves simply as Chinese — not because their identity was erased, but because the national identity is real. And the panic over “extraterritorial application” is comedy. Chinese citizens abroad are still Chinese citizens. They receive Chinese consular protection. They carry Chinese passports. They are naturally subject to Chinese law where applicable. That is not “long-arm jurisdiction.” Long-arm jurisdiction is Washington hunting foreign citizens across the world, sanctioning companies in third countries, freezing assets, kidnapping executives, and pretending U.S. domestic law is international law. The U.S. and EU are not worried about human rights. They are worried that China refuses to let them weaponize ethnicity, separatism, and identity politics as tools of internal sabotage. They are not defending minorities. They are trying to manufacture another pressure point. China has seen this script before. Different costume. Same empire.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,431 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I seriously can’t wrap my head around Howard Lutnick’s response… Yesterday, President Trump stated he is allowing 600,000 Chinese students into the United States. Howard Lutnick justifies this by saying these 600,000 Chinese students are needed to keep U.S. Universities afloat with their tuition, because apparently American students can’t get a better education without bankrupting the bottom-tier colleges. So in a nutshell…. Chinese Students will go to the Top Tier Schools, while American students are stuck with SUBPAR options unless Chinese cash keeps the academic machine running. I’m at a loss for words.. and the fact that it’s China blows my mind. China’s 2015 National Security Law and 2017 National Intelligence Law effectively transformed ALL Chinese nationals, including STUDENTS, into spies obligated to serve the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by law. What the hell are we doing Howard Lutnick ?

I seriously can’t wrap my head around Howard Lutnick’s response… Yesterday, President Trump stated he is allowing 600,000 Chinese students into the United States. Howard Lutnick justifies this by saying these 600,000 Chinese students are needed to keep U.S. Universities afloat with their tuition, because apparently American students can’t get a better education without bankrupting the bottom-tier colleges. So in a nutshell…. Chinese Students will go to the Top Tier Schools, while American students are stuck with SUBPAR options unless Chinese cash keeps the academic machine running. I’m at a loss for words.. and the fact that it’s China blows my mind. China’s 2015 National Security Law and 2017 National Intelligence Law effectively transformed ALL Chinese nationals, including STUDENTS, into spies obligated to serve the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by law. What the hell are we doing Howard Lutnick ?

MJTruthUltra

91,673 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I'm concerned that the merger between Vodafone Group and Three UK is dangerous and risks giving a company with its roots in Communist Party-ruled China a more prominent place in the UK’s mobile network. Not only does the proposed deal raise serious questions about national security and competition, but it poses risks to our communication networks and personal data; given the Cheung Kong Group and the Li family being so knowingly involved with Chinese Government committees, their contacts in the Chinese Government and having to pass data over under the national security law. I'd like to hear that the UK Government are able to assure everybody publicly that this will not take place unless the security issues are clarified and are not still security issues at the end of this process.

I'm concerned that the merger between Vodafone Group and Three UK is dangerous and risks giving a company with its roots in Communist Party-ruled China a more prominent place in the UK’s mobile network. Not only does the proposed deal raise serious questions about national security and competition, but it poses risks to our communication networks and personal data; given the Cheung Kong Group and the Li family being so knowingly involved with Chinese Government committees, their contacts in the Chinese Government and having to pass data over under the national security law. I'd like to hear that the UK Government are able to assure everybody publicly that this will not take place unless the security issues are clarified and are not still security issues at the end of this process.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

20,759 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

On Tuesday, I testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on China's strides in robotics and AI. I warned that we lost solar, batteries, and EVs -- now we're at risk of losing robotics and AI. If that happens, it would irreversibly change the balance of power. Five points: 1️⃣ China aims to win the next industrial revolution. PRC leaders believe history is shaped by industrial revolutions. The first, steam power, made Britain dominant. The second and third, electrification and mass manufacturing, made America dominant. China is determined to win the fourth. 2️⃣ In robotics, China is already winning. In 2024, China installed 300,000 new industrial robots. America installed 30,000. China now has over 2 million robots in its factories — five times more than the US. A decade ago, it imported 75% of its robots. Today it makes 60% domestically. This year alone, China may spend $400 billion on industrial policy. The entire US CHIPS Act provided $50 billion across multiple years. If we fall behind here, U.S. reindustrialization becomes farfetched. 3️⃣ In AI, we're ahead — but selling off the advantage. China has more energy, more talent, and makes the edge devices. But America still leads because of chips, according to China's own AI companies. US chips are 4-5x better than China's today. We are debating whether to surrender that edge. 4️⃣ We are inviting risks of cyberespionage and catastrophic cyberattacks. PRC law requires its companies to cooperate with intelligence services and never disclose it. Today's robots carry LiDAR, microphones, and cameras — they are mobile surveillance platforms. But the bigger risk is cyberattack. We know China has compromised our power, gas, water, telecommunications, and transportation infrastructure in preparation for cyberattack. We cannot deploy robots in sensitive facilities from the very country targeting those facilities. 5️⃣ Here's what we must do. Extend ICTS rules to cover Chinese robots. Direct CISA to audit where they're deployed in critical infrastructure. Ban federal procurement of Chinese robotics and AI. Strengthen semiconductor export controls. Stop treating American AI companies with more regulatory scrutiny than Chinese ones. And build allied scale in robotics—a trading bloc with preferential terms for the members that can rival China's scale in in the sector. Thanks to @HomelandDemsIt and House Homeland GOP for the hearing on this topic, and grateful to join Michael Robbins and colleagues from Scale and Boston Dynamics for a great discussion.

On Tuesday, I testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on China's strides in robotics and AI. I warned that we lost solar, batteries, and EVs -- now we're at risk of losing robotics and AI. If that happens, it would irreversibly change the balance of power. Five points: 1️⃣ China aims to win the next industrial revolution. PRC leaders believe history is shaped by industrial revolutions. The first, steam power, made Britain dominant. The second and third, electrification and mass manufacturing, made America dominant. China is determined to win the fourth. 2️⃣ In robotics, China is already winning. In 2024, China installed 300,000 new industrial robots. America installed 30,000. China now has over 2 million robots in its factories — five times more than the US. A decade ago, it imported 75% of its robots. Today it makes 60% domestically. This year alone, China may spend $400 billion on industrial policy. The entire US CHIPS Act provided $50 billion across multiple years. If we fall behind here, U.S. reindustrialization becomes farfetched. 3️⃣ In AI, we're ahead — but selling off the advantage. China has more energy, more talent, and makes the edge devices. But America still leads because of chips, according to China's own AI companies. US chips are 4-5x better than China's today. We are debating whether to surrender that edge. 4️⃣ We are inviting risks of cyberespionage and catastrophic cyberattacks. PRC law requires its companies to cooperate with intelligence services and never disclose it. Today's robots carry LiDAR, microphones, and cameras — they are mobile surveillance platforms. But the bigger risk is cyberattack. We know China has compromised our power, gas, water, telecommunications, and transportation infrastructure in preparation for cyberattack. We cannot deploy robots in sensitive facilities from the very country targeting those facilities. 5️⃣ Here's what we must do. Extend ICTS rules to cover Chinese robots. Direct CISA to audit where they're deployed in critical infrastructure. Ban federal procurement of Chinese robotics and AI. Strengthen semiconductor export controls. Stop treating American AI companies with more regulatory scrutiny than Chinese ones. And build allied scale in robotics—a trading bloc with preferential terms for the members that can rival China's scale in in the sector. Thanks to @HomelandDemsIt and House Homeland GOP for the hearing on this topic, and grateful to join Michael Robbins and colleagues from Scale and Boston Dynamics for a great discussion.

Rush Doshi

152,123 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

China-Born Texas Democrat Rep Gene Wu We can TAKE OVER this country if every non-white person in America realizes that we all share the same Oppressor, White People 🔻 My Thought’s: People need to understand.. he was born in China and brought to America as a child to push communism. China’s plan is to send their citizens to take advantage of our immigration system, flood every aspect of society, especially elected office. China’s 2015 National Security Law and 2017 National Intelligence Law effectively transformed ALL Chinese nationals, including students, into spies obligated to serve the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by law.

China-Born Texas Democrat Rep Gene Wu We can TAKE OVER this country if every non-white person in America realizes that we all share the same Oppressor, White People 🔻 My Thought’s: People need to understand.. he was born in China and brought to America as a child to push communism. China’s plan is to send their citizens to take advantage of our immigration system, flood every aspect of society, especially elected office. China’s 2015 National Security Law and 2017 National Intelligence Law effectively transformed ALL Chinese nationals, including students, into spies obligated to serve the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by law.

MJTruthUltra

19,968 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“Your country is different from mine!” Panama's foreign minister shouted at China at OAS summit. This is the funniest part of Panama's whining: it violated commercial trust, tore up a 30-year port concession, targeted a Chinese-linked company, then hid the whole dirty performance under “sovereignty,” “constitution,” and “rule of law.” As if only Panama has sovereignty. As if only Panama has constitutional duties. As if China inspecting Panama-flagged vessels involved in repeated incidents in Chinese waters is not also an exercise of sovereignty, law enforcement, and responsibility for maritime safety. Yes, Panama is different from China. China does not turn its sovereignty and constitution into tools for Washington to destroy its own credibility and commercial environment. China’s law protects fair business, lawful cooperation, maritime safety, and good-faith investors. It is not a stage prop for small countries that target Chinese interests under U.S. pressure, then scream “bullying” when China stops playing along. Panama wanted to weaponize law against Chinese investors. China answered with law. That is why Panama is angry. Not because China broke the rules. Because China made Panama live under them.

“Your country is different from mine!” Panama's foreign minister shouted at China at OAS summit. This is the funniest part of Panama's whining: it violated commercial trust, tore up a 30-year port concession, targeted a Chinese-linked company, then hid the whole dirty performance under “sovereignty,” “constitution,” and “rule of law.” As if only Panama has sovereignty. As if only Panama has constitutional duties. As if China inspecting Panama-flagged vessels involved in repeated incidents in Chinese waters is not also an exercise of sovereignty, law enforcement, and responsibility for maritime safety. Yes, Panama is different from China. China does not turn its sovereignty and constitution into tools for Washington to destroy its own credibility and commercial environment. China’s law protects fair business, lawful cooperation, maritime safety, and good-faith investors. It is not a stage prop for small countries that target Chinese interests under U.S. pressure, then scream “bullying” when China stops playing along. Panama wanted to weaponize law against Chinese investors. China answered with law. That is why Panama is angry. Not because China broke the rules. Because China made Panama live under them.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

84,677 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

China opposes US sanctions against Russia's two largest oil companies, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said. "China always opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law and are unauthorized by the UN Security Council. Dialogue and negotiation is the only viable way out of the Ukraine crisis. Coercion and putting pressure on others do not solve the problem," he said during the briefing. Foreign ministry spokesperson also added that China "firmly deplores" the UN sanctions against 12 Chinese companies, accused of helping Russia circumvent Western sanctions.

China opposes US sanctions against Russia's two largest oil companies, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said. "China always opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law and are unauthorized by the UN Security Council. Dialogue and negotiation is the only viable way out of the Ukraine crisis. Coercion and putting pressure on others do not solve the problem," he said during the briefing. Foreign ministry spokesperson also added that China "firmly deplores" the UN sanctions against 12 Chinese companies, accused of helping Russia circumvent Western sanctions.

Anton Gerashchenko

195,011 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

There's billions of market cap right now listed on NASDAQ and NYSE of Chinese companies that I have to compete with. I have to pay for the compliance costs, I have to be transparent, I have to abide by the law, and they don't. They raise money with the same bankers I use and I have to compete with them and they're not being transparent. They have to get delisted. As soon as Atkins gets sworn in, start delisting these Chinese companies. This law was modified to only give them two years to abide and actually comply and they didn't. So delist them. Why should I have to compete with them? Let's squeeze them.

There's billions of market cap right now listed on NASDAQ and NYSE of Chinese companies that I have to compete with. I have to pay for the compliance costs, I have to be transparent, I have to abide by the law, and they don't. They raise money with the same bankers I use and I have to compete with them and they're not being transparent. They have to get delisted. As soon as Atkins gets sworn in, start delisting these Chinese companies. This law was modified to only give them two years to abide and actually comply and they didn't. So delist them. Why should I have to compete with them? Let's squeeze them.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

679,235 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Reveals the Hidden Risk of Chinese Hardware: “There were multiple times we discovered actual wiretap electronics in product samples that were given to us.” “The risks apply to everything that’s made with Chinese components… computers, servers, phones, drones.” “The Supermicro incident in the United States… certain server farms that had Chinese components smaller than a grain of rice… were stealing very sensitive information from the computer.” “How many [Chinese] computers exist in critical utilities and infrastructure and military? Millions, at least.” “How many of them are compromised by Chinese intelligence operations placing listening devices or false components in them?” “Surely they’re targeting every government, every military, and every company.” “I think it’s critical that countries, for their critical technologies… make sure they’re not built in China with Chinese components.”

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Reveals the Hidden Risk of Chinese Hardware: “There were multiple times we discovered actual wiretap electronics in product samples that were given to us.” “The risks apply to everything that’s made with Chinese components… computers, servers, phones, drones.” “The Supermicro incident in the United States… certain server farms that had Chinese components smaller than a grain of rice… were stealing very sensitive information from the computer.” “How many [Chinese] computers exist in critical utilities and infrastructure and military? Millions, at least.” “How many of them are compromised by Chinese intelligence operations placing listening devices or false components in them?” “Surely they’re targeting every government, every military, and every company.” “I think it’s critical that countries, for their critical technologies… make sure they’re not built in China with Chinese components.”

Anduril Appreciator

784,597 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

JUST IN AND UNUSUAL China pushes back against U.S. sanctions and moves to shield its oil companies with an official order. In a firm step underscoring its defense of national interests, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced a judicial order prohibiting the enforcement or compliance with U.S. sanctions imposed on five Chinese petrochemical companies accused by Washington of purchasing Iranian oil. According to the state‑run Xinhua News Agency, Beijing reiterated that it does not recognize unilateral U.S. measures, stressing that foreign sanctions carry no legal validity inside China. The decision reflects China’s insistence on economic sovereignty, its rejection of sanctions as a political pressure tool, and its commitment to protecting its companies and energy supply chains from external interference.

JUST IN AND UNUSUAL China pushes back against U.S. sanctions and moves to shield its oil companies with an official order. In a firm step underscoring its defense of national interests, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced a judicial order prohibiting the enforcement or compliance with U.S. sanctions imposed on five Chinese petrochemical companies accused by Washington of purchasing Iranian oil. According to the state‑run Xinhua News Agency, Beijing reiterated that it does not recognize unilateral U.S. measures, stressing that foreign sanctions carry no legal validity inside China. The decision reflects China’s insistence on economic sovereignty, its rejection of sanctions as a political pressure tool, and its commitment to protecting its companies and energy supply chains from external interference.

China pulse 🇨🇳

122,525 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten