Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

China’s playbook includes using academics & unofficial voices to float baseless territorial claims, then testing reactions. The Philippines has every right to reject this. Sovereignty is decided by international law & official channels, not propaganda or revisionist narratives.

wanghui90's profile picture

Wang Hui

1,852 subscribers

17,456 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

MAGYAR: Ukraine is the victim, and it has every right to protect its territorial sovereignty and integrity by all means at its disposal. I would also like to emphasize this, because independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine were guaranteed by Budapest Memorandum in 1994.
1:08

MAGYAR: Ukraine is the victim, and it has every right to protect its territorial sovereignty and integrity by all means at its disposal. I would also like to emphasize this, because independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine were guaranteed by Budapest Memorandum in 1994.

Kate from Kharkiv

133,865 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Graham Platner: “We need to respect international law consistently. I am a firm supporter of Ukraine’s right to resist a Russian invasion. But it is very hard for us to make the case the reason we support the Ukrainian fight is because they had their sovereignty impeded upon, that international law was broken when we support people that break international law every single day. It is impossible for us to say the Ukrainians have every right to do this and then turn around and invade Iraq. Or go drop bombs in Iran. Or murder fishermen in the Caribbean”
1:05

Graham Platner: “We need to respect international law consistently. I am a firm supporter of Ukraine’s right to resist a Russian invasion. But it is very hard for us to make the case the reason we support the Ukrainian fight is because they had their sovereignty impeded upon, that international law was broken when we support people that break international law every single day. It is impossible for us to say the Ukrainians have every right to do this and then turn around and invade Iraq. Or go drop bombs in Iran. Or murder fishermen in the Caribbean”

Marco Foster

24,816 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

On July 12, 2016, the Philippines secured a landmark legal victory. The Arbitral Award affirmed that China's sweeping claims in the West Philippine Sea have no legal basis under international law and clarified the Philippines' maritime rights. Yet China continues to reject the ruling while its actions at sea persist. The law has not changed, only the attempts to distort it. Don't let propaganda replace facts. Expose false narratives. Share verified information. Stand with the rule of law and help ensure that the truth about the West Philippine Sea is heard. The battle for our seas is also a battle for the truth. #BRPSierraMadre #WestPhilippineSea #ArbitralAward #RuleOfLaw #UNCLOS #StandForTruth #CounterDisinformation #KnowTheFacts #Philippines
1:54

On July 12, 2016, the Philippines secured a landmark legal victory. The Arbitral Award affirmed that China's sweeping claims in the West Philippine Sea have no legal basis under international law and clarified the Philippines' maritime rights. Yet China continues to reject the ruling while its actions at sea persist. The law has not changed, only the attempts to distort it. Don't let propaganda replace facts. Expose false narratives. Share verified information. Stand with the rule of law and help ensure that the truth about the West Philippine Sea is heard. The battle for our seas is also a battle for the truth. #BRPSierraMadre #WestPhilippineSea #ArbitralAward #RuleOfLaw #UNCLOS #StandForTruth #CounterDisinformation #KnowTheFacts #Philippines

BRP Sierra Madre

12,406 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Lu Shaye, China's ambassador to France, repeated Russian propaganda narratives on LCI channel. He called Crimea "originally Russian" and declared that ex-USSR countries "don't have an effective status in international law". Waiting for Beijing's official reaction. Is it a political statement by China or the ambassador's opinion? Such claims are very serious and threaten the global international order.
1:06

Lu Shaye, China's ambassador to France, repeated Russian propaganda narratives on LCI channel. He called Crimea "originally Russian" and declared that ex-USSR countries "don't have an effective status in international law". Waiting for Beijing's official reaction. Is it a political statement by China or the ambassador's opinion? Such claims are very serious and threaten the global international order.

Anton Gerashchenko

608,936 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.
1:39

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,004 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

'This is not lawless—it’s lawful self-defence.' Natasha Hausdorff on claims that Israel’s strikes on Iran violated international law. She says Iran has waged decades of proxy warfare—& Israel is fully within its rights to respond. 'Iran suddenly cares about international law?'
2:17

'This is not lawless—it’s lawful self-defence.' Natasha Hausdorff on claims that Israel’s strikes on Iran violated international law. She says Iran has waged decades of proxy warfare—& Israel is fully within its rights to respond. 'Iran suddenly cares about international law?'

GB News

30,141 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

According to international law, Somaliland is NOT a secessionist or breakaway entity. It was previously an independent country & sought to form a legal union, which was not ratified. Labeling it as secessionist is misleading propaganda by failed state of Somalia. African Union
1:01

According to international law, Somaliland is NOT a secessionist or breakaway entity. It was previously an independent country & sought to form a legal union, which was not ratified. Labeling it as secessionist is misleading propaganda by failed state of Somalia. African Union

✨ CheckMate ✨Bilicsan 🌼💫

34,261 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"What's the legal justification under international law for this action by America & Israel?" Wong: "The legal basis for this is for the US & Israel to explain" "We're not party to the intelligence the US & Israelis are referencing" Aus foreign policy in a nutshell
0:54

"What's the legal justification under international law for this action by America & Israel?" Wong: "The legal basis for this is for the US & Israel to explain" "We're not party to the intelligence the US & Israelis are referencing" Aus foreign policy in a nutshell

jeremy poxon

273,937 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The situation in the South China Sea will not unfold according to People’s Republic of China’s propaganda playbook and bullying tactics. Each infringement and provocation by Beijing in the West Philippine Sea will be exposed to the international community to show how they disrupt the regional stability and blatantly violate the UNCLOS and international law. The instability and rising tension of South China Sea is rooted in PRC’s interest and greed. The Philippines will not be swayed by China because President Bongbong Marcos will never surrender a square inch of our territory to any foreign power, and we will not yield! 📹 Raffy Tima
0:23

The situation in the South China Sea will not unfold according to People’s Republic of China’s propaganda playbook and bullying tactics. Each infringement and provocation by Beijing in the West Philippine Sea will be exposed to the international community to show how they disrupt the regional stability and blatantly violate the UNCLOS and international law. The instability and rising tension of South China Sea is rooted in PRC’s interest and greed. The Philippines will not be swayed by China because President Bongbong Marcos will never surrender a square inch of our territory to any foreign power, and we will not yield! 📹 Raffy Tima

Jay Tarriela

233,749 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

STANDING FIRM: THE PHILIPPINES VS. CHINA’S AGGRESSION IN THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA | While China flexes its muscle, the Philippines stands firm, defending its rights under international law. This is not about war; it’s about justice, sovereignty, and truth. With the support of local government units and the international community, the Philippine government is pushing back—strengthening alliances, enhancing defense, and exposing the lies and aggression. We will not be bullied. Share this video to raise awareness and stand with us in protecting what’s rightfully ours.
2:36

STANDING FIRM: THE PHILIPPINES VS. CHINA’S AGGRESSION IN THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA | While China flexes its muscle, the Philippines stands firm, defending its rights under international law. This is not about war; it’s about justice, sovereignty, and truth. With the support of local government units and the international community, the Philippine government is pushing back—strengthening alliances, enhancing defense, and exposing the lies and aggression. We will not be bullied. Share this video to raise awareness and stand with us in protecting what’s rightfully ours.

BRP Sierra Madre

15,610 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EU has no authority to introduce Digital ID. This is all done by the Banks & International cartels. EU is not a Nation or legitimate & therefore cannot make laws. Do not comply with anything from the EU because they are not a lawful authority
1:38

EU has no authority to introduce Digital ID. This is all done by the Banks & International cartels. EU is not a Nation or legitimate & therefore cannot make laws. Do not comply with anything from the EU because they are not a lawful authority

karma

12,970 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This DOJ Civil Rights Division Division’s Second Amendment Section is firmly protecting every law-abiding citizen’s right to carry. These rights do not protect themselves, & U.S. Department of Justice & this administration will ensure that the Second Amendment is NOT a second-class right!
2:01

This DOJ Civil Rights Division Division’s Second Amendment Section is firmly protecting every law-abiding citizen’s right to carry. These rights do not protect themselves, & U.S. Department of Justice & this administration will ensure that the Second Amendment is NOT a second-class right!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

50,068 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Since I got attacked for calling what Natasha Hausdorff is saying here nonsense, here's the actual legal breakdown. This argument misunderstands how international law works because it mixes together three different legal questions: (1) who has sovereignty, (2) what uti possidetis juris means, (3) what constitutes an occupation. She’s right that uti possidetis juris was meant to preserve existing colonial administrative borders when colonies become independent. It was developed mainly in Latin America and Africa to prevent newly independent states from fighting over borders. But the rule does not say that whichever new state emerges automatically inherits every inch of a former colony. Unlike in Latin America and Africa, there was no single, uncontested successor after the British Mandate in the context of Palestine. The British ended colonial rule, the UN Partition Plan was never implemented as binding law, war broke out, Israel declared independence, Jordan took control of the West Bank, and Egypt administered Gaza. This sequence of events is why international law practitioners generally reject the application of uti possidetis to the Israel/post-Mandate context. Even if someone believes that Israel had a stronger territorial claim in 1967, that still doesn't address the occupation point. Under IHL, occupation is based on effective military control, not on who has the better sovereignty claim. The reason why the law of occupation exists is to protect civilians while territorial disputes remain unresolved. Whether a war was defensive or whether the previous controller had lawful title does not determine whether occupation law applies. This is exactly why the ICJ has consistently held that the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) is occupied territory. The court was fully aware that Jordan's annexation of the West Bank was not widely recognized and that Egypt never claimed sovereignty over Gaza. Even so, it still concluded that Israel is an occupying power because occupation is a question of control, NOT settled sovereignty. Even if uti possidetis applied, she completely ignores the Palestinian right to self-determination, which is distinct from territorial succession claims. International law recognizes both the law of occupation and the Palestinian right to self-determination regardless of unresolved sovereignty claims. These aren’t issues that boil down to a simple political disagreement; the facts can’t be disputed. I encourage her and everyone to look at the relevant ICJ advisory opinions from 2004 and 2024, the ruling in Burkina Faso v. Mali, and Article 42 of the Hague Regulations.
4:07

Since I got attacked for calling what Natasha Hausdorff is saying here nonsense, here's the actual legal breakdown. This argument misunderstands how international law works because it mixes together three different legal questions: (1) who has sovereignty, (2) what uti possidetis juris means, (3) what constitutes an occupation. She’s right that uti possidetis juris was meant to preserve existing colonial administrative borders when colonies become independent. It was developed mainly in Latin America and Africa to prevent newly independent states from fighting over borders. But the rule does not say that whichever new state emerges automatically inherits every inch of a former colony. Unlike in Latin America and Africa, there was no single, uncontested successor after the British Mandate in the context of Palestine. The British ended colonial rule, the UN Partition Plan was never implemented as binding law, war broke out, Israel declared independence, Jordan took control of the West Bank, and Egypt administered Gaza. This sequence of events is why international law practitioners generally reject the application of uti possidetis to the Israel/post-Mandate context. Even if someone believes that Israel had a stronger territorial claim in 1967, that still doesn't address the occupation point. Under IHL, occupation is based on effective military control, not on who has the better sovereignty claim. The reason why the law of occupation exists is to protect civilians while territorial disputes remain unresolved. Whether a war was defensive or whether the previous controller had lawful title does not determine whether occupation law applies. This is exactly why the ICJ has consistently held that the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) is occupied territory. The court was fully aware that Jordan's annexation of the West Bank was not widely recognized and that Egypt never claimed sovereignty over Gaza. Even so, it still concluded that Israel is an occupying power because occupation is a question of control, NOT settled sovereignty. Even if uti possidetis applied, she completely ignores the Palestinian right to self-determination, which is distinct from territorial succession claims. International law recognizes both the law of occupation and the Palestinian right to self-determination regardless of unresolved sovereignty claims. These aren’t issues that boil down to a simple political disagreement; the facts can’t be disputed. I encourage her and everyone to look at the relevant ICJ advisory opinions from 2004 and 2024, the ruling in Burkina Faso v. Mali, and Article 42 of the Hague Regulations.

Ihab Hassan

40,185 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

The People's Republic of China has no jurisdiction over Bajo de Masinloc, which is classified as a rock under the 2016 Arbitral Award and Article 121 of UNCLOS. The Philippines has sovereignty over it, including its territorial sea. The waters beyond Bajo de Masinloc's 12-nautical-mile territorial sea fall within the Philippine EEZ, measured from Luzon's baseline. Consequently, the PCG and BFAR vessels are legitimately patrolling our waters, while it is China that is encroaching upon them and militarizing the area by deploying PLA Navy vessels to shadow PCG operations. The dangerous maneuvers and water cannon harassment by the CCG are not standard law enforcement actions; rather, should be interpreted as unlawful aggression by international law violators.
0:39

The People's Republic of China has no jurisdiction over Bajo de Masinloc, which is classified as a rock under the 2016 Arbitral Award and Article 121 of UNCLOS. The Philippines has sovereignty over it, including its territorial sea. The waters beyond Bajo de Masinloc's 12-nautical-mile territorial sea fall within the Philippine EEZ, measured from Luzon's baseline. Consequently, the PCG and BFAR vessels are legitimately patrolling our waters, while it is China that is encroaching upon them and militarizing the area by deploying PLA Navy vessels to shadow PCG operations. The dangerous maneuvers and water cannon harassment by the CCG are not standard law enforcement actions; rather, should be interpreted as unlawful aggression by international law violators.

Jay Tarriela

37,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A Senegal court has sentenced a man to 6 years in jail for consensual same-sex acts, the first conviction under the new law. This prison sentence is unlawful under international law. Senegal is bound by treaty obligations that protect every person’s right to dignity, privacy and equality.
0:40

A Senegal court has sentenced a man to 6 years in jail for consensual same-sex acts, the first conviction under the new law. This prison sentence is unlawful under international law. Senegal is bound by treaty obligations that protect every person’s right to dignity, privacy and equality.

Human Rights Watch

30,239 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WHEN DIPLOMACY MEETS DISRESPECT: CHINA’S BULLYING HAS GONE TOO FAR 🇵🇭 Since 2022, the Philippines has filed 245 diplomatic protests against China’s aggression in the West Philippine Sea — our own 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone recognized under international law. Yet, the harassment continues. Chinese Coast Guard ships ram our vessels, use military-grade lasers on our crew, block food and fuel deliveries to our troops, and deploy maritime militia and coast guard vessels to intimidate our fishermen and soldiers — even attempting to steal from our waters, all within our rightful territory. These are not “misunderstandings.” They are deliberate acts of bullying by a powerful nation against a smaller one that seeks only peace through law. Even with global condemnation and the 2016 Hague Ruling invalidating China’s “nine-dash line” claim, Beijing continues to act as if our waters are theirs — trampling on international law and showing total disrespect for the sovereignty of smaller nations. We may not match China’s size, but our courage is greater than their intimidation. This is not just a fight for islands — it is a fight for dignity, freedom, and the future of every Filipino who depends on our seas to live and feed their families. 🌊 Our message to the world: You cannot bully a nation that stands united. The West Philippine Sea is ours — by law, by history, by right. Stand firm. Speak up. Share the truth. Defend our seas. #WestPhilippineSea #WestPhilippineSeaAtinIto #sovereigntythroughlaw #notobullyingatsea #StandWithThePhilippines #WestPhilippineSeaIsOurs
0:57

WHEN DIPLOMACY MEETS DISRESPECT: CHINA’S BULLYING HAS GONE TOO FAR 🇵🇭 Since 2022, the Philippines has filed 245 diplomatic protests against China’s aggression in the West Philippine Sea — our own 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone recognized under international law. Yet, the harassment continues. Chinese Coast Guard ships ram our vessels, use military-grade lasers on our crew, block food and fuel deliveries to our troops, and deploy maritime militia and coast guard vessels to intimidate our fishermen and soldiers — even attempting to steal from our waters, all within our rightful territory. These are not “misunderstandings.” They are deliberate acts of bullying by a powerful nation against a smaller one that seeks only peace through law. Even with global condemnation and the 2016 Hague Ruling invalidating China’s “nine-dash line” claim, Beijing continues to act as if our waters are theirs — trampling on international law and showing total disrespect for the sovereignty of smaller nations. We may not match China’s size, but our courage is greater than their intimidation. This is not just a fight for islands — it is a fight for dignity, freedom, and the future of every Filipino who depends on our seas to live and feed their families. 🌊 Our message to the world: You cannot bully a nation that stands united. The West Philippine Sea is ours — by law, by history, by right. Stand firm. Speak up. Share the truth. Defend our seas. #WestPhilippineSea #WestPhilippineSeaAtinIto #sovereigntythroughlaw #notobullyingatsea #StandWithThePhilippines #WestPhilippineSeaIsOurs

BRP Sierra Madre

34,370 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Every American should hear this. air is critical to understanding how far the capture of institutions has gone. The ABA should be dismantled. It is a holdover from the British & a law degree should be enough to practice law. The ABA is not needed.
5:31

Every American should hear this. air is critical to understanding how far the capture of institutions has gone. The ABA should be dismantled. It is a holdover from the British & a law degree should be enough to practice law. The ABA is not needed.

Lara Logan

86,491 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

For the first time, China’s Defense Ministry has made it clear: Zhongye Dao is China’s sacred and inviolable territory. The Philippines can abandon its fantasy of coveting land that does not belong to it. This entire South China Sea drama is built on one dirty logic: provoke China, hide behind America, cry “small country” when China responds, then sell the performance as sovereignty. But sovereignty is not a pity card. The Philippines grounded that rusting warship on Ren’ai Jiao one day after the U.S. bombed China’s embassy in Belgrade. Chinese blood had not even dried, and Manila moved to seize Chinese territory. That was a blood debt written into the reef. A country that builds its “sovereignty” by stepping over Chinese corpses has no moral ground to cry victim when China comes to collect its own territory back. For decades, Manila has survived by kneeling to whoever arrived with a bigger flag: When Spanish colonists arrived, it knelt before Spain. When American colonists arrived, it knelt before America. When Japanese fascists arrived, it knelt before Japan’s fascists. When Japanese fascists left, it continued kneeling before America. The Philippines may be poor, but it has many masters. Now it wants to play victim while acting as Washington’s rented knife in the South China Sea. China has negotiated enough. China has tolerated enough. China has shown enough restraint to people who read restraint as permission. Zhongye Dao is Chinese territory. Ren’ai Jiao is Chinese territory. Nansha Qundao is Chinese territory. Political shows staged by Philippine officials cannot change history, law, or power. The circus ends. Sovereignty returns to the owner.
0:57

For the first time, China’s Defense Ministry has made it clear: Zhongye Dao is China’s sacred and inviolable territory. The Philippines can abandon its fantasy of coveting land that does not belong to it. This entire South China Sea drama is built on one dirty logic: provoke China, hide behind America, cry “small country” when China responds, then sell the performance as sovereignty. But sovereignty is not a pity card. The Philippines grounded that rusting warship on Ren’ai Jiao one day after the U.S. bombed China’s embassy in Belgrade. Chinese blood had not even dried, and Manila moved to seize Chinese territory. That was a blood debt written into the reef. A country that builds its “sovereignty” by stepping over Chinese corpses has no moral ground to cry victim when China comes to collect its own territory back. For decades, Manila has survived by kneeling to whoever arrived with a bigger flag: When Spanish colonists arrived, it knelt before Spain. When American colonists arrived, it knelt before America. When Japanese fascists arrived, it knelt before Japan’s fascists. When Japanese fascists left, it continued kneeling before America. The Philippines may be poor, but it has many masters. Now it wants to play victim while acting as Washington’s rented knife in the South China Sea. China has negotiated enough. China has tolerated enough. China has shown enough restraint to people who read restraint as permission. Zhongye Dao is Chinese territory. Ren’ai Jiao is Chinese territory. Nansha Qundao is Chinese territory. Political shows staged by Philippine officials cannot change history, law, or power. The circus ends. Sovereignty returns to the owner.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

37,070 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen