Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

China's 'secret weapon' against Western misconceptions Direct visits are China's most powerful tool to counter European misconceptions, according to Carsten Boyer Thogersen, former consul general of Denmark in China's Shanghai and Guangzhou. He traces current misunderstandings to 2018 when China-U.S. relations deteriorated and European visits to China declined, creating... show more

China Says

202,964 subscribers

3,136,031 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Why the West overlooks China's cooperation blueprint The West is making a critical mistake by overlooking China's global initiatives that offer solutions for international cooperation, says Carsten Boyer Thogersen, former consul general of Denmark in China's Shanghai and Guangzhou. He warns that today's confrontational atmosphere has corrupted logical discourse, leading to widespread misinformation in discussions about China. Thogersen points to the Belt and Road Initiative's 12-year track record of concrete partnerships as proof that China's peace-focused visions deliver real results when given attention.

Why the West overlooks China's cooperation blueprint The West is making a critical mistake by overlooking China's global initiatives that offer solutions for international cooperation, says Carsten Boyer Thogersen, former consul general of Denmark in China's Shanghai and Guangzhou. He warns that today's confrontational atmosphere has corrupted logical discourse, leading to widespread misinformation in discussions about China. Thogersen points to the Belt and Road Initiative's 12-year track record of concrete partnerships as proof that China's peace-focused visions deliver real results when given attention.

China Says

2,188,699 次观看 • 9 个月前

Europe's future depends on partnering with Africa Africa could soon dwarf Europe in global influence, making deeper cooperation essential for Europe's future, according to Carsten Boyer Thogersen, former consul general of Denmark in China's Shanghai and Guangzhou. He describes that while Europe has shrunk from 25% to just 8% of the world's population, Africa has surged to over one-sixth, creating a demographic powerhouse on Europe's doorstep. Yet European leaders haven't even begun serious discussions about building partnerships with this increasingly vital neighbor.

Europe's future depends on partnering with Africa Africa could soon dwarf Europe in global influence, making deeper cooperation essential for Europe's future, according to Carsten Boyer Thogersen, former consul general of Denmark in China's Shanghai and Guangzhou. He describes that while Europe has shrunk from 25% to just 8% of the world's population, Africa has surged to over one-sixth, creating a demographic powerhouse on Europe's doorstep. Yet European leaders haven't even begun serious discussions about building partnerships with this increasingly vital neighbor.

China Says

1,761,934 次观看 • 9 个月前

Diplomacy Talk | Europe must move beyond US-centric China approach Europe must avoid getting "stuck" in a U.S.-centric framework when dealing with China and instead develop its own strategic independence, says Carsten Boyer Thogersen, a former Danish diplomat who has worked with China for over 45 years. In this wide-ranging interview with "Diplomacy Talk," Thogersen — who served as consul-general in both Shanghai and Guangzhou — says China and the EU have many common concerns and challenges, with numerous areas for beneficial cooperation. However, Thogersen stresses that Western misunderstandings and a confrontational tone can hinder cooperation. To counter this, he encourages more Europeans to experience China in person, especially now that they can easily visit the country under its expanded visa-free and transit policies. Thogersen also discusses demographic shifts, global trade frameworks such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the need for cultural understanding and collaboration in an increasingly multipolar world.

Diplomacy Talk | Europe must move beyond US-centric China approach Europe must avoid getting "stuck" in a U.S.-centric framework when dealing with China and instead develop its own strategic independence, says Carsten Boyer Thogersen, a former Danish diplomat who has worked with China for over 45 years. In this wide-ranging interview with "Diplomacy Talk," Thogersen — who served as consul-general in both Shanghai and Guangzhou — says China and the EU have many common concerns and challenges, with numerous areas for beneficial cooperation. However, Thogersen stresses that Western misunderstandings and a confrontational tone can hinder cooperation. To counter this, he encourages more Europeans to experience China in person, especially now that they can easily visit the country under its expanded visa-free and transit policies. Thogersen also discusses demographic shifts, global trade frameworks such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the need for cultural understanding and collaboration in an increasingly multipolar world.

China Says

368,324 次观看 • 10 个月前

China's governance model resonates with Pacific leaders "The answers to the development challenges faced by Vanuatu can all be found in China," said Charlot Salwai, former prime minister of Vanuatu. And he's not the only one who thinks so. In this video, Li Minggang, China's ambassador to Vanuatu, explains why Pacific leaders are looking to China's governance model. What is most appealing to China’s friends is "the two remarkable feats": growing the economy fast for over four decades and keeping society stable. It's a model, Li says, that more and more countries want to learn from.

China's governance model resonates with Pacific leaders "The answers to the development challenges faced by Vanuatu can all be found in China," said Charlot Salwai, former prime minister of Vanuatu. And he's not the only one who thinks so. In this video, Li Minggang, China's ambassador to Vanuatu, explains why Pacific leaders are looking to China's governance model. What is most appealing to China’s friends is "the two remarkable feats": growing the economy fast for over four decades and keeping society stable. It's a model, Li says, that more and more countries want to learn from.

China Says

2,160,608 次观看 • 5 个月前

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.

2018 - 2020 CIA PRC Report shows that the CCP wanted President Trump to lose the next election and leveraged all domestic and foreign elements that were opposed to the U.S. President in an effort to reduce the President's votes and make him resign or prevent re-election. China was also working to influence the results of the mid-terms and the 2020 Election. China was analyzing 2016 election data and states that voted for Trump and was attempting to induce negative financial consequences for these states by levying tariffs on exports to China from those sectors. As of mid-2018, China's ultimate goal was for President Trump NOT to get re-elected. China also used a number of means to influence U.S. officials. China extended invitations to influential U.S. individuals to travel to China for speaking engagements, which they were paid, along with first-class travel and accommodation. This was effective particularly with think tank officials, academics, and former U.S. government employees. The goal was to get these individuals "hooked on China." By doing so, China relied on hitting these entities in the wallet to force them to talk with the U.S. President about tariffs. China's 2019 goal was to gain advantage over U.S. policy and to direct additional, unspecified resources toward political swing states, as China assessed these states would play a crucial role for the 2020 U.S. presidential election. China's 2019 strategy against the U.S. was to undermine domestic confidence in President Trump. The strategy included efforts to use Chinese contracts with big U.S. companies to influence U.S. business leaders to turn them against President Trump. China sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on Trump and pay them to write negative articles about him. The Chinese government wanted President Trump to lose the next election.

The SCIF

44,307 次观看 • 10 天前

Watch our new episode, “China still needs the West. Xi puts his hopes on the business community.”, here (premiere @ 7:30 PM EST) 👉 “Xi Jinping recently met again with a group of American business and academic leaders. Over the past year, such meetings have become a hallmark of Xi's leadership. Figures from Silicon Valley to Wall Street have been spun like a carousel by his presence. Xi Jinping has personally shown them China's promising economic prospects while loudly reassuring them of China's unwavering commitment to reform and opening-up, creating favorable conditions to attract foreign investment. From Bill Gates to Elon Musk to Stephen A. Schwarzman, Xi Jinping has consistently emphasized one concept: the hope for Sino-US relations lies in the people. What he really meant was that the hope for China-US relations lies in the business community. Given China's irreversible population decline and the uncertain future of the global electric vehicle market, on which China relies heavily to offset the real estate slump, China is trying to court the next wave of Western companies that can provide money and technology to help China's industrial upgrading. China needs the Western market, too. But will Xi succeed?”

Watch our new episode, “China still needs the West. Xi puts his hopes on the business community.”, here (premiere @ 7:30 PM EST) 👉 “Xi Jinping recently met again with a group of American business and academic leaders. Over the past year, such meetings have become a hallmark of Xi's leadership. Figures from Silicon Valley to Wall Street have been spun like a carousel by his presence. Xi Jinping has personally shown them China's promising economic prospects while loudly reassuring them of China's unwavering commitment to reform and opening-up, creating favorable conditions to attract foreign investment. From Bill Gates to Elon Musk to Stephen A. Schwarzman, Xi Jinping has consistently emphasized one concept: the hope for Sino-US relations lies in the people. What he really meant was that the hope for China-US relations lies in the business community. Given China's irreversible population decline and the uncertain future of the global electric vehicle market, on which China relies heavily to offset the real estate slump, China is trying to court the next wave of Western companies that can provide money and technology to help China's industrial upgrading. China needs the Western market, too. But will Xi succeed?”

Simone Gao

13,119 次观看 • 2 年前

Diplomacy Talk | China brings stability, certainty to global climate efforts China's approach to climate governance has brought stability and certainty to the global fight against climate change, according to Wei Ke, a research scientist at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In this episode of "Diplomacy Talk," Wei explains how China's visionary climate policies and its plan to cut emissions are setting an example for other countries. At the same time, China is also providing concrete assistance: its green technology is helping other nations, especially those in the Global South, achieve cleaner growth and better tackle climate challenges. At a time when some Western nations are backtracking on their climate commitments, China is stepping up as a dependable leader, according to Wei. This, he says, gives the world a clearer path to a cleaner and more sustainable future.

Diplomacy Talk | China brings stability, certainty to global climate efforts China's approach to climate governance has brought stability and certainty to the global fight against climate change, according to Wei Ke, a research scientist at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In this episode of "Diplomacy Talk," Wei explains how China's visionary climate policies and its plan to cut emissions are setting an example for other countries. At the same time, China is also providing concrete assistance: its green technology is helping other nations, especially those in the Global South, achieve cleaner growth and better tackle climate challenges. At a time when some Western nations are backtracking on their climate commitments, China is stepping up as a dependable leader, according to Wei. This, he says, gives the world a clearer path to a cleaner and more sustainable future.

China Says

422,326 次观看 • 7 个月前

Against all odds - 🇨🇳China's Space Exploration program 1994 - 2024🚀🛰️ 1994 - China applied to join the International Space Station, but was denied and declared "untrustworthy" by the U.S. 1993 - The United States shut down their GPS targeting the Chinese container ship Yinhe, leaving the ship stranded at sea and unable to navigate for 33 days - after being falsely accused by the US of carrying chemical weapons precursors to Iran 1996 - The United States turned off its GPS in the South China Sea, forcing China's missile tracking to fail 2003 - China applied to join the EU's Galileo global satellite navigation system, paid €230 million but was eventually forced out by the EU 2011 - The United States passed the Wolf Amendment Law, which prohibits NASA from cooperating with China in space Despite being stigmatized and isolated, Chinese scientists and taikonauts remained determined and worked hard to become self-sufficient 1999.11.20 - Shenzhou 1 - China's first spacecraft - where the dream began! 2000 - The first experimental BeiDou Navigation Satellite was launched 2003 - Shenzhou 5 - China's dream of flying into Space came true! Taikonaut Yang Liwei (杨利伟) was blasted successfully into space as part of China's Shenzhou 5 mission. China became the third country to launch a person into space independently, after the Soviet Union and the United States 2005 - Shenzhou 6 - Fèi Jùnlóng (费俊龙) and Niè Hǎishèng (聂海胜) launched into space aboard the Long March 2F carrier rocket. It marked the official second launch of China's manned spaceflight program and the start of crewed scientific research in space 2007 - The first lunar exploration probe Chang'e 1, part of the first phase of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program, was launched and successfully orbited the moon, marking the third milestone in China's space program 2007 - The BeiDou-1 navigation system was completed and began operation in China. The fourth positioning system, next to the American GPS, Russian GLONASS, and European Galileo 2008 - Shenzhou 7 - Taikonauts Zhai Zhigang (翟志刚) and Liu Boming (刘伯明) completed China's first "Spacewalk" extra-vehicular activity (EVA) 2011 - The Tiangong-1 prototype space station was launched, marking the start of construction on China's first space station 2016 - marks the launch of Tiangong-2, China's first space laboratory. Tiangong-2 was not constructed or planned to be permanent, but rather as a test-bed for critical technologies utilized for the final Tiangong Space station 2020 - Chang'e 5 marks China's first lunar landing retrieving lunar soil. For the first time in 44 years, humans have brought back rock and soil samples from the moon 2020 - China's BeiDou-3 navigation system provides complete full global coverage 2020: Mars - here we come! China launched Tianwen-1, China's first Mars probe 2022: China completed construction of its permanently crewed Tiangong space station 2024 - Chang'e 6 mission: China became the first nation to land and return lunar soil samples from the far side of the moon It took China 28 years and the sacrifice of countless heroes risking their lives working day and night to overcome China's Western-imposed isolation and construct its own space station and global navigation system, and to become a leader in space exploration 🇨🇳🫡

Against all odds - 🇨🇳China's Space Exploration program 1994 - 2024🚀🛰️ 1994 - China applied to join the International Space Station, but was denied and declared "untrustworthy" by the U.S. 1993 - The United States shut down their GPS targeting the Chinese container ship Yinhe, leaving the ship stranded at sea and unable to navigate for 33 days - after being falsely accused by the US of carrying chemical weapons precursors to Iran 1996 - The United States turned off its GPS in the South China Sea, forcing China's missile tracking to fail 2003 - China applied to join the EU's Galileo global satellite navigation system, paid €230 million but was eventually forced out by the EU 2011 - The United States passed the Wolf Amendment Law, which prohibits NASA from cooperating with China in space Despite being stigmatized and isolated, Chinese scientists and taikonauts remained determined and worked hard to become self-sufficient 1999.11.20 - Shenzhou 1 - China's first spacecraft - where the dream began! 2000 - The first experimental BeiDou Navigation Satellite was launched 2003 - Shenzhou 5 - China's dream of flying into Space came true! Taikonaut Yang Liwei (杨利伟) was blasted successfully into space as part of China's Shenzhou 5 mission. China became the third country to launch a person into space independently, after the Soviet Union and the United States 2005 - Shenzhou 6 - Fèi Jùnlóng (费俊龙) and Niè Hǎishèng (聂海胜) launched into space aboard the Long March 2F carrier rocket. It marked the official second launch of China's manned spaceflight program and the start of crewed scientific research in space 2007 - The first lunar exploration probe Chang'e 1, part of the first phase of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program, was launched and successfully orbited the moon, marking the third milestone in China's space program 2007 - The BeiDou-1 navigation system was completed and began operation in China. The fourth positioning system, next to the American GPS, Russian GLONASS, and European Galileo 2008 - Shenzhou 7 - Taikonauts Zhai Zhigang (翟志刚) and Liu Boming (刘伯明) completed China's first "Spacewalk" extra-vehicular activity (EVA) 2011 - The Tiangong-1 prototype space station was launched, marking the start of construction on China's first space station 2016 - marks the launch of Tiangong-2, China's first space laboratory. Tiangong-2 was not constructed or planned to be permanent, but rather as a test-bed for critical technologies utilized for the final Tiangong Space station 2020 - Chang'e 5 marks China's first lunar landing retrieving lunar soil. For the first time in 44 years, humans have brought back rock and soil samples from the moon 2020 - China's BeiDou-3 navigation system provides complete full global coverage 2020: Mars - here we come! China launched Tianwen-1, China's first Mars probe 2022: China completed construction of its permanently crewed Tiangong space station 2024 - Chang'e 6 mission: China became the first nation to land and return lunar soil samples from the far side of the moon It took China 28 years and the sacrifice of countless heroes risking their lives working day and night to overcome China's Western-imposed isolation and construct its own space station and global navigation system, and to become a leader in space exploration 🇨🇳🫡

StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭

108,875 次观看 • 2 年前

After trekking over 10,000 kilometers from France to China over 400 days, French youths Loic and Benjamin described the country as "diverse, warm, and profound". Starting in September 2024, they walked through more than 10 countries and are now heading for Shanghai. Along the way, they were moved by the hospitality of strangers and amazed by China's modern cities, diverse culture, and expansive landscapes.

After trekking over 10,000 kilometers from France to China over 400 days, French youths Loic and Benjamin described the country as "diverse, warm, and profound". Starting in September 2024, they walked through more than 10 countries and are now heading for Shanghai. Along the way, they were moved by the hospitality of strangers and amazed by China's modern cities, diverse culture, and expansive landscapes.

This is Lanzhou

10,234 次观看 • 7 个月前

"If you want war, you will get war. If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed. China will not fire the first shot, but China will not allow you to fire the second shot." In the realm of global geopolitics, Victor Gao, a prominent Chinese geopolitical analyst and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping, has emerged as a vocal advocate for China's principled stance on international relations. His recent statement encapsulates China's resolute commitment to peace while underscoring its unyielding resolve to defend sovereignty and national interests. This declaration, shared widely across platforms, reflects China's defensive posture amid escalating tensions with the United States, particularly over issues like trade, technology, and regional security. Belligerence, NO! Gao's words stem from a deep understanding of China's historical trajectory. Since the reform and opening-up era initiated by Deng in 1978, China has achieved unprecedented economic miracles without resorting to military aggression or colonial exploitation. Today, it stands as the world's largest economy by purchasing power parity, producing over 45% of global industrial goods, and leading in infrastructure like high-speed rail networks that connect nations and foster prosperity. This peaceful rise has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty, demonstrating China's model of "win-win" cooperation through initiatives like the Belt & Road, which enhance global connectivity & economic interdependence. In contrast to Western narratives of hegemony, China adheres to Deng's pledge: it will never seek to dominate others, nor tolerate domination itself. He addresses perceived US provocations, including tariffs, technology bans, and military encirclements in the Asia-Pacific. Gao warns that attempts at "decoupling" from China are not only futile but catastrophic, as they sever vital supply chains—such as rare earth elements critical for US defense—and risk plunging humanity into conflict. He critiques US overreach, citing trillions wasted on wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, and ongoing support for conflicts like those in Gaza, which he labels as "crimes against humanity." Such actions, Gao argues, accelerate American decline while China focuses on building—generating 250% more electricity than the US and outpacing it in industrial output. China's military advancements, including superiority in conventional and nuclear capabilities in certain domains, serve purely for defense, ensuring no aggressor can threaten its core interests without facing overwhelming retaliation. Yet, China's approach remains fundamentally peaceful. It has not fired a shot in foreign wars for decades, advocating for dialogue, free trade & mutual respect. Gao emphasizes that true security comes from collaboration, not confrontation: "There will be no fair trade without free trade." He invites the US to partner in reindustrialization, offering expertise to revive American manufacturing jobs, provided infrastructure upgrades occur. This olive branch highlights China's maturity—willing to engage as equals, not adversaries. In essence, Gao's warning is a call for wisdom. Provoking China invites mutual destruction in an interconnected "global village," where war benefits no one. Instead, embracing China's vision of shared prosperity could avert disaster. By championing justice—such as the 2-state solution for Palestine & UN membership for all nations—China models ethical leadership. Its restraint in not initiating conflict, paired with unbreakable defense, ensures stability for the Global South & beyond. As Gao asserts, peace is inevitable if misunderstandings are bridged through respect. China's story is one of resilience & benevolence, proving that true power lies in uplifting humanity, not subjugating it. In a world teetering on brinkmanship, China's stance offers hope: development over devastation, harmony over hostility. China is indeed the 21st Century World Superpower

"If you want war, you will get war. If you want to destroy China, you will be destroyed. China will not fire the first shot, but China will not allow you to fire the second shot." In the realm of global geopolitics, Victor Gao, a prominent Chinese geopolitical analyst and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping, has emerged as a vocal advocate for China's principled stance on international relations. His recent statement encapsulates China's resolute commitment to peace while underscoring its unyielding resolve to defend sovereignty and national interests. This declaration, shared widely across platforms, reflects China's defensive posture amid escalating tensions with the United States, particularly over issues like trade, technology, and regional security. Belligerence, NO! Gao's words stem from a deep understanding of China's historical trajectory. Since the reform and opening-up era initiated by Deng in 1978, China has achieved unprecedented economic miracles without resorting to military aggression or colonial exploitation. Today, it stands as the world's largest economy by purchasing power parity, producing over 45% of global industrial goods, and leading in infrastructure like high-speed rail networks that connect nations and foster prosperity. This peaceful rise has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty, demonstrating China's model of "win-win" cooperation through initiatives like the Belt & Road, which enhance global connectivity & economic interdependence. In contrast to Western narratives of hegemony, China adheres to Deng's pledge: it will never seek to dominate others, nor tolerate domination itself. He addresses perceived US provocations, including tariffs, technology bans, and military encirclements in the Asia-Pacific. Gao warns that attempts at "decoupling" from China are not only futile but catastrophic, as they sever vital supply chains—such as rare earth elements critical for US defense—and risk plunging humanity into conflict. He critiques US overreach, citing trillions wasted on wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, and ongoing support for conflicts like those in Gaza, which he labels as "crimes against humanity." Such actions, Gao argues, accelerate American decline while China focuses on building—generating 250% more electricity than the US and outpacing it in industrial output. China's military advancements, including superiority in conventional and nuclear capabilities in certain domains, serve purely for defense, ensuring no aggressor can threaten its core interests without facing overwhelming retaliation. Yet, China's approach remains fundamentally peaceful. It has not fired a shot in foreign wars for decades, advocating for dialogue, free trade & mutual respect. Gao emphasizes that true security comes from collaboration, not confrontation: "There will be no fair trade without free trade." He invites the US to partner in reindustrialization, offering expertise to revive American manufacturing jobs, provided infrastructure upgrades occur. This olive branch highlights China's maturity—willing to engage as equals, not adversaries. In essence, Gao's warning is a call for wisdom. Provoking China invites mutual destruction in an interconnected "global village," where war benefits no one. Instead, embracing China's vision of shared prosperity could avert disaster. By championing justice—such as the 2-state solution for Palestine & UN membership for all nations—China models ethical leadership. Its restraint in not initiating conflict, paired with unbreakable defense, ensures stability for the Global South & beyond. As Gao asserts, peace is inevitable if misunderstandings are bridged through respect. China's story is one of resilience & benevolence, proving that true power lies in uplifting humanity, not subjugating it. In a world teetering on brinkmanship, China's stance offers hope: development over devastation, harmony over hostility. China is indeed the 21st Century World Superpower

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇷🇺

22,749 次观看 • 9 个月前

During an exclusive interview with China Daily, Zhu Guangyao, former vice-minister of finance of China, stated that the United States' #economy and #China's economy are very interconnected, with the reciprocal #tariffs putting China-US #trade in a very difficult situation. Zhu stressed that the only right way for the #US is returning to real communication with China based on mutual respect and win-win cooperation. #ChinaPerspective

During an exclusive interview with China Daily, Zhu Guangyao, former vice-minister of finance of China, stated that the United States' #economy and #China's economy are very interconnected, with the reciprocal #tariffs putting China-US #trade in a very difficult situation. Zhu stressed that the only right way for the #US is returning to real communication with China based on mutual respect and win-win cooperation. #ChinaPerspective

China Daily

85,531 次观看 • 1 年前

We've just arrived in Yabuli, a famous ski resort in China's Heilongjiang province, where we'll be staying for the next 4 days. We're staying in Club Med. This Club Med was the first one to open in China, in 2010. Since then, they've opened an additional 9 and of course the company itself was bought by China's Fosun group. Winter sports are becoming more and more popular in China, with most ski stations being located either in China's Northeast (where we are) or in Xinjiang. Even today, a Friday mid-afternoon that's not on a school or bank holiday, we can see a lot of people on the slopes.

We've just arrived in Yabuli, a famous ski resort in China's Heilongjiang province, where we'll be staying for the next 4 days. We're staying in Club Med. This Club Med was the first one to open in China, in 2010. Since then, they've opened an additional 9 and of course the company itself was bought by China's Fosun group. Winter sports are becoming more and more popular in China, with most ski stations being located either in China's Northeast (where we are) or in Xinjiang. Even today, a Friday mid-afternoon that's not on a school or bank holiday, we can see a lot of people on the slopes.

Arnaud Bertrand

32,566 次观看 • 1 年前

Chinese Hamza in on duty Tell me the last time this clown prince visited Nicobar island before this? So what changed suddenly that Rahul Gandhi even left the Bengal elections midway to suddenly 'save forests' in Nicobar or save China from Great Nicobar Project? This sudden sympathy for tribals is not organic. It is a direct reaction to protect China's interests. The Great Nicobar Project is India's ultimate weapon to control the Strait of Malacca, China's biggest transit route Look at the ecosystem's lies: FACT 1: The local tribals have officially given their NOC. FACT 2: The Strait of Malacca handles 29% of Global oil flow. Great Nicobar sits right at its edge. If India chokes this point, China's economy collapses. The Great Nicobar Project essentially puts China's neck in India's hands. FACT 3: The new infrastructure is explicitly designed to deploy Indian submarines and Rafale jets When the tribal and tortoise narratives started failing, they resorted to a fake heatwave panic. Modern warfare is about choking the enemy's economy, and India just turned the table with China’s neck in our hand

Chinese Hamza in on duty Tell me the last time this clown prince visited Nicobar island before this? So what changed suddenly that Rahul Gandhi even left the Bengal elections midway to suddenly 'save forests' in Nicobar or save China from Great Nicobar Project? This sudden sympathy for tribals is not organic. It is a direct reaction to protect China's interests. The Great Nicobar Project is India's ultimate weapon to control the Strait of Malacca, China's biggest transit route Look at the ecosystem's lies: FACT 1: The local tribals have officially given their NOC. FACT 2: The Strait of Malacca handles 29% of Global oil flow. Great Nicobar sits right at its edge. If India chokes this point, China's economy collapses. The Great Nicobar Project essentially puts China's neck in India's hands. FACT 3: The new infrastructure is explicitly designed to deploy Indian submarines and Rafale jets When the tribal and tortoise narratives started failing, they resorted to a fake heatwave panic. Modern warfare is about choking the enemy's economy, and India just turned the table with China’s neck in our hand

Hardik

38,493 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."

Arnaud Bertrand

395,098 次观看 • 2 年前

After Japan's new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi claimed that a Taiwan "emergency" could constitute a "survival-threatening situation", some Western commentators labeled China's full-spectrum diplomatic response an "overreaction". But before talking about China's reaction, we must be honest about what Japan escalated first. "Survival crisis" is a legal war trigger under Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing the use of force even when Japan isn't attacked. This is the first time a Japanese prime minister has implied Japan could enter a war with China over Taiwan — a matter that is purely China's internal affair. Meanwhile, Japan is re-militarizing, mirroring the 1930s, when Japan used the logic of "existential fear" to justify its invasions. With unresolved wartime history, this is an alarm bell China cannot ignore. And claims that China is "ungrateful" for Japan's ODA are pure gaslighting. In fact, Japan's ODA to China was not charity. Over 80% was loans, not free money. And China had to spend the money on Japanese companies, equipment and contractors. In the end, Japan earned far more from China than it ever "gave". So, China's response is not an overreaction; it is a responsible government acting responsibly. #MediaUnlocked

After Japan's new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi claimed that a Taiwan "emergency" could constitute a "survival-threatening situation", some Western commentators labeled China's full-spectrum diplomatic response an "overreaction". But before talking about China's reaction, we must be honest about what Japan escalated first. "Survival crisis" is a legal war trigger under Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing the use of force even when Japan isn't attacked. This is the first time a Japanese prime minister has implied Japan could enter a war with China over Taiwan — a matter that is purely China's internal affair. Meanwhile, Japan is re-militarizing, mirroring the 1930s, when Japan used the logic of "existential fear" to justify its invasions. With unresolved wartime history, this is an alarm bell China cannot ignore. And claims that China is "ungrateful" for Japan's ODA are pure gaslighting. In fact, Japan's ODA to China was not charity. Over 80% was loans, not free money. And China had to spend the money on Japanese companies, equipment and contractors. In the end, Japan earned far more from China than it ever "gave". So, China's response is not an overreaction; it is a responsible government acting responsibly. #MediaUnlocked

MediaUnlocked

11,324 次观看 • 8 个月前

China remains a developing country despite its progress China remains a developing country though it has achieved a miracle in economic growth and global trade gains, says Zhou Yongmei, Professor of Practice in Institutional Development at Peking University's Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development. Even as China's economy rises, its per capita GDP is only one-sixth that of the U.S., and there are differences in wealth across regions and between urban and rural areas. Zhou notes there is still much to be done to raise the overall development of the society.

China remains a developing country despite its progress China remains a developing country though it has achieved a miracle in economic growth and global trade gains, says Zhou Yongmei, Professor of Practice in Institutional Development at Peking University's Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development. Even as China's economy rises, its per capita GDP is only one-sixth that of the U.S., and there are differences in wealth across regions and between urban and rural areas. Zhou notes there is still much to be done to raise the overall development of the society.

China Says

11,767 次观看 • 1 年前

Economist Hussein Askary says the latest U.S strikes didn't just hit an Iranian railway, they struck China's New Silk Road. He said that specific railway is one of the key arteries linking China to Central Asia, Iran, and, ultimately, the wider Middle East. A modern version of the ancient Silk Road, the physical backbone of China's vision for the region. Hussein believes the strike was symbolic: a warning that countries betting their future on China's Belt and Road Initiative should understand there may be a price for doing so. And what he thinks comes after it is even more concerning. Trump promised to end America's endless wars, but Washington still has no vision for what peace actually looks like, whereas China does. Railways, ports, industrial zones, manufacturing, energy projects, technology transfers, and long-term investment. While the U.S is trying to shape the region through military power, China understands economic integration is a much stronger force. Hussein pointed to China's role in helping bring Saudi and Iran back to the negotiating table, the rapid expansion of industrial cooperation across the Gulf, and the growing network of transport corridors connecting the region to Asia. In his view, those projects are changing the Middle East far more profoundly than most headlines suggest. That's also why he thinks this war is about far more than Iran; it's about who gets to shape the next economic map of Eurasia. His argument is that the old model, export oil, import everything else, and depend on American military protection, is steadily giving way to something different. Countries across the region are trying to build industries instead of simply exporting raw materials. And they're increasingly looking to the east as well as the west.

Economist Hussein Askary says the latest U.S strikes didn't just hit an Iranian railway, they struck China's New Silk Road. He said that specific railway is one of the key arteries linking China to Central Asia, Iran, and, ultimately, the wider Middle East. A modern version of the ancient Silk Road, the physical backbone of China's vision for the region. Hussein believes the strike was symbolic: a warning that countries betting their future on China's Belt and Road Initiative should understand there may be a price for doing so. And what he thinks comes after it is even more concerning. Trump promised to end America's endless wars, but Washington still has no vision for what peace actually looks like, whereas China does. Railways, ports, industrial zones, manufacturing, energy projects, technology transfers, and long-term investment. While the U.S is trying to shape the region through military power, China understands economic integration is a much stronger force. Hussein pointed to China's role in helping bring Saudi and Iran back to the negotiating table, the rapid expansion of industrial cooperation across the Gulf, and the growing network of transport corridors connecting the region to Asia. In his view, those projects are changing the Middle East far more profoundly than most headlines suggest. That's also why he thinks this war is about far more than Iran; it's about who gets to shape the next economic map of Eurasia. His argument is that the old model, export oil, import everything else, and depend on American military protection, is steadily giving way to something different. Countries across the region are trying to build industries instead of simply exporting raw materials. And they're increasingly looking to the east as well as the west.

Mario Nawfal

326,093 次观看 • 18 天前

There is no overstating how extraordinary this speech on China by Indonesian president Prabowo is. Especially if you know Indonesia's history during the Cold War, and Prabowo's personal history as a US-trained military officer, one of Suharto's most feared generals and his son-in-law. He was speaking on the occasion of the visit of Li Qiang, China's Premier, and praised China's "constant opposition to oppression, imperialism, colonialism and apartheid", and "not just now when China's economy has become strong, but even when China was still developing." Everyone should read the "The Jakarta Method" by Vincent Bevins to learn more about Indonesia's role during the Cold War. But as a quick summary, Indonesia began the Cold War as a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement -Sukarno hosted the famous 1955 Bandung Conference that brought together Asian and African nations seeking a "third way" between the US and the Soviet Union. However, in 1965-66, General Suharto seized power from Sukarno and immediately launched one of the Cold War's bloodiest purges. With US and British support and using CIA-provided kill lists, Suharto systematically slaughtered an estimated 500,000 to over one million suspected communists, leftists, and ethnic Chinese. Suharto then remained in power for the next 3 decades as the most consequential US ally in South-East Asia. Which is why now hearing Prabowo, a general under Suharto and his son-in-law, praising China's anti-imperialist record, including "when China was still developing" (meaning during the Cold War), is so remarkable. You could of course cynically point out that this is hypocritical given Prabowo's past. But first and foremost it goes to show how completely the geopolitical landscape has been transformed since the Cold War, and therefore how unlikely it is to see a replay of the same dynamics in Asia. Very striking too is how Prabowo singles out China's defense of Palestinians as a source of pride "for us all" - quite a statement from the leader of the world's largest Muslim nation. And an illustration of the US's complete failure at creating a rift between the Muslim world and China with the Xinjiang narrative. In fact it illustrates that the rift is very much between the Muslim world - as well as the Global South in general - and the West. China is increasingly seen as the moral leader on issues that matter, the "defender of the oppressed", when the West is seen as the imperialist oppressor.

There is no overstating how extraordinary this speech on China by Indonesian president Prabowo is. Especially if you know Indonesia's history during the Cold War, and Prabowo's personal history as a US-trained military officer, one of Suharto's most feared generals and his son-in-law. He was speaking on the occasion of the visit of Li Qiang, China's Premier, and praised China's "constant opposition to oppression, imperialism, colonialism and apartheid", and "not just now when China's economy has become strong, but even when China was still developing." Everyone should read the "The Jakarta Method" by Vincent Bevins to learn more about Indonesia's role during the Cold War. But as a quick summary, Indonesia began the Cold War as a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement -Sukarno hosted the famous 1955 Bandung Conference that brought together Asian and African nations seeking a "third way" between the US and the Soviet Union. However, in 1965-66, General Suharto seized power from Sukarno and immediately launched one of the Cold War's bloodiest purges. With US and British support and using CIA-provided kill lists, Suharto systematically slaughtered an estimated 500,000 to over one million suspected communists, leftists, and ethnic Chinese. Suharto then remained in power for the next 3 decades as the most consequential US ally in South-East Asia. Which is why now hearing Prabowo, a general under Suharto and his son-in-law, praising China's anti-imperialist record, including "when China was still developing" (meaning during the Cold War), is so remarkable. You could of course cynically point out that this is hypocritical given Prabowo's past. But first and foremost it goes to show how completely the geopolitical landscape has been transformed since the Cold War, and therefore how unlikely it is to see a replay of the same dynamics in Asia. Very striking too is how Prabowo singles out China's defense of Palestinians as a source of pride "for us all" - quite a statement from the leader of the world's largest Muslim nation. And an illustration of the US's complete failure at creating a rift between the Muslim world and China with the Xinjiang narrative. In fact it illustrates that the rift is very much between the Muslim world - as well as the Global South in general - and the West. China is increasingly seen as the moral leader on issues that matter, the "defender of the oppressed", when the West is seen as the imperialist oppressor.

Arnaud Bertrand

189,483 次观看 • 1 年前

🔴India's Strategic Reply to China's Indus Water Threat - The Malacca Strait Could Become Beijing's Biggest Nightmare 🇨🇳🇵🇰 China depends on the Strait of Malacca for nearly 70% of its maritime trade and the majority of its oil imports from the Middle East and Africa. This reliance is often referred to as Beijing's "Malacca Dilemma." As concerns grow over China's upstream control of Tibetan rivers, strategic analysts argue that India's strong naval presence in the Indian Ocean—along with partnerships with countries such as Indonesia, which sits at one entrance to the strait—provides a significant strategic counterbalance. While any attempt to disrupt shipping through the Malacca Strait would represent a major military escalation with global economic consequences, the chokepoint remains one of China's most critical maritime vulnerabilities and an important element in Indo-Pacific strategic planning.

🔴India's Strategic Reply to China's Indus Water Threat - The Malacca Strait Could Become Beijing's Biggest Nightmare 🇨🇳🇵🇰 China depends on the Strait of Malacca for nearly 70% of its maritime trade and the majority of its oil imports from the Middle East and Africa. This reliance is often referred to as Beijing's "Malacca Dilemma." As concerns grow over China's upstream control of Tibetan rivers, strategic analysts argue that India's strong naval presence in the Indian Ocean—along with partnerships with countries such as Indonesia, which sits at one entrance to the strait—provides a significant strategic counterbalance. While any attempt to disrupt shipping through the Malacca Strait would represent a major military escalation with global economic consequences, the chokepoint remains one of China's most critical maritime vulnerabilities and an important element in Indo-Pacific strategic planning.

Resonant News🌍

65,808 次观看 • 23 天前