Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Chris Bowen – Australia has ZERO nuclear fallback! Renewables alone can't cut it. Honeywell CEO Vimal Kapur at Davos: data centres, steel, cement & heavy industry run on ENERGY DENSITY. Not headlines or green goals, PHYSICS. Solar won't smelt steel. Wind won't make concrete. Coal, gas & nuclear are... show more

katy 🌸

79,403 subscribers

17,314 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NOW - Honeywell CEO says solar power cannot produce cement or steel, "They are very energy-intensive... It's physics... Renewables remain in the mix, but it cannot bring the amount of joules we need to produce this infrastructure which is required in the world."

NOW - Honeywell CEO says solar power cannot produce cement or steel, "They are very energy-intensive... It's physics... Renewables remain in the mix, but it cannot bring the amount of joules we need to produce this infrastructure which is required in the world."

Disclose.tv

1,591,763 views • 5 months ago

The development of AI, digital assets, & new tech has created a serious baseload power problem in America. ☀️Solar won't fix-it 🌬️Wind won't fix-it ⚛️Nuclear CAN FIX-IT Nuclear power is safe, efficient, green, & the cleanest energy at our disposal. It's time to adopt nuclear.

The development of AI, digital assets, & new tech has created a serious baseload power problem in America. ☀️Solar won't fix-it 🌬️Wind won't fix-it ⚛️Nuclear CAN FIX-IT Nuclear power is safe, efficient, green, & the cleanest energy at our disposal. It's time to adopt nuclear.

Byron Donalds

41,093 views • 1 year ago

91% of the energy powering the East Coast right now comes from nuclear, coal, and natural gas. Where are wind and solar when they are actually needed? “Green” energy disappears when demand peaks and heat hits hardest.

91% of the energy powering the East Coast right now comes from nuclear, coal, and natural gas. Where are wind and solar when they are actually needed? “Green” energy disappears when demand peaks and heat hits hardest.

Daniel Turner

25,616 views • 5 days ago

Get a load of the absolute tripe Chris Bowen has dropped on Bluesky. He forgets we sit on an abundance of coal, gas and oil here in Australia. We should be energy independent, not dependent on wind. Renewables don't work. Utterly hopeless.

Get a load of the absolute tripe Chris Bowen has dropped on Bluesky. He forgets we sit on an abundance of coal, gas and oil here in Australia. We should be energy independent, not dependent on wind. Renewables don't work. Utterly hopeless.

Matthew Camenzuli

49,598 views • 3 months ago

Germany built one of the largest wind and solar fleets on Earth. It dismantled its nuclear power stations and retired its coal, with the promise that green energy would power its future. The country spent billions transitioning. Then winter arrived, and Dunkelflaut hit - the dark windless dead zone. Wind and solar fell to barely 5% of demand. The grid staggered, and Germany was forced to fire up old coal plants it said had closed forever, and import expensive nuclear from France. This is the physics politicians fail to mention, and a point many people still fail to grasp. When the wind dies and the sun sets, renewables disappear. And the only way the grid survives, the only reason countless millions don't freeze to death, is thanks to oil, coal, nuclear and gas.

Germany built one of the largest wind and solar fleets on Earth. It dismantled its nuclear power stations and retired its coal, with the promise that green energy would power its future. The country spent billions transitioning. Then winter arrived, and Dunkelflaut hit - the dark windless dead zone. Wind and solar fell to barely 5% of demand. The grid staggered, and Germany was forced to fire up old coal plants it said had closed forever, and import expensive nuclear from France. This is the physics politicians fail to mention, and a point many people still fail to grasp. When the wind dies and the sun sets, renewables disappear. And the only way the grid survives, the only reason countless millions don't freeze to death, is thanks to oil, coal, nuclear and gas.

Electroverse

252,634 views • 5 months ago

Green Energy insider Lewis Horne drops dirty secrets on industry funding in the Renewables Sector in Australia. It’s a big club… and Aussies are paying through the nose for it! Time to end the scam. Dump Net Zero.

Green Energy insider Lewis Horne drops dirty secrets on industry funding in the Renewables Sector in Australia. It’s a big club… and Aussies are paying through the nose for it! Time to end the scam. Dump Net Zero.

Australian Lobby Group

11,054 views • 5 months ago

New Zealand PM Chris Luxon rejects outright the suggestion that his govt might use nuclear power. Instead, Mr Luxon wants to double the supply of “renewables”. He says nuclear would be unsuitable because of NZ’s earthquake problem. However the threat of earthquakes in Japan is pretty similar to NZ and they are expanding their nuclear energy resources. In 2023, nuclear power accounted for approximately 8.5% of Japan's electricity supply. They intend to increase this to 20-22% by 2030. Partly to reduce CO2 emissions in line with Japan’s Net Zero obligations. So why is it OK for Japan but not New Zealand? IMHO the renewables obsessed Mr Luxon and the gormless CEOs running our mainly govt owned energy generation/ transmission companies are going to send NZ industry to the wall. Leaving aside the effect constantly rising electricity prices have on the man in the street. Through grocery prices and other everyday purchases. If we leave coal, hydro, gas and geothermal aside for the sake of the argument, nuclear may or not be a viable energy option for NZ. However it can’t be any worse than the fools errand we are presently on with wind and solar.

New Zealand PM Chris Luxon rejects outright the suggestion that his govt might use nuclear power. Instead, Mr Luxon wants to double the supply of “renewables”. He says nuclear would be unsuitable because of NZ’s earthquake problem. However the threat of earthquakes in Japan is pretty similar to NZ and they are expanding their nuclear energy resources. In 2023, nuclear power accounted for approximately 8.5% of Japan's electricity supply. They intend to increase this to 20-22% by 2030. Partly to reduce CO2 emissions in line with Japan’s Net Zero obligations. So why is it OK for Japan but not New Zealand? IMHO the renewables obsessed Mr Luxon and the gormless CEOs running our mainly govt owned energy generation/ transmission companies are going to send NZ industry to the wall. Leaving aside the effect constantly rising electricity prices have on the man in the street. Through grocery prices and other everyday purchases. If we leave coal, hydro, gas and geothermal aside for the sake of the argument, nuclear may or not be a viable energy option for NZ. However it can’t be any worse than the fools errand we are presently on with wind and solar.

The Redbaiter

15,329 views • 10 months ago

These are the options. #fossilfuel #renewables #nuclear #solar #WindPower #gas

These are the options. #fossilfuel #renewables #nuclear #solar #WindPower #gas

Wil Stracke

28,057 views • 2 years ago

Solar and wind are sold as cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear using a number called LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy). But LCOE is a junk metric. It pretends that one-megawatt-hour of intermittent power is the same as one-megawatt-hour of reliable power. It isn't. When the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow, you still need electricity. So backup plants (coal, gas or nuclear) must run in the background, ready to fire instantly. LCOE fails to count that cost. It also ignores the miles of transmission lines for remote wind farms, the giant storage systems to cover lulls, the stabilizers to keep frequency steady, and the massive overbuild needed just to survive bad weather weeks.These hidden costs explode as wind and solar take over more of the grid. On paper, LCOE makes these renewables look cheap. In reality, they drive up costs system-wide. That's why nations with the most wind and solar have the highest electricity prices. LCOE isn't just misleading, it's a lie.

Solar and wind are sold as cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear using a number called LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy). But LCOE is a junk metric. It pretends that one-megawatt-hour of intermittent power is the same as one-megawatt-hour of reliable power. It isn't. When the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow, you still need electricity. So backup plants (coal, gas or nuclear) must run in the background, ready to fire instantly. LCOE fails to count that cost. It also ignores the miles of transmission lines for remote wind farms, the giant storage systems to cover lulls, the stabilizers to keep frequency steady, and the massive overbuild needed just to survive bad weather weeks.These hidden costs explode as wind and solar take over more of the grid. On paper, LCOE makes these renewables look cheap. In reality, they drive up costs system-wide. That's why nations with the most wind and solar have the highest electricity prices. LCOE isn't just misleading, it's a lie.

Electroverse

13,404 views • 4 months ago

.Secretary Chris Wright joined trailblazers of the nuclear energy industry to celebrate President Trump's success in launching the golden era of nuclear energy.

.Secretary Chris Wright joined trailblazers of the nuclear energy industry to celebrate President Trump's success in launching the golden era of nuclear energy.

U.S. Department of Energy

38,722 views • 13 days ago

“We need to drill for everything we have…get behind the renewables industry… and we need to back new nuclear” Scottish Conservative Russell Findlay says energy security is “absolutely critical”, questioning the SNP’s stance on the oil and gas industry #bbcqt

“We need to drill for everything we have…get behind the renewables industry… and we need to back new nuclear” Scottish Conservative Russell Findlay says energy security is “absolutely critical”, questioning the SNP’s stance on the oil and gas industry #bbcqt

BBC Question Time

19,809 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

208,235 views • 10 months ago

[ENERGY REALITIES] ‘The world has spent $10 trillion on Climate Change, but has achieved only 2.6% solar and wind as percentage of global (total) energy.. Let’s just engage with REALITY. The world runs on oil, coal and gas. Full Stop.’ - Chris Wright - US Energy Secretary

[ENERGY REALITIES] ‘The world has spent $10 trillion on Climate Change, but has achieved only 2.6% solar and wind as percentage of global (total) energy.. Let’s just engage with REALITY. The world runs on oil, coal and gas. Full Stop.’ - Chris Wright - US Energy Secretary

Jacob Maroga

14,757 views • 3 months ago

HE’S LYING Notwithstanding solar and wind are not "clean energy", it’s an outright lie to claim there is a "global shift to clean energy". The data is clear - there is no "global shift" Globally the world is using more coal, more gas, more oil and more nuclear. It’s also using more solar and more wind and more of everything else - but globally solar and wind are not REPLACING fossil fuels - they are merely ADDITIONAL. Further, Australia is the only nation in world attempting to replace its fossil fuels with prominently intermittent weather dependent sources of energy - solar and wind. No other nation is doing it, because it’s uneconomic and will only impoverish a nation if foolishly attempted. Blackout Bowen’s lies must be called out, because they are going to destroy Australia.

HE’S LYING Notwithstanding solar and wind are not "clean energy", it’s an outright lie to claim there is a "global shift to clean energy". The data is clear - there is no "global shift" Globally the world is using more coal, more gas, more oil and more nuclear. It’s also using more solar and more wind and more of everything else - but globally solar and wind are not REPLACING fossil fuels - they are merely ADDITIONAL. Further, Australia is the only nation in world attempting to replace its fossil fuels with prominently intermittent weather dependent sources of energy - solar and wind. No other nation is doing it, because it’s uneconomic and will only impoverish a nation if foolishly attempted. Blackout Bowen’s lies must be called out, because they are going to destroy Australia.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

20,689 views • 9 months ago

I’m for an all of the above energy plan—oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, renewables—all of it. If it keeps the power on and costs low, count me in.

I’m for an all of the above energy plan—oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, renewables—all of it. If it keeps the power on and costs low, count me in.

Winsome Earle-Sears

57,978 views • 9 months ago

🚨Secretary Chris Wright on President Donald J. Trump’ American Nuclear Renaissance: "President Trump came in with aggressive goals and an aggressive plan, a thoughtful plan, to restart the American nuclear industry!”

🚨Secretary Chris Wright on President Donald J. Trump’ American Nuclear Renaissance: "President Trump came in with aggressive goals and an aggressive plan, a thoughtful plan, to restart the American nuclear industry!”

U.S. Department of Energy

23,221 views • 16 days ago