Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Chris Langan: IQ 210, Einstein’s 160. Highest In USA? Simulation Hypothesis, Genocide, Reality, Quantum Computing. Full Ep: CTMU Radio | CTMU Chris Langan: IQ around 210, one of the highest, if not the highest, in the world. . Author of the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU). The...

MscsMedia's profile picture

Mscs Media

19,262 subscribers

965,903 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiHaberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Michael Knowles asks Christopher Langan, often called the "smartest man alive" (IQ estimates 195–210, creator of the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe or CTMU): "Does God exist?" Langan: "Yes." Knowles smiles at the elegance: Reality itself has an identity—it's "that which exists." Naming "reality" is identifying something fundamental. Langan ties it directly: This identity matches the biblical "I AM THAT I AM" from the burning bush—God as identity itself, Being itself. Through CTMU's mathematical framework, he deduces properties of this ultimate identity (self-configuring, self-processing reality) that align with attributes of God in major religions: omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, sentience. It's not blind faith—it's a logical deduction from the nature of existence. In a world of endless debates, this high-IQ take cuts straight: Denying God is like denying reality has coherent identity. Mind-bending or profound? Where do you stand on reality's ultimate "I AM"?
0:59

Michael Knowles asks Christopher Langan, often called the "smartest man alive" (IQ estimates 195–210, creator of the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe or CTMU): "Does God exist?" Langan: "Yes." Knowles smiles at the elegance: Reality itself has an identity—it's "that which exists." Naming "reality" is identifying something fundamental. Langan ties it directly: This identity matches the biblical "I AM THAT I AM" from the burning bush—God as identity itself, Being itself. Through CTMU's mathematical framework, he deduces properties of this ultimate identity (self-configuring, self-processing reality) that align with attributes of God in major religions: omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, sentience. It's not blind faith—it's a logical deduction from the nature of existence. In a world of endless debates, this high-IQ take cuts straight: Denying God is like denying reality has coherent identity. Mind-bending or profound? Where do you stand on reality's ultimate "I AM"?

Camus

510,613 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Guinness Book of World Records listed her as "Highest IQ" with a 228 IQ Marilyn was in the spotlight: • Cover of major magazines such as the New York and the Parade Magazines. • Appeared on Late Night with David Letterman. She couldn't imagine what would come after...
1:12

The Guinness Book of World Records listed her as "Highest IQ" with a 228 IQ Marilyn was in the spotlight: • Cover of major magazines such as the New York and the Parade Magazines. • Appeared on Late Night with David Letterman. She couldn't imagine what would come after...

Luis Malheiro

1,945,933 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?
1:39

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?

Interstellar

37,987 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The mode of existence of the world can be understood as the set of its fundamental characteristics that make both its existence and its transformations possible. In other words, what basic properties must a world possess for its evolutionary existence to be possible at all? Among the key aspects, several can be identified: (a) physical space must be either finite or infinite; (b) if infinite, this infinity must be either spherical or linear; (c) physical reality must possess the capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena — which, according to our observations, it indeed does; (d) this capacity, as an active self-organizing property, must either have a beginning or be beginningless — that is, it either existed eternally, or the world was originally maximally simple and static before this property spontaneously emerged. : The author proposes that the mode of existence of the world is defined by a set of fundamental characteristics that make both its persistence and its transformations possible. In other words, for any reality capable of evolutionary development to arise, certain basic properties must be present. Physical space must be either finite or infinite. If infinite, its geometry must be either spherical or linear. Physical reality must possess the inherent capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena, as we observe in our own universe. Finally, this self-organizing property must either have existed eternally or have emerged spontaneously at a certain moment from an originally simple and static state. This framework invites us to consider the minimal conditions required for a universe like ours to evolve intelligence and complexity. It frames the question of cosmic origins not as a mystery of creation from nothing, but as an inquiry into the necessary and sufficient properties of matter and space that allow reality to unfold as it has.
0:57

The mode of existence of the world can be understood as the set of its fundamental characteristics that make both its existence and its transformations possible. In other words, what basic properties must a world possess for its evolutionary existence to be possible at all? Among the key aspects, several can be identified: (a) physical space must be either finite or infinite; (b) if infinite, this infinity must be either spherical or linear; (c) physical reality must possess the capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena — which, according to our observations, it indeed does; (d) this capacity, as an active self-organizing property, must either have a beginning or be beginningless — that is, it either existed eternally, or the world was originally maximally simple and static before this property spontaneously emerged. : The author proposes that the mode of existence of the world is defined by a set of fundamental characteristics that make both its persistence and its transformations possible. In other words, for any reality capable of evolutionary development to arise, certain basic properties must be present. Physical space must be either finite or infinite. If infinite, its geometry must be either spherical or linear. Physical reality must possess the inherent capacity to generate vast, stable structures and highly complex phenomena, as we observe in our own universe. Finally, this self-organizing property must either have existed eternally or have emerged spontaneously at a certain moment from an originally simple and static state. This framework invites us to consider the minimal conditions required for a universe like ours to evolve intelligence and complexity. It frames the question of cosmic origins not as a mystery of creation from nothing, but as an inquiry into the necessary and sufficient properties of matter and space that allow reality to unfold as it has.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

1,851,902 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

ELON: TESLA’S ROBOTS ARE MOVING FROM SIMULATIONS TO REALITY “For the robot, we’re going to need to build a lot of them and put them in an Optimus Academy so they can do self-play in reality and test different tasks. Tesla has quite a good, physics accurate, reality-generator, and we’re doing that for the robots. So you can do millions of robots in a simulated world, and then 10k in the real world to close the simulation to reality gap. Grok would orchestrate the behavior of the Optimus robots.” Source: Cheeky Pint Podcast, Elon Musk
1:39

ELON: TESLA’S ROBOTS ARE MOVING FROM SIMULATIONS TO REALITY “For the robot, we’re going to need to build a lot of them and put them in an Optimus Academy so they can do self-play in reality and test different tasks. Tesla has quite a good, physics accurate, reality-generator, and we’re doing that for the robots. So you can do millions of robots in a simulated world, and then 10k in the real world to close the simulation to reality gap. Grok would orchestrate the behavior of the Optimus robots.” Source: Cheeky Pint Podcast, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

19,289 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Why quantum theory could have a fractal structure: explained in 83 minutes. The notion of true quantum nonlocality is absurd. In the latest episode of the Quantum Foundations Podcast, Prof Tim Palmer from the University of Oxford suggests that there is a hidden assumption in standard quantum mechanics, and dropping it will save us from this absurdity. Namely, the reality of counterfactuals: the physics of what could have happened but did not. Inspired by chaos theory and the fractal structure widespread in atmospheric physics, Palmer has developed a new underlying structure for quantum theory, with radical implications for our fundamental principles of quantum physics; the limits of quantum computation; and perhaps even the search for quantum gravity. Watch on my YouTube channel, or listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts!
1:34

Why quantum theory could have a fractal structure: explained in 83 minutes. The notion of true quantum nonlocality is absurd. In the latest episode of the Quantum Foundations Podcast, Prof Tim Palmer from the University of Oxford suggests that there is a hidden assumption in standard quantum mechanics, and dropping it will save us from this absurdity. Namely, the reality of counterfactuals: the physics of what could have happened but did not. Inspired by chaos theory and the fractal structure widespread in atmospheric physics, Palmer has developed a new underlying structure for quantum theory, with radical implications for our fundamental principles of quantum physics; the limits of quantum computation; and perhaps even the search for quantum gravity. Watch on my YouTube channel, or listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts!

Dr Maria Violaris

18,259 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The existential war for survival in which the 8% of the globe that is first-world peoples faces racial enslavement and genocide at the hands of the 92% of the world that is third-world can properly be thought of as the IQ WAR. The 8% first-world consists of HIGH IQ peoples--average IQ 100 or better. That high IQ is WHY first-world cultures create EVERYTHING of value in this world, everything that makes a first-world standard of living possible--and always will, at least until eradicated. The 92% of the world that is third-world possesses average IQs in the 80s (Central and South America), the 70s (Middle East and India), and even the 60s and 50s (sub-Saharan Africa). These third-world peoples, precisely because of their limited IQ relative to the first-world, are literally INCAPABLE of achieving what first-world peoples achieve routinely, AND THEY HATE US FOR THIS LIVING HUMILIATION. So the low-IQ third-world peoples of the planet have determined to loot, enslave, and ultimately eradicate the high-IQ first-world. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. SEE FULL SHOW HERE:
2:15

The existential war for survival in which the 8% of the globe that is first-world peoples faces racial enslavement and genocide at the hands of the 92% of the world that is third-world can properly be thought of as the IQ WAR. The 8% first-world consists of HIGH IQ peoples--average IQ 100 or better. That high IQ is WHY first-world cultures create EVERYTHING of value in this world, everything that makes a first-world standard of living possible--and always will, at least until eradicated. The 92% of the world that is third-world possesses average IQs in the 80s (Central and South America), the 70s (Middle East and India), and even the 60s and 50s (sub-Saharan Africa). These third-world peoples, precisely because of their limited IQ relative to the first-world, are literally INCAPABLE of achieving what first-world peoples achieve routinely, AND THEY HATE US FOR THIS LIVING HUMILIATION. So the low-IQ third-world peoples of the planet have determined to loot, enslave, and ultimately eradicate the high-IQ first-world. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. SEE FULL SHOW HERE:

Andrew Branca Show

45,380 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 Chris Bledsoe “We are going to learn that God is Real” 😱 “Consciousness is a new age word for God” “We live in some kind of simulation” Chris Bledsoe dropped some truth bombs here on the Astral Recall Podcast! 👽🛸 Chris talked about the darkness we are currently staring in the face & how things will change as we move into the age of Aquarius - A new knowledge! Chris Bledsoe had his original UFO encounter in 2007 on the Cape fear River. Here later got visited by the ethereal being known as ‘The Lady’. Chris Bledsoe is the most studied UFO experiencer in the history of the phenomena. He has been studied by NASA, CIA, DIA & probably every other three letter agency. The next two years could be the most revealing with Chris Bledsoe playing a huge part in the disclosure of the true nature of reality. #ChrisBledsoe #UFO
1:46

🚨 Chris Bledsoe “We are going to learn that God is Real” 😱 “Consciousness is a new age word for God” “We live in some kind of simulation” Chris Bledsoe dropped some truth bombs here on the Astral Recall Podcast! 👽🛸 Chris talked about the darkness we are currently staring in the face & how things will change as we move into the age of Aquarius - A new knowledge! Chris Bledsoe had his original UFO encounter in 2007 on the Cape fear River. Here later got visited by the ethereal being known as ‘The Lady’. Chris Bledsoe is the most studied UFO experiencer in the history of the phenomena. He has been studied by NASA, CIA, DIA & probably every other three letter agency. The next two years could be the most revealing with Chris Bledsoe playing a huge part in the disclosure of the true nature of reality. #ChrisBledsoe #UFO

Interstellar

50,091 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Marc Andreessen says raw intelligence might be the worst qualification for leadership — and it changes everything about how we should think about AI. "If the leader is more than one standard deviation of IQ away from the followers, it's a real problem." Andreessen points to the US military, one of the earliest and most rigorous adopters of IQ testing, as the source of this insight. They slot people into specialties and leadership roles based on IQ scores. And over the years, they kept seeing the same pattern. A leader who is significantly less intelligent than their people struggles to model how those people think. That part is intuitive. But the reverse turns out to be equally true. "It's actually very hard for very smart people to model the internal thought processes of even moderately smart people." A leader who is two standard deviations above the norm of the organisation they're running also loses theory of mind, that ability to hold an accurate model of what's happening inside someone else's head. The gap is too wide in both directions. Andreessen then takes this to its logical conclusion: "If you had a person or a machine that had a thousand IQ or something like it, its understanding of reality would be so alien to the people or the things that it was managing that it wouldn't even be able to connect in any sort of realistic way." An AI that vastly outthinks every human in the room isn't positioned to lead those humans. It's positioned to be completely incomprehensible to them. Leadership has never really been an intelligence problem. It's a connection problem. And no amount of raw intelligence closes that gap — past a certain point, it only widens it. The world will not be run by the smartest thing in the room for a long time. Maybe ever.
1:27

Marc Andreessen says raw intelligence might be the worst qualification for leadership — and it changes everything about how we should think about AI. "If the leader is more than one standard deviation of IQ away from the followers, it's a real problem." Andreessen points to the US military, one of the earliest and most rigorous adopters of IQ testing, as the source of this insight. They slot people into specialties and leadership roles based on IQ scores. And over the years, they kept seeing the same pattern. A leader who is significantly less intelligent than their people struggles to model how those people think. That part is intuitive. But the reverse turns out to be equally true. "It's actually very hard for very smart people to model the internal thought processes of even moderately smart people." A leader who is two standard deviations above the norm of the organisation they're running also loses theory of mind, that ability to hold an accurate model of what's happening inside someone else's head. The gap is too wide in both directions. Andreessen then takes this to its logical conclusion: "If you had a person or a machine that had a thousand IQ or something like it, its understanding of reality would be so alien to the people or the things that it was managing that it wouldn't even be able to connect in any sort of realistic way." An AI that vastly outthinks every human in the room isn't positioned to lead those humans. It's positioned to be completely incomprehensible to them. Leadership has never really been an intelligence problem. It's a connection problem. And no amount of raw intelligence closes that gap — past a certain point, it only widens it. The world will not be run by the smartest thing in the room for a long time. Maybe ever.

Big Brain AI

366,516 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

In this mind-blowing first part of our interview with physicist & consciousness researcher Thomas Campbell, author of My Big T.O.E. (Theory of Everything), we dive into the mysteries of virtual reality theory. Campbell reveals the quantum mechanic truths behind metaphysical phenomena like remote viewing, premonitions, telepathy, energetic healing and how we are all living in a simulation. Don’t miss Part One and stay tuned for Part Two, click the ▶️ 🧠💥#BialikBreakdown #mayimbialik #mentalhealthpodcast #podcast
1:28

In this mind-blowing first part of our interview with physicist & consciousness researcher Thomas Campbell, author of My Big T.O.E. (Theory of Everything), we dive into the mysteries of virtual reality theory. Campbell reveals the quantum mechanic truths behind metaphysical phenomena like remote viewing, premonitions, telepathy, energetic healing and how we are all living in a simulation. Don’t miss Part One and stay tuned for Part Two, click the ▶️ 🧠💥#BialikBreakdown #mayimbialik #mentalhealthpodcast #podcast

Mayim Bialik

33,364 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Donald Hoffman: : Reality Is An Interface, Illusion - Math Undeniable - Consciousness Creates Spacetime - Evolution Hid the Truth | Donald Hoffman | Mscs Media *327 Full Ep: Donald Hoffman, scientist, and professor, asks, do we see the world as it truly is? ⁠In ⁠The Case Against Reality⁠, pioneering cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman says no. We see what we need in order to survive. Our visual perceptions are not a window onto reality, Hoffman shows us, but instead are interfaces constructed by natural selection. Imagine we were all born with lenses, that put us in a video game, how would we know? The objects we see around us are not unlike the file icons on our computer desktops: while shaped like a small folder on our screens, the files themselves are made of a series of ones and zeros - too complex for most of us to understand. In a similar way, Hoffman argues, evolution has shaped our perceptions into simplistic illusions to help us navigate the world around us. Yet now these illusions can be manipulated by advertising and design. Follow Professor Hoffman: ⁠ ⁠ physics Drawing on thirty years of Hoffman's own influential research, as well as evolutionary biology, game theory, neuroscience, and philosophy, The Case Against Reality makes the mind-bending yet utterly convincing case that the world is nothing like what we see through our eyes. Donald Hoffman's books, and papers, are easy to read and understand. Books: ⁠The Case Against Reality⁠ ⁠Visual Intelligence⁠ ⁠Observer Mechanics⁠ ⁠Fusions of consciousness⁠, ⁠Fact, Fiction, and Fitness⁠, and ⁠Objects of consciousness⁠. Donald Hoffman Spotify Spotify Podcasts 🎙 #donalddhoffman #Spotify #Space #spacetime #podcast #Science #Physics #neuroscience #illusion #REALITY #Simulation #interface #CONSCIOUSNESS
11:01

Donald Hoffman: : Reality Is An Interface, Illusion - Math Undeniable - Consciousness Creates Spacetime - Evolution Hid the Truth | Donald Hoffman | Mscs Media *327 Full Ep: Donald Hoffman, scientist, and professor, asks, do we see the world as it truly is? ⁠In ⁠The Case Against Reality⁠, pioneering cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman says no. We see what we need in order to survive. Our visual perceptions are not a window onto reality, Hoffman shows us, but instead are interfaces constructed by natural selection. Imagine we were all born with lenses, that put us in a video game, how would we know? The objects we see around us are not unlike the file icons on our computer desktops: while shaped like a small folder on our screens, the files themselves are made of a series of ones and zeros - too complex for most of us to understand. In a similar way, Hoffman argues, evolution has shaped our perceptions into simplistic illusions to help us navigate the world around us. Yet now these illusions can be manipulated by advertising and design. Follow Professor Hoffman: ⁠ ⁠ physics Drawing on thirty years of Hoffman's own influential research, as well as evolutionary biology, game theory, neuroscience, and philosophy, The Case Against Reality makes the mind-bending yet utterly convincing case that the world is nothing like what we see through our eyes. Donald Hoffman's books, and papers, are easy to read and understand. Books: ⁠The Case Against Reality⁠ ⁠Visual Intelligence⁠ ⁠Observer Mechanics⁠ ⁠Fusions of consciousness⁠, ⁠Fact, Fiction, and Fitness⁠, and ⁠Objects of consciousness⁠. Donald Hoffman Spotify Spotify Podcasts 🎙 #donalddhoffman #Spotify #Space #spacetime #podcast #Science #Physics #neuroscience #illusion #REALITY #Simulation #interface #CONSCIOUSNESS

Mscs Media

3,482,416 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🚨BREAKING: A cognitive scientist from MIT has mathematically proven that evolution guarantees we see zero percent of true reality, that most consciousness in the universe exists without a body, and that non-human intelligences with a wider window on reality than ours can reach in and manipulate it the way a programmer manipulates a video game. Donald Hoffman (Donald Hoffman) is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine who has spent 40 years building a mathematical theory of the observer. His work was cited by John Wheeler in the "It From Bit" paper. He studied under Marvin Minsky at MIT, spent two decades secretly meeting with Francis Crick to study consciousness, and has nine specific mathematical conjectures on the table that would derive general relativity, quantum field theory and the Big Bang from a single framework. The top high-energy physicists in the world, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Nobel laureate David Gross, are already saying spacetime is doomed. Hoffman thinks he knows what replaces it. This interview is the first time he has publicly laid out what his mathematical model explains about alien life, embodiment and the structure of reality. It already derives time dilation and quantum wave functions directly from differences in observer window size. Physics has spent a century failing to solve the measurement problem because it has been looking in the wrong place. The observer has to come first, and no physicalist framework can get you there. A consciousness with a larger observer window has access to the underlying structure of our reality in ways we can't perceive or counter. A craft going Mach 40 instantaneously in our headset could be a leisurely maneuver in theirs. The implications for UAP and alien life are immense. Embodiment, being locked into a body with fingers and toes as your only interface with the world, is a probability zero anomaly in the full space of possible minds. He also says current large language models are dumber than cucumbers. His new framework, the recursive trace logic, is a completely different architecture, and some of the biggest names in frontier AI have already come to him about it. The framework has no ceiling, and the implication is a single unified consciousness exploring itself through an unbounded number of perspectives, each one capable of waking up. Death, in this framework, is just the closing of an icon on the desktop. Full conversation is live now.
1:44

🚨BREAKING: A cognitive scientist from MIT has mathematically proven that evolution guarantees we see zero percent of true reality, that most consciousness in the universe exists without a body, and that non-human intelligences with a wider window on reality than ours can reach in and manipulate it the way a programmer manipulates a video game. Donald Hoffman (Donald Hoffman) is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine who has spent 40 years building a mathematical theory of the observer. His work was cited by John Wheeler in the "It From Bit" paper. He studied under Marvin Minsky at MIT, spent two decades secretly meeting with Francis Crick to study consciousness, and has nine specific mathematical conjectures on the table that would derive general relativity, quantum field theory and the Big Bang from a single framework. The top high-energy physicists in the world, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Nobel laureate David Gross, are already saying spacetime is doomed. Hoffman thinks he knows what replaces it. This interview is the first time he has publicly laid out what his mathematical model explains about alien life, embodiment and the structure of reality. It already derives time dilation and quantum wave functions directly from differences in observer window size. Physics has spent a century failing to solve the measurement problem because it has been looking in the wrong place. The observer has to come first, and no physicalist framework can get you there. A consciousness with a larger observer window has access to the underlying structure of our reality in ways we can't perceive or counter. A craft going Mach 40 instantaneously in our headset could be a leisurely maneuver in theirs. The implications for UAP and alien life are immense. Embodiment, being locked into a body with fingers and toes as your only interface with the world, is a probability zero anomaly in the full space of possible minds. He also says current large language models are dumber than cucumbers. His new framework, the recursive trace logic, is a completely different architecture, and some of the biggest names in frontier AI have already come to him about it. The framework has no ceiling, and the implication is a single unified consciousness exploring itself through an unbounded number of perspectives, each one capable of waking up. Death, in this framework, is just the closing of an icon on the desktop. Full conversation is live now.

Jesse Michels

1,668,621 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BANNON: Chris Krebs should be in prison for the rest of his life! Tulsi just dropped documents showing that in January and February of 2020, the highest levels of the intelligence community, DHS, DOJ, and law enforcement KNEW the election system was hackable. The Chinese Communist Party HACKED IT, and they took a united front! Didn't tell the states. Didn't tell the public. Krebs ran right to 60 minutes and called it the "most secure election in history!"
1:00

BANNON: Chris Krebs should be in prison for the rest of his life! Tulsi just dropped documents showing that in January and February of 2020, the highest levels of the intelligence community, DHS, DOJ, and law enforcement KNEW the election system was hackable. The Chinese Communist Party HACKED IT, and they took a united front! Didn't tell the states. Didn't tell the public. Krebs ran right to 60 minutes and called it the "most secure election in history!"

Bannon’s WarRoom

26,484 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.
0:38

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

529,789 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk in new interview on how Tesla’s Optimus robot will learn more quickly: "What we're going to need to do is build a lot of robots and put them in a kind of like a "Optimus Academy" so they can do self-play in reality. We're actually building that out. We're gonna have at least 10,000 Optimus robots, maybe 20,000 or 30,000, that are doing self-play and testing different tasks. Tesla has quite a good reality generator. A physics-accurate reality generator that we made for the cars. We'll do the same things for the robots, and actually have done that for the robots. You can do millions of simulated robots in a simulated world, and you use the tens of thousands in the real world to close the simulation to reality gap.”
0:59

Elon Musk in new interview on how Tesla’s Optimus robot will learn more quickly: "What we're going to need to do is build a lot of robots and put them in a kind of like a "Optimus Academy" so they can do self-play in reality. We're actually building that out. We're gonna have at least 10,000 Optimus robots, maybe 20,000 or 30,000, that are doing self-play and testing different tasks. Tesla has quite a good reality generator. A physics-accurate reality generator that we made for the cars. We'll do the same things for the robots, and actually have done that for the robots. You can do millions of simulated robots in a simulated world, and you use the tens of thousands in the real world to close the simulation to reality gap.”

Sawyer Merritt

250,956 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

When Jünger says that the Worker, the technicist, has triumphed, he is not, as is well known, referring to an ordinary laborer or to any particular social class. The Worker has a metaphysical dimension. His triumph takes place through a new order, a planning of the world through total technical mobilization. It is a victory that leads to the establishment of a domain in which nothing remains external to work, technology and efficiency. It is therefore a new ontological configuration of reality.
1:43

When Jünger says that the Worker, the technicist, has triumphed, he is not, as is well known, referring to an ordinary laborer or to any particular social class. The Worker has a metaphysical dimension. His triumph takes place through a new order, a planning of the world through total technical mobilization. It is a victory that leads to the establishment of a domain in which nothing remains external to work, technology and efficiency. It is therefore a new ontological configuration of reality.

Guilherme Gomes Santos

17,078 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

Facts about the country Somalia - 49% of the population is inbred - The average national IQ. 67. The IQ required to be considered mentally disabled in the United States of America is 70 - Over 98% of Somali girls undergo FGM (female genital mutilation) - Somalia has the world’s highest maternal mortality rate - Piracy is Somalia’s main source of income - Somalia has no functioning central government and hasn’t had one since 1991 - They've been engaged in civil war for the last 4 decades, 40 years and still going on today - Somalia is the most corrupt country on earth (Almost always ranked in top 3) - More than 70% of the Somali economy runs on remittances from the diaspora - Minnesota has the largest Somali population outside Somalia - Somalia has the highest birth rate in the world (6.9–7.4 children per woman) - Somalia has never won a single Olympic medal in its entire history - They are home to one of the world's largest terrorist organizations, Al-Shabaab, which by the way - The largest funder of that terrorist organization Al-Shabaab is the Minnesota taxpayer - Charcoal smuggling to the Gulf states is one of al-Shabaab’s top revenue sources
1:17

Facts about the country Somalia - 49% of the population is inbred - The average national IQ. 67. The IQ required to be considered mentally disabled in the United States of America is 70 - Over 98% of Somali girls undergo FGM (female genital mutilation) - Somalia has the world’s highest maternal mortality rate - Piracy is Somalia’s main source of income - Somalia has no functioning central government and hasn’t had one since 1991 - They've been engaged in civil war for the last 4 decades, 40 years and still going on today - Somalia is the most corrupt country on earth (Almost always ranked in top 3) - More than 70% of the Somali economy runs on remittances from the diaspora - Minnesota has the largest Somali population outside Somalia - Somalia has the highest birth rate in the world (6.9–7.4 children per woman) - Somalia has never won a single Olympic medal in its entire history - They are home to one of the world's largest terrorist organizations, Al-Shabaab, which by the way - The largest funder of that terrorist organization Al-Shabaab is the Minnesota taxpayer - Charcoal smuggling to the Gulf states is one of al-Shabaab’s top revenue sources

Wall Street Apes

671,893 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Israel has granted a perpetrator of war crimes in Gaza the honor of lighting a ceremonial torch on Independence Day. By choosing Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv to represent “the spirit of the nation,” Israel is making genocide part of its official national ethos. “There’s nothing for them to go back to in Rafah and Jabalya… Tens of thousands of families have no documents, childhood photos, ID cards, homes. Nothing.” This boast was made by Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, an Israeli Rabbi who perpetrated war crimes who has been chosen to light a torch at Israel’s Independence Day ceremony, today, April 21. This is one of the highest accolades in the country, granted to “exemplary citizens” who represent “the spirit of the nation.” Rabbi Zarbiv served about 500 days as a military reservist in Gaza over the last two and a half years. As a bulldozer operator during the genocide, he carried out war crimes of which he has openly boasted in videos he filmed, media interviews and public talks. Bestowing one of the highest civilian honors in Israel on a citizen who committed war crimes illustrates how deeply the dehumanization of Palestinians has taken root in the Israeli mainstream. It is yet another terrifying signal that genocide has officially become part of the national ethos. Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv is a regional rabbinical court judge for the settlement of Ariel, and head the pre-military academy in the settlement of Beit El that educates hundreds of Israeli youth. Choosing him as an “exemplary citizen” represents a state-level endorsement of the complete de-humanization of Palestinians, systematic destruction of Palestinian life and the governing logic of annihilation and ethnic cleansing in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Zarbiv is not ashamed of his actions, neither, clearly is the State of Israel. We’vecompiled some documentation here to mark the occasion.
0:46

Israel has granted a perpetrator of war crimes in Gaza the honor of lighting a ceremonial torch on Independence Day. By choosing Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv to represent “the spirit of the nation,” Israel is making genocide part of its official national ethos. “There’s nothing for them to go back to in Rafah and Jabalya… Tens of thousands of families have no documents, childhood photos, ID cards, homes. Nothing.” This boast was made by Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, an Israeli Rabbi who perpetrated war crimes who has been chosen to light a torch at Israel’s Independence Day ceremony, today, April 21. This is one of the highest accolades in the country, granted to “exemplary citizens” who represent “the spirit of the nation.” Rabbi Zarbiv served about 500 days as a military reservist in Gaza over the last two and a half years. As a bulldozer operator during the genocide, he carried out war crimes of which he has openly boasted in videos he filmed, media interviews and public talks. Bestowing one of the highest civilian honors in Israel on a citizen who committed war crimes illustrates how deeply the dehumanization of Palestinians has taken root in the Israeli mainstream. It is yet another terrifying signal that genocide has officially become part of the national ethos. Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv is a regional rabbinical court judge for the settlement of Ariel, and head the pre-military academy in the settlement of Beit El that educates hundreds of Israeli youth. Choosing him as an “exemplary citizen” represents a state-level endorsement of the complete de-humanization of Palestinians, systematic destruction of Palestinian life and the governing logic of annihilation and ethnic cleansing in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Zarbiv is not ashamed of his actions, neither, clearly is the State of Israel. We’vecompiled some documentation here to mark the occasion.

B'Tselem בצלם بتسيلم

121,922 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce