Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

.Chris Mowrey STRUGGLES to understand why we would enforce our immigration laws, so Michael Knowles helps him understand: "It is a basic tenet of any political community that you get to determine who's in and who's out. If we do not enforce that most basic law, we would cease,... show more

Daily Wire

2,579,680 subscribers

36,466 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Chris Mowrey: “Wait, so you believe that the role of the federal government is —” Michael Knowles: “To enforce federal immigration law, yes, I do.” Chris Mowrey: “Even against the will of states?” Michael Knowles: “Yes, it's federal law, and there's a Supremacy Clause in our Constitution.” NUKED!

Chris Mowrey: “Wait, so you believe that the role of the federal government is —” Michael Knowles: “To enforce federal immigration law, yes, I do.” Chris Mowrey: “Even against the will of states?” Michael Knowles: “Yes, it's federal law, and there's a Supremacy Clause in our Constitution.” NUKED!

RedWave Press

184,935 views • 6 months ago

German Chancellor Merz: Even the most absurd political opinion must be allowed to be expressed in an open and free society. The limit for us is the Basic Law and human dignity. I have also said this to our American friends: you may see it differently, but we see it this way, and we will enforce it — even if you do not like it. For us, the limit is the Basic Law and human dignity.

German Chancellor Merz: Even the most absurd political opinion must be allowed to be expressed in an open and free society. The limit for us is the Basic Law and human dignity. I have also said this to our American friends: you may see it differently, but we see it this way, and we will enforce it — even if you do not like it. For us, the limit is the Basic Law and human dignity.

Clash Report

24,646 views • 6 months ago

"You have to consent to be part of our political environment -- and we have to consent to let you in. How is it so that if we do not consent to an illegal alien being here -- we have not given the membership into our political community -- that somehow they have a child and that child automatically gets our consent? We never consented to the parents being here, but we have to automatically accept the child?"

"You have to consent to be part of our political environment -- and we have to consent to let you in. How is it so that if we do not consent to an illegal alien being here -- we have not given the membership into our political community -- that somehow they have a child and that child automatically gets our consent? We never consented to the parents being here, but we have to automatically accept the child?"

Brianna Lyman

33,705 views • 5 months ago

“Equal justice under law” is not a political slogan — it is a fundamental tenet of our Constitutional Republic. When that tenet is shown to be weaker than we thought, we must have the bravery to fortify it.

“Equal justice under law” is not a political slogan — it is a fundamental tenet of our Constitutional Republic. When that tenet is shown to be weaker than we thought, we must have the bravery to fortify it.

Governor JB Pritzker

11,167 views • 2 months ago

What’s wrong with Starmer? Why is it so difficult for him to understand that Islam is not like other religions? Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity do not have a religious mandate to acquire political power and enforce their worldview on the entire society. Why is he so ignorant of the fact that Islamic public celebrations are not religious, but political activism?

What’s wrong with Starmer? Why is it so difficult for him to understand that Islam is not like other religions? Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity do not have a religious mandate to acquire political power and enforce their worldview on the entire society. Why is he so ignorant of the fact that Islamic public celebrations are not religious, but political activism?

Dan Burmawi

113,740 views • 5 months ago

Angela Ambitho: The samples that we have at any given time are between 1500 and 3000; hardly ever do we get to 5000. The frequency is perhaps once every quarter. The laws of probability would dictate that if you have 26 million Kenyans that you have to cover, you would have to do so many polls. That is why I am very happy and encouraging of our young people who are now interested in polling. That would increase the frequency in terms of the probability of you getting a chance to be interviewed #CitizenSundayLive

Angela Ambitho: The samples that we have at any given time are between 1500 and 3000; hardly ever do we get to 5000. The frequency is perhaps once every quarter. The laws of probability would dictate that if you have 26 million Kenyans that you have to cover, you would have to do so many polls. That is why I am very happy and encouraging of our young people who are now interested in polling. That would increase the frequency in terms of the probability of you getting a chance to be interviewed #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

14,148 views • 29 days ago

Israel is blocking humanitarian aid in clear violation of U.S. law, which prohibits military assistance to any country that restricts U.S. humanitarian aid. It’s time we enforce our laws and stop military assistance to Israel.

Israel is blocking humanitarian aid in clear violation of U.S. law, which prohibits military assistance to any country that restricts U.S. humanitarian aid. It’s time we enforce our laws and stop military assistance to Israel.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

380,786 views • 2 years ago

WATCH | SANDF Chief Rudzani Maphwanya says, "We are not going to tolerate any further escalation of any criminal activity that will take our people’s lives." He adds, "We will show those criminal elements that this is a state and ensure that we are going to enforce by any means the law of order."

WATCH | SANDF Chief Rudzani Maphwanya says, "We are not going to tolerate any further escalation of any criminal activity that will take our people’s lives." He adds, "We will show those criminal elements that this is a state and ensure that we are going to enforce by any means the law of order."

SABC News

125,217 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”

RedWave Press

126,818 views • 3 months ago

THIS IS IMPORTANT: The rumor about agents entering houses unconstitutionally is MISSING CONTEXT! Reporter: "Do you believe that you can forcibly enter with an administrative warrant, or would that be a violation of the Fourth Amendment?" Vance: "Well, our understanding is that you can enforce the immigration laws of the country under an administrative order if you have an administrative warrant. That's what we think. That's our understanding of the law. That's our best faith attempt to understand the law. Again, this is something courts will weigh in on. I won't speak to that. But yes, most immigration law in our country is not done through the criminal system with a judge. It's done through the administrative law system. We're gonna continue that practice, just as they did in the Biden administration or any other administration." EPIC SMACKDOWN!

THIS IS IMPORTANT: The rumor about agents entering houses unconstitutionally is MISSING CONTEXT! Reporter: "Do you believe that you can forcibly enter with an administrative warrant, or would that be a violation of the Fourth Amendment?" Vance: "Well, our understanding is that you can enforce the immigration laws of the country under an administrative order if you have an administrative warrant. That's what we think. That's our understanding of the law. That's our best faith attempt to understand the law. Again, this is something courts will weigh in on. I won't speak to that. But yes, most immigration law in our country is not done through the criminal system with a judge. It's done through the administrative law system. We're gonna continue that practice, just as they did in the Biden administration or any other administration." EPIC SMACKDOWN!

Gunther Eagleman™

91,201 views • 7 months ago

🔥 Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH-BOMB on CNN that's so simple, even Abby Phillip can understand it: "In America every single day, there are children that cry when their mom or dad — who's an American citizen — breaks the law, gets arrested, and goes to jail." "There's no rioting or looting over that, because we understand that we're either a country of laws, or we are NOT a country of laws." "We separate them from their families! Because we judge them on the law...! Why is it different for illegal immigrants?!"

🔥 Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH-BOMB on CNN that's so simple, even Abby Phillip can understand it: "In America every single day, there are children that cry when their mom or dad — who's an American citizen — breaks the law, gets arrested, and goes to jail." "There's no rioting or looting over that, because we understand that we're either a country of laws, or we are NOT a country of laws." "We separate them from their families! Because we judge them on the law...! Why is it different for illegal immigrants?!"

Townhall.com

864,660 views • 1 year ago

Historic speech by Madame Vaira Vike-Freiberga at NATO summit. We would like to build our future on the rock of political certainty, not on the shifting sands of indecision. We do not want to be in some sort of grey zone of political uncertainty, we would like to enjoy the full sunshine of the liberties and rights that NATO has been defending so long. We do not want to be left out in the outer darkness, and we would not wish it happen to any other nation who has expressed the desire to join those nations that hold the same values, that follow the same ideals, and that are ready for the same efforts and the same strivings.

Historic speech by Madame Vaira Vike-Freiberga at NATO summit. We would like to build our future on the rock of political certainty, not on the shifting sands of indecision. We do not want to be in some sort of grey zone of political uncertainty, we would like to enjoy the full sunshine of the liberties and rights that NATO has been defending so long. We do not want to be left out in the outer darkness, and we would not wish it happen to any other nation who has expressed the desire to join those nations that hold the same values, that follow the same ideals, and that are ready for the same efforts and the same strivings.

Nizami Ganjavi International Center - NGIC

64,477 views • 2 years ago

Michael Knowles openly argues Hasan Piker “should be censored” and kept out of “civilized” countries, and “should be in prison” but when Emily Jashinsky asks if the same standard should apply to Ann Coulter, he admits he would oppose it because he likes her. Michael Knowles: “Hasan Piker is terrible. He certainly should not be welcomed into any civilized country. I think he should be in prison ... That guy just totally sucks and he should be censored ... If he weren’t an anchor baby, we wouldn’t have to tolerate him in our country as well ... it’s only common sense to keep him out.” Emily Jashinsky pushing back: “What if they banned, for example, Ann Coulter for criticizing their immigration policies? Would that fit into the Michael Knowles acceptable ban category?” Michael Knowles: “I would disapprove of that because I love Ann Coulter.” Emily Jashinsky | hasanabi | Michael Knowles

Michael Knowles openly argues Hasan Piker “should be censored” and kept out of “civilized” countries, and “should be in prison” but when Emily Jashinsky asks if the same standard should apply to Ann Coulter, he admits he would oppose it because he likes her. Michael Knowles: “Hasan Piker is terrible. He certainly should not be welcomed into any civilized country. I think he should be in prison ... That guy just totally sucks and he should be censored ... If he weren’t an anchor baby, we wouldn’t have to tolerate him in our country as well ... it’s only common sense to keep him out.” Emily Jashinsky pushing back: “What if they banned, for example, Ann Coulter for criticizing their immigration policies? Would that fit into the Michael Knowles acceptable ban category?” Michael Knowles: “I would disapprove of that because I love Ann Coulter.” Emily Jashinsky | hasanabi | Michael Knowles

HalalFlow

461,574 views • 3 months ago