Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Christians, you need to understand something most churches will never teach you. For 2,000 years, organized Jewish power has treated Christianity as its primary enemy. This isn’t ancient history it’s a continuous pattern with names, organizations, and mountains of documentation. Here are the biggest, most devastating attacks: 1. The...

22,197 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The Bolshevik Revolution and the aftermath of World War II represent two of the most devastating blows ever delivered to Christian civilization and the same networks were heavily involved in both. In Russia, Jews were a tiny minority, yet they achieved wildly disproportionate power in the early Bolshevik regime. While Jews made up roughly 4-5% of the population, they held key leadership positions in the Party and especially the Cheka secret police during the Red Terror. Figures like Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, and Yagoda were central. The Cheka, under leaders including Genrikh Yagoda, systematically targeted the Russian Orthodox Church executing tens of thousands of priests, destroying or desecrating over 50,000 churches, and wiping out the spiritual backbone of Christian Russia. This was not random violence. It was a deliberate ideological campaign to eradicate Christianity as the soul of the Russian people. The same pattern of ethnic overrepresentation and targeted destruction of Christian institutions seen across centuries was on full display. After World War II, the assault continued through different means in the West. The Frankfurt School almost entirely Jewish intellectuals like Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, and Fromm developed Critical Theory, a weaponized form of cultural Marxism designed to undermine Western Christian civilization from within. They attacked the family, traditional morality, authority, and religion itself, repackaging their ideas for American universities. These ideas metastasized into the cultural revolution of the 1960s and beyond. The post-war period also saw heavy Jewish influence in Hollywood, media, academia, and the legal system that accelerated the removal of Christianity from public life. The same networks that helped dismantle Christian Russia now worked to secularize and transform Christian America and Europe first through legal challenges (removing school prayer), then through mass immigration, then through control of cultural output. The post you’re looking at nails it: The Bolsheviks didn’t just defeat armies. They understood that to kill a civilization, you must destroy its art, its architecture, its music, its liturgy the forms through which its beliefs live in the world. Cathedrals demolished. Sacred art destroyed. Liturgy suppressed. That is exactly what they did to Christian Russia. And the cultural equivalents of that destruction were transmitted to the West after the war. The pattern is unmistakable. When these networks gained power over Christian societies whether through revolution in Russia or cultural infiltration in the West the target was always the same: the historic Christian faith and the civilization it built. The survival of Christian culture was never accidental. It survived centuries of pressure precisely because it was rooted in something deeper than politics or economics. The current assault is simply the latest chapter in a very old war. The forms through which Christianity lived in the world cathedrals, liturgy, art, family, public morality are under sustained attack. The Bolsheviks showed what total war against Christian civilization looks like. The post-war West shows what sophisticated, institutional subversion looks like. Both chapters deserve serious study. It’s repeating under new names today…

Madlad

21,811 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Roger Waters has appeared on the latest episode of Tucker Carlson's podcast. Not something I'd normally bother watching, but I was curious enough to give this one a go. In this clip, Waters predictably throws around all the usual "apartheid" and "genocide" buzzwords before mocking Christian Zionism, while Tucker basically argues that it's fundamentally incompatible with Christianity. The reality is Christian Zionism is a perfectly coherent position. Christianity didn't appear out of nowhere. Jesus was born a Jew, lived among Jews, preached in Judea and Galilee, and the defining events of Christianity all took place in what is now Israel and the surrounding region. Supporting Israel as a Christian Zionist isn't about believing Jews must convert to Christianity or accept Jesus as the Messiah. Christianity and Judaism are different faiths. It's about recognising that Christianity is built on Jewish history. If the archaeological record of ancient Israel were wiped out, we'd also lose countless places, artefacts and pieces of evidence connected to the world Christ lived in. The historical setting of Christianity cannot be separated from the history of ancient Israel. The irony is that many of Israel's enemies deny that Jews ever had a legitimate historical connection to the land in the first place. Once you erase that history, the archaeological sites, historical evidence and cultural heritage tied to it become much easier to dismiss, rewrite or destroy. That's why protecting Jewish history also helps preserve the historical foundations of Christianity. So the idea that Christian Zionism is somehow incompatible with Christianity has never made much sense. Christianity is inseparable from Jewish history, so why wouldn't Christians care about preserving the land, history and archaeological record that form the backdrop to their own faith?

Aɴᴛ

15,748 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 ALERT AMERICA: ANOTHER CHURCH CONVERTED - AND THEY NAMED IT “MOSQUE OF JESUS” Masjid Isa Ibn Maryam (“Mosque of Jesus, Son of Mary”) — Syracuse, New York This is the next church takeover — and they didn’t just convert a Christian house of worship. They spit in the face of Christians with the branding. They turned a church into a mosque… and then labeled it “Mosque of Jesus.” That’s not respect. That’s psychological warfare. Because Islam does not honor the Jesus of the Bible. Islam’s “Jesus” is not the Son of God. He is not crucified. He does not resurrect. And he does not save. The Islamic version of Jesus is used as a tool to refute Christianity, dismantle the Cross, and validate Muhammad. And that’s exactly why Christians must stop falling for the oldest deception in the book: ⚠️ “WE BELIEVE IN JESUS” IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS Muslim influencers and apologists aggressively target Christians with the same scripted tactic: They claim the Quran “respects Jesus”… Then insist the Quran’s version is more authentic… While quietly destroying everything Christianity is built on. This isn’t dialogue. It’s conversion strategy. Major Islamic online figures have built massive platforms pushing these narratives, using emotional manipulation, debate traps, and “same Jesus” messaging designed to confuse Christians and blur the line between truth and submission. ✅ THE CORE DIFFERENCE: ISLAM ERADICATES THE CROSS Christianity stands on one foundation: ✝️ Christ crucified and risen. Islam explicitly denies it: 📌 “They did not kill him, nor crucify him…” — Qur’an 4:157 📌 Those who say Christ is God are labeled disbelievers — Qur’an 5:17 / 5:72 📌 Christians are commanded to be fought and subdued — Qur’an 9:29 This is not a “small theological disagreement.” It is a direct assault on the center of Christianity. And the ultimate endgame is not hidden: Islamic tradition describes Jesus returning not to redeem humanity, but to destroy the cross and enforce Islamic dominance. THIS IS NOT “RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.” IT’S RELIGIOUS DOMINANCE. Churches across America are falling silent… …and mosques are rising in their place, not just as places of prayer, but as permanent ideological infrastructure. And now they are taking Christian sanctuaries and rebranding them with Christian names to neutralize Christian resistance. That is not coexistence. That is conquest. Church by church. City by city. State by state. America: wake up.

Amy Mek

60,340 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Christian brothers and sisters, you need to watch this video with clear eyes. This is not conspiracy theory. These are Israeli officials, including Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1980s, openly discussing ambitions for a vastly expanded Greater Israel territory that includes not just Gaza and the West Bank, but significant portions of Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and beyond. Jesus warned us repeatedly about the Pharisees and their traditions. He called them a “brood of vipers” and said they nullified the word of God for the sake of their own traditions. The religion practiced today as Judaism is not the faith of Moses and the Prophets, it is the direct continuation of the Pharisees and the Talmud. The Old Testament prophets repeatedly warned Israel that when they turned from God, they would become a curse to the nations around them. The pattern we see in this video the relentless drive for territorial expansion, the supremacist ideology, and the willingness to destabilize entire regions, is completely consistent with that ancient warning. As Christians, we are commanded to “love our neighbor.” We are called to be peacemakers. Yet we are told that supporting modern Israel is somehow a religious duty. This video shows exactly what that support actually looks like in practice: the destruction and displacement of entire nations while American Christians are expected to foot the bill and remain silent. The New Testament is clear “They are not all Israel who are of Israel.” The covenant was always conditional on faithfulness. The idea that modern Israel has some divine right to conquer its neighbors is not historic Christianity it is a 20th century theological innovation called Christian Zionism. Jesus said by their fruits you shall know them. Look at the fruits. This should concern every Christian who still believes the words of Jesus matter more than political alliances. The same spirit that opposed Christ 2,000 years ago has not changed. It has simply taken on new political form. Watch the video. Then ask yourself honestly. Is this what the Kingdom of God looks like?

Madlad

18,236 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

On Palm Sunday the holiest day of the Christian calendar, the beginning of the week that 2.4 billion Christians consider the most sacred in human history — Israeli police physically blocked Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Turned back at gunpoint of Israeli ethnosupremacy on the most important Sunday in Christianity. The Latin Patriarchate confirmed it in writing: “For the first time in centuries, the Heads of the Church were prevented from celebrating the Palm Sunday Mass at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, this incident is a grave precedent and disregards the sensibilities of billions of people around the world.” The caliph al-Hakim destroyed it in 1009 and it was rebuilt. Saladin took Jerusalem in 1187 and still gave it back to the Christians within three years. Built by Constantine the Great in 335 AD, this is the site where billions of Christians believe Jesus was crucified, buried and rose from the dead — the single most sacred physical location in the entire Christian world and it took the State of Israel in 2026 to bar its own Patriarch from walking through its doors on Palm Sunday. What the Persians, the Crusaders, Saladin and the Ottomans never did Netanyahu’s thugs masquerading as police did this morning. Macron condemned it as joining “a worrying series of violations of the status of holy sites in Jerusalem.” Meloni called it an offence “against every community that recognises religious freedom.” Italy summoned the Israeli ambassador to Rome. And yet somehow we are supposed to accept the narrative that the greatest persecutors of Christians across the Holy Land, Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria… is Iran. The Christian population of the Holy Land has collapsed under Israeli occupation from 20% in 1948 to barely 2% today, driven out by land confiscation, persecution, checkpoints, demolished churches and the slow suffocation of a people in their own ancestral home. Cardinal Pizzaballa himself said it with quiet devastation this afternoon: “This absence is not merely a matter of formalities. It is the war (that Israel launched) that has interrupted our festive journey, making even the simple joy of following our King difficult.” The Third Temple cult blocked the tomb of Christ on Palm Sunday. If you needed one image to understand what this war is really about that’s it!

THE ISLANDER

27,421 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Your claim that Jesus of Nazareth never existed is historically false. Most atheists who have studied the record accept that a historical Jesus existed. His existence as a real first century figure is not a matter of Christian faith….its mainstream historical consensus. Scholars across the spectrum including leading agnostic atheist New Testament expert Bart D Ehrman (see attached video) affirm that Jesus was a real person who lived, taught and was crucified in Judea under Pontius Pilate. This is based on multiple independent early sources as we have strong non Christian corroboration from both Jewish and Roman writers who had every incentive to ignore or dismiss him but they didnt. Here is four of the earliest non Christian references: 1.) Jewish historian Josephus (37–100AD) In Antiquities of the Jews Josephus describes Jesus as “a wise man” who performed “surprising deeds” was a teacher and “was crucified by Pontius Pilate at the suggestion of the Jewish leaders.” He even mentions “James…the brother of Jesus” and records his execution and refers to Jesus as “the Christ” independently confirming the very claim of the early church. 2.) Roman historian Tacitus (56–120AD) who was hostile to Christians and despised them: In “Annals 15:44” he confirms that “Christus” suffered the extreme penalty of crucifixion under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius. He called Christianity “a mischievous superstition” that originated in Judea and spread to Rome. Tacitus recorded that Emperor Nero blamed the Christians for the Great Fire of Rome in 64AD using them as scapegoats to divert public anger from himself. 3.) Roman Governor Pliny the Younger (61–113AD) wrote a detailed letter to Emperor Trajan asking how to handle “these Christians.” He states in his letter: “These Christians were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a GOD and to BIND themselves by oath….refusing to return a trust when called upon to do so.” Pliny was investigating Christians because the movement was growing so rapidly causing social tension. He did not like Christians and even tortured some to find out what they were doing in their meetings. He believed Christianity was a “depraved excessive superstition” because from a Roman viewpoint worshiping a crucified Jewish man as God was ridiculous and subversive. Their loyalty to Christ bothered Pliny who expressed confusion about the legal implications of someone identifying as a Christian as there was no clear law against the faith itself. Emperor Trayjan replies to Pliny: “They are not to be sought out; if they are denounced and convicted, they are to be punished with this reservation that whoever denies that he is a Christian and really proves it..that is by worshiping our gods even though he was under suspicion in the past shall obtain pardon through repentance.” 4.) Roman historian Suetonius who lived from 69–122AD: “In Life of Claudius” page 25.4 he refers to “Christus” as the one who “instigated” disturbances among Jews in Rome eventually leading Emperor Claudius to expel them (this historical fact aligns w Acts 18:2). No ancient critic….pagan, Jewish or otherwise ever denied Jesus existed or was crucified. They mocked his teachings, ridiculed the resurrection and attacked his followers but they never questioned the basic historical facts of his life and death. Theism doesnt disprove the existence of gods and the historical reality of Jesus isnt dependent on proving his divinity. It simply establishes that the central figure of Christianity was not invented. He was a real person whose life and death are attested by early, independent and often hostile sources Your flippant ‘toasts and dog butts’ dismissal doesnt hold up against the historical evidence. Jesus was a real first century figure….a fact confirmed by multiple independent ancient sources and not just the Bible.

Lion of Judah

14,254 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Christians are being massacred in Nigeria—churches burned, villages destroyed—yet no one seems to care, not even Christian leaders in the Western world. How can the world watch this and stay silent? Innocent Christian believers, including entire families (women and children), who refused to deny their faith in God for Allah, were locked inside their churches and homes and burned alive as human sacrifices by bloodthirsty mobs of armed Muslim men, who slaughtered over 200 Christians that way in a single night in Yelwata. Those who tried to escape the flames (mainly the small children) were met with deadly bursts of gunfire by jihadists, who made sure the victims died on the spot. Their bodies were disfigured by countless bullets and ripped into pieces with machetes. The world’s response? Total silence. But when President Trump criticizes Nigeria’s regime, its Muslim president (a vocal supporter of Hamas and Gaza) responds with a smear campaign against Trump, portraying his concerns for Christians as “racism” and “Islamophobia” against supporters of Palestinians. This is the twisted reality of Islamophobia: exposing the genocide of Christians is forbidden, while ignoring it is “tolerance.” Will you let the fear of “Islamophobia” labels silence you? Unfortunately, most Western leaders choose to appease jihadists rather than defend persecuted Christians. Keep the Christians of Nigeria in your prayers 🙏💔

Liza Rosen

16,490 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Syria was one of the first places in the world to have a Christian community – the community is mentioned in the Book of Acts and St Paul’s famous conversion on the road to Damascus... Christians are not foreign to Syrian land; they have not been imported; they are, in fact, founders and original inhabitants. Name “Syria” is derived from Assyrian and Syriac Christian denominations, which constituted 80% of the country’s population before Islam arrived in 7th Century AD. Syrian Christians are survivors no matter which other group is in power, although they have suffered at the hands of most who have ruled or invaded Syria over time. Syria’s Christians pride themselves on their national identity, patriotism and participation in the struggle for Syria’s independence and their role during formation of modern Syrian state. Their support of the Palestinian struggle against Israel’s occupation and their Pan-Arab identity prove their unwavering connection to region’s peoples and their struggles toward independence. There are several theories have emerged to explain the caution and silence of Syria’s Christians towards the regime’s increasing brutality. They are afraid of the extremist opposition, and it is easy to single Christians out because they are concentrated in urban areas. They also tend to follow the line dictated by the leadership of their respective churches. And despite some token commanders, they are underrepresented in Syria’s military machine, for reasons ranging from a personal dislike of violence to preference for civilian careers, to meticulously calculated sectarian policy of the Assad regimes that have ruled the country for nearly five decades. The plight of Syria’s Christians stems from the fact that, while they have been used for show, they are actually marginalized by the regime and maligned by the opposition. Before Syrian Civil War, approximately 1.5 million - 10% of Syrian population were Christians. The number is thought to have dropped sharply in recent years, but by how much is unclear. There could now be as few as 300,000 Christians left in Syria today. Christians predominately live in and around cities of Damascus, Aleppo, Homs, Hama, Latakia and in Hasaka governorate. Most Syrian Christians are members of either Eastern Orthodox Church’s Patriarchate of Antioch and All the East or Syriac Orthodox Church (part of Oriental Orthodox family of churches). Most of the Catholics in Syria belong to the Melkite Greek Catholic Church. There are also a minority of Protestants, including Congregationalist, Presbyterian and Armenian Evangelical Churches. Like rest of the Syrian population, the Christian community in Syria has been hugely affected by the ongoing civil war and its consequences. Along with other minority groups, such as Druze, Christians are particularly vulnerable to community violence from extremist groups. Huge numbers have fled, leading to a dramatic decline in the number of Christians in Syria. More than 120 churches and Christian places of worship have been destroyed since Syrian civil war began. But main reason that Christian families are forced to leave is not targeted persecution, but the deteriorating living conditions, lack of employment or education opportunities, escalating living costs and continued dangers caused by fighting. 🎥© eastern_christians (IG) #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

90,031 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Israel And Its Supporters Are Causing Attacks On Jewish Institutions Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt gave a bizarre appearance on CNN in response to an attempted car bombing of a Michigan synagogue by a man whose Lebanese family members were killed by Israeli forces. “We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East,” Greenblatt said. “That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don’t like on the other side of the planet. And we really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies, to stop with the accusations, and then tell us ‘but we oppose antisemitism’. You don’t get to say you’re opposed to hate if you’re trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories.” Now, at first glance it this might read like Greenblatt is taking the entirely reasonable position that it is wrong to blame Jewish Americans for the actions of the Israeli government. But take a closer look at his use of the phrase “the Jewish state”. What Greenblatt is actually doing here is claiming it’s an antisemitic conspiracy theory to blame the state of Israel for its war crimes, while simultaneously lumping all Jewish people in with the actions of that state. That’s what he’s doing when he says “Jewish people, the Jewish state” in the same breath while talking about Israeli acts of mass military violence. It’s so obnoxious how genocide apologists like Greenblatt make a living actively telling everyone that Jews and Judaism are inseparable from the acts of the Israeli government, but whenever there’s an extremist attack by someone who doesn’t distinguish between western Jews and the state of Israel it gets blamed on the pro-Palestine left. Pro-Palestine leftists perform endless verbal gymnastics to avoid conflating Jewish people with the state of Israel, while Israel and its supporters conflate them constantly. Yet we’re always the ones who get blamed whenever there’s a terror attack on a Jewish institution by someone enraged by Israel’s actions. Zionists are the ones doing everything they can to make sure people see the state of Israel as synonymous with Jews and Judaism. That is what they are doing every time they claim a criticism of Israel’s actions is hate speech against Jews. They are claiming that the nation and its government are one and the same as the entirety of the Jewish faith and its adherents. Pro-Palestine leftists have been doing the exact opposite. We go to great pains to make sure all our arguments are carefully worded to avoid being interpreted as an attack on the Jewish faith, making it clear that our grievance is with the state of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism which supports that state’s abusive nature. And then Israel apologists come in and smear those meticulously crafted arguments as a hateful attack on all Jews everywhere. Zionists are therefore responsible for the growing perception that our Jewish neighbors and countrymen are culpable for the abuses of the Israeli government. When more attacks on Jewish institutions occur (and they will), it is Israel and its supporters who will hold the blame for this, not the pro-Palestine left. I am not saying attacks on Jewish institutions should happen. I am not saying it will be good when they do happen. I’m saying it will happen, and when it happens it will be a terrible thing. And it will be the fault of Israel and its supporters. We’ve been running around like crazy trying to stop this, falling all over ourselves to thwart the Zionist efforts to conflate Jews with Israel, but our voices aren’t strong enough. We’re not the ones getting loudly amplified by every mass media outlet, they are. It’s not people like me getting invited to appear on CNN to talk to Wolf Blitzer, it’s people like Jonathan Greenblatt. So when we lose the narrative war on this front and the next extremist attack occurs, it won’t be our fault. It will be theirs. It will be the fault of Israel and its apologists. We fought them as hard as we could to prevent this, but they won. And the consequences of this will therefore rest squarely on their shoulders.

Caitlin Johnstone

33,183 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Followers have asked me to comment on this video about Christian Nationalism from the perspective of a Catholic-Christian sympathetic to Orthodox Christianity. This X Post is exclusively & only about the pastors interviewed below, no one else. We should avoid the ideology of both Christian Nationalism interpreted by the far-right & radical feminism on the far-left. Men of the book (Christians, Muslims & the Jewish People) should walk together shoulder to shoulder in the name of synodality. We should support & promote traditional Christianity that is practiced voluntarily, patriarchy in the household, a true respect for women, and a respect for American culture. 1) Women must have and maintain the right to vote. We men should respect and defend this right, and we must protect the 19th Amendment. 2) Wives should voluntarily choose to submit to their husbands, and husbands should lead their wives and family. 3) We must have patriarchal households to maintain basic societal order, but not an exclusively patriarchal society. Two parties in a household who are partners will more likely than not constantly argue and eventually divorce. 4) Women who first serve their families as traditional homemakers absolutely deserve to be societal leaders, just as Our Lady reigns queen of heaven (Revelation 12:1-2). Christ turned to his disciple and said, "Woman, behold your son... Behold, your mother." (John 19:26-27). The Catholic and Orthodox Churches are both approximately 2,000 years old, tracing their origins back to the apostles. They tragically separated formally in 1054 CE. Catholics and Orthodox follow a tradition that includes not only Scripture but also Sacred Tradition and the authority of the Church. This tradition is seen as an essential guide for interpreting the Bible. Our 3rd wave feminist friends who attempt to claim the title of Christian while also practicing mysticism, Neo-Paganism, astrology, and worshipping the divine feminine often cite the doctrine of sola scriptura (Scripture alone). Separately, Reformed Protestant Christians also follow the doctrine of sola scriptura. Sola scriptura means they view the Bible as the sole infallible source of Christian teaching, which often leads to varied interpretations.(Anglicans and Episcopalians are slightly different in their view of tradition.) People interpret the Bible through their own lens, and some do so wrongly. This is why church authority, a Patriarch devoted to God alone, and his subordinate Patriarchs, are essential to guide us on our spiritual journey. The issue with Christian Nationalism is that its followers are typically Protestants who hold a co-equal authority with other Protestants: Sola Scriptura. For example, both Orthodox Christians and Catholics understand that wives must submit to their husbands because church tradition and its patriarchal leadership reinforce the Bible's teachings on the matter. The consequence is that Catholic nations often remain Catholic, and Orthodox nations remain Orthodox. Sola Scriptura gives radical feminism fertile ground for growth. When feminism takes root in Non-Denominational Protestantism, as seen in nations like Sweden, the UK, and Norway, men may feel they have no other choice but to turn to masculine, patriarchal religions such as Catholicism (Christianity) or Islam, just so they can find a wifeable bride that isn't subject to extremist feminism. For example, in Protestant Christianity, when a Protestant reads Ephesians 5:21, "Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ," progressive feminists might use this verse to argue that husbands should submit to wives. They often ignore the fact that Eve was made for and from Adam as a helpmate. Since Catholics and Orthodox have church authority to enforce the correct interpretation of Scripture, Protestant Christian Nationalists, who lack that church authority, are vulnerable to such misinterpretations. Catholics and Orthodox are not. Catholics and Orthodox have Patriarchs; our Protestant friends do not. We should promote Christian patriarchy exclusively in households, embrace classical liberalism, reject political extremism, say no to populism, and respect American exceptionalism. These are my opinions alone and are only directed towards the pastors in the below video, no one else and no other organization. The last thing a Protestant Calvinist pastor wants is a "New Crusade." His Holiness, the Bishop Of Rome, Patriarch of the West, is American. May we all walk together in the name of friendship & brotherhood. Have mercy on me, a sinner. See link below, for full video:

Theron Bassett

54,554 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The propaganda claim “Putin is restoring Christian civilization, defending traditional Christianity, and governing in harmony with Russia’s Christian majority.” Putin has not restored Christian freedom. He has elevated one politically useful institution the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church while repressing Christians and other believers who operate independently of the Kremlin. - Putin protects a state-aligned church, not Christianity The Kremlin gives the Russian Orthodox Church privileged status, property, media access, influence in education, and a ceremonial role in the state. In return, Patriarch Kirill and other senior church officials legitimize Putin’s rule and portray Russia’s wars and geopolitical ambitions in religious language. Christians outside that structure are prosecuted. Russia’s government has targeted Protestants, Baptists, Pentecostals, independent evangelicals and other Christians under laws concerning “missionary activity,” “extremism” and “undesirable organizations.” In 2024 and the first four months of 2025, Forum 18 identified at least 124 prosecutions under Russia’s restrictions on missionary activity, and said the real number was probably higher. The 2025 USCIRF report documents Protestants being imprisoned, sentenced to forced labor or prosecuted for such things as: -sharing material from a prohibited church on social media; -showing videos of foreign pastors at a religious meeting; -collecting donations for a religious organization; -belonging to Protestant organizations the state had labeled “undesirable.” Pentecostal Christian Maksim Makushin was sentenced to two years and eight months in prison after refusing military service on religious grounds. Protestant Christians Vyacheslav Reznichenko and Andrey Kapatsyna also remained imprisoned, while a Baptist was fined for refusing military service. Even Orthodox priests are punished when they challenge the Kremlin. Father Kostiantyn Maksimov, was seized after opposing the Russian Orthodox Church’s takeover of his diocese and was ultimately given a 14-year sentence on espionage charges and transferred to a Russian labor camp. Russia’s Supreme Court classified the Jehovah’s Witnesses, an extremist organization. Russia’s “Christian majority” is largely cultural, not evidence of a religious revival. 72% identify themselves to be orthodox but one out of 10 actually go to church. But that’s what Tucker wants for American Protestant or any American Christian, who doesn’t toe the line.

Insurrection Barbie

17,392 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

America is hostile to Christianity. Democracy slowly but surely corrupts the faith from within. Reading Tocqueville & the Founding Fathers between the lines convinced me of this. Look at the sorry state of Christianity at 250 compared to America’s Puritan founding. That is the result of two centuries of democratic corrosion and this weakening will only continue. What people are calling a “Christian revival” is a mere blip on this macro downward trajectory, a knee-jerk reaction to the excesses of progressivism of the last 20 years. Reading Tocqueville convinced me that America will never be truly Christian, unless it gives up being a liberal democracy (e.g. Integralism). Look at American Christianity today, it is already more American than it is Christian: Jesus preaches against wealth and yet I’ve rarely heard an american pastor do so. I hear the prosperity gospel quite often, but never sincere urges to poverty, asceticism, or monasticism as can be loudly heard in every Christian society prior. Christianity teaches love and humility; the American right co-opts it for hate and superiority. The Bible prescribes universal gender norms, sexual codes, ethical standards; the American left appropriates it for the latest political fads of the day. But the most hostile democratic force against all religions, not just Christianity, is toleration. The Bible is clear about Jesus’ singular status: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” It’s clear about the demonic or, at the very least, inferior status of the other faiths. And yet most American christians show not just tolerance but a puzzling affirmation of other religions. Tocqueville saw the terrible cost of this toleration, in a private letter in 1831, he wrote: ”this so-called tolerance … is nothing but a huge indifference.” Christianity could flourish for a 1000 years under persecution. Christianity did flourish for a 1000 years persecuting others. But just 250 years under liberal toleration and what Christians left have already stopped caring about ultimate questions, masking their indifference under the banner of toleration. Perhaps this was the Founders’ plan all along, Jefferson writes: “the way to silence religious disputes, is to take no notice of them.” To see how strange and corrupting American religious toleration is, one need only look at how other cultures practice toleration. Look at how the ultra-orthodox Jews in Israel treat their Christian minority: they look down upon them as fools deceived by a false Messiah. They don’t hide their contempt either: they openly mock the Christians, but they stop at organized, legal persecution. This was the original meaning of toleration. Toleration came from the Latin root tolerare which meant “to bear, to suffer, to endure.” The ultra-orthodox merely “put up with” their Christian minority. American Christians, even (maybe especially) the hyper-religious ones, do not behave like that towards their jewish minority. If you behave like that in America, you will be called “intolerant.” Because American toleration requires not just the lack of legal discrimination but a positive affirmation of the other. This concession doesn’t seem like much (in fact, it has infinite benefits) but it completely subverts the original concept. Tolerare originally meant that the thing I’m tolerant of is bad, but I endure it for a greater good. American toleration demands you to affirm the thing you are tolerant of as good to begin with. This is a radical subversion because tolerare preserves a precious freedom of the mind to come up with one’s own judgements: as long as you do not compel the others’ body you are free to think as you wish in your soul. American toleration does not compel the body but strikes directly at the soul: you are not allowed to discriminate in thought and must affirm the other as good. This is why you hear so often “all religions teach the same lesson” (which, it always turns out, is some mushy platitude around love). American toleration is the most radical and thorough form of intolerance and the death of serious religious thinking. The ultra-orthodox Jews in their hostility secure the freedom that American Christians lose in their compassion. Tocqueville came to similar conclusions, on the deadly effects of religious toleration, in that private letter from 1831. And yet, in Democracy in America he defended the separation of Church and State and advocated for the liberal order. In this lecture, I am going to attempt to reconcile this seeming contradiction. What we are going to find is terrifying: democracy unleashes not just one, but four separate forces hostile Christianity. And the separation of Church and state is to protect the Church from these forces as much as it is to preserve the state, for democracies can not function without religion. That is to say, as much as America is hostile to christianity, it needs it even more. This is the tragedy of Democracy: it endlessly attacks the very religious pillar that sustains its existence.

Johnathan Bi

45,331 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce