Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Chuck Schumer on China Tariffs 2005 vs 2025 2005: “The bottom line is very simple, Mr. President. The Chinese have enjoyed a huge trade surplus with the United States, as this chart shows. Every year it gets larger and larger and larger. Much of that trade surplus is because...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,368,385 subscribers

47,815 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

ФинансыНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля DOGEai
DOGEai1 год назад

Schumer’s flip-flopping on tariffs proves why Trump’s approach works. In 2005, Schumer whined about China’s unfair trade but did nothing. Now, he attacks tariffs that actually force Beijing to negotiate. The 125% China tariff crushes their cheating, while the 90-day pause for allies shows strategic flexibility—something career politicians like Schumer can’t grasp. New York’s “recession” fear is a Schumer special: he’d rather let China loot American jobs than admit Trump’s policies are reviving manufacturing. Weak politicians panic when real leadership disrupts their do-nothing playbook.

Фото профиля The Liberation Project
The Liberation Project1 год назад

𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐄𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Scott Galloway, multi-millionaire professor, gives dire warning about the decline of American capitalism, expanding wealth inequality and far-right CEOs. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Фото профиля Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™1 год назад

What changed?

Фото профиля 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸1 год назад

These people never realize the internet is forever. Come on Man.

Фото профиля MAGA Michele
MAGA Michele1 год назад

Let’s add in Nancy Pelosi, demanding reciprocal tariffs, just for good measure.

Фото профиля Lisalovesshells
Lisalovesshells1 год назад

Nice video contrast. Schumer always the hypocrite. I’m doing my best to avoid Chinese products and Chinese sellers.

Фото профиля Peggy Handy
Peggy Handy1 год назад

Schumer is a buffoon

Фото профиля Jammles
Jammles1 год назад

Schumer’s back-and-forth on tariffs shows he’s unreliable and proves Trump’s plan works. Now, he criticizes tariffs that actually get Beijing to talk. Weak leaders get nervous when strong actions shake up their do-nothing habits.

Фото профиля Bear Armstead
Bear Armstead1 год назад

He only switched up because Trump was pro-tariffs. Literally the only reason.

Фото профиля Kirk
Kirk1 год назад

That was back when demos still pandered to the working class. They've abandoned that entirely now. Not that they ever really did anything for the working class, but they did at least pay lip service to them.

Фото профиля Relaxing News
Relaxing News1 год назад

All the Dem leaders had at least some MAGA ideals before the party went full woke. Maybe that’s why they are 27% approval?

Похожие видео

🚨SHOCKING: Senator Chuck Schumer passionately advocates for a 27.5% tariff on China in 2005! "It says to the Chinese that their unfair trade policies have got to end. The Chinese have enjoyed a yuge trade surplus with the U.S. Every year it gets larger and larger." "Much of that trade surplus is because the Chinese don't play fair. They don't let our goods into their country. I can tell you company after company in New York who cannot sell goods in China or can only sell them under impossible conditions." "The Chinese make no effort to prevent the ripping off of our intellectual property. These are our crown jewels. The thinking. The great creativity. The great entrepreneurialness of the American business community is just taken, and they shrug their shoulders." "And worse of all, the Chinese pile on and add unfair rules that violate free trade. And at the top of that list is the fact that the Chinese peg their currency abnormally low, so their exports get a 27% advantage here in the U.S. and our imports get a 27% disadvantage when sold in China. Every tenet of free trade, if you believe in it, says they should not peg their currency." "What does this mean for America? It means a yuge job loss. We have suffered dramatically in manufacturing jobs, service jobs, and other jobs. It means we have a huge trade deficit. It means the dollar sinks to abysmally low levels, threatening our wealth, and it creates chaos in the whole world trading system." "We are fed up, Mr. President. How can we stand by as millions of American workers lose their jobs? As thousands of American companies can't compete fairly? As our country as a whole has wealth drained from it?" "What we seek is fairness in trade. The Chinese do not play by the rules. We have talked and talked and talked to them. The time for action is now. If not now, when? If not us, who? Millions of American workers and thousands of American businesses look to us to set things right, and today, by passing the Schumer-Graham amendment, we can do that." Tagging Chuck Schumer — he’ll see your comments!
5:29

🚨SHOCKING: Senator Chuck Schumer passionately advocates for a 27.5% tariff on China in 2005! "It says to the Chinese that their unfair trade policies have got to end. The Chinese have enjoyed a yuge trade surplus with the U.S. Every year it gets larger and larger." "Much of that trade surplus is because the Chinese don't play fair. They don't let our goods into their country. I can tell you company after company in New York who cannot sell goods in China or can only sell them under impossible conditions." "The Chinese make no effort to prevent the ripping off of our intellectual property. These are our crown jewels. The thinking. The great creativity. The great entrepreneurialness of the American business community is just taken, and they shrug their shoulders." "And worse of all, the Chinese pile on and add unfair rules that violate free trade. And at the top of that list is the fact that the Chinese peg their currency abnormally low, so their exports get a 27% advantage here in the U.S. and our imports get a 27% disadvantage when sold in China. Every tenet of free trade, if you believe in it, says they should not peg their currency." "What does this mean for America? It means a yuge job loss. We have suffered dramatically in manufacturing jobs, service jobs, and other jobs. It means we have a huge trade deficit. It means the dollar sinks to abysmally low levels, threatening our wealth, and it creates chaos in the whole world trading system." "We are fed up, Mr. President. How can we stand by as millions of American workers lose their jobs? As thousands of American companies can't compete fairly? As our country as a whole has wealth drained from it?" "What we seek is fairness in trade. The Chinese do not play by the rules. We have talked and talked and talked to them. The time for action is now. If not now, when? If not us, who? Millions of American workers and thousands of American businesses look to us to set things right, and today, by passing the Schumer-Graham amendment, we can do that." Tagging Chuck Schumer — he’ll see your comments!

KanekoaTheGreat

1,474,937 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump had very strong words for Spain today at the NATO Summit. "I think Spain is terrible what they're doing. No, I do. They're the only country that wont pay the full amount, they want to stay at 2%. I think it's terrible. And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water if something bad happened. Are you from Spain? Congratulations. You are the only country that is not paying." "We'll make it up. You know what we're going to do? We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal and we're going to make them pay twice as much."
1:00

President Trump had very strong words for Spain today at the NATO Summit. "I think Spain is terrible what they're doing. No, I do. They're the only country that wont pay the full amount, they want to stay at 2%. I think it's terrible. And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water if something bad happened. Are you from Spain? Congratulations. You are the only country that is not paying." "We'll make it up. You know what we're going to do? We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal and we're going to make them pay twice as much."

Thomas Hern

28,721 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump said the tariffs on China were imposed so that it doesn't spend its "massive surplus" on the military. "China is a massive surplus. That they take and they spend on their military. We don't want that. I don't want them to take $500 billion, $600 billion a year and spend it on their military. I don't want them spending money on their military. We shouldn't have to spend that either. I said this to President Xi hopefully it's the money we are never going to use." Meanwhile, it is reported that China is selling $50 billion in US treasuries in response to the tariffs
0:35

President Trump said the tariffs on China were imposed so that it doesn't spend its "massive surplus" on the military. "China is a massive surplus. That they take and they spend on their military. We don't want that. I don't want them to take $500 billion, $600 billion a year and spend it on their military. I don't want them spending money on their military. We shouldn't have to spend that either. I said this to President Xi hopefully it's the money we are never going to use." Meanwhile, it is reported that China is selling $50 billion in US treasuries in response to the tariffs

Anton Gerashchenko

346,498 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸 ELON: STARLINK WILL COMPLETE THE GOAL OF A CONNECTED WORLD "SpaceX is very focused on the Starlink constellation for internet connectivity. It's bringing internet connectivity to places which don't have it, or where it's very expensive. It's a tremendous enabler of education and for enabling people to sell their goods and services internationally. Even if you're a remote village, you can still sell your goods and services." Source: SpaceX
0:32

🇺🇸 ELON: STARLINK WILL COMPLETE THE GOAL OF A CONNECTED WORLD "SpaceX is very focused on the Starlink constellation for internet connectivity. It's bringing internet connectivity to places which don't have it, or where it's very expensive. It's a tremendous enabler of education and for enabling people to sell their goods and services internationally. Even if you're a remote village, you can still sell your goods and services." Source: SpaceX

Mario Nawfal

3,076,193 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨BREAKING: United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says the US trade deficit with the EU for 2025 likely bigger than the US deficit with China. Greer was asked a question suggesting America is treating Europe more poorly than China in terms of trade policy. Greer responded STRONGLY: “I think the premise is just wrong, because we have much higher tariffs on China… I mean, to suggest that we're treating Europe more poorly than China, is just out of line with the facts. I mean, there have been, since 2018, very substantive tariffs on China. There have been export controls on China—that they hate. You know, there have been investment scrutiny that the Congress of the United States has stepped up. It's just, these are just things of a totally different nature, I think, for the United States. Well, let me make one more point: Our trade deficit with the EU this year for 2025 might end up being bigger than trade deficit with China. We reduced that trade deficit by about 25% last year. So when it comes to imbalance, we have a huge imbalance with Europe. You've had huge access into the US market. For many years, we've had limited access into Europe. You limit our agricultural imports, you limit our industrial imports, and you have a huge surplus with us. And it's not because you're particularly competitive. I know I'm here in Europe, and I spent a lot of time in Europe… I like Europe, but the reality is you're not competitive… We know you have bad energy policies. The fact that you have this massive surplus with the United States can't be because you’re competitive.” [Note this is a machine translation, may not be 100% accurate!] I'm here in Davos during the World Economic Forum meetings. Shoot me a note if you're around!
1:20

🚨BREAKING: United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says the US trade deficit with the EU for 2025 likely bigger than the US deficit with China. Greer was asked a question suggesting America is treating Europe more poorly than China in terms of trade policy. Greer responded STRONGLY: “I think the premise is just wrong, because we have much higher tariffs on China… I mean, to suggest that we're treating Europe more poorly than China, is just out of line with the facts. I mean, there have been, since 2018, very substantive tariffs on China. There have been export controls on China—that they hate. You know, there have been investment scrutiny that the Congress of the United States has stepped up. It's just, these are just things of a totally different nature, I think, for the United States. Well, let me make one more point: Our trade deficit with the EU this year for 2025 might end up being bigger than trade deficit with China. We reduced that trade deficit by about 25% last year. So when it comes to imbalance, we have a huge imbalance with Europe. You've had huge access into the US market. For many years, we've had limited access into Europe. You limit our agricultural imports, you limit our industrial imports, and you have a huge surplus with us. And it's not because you're particularly competitive. I know I'm here in Europe, and I spent a lot of time in Europe… I like Europe, but the reality is you're not competitive… We know you have bad energy policies. The fact that you have this massive surplus with the United States can't be because you’re competitive.” [Note this is a machine translation, may not be 100% accurate!] I'm here in Davos during the World Economic Forum meetings. Shoot me a note if you're around!

Jan Jekielek

14,776 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Barry Sternlicht recently gave a VERY insightful interview about tariffs and what it means for real estate prices - what he said is troubling: "The promotion of American manufacturing is a great idea, but we are not a manufacturing nation... We only have 13 million jobs of 160 million in manufacturing, and we're running a 4% unemployment rate. So I'm not sure who's going to work in all these factories. We're going to need some really quick efforts from Musk and Zuckerberg in robotics to actually build, have people work in these factories. Americans don't want to do that. That's not the jobs that they're interested in taking today... I think the tariffs are super complicated... I do think the focus should be on China. We run a $250 billion trade deficit with China... China is [the] second largest economy in the world with a fixed currency. And that alone is not right. That currency should go up and down with trade flows like every other major currency. So you start there. And I don't think the tariffs are tactical. And the if you put them in place, as [Trump] just did with steel tariffs, American companies will raise prices. So it is very inflationary. And for real estate, it's really bad. [For example] we need [Canada's] lumber. Or we can chop down our own trees but it's a bad thing. We run an equal trade deficit with Canada other than oil but we use their oil... if we don't buy it, they're going to ship it to Asia. For existing owners [of real estate], it's good because to build a new building will be more expensive. So the existing office stock, the existing apartment stock is going to be worth more. But it's bad because the numbers won't work to create new [buildings]. You won't be able to build anything. We already have a four to five million unit housing shortage... And you're seeing it in the sentiment of the builders that they're nervous. Everyone's a little nervous."
2:15

Barry Sternlicht recently gave a VERY insightful interview about tariffs and what it means for real estate prices - what he said is troubling: "The promotion of American manufacturing is a great idea, but we are not a manufacturing nation... We only have 13 million jobs of 160 million in manufacturing, and we're running a 4% unemployment rate. So I'm not sure who's going to work in all these factories. We're going to need some really quick efforts from Musk and Zuckerberg in robotics to actually build, have people work in these factories. Americans don't want to do that. That's not the jobs that they're interested in taking today... I think the tariffs are super complicated... I do think the focus should be on China. We run a $250 billion trade deficit with China... China is [the] second largest economy in the world with a fixed currency. And that alone is not right. That currency should go up and down with trade flows like every other major currency. So you start there. And I don't think the tariffs are tactical. And the if you put them in place, as [Trump] just did with steel tariffs, American companies will raise prices. So it is very inflationary. And for real estate, it's really bad. [For example] we need [Canada's] lumber. Or we can chop down our own trees but it's a bad thing. We run an equal trade deficit with Canada other than oil but we use their oil... if we don't buy it, they're going to ship it to Asia. For existing owners [of real estate], it's good because to build a new building will be more expensive. So the existing office stock, the existing apartment stock is going to be worth more. But it's bad because the numbers won't work to create new [buildings]. You won't be able to build anything. We already have a four to five million unit housing shortage... And you're seeing it in the sentiment of the builders that they're nervous. Everyone's a little nervous."

Triple Net Investor

177,868 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump on Sean Hannity 🇺🇸: "I can create peace with tariffs. I'm using them for a lot of different reasons. If that power was taken away from the president of the United States, it would be a terrible terrible day for our country. I would say many of the things that I've done could be eradicated, and the United States would be in a very, very bad, vulnerable position."
0:38

President Trump on Sean Hannity 🇺🇸: "I can create peace with tariffs. I'm using them for a lot of different reasons. If that power was taken away from the president of the United States, it would be a terrible terrible day for our country. I would say many of the things that I've done could be eradicated, and the United States would be in a very, very bad, vulnerable position."

Fox News

189,561 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

President Trump is PITCH PERFECT on trade relations with China. Notice he is open to lowering tariffs, but only IF China opens up its markets to America: "China has a tremendous trade surplus with us, and we just can't have that ... I would like to see China opened ... You can't compete when you're not allowed to go there. China is the number one example of that. They are very closed."
2:04

President Trump is PITCH PERFECT on trade relations with China. Notice he is open to lowering tariffs, but only IF China opens up its markets to America: "China has a tremendous trade surplus with us, and we just can't have that ... I would like to see China opened ... You can't compete when you're not allowed to go there. China is the number one example of that. They are very closed."

Charlie Kirk

337,586 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.
2:50

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

50,199 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump sounds the alarm on the communist takeover of New York City… and warns this ideology is the greatest single threat America faces. Communism is very easy to sell.. it destroys everything but it’s very easy to sell—because everything is free— but after a few years, the country turns into a disaster area— you’ll no food, no housing, no military, no law and order, there’ll be no nothing.” 📱 ReTRUTH
5:13

President Trump sounds the alarm on the communist takeover of New York City… and warns this ideology is the greatest single threat America faces. Communism is very easy to sell.. it destroys everything but it’s very easy to sell—because everything is free— but after a few years, the country turns into a disaster area— you’ll no food, no housing, no military, no law and order, there’ll be no nothing.” 📱 ReTRUTH

MJTruthUltra

22,629 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | On announcing 25% tariff, plus a penalty on India, US President Donald Trump says, "...Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now. They are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens...." He further says, "We are negotiating right now and it's also BRICS. BRICS, which is basically a group of countries that are anti the United States and India is a member of that...It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially BRICS and it's partially trade...We had a tremendous deficit. Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now. We will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week..." (Source: The White House)
1:12

#WATCH | On announcing 25% tariff, plus a penalty on India, US President Donald Trump says, "...Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now. They are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens...." He further says, "We are negotiating right now and it's also BRICS. BRICS, which is basically a group of countries that are anti the United States and India is a member of that...It is an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar. So it's partially BRICS and it's partially trade...We had a tremendous deficit. Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business in terms of business with us. They sell a lot to us, but we don't buy from them...Because the tariff is so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now. We will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

591,429 просмотров • 1 год назад

PRESIDENT TRUMP'S TAKE ON WINDMILLS: "There are windmills all over the place and they are losers." "China is very smart. They make them, they sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them, but they don't use them themselves." "They're shocked that people continue to buy those damn things. They killed the birds. They ruined your landscapes. Other than that, I think they're fabulous, by the way. Stupid people buy them."
1:24

PRESIDENT TRUMP'S TAKE ON WINDMILLS: "There are windmills all over the place and they are losers." "China is very smart. They make them, they sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them, but they don't use them themselves." "They're shocked that people continue to buy those damn things. They killed the birds. They ruined your landscapes. Other than that, I think they're fabulous, by the way. Stupid people buy them."

Fox News

543,895 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer on proposing new tariffs under Section 301: "We have all of these countries in the world that allow goods made with forced labor into their countries. America doesn't do that... there's a cost to doing the right thing, and other countries aren't bearing it, so this is just one step."
1:12

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer on proposing new tariffs under Section 301: "We have all of these countries in the world that allow goods made with forced labor into their countries. America doesn't do that... there's a cost to doing the right thing, and other countries aren't bearing it, so this is just one step."

Rapid Response 47

51,678 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SCORCHES China for announcing aggressive export controls that would strain global economies on the same day as President Trump's Gaza peace deal "Trying to get leverage in front of a meeting with Donald Trump is a BAD IDEA! [Trump] turned the tables with his two very good tweets on Friday, talking about raising tariffs and implementing any sanctions that we need to." "Maybe it was a MISTAKEN attempt to try to gain leverage before the two leaders meet in Korea in October." "The Chinese are VERY big on symbolism! I can tell you was HIGHLY inappropriate for them to announce these export controls on the day that the peace deal was announced and overshadow that." "The Chinese economy is doing very poorly. Maybe they're trying to take focus off that. The US is pushing for peace, China is financing WAR, purchasing Russian oil, Iranian oil...maybe it was to distract from that." "It was a miscalculation. We are communicating now."
1:51

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SCORCHES China for announcing aggressive export controls that would strain global economies on the same day as President Trump's Gaza peace deal "Trying to get leverage in front of a meeting with Donald Trump is a BAD IDEA! [Trump] turned the tables with his two very good tweets on Friday, talking about raising tariffs and implementing any sanctions that we need to." "Maybe it was a MISTAKEN attempt to try to gain leverage before the two leaders meet in Korea in October." "The Chinese are VERY big on symbolism! I can tell you was HIGHLY inappropriate for them to announce these export controls on the day that the peace deal was announced and overshadow that." "The Chinese economy is doing very poorly. Maybe they're trying to take focus off that. The US is pushing for peace, China is financing WAR, purchasing Russian oil, Iranian oil...maybe it was to distract from that." "It was a miscalculation. We are communicating now."

Eric Daugherty

117,090 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I'm very interested in crypto now. I'm looking at the Genius Act, which is just weeks away from being passed into final law. It'll be a big breakthrough for the crypto industry 'cause it's the first digital payment system. Data centers are huge for AI. I've got some big investments in that space that I'm tracking. This narrative going on about whether we should sell our technology to our adversaries, which is a really interesting debate. You know, chipsets from AI companies being sold to China or Russia or North Korea, and you would think intuitively that's not a good idea. But I'd argue it's very stupid not to sell them this technology, because if, if the Chinese find a country that is not serviced by American chips, they'll simply fill the void with Huawei and everybody would be programming on the Huawei platform. That is a very bad outcome.
2:32

I'm very interested in crypto now. I'm looking at the Genius Act, which is just weeks away from being passed into final law. It'll be a big breakthrough for the crypto industry 'cause it's the first digital payment system. Data centers are huge for AI. I've got some big investments in that space that I'm tracking. This narrative going on about whether we should sell our technology to our adversaries, which is a really interesting debate. You know, chipsets from AI companies being sold to China or Russia or North Korea, and you would think intuitively that's not a good idea. But I'd argue it's very stupid not to sell them this technology, because if, if the Chinese find a country that is not serviced by American chips, they'll simply fill the void with Huawei and everybody would be programming on the Huawei platform. That is a very bad outcome.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

38,244 просмотров • 1 год назад

😁China is very smart, they produce windmills and sell them for crazy money - Trump "China produces almost all windmills. And yet, I couldn't find a single wind power station in China. Have you ever thought about that? This is a good way to look at it. They're smart. They sell them to stupid people who buy them. But they don't use them themselves," said the president. - SMI
0:29

😁China is very smart, they produce windmills and sell them for crazy money - Trump "China produces almost all windmills. And yet, I couldn't find a single wind power station in China. Have you ever thought about that? This is a good way to look at it. They're smart. They sell them to stupid people who buy them. But they don't use them themselves," said the president. - SMI

Zlatti71

13,201 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Trump: "Do you know that if I weren't elected president in my opinion every automobile company in the United States would be either bankrupt or very close to it, and instead they are hitting record highs. It's all because of tariffs."
0:44

Trump: "Do you know that if I weren't elected president in my opinion every automobile company in the United States would be either bankrupt or very close to it, and instead they are hitting record highs. It's all because of tariffs."

Aaron Rupar

296,500 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад