正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

CIA Behavioral Specialist Chase Hughes on how to identify a PSYOP. Sound familiar? 🤔🤔🤔 I asked GROK what content was suppressed during the 4 years of the Biden Administration. Absolutely insane! COVID-19 vaccine side effects claims or safety concerns. Waning or breakthrough COVID-19 infections post-vaccination. Criticism of COVID-19 vaccine... mandates or coercion. Doubts about COVID-19 PCR test accuracy or cycle thresholds. Claims COVID-19 originated from a lab (Wuhan Institute) rather than natural zoonotic spillover. Promotion of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or other off-label treatments for COVID-19. Assertions that masks were ineffective for preventing COVID-19 transmission. Criticism of school closures or remote learning policies during the pandemic. Content alleging overcounting of COVID-19 deaths or misattribution. Hunter Biden laptop contents (emails, videos, business dealings in Ukraine/China). New York Post story on Hunter Biden laptop (October 2020 suppression). 2020 election fraud allegations or "stop the steal" narratives. Claims of irregularities in mail-in/absentee ballots or drop boxes. Posts questioning 2020 election security or certification processes. January 6, 2021, events framing or alternative viewpoints. Parody, memes, or satirical content mocking Biden administration COVID policies. Negative economic commentary (e.g., inflation, gas prices, recession risks). Criticism of U.S. foreign policy (e.g., Afghanistan withdrawal handling). Content on border security, immigration policies, or migrant surges. Views skeptical of climate change policies or green energy mandates. Discussions of gender ideology, transgender issues, or related policies. Abortion-related content conflicting with administration positions. Posts critical of Ukraine aid or U.S. involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Specific flagged claims (e.g., "COVID survival rate 99.96%," vaccine-Bell's palsy links). Books/videos on Amazon/YouTube critical of vaccines or mandates (altered visibility/search). Content from labeled "disinformation" individuals/groups (e.g., "Disinformation Dozen").show more

Patriot

15,553 subscribers

15,752 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published •After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read by: NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH Nicolas Hulscher, MPH NOV 17, 2024 •The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination •This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancetand later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International •Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity •The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis •Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023 •All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included •Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death •Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart) •The mean age of death was 70.4 years •The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%) •Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases •The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days •Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration •A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%) •Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death •Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings •Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety •The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recall as: “A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” •The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning •First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN) •The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, "because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology."

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published •After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read by: NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH Nicolas Hulscher, MPH NOV 17, 2024 •The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination •This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancetand later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International •Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity •The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis •Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023 •All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included •Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death •Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart) •The mean age of death was 70.4 years •The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%) •Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases •The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days •Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration •A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%) •Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death •Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings •Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety •The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recall as: “A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” •The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning •First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN) •The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, "because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology."

Lyndsey, RN 💜🐭

153,138 次观看 • 1 年前

Newly released internal federal records on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the experts who were telling us coronavirus came from bats WE’RE INTENTIONALLY LYING “Turns out many of the experts who publicly insisted the coronavirus came from bats might have known better” “The nation's top scientists touted a March 2020 article downplaying theories that COVID-19 came from a lab in China. But documents obtained by Senator Rand Paul say the report's authors weren't certain. They were saying things like, oh, those are conspiracy theory people, or though the idea that it came from lab is implausible, and yet privately they're saying THE OPPOSITE.” “Other messages obtained by Poll say the FBI blocked Customs and Border Patrol from interviewing Peter Daszak. when he flew back to the U.S. from China in 2021. There were questions about the type of research that Daszak conducted in Wuhan. One key lawmaker believes the Biden administration tried to promote the theory that COVID came from a bat to suppress the lab leak idea” Remember FBI Director Kash Patel previously exposed that The CIA was behind the COVID 19 coverup working with Anthony Fauci He said “Gina Haspel as Director of The CIA authorized 6 case officers and intelligence analysts to be paid off so that they would change their assessment on COVID originations” Where are the prison sentences for the people who orchestrated Covid 19

Newly released internal federal records on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the experts who were telling us coronavirus came from bats WE’RE INTENTIONALLY LYING “Turns out many of the experts who publicly insisted the coronavirus came from bats might have known better” “The nation's top scientists touted a March 2020 article downplaying theories that COVID-19 came from a lab in China. But documents obtained by Senator Rand Paul say the report's authors weren't certain. They were saying things like, oh, those are conspiracy theory people, or though the idea that it came from lab is implausible, and yet privately they're saying THE OPPOSITE.” “Other messages obtained by Poll say the FBI blocked Customs and Border Patrol from interviewing Peter Daszak. when he flew back to the U.S. from China in 2021. There were questions about the type of research that Daszak conducted in Wuhan. One key lawmaker believes the Biden administration tried to promote the theory that COVID came from a bat to suppress the lab leak idea” Remember FBI Director Kash Patel previously exposed that The CIA was behind the COVID 19 coverup working with Anthony Fauci He said “Gina Haspel as Director of The CIA authorized 6 case officers and intelligence analysts to be paid off so that they would change their assessment on COVID originations” Where are the prison sentences for the people who orchestrated Covid 19

Wall Street Apes

24,955 次观看 • 1 个月前

NEW: Mark Zuckerberg reveals how the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor the truth about COVID-19 vaccine injuries. "They pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly true." "They said anything that says vaccine might have side effects; you need to take it down." "These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and scream and curse." Zuckerberg complied. Facebook banned vaccine injury support groups with hundreds of thousands of members. They labeled discussions about vaccine injuries as “malinformation”—factual information that should still be censored because it could lead to vaccine hesitancy. By doing so, Facebook silenced those suffering from vaccine-related injuries, preventing them from sharing their stories, seeking support, or finding treatment. And all of this censorship was to protect an experimental mRNA shot that doesn't stop infection or transmission—rushed to market with no long-term studies—produced by a big pharma company that has previously paid billions in fines for misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of its products.

NEW: Mark Zuckerberg reveals how the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor the truth about COVID-19 vaccine injuries. "They pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly true." "They said anything that says vaccine might have side effects; you need to take it down." "These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and scream and curse." Zuckerberg complied. Facebook banned vaccine injury support groups with hundreds of thousands of members. They labeled discussions about vaccine injuries as “malinformation”—factual information that should still be censored because it could lead to vaccine hesitancy. By doing so, Facebook silenced those suffering from vaccine-related injuries, preventing them from sharing their stories, seeking support, or finding treatment. And all of this censorship was to protect an experimental mRNA shot that doesn't stop infection or transmission—rushed to market with no long-term studies—produced by a big pharma company that has previously paid billions in fines for misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of its products.

KanekoaTheGreat

229,438 次观看 • 1 年前

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’

Camus

24,028 次观看 • 1 年前

In November 2020, #Pfizer and various rogue governments announced the global vaccination of the COVID-19 'poison' vaccine, officially beginning the #vaccine massacre On November 10, 2020, Mr. Miles Guo warned the world that the Pfizer vaccine was ineffective, stating that this was the result of control by dark forces in the world and urging people not to trust the COVID-19 vaccines. Mr. Guo’s revelation faced immense pressure but saved many lives... Mr. Miles Guo is the first and only vaccine #whistleblower in the world! —— 2020.11.10.MilesLive._ - ( "World's First Vaccine Rejection Advocate" ) The COVID-19 vaccine is a tool used by the CCP to enslave and control all human behavior! The vaccine is a weapon in the subsidiary war of biochemical weapons. A warning to those who have received the COVID-19 vaccine: if you want to survive, the only way to find a cure is to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party! It is the Chinese Communist Party that has spread the vaccine economy worldwide, turning it into a communist economy, a CCP economy, a global communist economy. Believe it or not, it's up to you! —— 2021.02.01.MilesLive._ - ( "COVID-19 Vaccine Control Warning" ) At the end of 2019, when the coronavirus was first released and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) claimed to the world that the #Wuhan virus, the coronavirus, was supposedly not transmissible between humans and that the #epidemic was preventable and controllable: It was Mr. Miles Guo and we, the fighters in the New Federal State of China & Whistleblower Movement, who, on January 15, 2020, during a live broadcast by the Rule of Law Foundation, warned the Western world that these were all lies from the CCP! We simultaneously issued warnings to the world to save it and tried to convey to the relevant US government departments the viewpoint that this was a #biological weapon attack! Miles Guo and his fellow fighters of the #NFSC and the Whistleblower Movement were pioneers in disclosing to the world that the coronavirus is a biological weapon created by the CCP. Starting in December 2019, the Whistleblower Movement has continuously exposed the truth behind the virus and the actual nature of the COVID-19 vaccines. We highlight the issues of vaccine-related disasters and the economic implications of vaccines, suggesting that the virus itself is not the primary threat. Instead, the real sinister objective is to enforce mass vaccination. —— 2021.08.21.MilesLive._ - ( "First Virus Weapon Whistleblower" ) The CCP has been researching how to turn #biochemical weapons into vaccines that can be used to #kill Americans and white #people on a large scale since the 1990s! Remember these key points: No virus, no vaccine; The ones who want to kill the world are definitely the CCP! Pfizer and the mainstream media are completely under the control of the CCP! —— 2021.12.15.MilesLive. In 2020, Mr. Miles Guo and the New Federal State of China were the only whistleblowers of the COVID-19 vaccine disaster! In February 2020, Mr. Miles Guo was the first person to warn the world that the biochemical virus was not the ultimate goal; The real core weapon was making people use the vaccine! As early as 2020, he informed the world that vaccine disasters, vaccine economics, vaccine technology, vaccine medicine, vaccine media, vaccine military, and vaccine politics would all erupt comprehensively! —— 2022.01.30.MilesLive._ - ( "Miles, COVID-19 vaccine whistleblower 2020" ) The harm caused by the CCP's coronavirus to humanity is immense! Artesunate is the only solution for removing residual COVID-19 vaccine from the body. For those who have received three or more doses, the only solution is Artesunate! It can help prevent sudden death, convulsions, and cancer — Artesunate! —— 2023.02.22.MilesLive._ - ( The Only Antidote: #Artesunate )

In November 2020, #Pfizer and various rogue governments announced the global vaccination of the COVID-19 'poison' vaccine, officially beginning the #vaccine massacre On November 10, 2020, Mr. Miles Guo warned the world that the Pfizer vaccine was ineffective, stating that this was the result of control by dark forces in the world and urging people not to trust the COVID-19 vaccines. Mr. Guo’s revelation faced immense pressure but saved many lives... Mr. Miles Guo is the first and only vaccine #whistleblower in the world! —— 2020.11.10.MilesLive._ - ( "World's First Vaccine Rejection Advocate" ) The COVID-19 vaccine is a tool used by the CCP to enslave and control all human behavior! The vaccine is a weapon in the subsidiary war of biochemical weapons. A warning to those who have received the COVID-19 vaccine: if you want to survive, the only way to find a cure is to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party! It is the Chinese Communist Party that has spread the vaccine economy worldwide, turning it into a communist economy, a CCP economy, a global communist economy. Believe it or not, it's up to you! —— 2021.02.01.MilesLive._ - ( "COVID-19 Vaccine Control Warning" ) At the end of 2019, when the coronavirus was first released and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) claimed to the world that the #Wuhan virus, the coronavirus, was supposedly not transmissible between humans and that the #epidemic was preventable and controllable: It was Mr. Miles Guo and we, the fighters in the New Federal State of China & Whistleblower Movement, who, on January 15, 2020, during a live broadcast by the Rule of Law Foundation, warned the Western world that these were all lies from the CCP! We simultaneously issued warnings to the world to save it and tried to convey to the relevant US government departments the viewpoint that this was a #biological weapon attack! Miles Guo and his fellow fighters of the #NFSC and the Whistleblower Movement were pioneers in disclosing to the world that the coronavirus is a biological weapon created by the CCP. Starting in December 2019, the Whistleblower Movement has continuously exposed the truth behind the virus and the actual nature of the COVID-19 vaccines. We highlight the issues of vaccine-related disasters and the economic implications of vaccines, suggesting that the virus itself is not the primary threat. Instead, the real sinister objective is to enforce mass vaccination. —— 2021.08.21.MilesLive._ - ( "First Virus Weapon Whistleblower" ) The CCP has been researching how to turn #biochemical weapons into vaccines that can be used to #kill Americans and white #people on a large scale since the 1990s! Remember these key points: No virus, no vaccine; The ones who want to kill the world are definitely the CCP! Pfizer and the mainstream media are completely under the control of the CCP! —— 2021.12.15.MilesLive. In 2020, Mr. Miles Guo and the New Federal State of China were the only whistleblowers of the COVID-19 vaccine disaster! In February 2020, Mr. Miles Guo was the first person to warn the world that the biochemical virus was not the ultimate goal; The real core weapon was making people use the vaccine! As early as 2020, he informed the world that vaccine disasters, vaccine economics, vaccine technology, vaccine medicine, vaccine media, vaccine military, and vaccine politics would all erupt comprehensively! —— 2022.01.30.MilesLive._ - ( "Miles, COVID-19 vaccine whistleblower 2020" ) The harm caused by the CCP's coronavirus to humanity is immense! Artesunate is the only solution for removing residual COVID-19 vaccine from the body. For those who have received three or more doses, the only solution is Artesunate! It can help prevent sudden death, convulsions, and cancer — Artesunate! —— 2023.02.22.MilesLive._ - ( The Only Antidote: #Artesunate )

诗和远方

303,472 次观看 • 2 年前

BREAKING: Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Slams Biden-Era Military COVID Vaccine Mandate as Having “No Scientific Justification” This week on Straight to the Point, I sat down with former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield and Brianne Dressen — a vaccine injury advocate who was a clinical trial volunteer that developed lifelong neuropathy within one hour of taking the COVID-19 vaccine. Redfield exclusively reveals that he believes the Biden-era military mandates had “no scientific justification...and was an emotional decision," while noting institutional reluctance to acknowledge harms to young service members with strong immune systems. Dressen discusses the disproportionate toll the vaccine took on young service members, including Karolina Stancik who we previously interviewed. This wide ranging interview digs deep on the vaccine fallout for our nation's service members. LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios 01:04 Brianne Dressen: Her Advocacy for Covid Vaccine Injured is Personal React19 - Official 01:57 An “Inordinate Number” of Young Vaccine Injured Service Members 02:30 Former CDC Director Robert Redfield: Military COVID Vaccine Mandate “No Scientific Justification Whatsoever” 03:10 Most Severe Response In Young, With Robust Immune Systems 04:02 Soldier Karoline Stancik’s Heart Condition “Service Connected” To Covid Vaccine 05:01 Rare for Covid Vaccine Injuries to be Designated “In Line of Duty” 06:52 Drew’s Story: COVID Vaccine Injury And Whole Body Paralysis (Guillain-Barré Syndrome) 08:30 Service Members Spend Down Savings, Retirement, And Mortgage Homes For Treatments 09:30 Dressen: Vaccine Injury Compensation Has a “98.5 %” Rejection Rate 12:50 Dressen: Service Members Report VA Experience “Abysmal Failure,” Reluctance to Acknowledge COVID Vaccine Injury 15:22 Is Trump Administration Taking Different Approach to COVID Vaccine Injury: More Dialogue 16:55 Bressen: I Was A “True Blue” Democrat, After COVID Shot “My Life Changed Forever” 18:20 Karoline Stancik Update 19:04 Update Drew Outstanding In response to our questions, a VA spokesperson said “Between December 2020 and December 2025, 53 cases of myocarditis were identified among over 5.6 million VHA-enrolled Veterans who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Veterans are eligible for service connection if myocarditis develops during active duty…” A Department of War official said DoW “is making reinstatement available to all members of the military (active and reserve components) who were discharged solely for refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and who request to be reinstated. The Department has reached out to the 8,700 Service members who were unjustly separated to apologize, offer information on reinstatement, and encourage them to rejoin the military.” “As of May 2026, more than 200 former Service members who were discharged under the now-rescinded COVID-19 vaccination mandate have been reinstated or re-accessed. The Services are actively tracking more than 800 additional former Service members who have expressed interest in rejoining the military.” Asked about the high rejection rate, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program did not respond.

BREAKING: Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Slams Biden-Era Military COVID Vaccine Mandate as Having “No Scientific Justification” This week on Straight to the Point, I sat down with former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield and Brianne Dressen — a vaccine injury advocate who was a clinical trial volunteer that developed lifelong neuropathy within one hour of taking the COVID-19 vaccine. Redfield exclusively reveals that he believes the Biden-era military mandates had “no scientific justification...and was an emotional decision," while noting institutional reluctance to acknowledge harms to young service members with strong immune systems. Dressen discusses the disproportionate toll the vaccine took on young service members, including Karolina Stancik who we previously interviewed. This wide ranging interview digs deep on the vaccine fallout for our nation's service members. LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios 01:04 Brianne Dressen: Her Advocacy for Covid Vaccine Injured is Personal React19 - Official 01:57 An “Inordinate Number” of Young Vaccine Injured Service Members 02:30 Former CDC Director Robert Redfield: Military COVID Vaccine Mandate “No Scientific Justification Whatsoever” 03:10 Most Severe Response In Young, With Robust Immune Systems 04:02 Soldier Karoline Stancik’s Heart Condition “Service Connected” To Covid Vaccine 05:01 Rare for Covid Vaccine Injuries to be Designated “In Line of Duty” 06:52 Drew’s Story: COVID Vaccine Injury And Whole Body Paralysis (Guillain-Barré Syndrome) 08:30 Service Members Spend Down Savings, Retirement, And Mortgage Homes For Treatments 09:30 Dressen: Vaccine Injury Compensation Has a “98.5 %” Rejection Rate 12:50 Dressen: Service Members Report VA Experience “Abysmal Failure,” Reluctance to Acknowledge COVID Vaccine Injury 15:22 Is Trump Administration Taking Different Approach to COVID Vaccine Injury: More Dialogue 16:55 Bressen: I Was A “True Blue” Democrat, After COVID Shot “My Life Changed Forever” 18:20 Karoline Stancik Update 19:04 Update Drew Outstanding In response to our questions, a VA spokesperson said “Between December 2020 and December 2025, 53 cases of myocarditis were identified among over 5.6 million VHA-enrolled Veterans who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Veterans are eligible for service connection if myocarditis develops during active duty…” A Department of War official said DoW “is making reinstatement available to all members of the military (active and reserve components) who were discharged solely for refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and who request to be reinstated. The Department has reached out to the 8,700 Service members who were unjustly separated to apologize, offer information on reinstatement, and encourage them to rejoin the military.” “As of May 2026, more than 200 former Service members who were discharged under the now-rescinded COVID-19 vaccination mandate have been reinstated or re-accessed. The Services are actively tracking more than 800 additional former Service members who have expressed interest in rejoining the military.” Asked about the high rejection rate, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program did not respond.

Catherine Herridge

1,226,295 次观看 • 2 个月前

CIA Director Ratcliffe: Agency Now Evaluating If China Intentionally Started Pandemic | The Daily Wire The new assessment from the agency was conducted at the end of the Biden administration. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said during an interview over the weekend that the world’s leading intelligence agency was now investigating whether the COVID-19 pandemic was an accident or if it was intentional. Ratcliffe made the remarks during a Sunday interview on “Sunday Morning Futures” while discussing his decision to release the findings from a new assessment that was conducted the Biden administration that concluded that the pandemic originated from a lab in Wuhan. Ratcliffe said that the reason that he released the intelligence was because it was important for Americans to regain trust in government institutions. “I had the opportunity on my first day to make public an assessment that actually took place in the Biden administration,” Ratcliffe said. “So it can’t be accused of being political, and it does assess, the CIA has assessed that the most likely cause of this pandemic that has wrought so much devastation around the world was because of a lab related incident in Wuhan, and so we’ll continue to investigate that moving forward.” When asked by host Maria Bartiromo if the CIA has concluded whether or not the lab leak was “intentional or accidental,” Ratcliffe responded: “I’m going to look closely at the intelligence that we’ve gathered.” Read more:

CIA Director Ratcliffe: Agency Now Evaluating If China Intentionally Started Pandemic | The Daily Wire The new assessment from the agency was conducted at the end of the Biden administration. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said during an interview over the weekend that the world’s leading intelligence agency was now investigating whether the COVID-19 pandemic was an accident or if it was intentional. Ratcliffe made the remarks during a Sunday interview on “Sunday Morning Futures” while discussing his decision to release the findings from a new assessment that was conducted the Biden administration that concluded that the pandemic originated from a lab in Wuhan. Ratcliffe said that the reason that he released the intelligence was because it was important for Americans to regain trust in government institutions. “I had the opportunity on my first day to make public an assessment that actually took place in the Biden administration,” Ratcliffe said. “So it can’t be accused of being political, and it does assess, the CIA has assessed that the most likely cause of this pandemic that has wrought so much devastation around the world was because of a lab related incident in Wuhan, and so we’ll continue to investigate that moving forward.” When asked by host Maria Bartiromo if the CIA has concluded whether or not the lab leak was “intentional or accidental,” Ratcliffe responded: “I’m going to look closely at the intelligence that we’ve gathered.” Read more:

Owen Gregorian

181,724 次观看 • 1 年前

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following: 1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory. 2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high. 3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures. Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season. 4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures. The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc. 5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH. 6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health. 7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs. After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.

The Researcher

89,349 次观看 • 6 个月前

I said I would give Pam Bondi a year to prove herself as an Attorney General who would dismantle the Deep State, let Americans see the truth, and finally bring to justice the criminal elites who have been “too big to jail.” Today, that year is up, and I haven’t seen evidence that she has done ANY of that. Bondi’s handling of the Epstein case was one of the worst fumbles I have ever seen. But we all remember that. What about the lack of prosecution against anyone who tried to weaponize the justice system against political opponents like Trump? Or the failure to prosecute the perpetrators of the Russiagate hoax like Clapper and Comey? That’s not weaponization. We’ve had the EVIDENCE for years that they lied and colluded with the press! Where are the prosecutions related to the Mar-a-Lago raid? We keep finding out that it was even WORSE than we were told, but NOTHING has happened yet? Can we get an update on any George Soros investigations? Why has it taken so long to go after him? Or how about investigating the Clintons for NON-Epstein related scandals: Gazprom? Uranium One? Benghazi? Hillary’s email server? Claims of fraud in Haiti? Anything the Clinton Foundation has touched?! How about the failure to drain the Swamp of Deep State actors working against the American people and their elected officials? Or the PROVEN lies from Capitol Police about Jan. 6? Or the FBI’s lies about the number of agents in the crowd? Or investigations into possible 2020 election fraud? Or follow-up on DOGE’s fraud findings? Sure, the DOJ is looking into the Somali fraudsters. But what about everyone in the banks, state government, and federal offices that HAD TO have known about the fraud?! What about Biden’s autopen scandal? Who signed off on everything if it wasn’t Biden? And the Biden administration was FULL of government weaponization worth prosecuting: the COVID lockdowns and vaccine mandates, the unjust FACE Act arrests, everything the Twitter Files exposed. Where is a SINGLE arrest? And speaking of COVID, what about investigations into AMERICA’S role in creating the virus and covering up its true origins? And dare I mention Fauci?

I said I would give Pam Bondi a year to prove herself as an Attorney General who would dismantle the Deep State, let Americans see the truth, and finally bring to justice the criminal elites who have been “too big to jail.” Today, that year is up, and I haven’t seen evidence that she has done ANY of that. Bondi’s handling of the Epstein case was one of the worst fumbles I have ever seen. But we all remember that. What about the lack of prosecution against anyone who tried to weaponize the justice system against political opponents like Trump? Or the failure to prosecute the perpetrators of the Russiagate hoax like Clapper and Comey? That’s not weaponization. We’ve had the EVIDENCE for years that they lied and colluded with the press! Where are the prosecutions related to the Mar-a-Lago raid? We keep finding out that it was even WORSE than we were told, but NOTHING has happened yet? Can we get an update on any George Soros investigations? Why has it taken so long to go after him? Or how about investigating the Clintons for NON-Epstein related scandals: Gazprom? Uranium One? Benghazi? Hillary’s email server? Claims of fraud in Haiti? Anything the Clinton Foundation has touched?! How about the failure to drain the Swamp of Deep State actors working against the American people and their elected officials? Or the PROVEN lies from Capitol Police about Jan. 6? Or the FBI’s lies about the number of agents in the crowd? Or investigations into possible 2020 election fraud? Or follow-up on DOGE’s fraud findings? Sure, the DOJ is looking into the Somali fraudsters. But what about everyone in the banks, state government, and federal offices that HAD TO have known about the fraud?! What about Biden’s autopen scandal? Who signed off on everything if it wasn’t Biden? And the Biden administration was FULL of government weaponization worth prosecuting: the COVID lockdowns and vaccine mandates, the unjust FACE Act arrests, everything the Twitter Files exposed. Where is a SINGLE arrest? And speaking of COVID, what about investigations into AMERICA’S role in creating the virus and covering up its true origins? And dare I mention Fauci?

Glenn Beck

965,370 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨THREAD: Mike Benz speaks with Tucker Carlson about the Department of Homeland Security-backed censorship consortium that censored millions of social media posts during the 2020 election and COVID-19. The 2020 election and COVID-19 were the two most censored events in American history. Mike Benz outlines how the government established a permanent domestic censorship office under the pretext of countering misinformation. and disinformation. Initially considered for the State Department, CIA, and FBI, the censorship office found its home in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), utilizing the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). DHS classified elections as critical infrastructure and online misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as cybersecurity attacks. The original goal of countering Russian disinformation shifted to suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump. Examining the 2020 election's censorship strategy, Benz details CISA's collaboration with Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Council through the Election Integrity Partnership. The censorship consortium employed coercive tactics, leveraging its deputized status to pressure tech companies through government threats. A critical element was the seven-month pre-censorship campaign before the 2020 election. The consortium compelled social media companies to introduce a new "delegitimization" violation, targeting content challenging faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes. The overarching goal was narrative control, preventing doubts about a Biden victory and avoiding a crisis akin to the 2000 Bush-Gore election. Anticipating Biden's victory hinging on mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot dropboxes, the consortium precensored any questioning of the election's legitimacy, particularly if Trump appeared to win on election night but later lost due to late-arriving mail-in ballots. The so-called "Red Mirage-Blue Shift event." The thread continues below.👇

🚨THREAD: Mike Benz speaks with Tucker Carlson about the Department of Homeland Security-backed censorship consortium that censored millions of social media posts during the 2020 election and COVID-19. The 2020 election and COVID-19 were the two most censored events in American history. Mike Benz outlines how the government established a permanent domestic censorship office under the pretext of countering misinformation. and disinformation. Initially considered for the State Department, CIA, and FBI, the censorship office found its home in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), utilizing the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). DHS classified elections as critical infrastructure and online misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as cybersecurity attacks. The original goal of countering Russian disinformation shifted to suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump. Examining the 2020 election's censorship strategy, Benz details CISA's collaboration with Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Council through the Election Integrity Partnership. The censorship consortium employed coercive tactics, leveraging its deputized status to pressure tech companies through government threats. A critical element was the seven-month pre-censorship campaign before the 2020 election. The consortium compelled social media companies to introduce a new "delegitimization" violation, targeting content challenging faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes. The overarching goal was narrative control, preventing doubts about a Biden victory and avoiding a crisis akin to the 2000 Bush-Gore election. Anticipating Biden's victory hinging on mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot dropboxes, the consortium precensored any questioning of the election's legitimacy, particularly if Trump appeared to win on election night but later lost due to late-arriving mail-in ballots. The so-called "Red Mirage-Blue Shift event." The thread continues below.👇

KanekoaTheGreat

807,302 次观看 • 2 年前

Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy. The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies. Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data. One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations. The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals. Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made. The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented. Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety profile. Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked? The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies. The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.

Rebel News

125,819 次观看 • 1 年前

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith describes waking up to the "vaccine" fraud: "[The] lab where I worked... everybody was saying... you get the flu from the flu shot... [then] when [the Covid jabs] came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before... [And] they were getting Covid-19 immediately after getting the shot." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "I started to wake up during really, when they started declaring two weeks to flatten the curve, and I started seeing people wearing masks in public. I knew this was not a pandemic, and there was something, some kind of psychological operation going on because I had worked in the hospital for the swine flu scare, and it wasn't a thing in the hospital. It was just regular flu. I've even talked to, people that were on the front lines, like ER doctors and nurses, and they said— Some of them even said that they got it, and it wasn't that big of a deal. "When they declared Covid, I was really suspicious. This is just going to be another vaccination campaign because they already had mandates for the flu shot for health care workers for, like, a decade before that. And I had been doing the exemption every year. And the reason I did that is because the first year that they made health care workers get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. And so that was the year that we came up with the— It was just a rumor within the university lab where I worked, but everybody was saying it, that you get the flu from the flu shot. "Ever since then, I just didn't want to do it. So during that whole year of Operation Warp Speed, the only thing that's going to get us back to normal is this vaccine. I thought this— If the flu shot never worked, the chances that the COVID shot is going to work is slim to nil. And the amount of pressure for this one compared to the flu shot is astronomical. So there's something to it. So that made me actually not just look at the COVID shot, but look at all the other vaccines. "What I learned was they don't teach coders or doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects, despite the fact that they have, codes to assign for vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with, like, Guillain Barre before this, and the doctors would try very hard not to relate it to a vaccine. "There would be codes in there, like adverse effect of flu shot or adverse effect of whatever. And those are supposed to be, like a safety signal code, like one of the reasons why the ICD10 system, which is owned by the WHO, by the way, so every. Every member state that is part of the WHO has to report these codes. And it's for statistical monitoring purposes. "This is how they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world, or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system that they use. And it's also supposed to be used, starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look for a safety signal. So I thought with this COVID-19 vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect of this shot, and it should be my job to assign it. "I did my due diligence and I looked into all the warnings and what could happen if people got the shot. And then I looked at what could happen if people got the other vaccines. And I started to realize that they had been burying all of the effects that people would get from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up until 2020. "Then when the COVID-19 vaccine came out, there was no code to report it. So it should have been my job to collect that danger signal. And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Gets Red Pilled, was just a radio show, in early 2021, right after I quit my job. And I said the COVID-19 vaccine is more dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined. And that was with my— That was just an observation, but it was 10 years of medical coding experience and then learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and all the cases that I saw of children in the ER constantly having eczema or rashes or even anaphylactic responses. And then I look at the record, they just got a vaccine, but the doctor's not connecting the two. "So when COVID-19 came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before. Myocarditis. They were getting COVID-19 immediately after getting the shot, like the same day or the next day, and then being hospitalized. There are people with paralytic problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders, where they couldn't even figure out what was going on because the patient was clotting and bleeding at the same time and they didn't even know how to treat it. Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four months of the vaccine rollout."

Former medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith describes waking up to the "vaccine" fraud: "[The] lab where I worked... everybody was saying... you get the flu from the flu shot... [then] when [the Covid jabs] came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before... [And] they were getting Covid-19 immediately after getting the shot." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from an interview with David Knight (David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F) posted to Rumble on November 13, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "I started to wake up during really, when they started declaring two weeks to flatten the curve, and I started seeing people wearing masks in public. I knew this was not a pandemic, and there was something, some kind of psychological operation going on because I had worked in the hospital for the swine flu scare, and it wasn't a thing in the hospital. It was just regular flu. I've even talked to, people that were on the front lines, like ER doctors and nurses, and they said— Some of them even said that they got it, and it wasn't that big of a deal. "When they declared Covid, I was really suspicious. This is just going to be another vaccination campaign because they already had mandates for the flu shot for health care workers for, like, a decade before that. And I had been doing the exemption every year. And the reason I did that is because the first year that they made health care workers get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. And so that was the year that we came up with the— It was just a rumor within the university lab where I worked, but everybody was saying it, that you get the flu from the flu shot. "Ever since then, I just didn't want to do it. So during that whole year of Operation Warp Speed, the only thing that's going to get us back to normal is this vaccine. I thought this— If the flu shot never worked, the chances that the COVID shot is going to work is slim to nil. And the amount of pressure for this one compared to the flu shot is astronomical. So there's something to it. So that made me actually not just look at the COVID shot, but look at all the other vaccines. "What I learned was they don't teach coders or doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects, despite the fact that they have, codes to assign for vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with, like, Guillain Barre before this, and the doctors would try very hard not to relate it to a vaccine. "There would be codes in there, like adverse effect of flu shot or adverse effect of whatever. And those are supposed to be, like a safety signal code, like one of the reasons why the ICD10 system, which is owned by the WHO, by the way, so every. Every member state that is part of the WHO has to report these codes. And it's for statistical monitoring purposes. "This is how they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world, or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system that they use. And it's also supposed to be used, starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look for a safety signal. So I thought with this COVID-19 vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect of this shot, and it should be my job to assign it. "I did my due diligence and I looked into all the warnings and what could happen if people got the shot. And then I looked at what could happen if people got the other vaccines. And I started to realize that they had been burying all of the effects that people would get from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up until 2020. "Then when the COVID-19 vaccine came out, there was no code to report it. So it should have been my job to collect that danger signal. And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Gets Red Pilled, was just a radio show, in early 2021, right after I quit my job. And I said the COVID-19 vaccine is more dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined. And that was with my— That was just an observation, but it was 10 years of medical coding experience and then learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and all the cases that I saw of children in the ER constantly having eczema or rashes or even anaphylactic responses. And then I look at the record, they just got a vaccine, but the doctor's not connecting the two. "So when COVID-19 came out, people were having strokes and encephalitis and blood clots like I've never seen before. Myocarditis. They were getting COVID-19 immediately after getting the shot, like the same day or the next day, and then being hospitalized. There are people with paralytic problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders, where they couldn't even figure out what was going on because the patient was clotting and bleeding at the same time and they didn't even know how to treat it. Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four months of the vaccine rollout."

Sense Receptor

25,813 次观看 • 9 个月前

Top-Tier Journal Confirms Mechanism of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Heart Damage The conversation around vaccines is shifting, with HHS emphasizing informed consent over mandates. This new approach is having a direct market impact, with recent reports showing Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine sales tumbling. The reason? The public is increasingly examining the science. A landmark study published in Circulation, the flagship journal of the American Heart Association and a top-tier cardiovascular publication, has delivered a critical finding. The research identifies the precise mechanism behind myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination. Here is the breakdown in plain English: The study reveals that in certain susceptible individuals, the immune system's T cells—trained by the vaccine to attack the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—also mistakenly attack similar-looking proteins in heart tissue. This phenomenon, known as "molecular mimicry," means the body's defenses cannot reliably distinguish the virus from the heart itself, leading to an autoimmune attack on the cardiac muscle. Crucially, the study found this specific, expanded immune response in patients with post-vaccine myopericarditis, but not in those who had developed myocarditis from a natural COVID-19 infection. The implications are profound. This is no longer a debate based on epidemiological signals or VAERS data. A leading mainstream medical journal has published a study pinpointing a direct autoimmune mechanism for vaccine-induced heart damage that is distinct from the damage caused by the virus. With this level of evidence now in the public domain, the call for a science-driven reassessment of vaccine policies has never been stronger. The argument has moved from the fringe to the forefront of established medical literature. The question now is: What will it take for health authorities to officially acknowledge these findings and adjust their recommendations accordingly?

Top-Tier Journal Confirms Mechanism of COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Heart Damage The conversation around vaccines is shifting, with HHS emphasizing informed consent over mandates. This new approach is having a direct market impact, with recent reports showing Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine sales tumbling. The reason? The public is increasingly examining the science. A landmark study published in Circulation, the flagship journal of the American Heart Association and a top-tier cardiovascular publication, has delivered a critical finding. The research identifies the precise mechanism behind myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination. Here is the breakdown in plain English: The study reveals that in certain susceptible individuals, the immune system's T cells—trained by the vaccine to attack the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—also mistakenly attack similar-looking proteins in heart tissue. This phenomenon, known as "molecular mimicry," means the body's defenses cannot reliably distinguish the virus from the heart itself, leading to an autoimmune attack on the cardiac muscle. Crucially, the study found this specific, expanded immune response in patients with post-vaccine myopericarditis, but not in those who had developed myocarditis from a natural COVID-19 infection. The implications are profound. This is no longer a debate based on epidemiological signals or VAERS data. A leading mainstream medical journal has published a study pinpointing a direct autoimmune mechanism for vaccine-induced heart damage that is distinct from the damage caused by the virus. With this level of evidence now in the public domain, the call for a science-driven reassessment of vaccine policies has never been stronger. The argument has moved from the fringe to the forefront of established medical literature. The question now is: What will it take for health authorities to officially acknowledge these findings and adjust their recommendations accordingly?

Camus

12,300 次观看 • 9 个月前

90% Inaccurate: Bombshell German Study Exposes the PCR Test Fraud That Locked Down the World A seismic new study out of Germany has just dropped a truth bomb on the entire COVID-19 narrative, and the implications are staggering. Remember the PCR tests? The ones that decided if you were locked down, forced into a quarantine hotel, or stripped of your freedoms? They were the cornerstone of the global pandemic response. Now, a major analysis of Germany's lab data—representing 90% of all tests—has conducted a simple, devastating check. They compared PCR "positive" results with actual blood tests for IgG antibodies to see who was truly infected. The finding is jaw-dropping: Only 10-14% of people who tested positive on a PCR test actually had antibodies proving a real infection. That means the tests were up to 90% INACCURATE. For every 10 "cases" reported, only 1 was likely real. This confirms what many warned about in 2020: inflated cycle thresholds (Ct) were creating a pandemic of false positives. A separate paper at the time stated that at 35 cycles, the false positive rate was 97%. They had the antibody data all along. They could have calibrated the tests and stopped the fear cycle. Instead, they chose to run millions of flawed tests, terrorizing the population with case numbers they knew were scientifically meaningless. Think of the consequences: ✅ Lockdowns based on false data. ✅ School closures over phantom cases. ✅ Vaccine mandates for a threat that was wildly overstated. And the ultimate irony? The one place you were guaranteed not to get a PCR test was in the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. They never tested participants to see if the vaccine actually stopped infection or transmission. The "science" we were told to "trust" wasn't just wrong—it was a catastrophic failure that collapsed the world economy and stripped us of our civil liberties. This isn't just a revelation. It's an indictment.

90% Inaccurate: Bombshell German Study Exposes the PCR Test Fraud That Locked Down the World A seismic new study out of Germany has just dropped a truth bomb on the entire COVID-19 narrative, and the implications are staggering. Remember the PCR tests? The ones that decided if you were locked down, forced into a quarantine hotel, or stripped of your freedoms? They were the cornerstone of the global pandemic response. Now, a major analysis of Germany's lab data—representing 90% of all tests—has conducted a simple, devastating check. They compared PCR "positive" results with actual blood tests for IgG antibodies to see who was truly infected. The finding is jaw-dropping: Only 10-14% of people who tested positive on a PCR test actually had antibodies proving a real infection. That means the tests were up to 90% INACCURATE. For every 10 "cases" reported, only 1 was likely real. This confirms what many warned about in 2020: inflated cycle thresholds (Ct) were creating a pandemic of false positives. A separate paper at the time stated that at 35 cycles, the false positive rate was 97%. They had the antibody data all along. They could have calibrated the tests and stopped the fear cycle. Instead, they chose to run millions of flawed tests, terrorizing the population with case numbers they knew were scientifically meaningless. Think of the consequences: ✅ Lockdowns based on false data. ✅ School closures over phantom cases. ✅ Vaccine mandates for a threat that was wildly overstated. And the ultimate irony? The one place you were guaranteed not to get a PCR test was in the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. They never tested participants to see if the vaccine actually stopped infection or transmission. The "science" we were told to "trust" wasn't just wrong—it was a catastrophic failure that collapsed the world economy and stripped us of our civil liberties. This isn't just a revelation. It's an indictment.

Camus

240,456 次观看 • 9 个月前