正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Circular citations create manufactured consent with real consequences. So the next time someone spews the B.S. line, “every major medical association supports gender affirming care” show them this.

25,830 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In the fall of 2022, Jon Stewart had an argument with the Attorney General of Arkansas about that state’s ban on using drugs and surgeries in an effort to change the gender of children and adolescents. “You’re suggesting that protecting children means overriding the recommendations of the American Medical Association, the American Association of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society,” said Stewart. And he was right: those major medical organizations had indeed endorsed what’s called gender-affirming care. But the attorney general of Arkansas was also right when she said there was never sufficient evidence for them to do so. It’s true that gender dysphoria and gender distress are indeed serious psychological and psychiatric problems. But there has long been strong evidence that other things, including autism, anxiety, and just being gay, are being misdiagnosed by children, parents, therapists, and doctors as gender dysphoria. And now there are the newly released internal discussions from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health, known as WPATH. They show that trans activists aggressively pressure doctors and therapists for the medicalization of gender dysphoria with drugs and surgeries before first attempting to address autism, anxiety, and other psychiatric disorders. The question now turns to why the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society advocated drugs and surgery for gender distress despite the lack of evidence. There’s a short and a longer answer to that question....

Michael Shellenberger

753,628 次观看 • 2 年前