Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Claude Code 2.1.257 has been released. 104 CLI changes Highlights: • Default Fable model set to Claude Fable 5.1 (1M context); billing now $10/$50 per Mtok, $0.25/Mtok cache reads • Auto mode prompts once before the first file read outside working directories, with an option to block reads •... show more

Claude Code Changelog

83,775 subscribers

74,846 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Ryven

36,121 views • 21 days ago

This is f*cking insane. This tip saved me thousands of dollars. run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, and stop burning Opus on work it was never needed for. the whole idea in one line: the strong model plans, the mid-tier model executes, Fable stays quiet until it's actually needed. roles, broken down: Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the plan and ships the final code Sonnet 5.5, medium effort, splits into explorer (reads the codebase), worker (edits files, runs tests), researcher (pulls docs) Fable 5.1, called through /advisor fable, reads everything happening in the session but stays silent unless something's actually wrong three moments where Fable speaks: → a plan goes out: is this actually the right call? → the same failure shows up again: is the search going nowhere? → the task gets marked finished: did something get skipped? Jev engineering does the same thing one level down. the forks that don't need real thought, which file, which tool, keep going or stop, go straight to Jev and come back in under half a second. the big models only ever see the forks that genuinely need a decision. anyone still running one model for everything is paying Opus prices to decide whether a file exists. drop this into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this structure: Look through ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents already covering explorer, worker, and researcher. Only create new ones for roles that are missing. Set model: sonnet, effort: medium on each. If an existing subagent is locked to a different model, leave it as is and just list it. In ~/.claude/settings.json, set effortLevel to high and advisorModel to fable. Check for anything disabling the advisor, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, or anything blocking feature-flag fetches, plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which can override subagent effort settings. Report what you find. Don't change any of it yet. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check in with the advisor before a big plan, when the same error shows up twice, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Wait for my go-ahead before touching anything."

This is f*cking insane. This tip saved me thousands of dollars. run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, and stop burning Opus on work it was never needed for. the whole idea in one line: the strong model plans, the mid-tier model executes, Fable stays quiet until it's actually needed. roles, broken down: Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the plan and ships the final code Sonnet 5.5, medium effort, splits into explorer (reads the codebase), worker (edits files, runs tests), researcher (pulls docs) Fable 5.1, called through /advisor fable, reads everything happening in the session but stays silent unless something's actually wrong three moments where Fable speaks: → a plan goes out: is this actually the right call? → the same failure shows up again: is the search going nowhere? → the task gets marked finished: did something get skipped? Jev engineering does the same thing one level down. the forks that don't need real thought, which file, which tool, keep going or stop, go straight to Jev and come back in under half a second. the big models only ever see the forks that genuinely need a decision. anyone still running one model for everything is paying Opus prices to decide whether a file exists. drop this into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this structure: Look through ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents already covering explorer, worker, and researcher. Only create new ones for roles that are missing. Set model: sonnet, effort: medium on each. If an existing subagent is locked to a different model, leave it as is and just list it. In ~/.claude/settings.json, set effortLevel to high and advisorModel to fable. Check for anything disabling the advisor, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, or anything blocking feature-flag fetches, plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which can override subagent effort settings. Report what you find. Don't change any of it yet. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check in with the advisor before a big plan, when the same error shows up twice, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Wait for my go-ahead before touching anything."

rvaniaaa

254,273 views • 20 days ago

Claude Fable 5 + Claude Design is f*cking insane 🤯 Anthropic just dropped its most intelligent model ever, and the first thing I pointed it at was email design. I built a complete email campaign design in Claude Design, and the difference is night and day: tighter layouts, cleaner hierarchy, on-brand from the first generation. All inside Claude Design with Fable 5. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month for campaign designs that take 2 weeks to ship. If your campaign calendar is packed but every new email means briefing a designer, waiting on mockups, sending notes, and waiting again... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Load your brand design system into Claude Design once (colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Switch the model to Claude Fable 5 — Anthropic's new state-of-the-art model with the best vision of any AI → Prompt the campaign email section by section: header, hero, headline, offer block, CTA → Fable 5 nails layout and brand details that older models fumbled → Iterate inline — swap images, adjust styling, color-pick directly in the canvas → Export the finished email and hand off to your ESP No briefing a designer. No 2-week turnaround on a single campaign. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Campaign emails designed in minutes, not weeks → A reusable design system every new email pulls from automatically → Noticeably smarter design decisions from Fable 5's upgraded vision → Full inline editing before anything touches your ESP Built 100% with Claude Design + Claude Fable 5. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "FABLE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

43,454 views • 4 months ago

if you use claude code, this will save you real money. the problem: every time you make an edit, your ai rereads the whole codebase to figure out what changed. tens of thousands of tokens, every turn, for context it already had. this repo fixes it. it’s called code review graph, and it just maps your entire codebase: every file, every function, every connection laid out so you can see the actual shape of your project how to set up (2 min): 1. pip install code-review-graph 2. code-review-graph install - auto-configures Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI + more 3. code-review-graph build change one function, and it traces exactly what that touches... every caller, every dependent file, every test. your ai only reads what's affected, not the whole repo. and the savings are wild. a task that used to burn ~100,000 tokens (about a dollar) now runs closer to a penny.

if you use claude code, this will save you real money. the problem: every time you make an edit, your ai rereads the whole codebase to figure out what changed. tens of thousands of tokens, every turn, for context it already had. this repo fixes it. it’s called code review graph, and it just maps your entire codebase: every file, every function, every connection laid out so you can see the actual shape of your project how to set up (2 min): 1. pip install code-review-graph 2. code-review-graph install - auto-configures Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI + more 3. code-review-graph build change one function, and it traces exactly what that touches... every caller, every dependent file, every test. your ai only reads what's affected, not the whole repo. and the savings are wild. a task that used to burn ~100,000 tokens (about a dollar) now runs closer to a penny.

Alvaro Cintas

75,596 views • 2 months ago

your AI agent can watch any video now - paste a URL and it sees every frame, hears every word, all for free 🤯 bradautomates/claude-video gives Claude the ability to watch YouTube, Loom, TikTok, local files - anything yt-dlp supports what people actually use it for: → analyze a competitor launch - what hook, what visuals, what structure → debug from a screen recording - Claude reads the exact frame where it breaks → summarize a 49-min talk in 30 seconds with frame-accurate timestamps → strip the hype from product videos - "what's actually new, skip the pitch" the mechanism: yt-dlp pulls free captions first (zero cost). ffmpeg extracts frames at scene-aware intervals - not uniform sampling, so you don't waste tokens on 12 identical frames of the same slide. Claude reads every frame as an image with timestamp markers. Groq Whisper only kicks in when a video has no caption track how to set up (3 min): > claude code: /plugin marketplace add bradautomates/claude-video then /plugin install watch@claude-video > or npx skills add bradautomates/claude-video -g for codex, cursor, gemini cli > dependencies auto-install on macOS via brew two caveats: free captions cover most but not all videos. past 10 min use --start/--end for focused sections or the token-burner mode for full coverage your buddy still watches every tutorial at 2x speed taking manual notes. you paste a URL and your agent extracts the substance in seconds for $0

your AI agent can watch any video now - paste a URL and it sees every frame, hears every word, all for free 🤯 bradautomates/claude-video gives Claude the ability to watch YouTube, Loom, TikTok, local files - anything yt-dlp supports what people actually use it for: → analyze a competitor launch - what hook, what visuals, what structure → debug from a screen recording - Claude reads the exact frame where it breaks → summarize a 49-min talk in 30 seconds with frame-accurate timestamps → strip the hype from product videos - "what's actually new, skip the pitch" the mechanism: yt-dlp pulls free captions first (zero cost). ffmpeg extracts frames at scene-aware intervals - not uniform sampling, so you don't waste tokens on 12 identical frames of the same slide. Claude reads every frame as an image with timestamp markers. Groq Whisper only kicks in when a video has no caption track how to set up (3 min): > claude code: /plugin marketplace add bradautomates/claude-video then /plugin install watch@claude-video > or npx skills add bradautomates/claude-video -g for codex, cursor, gemini cli > dependencies auto-install on macOS via brew two caveats: free captions cover most but not all videos. past 10 min use --start/--end for focused sections or the token-burner mode for full coverage your buddy still watches every tutorial at 2x speed taking manual notes. you paste a URL and your agent extracts the substance in seconds for $0

Alvaro Cintas

311,088 views • 2 months ago

Claude cannot watch a YouTube video, Instagram reel, Tiktok, or local file video. Same problem is with ChatGPT and Gemini. It reads the transcript and pretends it did. This FREE AI TOOL fixes this issue It extracts only the important frames, transcribes the audio, and hands Claude a clean folder it can genuinely read and understand. No uploading to a server. Runs entirely on your machine. Here is what makes it smarter than everything else doing this: → Detects scene changes instead of grabbing one frame per second like every other tool → Removes near-duplicate frames so Claude is not reading the same shot 40 times → Handles A-B-A cuts, if a shot already appeared, it does not send it again → A 10-minute static screencast collapses to 1 frame instead of 600 → A fast-cut reel catches every visual change instead of missing frames between samples → Transcribes audio with Whisper and auto-detects the language → Saves the full soundtrack so audio models can actually hear it too → Works with Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini The result: fewer frames, cheaper context, better understanding. Claude actually sees the video instead of guessing from a transcript.

Claude cannot watch a YouTube video, Instagram reel, Tiktok, or local file video. Same problem is with ChatGPT and Gemini. It reads the transcript and pretends it did. This FREE AI TOOL fixes this issue It extracts only the important frames, transcribes the audio, and hands Claude a clean folder it can genuinely read and understand. No uploading to a server. Runs entirely on your machine. Here is what makes it smarter than everything else doing this: → Detects scene changes instead of grabbing one frame per second like every other tool → Removes near-duplicate frames so Claude is not reading the same shot 40 times → Handles A-B-A cuts, if a shot already appeared, it does not send it again → A 10-minute static screencast collapses to 1 frame instead of 600 → A fast-cut reel catches every visual change instead of missing frames between samples → Transcribes audio with Whisper and auto-detects the language → Saves the full soundtrack so audio models can actually hear it too → Works with Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini The result: fewer frames, cheaper context, better understanding. Claude actually sees the video instead of guessing from a transcript.

Kanika

22,770 views • 3 months ago

HERMES AGENT NOW RUNS CLAUDE OPUS 5. NEAR FABLE 5 INTELLIGENCE. HALF THE PRICE. SELF-VERIFIES ITS OWN WORK. AVAILABLE TODAY VIA NOUS PORTAL (20% OFF ALL MODELS). Anthropic shipped Opus 5 on July 24, 2026. same $5/$25 per million tokens as Opus 4.8. but the benchmarks tell a different story. WHAT CHANGED FROM OPUS 4.8: FrontierBench v0.1: Opus 5: 43.3%. Opus 4.8: 18.7%. 2.3x jump on the same test. ARC-AGI-3: Opus 5: 30.2%. 3x better than the next closest model. beat Fable 5 on 8 out of 13 benchmarks. at half the cost ($5/$25 vs $10/$50). same price as Opus 4.8. twice the intelligence. no reason to stay on 4.8. THE SPECS: model ID: claude-opus-5 context: 1M tokens (default and maximum) max output: 128K tokens thinking: on by default effort toggle: low / medium / high per request fast mode: $10/$50, 2.5x faster knowledge cutoff: May 2026 minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens (was 1,024) SELF-VERIFICATION (the biggest change): Opus 5 checks its own work automatically. Anthropic says: delete your verification prompts. "include a final verification step" now causes OVER-verification because the model already does it. for Hermes /goal tasks this is a direct upgrade. the judge checks evidence. the model also checks evidence. double layer of verification without extra tokens. EFFORT TOGGLE: low: fast, cheap, routine work. medium: balanced, daily tasks. high: full reasoning, complex problems. set per request. not a global switch. matches Hermes /reasoning command: /reasoning low (routine) /reasoning high (complex) Opus 5 effort toggle + Hermes reasoning control = precise cost management per turn. WHERE OPUS 5 FITS IN HERMES: DAILY DRIVER (replaces Opus 4.8): same price. 2.3x better benchmarks. set as your main model: Desktop app / Dashboard: Models → claude-opus-5 CHIEF OF STAFF: synthesis across multiple agents. reads Kanban, prioritizes, routes tasks. self-verification catches routing errors before they cascade. COMPLEX CODING: SOTA on agentic coding benchmarks. FrontierBench 43.3% = best public model for coding. set as coder profile model. /GOAL TASKS: self-verification + completion contracts = the model proves its work AND double-checks the proof. long-horizon goals finish correctly more often. MoA AGGREGATOR: strongest synthesis model at $5/$25. pair with GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 as references. Opus 5 aggregates. best quality at mid-range price. presets: max-quality: reference_models: - provider: openai-codex model: gpt-5.6-sol - provider: xai model: grok-4.5 aggregator: provider: anthropic model: claude-opus-5 COMPUTER USE: near-Fable 5 quality for browser automation. at half the token cost per session. computer_use tasks burn lots of vision tokens. Opus 5 halves that bill vs Fable 5. WHAT TO KEEP OPUS 5 AWAY FROM: cron monitoring: too expensive. use DeepSeek or no_agent mode. sub-agent grunt work: use GPT-5.6 Luna ($1/$6) or DeepSeek. auxiliary tasks: use Gemini Flash. routine web extraction: use a cheap model. Opus 5 is for the turns where quality compounds. planning, synthesis, verification, complex reasoning. budget models handle everything else. NOUS PORTAL: 20% OFF ALL MODELS Nous Portal currently runs a 20% discount on all models including Opus 5. $5/$25 official → $4/$20 through Nous Portal. the cheapest way to run Opus 5 right now. hermes setup --portal select claude-opus-5 as your model. discount applies automatically. Opus 5 replaces Opus 4.8 everywhere. same price. better at everything. no tradeoff. straight upgrade. hermes update /model claude-opus-5

YanXbt

16,744 views • 3 months ago

THIS IS F*CKING BRILLIANT. Anthropic’s docs describe one of the smartest ways to run Opus three models work on one task and each does only the part it’s cheapest at. start Claude Code like this: claude -> model sonnet -> advisor opus you stop paying Opus prices for work that doesn’t need Opus > Sonnet runs the session and edits the code > Haiku 5.5 searches the repo and docs, at up to 40x less per token than Opus 5.5 > Opus waits as the advisor and reads the whole session, tool calls included Claude usually calls Opus at three points: > before it locks a plan > when the same error comes back > right before it says it’s done Sonnet drives. Haiku scouts. Opus signs off and if you go one step lower, most of an agent’s day is tiny choices like picking a file or a tool, or deciding whether to retry. Jev takes those first, so Sonnet and Opus only see the moments that are really open the whole setup Sonnet runs the main session Explore on Haiku 5.5 searches and pulls docs, read-only Opus on call as the advisor give Claude Code this setup and the prompt below ↓ “Set up my Claude Code exactly like this: Main model Sonnet, advisor Opus, saved as advisorModel in my settings. One read-only subagent named exactly Explore, on claude-haiku-5-5, to replace the built-in one. One line in CLAUDE.md: ask the advisor before locking a plan, after the same error twice, and before calling a task done, not more often. Check what could turn the advisor off (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY) and only report it. Show every change as a diff first. Don’t edit anything until I say go.” before you turn it on: every advisor call re-reads the whole transcript with no cache. on a 200k session that’s about $0.80 in input, against $0.04 for a normal request. keep it to a few calls the built-in Explore agent runs on your main model unless a subagent is named exactly Explore. any other name does nothing turning the advisor on or off keeps your prompt cache. switching models rebuilds it it needs the Anthropic API, and it stays off if telemetry is disabled bookmark it before your next long session

THIS IS F*CKING BRILLIANT. Anthropic’s docs describe one of the smartest ways to run Opus three models work on one task and each does only the part it’s cheapest at. start Claude Code like this: claude -> model sonnet -> advisor opus you stop paying Opus prices for work that doesn’t need Opus > Sonnet runs the session and edits the code > Haiku 5.5 searches the repo and docs, at up to 40x less per token than Opus 5.5 > Opus waits as the advisor and reads the whole session, tool calls included Claude usually calls Opus at three points: > before it locks a plan > when the same error comes back > right before it says it’s done Sonnet drives. Haiku scouts. Opus signs off and if you go one step lower, most of an agent’s day is tiny choices like picking a file or a tool, or deciding whether to retry. Jev takes those first, so Sonnet and Opus only see the moments that are really open the whole setup Sonnet runs the main session Explore on Haiku 5.5 searches and pulls docs, read-only Opus on call as the advisor give Claude Code this setup and the prompt below ↓ “Set up my Claude Code exactly like this: Main model Sonnet, advisor Opus, saved as advisorModel in my settings. One read-only subagent named exactly Explore, on claude-haiku-5-5, to replace the built-in one. One line in CLAUDE.md: ask the advisor before locking a plan, after the same error twice, and before calling a task done, not more often. Check what could turn the advisor off (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY) and only report it. Show every change as a diff first. Don’t edit anything until I say go.” before you turn it on: every advisor call re-reads the whole transcript with no cache. on a 200k session that’s about $0.80 in input, against $0.04 for a normal request. keep it to a few calls the built-in Explore agent runs on your main model unless a subagent is named exactly Explore. any other name does nothing turning the advisor on or off keeps your prompt cache. switching models rebuilds it it needs the Anthropic API, and it stays off if telemetry is disabled bookmark it before your next long session

rvaniaaa

62,223 views • 10 days ago

Introducing a new tool called "SideChannel". A secure alternative to OpenClaw. Utilizes signal for communication and has Claude integration. I built SideChannel, an open-source Signal bot that connects Claude AI to your entire development workflow. End-to-end encrypted. From your pocket. The real power is autonomous development. Send one message like "Build a REST API with auth, pagination, and tests" and SideChannel will: - Generate a full PRD with stories and atomic tasks. - Dispatch up to 10 parallel workers (each running Claude). - Independently verify every task with a separate Claude context. - Run quality gates to catch regressions - Auto-fix failures. - Send you progress updates via Signal as work completes. Every piece of code is reviewed by a separate AI context using a fail-closed security model. If it detects security issues, backdoors, or logic errors — the code gets rejected automatically. No rubber stamps. It also has memory that actually works. Conversations are stored with vector embeddings for semantic search. Claude remembers your project conventions, past decisions, and what's been tried before. It gets smarter about your codebase over time. Other things I'm proud of: - Plugin framework for extending with custom commands. - Multi-project support with per-user scoping. - Rate limiting, path validation, phone allowlist. - Git checkpoints before every task, atomic commits after. - Stale task recovery, circular dependency detection. - Works on Linux and macOS, one-command install. It also integrates into OpenAI or Grok (optional) for more Generative AI response for simple things like "Whats the weather in New York City right now?".

Introducing a new tool called "SideChannel". A secure alternative to OpenClaw. Utilizes signal for communication and has Claude integration. I built SideChannel, an open-source Signal bot that connects Claude AI to your entire development workflow. End-to-end encrypted. From your pocket. The real power is autonomous development. Send one message like "Build a REST API with auth, pagination, and tests" and SideChannel will: - Generate a full PRD with stories and atomic tasks. - Dispatch up to 10 parallel workers (each running Claude). - Independently verify every task with a separate Claude context. - Run quality gates to catch regressions - Auto-fix failures. - Send you progress updates via Signal as work completes. Every piece of code is reviewed by a separate AI context using a fail-closed security model. If it detects security issues, backdoors, or logic errors — the code gets rejected automatically. No rubber stamps. It also has memory that actually works. Conversations are stored with vector embeddings for semantic search. Claude remembers your project conventions, past decisions, and what's been tried before. It gets smarter about your codebase over time. Other things I'm proud of: - Plugin framework for extending with custom commands. - Multi-project support with per-user scoping. - Rate limiting, path validation, phone allowlist. - Git checkpoints before every task, atomic commits after. - Stale task recovery, circular dependency detection. - Works on Linux and macOS, one-command install. It also integrates into OpenAI or Grok (optional) for more Generative AI response for simple things like "Whats the weather in New York City right now?".

Dave Kennedy

49,607 views • 8 months ago

THIS IS THE MOST F*CKING AWESOME USE OF GROK BOTS ON THE PLANET. 4 GROK AI DEBATE WHETHER TO BUY A COIN. VOTE. 5TH ONE ROASTS YOUR PORTFOLIO repo: gemsearch grok council 4 grok bots with ai avatars receive a coin address, each has its own role: > lookout reads what x says about the coin, picks up sentiment, catches hype and fud > skeptic checks bundles, funders and wallet links, looks for crew patterns > builder opens the site, reads the code, checks if there is a real product or an empty shell > timing checks liquidity, volume, holders, price trend and entry moment each one speaks from their angle, they debate and vote: ape / watch / avoid the roaster: 5th grok that takes a coin or your portfolio and roasts it using real onchain data, no mercy, with numbers council record: every 24h we auto-check which bot was right and which was wrong, stats are public, anyone can see who is right most often watch mode: set an account to track, it posts a coin address, council auto-convenes without you group mode: drop gemsearchfunbot council or roast in a telegram group and get a full vote or roast right in chat grok treats x posts as opinions not facts, cross-checks everything with blockchain, says straight up when data is insufficient, never calls anyone a scammer

THIS IS THE MOST F*CKING AWESOME USE OF GROK BOTS ON THE PLANET. 4 GROK AI DEBATE WHETHER TO BUY A COIN. VOTE. 5TH ONE ROASTS YOUR PORTFOLIO repo: gemsearch grok council 4 grok bots with ai avatars receive a coin address, each has its own role: > lookout reads what x says about the coin, picks up sentiment, catches hype and fud > skeptic checks bundles, funders and wallet links, looks for crew patterns > builder opens the site, reads the code, checks if there is a real product or an empty shell > timing checks liquidity, volume, holders, price trend and entry moment each one speaks from their angle, they debate and vote: ape / watch / avoid the roaster: 5th grok that takes a coin or your portfolio and roasts it using real onchain data, no mercy, with numbers council record: every 24h we auto-check which bot was right and which was wrong, stats are public, anyone can see who is right most often watch mode: set an account to track, it posts a coin address, council auto-convenes without you group mode: drop gemsearchfunbot council or roast in a telegram group and get a full vote or roast right in chat grok treats x posts as opinions not facts, cross-checks everything with blockchain, says straight up when data is insufficient, never calls anyone a scammer

h100envy

14,639 views • 15 days ago

CLAUDE CODE SKILL THAT DESIGNS LOGOS AS PURE CODE The constraint that forced the whole approach: Claude Code has no access to image generation So instead of faking it, one developer built a skill that writes the logo as SVG - actual XML - and renders that to a PNG The process runs in four phases: interview [ reads your repo first, asks about brand and audience only for what it can’t already see ] explore [ dispatches parallel agents that generate 3-5 distinct SVG concepts at once, shown side by side in an HTML preview with a light/dark toggle ] refine, export at 7 standard sizes from favicon to 2048px Because it’s real SVG and not a rasterized image, nothing about it degrades - same file works as a 16px favicon and a 2048px app icon, and every version is hand editable code afterward if you want to nudge one curve The creator’s own account of using it: roughly 15 rounds of generate, curate, cull, repeat - some concepts literally spelled out the product name, others went fully abstract, treating the whole thing like an evolutionary design process instead of a single lucky prompt The part worth remembering before you reach for a paid AI logo tool: this whole approach exists specifically because Claude Code can’t generate images - the constraint produced a better artifact than the workaround usually does full below

YARD

10,875 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: SpaceXAI has released a major new update for Grok Build (v1.0.14) Grok v1.0.14 is a reliability and workflow update for the Grok CLI. It makes OIDC token refresh proactive, lets PostToolUse hooks send feedback back to the model after tools run, adds per-turn token and cost tracking via grok usage, and cuts Windows downloads by about 70%, with a large set of fixes that tighten sandboxing, subagent handling, hooks, and startup. Features: • OIDC token refresh is now proactive by default for better reliability. • PostToolUse hooks can now provide feedback and context to the model after tool execution. • SDK-registered PostToolUse hooks now provide model-facing feedback. • grok usage now shows persisted per-turn token and cost data. • Retry status in composer and title now shows a short reason for the retry. • Models can now declare a different identifier for each reasoning-effort level instead of always sending the same id. • Prompt suggestions now respect remote configuration and default to the current session model. • Windows CLI downloads are now ~70% smaller using the same compressed sidecars as macOS and Linux. Bug Fixes: • grok inspect now correctly shows Claude bypass locks as advisory rather than enforced. • Subagent sessions no longer leak threads or file descriptors when the parent is busy. • Cold startup no longer performs duplicate remote settings fetches. • Compaction failures due to context size now degrade input instead of retrying identically. • --sandbox strict now restricts writes to ~/.grok/sessions only. • Subagent spawning now waits longer on a busy coordinator and shows clearer retry guidance instead of "unreachable". • Failed task and todo tool calls now appear in the transcript instead of disappearing without a trace. • Composer status row no longer collapses or flashes when using double-Enter to send now. • Session close is no longer delayed by a single slow hook; each SessionEnd hook now has its own timeout. • Hook removal in the extensions modal no longer offers actions that the handler will refuse. • Interjections during a turn are now delivered atomically or not at all. • Subagent tasks no longer get incorrectly cancelled when the parent session is waiting for completion. • Workflow detail view now closes the overlay on X or outside click instead of returning to the run list. • Resuming subagents now succeeds for larger transcripts that still fit the model context with headroom. Performance: • Startup now fetches remote settings only once per boot instead of potentially twice. • First message on large repositories no longer waits on repository status scan. • Large session memory no longer blocks the agent during turn completion or subagent spawning. • Signed-in CLI starts faster by serving remote settings from a local cache on warm boots. Download Grok Build: Update to the latest Alpha release: grok update --alpha Update to the latest Stable release: grok update

BREAKING: SpaceXAI has released a major new update for Grok Build (v1.0.14) Grok v1.0.14 is a reliability and workflow update for the Grok CLI. It makes OIDC token refresh proactive, lets PostToolUse hooks send feedback back to the model after tools run, adds per-turn token and cost tracking via grok usage, and cuts Windows downloads by about 70%, with a large set of fixes that tighten sandboxing, subagent handling, hooks, and startup. Features: • OIDC token refresh is now proactive by default for better reliability. • PostToolUse hooks can now provide feedback and context to the model after tool execution. • SDK-registered PostToolUse hooks now provide model-facing feedback. • grok usage now shows persisted per-turn token and cost data. • Retry status in composer and title now shows a short reason for the retry. • Models can now declare a different identifier for each reasoning-effort level instead of always sending the same id. • Prompt suggestions now respect remote configuration and default to the current session model. • Windows CLI downloads are now ~70% smaller using the same compressed sidecars as macOS and Linux. Bug Fixes: • grok inspect now correctly shows Claude bypass locks as advisory rather than enforced. • Subagent sessions no longer leak threads or file descriptors when the parent is busy. • Cold startup no longer performs duplicate remote settings fetches. • Compaction failures due to context size now degrade input instead of retrying identically. • --sandbox strict now restricts writes to ~/.grok/sessions only. • Subagent spawning now waits longer on a busy coordinator and shows clearer retry guidance instead of "unreachable". • Failed task and todo tool calls now appear in the transcript instead of disappearing without a trace. • Composer status row no longer collapses or flashes when using double-Enter to send now. • Session close is no longer delayed by a single slow hook; each SessionEnd hook now has its own timeout. • Hook removal in the extensions modal no longer offers actions that the handler will refuse. • Interjections during a turn are now delivered atomically or not at all. • Subagent tasks no longer get incorrectly cancelled when the parent session is waiting for completion. • Workflow detail view now closes the overlay on X or outside click instead of returning to the run list. • Resuming subagents now succeeds for larger transcripts that still fit the model context with headroom. Performance: • Startup now fetches remote settings only once per boot instead of potentially twice. • First message on large repositories no longer waits on repository status scan. • Large session memory no longer blocks the agent during turn completion or subagent spawning. • Signed-in CLI starts faster by serving remote settings from a local cache on warm boots. Download Grok Build: Update to the latest Alpha release: grok update --alpha Update to the latest Stable release: grok update

DogeDesigner

52,568 views • 1 month ago

🚨 The CEO of Antrhopic said a one-person billion-dollar company will exist by 2026 sounds crazy until you see what non-technical people are doing with Claude Code right now $10-50k/mo selling automation pipelines that take 1-2 weeks to set up Some ideas almost nobody's running yet: 1. Proposal & SOW generator for agencies and consultancies every agency writes proposals from scratch or copy-pastes from old ones and forgets to change the "client name" Claude reads the prospect brief or discovery call transcript, generates: - branded proposal with scope, timeline, deliverables - quick win plan (how exactly we will do a good output) - SOW with payment milestones - pricing options (good/better/best) - follow-up email sequence charge $500/mo per agency agencies close 20-30% more deals when proposals go out same day.. you're selling speed and save them $1k+ on the guy who does it manually and anyway not quality, without personalisation 2. Job posting-to-intel pipeline for sales teams companies reveal everything in their job postings and don't realize it Claude monitors target account career pages daily, flags: - "Head of AI" posted = they're buying, not building - 3 DevOps roles = scaling infrastructure = budget unlocked - new VP of Sales = restructuring = old vendor contracts up for review package it as buying signals delivered to Slack every morning $500-1,500/mo per sales team this is data that Apollo and ZoomInfo don't sell 3. Support ticket-to-documentation pipeline for SaaS every SaaS with 1,000+ users has the same problem.. docs are 6 months behind the product Claude crawls your help center, pulls recent Zendesk/Intercom tickets, cross-references finds questions asked 200 times last month with no matching article drafts the missing docs in your existing format.. flags stale articles for update $1,500-3,000/mo retainer the ROI math: 30% of support tickets deflected = thousands saved per month.. pipeline pays for itself week one 4. Vendor contract review & renewal tracker mid-size companies have 50-200 active vendor contracts sitting in folders nobody opens Claude reads each contract, extracts: - renewal dates and auto-renewal traps - termination notice windows - price escalation clauses - SLA commitments vs what you're actually getting delivers a dashboard with "contracts expiring in 30/60/90 days" and flags where you're overpaying $1,000-2,000/mo per company CFOs will approve this before you finish the pitch.. one caught auto-renewal pays for a year of your service 5. Employee onboarding doc generator for HR teams every company with 20+ employees has the same problem.. new hire starts Monday and nobody has their docs ready Claude reads the role title + department, generates: - personalized welcome packet - 30/60/90 day plan with milestones - tool access checklist by role - manager-specific onboarding schedule - policy summaries tailored to their department charge $300-500/mo per company HR managers spend 4-6 hours per new hire on this.. companies hiring 5+ people a month will never cancel the pattern is always the same most people will use Claude Code to build apps a small number will use it to sell pipelines to businesses still running on manual labor only the second group builds real recurring revenue the niches are wide open right now because every developer thinks this work is "too boring" boring = no competition = you set the price screenshot this. save this. repost it to save a friend's next year

🚨 The CEO of Antrhopic said a one-person billion-dollar company will exist by 2026 sounds crazy until you see what non-technical people are doing with Claude Code right now $10-50k/mo selling automation pipelines that take 1-2 weeks to set up Some ideas almost nobody's running yet: 1. Proposal & SOW generator for agencies and consultancies every agency writes proposals from scratch or copy-pastes from old ones and forgets to change the "client name" Claude reads the prospect brief or discovery call transcript, generates: - branded proposal with scope, timeline, deliverables - quick win plan (how exactly we will do a good output) - SOW with payment milestones - pricing options (good/better/best) - follow-up email sequence charge $500/mo per agency agencies close 20-30% more deals when proposals go out same day.. you're selling speed and save them $1k+ on the guy who does it manually and anyway not quality, without personalisation 2. Job posting-to-intel pipeline for sales teams companies reveal everything in their job postings and don't realize it Claude monitors target account career pages daily, flags: - "Head of AI" posted = they're buying, not building - 3 DevOps roles = scaling infrastructure = budget unlocked - new VP of Sales = restructuring = old vendor contracts up for review package it as buying signals delivered to Slack every morning $500-1,500/mo per sales team this is data that Apollo and ZoomInfo don't sell 3. Support ticket-to-documentation pipeline for SaaS every SaaS with 1,000+ users has the same problem.. docs are 6 months behind the product Claude crawls your help center, pulls recent Zendesk/Intercom tickets, cross-references finds questions asked 200 times last month with no matching article drafts the missing docs in your existing format.. flags stale articles for update $1,500-3,000/mo retainer the ROI math: 30% of support tickets deflected = thousands saved per month.. pipeline pays for itself week one 4. Vendor contract review & renewal tracker mid-size companies have 50-200 active vendor contracts sitting in folders nobody opens Claude reads each contract, extracts: - renewal dates and auto-renewal traps - termination notice windows - price escalation clauses - SLA commitments vs what you're actually getting delivers a dashboard with "contracts expiring in 30/60/90 days" and flags where you're overpaying $1,000-2,000/mo per company CFOs will approve this before you finish the pitch.. one caught auto-renewal pays for a year of your service 5. Employee onboarding doc generator for HR teams every company with 20+ employees has the same problem.. new hire starts Monday and nobody has their docs ready Claude reads the role title + department, generates: - personalized welcome packet - 30/60/90 day plan with milestones - tool access checklist by role - manager-specific onboarding schedule - policy summaries tailored to their department charge $300-500/mo per company HR managers spend 4-6 hours per new hire on this.. companies hiring 5+ people a month will never cancel the pattern is always the same most people will use Claude Code to build apps a small number will use it to sell pipelines to businesses still running on manual labor only the second group builds real recurring revenue the niches are wide open right now because every developer thinks this work is "too boring" boring = no competition = you set the price screenshot this. save this. repost it to save a friend's next year

Ronin

66,151 views • 6 months ago

20 days ago, I connected Claude Code to my newly created instagram handle.. I gained 4.3M views and 6500+ followers in less than a month [ i post Ai generated animated stories ] Full workflow: i let claude study my account before i write another reel.. This is the cleanest content workflow i've built on claude. give it your IG first. 4 prompts handle the rest.. niche research, the reel script, the hook, and the daily automation.. the whole loop is basically, give claude your IG → find what's working → write retention-optimized scripts → engineer the hook → automate the daily output.. ▫️ Setup: give claude your instagram open claude code. claude code has a built-in web tool that browses any public URL. or install any agentic browser like Browser Harness or Firecrawl or Comet browser paste this with your handle filled in: "Browse and pull the last 30 reels and posts. Analyze my recurring topics, top-performing hooks, formats, and engagement patterns. Then map out my actual audience and what they consistently respond to." claude reads your profile, pulls every reel down, and now has the context to personalize every prompt below to YOUR account, not a generic niche. if you're on claude desktop, the same works with firecrawl MCP connected. ▫️ Prompt 1 find what actually goes viral in your niche: "Analyze the highest-performing Instagram Reels, TikToks, and Reddit posts in the [niche] niche from the last 30 days. Identify repeating hooks, visual styles, emotional triggers, and content formats that consistently generate high engagement. Then summarize the 5 strongest content angles optimized for AI-generated content and short-form videos." run this after the setup. you get 5 angles backed by what's already working in your niche, cross-checked against what's already working on YOUR account. ▫️ Prompt 2 write a high-retention reel script "Write a short-form Instagram Reel script about [topic] with an aggressive hook in the first 2 seconds. Create immediate curiosity, tension, or controversy to stop scrolling, then deliver a fast and satisfying payoff. Keep it under 30 seconds and optimize the structure for watch time, replays, comments, and shares. Finish with a subtle CTA." the line that matters: "optimize the structure for watch time, replays, comments, and shares." claude writes for the metrics, not just the word count. ▫️ Prompt 3 engineer better hooks "Study the top-performing Reels in [niche] and break down the hook structure, pacing, and emotional triggers used in the first 3 seconds. Then generate 5 new hook variations that are even more curiosity-driven, emotionally charged, and optimized to stop scrolling instantly. Focus on triggers like surprise, fear, ego, urgency, or desire." most reels die in the first 2 seconds. this prompt has claude reverse-engineer what already works, then give you 5 sharper versions to swap in. ▫️ Prompt 4 automate the whole workflow "Build a complete AI-powered content workflow for Instagram in the [niche] niche. The system should identify trending topics daily, generate high-retention scripts, create matching AI visuals, turn them into short-form videos, and generate optimized captions and hashtags. Structure everything as a repeatable workflow designed for consistent daily posting and growth." once the niche and script structure are validated, this turns it into a daily loop. one prompt that handles topic → script → visual → video → caption. these 4 prompts are the building blocks. the setup is what makes them yours. your real value is in the [niche] you plug in. content workflow built in one weekend, daily posting on autopilot from monday.

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

201,810 views • 4 months ago

The Visual Studio Code insiders version that just shipped and will ship in the next few days will come with an insane amount of new capabilities. A few highlights: - You can now run sub-agents in parallel. Yes, really. I even attached a video. - Major UX improvements for sub agents, especially visible in the chat window - A new search tool wrapped as a sub-agent that iteratively runs multiple search tools: semantic_search, file_search, grep_search Which connects nicely to the point above: multiple searches running in parallel, efficiently and fast - Anthropic’s Message API is now enabled by default - You can choose the model for the cloud agent (three available, all premium) - Extended thinking support when using the Claude cloud agent This is part of the broader multi-vendor cloud support under AgentsHQ I wrote about a few weeks ago - Tasks sent to the background agent (basically the CLI tool) now always run in isolation, each with its own git worktree - In a multi-repo workspace, assigning a task to a cloud agent prompts you to choose the target repo Same behavior when opening an empty workspace with no repo - Support for building an external index for files not supported by GitHub’s default indexing - UI/UX improvements for starting new sessions and switching between local / background / cloud agents - Skills are now first-class citizens, just like prompt files, with better UX indicating when a skill is loaded - Improved API for dynamic contribution of prompt files New V2 includes skills as part of the model. Curious to see the extensions that will leverage this - Finally, initial support for showing context usage percentage per session - Skills are enabled by default - Resizable chat window and session view. Small thing, but it was driving me crazy 😁 - A new integrated browser meant to replace the old simple browser Maybe the beginning of real browser use? - Better UI/UX for token streaming in chat - Ability to index external files not supported by GitHub There’s a lot more. Some of it hasn’t fully landed yet, but everything that has is already in Insiders. The next stable release should drop in early February. As usual, I’m just shocked by the volume of features this team ships every month. After the holiday slowdown, this one is shaping up to be a wild release.

The Visual Studio Code insiders version that just shipped and will ship in the next few days will come with an insane amount of new capabilities. A few highlights: - You can now run sub-agents in parallel. Yes, really. I even attached a video. - Major UX improvements for sub agents, especially visible in the chat window - A new search tool wrapped as a sub-agent that iteratively runs multiple search tools: semantic_search, file_search, grep_search Which connects nicely to the point above: multiple searches running in parallel, efficiently and fast - Anthropic’s Message API is now enabled by default - You can choose the model for the cloud agent (three available, all premium) - Extended thinking support when using the Claude cloud agent This is part of the broader multi-vendor cloud support under AgentsHQ I wrote about a few weeks ago - Tasks sent to the background agent (basically the CLI tool) now always run in isolation, each with its own git worktree - In a multi-repo workspace, assigning a task to a cloud agent prompts you to choose the target repo Same behavior when opening an empty workspace with no repo - Support for building an external index for files not supported by GitHub’s default indexing - UI/UX improvements for starting new sessions and switching between local / background / cloud agents - Skills are now first-class citizens, just like prompt files, with better UX indicating when a skill is loaded - Improved API for dynamic contribution of prompt files New V2 includes skills as part of the model. Curious to see the extensions that will leverage this - Finally, initial support for showing context usage percentage per session - Skills are enabled by default - Resizable chat window and session view. Small thing, but it was driving me crazy 😁 - A new integrated browser meant to replace the old simple browser Maybe the beginning of real browser use? - Better UI/UX for token streaming in chat - Ability to index external files not supported by GitHub There’s a lot more. Some of it hasn’t fully landed yet, but everything that has is already in Insiders. The next stable release should drop in early February. As usual, I’m just shocked by the volume of features this team ships every month. After the holiday slowdown, this one is shaping up to be a wild release.

Oren Melamed

29,555 views • 9 months ago

Another WTF moment. A developer just open-sourced a coding agent harness that boots 245x faster than Claude Code. It's called jcode. You launch it and the first frame renders in 14 milliseconds. Claude Code takes 3,436. One active session uses 27.8 MB of RAM. Claude Code uses 386.6. Run ten sessions in parallel and jcode holds at 117 MB while OpenCode swells to 3.2 GB. Each agent has a semantic memory graph instead of a scratchpad. Every turn gets embedded as a vector. The graph is queried on every turn for related memories, and a sideagent verifies the hits before injecting them into context. Consolidation runs in the background to check for stale or conflicting facts. No manual /remember calls. No token burn on lookup tools. The provider list is 30+ deep. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, Azure, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, Fireworks, Ollama, LM Studio, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint you point it at. Ran out of tokens on your first ChatGPT Pro sub? /account swaps to the second. Then there's Swarm. Spawn two agents in the same repo and the server manages them. When agent A edits a file agent B has been reading, agent B gets pinged and can check the diff. Agents can DM each other, broadcast to the room, or spawn their own worker teams for parallel tasks. Groups, channels, and completion statuses are handled automatically. The UI has live side panels that render mermaid diagrams inline. To make it fast, the author wrote a Rust mermaid renderer 1800x faster than the JavaScript one, then wrote a custom terminal called Handterm because no existing terminal could do smooth partial-line scrolling. Self-dev mode is where it gets wild. Tell your agent to enter self-dev and it starts editing jcode's own source code, rebuilds the binary, reloads it live, and keeps working across your existing sessions. You can also resume broken sessions from Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or pi directly inside jcode. Anthropic's cache goes cold at the 5-minute mark and you're staring down a big cache miss on your next turn? The UI warns you before you spend the tokens. Written in Rust. MIT licensed. Runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Termux. Sitting at 11.2k stars with a native iOS app coming.

Another WTF moment. A developer just open-sourced a coding agent harness that boots 245x faster than Claude Code. It's called jcode. You launch it and the first frame renders in 14 milliseconds. Claude Code takes 3,436. One active session uses 27.8 MB of RAM. Claude Code uses 386.6. Run ten sessions in parallel and jcode holds at 117 MB while OpenCode swells to 3.2 GB. Each agent has a semantic memory graph instead of a scratchpad. Every turn gets embedded as a vector. The graph is queried on every turn for related memories, and a sideagent verifies the hits before injecting them into context. Consolidation runs in the background to check for stale or conflicting facts. No manual /remember calls. No token burn on lookup tools. The provider list is 30+ deep. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, Azure, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Groq, Mistral, Perplexity, Fireworks, Ollama, LM Studio, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint you point it at. Ran out of tokens on your first ChatGPT Pro sub? /account swaps to the second. Then there's Swarm. Spawn two agents in the same repo and the server manages them. When agent A edits a file agent B has been reading, agent B gets pinged and can check the diff. Agents can DM each other, broadcast to the room, or spawn their own worker teams for parallel tasks. Groups, channels, and completion statuses are handled automatically. The UI has live side panels that render mermaid diagrams inline. To make it fast, the author wrote a Rust mermaid renderer 1800x faster than the JavaScript one, then wrote a custom terminal called Handterm because no existing terminal could do smooth partial-line scrolling. Self-dev mode is where it gets wild. Tell your agent to enter self-dev and it starts editing jcode's own source code, rebuilds the binary, reloads it live, and keeps working across your existing sessions. You can also resume broken sessions from Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or pi directly inside jcode. Anthropic's cache goes cold at the 5-minute mark and you're staring down a big cache miss on your next turn? The UI warns you before you spend the tokens. Written in Rust. MIT licensed. Runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, and Termux. Sitting at 11.2k stars with a native iOS app coming.

Brady Long

209,050 views • 2 months ago

A 27B model in 12 GB of VRAM. Full 262K context. 70 tok/s. And now it is UNCENSORED. I ran it on my own RTX 3090, held to 12 GB. This is Mirai S Qwen3.8-27B, 2.4 bits per weight, an 11 GB file. With my llama.cpp port the same card did 82K context at 38 tok/s inside 12 GB. Then Palmer took the port and did the hard part. Same card, same file, his serve: - context: 82K -> 262,144 with q8 KV - decode: 38 -> 69.9 tok/s - VRAM peak: 11.7 GB - prefill: 1,124 tok/s He keeps part of the KV cache in VRAM and the rest in pinned RAM, and he drafts with MTP at every depth. He checked every kernel against my fork token for token and wrote down every experiment, the failed ones too. On his real 12 GB RTX 4070 it does 76.6. My part is small. I added abliteration. You cant edit these weights, they are compressed codes, so I measured the refusal direction on the quantized model and the engine removes it while the model runs. A 1.3 MB file and 1 flag: - harmful prompts refused: 64 of 64 -> 0 of 64 - held-out set: 78 of 82 -> 0 of 82 - decode: 69.9 -> 69.7 tok/s Counted by a regex, and with thinking on 1 of 24 still refuses. Deep in the context it gets slower on my card: 27.9 tok/s at 60K. So thats 12 GB of VRAM, 262K context, 70 tok/s, abliterated. Open weights, open code, runs on your desk. Cary did a genius amount of work and almost nobody has seen it. Go follow Palmer right now, I mean it. serve: weights + vector:

A 27B model in 12 GB of VRAM. Full 262K context. 70 tok/s. And now it is UNCENSORED. I ran it on my own RTX 3090, held to 12 GB. This is Mirai S Qwen3.8-27B, 2.4 bits per weight, an 11 GB file. With my llama.cpp port the same card did 82K context at 38 tok/s inside 12 GB. Then Palmer took the port and did the hard part. Same card, same file, his serve: - context: 82K -> 262,144 with q8 KV - decode: 38 -> 69.9 tok/s - VRAM peak: 11.7 GB - prefill: 1,124 tok/s He keeps part of the KV cache in VRAM and the rest in pinned RAM, and he drafts with MTP at every depth. He checked every kernel against my fork token for token and wrote down every experiment, the failed ones too. On his real 12 GB RTX 4070 it does 76.6. My part is small. I added abliteration. You cant edit these weights, they are compressed codes, so I measured the refusal direction on the quantized model and the engine removes it while the model runs. A 1.3 MB file and 1 flag: - harmful prompts refused: 64 of 64 -> 0 of 64 - held-out set: 78 of 82 -> 0 of 82 - decode: 69.9 -> 69.7 tok/s Counted by a regex, and with thinking on 1 of 24 still refuses. Deep in the context it gets slower on my card: 27.9 tok/s at 60K. So thats 12 GB of VRAM, 262K context, 70 tok/s, abliterated. Open weights, open code, runs on your desk. Cary did a genius amount of work and almost nobody has seen it. Go follow Palmer right now, I mean it. serve: weights + vector:

Alexey Fateev

124,227 views • 15 days ago

Introducing fx, a tiny, open, native coding agent from Vercel Labs. Originally an internal tool, fx is a harness and CLI written in Zig, optimized for research and embedding in larger systems. Today, we're open sourcing it. fx is built on three principles: 1. Fast. A single native binary, no runtime to install. It cold starts in 10µs and does no unnecessary work or I/O before accepting input. fx is the answer to "how fast can a coding agent be?" 2. Light. The 6.3MiB binary uses single-digit megabytes of memory at baseline, made for instant installation and embedding in resource-constrained environments and agent sandboxes. 3. Open. Apache-2.0, model and provider agnostic, suitable for local and cloud inference. Its small core extends through skills, plugins, and MCP. Minimalism is an obsession throughout the entire harness: system prompt, tools, features, binary. The goal was to keep context usage and time to first token low, and make fx optimal for model benchmarking, sandboxing, evals, and gyms. You can use fx directly or embed it as infrastructure. The CLI feels more like a Unix shell than an IDE in the terminal: it preserves scroll history, produces minimal output, and uses complex TUI rendering very, very sparingly. Programmatically, 𝚏𝚡 𝚊𝚜𝚔 --𝚓𝚜𝚘𝚗 gives structured output, 𝚏𝚡 𝚊𝚌𝚙 connects to editors and other clients, and WebAssembly can even run the whole thing inside the browser (see: Privacy is a design constraint: no product telemetry, sessions and usage stay local, and no source code or prompts are shared with any endpoint other than inference. With local inference and auto-updates off, fx is fully hermetic. fx is experimental. Use at your own risk and expect frequent changes. Chat with us on X ( or file issues ( 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚕 -𝚏𝚜𝚂𝙻 𝚏𝚡.𝚜𝚑/𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚙.𝚜𝚑 | 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚑

Introducing fx, a tiny, open, native coding agent from Vercel Labs. Originally an internal tool, fx is a harness and CLI written in Zig, optimized for research and embedding in larger systems. Today, we're open sourcing it. fx is built on three principles: 1. Fast. A single native binary, no runtime to install. It cold starts in 10µs and does no unnecessary work or I/O before accepting input. fx is the answer to "how fast can a coding agent be?" 2. Light. The 6.3MiB binary uses single-digit megabytes of memory at baseline, made for instant installation and embedding in resource-constrained environments and agent sandboxes. 3. Open. Apache-2.0, model and provider agnostic, suitable for local and cloud inference. Its small core extends through skills, plugins, and MCP. Minimalism is an obsession throughout the entire harness: system prompt, tools, features, binary. The goal was to keep context usage and time to first token low, and make fx optimal for model benchmarking, sandboxing, evals, and gyms. You can use fx directly or embed it as infrastructure. The CLI feels more like a Unix shell than an IDE in the terminal: it preserves scroll history, produces minimal output, and uses complex TUI rendering very, very sparingly. Programmatically, 𝚏𝚡 𝚊𝚜𝚔 --𝚓𝚜𝚘𝚗 gives structured output, 𝚏𝚡 𝚊𝚌𝚙 connects to editors and other clients, and WebAssembly can even run the whole thing inside the browser (see: Privacy is a design constraint: no product telemetry, sessions and usage stay local, and no source code or prompts are shared with any endpoint other than inference. With local inference and auto-updates off, fx is fully hermetic. fx is experimental. Use at your own risk and expect frequent changes. Chat with us on X ( or file issues ( 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚕 -𝚏𝚜𝚂𝙻 𝚏𝚡.𝚜𝚑/𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚙.𝚜𝚑 | 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚑

Vercel Developers

966,057 views • 2 months ago

I built a custom TradingView indicator with Claude Code & Fable 5. It's called the Storm Gauge and is built off a real quant trading strategy. I open-sourced the full code on GitHub. Free to install, free to fork, yours to improve. Here's how to install a quant indicator on your TradingView chart: What it actually is The Storm Gauge is a live implementation of the GARCH model, a Nobel Prize-winning volatility framework that real quant desks run daily. It forecasts how "violent" tomorrow's market could be by combining three inputs: an asset's baseline volatility, yesterday's shock, and where volatility was already sitting before that shock happened. It doesn't predict market direction. Instead, it measures risk, in real time, on your actual chart. How to install it Method 1. Plugin command Open the GitHub repo: Find the installation section, copy the command, and paste it into Claude Code. It runs the plugin install automatically. Method 2. Manual config Open garchmethod.md in the repo, copy the entire file, and paste it into Claude Code. It fetches the skill files directly and verifies the strategy for you. (you only need one method; I'm just showing both) Getting it onto your TradingView chart Inside the repo, there's a Pine Script folder. Open it, copy the entire file. Go into TradingView's Pine Editor, paste it in, hit Enter, and refresh. That's it. The Storm Gauge now runs live on your chart as a real number. Once it's installed, just talk to it: → "What's the volatility forecast on Bitcoin?" → "Explain what the current volatility forecast means on $BTC and how it should impact my position sizing" → "Help me size my S&P500 position according to current market volatility" Does it actually work? I backtested the same EMA cross strategy two ways across 15 years of BTC data. Same entries, same exits. → Fixed position sizing: $17,957 final equity → Storm Gauge (GARCH) sizing: $21,205 final equity Fewer drawdowns, less risk, better result. Full breakdown of the entire build process in my recent article - pinned on my profile.

Miles Deutscher

56,625 views • 3 months ago

if i wanted to be absolutely cracked with faceless tiktok shop slideshows as a beginner, i'd do this: > post in photo mode, never video mode. the swipe is the whole cheat code. > a manual swipe reads as intent to the algo, auto-play reads as a passive skip. > open slide one on a pain point people see in the mirror, not a feature. "3 signs of bad gut health" beats "new gut supplement" every time. > agitate with one symptom per slide, most relatable one first. they should be nodding before they hit the product. > reveal the product as the mechanism, then kill the objections dead. sugar-free, no gelatin, halal, whatever the "but" is, answer it before they think it. > hard cta on the last slide with the yellow cart. by then they've swiped to the end so they've already qualified themselves. > keep it 5 to 7 slides, no more. the algo rewards people finishing, and everyone drops off after 7 anyway. > get the order perfect before you post. sequence locks the second you hit publish, no editing it after. > type your text in tiktok's native editor, never bake it into the image. that's how tiktok reads your words and ranks you in search. drop your keywords straight in there. > keep every word in the middle 60% of the screen. the caption, the buttons, the cart all eat the edges. > write it for someone with the sound off and their thumb not moving. each slide has to land in two seconds. if a line needs a second read, most people never read it. > use the commercial sounds library on a business account or you'll get muted. grab something trending in the last 7 days, not last month. > shoot for 9:16, 1080x1920. don't crop a square shot, outpaint the background so it fills the whole screen. > run volume. 10 to 20 versions a week, swap the first slide, the sound, the order, let the winner tell you what to do next. > watch saves and swipe-throughs, not views. a save is someone telling the algo to go push this. one rule i wouldn't break: never fake a before/after or invent proof on a real product. that's the one thing that actually gets you nuked, not the faceless part. everything else is cope. this is how you move fast and make money.

if i wanted to be absolutely cracked with faceless tiktok shop slideshows as a beginner, i'd do this: > post in photo mode, never video mode. the swipe is the whole cheat code. > a manual swipe reads as intent to the algo, auto-play reads as a passive skip. > open slide one on a pain point people see in the mirror, not a feature. "3 signs of bad gut health" beats "new gut supplement" every time. > agitate with one symptom per slide, most relatable one first. they should be nodding before they hit the product. > reveal the product as the mechanism, then kill the objections dead. sugar-free, no gelatin, halal, whatever the "but" is, answer it before they think it. > hard cta on the last slide with the yellow cart. by then they've swiped to the end so they've already qualified themselves. > keep it 5 to 7 slides, no more. the algo rewards people finishing, and everyone drops off after 7 anyway. > get the order perfect before you post. sequence locks the second you hit publish, no editing it after. > type your text in tiktok's native editor, never bake it into the image. that's how tiktok reads your words and ranks you in search. drop your keywords straight in there. > keep every word in the middle 60% of the screen. the caption, the buttons, the cart all eat the edges. > write it for someone with the sound off and their thumb not moving. each slide has to land in two seconds. if a line needs a second read, most people never read it. > use the commercial sounds library on a business account or you'll get muted. grab something trending in the last 7 days, not last month. > shoot for 9:16, 1080x1920. don't crop a square shot, outpaint the background so it fills the whole screen. > run volume. 10 to 20 versions a week, swap the first slide, the sound, the order, let the winner tell you what to do next. > watch saves and swipe-throughs, not views. a save is someone telling the algo to go push this. one rule i wouldn't break: never fake a before/after or invent proof on a real product. that's the one thing that actually gets you nuked, not the faceless part. everything else is cope. this is how you move fast and make money.

Sulfur

75,227 views • 2 months ago