正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT 5.5 Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

71,493 subscribers

28,612 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

this guy vibe coded this entire motion gallery with opus 4.8 using ONE prompt claude opus 4.8 >>> gpt 5.5

this guy vibe coded this entire motion gallery with opus 4.8 using ONE prompt claude opus 4.8 >>> gpt 5.5

Om Patel

32,907 次观看 • 3 个月前

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."

Fireworks

67,292 次观看 • 3 个月前

❤️‍🔥 Opus 4.8 + Claude Animated Brand Concept Site Prompt ↓

Viktor Oddy

24,142 次观看 • 2 个月前

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free

DROID

190,831 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

99,526 次观看 • 4 个月前

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?

Chris

54,888 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Opus 5 VS GPT 5.6 SOL Created with

Claude Opus 5 VS GPT 5.6 SOL Created with

Flowith

120,365 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT 5.6 SOL vs Claude Opus 5 Created with

GPT 5.6 SOL vs Claude Opus 5 Created with

Flowith

60,003 次观看 • 1 个月前

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

728,796 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude

Romain Torres

450,506 次观看 • 2 个月前

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

105,523 次观看 • 2 个月前

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode

Brais Moure

112,118 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇

Mark Lou

44,697 次观看 • 3 个月前

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8

Sahil

975,162 次观看 • 3 个月前

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.

Meng To

73,341 次观看 • 3 个月前

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

479,144 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

FHILY👑

34,662 次观看 • 2 个月前

We gave two Claude models the same character sheet Opus 5 vs Opus 4.8 Both prompts run on Seedance 2.0. Our thoughts in thread

We gave two Claude models the same character sheet Opus 5 vs Opus 4.8 Both prompts run on Seedance 2.0. Our thoughts in thread

Magnific

18,989 次观看 • 1 个月前

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

Applied Compute

27,510 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇

Poonam Soni

32,348 次观看 • 4 个月前