Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT 5.5 Prompt 👇

viktoroddy's profile picture

Viktor Oddy

55,501 subscribers

26,749 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."
0:12

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."

Fireworks

66,852 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

❤️‍🔥 Opus 4.8 + Claude Animated Brand Concept Site Prompt ↓
0:16

❤️‍🔥 Opus 4.8 + Claude Animated Brand Concept Site Prompt ↓

Viktor Oddy

23,964 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free
0:13

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free

DROID

190,597 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇
0:13

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

99,526 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?
0:12

Kimi K3 vs Claude 4.8 Opus colosseum! 2.50$ vs 7.60$ Which one did better?

Chris

54,888 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model
0:18

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

727,939 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!
0:16

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

105,523 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude
0:13

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude

Romain Torres

449,690 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇
0:15

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇

Mark Lou

44,697 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode
0:11

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode

Brais Moure

112,071 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.
0:18

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.

Meng To

73,341 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8
0:17

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8

Sahil

974,723 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

468,355 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.
0:15

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

FHILY👑

34,497 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.
0:15

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

Applied Compute

26,875 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇
0:16

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇

Poonam Soni

32,348 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

IT'S SO OVER!!! Claude Opus 4.6 can one-shot anything. Prompt below 👇
0:13

IT'S SO OVER!!! Claude Opus 4.6 can one-shot anything. Prompt below 👇

Daniel Ch

1,086,717 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Google Stitch vs Claude Prompt 👇
0:12

Google Stitch vs Claude Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

1,002,416 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.
0:15

Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

601,569 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

3D Digital Agency Website Opus 4.8 + Claude Design → Build Want to recreate this design? ↓
0:16

3D Digital Agency Website Opus 4.8 + Claude Design → Build Want to recreate this design? ↓

Viktor Oddy

65,838 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce